The following tables summarize the rollforward of the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands).

The Company recorded a $325,000 loan loss provision recovery in the second quarter of 2022 as compared to a $100,000 provision expense recorded in the second quarter of 2021. For the first six months of 2022, the Company recorded a $725,000 provision recovery compared to a $500,000 provision expense recorded in the first six months of 2021, representing a $1.2 million favorable shift between years. The 2022 provision recovery reflects improved credit quality for the overall portfolio due to several loan upgrades, a reduced loan portfolio size due to increased payoff activity, and lower levels of criticized assets. As demonstrated historically, the Company continues its strategic conviction that a strong allowance for loan losses is needed, which has proven to be essential given the support provided to certain borrowers as they fully recover from the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, we believe that non-performing assets remain well controlled, and such assets totaled $3.2 million, or 0.34% of total loans, at June 30, 2022 compared to $3.3 million, or 0.34% of total loans, at December 31, 2021. It should be noted that the 100% SBA guarantee on PPP loans minimizes the level of credit risk associated with the loans. As a result, such loans are assigned a 0% risk weight for purposes of calculating the Bank’s risk-based capital ratios. Therefore, it was deemed appropriate to not allocate any portion of the loan loss reserve for the PPP loans.

The Company continues to experience low net loan charge-offs, which were $105,000, or 0.02% of total average loans, in the first six months of 2022 and is relatively consistent with net loan charge-offs of $93,000, or 0.02% of total average loans, in the first six months of 2021. Even though the Company recognized a loan loss provision recovery during the first half of the year, the balance of the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2022 is only slightly lower than the balance of the allowance at June 30, 2021 by $184,000, or 1.6%. The allowance for loan losses provided 357% coverage of non-performing assets, and 1.20% of total loans, at June 30, 2022, compared to 373% coverage of non-performing assets, and 1.26% of total loans, at December 31, 2021.

The following tables summarize the loan portfolio and allowance for loan loss by the primary segments of the loan portfolio (in thousands).

The segments of the Company’s loan portfolio are disaggregated into classes that allows management to monitor risk and performance. The loan classes used are consistent with the internal reports evaluated by the Company’s management and Board of Directors to monitor risk and performance within various segments of its loan portfolio. The commercial loan segment includes both the commercial and industrial and the owner occupied commercial real estate loan classes while the remaining segments are not separated into classes as management monitors risk in these loans at the segment level. The residential mortgage loan segment is comprised of first lien amortizing residential mortgage loans and home equity loans secured by residential real estate. The consumer loan segment consists primarily of installment loans and overdraft lines of credit connected with customer deposit accounts.

Management evaluates for possible impairment any individual loan in the commercial or commercial real estate segment that is in non-accrual status or classified as a Troubled Debt Restructure (TDR). In addition, consumer and residential mortgage loans with a balance of $150,000 or more are evaluated for impairment. Loans are considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in evaluating impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.

Once the determination has been made that a loan is impaired, the determination of whether a specific allocation of the allowance is necessary is measured by comparing the recorded investment in the loan to the fair value of the loan using one of three methods: (a) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; (b) the loan’s observable market price; or (c) the fair value of the collateral less selling costs for collateral dependent loans. The method is selected on a loan-by-loan basis, with management primarily utilizing either the discounted cash flows or the fair value of collateral method. The evaluation of the need and amount of a specific allocation of the allowance and whether a loan can be removed from impairment status is made on a quarterly basis. The Company’s policy for recognizing interest income on impaired loans does not differ from its overall policy for interest recognition.

The need for an updated appraisal on collateral dependent loans is determined on a case-by-case basis. The useful life of an appraisal or evaluation will vary depending upon the circumstances of the property and the economic conditions in the marketplace. A new appraisal is not required if there is an existing appraisal which, along with other information, is sufficient to determine a reasonable value for the property and to support an appropriate and adequate allowance for loan losses. At a minimum, annual documented reevaluation of the property is completed by the Bank’s internal Collections and Assigned Risk Department to support the value of the property.

When reviewing an appraisal associated with an existing real estate collateral dependent transaction, the Bank’s internal Collections and Assigned Risk Department must determine if there have been material changes to the underlying

assumptions in the appraisal which affect the original estimate of value. Some of the factors that could cause material changes to reported values include:

The value of the property is adjusted to appropriately reflect the above listed factors and the value is discounted to reflect the value impact of a forced or distressed sale, any outstanding senior liens, any outstanding unpaid real estate taxes, transfer taxes and closing costs that would occur with sale of the real estate. If the Collections and Assigned Risk Department personnel determine that a reasonable value cannot be derived based on available information, a new appraisal is ordered. The determination of the need for a new appraisal, versus completion of a property valuation by the Bank’s Collections and Assigned Risk Department personnel, rests with the Collections and Assigned Risk Department and not the originating account officer.

The following tables present impaired loans by portfolio segment, segregated by those for which a specific allowance was required and those for which a specific allowance was not necessary.

At June 30, 2022

IMPAIRED

LOANS WITH

IMPAIRED LOANS WITH

NO SPECIFIC

SPECIFIC ALLOWANCE

ALLOWANCE

TOTAL IMPAIRED LOANS

UNPAID

RECORDED

RELATED

RECORDED

PRINCIPAL

INVESTMENT

ALLOWANCE

INVESTMENT

BALANCE

(IN THOUSANDS)

Commercial

2,087

612

—

2,087

2,254

Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate

—

Total impaired loans

2,092

617

—

2,092

2,280


	At December 31, 2021
					IMPAIRED
					LOANS WITH
	IMPAIRED LOANS WITH				NO SPECIFIC
	SPECIFIC ALLOWANCE				ALLOWANCE		TOTAL IMPAIRED LOANS
									UNPAID
	RECORDED		RELATED		RECORDED		RECORDED		PRINCIPAL
	INVESTMENT		ALLOWANCE		INVESTMENT		INVESTMENT		BALANCE

	(IN THOUSANDS)
Commercial	$	2,165	$	628	$	—	$	2,165	$	2,260
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate		5		5		—		5		27
Total impaired loans	$	2,170	$	633	$	—	$	2,170	$	2,287

The following table presents the average recorded investment in impaired loans and related interest income recognized for the periods indicated (in thousands).


	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2022		2021		2022		2021
Average impaired balance:
Commercial	$	2,107	$	2,420	$	2,126	$	1,895
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate		5		8		5		8
Average investment in impaired loans	$	2,112	$	2,428	$	2,131	$	1,903
Interest income recognized:
Commercial	$	—	$	1	$	—	$	13
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate		—		—		—		—
Interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired loans	$	—	$	1	$	—	$	13

Management uses a nine-point internal risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of the overall loan portfolio. The first six categories are considered not criticized. The first five “Pass” categories are aggregated, while the Pass-6, Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful categories are disaggregated to separate pools. The criticized rating categories utilized by management generally follow bank regulatory definitions. The Special Mention category includes assets that are currently protected but are potentially weak, resulting in an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a Substandard classification. Loans in the Substandard category have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt, and have a distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the weaknesses are not corrected. All loans greater than 90 days past due, or for which any portion of the loan represents a specific allocation of the allowance for loan losses are placed in Substandard or Doubtful.

To help ensure that risk ratings are accurate and reflect the present and future capacity of borrowers to repay a loan as agreed, the Company has a structured loan rating process, which dictates that, at a minimum, credit reviews are mandatory for all commercial and commercial mortgage loan relationships with aggregate balances in excess of $1,000,000 within a 12-month period. Generally, consumer and residential mortgage loans are included in the Pass categories unless a specific action, such as bankruptcy, delinquency, or death occurs to raise awareness of a possible credit event. The Company’s commercial relationship managers are responsible for the timely and accurate risk rating of the loans in their portfolios at origination and on an ongoing basis. Risk ratings are assigned by the account officer, but require independent review and rating concurrence from the Company’s internal Loan Review Department. The Loan Review Department is an experienced, independent function which reports directly to the Board’s Audit Committee. The scope of commercial portfolio coverage by the Loan Review Department is defined and presented to the Audit Committee for approval on an annual basis. The approved scope of coverage for the year ending December 31, 2022 requires review of approximately 40% of the commercial loan portfolio.

In addition to loan monitoring by the account officer and Loan Review Department, the Company also requires presentation of all credits rated Pass-6 with aggregate balances greater than $2,000,000, all credits rated Special Mention or Substandard with aggregate balances greater than $250,000, and all credits rated Doubtful with aggregate balances greater than $100,000 on an individual basis to the Company’s Loan Loss Reserve Committee on a quarterly basis. Additionally, the Asset Quality Task Force, which is a group comprised of senior level personnel, meets monthly to monitor the status of problem loans.

The following table presents the classes of the commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolios summarized by the aggregate Pass and the criticized categories of Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful within the internal risk rating system.

At June 30, 2022

SPECIAL

PASS

MENTION

SUBSTANDARD

DOUBTFUL

TOTAL

(IN THOUSANDS)

Commercial and industrial

127,901

—

5,953

—

133,854

Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)

2,242

—

2,242

Commercial loans secured by owner occupied real estate

86,774

—

1,007

—

87,781

Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate

411,962

10,199

10,665

432,831

Total

628,879

10,199

17,625

656,708


	At December 31, 2021
			SPECIAL
	PASS		MENTION		SUBSTANDARD		DOUBTFUL		TOTAL

	(IN THOUSANDS)
Commercial and industrial	$	125,079	$	6,722	$	738	$	1,643	$	134,182
Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)		17,311		—		—		—		17,311
Commercial loans secured by owner occupied real estate		98,271		297		1,076		—		99,644
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate		399,104		19,322		12,394		5		430,825
Total	$	639,765	$	26,341	$	14,208	$	1,648	$	681,962

It is generally the policy of the Bank that the outstanding balance of any residential mortgage loan that exceeds 90-days past due as to principal and/or interest is transferred to non-accrual status and an evaluation is completed to determine the fair value of the collateral less selling costs, unless the balance is minor. A charge down is recorded for any deficiency balance determined from the collateral evaluation. The remaining non-accrual balance is reported as impaired with no specific allowance. It is generally the policy of the Bank that the outstanding balance of any consumer loan that exceeds 90-days past due as to principal and/or interest is charged off. The following tables present the performing and non-performing outstanding balances of the residential and consumer portfolio classes.


	At June 30, 2022
			NON-
	PERFORMING		PERFORMING		TOTAL

	(IN THOUSANDS)
Real estate – residential mortgage	$	291,454	$	1,138	$	292,592
Consumer		15,023		10		15,033
Total	$	306,477	$	1,148	$	307,625


	At December 31, 2021
			NON-
	PERFORMING		PERFORMING		TOTAL

	(IN THOUSANDS)
Real estate – residential mortgage	$	286,843	$	1,153	$	287,996
Consumer		15,096		—		15,096
Total	$	301,939	$	1,153	$	303,092

Management further monitors the performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio by analyzing the age of the portfolio as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aging categories of performing loans and non-accrual loans.

At June 30, 2022

90 DAYS

30 – 59

60 – 89

PAST DUE

DAYS

90 DAYS

TOTAL

AND STILL

CURRENT

PAST DUE

LOANS

ACCRUING

(IN THOUSANDS)

Commercial and industrial

133,613

200

—

241

133,854

—

Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)

2,242

—

2,242

—

Commercial loans secured by owner occupied real estate

87,777

—

87,781

—

Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate

432,078

753

—

753

432,831

—

Real estate – residential mortgage

290,338

684

302

1,268

2,254

292,592

205

Consumer

14,729

283

304

15,033

—

Total

960,777

1,924

354

1,278

3,556

964,333

205


	At December 31, 2021
													90 DAYS
			30 – 59		60 – 89								PAST DUE
			DAYS		DAYS		90 DAYS		TOTAL		TOTAL		AND STILL
	CURRENT		PAST DUE		PAST DUE		PAST DUE		PAST DUE		LOANS		ACCRUING

	(IN THOUSANDS)
Commercial and industrial	$	133,918	$	14	$	250	$	—	$	264	$	134,182	$	—
Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)		17,311		—		—		—		—		17,311		—
Commercial loans secured by owner occupied real estate		99,454		—		190		—		190		99,644		—
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate		428,790		2,035		—		—		2,035		430,825		—
Real estate – residential mortgage		283,178		2,449		1,240		1,129		4,818		287,996		—
Consumer		14,938		151		7		—		158		15,096		—
Total	$	977,589	$	4,649	$	1,687	$	1,129	$	7,465	$	985,054	$	—

An allowance for loan losses (“ALL”) is maintained to support loan growth and cover charge-offs from the loan portfolio. The ALL is based on management’s continuing evaluation of the risk characteristics and credit quality of the loan portfolio, assessment of current economic conditions, diversification and size of the portfolio, adequacy of collateral, past and anticipated loss experience, and the amount of non-performing loans.

Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are analyzed with general allowances being made as appropriate. For general allowances, historical loss trends are used in the estimation of losses in the current portfolio. These historical loss amounts are complemented by consideration of other qualitative factors.

Management tracks the historical net charge-off activity at each risk rating grade level for the entire commercial portfolio and at the aggregate level for the consumer, residential mortgage and small business portfolios. A historical charge-off factor is calculated utilizing a rolling 12 consecutive historical quarters for the commercial portfolios. This historical charge-off factor for the consumer, residential mortgage and small business portfolios is based on a three-year historical average of actual loss experience.

The Company uses a comprehensive methodology and procedural discipline to maintain an ALL to absorb inherent losses in the loan portfolio. The Company believes this is a critical accounting policy since it involves significant estimates and judgments. The allowance consists of three elements: (1) an allowance established on specifically

identified problem loans, (2) formula driven general reserves established for loan categories based upon historical loss experience and other qualitative factors which include delinquency, non-performing and TDR loans, loan trends, economic trends, concentrations of credit, trends in loan volume, experience and depth of management, examination and audit results, effects of any changes in lending policies, and trends in policy, financial information, and documentation exceptions, and (3) a general risk reserve which provides support for variance from our assessment of the previously listed qualitative factors, provides protection against credit risks resulting from other inherent risk factors contained in the Company’s loan portfolio, and recognizes the model and estimation risk associated with the specific and formula driven allowances. The qualitative factors used in the formula driven general reserves are evaluated quarterly (and revised if necessary) by the Company’s management to establish allocations which accommodate each of the listed risk factors.

“Pass” rated credits are segregated from “Criticized” and “Classified” credits for the application of qualitative factors.

Management reviews the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis using a defined, consistently applied process in order to make appropriate and timely adjustments to the ALL. When information confirms all or part of specific loans to be uncollectible, these amounts are promptly charged off against the ALL.