XML 22 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Non-Performing Assets Including Trouble Debt Restructurings
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Non-Performing Assets Including Trouble Debt Restructurings [Abstract] 
Non-Performing Assets Including Trouble Debt Restructurings
10. Non-performing Assets Including Trouble Debt Restructurings

The following table presents information concerning non-performing assets including TDR (in thousands, except percentages):

 

     September 30,
2011		     December 31,
2010		  

Non-accrual loans

     

Commercial

    $ 24      $ 3,679   

Commercial loans secured by real estate

      3,664        6,731   

Real estate-mortgage

      1,339        1,879   
  

 

 

    

 

 

  

Total

      5,027        12,289   
  

 

 

    

 

 

  

Other real estate owned

     

Commercial loans secured by real estate

      —          436   

Real estate-mortgage

      4        302   
  

 

 

    

 

 

  

Total

      4        738   
  

 

 

    

 

 

  

Total restructured loans not in non-accrual (TDR)

      313        1,337   
  

 

 

    

 

 

  

Total non-performing assets including TDR

    $ 5,344      $ 14,364   
  

 

 

    

 

 

  

Total non-performing assets as a percent of loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, and other real estate owned

      0.80 %      2.12 % 

Consistent with accounting and regulatory guidance, the bank recognizes a TDR when the bank, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower's financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that would not normally be considered. Regardless of the form of concession granted, the bank's objective in offering a troubled debt restructure is to increase the probability of repayment of the borrower's loan.

To be considered a TDR, both of the following criteria must be met:

 

•  

the borrower must be experiencing financial difficulties; and

 

•  

the bank, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that would not otherwise be considered.

Factors that indicate a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties include, but are not limited to:

 

•  

the borrower is currently in default on their loan(s);

 

•  

the borrower has filed for bankruptcy;

 

•  

the borrower has insufficient cash flows to service their loan(s); and

 

•  

the borrower is unable to obtain refinancing from other sources at a market rate similar to rates available to a non-troubled debtor.

 

Factors that indicate that a concession has been granted include, but are not limited to:

 

•  

the borrower is granted an interest rate reduction to a level below market rates for debt with similar risk; or

 

•  

the borrower is granted a material maturity date extension, or extension of the amortization plan to provide payment relief. For purposes of this policy, a material maturity date extension will generally include any maturity date extension, or the aggregate of multiple consecutive maturity date extensions, that exceed 120 days. A restructuring that results in an insignificant delay in payment, i.e. 120 days or less, is not necessarily a TDR. Insignificant payment delays occur when the amount of the restructured payments subject to the delay is insignificant relative to the unpaid principal or collateral value, and will result in an insignificant shortfall in the originally scheduled contractual amount due, and/or the delay in timing of the restructured payment period is insignificant relative to the frequency of payments, the original maturity or the original amortization.

The determination of whether a restructured loan is a TDR requires consideration of all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the modification. No single factor is determinative of whether a restructuring is a TDR. An overall general decline in the economy or some deterioration in a borrower's financial condition does not automatically mean that the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. Accordingly, determination of whether a modification is a TDR involves a large degree of judgment.

Any loan modification where the borrower's aggregate exposure is at least $250,000 and where the loan currently maintains a criticized or classified risk rating, i.e. OLEM, Substandard or Doubtful, or where the loan will be assigned a criticized or classified rating after the modification is evaluated to determine the need for TDR classification.

The following table details the TDRs that were granted during the quarter ending September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands).

 

Loans in non-accrual status

    # of
Loans		    Current
Balance		     

Concession Granted

Commercial loan secured by real estate

    1    $ 1,130      

Extension of maturity date

The following table details the TDRs that were granted during the nine month period ending at September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands).

 

Loans in accrual status

    # of
Loans		    Current
Balance		     

Concession Granted

Commercial loan secured by real estate

    1    $ 313      

Extension of maturity date

 

Loans in non-accrual status

    # of
Loans		    Current
Balance		     

Concession Granted

Commercial loan secured by real estate

    3    $ 2,129      

Extension of maturity date

The following table details the TDRs at December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands).

 

Loans in accrual status

    # of
Loans		    Current
Balance		     

Concession Granted

Commercial loan secured by real estate

    2    $ 1,337      

Extension of maturity date

 

In all instances where loans have been modified in troubled debt restructurings the pre- and post-modified balances are the same.

Once a loan is classified as a TDR, this classification will remain until documented improvement in the financial position of the account supports confidence that all principal and interest will be paid according to terms. Additionally, the customer must have re-established a track record of timely payments according to the restructured contract terms for a minimum of six (6) consecutive months prior to consideration for removing the loan from TDR status. However, a loan will continue to be on non-accrual status until, consistent with our policy, the borrower has made a minimum of 12 consecutive payments in accordance with the terms of the loan.

During the past 12 months, the Company had one restructured commercial real-estate loan in non-accrual status that defaulted from making the required payments. As a result of this, the Company sold the property at auction and recognized a charge-off of $701,000. The borrowers are making monthly payments to repay the Company for this charge-off. Additionally, we initiated foreclosure on two of the non-accrual commercial real-estate TDR's in the third quarter of 2011 that were not performing under the restructured terms. This caused us to record a net charge-off of $640,000 on these loans. The two restructured loans as of December 31, 2010, have been repaid in-full.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, (i) the gross interest income that would have been recorded if non-accrual loans had been current in accordance with their original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period or since origination if held for part of the period, (ii) the amount of interest income actually recorded on such loans, and (iii) the net reduction in interest income attributable to such loans (in thousands).

 

     Three months
ended
September 30,		     Nine months
ended
September 30,		  
     2011      2010     2011     2010  

Interest income due in accordance with original terms

    $ 84       $ 281      $ 313      $ 818   

Interest income recorded

      —           (112 )      (173 )      (354 ) 
  

 

 

     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

  

Net reduction in interest income

    $ 84       $ 169      $ 140      $ 464