XML 28 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.10.0.1

Acquisitions | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2018
Business Combinations [Abstract] |
Acquisition | Acquisitions China Mist Brands, Inc. On October 11, 2016, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of China Mist, a provider of flavored and unflavored iced and hot teas. As part of the transaction, the Company assumed the lease on China Mist’s existing 17,400 square foot facility in Scottsdale, Arizona which is terminable upon twelve months’ notice. The Company acquired China Mist for aggregate purchase consideration of $12.2 million, consisting of $11.2 million in cash paid at closing including estimated working capital adjustments of $0.4 million, post-closing final working capital adjustments of $0.6 million, and up to $0.5 million in contingent consideration to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the calendar years of 2017 or 2018. This contingent earnout liability was estimated to have a fair value of $0.5 million as of the closing date and was recorded in other long-term liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2017. During fiscal 2018, the Company recorded a change in the estimated fair value of contingent earnout consideration of $(0.5) million, resulting in a balance of zero as the Company does not expect the contingent sales levels to be reached. In fiscal 2017, the Company incurred $0.2 million in transaction costs related to the China Mist acquisition, consisting primarily of legal and accounting expenses, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the Company's consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. No transaction costs were incurred in fiscal 2018 relating to the China Mist acquisition. The financial effect of this acquisition was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company has not presented pro forma results of operations for the acquisition because it is not significant to the Company's consolidated results of operations. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. The fair value of consideration transferred was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date, with the remaining unallocated amount recorded as goodwill. The purchase price allocation is final. The following table summarizes the final allocation of consideration transferred as of the acquisition date:
(In thousands) | Fair Value |  | Estimated Useful Life (years)
Cash paid, net of cash acquired | $ | 11,183 |  |  |
Post-closing final working capital adjustments | 553 |  |  |
Contingent consideration | 500 |  |  |
Total consideration | $ | 12,236 |  |  |
Accounts receivable | $ | 811 |  |  |
Inventory | 544 |  |  |
Prepaid assets | 48 |  |  |
Property, plant and equipment | 189 |  |  |
Goodwill | 2,927 |  |  |
Intangible assets: |  |  |
Recipes | 930 |  |  | 7
Non-compete agreement | 100 |  |  | 5
Customer relationships | 2,000 |  |  | 10
Trade name/Trademark—indefinite-lived | 5,070 |  |  |
Accounts payable | (383 | ) |  |
Total consideration, net of cash acquired | $ | 12,236 |  |  |
In connection with this acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $2.9 million, which is deductible for tax purposes. The Company also recorded $3.0 million in finite-lived intangible assets that included recipes, a non-compete agreement and customer relationships and $5.1 million in indefinite-lived trade name/trademark. The weighted average amortization period for the finite-lived intangible assets is 8.9 years. See Note 14. The determination of the fair value of intangible assets acquired was primarily based on significant inputs not observable in an active market and thus represent Level 3 fair value measurements as defined under GAAP. The fair value assigned to the recipes was determined utilizing the replacement cost method, which captures the direct cost of the development effort plus lost profits over the time to re-create the recipes. The fair value assigned to the non-compete agreement was determined utilizing the with and without method. Under the with and without method, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated based on the difference in projected earnings with the agreement in place versus projected earnings based on starting with no agreement in place. Revenue and earnings projections were significant inputs into estimating the value of China Mist's non-compete agreement. The fair value assigned to the customer relationships was determined based on management's estimate of the retention rate and utilizing certain benchmarks. Revenue and earnings projections were also significant inputs into estimating the value of customer relationships. The fair value assigned to the trade name/trademark was determined utilizing a multi-period excess earnings approach. Under the multi-period excess earnings approach, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated to be the present value of future earnings attributable to the asset and this method utilizes revenue and cost projections including an assumed contributory asset charge. During the Company's annual intangible asset impairment test as of January 31, 2018 and assessment of the recoverability of certain finite-lived intangible assets, the Company determined that the fair value of certain China Mist intangible assets was lower than the carrying value. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge in fiscal 2018. See Note 14. West Coast Coffee Company, Inc. On February 7, 2017, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of West Coast Coffee, a coffee roaster and distributor with a focus on the convenience store, grocery and foodservice channels. As part of the transaction, the Company entered into a three-year lease on West Coast Coffee’s existing 20,400 square foot facility in Hillsboro, Oregon, which expires January 31, 2020, and assumed leases on six branch warehouses consisting of an aggregate of 24,150 square feet in Oregon, California and Nevada, expiring on various dates through November 2020. The Company acquired West Coast Coffee for aggregate purchase consideration of $15.5 million, which included $14.7 million in cash paid at closing including working capital adjustments of $1.2 million, post-closing final working capital adjustments of $(0.2) million, and up to $1.0 million in contingent consideration to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the twenty-four months following the closing. This contingent earnout liability was estimated to have a fair value of $0.6 million and is recorded in other current liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2018 and in other long-term liabilities on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2017. The earnout is estimated to be paid within twenty-four months following the closing. In fiscal 2017, the Company incurred $0.3 million in transaction costs related to the West Coast Coffee acquisition, consisting primarily of legal and accounting expenses, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the Company's consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. No transaction costs were incurred in fiscal 2018 relating to the West Coast Coffee acquisition. The financial effect of this acquisition was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company has not presented pro forma results of operations for the acquisition because it is not significant to the Company's consolidated results of operations. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. The fair value of consideration transferred was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date, with the remaining unallocated amount recorded as goodwill. The purchase price allocation is final. The following table summarizes the final allocation of consideration transferred as of the acquisition date:
(In thousands) | Fair Value |  | Estimated Useful Life (years)
Cash paid, net of cash acquired | $ | 14,671 |  |  |
Post-closing final working capital adjustments | (218 | ) |  |
Fair value of contingent consideration | 600 |  |  |
Total consideration | $ | 15,053 |  |  |
Accounts receivable | $ | 956 |  |  |
Inventory | 910 |  |  |
Prepaid assets | 16 |  |  |
Property, plant and equipment | 1,546 |  |  |
Goodwill | 7,630 |  |  |
Intangible assets: |  |  |
Non-compete agreements | 100 |  |  | 5
Customer relationships | 4,400 |  |  | 10
Trade name—finite-lived | 260 |  |  | 7
Brand name—finite-lived | 250 |  |  | 1.7
Accounts payable | (833 | ) |  |
Other liabilities | (182 | ) |  |
Total consideration, net of cash acquired | $ | 15,053 |  |  |
In connection with this acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $7.6 million, which is deductible for tax purposes. The Company also recorded $5.0 million in finite-lived intangible assets that included non-compete agreements, customer relationships, a trade name and a brand name. The weighted average amortization period for the finite-lived intangible assets is 9.3 years. See Note 14. The determination of the fair value of intangible assets acquired was primarily based on significant inputs not observable in an active market and thus represent Level 3 fair value measurements as defined under GAAP. The fair value assigned to the non-compete agreements was determined utilizing the with and without method. Under the with and without method, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated based on the difference in projected earnings with the agreements in place versus projected earnings based on starting with no agreements in place. Revenue and earnings projections were significant inputs into estimating the value of West Coast Coffee's non-compete agreements. The fair value assigned to the customer relationships was determined utilizing a multi-period excess earnings approach. Under the multi-period excess earnings approach, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated to be the present value of future earnings attributable to the asset and this method utilizes revenue and cost projections including an assumed contributory asset charge. The fair values assigned to the trade name and the brand name were determined utilizing the relief from royalty method. The relief from royalty method is based on the premise that the intangible asset owner would be willing to pay a royalty rate to license the subject asset. The analysis involves forecasting revenue over the life of the asset, applying a royalty rate and a tax rate, and then discounting the savings back to present value at an appropriate discount rate. Boyd Coffee Company On October 2, 2017 (“Closing Date”), the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of Boyd Coffee, a coffee roaster and distributor with a focus on restaurants, hotels, and convenience stores on the West Coast of the United States. The acquired business of Boyd Coffee (the “Boyd Business”) is expected to add to the Company’s product portfolio, improve the Company's growth potential, deepen the Company’s distribution footprint and increase the Company's capacity utilization at its production facilities. At closing, as consideration for the purchase, the Company paid the Seller $38.9 million in cash from borrowings under its senior secured revolving credit facility (see Note 16), and issued to Boyd Coffee 14,700 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock, with a fair value of $11.8 million as of the Closing Date. Additionally, the Company held back $3.2 million in cash (“Holdback Cash Amount”) and 6,300 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (“Holdback Stock”) with a fair value of $4.8 million as of the Closing Date, for the satisfaction of any post-closing net working capital adjustment and to secure the Seller’s (and the other seller parties’) indemnification obligations under the purchase agreement. Any Holdback Cash Amount and Holdback Stock not used to satisfy any post-closing net working capital adjustment or any indemnification claims (including pending claims) will be released to the Seller on the 18-month anniversary of the Closing Date. In addition to the Holdback Cash, as part of the consideration for the purchase, at closing the Company held back $1.1 million in cash (the “Multiemployer Plan Holdback”) to pay, on behalf of the Seller, any assessment of withdrawal liability made against the Seller following the Closing Date in respect of the Seller’s multiemployer pension plan. As the Company has not made this payment as of June 30, 2018 and expects settling the pension liability will take greater than twelve months, the Multiemployer Plan Holdback is recorded in other long-term liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2018. See Note 20. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. The fair value of consideration transferred was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date, with the remaining unallocated amount recorded as goodwill. Although the purchase price allocation is final, the parties are in the process of determining the final net working capital under the purchase agreement. At June 30, 2018, the Company's best estimate of the post-closing net working capital adjustment is $(8.1) million, which is reflected in the final purchase price allocation set forth below. The following table summarizes the final allocation of consideration transferred as of the acquisition date:
(In thousands) | Fair Value |  | Estimated Useful Life (years)
Cash paid | $ | 38,871 |  |  |
Holdback Cash Amount | 3,150 |  |  |
Multiemployer Plan Holdback | 1,056 |  |  |
Fair value of Series A Preferred Stock (14,700 shares)(1) | 11,756 |  |  |
Fair value of Holdback Stock (6,300 shares)(1) | 4,825 |  |  |
Estimated post-closing net working capital adjustment | (8,059 | ) |  |
Total consideration | $ | 51,599 |  |  |
Accounts receivable | $ | 7,503 |  |  |
Inventory | 9,415 |  |  |
Prepaid expense and other assets | 1,951 |  |  |
Property, plant and equipment | 4,936 |  |  |
Goodwill | 25,395 |  |  |
Intangible assets: |  |  |
Customer relationships | 16,000 |  |  | 10
Trade name/trademark—indefinite-lived | 3,100 |  |  |
Accounts payable | (15,080 | ) |  |
Other liabilities | (1,621 | ) |  |
Total consideration | $ | 51,599 |  |  |
______________ (1) Fair value of Series A Preferred Stock and Holdback Stock as of the Closing Date, estimated as the sum of (a) the present value of the dividends payable thereon and (b) the stated value of the Series A Preferred Stock or Holdback Stock, as the case may be, adjusted for both the conversion premium and the discount for lack of marketability arising from conversion restrictions. In connection with this acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $25.4 million, which is deductible for tax purposes. The Company also recorded $16.0 million in finite-lived intangible assets that included customer relationships and $3.1 million in indefinite-lived intangible assets that included a trade name/trademark. The amortization period for the finite-lived intangible assets is 10.0 years. See Note 14. The determination of the fair value of intangible assets acquired was primarily based on significant inputs not observable in an active market and thus represent Level 3 fair value measurements as defined under GAAP. The fair value assigned to the customer relationships was determined based on management's estimate of the retention rate utilizing certain benchmarks. Revenue and earnings projections were also significant inputs into estimating the value of customer relationships. The fair value assigned to the trade name/trademark was determined utilizing a multi-period excess earnings approach. Under the multi-period excess earnings approach, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated to be the present value of future earnings attributable to the asset and this method utilizes revenue and cost projections including an assumed contributory asset charge. The following table presents the net sales and income before taxes from the Boyd Business operations that are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018:
(In thousands) |  | June 30, 2018
Net sales |  | $ | 67,385 |
Income before taxes |  | $ | 1,572 |
The Company considers the acquisition to be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and has provided certain pro forma disclosures pursuant to ASC 805, “Business Combinations.” The following table sets forth certain unaudited pro forma financial results for the Company for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, as if the acquisition of the Boyd Business was consummated on the same terms as of the first day of the applicable fiscal year.
|  | June 30,
(In thousands) |  | 2018 |  | 2017
Net sales |  | $ | 628,526 |  |  | $ | 636,969 |
(Loss) income before taxes |  | $ | (642 | ) |  | $ | 36,969 |
At closing, the parties entered into a transition services agreement where the Seller agreed to provide certain accounting, marketing, human resources, information technology, sales and distribution and other administrative support during a transition period of up to 12 months. The Company also entered into a co-manufacturing agreement with the Seller for a transition period of up to 12 months as the Company transitions manufacturing into its production facilities. Amounts paid by the Company to the Seller for these services totaled $25.4 million in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. The Company has incurred acquisition and integration costs related to the Boyd Business acquisition, consisting primarily of legal and consulting expenses and one-time payroll and benefit expenses of $7.6 million and $1.7 million during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, which are included in operating expenses in the Company's consolidated statements of operations.

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for a business combination (or series of individually immaterial business combinations) completed during the period, including background, timing, and recognized assets and liabilities. The disclosure may include leverage buyout transactions (as applicable). + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 805 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2303972 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_BusinessCombinationDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_BusinessCombinationsAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration