XML 72 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v2.4.0.6

Postretirement Obligations (Other Postretirement Benefit Plans, Defined Benefit [Member]) | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Sep. 30, 2012
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans, Defined Benefit [Member] |
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items] |
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Disclosure [Text Block] | POSTRETIREMENT AND POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS We provide retiree medical and life insurance benefits under postretirement plans at several of our operating locations. The level and adjustment of participant contributions vary depending on the specific plan. In addition, PD LLC provides postemployment disability benefits to certain employee groups prior to retirement. Our liability and related expense for benefits under the postretirement plans are recorded over the service period of active employees based upon annual actuarial calculations. We accrue postemployment disability benefits when it becomes probable that such benefits will be paid and when sufficient information exists to make reasonable estimates of the amounts to be paid. In 2011 the trust was amended to allow benefits for certain active employees to be paid from plan assets. The net periodic postretirement benefit cost components for our postretirement plans are as follows:
(Thousands of Dollars) | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Service cost for benefits earned during the year | 728 |  |  | 927 |  |  | 361 |
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation | 1,109 |  |  | 1,600 |  |  | 2,971 |
Expected return on plan assets | (2,129 | ) |  | (2,248 | ) |  | (2,274 | )
Amortization of net actuarial gain | (2,451 | ) |  | (2,467 | ) |  | (2,447 | )
Amortization of prior service benefit | (1,459 | ) |  | (1,455 | ) |  | (1,994 | )
Curtailment gains | — |  |  | (16,137 | ) |  | (43,008 | )
Net periodic postretirement benefit | (4,202 | ) |  | (19,780 | ) |  | (46,391 | )
Changes in benefit obligations and plan assets are as follows:
(Thousands of Dollars) | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Benefit obligation, beginning of year | 26,472 |  |  | 50,482 |
Service cost | 728 |  |  | 927 |
Interest cost | 1,109 |  |  | 1,600 |
Actuarial (gain) loss | 5,269 |  |  | (2,311 | )
Benefits paid, net of premiums received | (2,965 | ) |  | (2,922 | )
Changes in plan provisions | — |  |  | (5,931 | )
Curtailment gains | — |  |  | (15,535 | )
Medicare Part D subsidies | 115 |  |  | 162 |
Benefit obligation, end of year | 30,728 |  |  | 26,472 |
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year | 38,529 |  |  | 41,447 |
Actual return on plan assets | 2,127 |  |  | 19 |
Employer contributions (reimbursements) | (690 | ) |  | 1,347 |
Benefits paid, net of premiums and Medicare Part D subsidies received | (2,851 | ) |  | (2,760 | )
Benefits paid for active employees | (2,852 | ) |  | (1,524 | )
Fair value of plan assets at measurement date | 34,263 |  |  | 38,529 |
Funded status - benefit obligation less than plan assets | (3,535 | ) |  | (12,057 | )
The accumulated benefit obligation for plans with benefit obligations in excess of plan assets was $4,016,000 at September 30, 2012. There are no plan assets related to this plan. Disaggregated amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows:
(Thousands of Dollars) | September 30 2012 |  |  | September 25 2011 |
Noncurrent assets | 7,551 |  |  | 14,934 |
Postretirement benefit obligations | 4,016 |  |  | 2,877 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (before income tax benefit) | 30,344 |  |  | 42,379 |
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows:
(Thousands of Dollars) | September 30 2012 |  |  | September 25 2011 |
Unrecognized net actuarial gain | 16,570 |  |  | 27,145 |
Unrecognized prior service benefit | 13,774 |  |  | 15,234 |
| 30,344 |  |  | 42,379 |
We expect to recognize $1,324,000 and $1,459,000 of unrecognized net actuarial gain and unrecognized prior service benefit, respectively, in net periodic postretirement benefit cost in 2013. Assumptions Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations are as follows:
(Percent) | September 30 2012 |  | September 25 2011
Discount rate | 3.85 |  | 4.4
Expected long-term return on plan assets | 4.5 |  | 5.75
The assumptions related to the expected long-term return on plan assets are developed through an analysis of historical market returns and current market conditions. Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost are as follows:
(Percent) | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Discount rate | 4.4 |  |  | 4.8 |  |  | 5.5 |
