XML 21 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.5.0.2

LIQUIDITY | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2016
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] |
LIQUIDITY |
2. | LIQUIDITY
As of June 30, 2016, the Company has a working capital deficit of $9,509 and an accumulated deficit of $124,523. Additionally, the Company incurred a net loss of $14,818 for the six months ended June 30, 2016. During 2015 and 2016, compliance was not maintained with certain financial ratio covenants in the credit agreement with Wells Fargo as discussed in Note 7. In July 2015, Wells Fargo agreed to enter into a third amendment to the credit agreement and provided waivers for non-compliance with the financial ratio covenants for the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2015. Commencing in September 2015, the Company completed the following actions which are expected to improve the Company’s operating results in 2016 and enable the Company to survive the current oil and gas industry price environment:
| · | During the third quarter of 2015, the Company began to implement restructuring actions to reduce corporate overhead through a reduction in the size of the Company’s workforce from 14 employees at the end of 2014 to one employee by January 2016. Additionally, in December 2015 the Company completed a move of its corporate headquarters to Denver, Colorado for better access to financial services and to improve access to oil and gas deal flow. Management expects its restructuring and other cost-cutting actions will result in an overhead reduction of approximately $4,000 on an annualized basis. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company began to realize the benefits of these actions as aggregate general and administrative expenses were reduced by more than 50% as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015.
| · | As discussed in Note 5, in February 2016 the Company completed the disposition of its mining segment, including the Keystone Mine, a related water treatment plant and other related properties. A significant objective for completing the disposition was to improve future profitability through the elimination of the obligations to operate the water treatment plant and mine holding costs, which are expected to result in estimated annual cash savings of $3,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company began to realize the benefits of this disposition as aggregate operating expenses associated with the mining segment were reduced from $1,459 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 to $373 for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Management believes the disposition of the Company’s mining segment is a major step in the transformation of U.S. Energy to solely focus on its existing oil and gas business.
| · | In April 2016, Wells Fargo provided a waiver for non-compliance with the covenants in the credit agreement for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2015. As discussed in Note 7, in August 2016 Wells Fargo agreed to enter into a fourth amendment to the credit agreement that provides for, among other things, a limited waiver of the negative financial covenants as it relates to the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016. Management believes that Wells Fargo will not demand repayment until an alternative lender can be obtained. However, no assurance can be provided and the entire principal balance of $6,000 is classified as a current liability as of June 30, 2016, due to management’s expectation that further non-compliance with the financial ratio covenants is likely for the third quarter of 2016. The ongoing availability of borrowings under this credit agreement through the maturity date of July 30, 2017, or the receipt of funding from alternative sources, is critical to the Company’s ability to survive until oil and gas prices recover.
The Company expects that its share of the drilling and completion costs associated with proved undeveloped oil and gas properties that it will be required to fund is approximately $1,000 in 2017 and $3,800 in 2018. However, the specific timing and amount of these expenditures is controlled by the operators of the respective properties and can change based on a variety of economic and operating conditions. The Company’s ability to finance these planned capital expenditures is contingent upon its ability to repay $6,000 of outstanding borrowings under the Wells Fargo credit agreement and to obtain alternative sources of financing. In order to reduce the financing commitments, the Company intends to pursue sales of non-core assets to generate near-term liquidity. Alternatives that may be pursued include selling or joint venturing an interest in certain oil and gas properties, selling real estate assets in Wyoming, selling marketable equity securities, issuing shares of common stock for cash or as consideration for acquisitions, and other alternatives, as the Company determines how to best fund its capital programs and meet its financial obligations. As of June 30, 2016, the Company had cash and equivalents of $1,360. Management believes approximately $7,000 of annualized overhead and mining expense reductions have poised the Company to survive the current low commodity price environment. Management believes the Company’s new singular industry focus, combined with attractive producing properties and a low-cost overhead structure, makes the Company an attractive vehicle to partner with for potential investors and lenders during this industry downturn and low commodity price environment. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to complete future financings, dispositions or acquisitions on acceptable terms or at all.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_OrganizationConsolidationAndPresentationOfFinancialStatementsAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure when substantial doubt is raised about the ability to continue as a going concern. Includes, but is not limited to, principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the ability to continue as a going concern, management's evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the ability to meet its obligations, and management's plans that alleviated or are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the ability to continue as a going concern. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 205 -SubTopic 40 -Section 50 -Paragraph 13 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=64819266&loc=SL51888449-203568 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 205 -SubTopic 40 -Section 50 -Paragraph 12 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=64819266&loc=SL51888443-203568 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_SubstantialDoubtAboutGoingConcernTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration