XML 22 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.5.0.2

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Sep. 30, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract] |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies A. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS SIFCO Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries are engaged in the production of forgings and machined components primarily in the Aerospace and Energy ("A&E") market. The Company’s operations are conducted in a single business segment, "SIFCO" or "Company." In July 2015, SIFCO completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding equity of C Blade S.p.A. Forging & Manufacturing (“Maniago", previously disclosed as "C*Blade”), located in Maniago, Italy, from Riello Investimenti Partners SGR S.p.A., Giorgio Visentini, Giorgio Frassini, Giancarlo Sclabi and Matteo Talmassons. Financial information relating to the Company's acquisition in fiscal 2015 is referenced in Note 11. B. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for all the Company’s U.S. operations and its Irish subsidiary. For these operations, all gains and losses from completed currency transactions are included in income currently. The functional currency for the Company's other non-U.S. subsidiaries is the Euro. Assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange at the end of the period, and revenues and expenses are translated using average rates of exchange. Foreign currency translation adjustments are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity. C. CASH EQUIVALENTS The Company considers all highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. A substantial majority of the Company’s cash and cash equivalent bank balances are within federally insured limits at September 30, 2016, however, balances exceed limits at September 30, 2015. D. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK Receivables are presented net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $706 and $1,127 at September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Accounts receivable outstanding longer than the contractual payment terms are considered past due. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible. During fiscal 2016 and 2015, $581 and $0, respectively, of accounts receivable were written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. Bad debt expense totaled $359 and $487 in fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, respectively. Most of the Company’s receivables represent trade receivables due from manufacturers of turbine engines and aircraft components as well as turbine engine overhaul companies located throughout the world, including a significant concentration of U.S. based companies. In fiscal 2016, 21% of the Company’s consolidated net sales were from two of its largest customers; and 46% of the Company's consolidated net sales were from the four largest customers and their direct subcontractors, which individually accounted for 12%, 12%, 11% and 11%, of consolidated net sales, respectively. In fiscal 2015, 12% of the Company’s consolidated net sales were from one of its largest customers; and 38% of the Company's consolidated net sales were from two of the largest customers and their direct subcontractors which individually accounted for 22%, and 16%, of consolidated net sales, respectively. No other single customer or group represented greater than 10% of total net sales in fiscal 2016 and 2015. At September 30, 2016, two of the Company’s largest customers had outstanding net accounts receivable which individually accounted for 14% and 11% of the total net accounts receivable; and four of the largest customers and direct subcontractors had outstanding net accounts receivable which accounted for 15%, 13%, 12% and 11% of total net accounts receivable, respectively. At September 30, 2015, one of the Company’s largest customers had outstanding net accounts receivable which accounted for 11% of total net accounts receivable; and two of the largest customers and direct subcontractors had outstanding net accounts receivable which accounted for 18% and 16% of total, net receivables, respectively. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial conditions. The Company believes its allowance for doubtful accounts is sufficient based on the credit exposures outstanding at September 30, 2016. E. INVENTORY VALUATION Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. For a portion of the Company's inventory, cost is determined using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. For approximately 44% and 38% of the Company’s inventories at September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, the LIFO method is used to value the Company’s inventories. The first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method is used to value the remainder of the Company’s inventories. The Company maintains allowances for obsolete and excess inventory. The Company evaluates its allowances for obsolete and excess inventory each quarter, and requires at a minimum that reserves be established based on an analysis of the age of the inventory. In addition, if the Company identifies specific obsolescence, other than that identified by the aging criteria, an additional reserve will be recognized. Specific obsolescence and excess reserve requirements may arise due to technological or market changes, or based on cancellation of an order. The Company’s reserves for obsolete and excess inventory were $3,308 and $3,022 at September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. F. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is generally computed using the straight-line method. Depreciation is provided in amounts sufficient to amortize the cost of the assets over their estimated useful lives. Depreciation provisions are based on estimated useful lives: (i) buildings, including building improvements - 5 to 40 years; (ii) machinery and equipment, including office and computer equipment - 3 to 20 years; (iii) software - 3 to 7 years (included in machinery and equipment); and (iv) leasehold improvements - remaining life or length of the lease (included in buildings). The Company's property, plant and equipment assets by major asset class at September 30 consist of:
|  | 2016 |  | 2015
Property, plant and equipment: |  |  |  |
Land |  | $ | 979 |  |  | $ | 975 |
Buildings |  | 15,393 |  |  | 15,446 |
Machinery and equipment |  | 82,665 |  |  | 80,687 |
Total property, plant and equipment |  | 99,037 |  |  | 97,108 |
Accumulated depreciation |  | 50,079 |  |  | 42,243 |
Property, plant and equipment, net |  | $ | 48,958 |  |  | $ | 54,865 |
The Company reviews the carrying value of its long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment, at least annually or when events and circumstances warrant such a review. This review is performed using estimates of future undiscounted cash flows, which include proceeds from disposal of assets. If the carrying value of a long-lived asset is greater than the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, then the long-lived asset is considered impaired and an impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. There have been no asset impairment charges as it relates to the above assets during fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015. If an asset is determined to be impaired, the carrying value of such assets is reduced to its net realizable value. The gain/loss on disposal of operating assets is included as a separate line item in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Depreciation expense was $8,173 and $6,048 in fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company’s Irish subsidiary sold its operating business in June 2007, but retained ownership of its Cork, Ireland facility. This property is subject to a lease arrangement with the acquirer of the business that expires in June 2027. Rental income is earned in quarterly installments of $103. At September 30, 2016 and 2015, the carrying value of the property was $1,496 (accumulated depreciation of $1,437) and $1,570 (accumulated depreciation of $1,511), respectively. Rental income of $413 was recognized in each of fiscal years 2016 and 2015, respectively, and is recorded in other income, net on the consolidated statements of operations. G. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets of an acquired business. Goodwill is subject to annual impairment testing and the Company has selected July 31 as the annual impairment testing date. The Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, including goodwill. If so, then a two-step impairment test is used to identify potential goodwill impairment. The first step of the goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of a reporting unit (as defined) with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is not considered impaired, and the second step of the goodwill impairment test is not required. The second step measures the amount of impairment, if any, by comparing the carrying value of the goodwill associated with a reporting unit to the implied fair value of the goodwill derived from the estimated overall fair value of the reporting unit and the individual fair values of the other assets and liabilities of the reporting unit. See Note 3 to for further discussion of the July 31, 2016 annual impairment test results. Intangible assets consist of identifiable intangibles acquired or recognized in the accounting for the acquisition of a business and include such items as a trade name, a non-compete agreement, below market lease, customer relationships and order backlog. Intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives ranging from one year to ten years. H. NET LOSS PER SHARE The Company’s net loss per basic share has been computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Net loss per diluted share is the same as net loss per basic share. The dilutive effect of the Company’s stock options, restricted shares and performance shares were as follows:
|  | September 30,
|  | 2016 |  | 2015
Loss from continuing operations |  | $ | (11,335 | ) |  | $ | (3,581 | )
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |  | — |  |  | 709 |
Net loss |  | $ | (11,335 | ) |  | $ | (2,872 | )
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (basic) |  | 5,475 |  |  | 5,438 |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (diluted) |  | 5,475 |  |  | 5,438 |
Net loss per share – basic |  |  |  |
Continuing operations |  | $ | (2.07 | ) |  | $ | (0.66 | )
Discontinued operations |  | — |  |  | 0.13 |
Net loss per share |  | $ | (2.07 | ) |  | $ | (0.53 | )
Net loss per share – diluted: |  |  |  |
Continuing operations |  | $ | (2.07 | ) |  | $ | (0.66 | )
Discontinued operations |  | — |  |  | 0.13 |
Net loss per share |  | $ | (2.07 | ) |  | $ | (0.53 | )
Anti-dilutive weighted-average common shares excluded from calculation of diluted earnings per share |  | 32 |  |  | 27 |
I. REVENUE RECOGNITION Revenue is generally recognized for products shipped or services performed when the following criteria are met: 1.) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; 2.) delivery has occurred; 3.) an established sales price has been set with the customer; and 4.) collectibility of the amounts due from the sale is reasonably assured. J. CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS Capital leases are accounted for as the acquisition of an asset and the commitment of an obligation by the lessee and as a sale or financing by the lessor. All other leases are accounted for as operating leases. K. IMPACT OF RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS In November 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,” which requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as non-current in the statement of financial position. This ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company has elected to early adopt this ASU prospectively for the year ended September 30, 2016, as is permitted under the standard. Due to the prospective treatment, prior periods presented in these financial statements have not been adjusted. L. IMPACT OF NEWLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, which amends certain cash flow issues which apply to all entities required to present a statement of cash flow. The amendments are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact it may have on its consolidated financial statements. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” ASU 2014-09 completes the joint effort by the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board to improve financial reporting by creating common revenue recognition guidance for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net).” The ASU 2016-08 clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing.” This ASU 2016-10 clarifies the implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations. These ASUs, along with subsequent updates, apply to all companies that enter into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services, and are effective for public entities for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, but not before interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Companies have the choice to apply these ASUs either retrospectively to each reporting period presented or by recognizing the cumulative effect of applying these standards at the date of initial application and not adjusting comparative information. The Company is planning a bottoms up approach to analyze the standard's impact on its revenues by looking at historical policies and practices and identifying the differences from applying the new standard to its revenue stream. The Company has not selected a transition date or method nor has it determined the effect of the standard to its consolidated financial statements. In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, "Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern," which the intent is to define the Company's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. This ASU will be effective for the Company as of October 1, 2017. The Company will prospectively apply the guidance to applicable conditions. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” This ASU requires lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset on the balance sheet and aligns many of the underlying principles of the new lessor model with those in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of ASU 2016-02 and has not yet determined its impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements. On March 30, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which makes a number of changes meant to simplify and improve accounting for share-based payments. The ASU will be effective for the Company for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently considering early adoption of ASU 2016-09 in the next reporting period, as is permitted under the standard and has not yet determined the impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements. M. USE OF ESTIMATES Accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. require management to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities, at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period in preparing these financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In fiscal 2015, the Company changed how it estimates its workers' compensation reserve. The Company uses a third party actuary to evaluate its reserves annually. Effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company changed to a new third party administrator that also evaluates the reserve on a monthly basis. The change in administrators resulted in a reduction in the Company's reserve and a corresponding decrease in expense of approximately $400. The change is reflected in the Company's fiscal 2015 results. N. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The Company periodically uses interest rate swap agreements to reduce risk related to variable-rate debt, which is subject to changes in market rates of interest. Interest rate swaps are designated as a cash flow hedges. At September 30, 2016, the Company held one interest rate swap with a notional amount of $8,214. Cash flows related to the interest rate swap agreement are included in interest expense. The Company’s interest rate swap agreement and its variable-rate term debt were based upon LIBOR. At September 30, 2016, the Company’s interest rate swap agreement qualified as a fully effective cash flow hedge against the Company’s variable-rate term note and its mark-to-market valuation is a $30 liability at September 30, 2016. As of September 30, 2015, no interest rate swap agreements were in place. O. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Research and development costs are expensed as they are incurred. Research and development expense was nominal in fiscal 2016 and 2015. P. DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS Debt issuance costs are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related debt. Amortization of deferred financing costs is included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Q. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss as shown on the consolidated balance sheets at September 30 are as follows:
| 2016 |  | 2015
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income tax benefit of $0 and $0, respectively | $ | (5,623 | ) |  | $ | (5,731 | )
Net retirement plan liability adjustment, net of income tax benefit of ($3,758) and ($3,758), respectively | (7,197 | ) |  | (6,257 | )
Interest rate swap agreement, net of income tax benefit of $0 and $0, respectively | (30 | ) |  | — |
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss | $ | (12,850 | ) |  | $ | (11,988 | )
The following table provides additional details of the amounts recognized into net earnings from accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
| Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment |  | Retirement Plan Liability Adjustment |  | Interest Rates Swap Adjustment |  | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Balance at September 30, 2014 | $ | (5,851 | ) |  | $ | (4,757 | ) |  | $ | (5 | ) |  | $ | (10,613 | )
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 120 |  |  | (1,846 | ) |  | 5 |  |  | (1,721 | )
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | — |  |  | 346 |  |  | — |  |  | 346 |
Net current-period other comprehensive loss | $ | 120 |  |  | $ | (1,500 | ) |  | $ | 5 |  |  | $ | (1,375 | )
Balance at September 30, 2015 | $ | (5,731 | ) |  | $ | (6,257 | ) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (11,988 | )
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 108 |  |  | (1,991 | ) |  | (30 | ) |  | (1,913 | )
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | — |  |  | 1,051 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,051 |
Net current-period other comprehensive loss | 108 |  |  | (940 | ) |  | (30 | ) |  | (862 | )
Balance at September 30, 2016 | $ | (5,623 | ) |  | $ | (7,197 | ) |  | $ | (30 | ) |  | $ | (12,850 | )
The following table reflects the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the Company for September 30, 2016 and 2015:
|  | Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss |  |
Details about accumulated other comprehensive loss components |  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | Affected line item in the Consolidated Statement of Operations
Amortization of Retirement plan liability: |  |  |  |  |  |
Net actuarial loss |  | 828 |  |  | 545 |  |  | (1)
Settlements/curtailments |  | 223 |  |  | — |  |  | (1)
|  | 1,051 |  |  | 545 |  |  | Total before taxes
|  | — |  |  | (199 | ) |  | Income tax expense
|  | $ | 1,051 |  |  | $ | 346 |  |  | Net of taxes
(1) These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. See Note 7 - Retirement benefit plans for further information. R. INCOME TAXES The Company files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return and tax returns in various state and local jurisdictions. The Company’s Irish and Italian subsidiaries also file tax returns in the respective jurisdictions. The Company provides deferred income taxes for the temporary difference between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Such taxes are measured using the enacted tax rates that are assumed to be in effect when the differences reverse. Deductible temporary differences result principally from recording certain expenses in the financial statements in excess of amounts currently deductible for tax purposes. Taxable temporary differences result principally from tax depreciation in excess of book depreciation. The Company evaluates for uncertain tax positions taken at each balance sheet date. The Company recognizes the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest cumulative benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. The Company's policy for interest and/or penalties related to underpayments of income taxes is to include interest and penalties in tax expenses. The Company maintains a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets when management believes it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset may not be realized. Changes in valuation allowances are recorded in the period of change. In determining whether a valuation allowance is warranted, the Company evaluates factors such as prior earnings history, expected future earnings, carry-back and carry-forward periods and tax strategies that could potentially enhance the likelihood of the realization of a deferred tax asset. S. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company utilizes certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. Based on the examination of the inputs used in the valuation techniques, the Company is required to provide the following information according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value will be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories: Level 1 - Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities Level 2 - Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The book value of cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and revolving credit facilities are considered to be representative of their fair values because of their short maturities. Fair value measurements of non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities are primarily used in goodwill, other intangible assets and long-lived assets impairment analysis, the valuation of acquired intangibles and in the valuation of assets held for sale. Goodwill and intangible assets are valued using Level 3 inputs. T. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION Share-based compensation is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period (generally the vesting period). Share-based expense includes expense related to restricted shares and performance shares issued under the Company's 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The Company recognizes share-based expense within selling, general, and administrative expense. U. SHIPPING AND HANDLING COSTS The Company classifies all amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling as revenue and reflects shipping and handling costs in cost of sales. V. RECLASSIFICATIONS Certain amounts in prior years may have been reclassified to conform to the 2016 consolidated financial statement presentation. In fiscal 2016, the Company revised its classification within the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows by moving prior year amount of $506 of other long-term liabilities caption from changes in operating assets and liabilities to adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities as these items are non-cash item and are not a part of operating assets and liabilities.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_AccountingPoliciesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for all significant accounting policies of the reporting entity. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 6 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=68058157&loc=d3e18861-107790 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 3 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=68058157&loc=d3e18780-107790 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=68058157&loc=d3e18726-107790 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=68058157&loc=d3e18743-107790 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 5 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=68058157&loc=d3e18854-107790 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_SignificantAccountingPoliciesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration