XML 28 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.21.2

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies | 9 Months Ended
--- | ---
Sep. 30, 2021
Notes to Financial Statements |
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block] |
9. | Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Matters The Company is a party to various legal actions and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of Company's management, resolution of these matters is not anticipated to have a material adverse effect on the Company or its estimated or desired affiliates, assets, business, clients, capital, cash flow, credit, expenses, financial condition, income, legal costs, liabilities, liquidity, locations, marketing, operations, prospects, sales, strategies, taxation or other achievement, results or condition. Affinity Insurance and Related Reimbursement Dispute SPAR Marketing Force, Inc. ("SMF"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of SGRP that provides merchandising and marketing service to its clients throughout the United States through (among other things) services provided by others, is owed $675,000 for security deposit advances and $226,000 for quarterly premium advances made by SMF to SPAR Administrative Services, Inc. ("SAS") (as described below). Affinity Insurance Company, Ltd. ("Affinity") is a captive insurance company that provides insurance and reinsurance products to its shareholders and their affiliates in exchange for payment of premium installments, posting of security collateral and other requirements, and subject to adjustments and assessments. SAS is a shareholder and member of Affinity and has been since approximately 2000. SMF became a direct shareholder and member of Affinity in March 2018 to directly procure insurance for the domestic employees of the Company. The business services SAS provided to, or on behalf of, SMF included insurance coverages for SMF and other SGRP employees domestically for SAS' field administrators and other employees and for the field specialists provided by SBS to SMF through the termination by SMF of SBS’ services effective on or about July 31, 2018, all in connection with services provided by SMF to its clients. In connection with the business services provided by SAS, and based on arrangements between the parties, the Affinity insurance premiums for such coverage were ultimately charged (through SAS) for their fair share of the costs of that insurance to SMF, SAS (which then charges the Company) and SBS. At the time SMF terminated SAS's services, the security deposit that SAS provided to Affinity to procure insurance coverage on behalf of SMF was approximately $965,000. SMF financed approximately $675,000 of that security deposit. During the year ended December 31, 2020, SAS received $426,795 of the security deposit refund in cash and applied almost all the remaining balance toward various fees as payments. SMF has demanded repayment of its advances to SAS from refunds received from Affinity, but SAS has refused. SAS has recently stated it has no funds available to remit to SMF. SAS has acknowledged owing these advances to SMF. In a related matter, SMF also advanced monies to SAS to fund the payments that SAS was obligated to pay to Affinity for quarterly premium installments. SMF advanced and SAS accrued a liability of approximately $226,000 for monies advanced by SMF to SAS for such quarterly premium installments. Affinity is obligated to refund any excess premiums and in fact in May of 2020, Affinity refunded $94,414 of those premium payments to SAS. On July 8, 2020, the Company issued a demand notice to SAS for the return of $901,000 (the $675,000 security advances and the $226,000 premium advances) but to-date SAS has not complied with this demand. The Company has subsequently prepared the draft of a complaint to be filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in Westchester County, New York, seeking appropriate relief and recovery from SAS and other related parties. Filing of the complaint is still pending. The Company recorded a reserve for the full $901,000 in such receivables in 2018 but has not and will not release SAS' obligations to repay those amounts. SAS is claiming alleged ongoing post-termination expenses, but SMF believes that no post-termination expenses are required to be paid to SAS for its expenses following the termination of SAS' services two years ago in July 2018. See SBS Bankruptcy, Settlement and March 2020 Claim in Note 9 -- Legal Matters, below. Advancement Claims On December 3, 2018, Robert G. Brown demanded advancement from SGRP for his proportionate share of the legal fees and expenses incurred by him in connection with related party litigation matters that have been settled (the "Brown Advancement Demand"). Counsel advised that Brown had been sued as a stockholder and conspirator in such action against him, and not as a director, that Brown was not a director at the time, and did not believe Brown could reasonably succeed in a lawsuit for advancement. SGRP, with the support of its Audit Committee, rejected the Brown Advancement Demand. On January 27, 2019, Mr. Robert G. Brown sent a draft of his proposed Delaware litigation complaint threatening to sue SGRP respecting the Brown Advancement Demand, which he repeated on February 2, 2019. Mr. Brown on several occasions sent copies of that complaint to SGRP in 2020; and filed his complaint on his own behalf in the Delaware Court of Chancery on September 17, 2020; however, through September 30, 2021, no such complaint has been properly served by Mr. Brown. SGRP continues to deny the Brown Advancement Demand. SBS Bankruptcy, Settlement and March 2020 Claim In 2019, the Company filed claims against Robert G, Brown's company, SBS, in its federal bankruptcy proceeding in Nevada seeking reimbursement for $378,838 for SMF's funding of certain security deposits and $12,963 for SMF's funding of field payment checks, and $1,839,459 for indemnification of SGRP for its settlement of the class action case filed in 2014 against SBS and the Company in Alameda County, California ("Clothier") and legal costs and an unspecified amount for indemnification of SGRP related to the class action case filed in January 2017 against SBS and SGRP in the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts ("Hogan") (which SGRP settled in November 2019) and other to be discovered indemnified claims. The Company settled its claims for (among other things) indemnification from SBS in the Clothier case as well as the class action case filed on February 21, 2014 against SBS, Robert G. Brown and William H. Bartels in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas ("Rodgers") with SBS pursuant to the Compromise and Settlement Agreement, dated July 26, 2019 (the "Settlement Agreement"). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Company settled such claims for $174,097, payable by SBS over 24 monthly installments starting January 1, 2020, and without any interest (collectively, the "Discounted Claim Payments"), and SBS completely released the Company from all obligations that may be owed to SBS, except for the Discounted Claim Payments and the proven Unpaid A/R (as defined in the Settlement Agreement), if any, payable by the Company upon its determination. The Company has paid the proven Unpaid A/R and has no further obligation. The Company recorded the total settlement amount of $174,097 as of December 31, 2019. To date, SBS is in default of all outstanding payments and formal default notices have been sent to SBS. As of this date the Company believes these SBS payments must ultimately be paid by SBS and will continue to evaluate its collectability from SBS and establish reserves as appropriate. As of September 30, 2021, the total settlement amount has been reserved. On March 6, 2020, Robert G. Brown, President, Director and indirect owner of SBS, sent an email communication on behalf of SBS demanding payment of $1,707,374 to SBS from the Company pursuant to the Settlement Agreement (the " March 2020 Claim"). The Company has reviewed the March 2020 Claim and disagrees that any such amount is owed. The Company has not accrued anything respecting Mr. Robert G. Brown's claims. On March 17, 2020, William H. Bartels, Director and significant shareholder of SGRP, made a further demand of claims and expenses owed to Mr. Brown and Mr. Bartels by the Company in connection with, among other matters, the Clothier, Rodgers and Hogan cases. Such additional claims, net of an anticipated reduction, totaled approximately $1.3 million, bringing their total claims to approximately $3 million. The Company has rejected these claims, and believes it was released from all such claims by SBS under the Settlement Agreement. Since February 2021, Mr. Robert G. Brown and Mr. William H. Bartels provided management with a revised list of expenses that increased the implied value of the claims and owed expenses to $5.6 million. Mr. Brown and Mr. Bartels acknowledged that they have not made a formal demand for such increased amounts. The Company continues to reject these claims of any amount and maintains the same position. NMS Bankruptcy On August 10, 2019, NMS, to protect continuity of its field specialist nationwide, petitioned for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. District for Nevada (the "NMS Chapter 11 Case"). On March 22, 2021, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada closed the NMS Chapter 11 Case.

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2127136 Reference 2: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2144648 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 954 -SubTopic 440 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (a) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6491277&loc=d3e6429-115629 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -Subparagraph (c) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=123406679&loc=d3e25336-109308 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -Subparagraph (a) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=123406679&loc=d3e25336-109308 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_DisclosureTextBlockAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration