20-F 1 d397639d20f.htm FORM 20-F

##### Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

☐ | REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended March 25, 2017

OR

☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

☐ | SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 001-32635

BIRKS GROUP INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Not Applicable

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

Canada

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

2020 Robert Bourassa

Montreal Québec

Canada

H3A 2A5

(Address of principal executive offices)

Pat Di Lillo, 514-397-2592 (telephone), 514-397-2537 (facsimile)

2020 Robert Bourassa

Suite 200

Montreal Québec

Canada

H3A 2A5

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class |  | Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A Voting Shares, without nominal or par value |  | NYSE MKT LLC

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None.

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

None.

The number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the Annual Report was:

|  | 10,242,911 |  |  |  | Class A Voting Shares, without nominal or par value
|  | 7,717,970 |  |  |  | Class B Multiple Voting Shares, without nominal or par value
|  | 0 |  |  |  | Series A Preferred Shares, without nominal or par value, issuable in series

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ☐ Yes ☒ No

Note: Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☒

Emerging Growth Company ☐

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP ☒ |  | International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ☐ |  | Other ☐

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow: Item 17 ☐ Item 18 ☐

If this is an Annual Report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No

##### Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

|  |  |  |  |  | Page |
Part I |  |  |  |
|  | Item 1. |  | Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers |  |  | 2 |
|  | Item 2. |  | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable |  |  | 2 |
|  | Item 3. |  | Key Information |  |  | 2 |
|  | Item 4. |  | Information on the Company |  |  | 11 |
|  | Item 4A. |  | Unresolved Staff Comments |  |  | 18 |
|  | Item 5. |  | Operating and Financial Review and Prospects |  |  | 18 |
|  | Item 6. |  | Directors, Senior Management and Employees |  |  | 37 |
|  | Item 7. |  | Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions |  |  | 47 |
|  | Item 8. |  | Financial Information |  |  | 49 |
|  | Item 9. |  | The Offer and Listing |  |  | 50 |
|  | Item 10. |  | Additional Information |  |  | 51 |
|  | Item 11. |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |  |  | 56 |
|  | Item 12. |  | Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities |  |  | 57 |
Part II |  |  |  |
|  | Item 13. |  | Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies |  |  | 57 |
|  | Item 14. |  | Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds |  |  | 57 |
|  | Item 15. |  | Controls and Procedures |  |  | 57 |
|  | Item 16A. |  | Audit Committee Financial Expert |  |  | 58 |
|  | Item 16B. |  | Code of Ethics |  |  | 58 |
|  | Item 16C. |  | Principal Accountant Fees and Services |  |  | 58 |
|  | Item 16D. |  | Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees |  |  | 59 |
|  | Item 16E. |  | Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers |  |  | 59 |
|  | Item 16F. |  | Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant |  |  | 59 |
|  | Item 16G. |  | Corporate Governance |  |  | 59 |
|  | Item 16H. |  | Mine Safety Disclosure |  |  | 59 |
|  | Item 17. |  | Financial Statements |  |  | 59 |
|  | Item 18. |  | Financial Statements |  |  | 59 |
Part III |  |  |  |
|  | Item 19. |  | Exhibits |  |  | 60 |

i

##### Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

References

Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Birks Group,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” are used in this Annual Report to refer to Birks Group Inc., a Canadian corporation, and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. In addition, the term “Mayors” refers to Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Mayor’s Jewelers of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation, and “the merger” refers to the merger of Mayors with a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, as approved by the stockholders on November 14, 2005. The term “Birks” refers to Henry Birks & Sons Inc., the legal name of Birks Group prior to the merger.

Presentation of Financial and Other Information

The consolidated financial statements of Birks Group contained in this Annual Report are reported in United States (“U.S.”) dollars and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. Unless otherwise indicated, all monetary references herein are denominated in U.S. dollars; references to “dollars” or “$” are to U.S. dollars and references to “CAD$” or “Canadian dollars” are to Canadian dollars.

Throughout this Annual Report, we refer to our fiscal year ending March 25, 2017, as fiscal 2017, and our fiscal years ended March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015, as fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, respectively. Our fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in March of each year. The fiscal years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015 consisted of 52 weeks with four thirteen-week periods.

Forward-Looking Information

This Annual Report and other written reports and releases and oral statements made from time to time by the Company contain forward-looking statements which can be identified by their use of words like “plans,” “expects,” “believes,” “will,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “projects,” “estimates,” “could,” “would,” “may,” “planned,” “goal,” and other words of similar meaning. All statements that address expectations, possibilities or projections about the future, including, without limitation, statements about our strategies for growth, expansion plans, sources or adequacy of capital, expenditures and financial results are forward-looking statements.

One must carefully consider such statements and understand that many factors could cause actual results to differ from the forward-looking statements, such as inaccurate assumptions and other risks and uncertainties, some known and some unknown. No forward-looking statement is guaranteed and actual results may vary materially. Such statements are made as of the date provided, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect future developments or circumstances.

One should carefully evaluate such statements by referring to the factors described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), especially on this Form 20-F and our Forms 6-K. Particular review is to be made of Items 3, 4 and 5 of this Form 20-F where we discuss in more detail various important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from expected or historical results. All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Since it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors, the identified items are not a complete statement of all risks or uncertainties.

1

##### Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. | Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

Not applicable.

Item 2. | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

Not applicable.

Item 3. | Key Information

Selected Financial Data

The following financial data as of March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016 and for the years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following financial data as of March 28, 2015, March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013 and for the years ended March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this Annual Report. All fiscal years in the table below consisted of 52 weeks. The historical results included below and elsewhere in this Annual Report are not necessarily indicative of our future performance.

The data presented below is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included elsewhere in this Annual Report. You should also read the following summary data in conjunction with Item 5, “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Income Statement Data: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 25, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |  |  | March 29, 2014 |  |  | March 30, 2013 |
|  | (In thousands, except per share data) |
Net sales |  | $ | 286,921 |  |  | $ | 285,826 |  |  | $ | 301,637 |  |  | $ | 281,165 |  |  | $ | 292,759 |
Cost of sales |  |  | 178,487 |  |  |  | 176,439 |  |  |  | 183,832 |  |  |  | 166,498 |  |  |  | 166,585 |
Gross profit |  |  | 108,434 |  |  |  | 109,387 |  |  |  | 117,805 |  |  |  | 114,667 |  |  |  | 126,174 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |  |  | 94,226 |  |  |  | 91,125 |  |  |  | 103,735 |  |  |  | 105,512 |  |  |  | 110,806 |
Restructuring charges (1) |  |  | 842 |  |  |  | 754 |  |  |  | 2,604 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 5,034 |  |  |  | 5,229 |  |  |  | 5,932 |  |  |  | 5,426 |  |  |  | 4,563 |
Gain on sale of assets (2) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (3,229 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Impairment of long-lived assets (3) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 238 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Total operating expenses |  |  | 100,102 |  |  |  | 93,879 |  |  |  | 112,509 |  |  |  | 110,938 |  |  |  | 115,369 |
Operating income |  |  | 8,332 |  |  |  | 15,508 |  |  |  | 5,296 |  |  |  | 3,729 |  |  |  | 10,805 |
Interest and other financial costs |  |  | 8,681 |  |  |  | 10,020 |  |  |  | 11,285 |  |  |  | 9,512 |  |  |  | 9,272 |
Debt extinguishment charges (4) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,643 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Income (loss) before income taxes |  |  | (349 | ) |  |  | 5,488 |  |  |  | (8,632 | ) |  |  | (5,783 | ) |  |  | 1,533 |
Income tax (recovery) expense |  |  | (5,277 | ) |  |  | 50 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 20 |
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |  | $ | 4,928 |  |  | $ | 5,438 |  |  | $ | (8,632 | ) |  | $ | (5,801 | ) |  | $ | 1,513 |
Net income (loss) per common share |  | $ | 0.27 |  |  | $ | 0.30 |  |  | $ | (0.48 | ) |  | $ | (0.35 | ) |  | $ | 0.11 |
Net income (loss) per common share – diluted |  | $ | 0.27 |  |  | $ | 0.30 |  |  | $ | (0.48 | ) |  | $ | (0.35 | ) |  | $ | 0.11 |
Weighted average common shares outstanding |  |  | 17,961 |  |  |  | 17,961 |  |  |  | 17,937 |  |  |  | 16,617 |  |  |  | 13,538 |
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted |  |  | 18,418 |  |  |  | 17,961 |  |  |  | 17,937 |  |  |  | 16,617 |  |  |  | 13,544 |
Dividends per share |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |

2

##### Table of Contents

Balance Sheet Data: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | As of March 25, 2017 |  |  | As of March 26, 2016 |  |  | As of March 28, 2015 |  |  | As of March 29, 2014 |  |  | As of March 30, 2013 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Working capital |  | $ | 21,478 |  |  | $ | 28,434 |  |  | $ | 26,112 |  |  | $ | 33,304 |  |  | $ | 27,563 |
Total assets |  | $ | 178,938 |  |  | $ | 182,973 |  |  | $ | 180,204 |  |  | $ | 190,494 |  |  | $ | 179,952 |
Bank indebtedness |  | $ | 70,434 |  |  | $ | 62,431 |  |  | $ | 64,347 |  |  | $ | 73,941 |  |  | $ | 67,307 |
Long-term debt (including current portion) |  | $ | 33,335 |  |  | $ | 52,285 |  |  | $ | 56,784 |  |  | $ | 54,750 |  |  | $ | 41,895 |
Stockholders’ equity |  | $ | 12,796 |  |  | $ | 7,704 |  |  | $ | 2,823 |  |  | $ | 13,622 |  |  | $ | 16,351 |
Common Stock: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Value |  | $ | 69,601 |  |  | $ | 69,601 |  |  | $ | 69,601 |  |  | $ | 69,475 |  |  | $ | 64,489 |
Shares |  |  | 17,961 |  |  |  | 17,961 |  |  |  | 17,961 |  |  |  | 17,850 |  |  |  | 14,834 |

(1) | Restructuring charges related to consolidating most of our corporate administrative workforce to Montreal as well as outsourcing a portion of our jewelry manufacturing and other corporate staff reductions. Refer to note 12 to our consolidated financial statements.

(2) | On August 4, 2015, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement for the sale of the assets of the corporate sales division to Rideau Recognition Solutions Inc. (“Rideau”) for $4.3 million (refer to note 6 to our consolidated financial statements) and executed a supply and licensing agreement for Birks products and Birks-branded products.

(3) | Impairment of long-lived assets for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2015, represents $0.2 million non-cash impairment associated with a Canadian Birks retail shop-in-shop location and software impairment due to the decision to abandon a software project.

(4) | Debt extinguishment charges arising from amendments to the senior secured term loan and senior secured revolving credit facility in 2015.

(5) | The Company has reclassified certain Balance Sheet amounts for certain periods presented above in compliance with new U.S GAAP guidance under standard ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (refer to note 2(s) of the Company’s consolidated financial statements).

Dividends and Dividend Policy

We have not paid dividends since 1998 and do not currently intend to pay dividends on our Class A voting shares or Class B multiple voting shares in the foreseeable future. Our ability to pay dividends on our Class A voting shares and Class B multiple voting shares are restricted by our credit agreements. See Item 5, “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Liquidity and Capital Resources.” If dividends were declared by our Board of Directors, shareholders would receive a dividend equal to the per share dividend we would pay to holders of our Class A voting shares or holders of Class B multiple voting shares. Dividends we would pay to U.S. holders would generally be subject to withholding tax. See Item 10, “Additional Information—Taxation.”

RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to the Company

Additional financing or capital that may be required may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or may not be available at all. Capital raised through the sale or issuance of equity securities may result in dilution to our current shareholders. Failure to obtain such additional financing or capital could have an adverse impact on our liquidity and financial condition including our ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company is identifying potential sources of financing that includes raising additional funds through public or private equity or debt financing, including funding from governmental sources, which may not be possible as the success of raising additional funds is beyond our control. The sale of additional equity securities could result in significant dilution to our current shareholders, and the securities issued in future financings may have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to those of our common stock. The incurrence of additional indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could result in operating and financing covenants that may restrict our operations. The term of our senior secured revolving credit facility expires on the earlier of (a) December 21, 2021 or (b) the date that is 91 days prior to the maturity date then in effect with respect to our senior secured term loan debt, while our senior secured term loan matures on May 21, 2021, as such, financing may be unavailable in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, or at all, which could have a material adverse impact on our business.

Our business could be adversely affected if we are unable to continue to lease retail stores in prime locations and successfully negotiate favorable lease terms.

Historically, we have generally been successful in negotiating leases for lease renewals as our current leases near expiration. However, if we are unsuccessful at negotiating favorable renewal terms, locations or if more capital is

3

##### Table of Contents

required to meet landlord requirements for remodeling or relocating retail stores and we are unable to secure the necessary funds to complete these projects, our business, financial condition, and operating results could be adversely affected. In addition, we may not be able to locate suitable alternative sites in a timely manner. Our sales, earnings and cash flows will decline if we fail to maintain existing store locations, renew leases or relocate to alternative sites, in each case on attractive terms.

As of May 31, 2017, we had 46 leased retail stores, which include the lease of our Montreal flagship store. The leases are generally in prime retail locations and generally have lease terms of ten years, with rent being a fixed minimum base plus, for a majority of the stores, a percentage of the store’s sales volume (subject to some adjustments) over a specified threshold. Some of our Canadian leases and U.S. leases are up for renewal within the next two years and many uncontrollable factors can impact our ability to renew these leases, including but not limited to competition for key locations from other retailers. Approximately 15% of the Company’s store leases are renewable within two years. The capital expenditures related to retail store locations in both Canada and the U.S. are estimated to be approximately $13.9 million over the next two years to remodel, relocate or open new stores. Of the $13.9 million, we estimate that $8.1 million will be spent in fiscal 2018 leaving the balance to fiscal 2019. Although we are able to finance these capital expenditures with internally generated funds and existing financing arrangements, we continue our efforts towards obtaining additional external financing as well as considering potential asset restructurings to cover the capital expenditures needed in fiscal 2018 and 2019.

The level of our indebtedness could adversely affect our operations, liquidity and financial condition.

The level of our indebtedness and the debt service obligations is high in proportion to our assets and stockholders’ equity. Our debt levels fluctuate from time to time based on seasonal working capital needs. The following table sets forth our total indebtedness (including bank indebtedness and current and long-term portion of debt), total stockholders’ equity, total capitalization and ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization as of:

|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |
Total indebtedness |  | $ | 103,769,000 |  |  | $ | 114,716,000 |
Total stockholders’ equity |  |  | 12,796,000 |  |  |  | 7,704,000 |
Total capitalization |  | $ | 116,565,000 |  |  | $ | 122,420,000 |
Ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization |  |  | 89.0 | % |  |  | 93.7 | %

This level of leverage could adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition. Although we believe that our financial situation has improved compared to the prior fiscal year, some examples of how high level of indebtedness could affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition may include the following:

| • |  | make it difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness;

| • |  | increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions;

| • |  | increase our vulnerability to fluctuations in interest rates;

| • |  | require us to dedicate a substantial portion of cash from operations to the payment of debt service, thereby reducing the availability of cash to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;

| • |  | limit our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, general corporate purposes or acquisitions;

| • |  | place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have a lower degree of leverage; and

| • |  | negatively affect the price of our stock.

Significant restrictions on our borrowing capacity could result in our inability to fund our cash flow requirements or maintain minimum excess availability requirements under the terms of our secured asset-based credit facilities needed to support our day-to-day operations.

Our ability to fund our operations and meet our cash flow requirements in order to fund our operations is dependent upon our ability to maintain positive excess availability under our senior credit facilities. Our senior secured revolving credit facility administrative agent may impose, at any time, discretionary reserves, which would lower the level of borrowing availability under our senior secured revolving credit facility (customary for asset-based

4

##### Table of Contents

loans), at their reasonable discretion, to: i) ensure that we maintain adequate liquidity for the operation of our business, ii) cover any deterioration in the amount or value of the collateral, and iii) reflect impediments to the lenders to realize upon the collateral. There is no limit to the amount of discretionary reserves that our senior secured revolving credit facility administrative agent may impose at its reasonable discretion.

In December 2016, we executed an amendment to the terms of our $110.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility to extend the maturity from August 22, 2017 to the earlier to occur of (a) December 21, 2021 or (b) the date that is 91 days prior to the maturity date then in effect with respect to our senior secured term loan debt. We also executed an amendment to the terms of our senior secured term loan to extend the maturity from August 22, 2018 to May 21, 2021 and to reduce the senior secured term loan amount from $33.0 million to $28.0 million, with the $5.0 million reduction in the senior secured term loan borrowed under the senior secured revolving credit facility. In addition, as part of the amendments to the senior secured revolving credit facility and the senior secured term loan, the minimum excess availability levels that we were required to maintain have been reduced from $8.0 million to $6.0 million. The amendments to the senior secured revolving credit facility and the senior secured term loan also include a reduction to the minimum adjusted EBITDA levels and reduce the seasonal availability blocks imposed from December 20th to January 20th of each year from $12.5 million to $11.5 million and from January 21st to February 10th from $5.0 million to $4.0 million. Failure to meet the minimum adjusted EBITDA covenant in the event that excess availability falls below $6.0 million for any five consecutive business days is still considered an event of default under the amended agreements, that could result in the outstanding balances borrowed under our senior secured term loan and senior secured revolving credit facility becoming due immediately, which would result in cross defaults on our other borrowings.

Our business depends, in part, on factors affecting consumer spending that are out of our control.

Our business depends on consumer demand for our products and, consequently, is sensitive to a number of factors that are beyond our control that influence consumer spending, including general economic conditions, consumer confidence in future economic conditions and political conditions, tourism, recession and fears of recession, consumer debt, disposable consumer income, conditions in the housing market, consumer perceptions of personal well-being and security, fuel prices, inclement weather, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, sales tax rate increases, inflation, and war and fears of war. In particular, we have seen that the economic downturn and the uncertain economic environment in the past years has contributed to declining revenues and losses for our business. Jewelry purchases are discretionary for consumers and may be particularly and disproportionately affected by adverse trends in the general economy and the equity markets. Adverse changes in factors affecting discretionary consumer spending could reduce consumer demand for our products, resulting in a reduction in our sales and harming our business and operating results. A substantial portion of our customers use credit, either from our private label and proprietary credit cards or another consumer credit source, to purchase jewelry. When there is a downturn in the general economy, fewer people may use or be approved for credit, which could result in a reduction in net sales and/or an increase in bad debts, which in turn, could lead to an unfavorable impact on our overall profitability. Consequently, our belief that we currently have sufficient liquidity to fund our operations is based on certain assumptions about the future state of the economy, the future availability of borrowings to fund our operations and our future operating performance. To the extent that the economy and other conditions affecting our business are significantly worse than we anticipate, we may not achieve our projected level of financial performance and we may determine that we do not have sufficient capital to fund our operations.

5

##### Table of Contents

Our business could be adversely affected if our relationships with any primary vendors are terminated or if the delivery of their products is delayed or interrupted.

We compete with other jewelry retailers for access to vendors that will provide us with the quality and quantity of merchandise necessary to operate our business, and our merchandising strategy depends upon our ability to maintain good relations with significant vendors. Certain brand name watch manufacturers have distribution agreements with our Company that, among other things, provide for specific sales locations, yearly renewal terms and early termination provisions at the manufacturer’s discretion. In fiscal 2017, merchandise supplied by our largest luxury timepiece supplier and sold through our stores accounted for approximately 42% of our total net sales. Our relationships with primary suppliers are generally not pursuant to long-term agreements. We obtain materials and manufactured items from third-party suppliers. Any delay or interruption in our suppliers’ abilities to provide us with necessary materials and components may affect our manufacturing capabilities or may require us to seek alternative supply sources. Any delay or interruption in receiving supplies could impair our ability to supply products to our stores and, accordingly, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. The abrupt loss of any of our third-party suppliers, especially our largest luxury timepiece supplier, or a decline in the quality or quantity of materials supplied by any third-party suppliers could cause significant disruption in our business.

We may not successfully manage our inventory, which could have an adverse effect on our net sales, profitability, cash flow and liquidity.

As a retail business, our results of operations are dependent on our ability to manage our inventory. To properly manage our inventory, we must be able to accurately estimate customer demand and supply requirements and purchase new inventory accordingly. If we fail to sell the inventory we purchase or manufacture, we may be required to write-down our inventory or pay our vendors without new purchases, creating additional vendor financing, which would have an adverse impact on our earnings and cash flows. Additionally, a significant portion of the merchandise we sell is carried on a consignment basis prior to sale or is otherwise financed by vendors, which reduces our required capital investment in inventory. Any significant change in these consignment or vendor financing relationships could have a material adverse effect on our net sales, cash flows and liquidity.

Fluctuations in the availability and prices of our raw materials and finished goods may adversely affect our results of operations.

We offer a large selection of distinctive high quality merchandise, including diamond, gemstone and precious metal jewelry, rings, wedding bands, earrings, bracelets, necklaces, charms, timepieces and gifts. Accordingly, significant changes in the availability or prices of diamonds, gemstones, and precious metals we require for our products could adversely affect our earnings. We do not maintain long-term inventories or otherwise hedge a material portion of the price of raw materials. A significant increase in the price of these materials could adversely affect our net sales and gross margins.

Applicable laws and regulations related to consumer credit may adversely affect our business.

The operation of our credit business subjects us to substantial regulation relating to disclosure and other requirements upon origination, servicing, debt collection and particularly upon the amount of finance charges we can impose. Any adverse change in the regulation of consumer credit could adversely affect our earnings. For example, new laws or regulations could limit the amount of interest or fees we, or our banks, can charge on consumer loan accounts, or restrict our ability to collect on account balances, which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings. Compliance with existing and future laws or regulations could require material expenditures or otherwise adversely affect our business or financial results. Failure to comply with these laws or regulations, even if inadvertent, could result in negative publicity, and fines, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

6

##### Table of Contents

We are exposed to currency exchange risks that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

While we report financial results in U.S. dollars, a substantial portion of our sales are recorded in Canadian dollars. For our operations located in Canada, non-Canadian currency transactions and assets and liabilities subject us to foreign currency risk. Conversely, for the operations located in the U.S., non-U.S. currency transactions and assets and liabilities subject us to foreign currency risk. In addition, material fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, resulting in a weakening of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar, could significantly reduce our borrowing availability under our secured revolving credit facility, which is denominated in U.S. dollars, and limit our ability to finance our operations. For purposes of financial reporting, our financial statements are reported in U.S. dollars by translating, where necessary, net sales and expenses from Canadian dollars at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period, while assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates, with the effect of such translation recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. As a result, for purposes of financial reporting, foreign exchange gains or losses recorded in earnings relate to non-Canadian dollar transactions of the operations located in Canada and non-U.S. dollar transactions of the operations located in the U.S. We expect to continue to report our financial results in U.S. dollars. Consequently, our reported earnings could fluctuate materially as a result of foreign exchange translation gains or losses.

We operate in a highly competitive and fragmented industry.

The retail jewelry business is highly competitive and fragmented, and we compete with nationally recognized jewelry chains as well as a large number of independent regional and local jewelry retailers and other types of retailers who sell jewelry and gift items, such as department stores and mass merchandisers. We also compete with internet sellers of jewelry. Because of the breadth and depth of this competition, we are constantly under competitive pressure that both constrains pricing and requires extensive merchandising and marketing efforts in order for us to remain competitive.

We are controlled by a single shareholder whose interests may be different from yours.

As of May 31, 2017, Grande Rousse Trust (“Grande Rousse”) beneficially owns or controls 76.0% of all classes of our outstanding voting shares, which are directly owned by Montrovest B.V. (“Montrovest”) and Mangrove Holding S.A. (“Mangrove”). Montrovest and Mangrove own 49.3% and 26.7% of our outstanding voting shares respectively. The trustee of Grande Rousse Trust is Rohan Private Trust Company Limited (the “Trustee”). Under our restated articles, Montrovest and Mangrove, as holders of the Class B multiple voting shares, have the ability to control most actions requiring shareholder approval, including electing the members of our Board of Directors and the issuance of new equity.

Grande Rousse, Montrovest and Mangrove may have different interests than you have and may make decisions that do not correspond to your interests. In addition, the fact that we are controlled by one shareholder may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in our management or voting control.

Hurricanes and other severe weather conditions could cause a disruption in our operations, which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

Our U.S. operations are located in Georgia and Florida, regions that are susceptible to hurricanes. In the past, hurricanes have forced the closure of some of our stores, resulting in a reduction in net sales during such periods. Future hurricanes could disrupt our U.S. operations and could have an adverse effect on our overall results of operations. In addition, severe weather such as ice storms, snow storms and blizzards in Canada can cause conditions that could materially affect peak holiday shopping.

Terrorist acts or other catastrophic events could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Terrorist acts, acts of war or hostility, natural disasters or other catastrophic events could have an immediate disproportionate impact on discretionary spending on luxury goods upon which our operations are dependent. For example, in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks carried out on September 11, 2001, tourism and business travel was significantly reduced in all of our markets, which had an adverse impact on our net sales. Similarly, the SARS epidemic in Toronto, Ontario in the spring of 2003 had an adverse impact on net sales in our stores in that region. Similar future events could have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

7

##### Table of Contents

We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property and may be required to engage in costly litigation as a protective measure.

To establish and protect our intellectual property rights, we rely upon a combination of trademark and trade secret laws, together with licenses, exclusivity agreements and other contractual covenants. In particular, the “Birks” and “Mayors” trademarks are of significant value to our retail operations. The measures we take to protect our intellectual property rights may prove inadequate to prevent misappropriation of our intellectual property. Monitoring the unauthorized use of our intellectual property is difficult. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Litigation of this type could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources, may result in counterclaims or other claims against us and could significantly harm our results of operations.

A significant privacy breach of our information systems could disrupt or negatively affect our business.

The protection of customer, employee and company data is important to us, and our customers expect that their personal information will be adequately protected. Although we have developed and implemented systems and processes that are designed to protect our information and prevent data loss and other security breaches, such measures cannot provide absolute security. We rely upon information technology networks and systems, some of which are managed by third parties, to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes and activities, including e-commerce sales, supply chain, merchandise distribution, customer invoicing and collection of payments. We use information technology systems to record, process and summarize financial information and results of operations for internal reporting purposes and to comply with regulatory financial reporting, legal and tax requirements. The secure operation of these information technology networks, and the processing and maintenance of this information is critical to our business operations and strategy. A significant breach of customer, employee or company data could damage our reputation, our relationship with customers and the Birks or Mayors brands and could result in lost sales, sizable fines, significant breach-notification costs and lawsuits as well as adversely affect results of operations. In addition, it could harm our ability to execute our business and adversely impact sales, costs and earnings. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate cost-effective preventative measures. We may need to expend significant resources to protect against security breaches or to address problems caused by breaches.

Failure to successfully implement or make changes to information systems could disrupt or negatively impact our business.

In addition to regularly evaluating and making changes and upgrades to our information systems, we have begun to implement since fiscal 2016, a new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system with the Microsoft Dynamics AX for Retail platform in order to update our retail systems including point of sale (POS), supply chain, warehouse management and finance. While we follow a disciplined methodology when evaluating and making such changes, there can be no assurances that we will successfully implement such changes, that such changes will occur without disruptions to our operations, that the new or upgraded systems will achieve the desired business objectives or that the internal controls will be effective in preventing misstatements in financial reporting. Any such disruptions, inadequate internal controls or the failure to successfully implement new or upgraded systems such as those referenced above, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and could also affect our reputation, our relationship with customers and our brands.

The Company conducts retail operations within the United States and Canada, supplies itself from several sources within and outside North America, and has cross border financing arrangements. The risks of doing business internationally could increase its costs, reduce its profits, disrupt its business, or impact its reputation and brand development strategy.

The Company generates all of its net sales in North America. The Company also relies on certain foreign third-party vendors and suppliers. As a result, the Company is subject to the risks of doing business in jurisdictions within and outside North America, including:

| • |  | the laws, regulations and policies of governments relating to loans and operations, the costs or desirability of complying with local practices and customs and the impact of various anti-corruption, anti-money laundering and other laws affecting the activities of the Company;

| • |  | potential negative consequences from changes in taxation policies or currency restructurings;

| • |  | potential negative consequences from the application of taxation policies, including transfer pricing rules and sales tax matters;

| • |  | import and export licensing requirements and regulations, as well as unforeseen changes in regulatory requirements;

| • |  | economic instability in foreign countries;

| • |  | uncertainties as to enforcement of certain contract and other rights;

8

##### Table of Contents

| • |  | the potential for rapid and unexpected changes in government, economic and political policies, political or civil unrest, acts of terrorism or the threat of boycotts; and

| • |  | inventory risk exposures.

While these factors and the effect of these factors are difficult to predict, any one or more of them could lower the Company’s revenues, impact its cash flow, increase its costs, reduce its earnings or disrupt its business.

Risks Related to Class A Voting Shares

Our share price could be adversely affected if a large number of Class A voting shares are offered for sale or sold.

Future issuances or sales of a substantial number of our Class A voting shares by us, Montrovest, Mangrove, or another significant shareholder in the public market could adversely affect the price of our Class A voting shares, which may impair our ability to raise capital through future issuances of equity securities. As of May 31, 2017, we had 10,242,911 Class A voting shares issued and outstanding. Sales of restricted securities in the public market, or the availability of these Class A voting shares for sale, could adversely affect the market price of Class A voting shares.

As a retail jeweler with a limited public float, the price of our Class A voting shares may fluctuate substantially, which could negatively affect the value of our Class A voting shares and could result in securities class action claims against us.

The price of our Class A voting shares may fluctuate substantially due to, among other things, the following factors: (1) fluctuations in the price of the shares of a small number of public companies in the retail jewelry business; (2) additions or departures of key personnel; (3) announcements of legal proceedings or regulatory matters; and (4) general volatility in the stock market. The market price of our Class A voting shares could also fluctuate substantially if we fail to meet or exceed expectations for our financial results or if there is a change in financial estimates or securities analysts’ recommendations.

Significant price and value fluctuations have occurred in the past with respect to the securities of retail jewelry and related companies. In addition, because the public float of our Class A voting shares is relatively small, the market price of our Class A voting shares is likely to be volatile. There is limited trading volume in our Class A voting shares, rendering them subject to significant price volatility. In addition, the stock market has experienced volatility that has affected the market prices of equity securities of many companies, and that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies. A number of other factors, many of which are beyond our control, could also cause the market price of our Class A voting shares to fluctuate substantially. In the past, following periods of downward volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, class action litigation has often been pursued. If our Class A voting shares were similarly volatile and litigation was pursued against us, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

We are governed by the laws of Canada, and, as a result, it may not be possible for shareholders to enforce civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the U.S.

We are governed by the laws of Canada. A substantial portion of our assets are located outside the U.S. and some of our directors and officers are residents outside of the U.S. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service within the U.S. upon us or our directors and officers, or to realize in the U.S. upon judgments of courts of the U.S. predicated upon civil liability of Birks Group and such directors or officers under U.S. federal securities laws. There is doubt as to the enforceability in Canada by a court in original actions, or in actions to enforce judgments of U.S. courts, of the civil liabilities predicated upon U.S. federal securities laws.

We expect to maintain our status as a “foreign private issuer” under the rules and regulations of the SEC and, thus, are exempt from a number of rules under the Exchange Act of 1934 and are permitted to file less information with the SEC than a company incorporated in the U.S.

As a “foreign private issuer,” we are exempt from rules under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“the Exchange Act”) that impose certain disclosure and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. In addition, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules under the Exchange Act with respect to their purchases and sales of our Class A voting shares. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act, nor are we required to comply with Regulation Fair Disclosure, which restricts the selective disclosure of material information. Accordingly, there may be less publicly available information concerning us than there is for other U.S. public companies.

9

##### Table of Contents

If we were treated as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) some holders of our Class A voting shares would be subject to additional taxation, which could cause the price of our Class A voting shares to decline.

We believe that our Class A voting shares should not be treated as stock of a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and we expect to continue operations in such a manner that we will not be a PFIC. If, however, we are or become a PFIC, some holders of our Class A voting shares could be subject to additional U.S. federal income taxes on gains recognized with respect to our Class A voting shares and on certain distributions, plus an interest charge on certain taxes treated as having been deferred under the PFIC rules.

Our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting may identify “material weaknesses” in the future and may result in an attestation with an adverse or qualified opinion from our independent auditors, which could reduce confidence in our financial statements and negatively affect the price of our securities.

We are subject to reporting obligations under U.S. securities laws. Beginning with our Annual Report on Form 20-F for fiscal 2008, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us to prepare a management report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Our management may conclude that our internal control over our financial reporting is not effective. If at any time in the future, we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, market perception of our financial condition and the trading price of our stock may be adversely affected and customer perception of our business may suffer, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Further, our auditors do not audit our internal controls over financial reporting due to our market capitalization, and therefore, there has been no independent attestation of our internal controls over financial reporting.

If the costs and burden of being a public company outweigh its benefits, we may in the future decide to discontinue our status as a publicly traded company.

As a public company, we currently incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the NYSE MKT LLC (“NYSE MKT”), have imposed various requirements on public companies, including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls as well as mandating certain corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel devote a substantial amount of time and financial resources to these compliance initiatives. As such, if it is determined in the future that the costs and efforts of being a public company outweigh the benefits of being a public company, we may decide to discontinue our status as a publicly traded or registered company.

10

##### Table of Contents

Item 4. | Information on the Company

THE COMPANY

Corporate History and Overview

Birks Group is a leading North American prestige jewelry brand which designs, develops, produces and retails fine jewelry, timepieces, and gifts. As of May 31, 2017, Birks Group operated 46 prestige jewelry stores, 26 stores under the Birks brand, located in all major cities across Canada, 2 retail locations in Calgary and Vancouver under the Brinkhaus brand, 17 stores under the Mayors brand, located in Florida and Georgia, and 1 store under the Rolex brand name. As a prestige jeweler, most of our jewelry products are made of 18 karat gold, platinum or sterling silver, with or without precious gemstones, with significant emphasis on quality craftsmanship and distinctive design. For fiscal 2017, we had net sales of $286.9 million.

Birks’ predecessor company was founded in Montreal in 1879 and developed over the years into Canada’s premier designer, manufacturer and retailer of fine jewelry, timepieces, sterling and plated silverware and gifts. In addition to being a nationwide retailer with a strong brand identity, we are also highly regarded in Canada as a designer and producer of jewelry. We believe that operating our stores under the Birks brand and the fact that we sell Birks-branded jewelry distinguishes us from many competitors because of our longstanding reputation and heritage of being trustworthy, offering only the highest standard of quality and craftsmanship and products, our ability to offer distinctively designed, exclusive products, and a large selection of distinctive high quality merchandise at many different price points, and by placing a strong emphasis on providing a superior shopping experience to our clients.

Birks was purchased by Borgosesia Acquisitions Corporation in 1993, a predecessor company of Regaluxe Investment S.á.r.l., which is referred to in this Annual Report as “Regaluxe”. Effective March 28, 2006, Regaluxe was acquired through a merger with Iniziativa S.A. (“Iniziativa”). As of May 31, 2007 and June 4, 2007, respectively, following a reorganization, Iniziativa and Montrolux S.A. transferred all of the shares they respectively held in the Company to their parent company, Montrovest. Following the 1993 acquisition of Birks, Birks’ operations were evaluated and a program of returning Birks to its historic core strength as the leading Canadian prestige jeweler was initiated.

In August 2002, Birks invested $15.05 million to acquire approximately 72% of the voting control in Mayors, which was experiencing an unsuccessful expansion beyond its core markets and was incurring significant losses.

Between August 2002 and November 2005, it became apparent to both Mayors and Birks management that it was in the best interests of the shareholders to combine its operations. The Company believed that such combination would create a stronger capital base, improve operating efficiencies, reduce the impact of regional issues, simplify the corporate ownership of Mayors, eliminate management and board of directors’ inefficiencies with managing intercompany issues, and possibly increase shareholder liquidity. Upon the consummation of the merger on November 14, 2005, each outstanding share of Mayors common stock not then owned by Birks was converted into 0.08695 Class A voting shares of Birks. As a result of the merger, Mayors common stock ceased trading on the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) and Birks Group began trading on the AMEX, which is now known as the NYSE MKT, under the trading symbol “BGI.” Following the merger, Birks Group worked very diligently to fully integrate the Birks business with Mayors. As a result of the merger, we believe Birks Group has improved operational efficiencies and diversity and depth of its products and distribution capabilities.

In December 2015, Montrovest transferred a portion of its Class A and Class B voting shares to Mangrove and as a result Montrovest owns 49.3% of the voting shares of the Company and Mangrove owns 26.7%.

In the last three fiscal years, we invested a total of approximately $18.2 million in capital expenditures primarily associated with remodeling existing stores and the opening of new stores. We expect to invest an additional $11.9 million of capital expenditures in fiscal 2018 primarily related to store remodels, store relocations associated with lease renewals and the new ERP implementation. Approximately 15% of the capital expenditure investments will be in the U.S. and 85% will be in Canada. We expect to finance these capital expenditures in the U.S. and Canada from operating cash flows, existing financing arrangements and when possible from other additional sources of financing.

The Company regularly reviews the locations of its retail network that leads to decisions that impact the opening, relocation or closing of these locations. During fiscal 2017, as a result of our review, we did not close any Birks or Mayors stores. During fiscal 2016, as a result of our review, we did not close any Mayors stores. We did, however, relocate one store in Fort Lauderdale, Florida to a smaller location. In Canada during fiscal 2016, we did close one Birks store in St. John, New Brunswick, and opened one Birks store in Edmonton, Alberta. Two Birks stores were relocated in Laval, Quebec and Etobicoke, Ontario.

11

##### Table of Contents

Our sales are divided into two principal product categories: jewelry and timepieces. Jewelry also includes sales of other product offerings we sell such as giftware, as well as repair and custom design services.

The following table compares our sales of each product category for the last three fiscal years (dollars in thousands):

|  | Fiscal Year-Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
Jewelry and other |  | $ | 122,405 |  |  |  | 42.7 | % |  | $ | 127,220 |  |  |  | 44.5 | % |  | $ | 141,781 |  |  |  | 47.0 | %
Timepieces |  |  | 164,516 |  |  |  | 57.3 | % |  |  | 158,606 |  |  |  | 55.5 | % |  |  | 159,856 |  |  |  | 53.0 | %
Total |  | $ | 286,921 |  |  |  | 100 | % |  | $ | 285,826 |  |  |  | 100.0 | % |  | $ | 301,637 |  |  |  | 100.0 | %

The following table sets forth our operations in geographic markets in which we operate (dollars in thousands):

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
Net sales |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Canada (1) |  | $ | 116,436 |  |  | $ | 128,651 |  |  | $ | 143,384 |
U.S. |  |  | 170,485 |  |  |  | 157,175 |  |  |  | 158,253 |
Total net sales |  | $ | 286,921 |  |  | $ | 285,826 |  |  | $ | 301,637 |
Long-lived assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Canada |  | $ | 13,921 |  |  | $ | 18,610 |  |  | $ | 17,072 |
U.S. |  |  | 9,259 |  |  |  | 11,302 |  |  |  | 11,957 |
Total long-lived assets |  | $ | 23,180 |  |  | $ | 29,912 |  |  | $ | 29,029 |

(1) | The below table outlines the Canadian dollar equivalent of sales in Canada (CAD in thousands):

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
Net sales in Canada |  | $ | 152,992 |  |  | $ | 168,451 |  |  | $ | 162,859 |

Birks Group is a Canadian corporation. Our corporate headquarters are located at 2020 Robert Bourassa, Suite 200, Montreal, Québec, Canada H3A 2A5. Our telephone number is (514) 397-2501. Our website is www.birksgroup.com.

12

##### Table of Contents

Products

We offer distinctively designed, exclusive products and a large selection of distinctive high quality merchandise at many different price points. This merchandise includes designer jewelry, diamond, gemstone, and precious metal jewelry, timepieces and giftware. Part of our strategy is to increase our exclusive offering of internally designed and/or produced goods sold to our customers, consisting primarily of bridal, fine jewelry and timepieces, all of which leverage the Birks and Mayors brands’ loyalty in their respective markets and in order to differentiate our products with unique and exclusive designs.

Our Canadian stores, operating under the Birks and Brinkhaus brands, carry a large selection of prestigious brand name timepieces, including our own proprietary watch line as well as timepieces made by Baume & Mercier, Breitling, Bvlgari, Cartier, Frédérique Constant, Montblanc, Panerai, Rolex, Tag Heuer, Tudor, Vacheron Constantin and Van Cleef & Arpels. We also carry an exclusive collection of high quality jewelry and timepieces that we design. We emphasize our own jewelry offerings but also include designer jewelry made by Bvlgari, Marco Bicego, Messika, Roberto Coin, and Van Cleef & Arpels, most of which are exclusive to our stores in Canada. Our two Brinkhaus retail locations also offer Cartier, IWC, Panerai, Patek Philippe and Rolex timepieces. We also offer a variety of high quality giftware, including writing instruments made by Montblanc.

Our U.S. stores, operating under the Mayors brand, carry a large selection of prestigious brand name timepieces, including Baume & Mercier, Breitling, Bvlgari, Cartier, Frédérique Constant, Jaeger Le Coultre, IWC, Montblanc, Patek Philippe, Panerai, Rolex, Tag Heuer, Tudor, and Vacheron Constantin. Designer jewelry offerings in our stores operating under the Mayors brand include jewelry made by Bvlgari, DiModolo, Kwiat, Messika, Mikimoto, Pasquale Bruni, Roberto Coin, and writing instruments made by Montblanc. In addition, stores operating under the Mayors brand carry Birks-branded jewelry products on an exclusive basis in their markets. Our Rolex store offers exclusively Rolex brand timepieces.

We have one primary channel of distribution: the retail division, which accounts for approximately 99% of net sales, as well as three other channels of distribution, including e-commerce, gold exchange and wholesale, which combined account for approximately 1% of net sales.

Product Design, Development, Sourcing and Manufacturing

We established a product development process that supports our strategy to further develop and enhance our product offering in support of the Birks brand development. During fiscal 2017, fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, approximately 37%, 42%, and 48%, respectively, of our jewelry products acquired for sale were internally designed, sourced or produced. Products that are not designed and internally manufactured are sourced from suppliers worldwide, enabling us to sell an assortment of fine quality merchandise often not available from other jewelers in our markets. Our staff of buyers procures distinctive high quality merchandise directly from manufacturers, diamond cutters, and other suppliers worldwide. Our loose stone acquisition team, product sourcing team and category managers specialize in sourcing merchandise in categories such as diamonds, precious gemstones, pearls, timepieces, gold jewelry, and giftware. Retail and merchandising personnel frequently visit our stores and those of competitors to compare value, selection, and service, as well as to observe client reaction to merchandise selection and determine future needs and trends.

Availability of Products

Although purchases of several critical raw materials, notably platinum, gold, silver, diamonds, pearls and gemstones, are made from a relatively limited number of sources, we believe that there are numerous alternative sources for all raw materials used in the manufacture of our finished jewelry, and that the failure of any principal supplier would not have a material adverse effect on our operations. Any material changes in foreign or domestic laws and policies affecting international trade may have a material adverse effect on the availability of the diamonds, other gemstones, precious metals and non-jewelry products we purchase. Significant changes in the availability or prices of diamonds, gemstones and precious metals we require for our products could adversely affect our earnings. We do not maintain long-term inventories or otherwise hedge a material portion of the price of raw materials. A significant increase in the price of these materials could adversely affect our net sales, gross margin and earnings. However, in the event of price increases, we will generally attempt to pass along any price increases to our customers.

In fiscal 2017, we purchased jewelry, timepieces and giftware for sale in our stores from several suppliers. Many of these suppliers have long-standing relationships with us. We compete with other jewelry retailers for access to vendors that will provide us with the quality and quantity of merchandise necessary to operate our business. Our relationships with primary suppliers are generally not pursuant to long-term agreements. Although we believe that

13

##### Table of Contents

alternative sources of supply are available, the abrupt loss of any of our key vendors, especially our largest luxury timepiece supplier, or a decline in the quality or quantity of merchandise supplied by our vendors could cause significant disruption in our business. In fiscal 2017, merchandise supplied by our largest luxury timepiece supplier and sold through our stores operating under the Mayors, Birks, Rolex and Brinkhaus brands accounted for approximately 42% of our total net sales. If our largest luxury timepiece supplier terminated its distribution agreements with us, such termination would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. We believe that current relationships with our key vendors are good.

Seasonality

Our sales are highly seasonal, with the third fiscal quarter (which includes the holiday shopping season) historically contributing significantly higher net sales than any other quarter during the year. Net sales in the first, second, third and fourth quarters in fiscal 2017 were 24%, 21%, 35% and 20%, in fiscal 2016 were 25%, 22%, 32% and 21% and in fiscal 2015 were 25%, 22%, 32% and 21%.

Retail Operations, Merchandising and Marketing

General

We believe we are differentiated from most of our competitors because we offer distinctively designed, exclusive products and a selection of distinctive high quality merchandise at a wide range of price points. We keep the majority of our inventory on display in our stores rather than at our distribution facility. Although each store stocks a representative selection of jewelry, timepieces, giftware and other accessories, certain inventory is tailored to meet local tastes and historical merchandise sales patterns of specific stores.

We believe that our stores’ elegant surroundings and distinctive merchandise displays play an important role in providing an atmosphere that encourages sales. We pay careful attention to detail in the design and layout of each store, particularly lighting, colors, choice of materials, and placement of display cases. We also use window displays as a means of attracting walk-in traffic and reinforcing our distinctive image. Our Visual Display department designs and creates window and store merchandise case displays for all of our stores. Window displays are frequently changed to provide variety and to reflect seasonal events such as Christmas, Chinese New Year, Valentine’s Day, Mother’s Day and Father’s Day.

Personnel and Training

We place substantial emphasis on the professionalism of our sales force to maintain our position as a leading prestige jeweler. We strive to hire only highly motivated, professional and customer-oriented individuals. All new sales professionals attend an intensive training program where they are trained in technical areas of the jewelry business, specific sales and service techniques and our commitment to client service. Management believes that attentive personal service and knowledgeable sales professionals are key components to our success.

As part of our commitment to continuous, on-the-job training, we have established “Birks University” and “Mayors University”, a formalized system of in-house training with a primary focus on client service, selling skills and product knowledge that involves extensive classroom training, the use of detailed operational manuals, in-store mentorship programs and a leading edge product knowledge program which includes on-line testing. In addition, we conduct in-house training seminars on a periodic basis and administer training modules with audits to (i) enhance the quality and professionalism of all sales professionals, (ii) measure the level of knowledge of each sales professional, (iii) update sales professionals on changes to credit programs available to customers and changes to applicable laws, including anti-money laundering legislation, and (iv) identify needs for additional training. We also provide all management team members with more extensive training that emphasizes leadership skills, general management skills, “on-the-job” coaching and training instruction techniques.

14

##### Table of Contents

Advertising and Promotion

One of our key marketing goals is to build on our reputation in our core markets as a leading prestige jewelry brand offering high quality merchandise in an elegant, sophisticated environment. For example, we frequently run advertisements that associate the “Birks” and “Mayors” brands with internationally recognized brand names such as Cartier, Patek Philippe, Rolex, and Van Cleef & Arpels, among others. Advertising and promotions for all stores are developed by our personnel in conjunction with outside creative professionals.

Our advertising reinforces our role as a world class prestige brand that aims to deliver a total shopping experience that is as memorable as our merchandise. Our marketing efforts consist of advertising campaigns on digital platforms (including the two brands’ web sites), billboards, print, direct mail, magazine, special events, media and public relations, distinctive store design, elegant displays, partnerships with key suppliers and associations with prestige institutions. The key goals of our marketing initiatives are to enhance customer awareness and appreciation of our two retail brands, Birks and Mayors, as well as the Birks product brand, and to increase customer traffic, client acquisition and retention and net sales.

Credit Operations

We have two private label credit cards, one for each of our Birks and Mayors retail brands which are administered by third-party banks that own the credit card receivable balances. In addition, stores operating under the Mayors brand also have a Mayors proprietary credit card which we administer.

Our credit programs are intended to complement our overall merchandising and sales strategy by encouraging larger and more frequent sales to a loyal customer base. Sales under the Birks and Mayors private label credit cards accounted for approximately 27% of our net sales during fiscal 2017 and 26% during fiscal 2016. Sales under the Birks and Mayors private label credit cards are generally made without credit recourse to us. However, we are permitted to ask the bank to approve credit purchases under these private label credit cards, for which the bank holds credit recourses against the Company if the customer does not pay. These recourse credit lines are limited to 25% and 20% of the nonrecourse credit lines issued by the banks for the private label Birks credit card and Mayors credit card, respectively. Receivables generated on sales under the Mayors proprietary credit card are recorded on our balance sheet since we maintain the full credit risk.

Distribution

Our retail locations receive the majority of their merchandise directly from our distribution warehouses located in Fort Lauderdale, Florida and Montreal, Québec. Merchandise is shipped from the distribution warehouse utilizing various air and ground carriers. We also transfer merchandise between retail locations to balance inventory levels and to fulfill client requests, and a very small portion of merchandise is delivered directly to the retail locations from suppliers.

Competition

Our research indicates that the North American retail jewelry industry is approximately an $80 billion industry and is highly competitive and fragmented, with a few very large national and international competitors and many medium and small regional and local competitors. The market is also fragmented by price and quality. Although our Birks and Mayors retail brands are prestige jewelry brands, we compete with companies within and outside of this segment, including other luxury categories. Our competitors include national and international jewelry chains as well as independent regional and local jewelry retailers. We also compete with other types of retailers such as department stores and specialty stores and, to a lesser extent, catalog showrooms, discounters, direct mail suppliers, televised home shopping networks, and e-commerce pure players. Many of these competitors have greater financial resources than we do. We believe that competition in our markets is based primarily on the total brand experience including trust, quality craftsmanship, product design and exclusivity, product selection, marketing and branding elements (including web), service excellence, including after sales service, and, to a certain extent, price. With the current consolidation of the retail industry, we believe that competition with other general and specialty retailers and discounters will continue to increase. Our success will depend on various factors, including general economic and business conditions affecting consumer spending, the performance of national and international retail operations, the acceptance by consumers of our merchandising and marketing programs, store locations and our ability to properly staff and manage our stores.

Regulation

Our operations are affected by numerous federal, provincial and state laws that impose disclosure and other requirements upon the origination, servicing and enforcement of credit accounts and limitations on the maximum

15

##### Table of Contents

amount of finance charges that may be charged by a credit provider. In addition to our proprietary and private label credit cards, credit to our clients is primarily available through third-party credit cards such as American Express®, Discover®, MasterCard®, Union Pay® and Visa®, without recourse to us in the case of a client’s failure to pay. Any change in the regulation of credit that would materially limit the availability of credit to our traditional customer base could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We generally utilize the services of independent customs agents to comply with U.S. and Canadian customs laws in connection with our purchases of gold, diamond and other jewelry merchandise from foreign sources.

Diamonds extracted from certain regions in Africa, including Zimbabwe, that are believed to be used to fund terrorist activities, are considered conflict diamonds. We support the Kimberley Process, an international initiative intended to ensure diamonds are not illegally traded to fund conflict. As part of this initiative, we require our diamond suppliers to acknowledge compliance with the Kimberley Process and invoices received for diamonds purchased by us must include a certification from the vendor that the diamonds and diamond-containing jewelry are conflict free. Through this process and other efforts, we believe that the suppliers from whom we purchase diamonds exclude conflict diamonds from their inventories.

In August 2012, the SEC issued rules that require companies that manufacture products using certain “conflict minerals”, including gold, to determine whether those minerals originated in the Democratic Republic of Congo or adjoining countries (“DRC”). If the minerals originate in the DRC, or if companies are not able to establish where they originated, extensive disclosure regarding the sources of those minerals, and in some instances an independent audit of the supply chain, is required. We filed our third disclosure report on May 25, 2016 for the calendar year ended December 31, 2015 and our fourth disclosure report on May 30, 2017 for the calendar year ended December 31, 2016. We determined that we had no reason to believe that any conflict minerals necessary to the functionality or production of our products may have originated in the DRC.

Trademarks and Copyrights

The designations Birks and Mayors, and the Birks and Mayors logos, are our principal trademarks and are essential to our ability to maintain our competitive position in the prestige jewelry segment. We maintain a program to protect our trademarks and will institute legal action where necessary to prevent others from either registering or using marks that are considered to create a likelihood of confusion with our trademarks. We are also the owner of the original jewelry designs created by our in-house designers and have entered into agreements with several outside designers pursuant to which these designers have assigned to us the rights to use copyrights of designs and products created for us.

Organizational Structure

The following chart sets forth our ownership interest in each of our significant subsidiaries as of March 25, 2017:

Name |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |  | Ownership and Voting Interest |
Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc. |  | Delaware |  |  | 100 | %
Mayor’s Jewelers of Florida, Inc. |  | Florida |  |  | 100 | %

Properties

In December 2000, we entered into a capital lease agreement for our Montreal head office and store pursuant to which we sold and leased back the building, including the Montreal flagship store, for a term of 20 years ending December 11, 2020. The net annual rental rate was CAD$2.2 million (approximately $1.6 million U.S. dollars) for the period that ended on December 11, 2016. On November 1, 2016, we entered into an agreement with the new owner of the building to terminate the existing lease agreement for the building in advance of its expiry date in December 2020 and to lease the premises for our flagship store at its current location, which is an operating lease. As a result, a capital lease asset of CAD $8.7 million (approximately $6.5 million in U.S. dollars) and a capital lease obligation of CAD $11.6 million (approximately $8.7 million in U.S. dollars) at November 1, 2016 were derecognized and a non-cash gain of CAD $2.9 million (approximately $2.2 million in U.S. dollars) (included as part of other long-term liabilities) is being deferred and amortized over the term of the new lease of the flagship store.

Our U.S. retail operations were managed through a local office located in Tamarac, Florida until June 13, 2017. On September 13, 2004, we entered into an operating lease agreement for this location for a term of 15 years

16

##### Table of Contents

terminating on November 30, 2020. The current net annual base rental rate is $769,520 for the period ending November 30, 2017. We have two options to renew for five years each. On March 9, 2015, we entered into an agreement to sublease 23,175 square feet or approximately 48% of the Tamarac office space to a third party. On August 8, 2016, our sub-tenant gave us notice of their intention to exercise their option to sublease an additional 1,600 square feet of the Tamarac office space, effective April 12, 2017, bringing the total subleased space to 24,775 square feet or approximately 51%. On November 7, 2016, our sub-tenant gave us notice of their intention to exercise their option to sublease an additional 11,859 square feet, effective August 19, 2017, which will bring the total subleased space to 36,634 square feet, or 76%. The current annual sublease rental rate is $628,170 for the period ending April 8, 2018. The sublease term ends on November 30, 2020. We have relocated the corporate office to other premises in Fort Lauderdale, Florida on June 13, 2017.

We lease all of our store locations. We believe that all of our facilities are well maintained and in good condition and are adequate for our current needs. We are actively reviewing all leases that expire in the next 12 months to determine whether to renew the leases.

Following is a listing of all our properties as of March 25, 2017:

|  | Size (Square Feet) |  |  | Expiration of Lease |  |  | Location |
Operating Stores |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Canada: Bayshore Centre |  |  | 2,544 |  |  |  | September 2017 |  |  |  | Ottawa, ON |
Bloor |  |  | 7,157 |  |  |  | July, 2028 |  |  |  | Toronto, ON |
Brinkhaus |  |  | 1,946 |  |  |  | March 2022 |  |  |  | Calgary, AB |
Brinkhaus (1) |  |  | 750 |  |  |  | May 2017 |  |  |  | Vancouver, BC |
Carrefour Laval |  |  | 2,617 |  |  |  | April 2025 |  |  |  | Laval, QC |
Chinook Shopping Centre |  |  | 3,661 |  |  |  | September 2024 |  |  |  | Calgary, AB |
Dix-30 Mall |  |  | 1,691 |  |  |  | July 2023 |  |  |  | Brossard, QC |
Fairview Pointe-Claire |  |  | 4,210 |  |  |  | March 2018 |  |  |  | Pointe-Claire, QC |
First Canadian Place (2) |  |  | 2,243 |  |  |  | May 2017 |  |  |  | Toronto, ON |
Edmonton Manulife Centre |  |  | 4,196 |  |  |  | May 2018 |  |  |  | Edmonton, AB |
Mapleview Centre |  |  | 1,384 |  |  |  | June 2023 |  |  |  | Burlington, ON |
Montreal Flagship Store |  |  | 19,785 |  |  |  | April 2032 |  |  |  | Montreal, QC |
Oakridge Shopping Centre |  |  | 2,244 |  |  |  | March 2018 |  |  |  | Vancouver, BC |
Park Royal |  |  | 1,797 |  |  |  | April 2024 |  |  |  | West Vancouver, BC |
Canada (continued): Place Ste-Foy |  |  | 2,366 |  |  |  | June 2018 |  |  |  | Ste-Foy, QC |
Rideau Centre |  |  | 2,745 |  |  |  | May 2024 |  |  |  | Ottawa, ON |
Saskatoon |  |  | 3,486 |  |  |  | October 2020 |  |  |  | Saskatoon, SK |
Sherway Gardens |  |  | 2,726 |  |  |  | September 2025 |  |  |  | Etobicoke, ON |
Southgate Shopping Centre |  |  | 2,915 |  |  |  | March 2018 |  |  |  | Edmonton, AB |
Square One |  |  | 1,825 |  |  |  | May 2024 |  |  |  | Mississauga, ON |
Toronto Dominion Square |  |  | 5,568 |  |  |  | January 2022 |  |  |  | Calgary, AB |
Toronto Eaton Centre |  |  | 1,042 |  |  |  | January 2018 |  |  |  | Toronto, ON |
Vancouver |  |  | 20,221 |  |  |  | January 2026 |  |  |  | Vancouver, BC |
Victoria |  |  | 1,561 |  |  |  | March 2019 |  |  |  | Victoria, BC |
West Edmonton Mall |  |  | 2,244 |  |  |  | October 2024 |  |  |  | Edmonton, AB |
Willowdale Fairview Mall |  |  | 2,353 |  |  |  | February 2018 |  |  |  | North York, ON |
Winnipeg |  |  | 3,187 |  |  |  | February 2023 |  |  |  | Winnipeg, MB |
Yorkdale |  |  | 2,930 |  |  |  | October 2026 |  |  |  | Toronto, ON |
United States: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Aventura Mall |  |  | 3,447 |  |  |  | January 2024 |  |  |  | N. Miami Beach, FL |
Town Center at Boca Raton |  |  | 5,878 |  |  |  | January 2027 |  |  |  | Boca Raton, FL |
Dadeland Mall |  |  | 5,700 |  |  |  | January 2027 |  |  |  | Miami, FL |
Florida Mall |  |  | 5,070 |  |  |  | March 2020 |  |  |  | Orlando, FL |
The Galleria at Fort Lauderdale |  |  | 2,467 |  |  |  | April 2025 |  |  |  | Fort Lauderdale, FL |
The Gardens Mall |  |  | 5,099 |  |  |  | January 2020 |  |  |  | Palm Beach Gardens, FL |
International Plaza |  |  | 5,583 |  |  |  | January 2022 |  |  |  | Tampa, FL |
Lenox Square Mall |  |  | 2,991 |  |  |  | January 2029 |  |  |  | Atlanta, GA |
Lincoln Road |  |  | 4,250 |  |  |  | May 2019 |  |  |  | Miami Beach, FL |
Mall at Millenia |  |  | 2,088 |  |  |  | February 2023 |  |  |  | Orlando, FL |

