XML 28 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.10.0.1

LINE OF CREDIT | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2018
Debt Disclosure [Abstract] |
LINE OF CREDIT | (8) LINE OF CREDIT The Company had an asset-backed revolving credit facility under a Loan and Security Agreement as amended, (the “Triumph Agreement”) with Triumph Healthcare Finance. This credit facility was paid in full on June 30, 2017. The Triumph Agreement contained certain customary restrictive and financial covenants for asset-backed credit facilities. The Company had not been in compliance with the financial covenants under the Triumph Agreement since July 2014. On July 14, 2014, the Company received notice from the Lender of an event of default under the Triumph Agreement. The notice relates to the Company’s default under the minimum debt service coverage ratio requirement for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 and certain other alleged defaults. The Lender notified the Company that it was exercising its default remedies under the Triumph Agreement, including, among others, accelerating the repayment of all outstanding obligations under the Triumph Agreement (outstanding principal and accrued interest) and collecting the Company’s bank deposits to apply towards the outstanding obligations. As of December 31, 2017, $0 was outstanding under the Triumph Agreement as compared to $2.8 million at December 31, 2016. Subsequent to the default and prior to the pay off, the effective interest rate under the Triumph Agreement was approximately 11.0% ( 6.75 % interest rate plus 3% additional default interest rate and 1.25% fees). The Triumph Agreement required monthly interest payments in arrears on the first day of each month. The Triumph Agreement originally matured on December 19, 2014. Triumph had agreed to forbear from the exercise of its rights and remedies under the terms of the Triumph Agreement through June 30, 2017, pursuant to the terms of the March 31, 2017 forbearance agreement. In connection with the agreement entered into on March 28, 2016, the Lender suspended this monthly payment requirement for February, March and April of 2016 up to an aggregate cap of $250,000, in exchange for the issuance of a warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company used the Black Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of the stock warrant, using the following assumptions:
Contractual term |  | 5.0 years |
Volatility |  |  | 122.44 | %
Risk-free interest rate |  |  | 1.48 | %
Dividend yield |  |  | 1.44 | %
During 2016 the Company recorded bank fee expense related to this stock warrant of $15,000.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_DebtDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for short-term debt. + References Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 470 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2208564 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_ShortTermDebtTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration