XML 25 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
General
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
General

(1)General. OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (the “Holding Company”) is a one-bank holding company and owns 100% of OptimumBank (the “Bank”), a Florida-chartered commercial bank. The Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries are OB Real Estate Management, LLC, OB Real Estate Holdings, LLC, OB Real Estate Holding 1503, LLC, OB Real Estate Holdings 1645, OB Real Estate Holdings 1616, OB Real Estate Holdings 1710, OB Real Estate Holdings 1692, and OB Real Estate Holdings 1704 (the “Real Estate Holding Subsidiaries”). The Holding Company’s only business is the operation of the Bank and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). The Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Bank offers a variety of commercial banking services to individual and corporate customers through its three banking offices located in Broward County, Florida. The Real Estate Holding Subsidiaries are primarily engaged in holding and disposing of foreclosed real estate. OB Real Estate Management, LLC, OB Real Estate Holdings, LLC and OB Real Estate Holdings 1503, LLC had no activity in 2014 or 2013.

 

In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company contain all adjustments (consisting principally of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position at June 30, 2014, and the results of operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

 

Going Concern Status. In prior years, the Company suffered losses from operations and continuing high levels of noninterest expenses. The Bank is subject to a Consent Order which requires the maintenance at a 12% total risk-based capital ratio. At June 30, 2014, the Bank’s total risk-based capital ratio of 9.47% is below the 12% level required by the Consent Order. As of June 30, 2014, the Bank needed approximately $2.3 million in additional capital to comply with the 12% total risk-based capital requirement of the Consent Order. The Company has taken certain actions which are expected to increase operating profits and improve capital ratios as follows:

 

The  Company has identified certain structural or contract related expenses that previously adversely impacted the Company’s ability to achieve core operational profitability. These were: (i) $20 million in long term Federal Home Loan Bank Advances with above market interest rates that were extinguished in December 2013 and replaced with lower interest rate advances. As a result of this restructuring, borrowing interest expense in 2014 and through the maturity of the new advances will be reduced annually by approximately $1.1 million; (ii) the Company’s Directors and Officers insurance was replaced with a policy from another insurance carrier. Annual expected savings totaling approximately $130,000, with no change in deductible or areas covered; and (iii) the contract for core system processing is also being reviewed with additional savings anticipated. In addition, as part of the Company’s strategic planning process, other initiatives are being developed to achieve branch and operational efficiencies.

 

The Company sold 714,286 shares of common stock for an aggregate amount of $800,000 on July 1, 2014. The Company is in the process of raising additional capital. It is anticipated that this effort will raise between $3 million and $4 million in common shares to both existing and new investors. A formal Plan, including necessary shareholder approval, to achieve the 8% and 12% targets was completed in the second quarter of 2014. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in its efforts to raise capital.

 

Management continues to forecast the Company to be profitable for 2014 unless it incurs unforeseen loan loss provisions. Management has considered these factors in evaluating the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and believes the Company will be able to meet all of its financial obligations and continue to operate as a going concern at least through June 30, 2015.

 

Comprehensive Income (Loss). Generally accepted accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net earnings (loss). Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet, such items along with net earnings (loss), are components of comprehensive income (loss). The only component of other comprehensive income (loss) is the net change in the unrealized gain on the securities available for sale.

 

Income Taxes. The Company assessed its earnings history and trends and its estimate of future earnings, and determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized at June 30, 2014. Accordingly, a valuation allowance was recorded against the net deferred tax asset. However, management will evaluate the Company’s projected future taxable income at each quarter’s end and believes sufficient taxable income to allow for reversal of the valuation allowance may occur in 2015.

 

Recent Accounting Standards Update. In January 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-04, “Receivables-Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure”, which is intended to clarify when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the loan should be derecognized and the real estate recognized. These amendments clarify that when in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either: (a) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure; or (b) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. Additional disclosures are required. The amendments are effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2015.

 

In June 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-11, “Transfers and Servicing - Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures.” ASU 2014-11 requires, among other things, two accounting changes. First, the amendments in this update change the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions to secured borrowing accounting. Second, for repurchase financing arrangements, the amendments require separate accounting for a transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty, which will result in secured borrowing accounting for the repurchase agreement. ASU 2014-11 is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2014. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have any impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. 

 

 In June 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-12, “Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period.” ASU 2014-12 requires, among other things, that a performance target that affects vesting and could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. ASU 2014-12 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have any impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

 

Recent Regulatory Developments

Basel III Legislation. On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) approved the final rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. banks. Under the final rules, minimum requirements will increase for both the quantity and quality of capital held by the Bank. The rules include a new common equity Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 4.5% and a common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets. The final rules also raise the minimum ratio of Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0% to 6.0% and require a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%. The final rules also implement strict eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments. On July 9, 2013, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) also approved, as an interim final rule, the regulatory capital requirements for U.S. banks, following the actions of the FRB. The FDIC’s rule is identical in substance to the final rules issued by the FRB.

 

The phase-in period for the final rules will begin for the Company on January 1, 2015, with full compliance with all of the final rule’s requirements phased in over a multi-year schedule. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of the final rules and their expected impact.