XML 117 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
12 Months Ended
Apr. 27, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
13. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and the company’s assumptions (unobservable inputs). Determining where an asset or liability falls within that hierarchy depends on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole. An adjustment to the pricing method used within either level 1 or level 2 inputs could generate a fair value measurement that effectively falls in a lower level in the hierarchy. The hierarchy consists of three broad levels as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 – Inputs other than level 1 inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable, and

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs developed using the company’s estimates and assumptions, which reflect those that market participants would use.

Recurring Basis

The following table presents information about assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

Fair value measurements at April 27, 2014 using:
Quoted prices in
active markets
for identical
assets
Significant other
observable inputs
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(amounts in thousands)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Assets:
Limited Term Bond Fund
$ 2,576 N/A N/A $ 2,576
Low Duration Bond Fund
2,077 N/A N/A 2,077
Intermediate Term Bond Fund
1,641 N/A N/A 1,641
Premier Money Market Fund
755 N/A N/A 755
Other
10 N/A N/A 10

Fair value measurements at April 28, 2013 using:
Quoted prices in
active markets
for identical
assets
Significant other
observable inputs
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(amounts in thousands)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Assets:
Limited Term Bond Fund
$ 2,092 N/A N/A $ 2,092
Low Duration Bond Fund
2,076 N/A N/A 2,076
Intermediate Term Bond Fund
1,118 N/A N/A 1,118

The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment. We evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each quarter based on various factors and it is possible that an asset or liability may be classified differently from quarter to quarter. However, we expect that changes in classifications between different levels will be rare.
 
The fair value of the company’s long-term debt is estimated by discounting the future cash flows at rates currently offered to the company for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities. At April 27, 2014, the carrying value of the company’s long-term debt was $4.4 million and the fair value was $4.6 million. At April 28, 2013, the carrying value of the company’s long-term debt was $6.6 million and the fair value was $7.0 million.
 
Nonrecurring Basis

As of April 27, 2014, we had no assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis other than the assets acquired from Bodet & Horst (see note 2) that were acquired at fair value.

Fair value measurements at April 27, 2014 using:
Quoted prices in
active markets
for identical
assets
Significant other
observable inputs
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(amounts in thousands)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Assets:
Equipment
$ - $ 890 $ - $ 890
Non-compete Agreement
- - 882 882
Customer Relationships
- - 868 868

The equipment was classified as level 2 as the fair value was determined using quoted market prices from a third party. The non-compete was recorded at its fair value using a discounted cash flow valuation model that used significant unobservable inputs and was classified as level 3. The customer relationships were recorded at fair value using a multi-period excess earnings valuation model that used significant unobservable inputs and was classified as level 3.