Expected long-term return on plan assets | 5.75 |  |  | 5.75 |  |  | 5.75 |
Assumed health care cost trend rates are as follows:
(Percent) | September 30 2012 |  | September 25 2011
Health care cost trend rates | 9.0 |  | 9.0
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the “Ultimate Trend Rate”) | 5.0 |  | 5.0
Year in which the rate reaches the Ultimate Trend Rate | 2020 |  | 2019
Administrative costs related to indemnity plans are assumed to increase at the health care cost trend rates noted above. Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the postretirement plans. A one percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following annualized effects on reported amounts for 2012:
| One Percentage Point |
(Thousands of Dollars) | Increase |  |  | Decrease |
Effect on net periodic postretirement benefit | 53 |  |  | (48 | )
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation | 1,452 |  |  | (1,306 | )
Plan Assets The primary objective of our investment strategy is to satisfy our postretirement obligations at a reasonable cost. Assets are actively invested to balance real growth of capital through appreciation and reinvestment of dividend and interest income and safety of invested funds. An investment policy outlines the governance structure for decision making, sets investment objectives and restrictions, and establishes criteria for selecting and evaluating investment managers. The use of derivatives is strictly prohibited, except on a case-by-case basis where the manager has a proven capability, and only to hedge quantifiable risks such as exposure to foreign currencies. An investment committee, consisting of certain of our executives and supported by independent consultants, is responsible for monitoring compliance with the investment policy. Assets are periodically redistributed to maintain the appropriate policy allocation. The weighted-average asset allocation of our postretirement assets is as follows:
(Percent) |  | Actual Allocation
Asset Class | Current Policy Allocation |  | September 30 2012 | September 25 2011
Equity securities | 10-30 |  | 21 | 8
Debt securities | 70-90 |  | 75 | 85
Cash and cash equivalents | — |  | 2 | 7
Receivables, net | — |  | 2 | —
Plan assets include no Company securities. Assets include cash and cash equivalents and receivables from time to time due to the need to reallocate assets within policy guidelines. Fair Value Measurements The fair value hierarchy of postretirement assets at September 30, 2012 is as follows:
(Thousands of Dollars) | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 692 |  | — |  | — |
Receivables, net | 803 |  | — |  | — |
Domestic equity securities | 4,385 |  | 2,069 |  | — |
International equity securities | — |  | 671 |  | — |
Debt securities | — |  | 25,643 |  | — |
There were no purchases, sales or transfers of assets classified as Level 3 in 2012, 2011 or 2010. Cash Flows Based on our forecast at September 30, 2012, we do not expect to contribute to our postretirement plans in 2013. In December 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Modernization Act”) was signed into law. The Modernization Act introduced a prescription drug benefit under Medicare (“Medicare Part D”) and a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans (“Subsidy”) that provide a benefit at least actuarially equivalent (as that term is defined in the Act) to Medicare Part D. We concluded we qualify for the Subsidy under the Modernization Act since the prescription drug benefits provided under our postretirement health care plans generally require lower premiums from covered retirees and have lower deductibles than the benefits provided in Medicare Part D and, accordingly, are actuarially equivalent to or better than, the benefits provided under the Modernization Act. We anticipate future benefit payments to be paid either with future contributions to the plan or directly from plan assets, as follows:
(Thousands of Dollars) | Gross Payments |  |  | Less Medicare Part D Subsidy |  |  | Net Payments |
2013 | 3,280 |  |  | (220 | ) |  | 3,060 |
2014 | 3,080 |  |  | (230 | ) |  | 2,850 |
2015 | 2,980 |  |  | (230 | ) |  | 2,750 |
2016 | 2,960 |  |  | (230 | ) |  | 2,730 |
2017 | 2,900 |  |  | (230 | ) |  | 2,670 |
2018-2022 | 13,280 |  |  | (1,100 | ) |  | 12,180 |
2011 Changes to Plans In May 2011, a new bargaining unit contract eliminated postretirement medical coverage for affected active employees and froze defined pension benefits. The elimination of postretirement medical coverage resulted in a non-cash curtailment gain of $3,974,000 which was recognized in the 13 weeks ended June 26, 2011, reduced 2011 net periodic postretirement medical expense by $82,000 beginning in the 13 weeks ended June 26, 2011 and reduced the benefit obligation liability at June 26, 2011 by $3,371,000. The freeze of defined pension benefits reduced 2011 net periodic pension expenses by $188,000 beginning in the 13 weeks ended June 26, 2011 and reduced the benefit obligation liability at June 26, 2011 by $592,000. In March 2011, we notified certain participants in our postretirement medical plans of changes to be made to the plans, including increases in participant premium cost-sharing and elimination of coverage for certain participants. The changes resulted in a non-cash curtailment gain of $1,991,000 which was recognized in the 13 weeks ended March 27, 2011 and reduced the benefit obligation liability at March 27, 2011 by $3,030,000. In November 2010, we notified certain participants in our postretirement medical plans of changes to be made to the plans, including increases in participant premium cost-sharing and elimination of coverage for certain participants. The changes resulted in a non-cash curtailment gain of $10,172,000 which was recognized in the 13 weeks ended December 26, 2010, reduced 2011 net periodic postretirement medical cost b y $769,000 beginning in the 13 weeks ended December 26, 2010, and reduced the benefit obligation liability at December 26, 2010 by $15,065,000. 2010 Changes to Plans In March 2010, members of the United Media Guild voted to approve a new 5.5 year contract, effective in April 2010. The new contract eliminated postretirement medical coverage for active employees and defined pension benefits were frozen. The elimination of postretirement medical coverage resulted in non-cash curtailment gains of $11,878,000, which were recognized in the 13 weeks ended March 28, 2010 and reduced the benefit obligation liability at March 28, 2010 by $6,576,000. The freeze of defined pension benefits resulted in non-cash curtailment gains of $2,004,000, which were recognized in the 13 weeks ended March 28, 2010, reduced 2010 net periodic pension expenses by $668,000 beginning in the 13 weeks ended June 27, 2010, and reduced the benefit obligation liability at March 28, 2010 by $2,004,000. In December 2009, we notified certain participants in our postretirement medical plans of changes to be made to the plans, including increases in participant premium cost-sharing and elimination of coverage for certain participants. The changes resulted in non-cash curtailment gains of $31,130,000, which were recognized in the 13 weeks ended December 27, 2009, reduced 2010 net periodic postretirement medical cost by $1,460,000 beginning in the 13 weeks ended March 28, 2010, and reduced the benefit obligation liability at December 27, 2009 by $28,750,000. Litigation Several of the plan changes noted above were the subject of litigation, or arbitration claims, under the terms of the respective collective bargaining agreements. In 2012, we settled all such claims with payments to plan participants totaling $2,802,000. These payments are classified as other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Postemployment Plan Our postemployment benefit obligation, representing certain disability benefits, is $3,143,000 at September 30, 2012 and $3,227,000 at September 25, 2011.

X
- Details
Name: | us-gaap_DefinedBenefitPlanDisclosureLineItems
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for pension and other postretirement benefits. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 158 -Paragraph 7, 21, 22 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name FASB Staff Position (FSP) -Number FAS106-2 -Paragraph 20, 21, 22 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Implementation Guide (Q and A) -Number FAS88 -Paragraph 63 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 106 -Paragraph 518 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 715 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2235017 Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 5, 6, 7, 8 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 5 -Subparagraph b -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 8 -Subparagraph m -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 87 -Paragraph 264 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher AICPA -Name Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) -Number 30 -Paragraph 26 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) -Number 03-2 -Paragraph 8 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 5 -Subparagraph h -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 5 -Subparagraph a -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 132R -Paragraph 5 -Subparagraph q -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_PensionAndOtherPostretirementBenefitsDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration