XML 17 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Fair Value Measurements
 9 Months Ended
Jun. 26, 2011
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS


FASB ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-level hierarchy of fair value measurements based on whether the inputs to those measurements are observable or unobservable which consists of the following levels:
 
Level 1 - Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;


Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets; and


Level 3 - Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable.
 
The following table summarizes the financial instruments measured at fair value in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 26, 2011:
 
(Thousands of Dollars)
 
Level 3


Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
Herald Value - liability (see Note 10)
 
2,300


2,300


The following methods and assumptions are used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate value. The carrying amounts of cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. Investments totaling $8,155,000, including our 17% ownership of the nonvoting common stock of TCT, are carried at cost. The fair value of floating rate debt cannot be determined as an active market for such debt does not exist. Our fixed rate debt consists of the $142,500,000 principal amount of Pulitzer Notes, as discussed more fully in Note 4, which is not traded on an active market and is held by a small group of Noteholders. Coupled with the volatility of substantially all domestic credit markets that exists, we are unable, as of June 26, 2011, to determine the fair value of such debt. The value, if determined, may be less than the carrying amount.


Subject to the final determination of impairment charges, there were no realized or unrealized gains or losses, purchases, sales, or transfers related to the Herald Value in the 39 weeks ended June 26, 2011. See Note 3. The determination of the amount of the Herald Value is based on an estimate of fair value using both market and income-based approaches.


In 2010, we reduced the carrying value of equipment no longer in use by $3,290,000, based on estimates of the related fair value in the current market. Based on age, condition and marketability we estimated the equipment had no value.