17

##### Table of Contents

|  | Size (Square Feet) |  |  | Expiration of Lease |  | Location |
Operating Stores |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Miami International Mall |  |  | 3,246 |  |  | January 2026 |  |  | Miami, FL |
North Point Mall |  |  | 1,145 |  |  | March 2022 |  |  | Alpharetta, GA |
Rolex Store in Mall at Millenia |  |  | 1,171 |  |  | January 2020 |  |  | Orlando, FL |
Phipps Plaza |  |  | 2,182 |  |  | January 2021 |  |  | Atlanta, GA |
Village of Merrick Park |  |  | 4,894 |  |  | January 2023 |  |  | Coral Gables, FL |
Weston Commons |  |  | 4,000 |  |  | July 2017 |  |  | Weston, FL |
St-John’s Town Center |  |  | 3,458 |  |  | March 2023 |  |  | Jacksonville, FL |
University Town Center |  |  | 1,734 |  |  | January 2025 |  |  | Sarasota, FL |
Other Properties |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Tamarac Corporate office (3) |  |  | 47,851 |  |  | November 2020 |  |  | Tamarac, FL |
Montreal Corporate office (4) |  |  | 58,444 |  |  | December 2020 |  |  | Montreal, QC |

(1) | As of May 31, 2017, we are currently in advanced negotiations with the landlord to finalize a relocation of the Brinkhaus store in Vancouver, British Columbia.

(2) | As of May 31, 2017, we are currently in advanced negations with the landlord to finalize an extension of the lease for the First Canadian Place store in Toronto, Ontario.

(3) | We have signed an agreement to sublease 23,175 square feet of our Tamarac Corporate Office to a third-party. The sublease commenced in April 2015 with sublease expiration in November 2020. On August 8, 2016, our sub-tenant gave us notice of their intention to exercise their option to sublease an additional 1,600 square feet of the Tamarac office space, effective April 12, 2017, bringing the total sub-leased space to 24,775 square feet or approximately 51%. On November 7, 2016, our sub-tenant gave us notice of their intention to exercise their option to sublease an additional 11,859 square feet, effective August 19, 2017, which will bring the total sub-leased space to 36,634 square feet, or 76%. We have relocated the corporate office to other premises in Fort Lauderdale, Florida on June 13, 2017.

(4) | We entered into an agreement effective November 1, 2016, with the new owner of the building which houses the Company’s corporate head office and its flagship store in Montreal, Québec, to terminate the existing lease agreement for the building in advance of its expiry date in December 2020 and to only lease the premises for the Company’s flagship store at its current location. We have relocated the corporate head office to other premises in the Montreal downtown area on May 5, 2017.

Total annual base rent for the above locations for fiscal 2017 was approximately $15.1 million.

Item 4A. | Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable

Item 5. | Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following discussion includes certain forward-looking statements. For a discussion of important factors, including the continuing development of our business, actions of regulatory authorities and competitors and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from the results referred to in the forward-looking statements, see Item 3., “Key Information” under the heading “Risk Factors” and the discussion under the heading “Forward-Looking Information” at the beginning of this Annual Report.

Throughout this Annual Report we refer to our fiscal years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015 as fiscal 2017, fiscal 2016, and fiscal 2015, respectively. Our fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in March of each year. The financial reporting periods referred to as fiscal 2017, fiscal 2016, and fiscal 2015 consisted of 52 weeks.

Overview

Birks Group is a leading designer, producer and purveyor of prestige jewelry, timepieces and giftware in the U.S. and Canada. As of March 25, 2017, our retail operation’s total square footage was approximately 177,000. The average square footage of our three Birks flagship stores in Canada was approximately 15,700, while the average square footage for all other Birks retail stores in Canada was approximately 2,700. The average square footage of our two Brinkhaus locations was 1,300, while the average square footage of our Mayors retail stores was approximately 3,600.

We operate our business in two geographic areas, Canada and the Southeastern U.S. We have two reportable segments, “Retail” and “Other.” “Retail” is comprised of all our retail operations in the U.S. and Canada on a

18

##### Table of Contents

combined basis. In Canada, we operate stores under the Birks brand and two stores under the Brinkhaus brand. In the Southeastern U.S., we operate stores under the Mayors brand and one store under the Rolex brand. “Other” consists of e-commerce, gold exchange, wholesale and up until August 2015 included our corporate sales division that was sold.

Our net sales are comprised of revenues, net of discounts, in each case, excluding sales tax. Sales are recognized at the point of sale when merchandise is taken or shipped. Sales of consignment merchandise are recognized on a full retail basis at such time that the merchandise is sold. Revenues for gift certificates and store credits are recognized upon redemption. Customers use cash, cheques, debit cards, third-party credit cards, private label and proprietary credit cards and house accounts to make purchases. The level of our sales is impacted by the number of transactions we generate and the size of our average retail sale.

Our operating costs and expenses are primarily comprised of cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses. Cost of sales includes cost of merchandise, direct inbound freight and duties, direct labor related to repair services, the costs of our design and creative departments, manufacturing costs, inventory shrink, damage and obsolescence, jewelry, watch and giftware boxes, as well as depreciation and amortization of production facilities and production tools, dies and molds and, in addition, product development costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) include, but are not limited to, all non-production payroll and benefits (including non-cash compensation expense and commissions), store and head office occupancy costs, overhead, credit card fees, information systems, professional services, consulting fees, repairs and maintenance, travel and entertainment, insurance, legal, human resources and training expenses. Occupancy, overhead and depreciation are generally less variable relative to net sales than other components of SG&A, such as credit card fees and certain elements of payroll, such as commissions. Another significant item in SG&A is marketing expenses, which include marketing, public relations and advertising costs (net of amounts received from vendors for cooperative advertising) incurred to increase customer awareness of both our retail brands and the Birks product brand. Marketing has historically represented a significant portion of our SG&A. As a percentage of net sales, marketing expenses represented 3.0%, 3.1% and 3.1% of sales for fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Additionally, SG&A includes indirect costs such as freight, including inter-store transfers, receiving costs, distribution costs, and warehousing costs. The amount of these indirect costs in SG&A was approximately $2.2 million, $2.4 million and $2.9 million for fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation and amortization of our stores and head office, including buildings, leasehold improvements, furniture and fixtures, computer hardware and software and amortization of intangibles.

Over the short-term, we may focus our efforts on those strategies and key drivers of our performance that are necessary in the current business climate, which include our ability to:

| • |  | grow sales, gross margin rate and gross profits;

| • |  | manage expenses and assets efficiently in order to optimize profitability and cash flow; and

| • |  | maintain flexible and cost effective sources of borrowings to finance our operations and strategies.

Over the long-term, we believe that the key drivers of our performance will be our ability to:

| • |  | execute our merchandising strategy to increase net sales and maintain and expand gross margin by developing and marketing higher margin exclusive and unique products, and further developing our internal capability to design, develop, and source products;

| • |  | execute our marketing strategy to enhance customer awareness and appreciation of the Birks and Mayors retail brands, as well as the Birks product brand, taking into account today’s path to purchase, and to maintain and eventually increase customer traffic, client acquisition and retention and net sales through regional and national advertising campaigns utilizing digital channels (including the two brands’ web sites) billboards, print, direct mail, magazine, in-store events, community relations, media relations, partnerships with key suppliers, such as Mayors’ relationship with Rolex and Birks’ relationship with Van Cleef & Arpels, and associations with prestige institutions;

| • |  | continue to develop the Birks product brand through expansion of all sales channels including international channels of distribution and e-commerce;

| • |  | provide a superior client experience through consistent outstanding customer service that will ensure customer satisfaction and promote frequent customer visits, customer loyalty, and strong customer relationships; and

| • |  | increase our retail stores’ average retail transaction, conversion rate, productivity of our store professionals and inventory and four-wall profitability.

19

##### Table of Contents

Foreign Currency

Because we have operations in the U.S. and Canada, our results are affected by foreign exchange rate changes. Revenue and expenses incurred in Canadian dollars are translated into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. Changes in the value of the Canadian dollar compared to the U.S. dollar between periods may materially impact our results and may materially affect period over period comparisons. Over the past several years, the value of the Canadian dollar has varied significantly compared to the U.S. dollar which has impacted the level of our borrowing capacity and, for reporting purposes, in some instances, has resulted in material fluctuations in our net sales, expenses and our profits from our Canadian operations, when expressed in U.S. dollars. As of March 25, 2017, we had not hedged these foreign exchange rate risks.

20

##### Table of Contents

Fiscal 2017 Summary

| • |  | Net sales were $286.9 million for fiscal 2017, an increase of $1.1 million compared to net sales of $285.8 million in fiscal 2016. Net sales were $3.6 million higher than last year on a constant currency basis (see “Non-GAAP measures”) after excluding $2.5 million of lower sales due to the translation of the Company’s Canadian sales into U.S. dollars with a weaker Canadian dollar;

| • |  | Comparable store sales and comparable store sales calculated on a constant-exchange rate basis (see “Non-GAAP measures”) both increased by 1% compared to the prior fiscal year ended March 26, 2016;

| • |  | Gross profit was $108.4 million, or 37.8% of net sales, for fiscal 2017, compared to $109.4 million, or 38.3% of net sales, for fiscal 2016. The reduction of 50 basis points in gross margin percentage is mainly due to product sales mix and the impact of foreign exchange. Gross profit was $0.6 million lower than last year calculated on a constant currency basis (see “Non-GAAP measures”) after excluding the $0.4 million of lower gross profit due to the translation of the Company’s Canadian gross profit into U.S. dollars with a weaker Canadian dollar;

| • |  | SG&A expenses were $94.2 million, or 32.8% of net sales, in fiscal 2017 compared to $91.1 million, or 31.9% of net sales, in fiscal 2016. The increase is mainly due to additional direct variable costs driven by higher U.S sales and due to the increased use of in-house credit plans that attracted new customers during fiscal 2017, partially offset by the efficiencies that resulted from the operational restructuring plan that was initiated in fiscal 2015;

| • |  | The Company’s fiscal 2017 reported operating income was $8.3 million, a decrease of $7.2 million compared to $15.5 million for fiscal 2016. Adjusted operating income (see “Non-GAAP measures”) , which excludes restructuring costs, was $9.2 million, a decrease of $3.8 million compared to $13.0 million in fiscal 2016 (excluding restructuring costs and gain on sale of assets);

| • |  | The Company recognized a net income for fiscal 2017 of $4.9 million, or $0.27 per share, compared to net income of $5.4 million, or $0.30 per share in fiscal 2016. Excluding the impact of $0.8 million of restructuring charges recorded during fiscal 2017, the Company’s net income for fiscal 2017 was $5.7 million, or $0.32 per share, compared to a net income of $3.0 million or $0.17 per share for fiscal 2016 after excluding the $0.8 million restructuring charges and the $3.2 million of gain on sale of assets.

Comparable Store Sales

We use comparable store sales as a key performance measure for our business. We do not include our non-retail store sales in comparable store calculations. Stores enter the comparable store calculation in their thirteenth full month of operation under our ownership. Stores that have been resized and stores that are relocated are evaluated on a case-by-case basis to determine if they are functionally the same store or a new store and then are included or excluded from comparable store sales, accordingly. Comparable store sales is calculated on a constant-exchange rate basis (see “Non-GAAP measures”) which eliminates the positive and negative effects that result from translating Canadian sales into U.S. dollars due to the strengthening or weakening of the Canadian dollar in comparison to the U.S. dollar. Comparable store sales measures the percentage change in net sales for comparable stores in a period compared to the corresponding period in the previous year. If a comparable store is not open for the entirety of both periods, comparable store sales measures the change in net sales for the portion of time that such store was open in both periods. We believe that this measure provides meaningful information on our performance and operating results. However, readers should know that this financial metric has no standardized meaning and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies.

The percentage increase in comparable store sales for the periods presented below is as follows:

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
Canada |  |  | (8 | )% |  |  | 6 | % |  |  | 12 | %
U.S. |  |  | 9 | % |  |  | 1 | % |  |  | 19 | %
Total |  |  | 1 | % |  |  | 3 | % |  |  | 16 | %

The comparable store sales increase of 1% reflects an 8% comparable store sale decrease in Canada and a 9% comparable store sales increase in the U.S. The increase in comparable store sales during fiscal 2017 was primarily related to increases in our average retail sale transaction, transaction volume and conversion rates in the U.S, partially offset by a decrease in traffic and transaction volume in Canada. In fiscal 2016, and fiscal 2015, the increase in comparable store sales was primarily related to an increase in our average retail sale transaction in both the U.S. and Canada.

21

##### Table of Contents

The increase in comparable store sales in the U.S was primarily related to a higher average sale transaction driven by higher timepiece sales reflecting the success of our strategy to introduce new watch brands while expanding our offering of select watch and fine jewelry brands. The Birks-branded line of jewelry also saw a successful performance in Mayors stores during the year. The decrease in comparable store sales in Canada was primarily driven by a significant decrease in traffic and decreased discretionary spending, partially related to difficult economic conditions in Western Canada and decreased spending by certain affluent tourists due to foreign imposed restrictions on the movement of funds out of their home country.

Results of Operations

The following is a discussion of factors affecting our results of operations for fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Fiscal 2017 Compared to Fiscal 2016

The following table sets forth, for fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, the amounts in our consolidated statements of operations:

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Net sales |  | $ | 286,921 |  |  | $ | 285,826 |
Cost of sales |  |  | 178,487 |  |  |  | 176,439 |
Gross profit |  |  | 108,434 |  |  |  | 109,387 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |  |  | 94,226 |  |  |  | 91,125 |
Restructuring charges |  |  | 842 |  |  |  | 754 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 5,034 |  |  |  | 5,229 |
Gain on sale of assets |  |  | — |  |  |  | (3,229 | )
Total operating expenses |  |  | 100,102 |  |  |  | 93,879 |
Operating income |  |  | 8,332 |  |  |  | 15,508 |
Interest and other financing costs |  |  | 8,681 |  |  |  | 10,020 |
Income (loss) before income taxes |  |  | (349 | ) |  |  | 5,488 |
Income tax (recovery) expense |  |  | (5,277 | ) |  |  | 50 |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | 4,928 |  |  | $ | 5,438 |

Net Sales

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Net sales – Retail |  | $ | 283,807 |  |  | $ | 281,940 |
Net sales – Other |  |  | 3,114 |  |  |  | 3,886 |
Total Net Sales |  | $ | 286,921 |  |  | $ | 285,826 |

Net Sales. Net sales for fiscal 2017 were $286.9 million compared to $285.8 million for fiscal 2016, which is an increase of $1.1 million, or 0.4%, as compared to fiscal 2016. Net retail sales were $4.5 million higher than last year on a constant currency basis (see “Non-GAAP measures”) after excluding the $2.6 million of lower sales due to the translation of the Company’s Canadian sales into U.S. dollars with a weaker Canadian dollar due to a comparable store sales increase of 1%. The decrease in Net Sales – Other of $0.7 million related primarily to a decrease in corporate sales (division sold in fiscal 2016) of $0.9 million, partially offset by $0.2 million of higher e-commerce and wholesale sales.

Gross Profit

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Gross Profit – Retail |  | $ | 108,487 |  |  | $ | 110,023 |
Gross Profit – Other |  |  | (53 | ) |  |  | (636 | )
Total Gross Profit |  | $ | 108,434 |  |  | $ | 109,387 |

22

##### Table of Contents

Gross Profit. Gross profit for fiscal 2017 was $108.4 million, or 37.8% of net sales, as compared to $109.4 million, or 38.3% of net sales, in fiscal 2016. Gross profit was $0.6 million lower than last year on a constant currency basis(see “Non-GAAP measures”) after excluding the $0.4 million of lower gross profit due to the translation of the Company’s Canadian gross profit into U.S. dollars with a weaker Canadian dollar. The reduction of 50 basis points in gross margin percentage is mainly due to the product sales mix and the impact of foreign exchange.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. SG&A expenses were $94.2 million, or 32.8% of net sales, in fiscal 2017 compared to $91.1 million, or 31.9% of net sales, in fiscal 2016. The increase is mainly due to additional direct variable costs driven by higher U.S sales and due to the increased use of in-house credit plans that attracted new customers during fiscal 2017, partially offset by the efficiencies that resulted from the operational restructuring plan that was initiated in fiscal 2015.

Restructuring Charges. During fiscal 2017, we incurred $0.8 million of restructuring charges associated with the second phase of our operational restructuring plan launched in fiscal 2015, compared to $0.8 million in fiscal 2016 as part of the first phase of the restructuring plan. In July 2014, we provided to our senior secured lenders and announced an operational restructuring plan to reduce corporate overhead costs, improve profitability and drive efficiency within the organization. The restructuring plan included consolidating most of our corporate administrative workforce from our regional office in Tamarac, Florida to our Montreal corporate head office as well as the outsourcing of a portion of our jewelry manufacturing and other corporate head office staff reductions. In February 2017, we began the second phase of the operational restructuring plan, incurring restructuring charges of approximately $0.8 million in fiscal 2017 primarily associated with severance, as we eliminated certain corporate administrative positions to further increase efficiency.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense during fiscal 2017 was $5.0 million compared to $5.2 million during fiscal 2016.

Interest and Other Financing Costs. Interest and financing costs in fiscal 2017 were $8.7 million compared to $10.0 million in fiscal 2016. In fiscal 2017 the Company recorded debt amendment charges of $0.1 million related to legal costs as a result of the Company’s amendments to its senior secured term loan and senior secured revolving credit facility in December 2016.

Income Tax Recovery. In fiscal 2017 the Company recorded an income tax recovery of $5.3 million, as compared to income tax expense of $50,000 in fiscal 2016. In fiscal 2017, the Company determined that there is sufficient positive evidence to conclude that it is more likely than not that deferred taxes of $5.3 million are realizable in the foreseeable future (1 to 3 years). The relatively low amount of tax expense in fiscal 2016 is due to the utilization of unrecognized losses carryforward, and relates solely to alternative minimum tax expense from U.S. operations.

Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015

The following table sets forth, for fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, the amounts in our consolidated statements of operations:

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Net sales |  | $ | 285,826 |  |  | $ | 301,637 |
Cost of sales |  |  | 176,439 |  |  |  | 183,832 |
Gross profit |  |  | 109,387 |  |  |  | 117,805 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |  |  | 91,125 |  |  |  | 103,735 |
Restructuring charges |  |  | 754 |  |  |  | 2,604 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 5,229 |  |  |  | 5,932 |
Gain on sale of assets |  |  | (3,229 | ) |  |  | — |
Impairment of long-lived assets |  |  | — |  |  |  | 238 |
Total operating expenses |  |  | 93,879 |  |  |  | 112,509 |
Operating income |  |  | 15,508 |  |  |  | 5,296 |
Interest and other financing costs |  |  | 10,020 |  |  |  | 11,285 |
Debt extinguishment charges |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,643 |
Income (loss) before income taxes |  |  | 5,488 |  |  |  | (8,632 | )
Income tax expense |  |  | 50 |  |  |  | — |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | 5,438 |  |  | $ | (8,632 | )

23

##### Table of Contents

Net Sales

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Net sales – Retail |  | $ | 281,940 |  |  | $ | 293,146 |
Net sales – Other |  |  | 3,886 |  |  |  | 8,491 |
Total Net Sales |  | $ | 285,826 |  |  | $ | 301,637 |

Net Sales. Net sales for fiscal 2016 were $285.8 million compared to $301.6 million for fiscal 2015, which is a decrease of $15.8 million, or 5.2%, as compared to fiscal 2015. Net retail sales were $8.4 million higher than last year on a constant currency basis(see “Non-GAAP measures”) after excluding the $19.6 million of lower sales due to the translating of the Company’s Canadian sales into U.S. dollars with a weaker Canadian dollar due to a comparable store sales increase of 3%, and $6.4 million in higher sales at two new stores and two stores temporarily closed for relocation in fiscal 2015, partially offset by $7.3 million of lower sales related to the closure of six unprofitable stores in the past two years and the temporary closure of one store for relocation in fiscal 2016. The decrease in Net Sales – Other of $4.6 million related primarily to the disposal of the corporate sales division during fiscal 2016 and to $0.7 million of lower sales due to the translation of non-retail Canadian sales into U.S. dollars with a weaker Canadian dollar.

The comparable store sales increase of 3% reflects a 6% comparable store sale increase in Canada and a 1% comparable store sales increase in the U.S. despite reduced tourist activity in Florida due to the strong U.S. dollar. The increases in comparable store sales in both regions were primarily related to an increase in the Company’s average sale transaction. The increase in comparable store sales in the U.S. was primarily related to the success of the Company’s timepiece strategy, while the increase in comparable store sales in Canada was primarily driven by the Company’s fine jewelry business and higher timepiece sales. The Birks-branded line of jewelry also experienced a successful performance in Mayors stores during the year.

24

##### Table of Contents

Gross Profit

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Gross Profit – Retail |  | $ | 110,023 |  |  | $ | 118,128 |
Gross Profit – Other |  |  | (636 | ) |  |  | (323 | )
Total Gross Profit |  | $ | 109,387 |  |  | $ | 117,805 |

Gross Profit. Gross profit for fiscal 2016 was $109.4 million, or 38.3% of net sales, as compared to $117.8 million, or 39.1% of net sales, in fiscal 2015. Gross profit was in line with last year on a constant currency basis (see “Non-GAAP measures”), after excluding the $8.3 million of lower gross profit due to the translation of the Company’s Canadian gross profit into U.S. dollars with a weaker Canadian dollar. The 80 basis point decrease in gross margin was primarily attributable to a decrease in retail gross margin associated with product sales mix and the impact of foreign exchange.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. SG&A expenses were $91.1 million, or 31.9% of net sales, for fiscal 2016 compared to $103.7 million, or 34.4% of net sales, for fiscal 2015. The operational restructuring plan launched in fiscal 2015 to reduce overhead costs, improve profitability and drive efficiency within the organization was an important factor in the reduction of the SG&A expenses in fiscal 2016. Other factors that explain the $12.6 million decrease in SG&A expenses during fiscal 2016, as compared to fiscal 2015, include $2.5 million of lower expenses related to the closure of six store locations in fiscal 2016 and 2015; $1.2 million of lower expenses related to the disposal of the corporate sales division in fiscal 2016; and $7.5 million of lower expenses related to foreign currency translation of the Company’s Canadian SG&A expenses into U.S. dollars with a weaker Canadian dollar, partially offset by $1.3 million of higher expenses related to two new store openings during the last two fiscal years and two stores that were temporarily closed for relocation in fiscal 2015.

Restructuring Charges. During fiscal 2016, the Company also incurred $0.8 million of restructuring charges associated with its operational restructuring plan launched in fiscal 2015, a decrease of $1.8 million compared to fiscal 2015. These charges represented the last of the expected costs related to the restructuring plan. In July 2014, we provided to our senior secured lenders and announced an operational restructuring plan to reduce corporate overhead costs, improve profitability and drive efficiency within the organization. The restructuring plan included consolidating most of our corporate administrative workforce from our regional office in Tamarac, Florida to our Montreal corporate head office as well as the outsourcing of a portion of our jewelry manufacturing and other corporate head office staff reductions. During fiscal 2015, we recorded $2.6 million of restructuring charges. These charges included $1.4 million of severance and employee retention related charges and $0.6 million of transition related charges associated with the consolidation of positions to Montreal including temporary duplication of salary during the transition, recruitment costs for positions transferred to Montreal and travel and relocation costs. Restructuring charges also included the recording of a $0.5 million loss on the sublet of a portion of the Tamarac facility and $0.1 million of commission cost associated with the sublease agreement.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense during fiscal 2016 was $5.2 million compared to $5.9 million during fiscal 2015. In fiscal 2016, depreciation and amortization expense was in line with fiscal 2015 after excluding $0.4 million of lower expense due to the translation of the Company’s Canadian depreciation and amortization expense into U.S. dollars with a weaker Canadian dollar.

Gain on sale of assets. During fiscal 2016, the Company realized a $3.2 million gain on sale of assets as part of the sale of its corporate sales division, which also included the execution of a supply and licensing agreement for Birks products and Birks branded products. Under the executed agreement, the assets of the Company’s corporate sales division were sold for gross proceeds of $4.3 million.

Interest and Other Financing Costs. Interest and financing costs in fiscal 2016 were in line with fiscal 2015 after excluding $0.7 million of lower costs attributable to translating the Company’s Canadian financing costs into U.S. dollars with a weaker Canadian dollar. In fiscal 2015 the Company recorded debt extinguishment charges of $2.6 million related to new and deferred financing costs as a result of the Company’s amendments to its senior secured term loan and senior secured revolving credit line in June and November 2014.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense was $50,000 for fiscal 2016, as compared to nil for fiscal 2015. The relatively low amount of tax expense in fiscal 2016 is due to the utilization of unrecognized losses carryforward, and relates solely to alternative minimum tax expense from U.S. operations. Income tax expense was nil in fiscal 2015 due to losses incurred. In addition, we are recording a 100% valuation allowances on the full value of the deferred tax assets generated by our U.S. and Canadian operations as the criteria for the recognition of these assets was not met at March 26, 2016.

25

##### Table of Contents

NON-GAAP MEASURES

The Company reports information in accordance with U.S Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S GAAP”). The Company’s performance is monitored and evaluated using various sales and earnings measures that are adjusted to include or exclude amounts from the most directly comparable GAAP measure (“non-GAAP measures”). The Company presents such non-GAAP measures in reporting its financial results to investors and other external stakeholders to provide them with useful complimentary information which will allow them to evaluate the Company’s operating results using the same financial measures and metrics used by the Company in evaluating performance. The Company does not, nor does it suggest that investors and other external stakeholders should, consider non-GAAP measures in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with U.S GAAP. These non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures presented by other companies.

Constant currency basis

The Company evaluates its sales performance using non-GAAP measures which eliminates the foreign exchange effects of translating net sales, comparable store sales and gross profit made in Canadian dollars to U.S dollars (constant currency basis or constant exchange rate basis). Net sales, comparable store sales, gross profit and expenses on a constant exchange rate basis are calculated by taking the current period’s sales, gross profit and expenses in local currency and translating them into U.S dollars using the prior period’s foreign exchange rates. The Company believes that such measures provide useful supplemental information with which to assess the Company’s performance relative to the corresponding period in the prior year. The following tables reconcile the net sales, comparable store sales and gross profit increases (decreases) from GAAP to non-GAAP versus the previous year:

Constant Exchange Rate Basis Reconciliation |  | Fiscal 2017 vs. Fiscal 2016 |  |  | Fiscal 2016 vs. Fiscal 2015 |
|  | GAAP |  |  | Translation Effect |  |  | Constant Exchange Rate Basis |  |  | GAAP |  |  | Translation Effect |  |  | Constant Exchange Rate Basis |
Net Sales (in $ 000’s) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net sales - Retail |  |  | 1,867 |  |  |  | (2,619 | ) |  |  | 4,486 |  |  |  | (11,206 | ) |  |  | (19,606 | ) |  |  | 8,400 |
Net sales - Other |  |  | (772 | ) |  |  | 146 |  |  |  | (918 | ) |  |  | (4,605 | ) |  |  | (556 | ) |  |  | (4,049 | )
Total Net Sales |  |  | 1,095 |  |  |  | (2,473 | ) |  |  | 3,568 |  |  |  | (15,811 | ) |  |  | (20,162 | ) |  |  | 4,351 |
Gross Profit (in $ 000’s) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total Gross Profit |  |  | (953 | ) |  |  | (383 | ) |  |  | (570 | ) |  |  | (8,418 | ) |  |  | (8,349 | ) |  |  | (69 | )

26

##### Table of Contents

Constant Exchange Rate Basis Reconciliation |  | Fiscal 2017 vs. Fiscal 2016 |
|  | Comparable Store Sales |  |  | Translation Effect |  |  | Comparable Store Sales on a Constant Exchange Rate Basis |
Comparable Store Sales (in %) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Canada |  |  | -8 | % |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | -8 | %
U.S |  |  | 9 | % |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 9 | %
Total |  |  | 1 | % |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 1 | %
|  | Fiscal 2016 vs. Fiscal 2015 |
|  | Comparable Store Sales |  |  | Translation Effect |  |  | Comparable Store Sales on a Constant Exchange Rate Basis |
Comparable Store Sales (in %) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Canada |  |  | -8 | % |  |  | -14 | % |  |  | 6 | %
U.S |  |  | 1 | % |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 1 | %
Total |  |  | -4 | % |  |  | -7 | % |  |  | 3 | %
|  | Fiscal 2015 vs. Fiscal 2014 |
|  | Comparable Store Sales |  |  | Translation Effect |  |  | Comparable Store Sales on a Constant Exchange Rate Basis |
Comparable Store Sales (in %) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Canada |  |  | -8 | % |  |  | -20 | % |  |  | 12 | %
U.S |  |  | 19 | % |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 19 | %
Total |  |  | 1 | % |  |  | -15 | % |  |  | 16 | %

Adjusted operating expenses and adjusted operating income

The Company evaluates its operating earnings performance using financial measures which exclude expenses associated with operational restructuring plans, a non-recurring gain on disposal of the corporate sales division and impairment losses. The Company believes that such measures provide useful supplemental information with which to assess the Company’s results relative to the corresponding period in the prior year and can result in a more meaningful comparison of the Company’s performance between the periods presented. The table below provides a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures presented to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated with GAAP.

Reconciliation of non-GAAP measures |  | Year ended March 25, 2017 |
($‘000) |  | GAAP |  |  | Restructuring costs (a) |  |  | One-time gain (b) |  |  | Impairment loss (c) |  |  | Non- GAAP |
Operating expenses |  |  | 100,102 |  |  |  | (842 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 99,260 |
as a % of net sales |  |  | 34.9 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.6 | %
Operating income |  |  | 8,332 |  |  |  | 842 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 9,174 |
as a % of net sales |  |  | 2.9 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3.2 | %

27

##### Table of Contents

Reconciliation of non-GAAP measures |  | Year ended March 26, 2016 |
($‘000) |  | GAAP |  |  | Restructuring costs (a) |  |  | One-time gain (b) |  |  | Impairment loss (c) |  |  | Non- GAAP |
Operating expenses |  |  | 93,879 |  |  |  | (754 | ) |  |  | 3,229 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 96,354 |
as a % of net sales |  |  | 32.8 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.7 | %
Operating income |  |  | 15,508 |  |  |  | 754 |  |  |  | (3,229 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 13,033 |
as a % of net sales |  |  | 5.4 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4.6 | %
Reconciliation of non-GAAP measures |  | Year ended March 28, 2015 |
($‘000) |  | GAAP |  |  | Restructuring costs (a) |  |  | One-time gain (b) |  |  | Impairment loss (c) |  |  | Non- GAAP |
Operating expenses |  |  | 112,509 |  |  |  | (2,604 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (238 | ) |  |  | 109,667 |
as a % of net sales |  |  | 37.3 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36.4 | %
Operating income |  |  | 5,296 |  |  |  | 2,604 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 238 |  |  |  | 8,138 |
as a % of net sales |  |  | 1.8 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2.7 | %

(a) | Expenses associated with the Company’s operational restructuring plan

(b) | Non-recurring gain on disposal of assets resulting from the Company’s sale of its corporate sales division in fiscal 2016

(c) | Non-recurring loss associated with the decision to abandon a software project and a Birks retail shop-in-shop in fiscal 2015

Sale of Assets

On August 4, 2015, the Company sold the assets of its corporate sales division to Rideau for proceeds of $4.3 million. The disposal is consistent with the Company’s long-term strategy to concentrate on its retail operations and develop its Birks product brand through its current retail network, as well as internationally through other channels, and to concentrate the Company’s resources and efforts on its core activities. On August 4, 2015, the carrying amount of the major classes of assets that were sold was comprised primarily of inventory of $0.8 million, resulting in a gain on disposal of assets in the amount of approximately $3.2 million. Furthermore, as part of the agreement, the Company will supply Rideau, with Birks-branded time pieces and jewelry and will receive ongoing royalty payments from Rideau, related to future sales of all Birks-branded products. Rideau has agreed to purchase a minimum aggregate amount of CAD $4.5 million (approximately $3.4 million in U.S dollars) of Birks-branded products for the first three years, and CAD $2.0 million (approximately $1.5 million in U.S dollars) per year for each contract year thereafter for a period of 7 years.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our ability to fund our operations and meet our cash flow requirements in order to fund our operations is dependent upon our ability to maintain positive excess availability under our senior secured revolving credit facility. As of March 25, 2017, we had approximately $70.4 million outstanding on our $110 million senior secured revolving credit facility. Our excess borrowing capacity, which was above $6.0 million throughout fiscal 2017 (and above $8.0 million prior to the execution of the December 2016 amendment to the terms of the senior secured revolving credit facility and senior secured term loan), was $14.6 million as of March 25, 2017 and $16.2 million as of March 26, 2016. Our senior secured revolving credit facility along with our senior secured term loan are used to finance working capital, finance capital expenditures, provide liquidity to fund our day-to-day operations and for other general corporate purposes. The terms of our senior secured credit facilities require us to maintain positive excess availability at all times.

In December 2016, the Company executed an amendment to the terms of its $110.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility to extend the maturity from August 22, 2017 to the earlier to occur of (a) December 21, 2021 or (b) the date that is 91 days prior to the maturity date then in effect with respect to the senior secured term

28

##### Table of Contents

loan debt. The Company also executed an amendment to the terms of its senior secured term loan to extend the maturity from August 22, 2018 to May 21, 2021 and to reduce the senior secured term loan amount from $33.0 million to $28.0 million, with the $5.0 million reduction in the senior secured term loan borrowed under the senior secured revolving credit facility. In addition, as part of the amendments to the senior secured revolving credit facility and the senior secured term loan, the minimum excess availability levels required to be maintained by the Company were reduced from $8.0 million under the current agreements to $6.0 million. The amendments to the senior secured revolving credit facility and the senior secured term loan also include a reduction to the minimum adjusted EBITDA levels and reduce the seasonal availability blocks imposed from December 20th to January 20th of each year from $12.5 million to $11.5 million and from January 21st to February 10th from $5.0 million to $4.0 million. Failure to meet the minimum adjusted EBITDA covenant in the event that availability falls below $6.0 million for any five consecutive business days is considered an event of default under the amended agreements, that could result in the outstanding balances borrowed under the Company’s senior secured term loan and senior secured revolving credit facility becoming due immediately, which would result in cross defaults on the Company’s other borrowings.

Under the terms of the amended senior secured facilities, the senior secured revolving credit facility administrative agent may, at any time, impose various reserves which would lower the level of borrowing availability under the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility (customary for asset-based loans), at their reasonable discretion, to: (i) ensure that the Company maintains adequate liquidity for the operation of its business, (ii) cover any deterioration in the amount or value of the collateral, and (iii) reflect impediments to the senior secured lenders to realize upon the collateral.

There is no limit to the amount of discretionary reserves that the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility administrative agent may impose at its reasonable discretion. No discretionary reserves were imposed during fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 by the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility administrative agent. While the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility lenders or their administrative agent have not historically imposed such a restriction, it is uncertain whether conditions could change and cause such a reserve to be imposed in the future. In addition, the value of the Company’s inventory is periodically assessed by its senior secured lenders and based upon these reviews the Company’s borrowing capacity could be significantly increased or decreased. Another factor impacting the Company’s excess availability includes, among other things, changes in the U.S. and Canadian dollar exchange rate, which could increase or decrease the Company’s borrowing availability. As of March 25, 2017, every 100 basis point strengthening or weakening of the Canadian versus the U.S. dollar would cause an approximately $41,000 increase or decrease, respectively, in the amount of excess availability. The Company met its excess availability requirement as of March 25, 2017 and as of the date of filing of this Form 20-F.

Both the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility and the senior secured term loan are subject to cross default provisions with all other loans pursuant to which if the Company is in default of any other loan, the Company will immediately be in default of both the senior secured revolving credit facility and the senior secured term loan.

The senior secured revolving credit facility also contains limitations on the Company’s ability to pay dividends, more specifically, among other limitations, the Company can pay dividends only at certain excess borrowing capacity thresholds and the aggregate dividend payment for the twelve-month period ended as of any fiscal quarter cannot exceed 33% of the consolidated net income for such twelve-month period. Additionally, the Company is required to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.30 to 1.00 and a minimum excess availability of $30 million in order to qualify for payment of dividends. Besides these financial covenants related to paying dividends, the terms of this facility provide that no financial covenants are required to be met other than already described.

29

##### Table of Contents

Senior Secured Facilities

Borrowings under our senior secured revolving credit facility for the periods indicated in the table below were as follows:

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Senior secured revolving credit facility availability |  | $ | 85,018 |  |  | $ | 79,429 |
Amount borrowed at year end |  | $ | 70,434 |  |  | $ | 63,209 |
Excess borrowing capacity at year end |  | $ | 14,584 |  |  | $ | 16,220 |
Average outstanding balance during the year |  | $ | 71,750 |  |  | $ | 68,205 |
Average excess borrowing capacity during the year |  | $ | 13,683 |  |  | $ | 13,351 |
Maximum borrowing outstanding during the year |  | $ | 83,615 |  |  | $ | 78,137 |
Minimum excess borrowing capacity during the year |  | $ | 6,174 |  |  | $ | 8,586 |
Weighted average interest rate for year |  |  | 3.2 | % |  |  | 3.2 | %

Investissement Québec

The Company has term loans outstanding in the aggregate amount of $4.0 million (CAD$5.3 million) at March 25, 2017 with Investissement Québec.

In November 2015, the Company amended the monthly capital requirements amounts of all term loans with Investissement Québec in order to reduce its short-term capital requirements. The impact of the amendment on the first twelve months following the effective date of the amendment translated to a reduction of CAD$2 million (approximately $1.5 million in U.S. dollars) of the monthly capital requirements. This amendment was agreed to by the senior secured lenders.

As of March 25, 2017, the Company had the following loans with Investissement Québec:

| • |  | CAD$2.0 million ($1.5 million in U.S. dollars) secured term loan of which CAD$1.4 million ($1.1 million in U.S dollars) remained outstanding, bearing interest at a rate of Canadian prime plus 10% per annum, which equated to 12.7% at March 25, 2017 and is repayable in 48 equal monthly payments of CAD$41,667 ($31,157 in U.S dollars) beginning in August 2015.

| • |  | CAD$5.0 million ($3.7 million in U.S. dollars) secured term loan of which CAD$2.9 million ($2.1 million in U.S. dollars) remained outstanding, bearing interest at a rate of Canadian prime plus 7.0% per annum, which equated to 9.7% at March 25, 2017 and is repayable in 60 equal monthly payments of CAD$83,333 ($62, 314 in U.S. dollars) beginning in October 2014.

| • |  | CAD$10.0 million ($7.5 million in U.S. dollars) secured term loan from of which CAD$1.0 million ($0.8 million in U.S. dollars) remained outstanding, bearing interest at a rate of Canadian prime plus 5.5% per annum, which equated to 8.2% at March 25, 2017 and is repayable in 36 equal monthly payments of CAD$208,333 ($155,786 in U.S. dollars) beginning in April 2013. In June 2014 we were granted a one year moratorium on the monthly capital repayment amount of CAD$208,333 ($155,786 in U.S. dollars). Subsequent to the twelve month moratorium, the monthly capital repayment amount of CAD$208,333 ($155,786 in U.S. dollars) commenced resulting in the repayment term being extended by twelve months.

The term loans with Investissement Québec require the Company on an annual basis to have a working capital ratio of at least 1.15. The Company was in compliance with the working capital ratio as of March 25, 2017.

Up until October 28, 2016, Investissement Quebec also required the Company to maintain an adjusted long-term debt to adjusted net assets ratio below 2.5, at which date Investisssment Quebec removed this covenant. The Company is not required to calculate this ratio for fiscal 2017. For each of fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, the Company received a waiver of default from Investissement Québec, once it determined that it would not be able to meet the adjusted long-term debt to adjusted net asset ratio levels required in the loans.

Capital Leases and Other Financing

In April 2016, we received capital lease funding of $0.5 million for telephone equipment located within our Canadian and U.S. operations. The lease financing is secured by the equipment and is repayable over 60 months at an annual interest rate of 3.6%.

30

##### Table of Contents

As of March 25, 2017, we also had a balance of $1.5 million outstanding from an original $5.0 million cash advance from our controlling shareholder, Montrovest. This advance is payable upon demand by Montrovest once conditions stipulated in our senior credit facilities permit such a payment. Commensurate with the amendment of our senior credit facilities, in June 2011, we amended the terms of the $5.0 million cash advance, reducing the annual interest rate from 16%, net of any withholding taxes, representing an effective interest of 17.8% to 11%, net of any withholding taxes, representing an effective interest rate of approximately 12.2%. In addition, the amended terms (i) eliminated the 7% fee required to be paid to Montrovest upon conversion of the advance into a convertible debenture or Class A voting shares, (ii) eliminated the convertibility of the cash advance into a convertible debenture or Class A voting share in the event of a private placement and (iii) required a one-time payment of a closing fee of $75,000. In August 2012, a partial repayment of $3.5 million was made on these cash advances as a result of the proceeds from a stock rights offering that we undertook in 2012.

The Company entered into a financing agreement effective May 11, 2017 with a new lender for a credit facility of up to $4.75 million of lease financing relating to certain equipment consisting of furniture, fixtures, and computer systems. As of the date of the issuance of these financial statements, the Company had borrowed approximately $2.2 million against this facility.

Cash Flows from Operating, Investing and Financing Activities

The following table summarizes cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities:

(in thousands) |  | Fiscal 2017 |  |  | Fiscal 2016 |  |  | Fiscal 2015 |
Net cash provided by (used in): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Operating activities |  | $ | 7,262 |  |  | $ | 4,704 |  |  | $ | 10,600 |
Investing activities |  |  | (5,072 | ) |  |  | (2,441 | ) |  |  | (6,325 | )
Financing activities |  |  | (2,587 | ) |  |  | (2,102 | ) |  |  | (4,057 | )
Effect of changes in exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | (173 | ) |  |  | (190 | )
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | (400 | ) |  | $ | (12 | ) |  | $ | 28 |

Net cash provided by operating activities was $7.3 million in fiscal 2017 as compared to $4.7 million in fiscal 2016. The $2.6 million increase in cash flows related to operating activities was primarily the result of an $11.9 million decrease in the level of inventory growth in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016 as well as the impact of the non-cash gain on sale of assets of $3.2 million recorded in fiscal 2016, partially offset by a decrease in net income of $0.5 million in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016, an increase in deferred tax assets in the U.S of $5.3 million in fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016, and a decrease of $5.2 million in the level of growth of liabilities in fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016. Inventories totaled $132.1 million at March 25, 2017, as compared to $137.8 million at March 26, 2016, a decrease of $5.7 million or 4.1%. Excluding the impact of $0.5 million of lower inventory due to translating the inventory of our Canadian operations to U.S. dollars with a relatively weaker Canadian dollar, inventory levels decreased by $5.3 million compared to prior year end. Accounts payable were $46.6 million at March 25, 2017 as compared to $46.7 million at March 26, 2016, a decrease of $0.1 million. Excluding the impact of $0.1 million of lower accounts payable due to translating the accounts payable of our Canadian operations to U.S. dollars with a relatively weaker Canadian dollar, accounts payable grew by $0.1 million.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $4.7 million during fiscal 2016 as compared to $10.6 million provided by operating activities during fiscal 2015. The $5.9 million decrease in cash flows related to operating activities was primarily the result of a $5.9 million increase in the level of inventory growth in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015 and a $8.3 million lower increase in the level of accounts payable in the current year compared to the prior fiscal year, partially offset by higher cash flows generated by the increase in net income. Inventories totaled $137.8 million at March 26, 2016, as compared to $135.7 million at March 28, 2015, an increase of $2.1 million or 1.5%. Excluding the impact of $3.6 million of lower inventory due to translating the inventory of our Canadian operations to U.S. dollars with a relatively weaker Canadian dollar, inventory levels increased by $5.7 million compared to prior year end. Accounts payable were $46.7 million at March 26, 2016, as compared to $44.7 million at March 28, 2015, an increase of $2.0 million. Excluding the impact of $1.1 million of lower accounts payable due to translating the accounts payable of our Canadian operations to U.S. dollars with a relatively weaker Canadian dollar, accounts payable grew by $3.1 million. The increase in payables was primarily due to the timing of purchases and payments compared to the prior year.

31

##### Table of Contents

During fiscal 2017, net cash used in investing activities was $5.1 million compared to $2.4 million used during fiscal 2016. The $2.7 million increase in net cash used in investing activities is primarily attributable to net proceeds of $4.1 million received related to the disposal of corporate sales division assets in fiscal 2016 offset by a decrease in capital expenditures over the prior fiscal year of $1.4 million.

During fiscal 2016, net cash used in investing activities was $2.4 million compared to $6.3 million used during fiscal 2015. The $3.9 million decrease in net cash used in investing activities is primarily attributable to net proceeds of $4.1 million received related to the disposal of corporate sales division assets, however the level of capital expenditures was consistent with the prior fiscal year.

Net cash used in financing activities was $2.6 million in fiscal 2017, as compared to $2.1 million during fiscal 2016. The $0.5 million variance in cash flows related to financing activities was primarily due to the Company’s increased bank indebtedness in fiscal 2017 which was offset by paying off other long-term debt amounts.

Net cash used in financing activities was $2.1 million in fiscal 2016, as compared to $4.1 million during fiscal 2015. The $2.0 million variance in cash flows related to financing activities was primarily due to a lower overall reduction in the level of long-term debt compared to the prior year of $8.3 million, partially offset by higher overall increase in the level of indebtedness of $7.7 million driven by the repayment of a $5.0 million tranche of the senior secured term loan, borrowed under the senior secured revolving credit facility. Overall debt levels have decreased by $9.2 million driven by the early termination of the Montreal building capital lease.

The following table details capital expenditures in fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015:

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
|  | (In thousands) |
New stores and renovations |  | $ | 1,927 |  |  | $ | 3,947 |  |  | $ | 3,980 |
Electronic equipment, computer hardware and software |  |  | 2,393 |  |  |  | 997 |  |  |  | 766 |
Furniture and fixtures |  |  | 767 |  |  |  | 1,833 |  |  |  | 1,301 |
Manufacturing equipment |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 16 |  |  |  | 19 |
Other |  |  | — |  |  |  | 201 |  |  |  | 3 |
Total capital expenditures (1) |  | $ | 5,091 |  |  | $ | 6,994 |  |  | $ | 6,069 |

(1) | Includes capital expenditures financed by capital leases of $376,000 in fiscal 2017, $43,000 in fiscal 2016, and $1.0 million in fiscal 2015 as well as capital expenditures included in accounts payable as of the end of the fiscal year.

Capital expenditures for fiscal 2018 are projected to be approximately $11.9 million and are expected to be used primarily for store remodeling and store relocations associated with lease renewals, the move of our Canadian and US corporate offices as well as the implementation of our new ERP system. The amount of planned capital expenditures for fiscal 2018 is higher than the amount spent in fiscal 2017. Approximately 15% of the company’s store leases are renewable within the next two years and we are currently in discussions with a number of landlords with respect to renewing at existing locations and/or moving to new locations, and such lease renewals or new leases may require capital expenditures. The capital expenditures related to retail store locations in both Canada and the U.S. are estimated to be approximately $13.9 million over the next two years to remodel, relocate or open new stores. Of the $13.9 million, we estimate that $8.1 million will be spent in fiscal 2018 leaving the balance to fiscal 2019. The availability of financing will impact our ability to renew leases or enter into new ones, which can in turn, impact the number of retail locations we operate and the level of sales we generate in the future.

Maintenance of sufficient availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed financing is necessary for us to fund our day-to-day operations. Our ability to make scheduled payments of principal, or to pay the interest or additional interest, if any, or to fund planned capital expenditures and store operations will depend on our ability to maintain adequate levels of available borrowing and our future performance, which to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors, as well as other events that are beyond our control. We believe that we currently have sufficient working capital to fund our operations. This belief is based on certain assumptions about the state of the economy, the availability of borrowings to fund our operations and estimates of projected operating performance. To the extent that the economy and other conditions affecting our business are significantly worse than we anticipate, we may not achieve our projected level of financial performance and we may determine that we do not have sufficient capital to fund our operations.

32

##### Table of Contents

The Company is actively engaged in identifying alternative sources of financing that include raising additional funds through public or private equity, the disposal of assets, and debt financing, including funding from governmental sources which may not be possible as the success of raising additional funds is beyond the Company’s control. The Company’s majority shareholder is not bound to provide this financing. The incurrence of additional indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could result in operating and financing covenants that could restrict the Company’s operations. Financing may be unavailable in amounts or on terms acceptable to the Company or at all, which may have a material adverse impact on its business, including its ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company believes that it will be able to adequately fund its operations and meet its cash flow requirements for at least the next twelve months. If the Company does not maintain positive excess availability under its senior secured revolving credit facilities and the lenders exercise their right to demand repayment of balances owed under these credit facilities, the Company may be unable to obtain additional financing. These financial statements do not reflect adjustments that would be necessary if the going concern assumption was not appropriate.

Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.

None.

Trend Information

During fiscal 2017, we were faced with several challenges such as declining traffic throughout Canada across the retail industry, a depressed bridal market throughout Canada caused by increased competition in the industry, an economic slowdown in Western Canada driven primarily by weak oil prices and the impact of the Fort McMurray fires, and a significant reduction in luxury spending by certain affluent tourists within our customer base. Increased competition for space in Canada continued to put pressure on occupancy costs and space retention for key locations. Third party brands continue to follow through on opening their own stores and closing distribution in select retail centers and lowering the margins that are earned by retailers impacting our gross margin levels. The continuing weakening of the Canadian dollar in comparison to the U.S. dollar, continued to increase costs of merchandise purchased in U.S. dollars by the Canadian operations and reduced the impact of the Canadian operations when translated to U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes.

We continue to pursue our strategy to develop the Birks product brand and in fiscal 2017, we launched several new collections under the Birks brand. In addition, we continued to pursue our strategies to enhance our customers’ in-store experience which included the remodeling of one Birks store in Canada to provide our clients with an engaging buying experience. The extent of our continuing investment in transforming our stores will be dependent upon our ability to raise additional capital to fund such a roll out and expansion.

Our gross profit margin has declined over the past five years primarily due to the success of our watch strategy and third party jewelry which resulted in a greater percentage of our sales being from third-party branded watches and jewelry which tend to have a lower margin compared to other products we sell as well as other changes in our product sales mix and the increased efforts over the past years to more quickly and aggressively sell through slow moving and discontinued product brands in an effort to improve the productivity and turnover of our inventory. Going forward, we believe that our gross profit margin will stabilize and begin to increase as we continue to promote the development of the Birks product brand which we expect will provide us with higher gross profit margins. Going forward, we also intend to execute our merchandising strategy to expand gross margins by developing and marketing exclusive and unique third-party branded products with higher margins.

Over the past few years we have also decreased the number of stores we operate through our closure of underperforming stores. Going forward we will continue to evaluate the productivity of our existing stores and close unproductive stores. In addition, we will be continuing to review opportunities to open new stores in new prime retail locations when the right opportunities exist.

Off-balance sheet arrangements

From time to time, we guarantee a portion of our private label credit card sales to our credit card vendor. As of March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, the amount guaranteed under such arrangements was approximately $8.4 million and $9.3 million, respectively. The bad debt experienced under these guarantees has not been material. See Note 14(b) to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for additional discussion. We had no other off-balance sheet arrangements as of March 25, 2017 other than our operating lease commitments as detailed below and in Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements.

33

##### Table of Contents

Commitments and Contractual Obligations

The following table discloses aggregate information about our contractual cash obligations as of March 25, 2017 and the periods in which payments are due:

|  | Payments due by Period |
|  | Total |  |  | Less Than 1 Year |  |  | 1-3 Years |  |  | 3-5 Years |  |  | More than 5 Years |
|  | (In thousands) |
Contractual Obligations |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Debt maturities(1) |  | $ | 102,867 |  |  | $ | 2,218 |  |  | $ | 99,149 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1,500 |
Capital lease obligations |  |  | 902 |  |  |  | 555 |  |  |  | 282 |  |  |  | 65 |  |  |  | — |
Interest on debt(2) |  |  | 10,260 |  |  |  | 3,254 |  |  |  | 5,282 |  |  |  | 1,559 |  |  |  | 165 |
Operating lease obligations(3) |  |  | 111,278 |  |  |  | 14,924 |  |  |  | 28,736 |  |  |  | 24,819 |  |  |  | 42,799 |
Total(4) |  | $ | 225,307 |  |  | $ | 20,951 |  |  | $ | 133,449 |  |  | $ | 26,443 |  |  | $ | 44,464 |

(1) | Includes bank indebtedness in the 1-3 year category to reflect the current expiration date of the line of credit.

(2) | Excludes interest payments on amounts outstanding under our senior secured revolving credit facility as the outstanding amounts fluctuate based on our working capital needs. Interest expense on variable rate debts was calculated assuming the rates in effect at March 25, 2017.

(3) | The operating lease obligations do not include insurance, taxes and common area maintenance (CAM) charges to which we are obligated. CAM charges were $3,659,000 in fiscal 2017, $3,643,000 in fiscal 2016, and $3,728,000 in fiscal 2015.

(4) | In addition to the above and as of March 25, 2017, we had $0.9 million of outstanding letters of credit.

Leases

We lease all of our retail locations under operating leases. Additionally, we have operating leases for certain equipment.

Operating leases for store locations are expensed over the term of the initial lease period. While lease renewal periods are available on most leases, renewal periods are not included in the accounting lease term because we believe there are no punitive terms or circumstances associated with non-renewal that would reasonably assure renewal. The accounting lease term typically includes a fixturing period and the rental payments are expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term. All reasonably assured rent escalations, rent holidays, and rent concessions are included when considering the straight-line rent to be expensed. Lease incentives are recorded as deferred rent and amortized as reductions to lease expense over the lease term. Contingent rent payments vary by lease, are based on a percentage of revenue above a predetermined sales level and are expensed when it becomes probable the sales levels will be achieved. This level is different for each location and includes and excludes various types of sales.

Leasehold improvements are capitalized and typically include fixturing and store renovations. Amortization of leasehold improvements begins on the date the asset was placed in service and extends to the lesser of the economic life of the leasehold improvement and the initial lease term.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in the financial statements and related notes. Since future events and their impact cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results may differ from those estimates. These estimates and assumptions are evaluated on an on-going basis and are based on historical experience and on various factors that are believed to be reasonable. We have identified certain critical accounting policies as noted below.

Going concern assumption

The Company believes that it will be able to adequately fund its operations and meet its cash flow requirements for at least the next twelve months. Our financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which assumes that we will continue our operations for the foreseeable future and be able to realize our assets and discharge our liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. In evaluating our ability to continue as a going concern, we are required to determine whether we have the ability to fund our operations and meet our cash flow requirements. This evaluation requires us to estimate and forecast our cash flows for at least the next twelve months from the filing date to determine whether we have sufficient availability under our senior secured

34

##### Table of Contents

revolving credit facility. Significant estimates that have the greatest impact on our analysis include our estimate of sales, gross margins and expenses, estimates of collateral values performed by our lenders throughout the year which could increase or decrease our availability under our senior secured revolving credit facility, timing of inventory acquisitions, vendor terms and payments, and interest rate and foreign exchange rate assumptions. Further, we have also made judgments on whether any reserves would be imposed by our senior secured credit facilities lenders. As part of our analysis, we also evaluated our ability to achieve minimum adjusted EBITDA levels (calculated on a twelve-month rolling basis as defined in the agreement) required by our senior secured term loan if and only if, for any five consecutive business days, our availability under our revolving line of credit falls below $6.0 million. Failure to meet the minimum adjusted EBITDA levels if our availability is below $6.0 million for any five consecutive business days, is considered an event of default that could result in the outstanding balances borrowed under our senior secured term loan and senior secured revolving credit facility becoming due immediately, which would result in cross defaults on the Company’s other borrowings. Significant variances from our assumptions used in preparing our going concern analysis could significantly impact our ability to meet our projected cash flows or if our senior secured lenders impose additional restrictions on our ability to borrow on our collateral or if we do not maintain positive excess availability under our senior secured credit facilities which is an event of default and the lenders have the right to demand repayment of balances owed under these credit facilities thus impacting our ability to meet our operations and cash flow requirements required to continue as a going concern.

Revenue recognition

Sales are recognized at the point of sale when merchandise is picked up by the customer or shipped. Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are included in net sales. Revenues for gift certificate sales and store credits are recognized upon redemption. Prior to recognition as a sale, gift certificates are recorded as accounts payable on the balance sheet. Based on historical redemption rates, a portion of certificates outstanding and not subject to unclaimed property laws are recorded as income. Certificates outstanding and subject to unclaimed property laws are maintained as accrued liabilities until remitted in accordance with local ordinance. Sales of consignment merchandise are recognized at such time as the merchandise is sold and are recorded on a gross basis because we are the primary obligor of the transaction, have general latitude on setting the price, have discretion as to the suppliers, are involved in the selection of the product and have inventory loss risk. Sales are reported net of returns and sales taxes. We generally give our customers the right to return merchandise purchased by them within 10 to 90 days, depending on the products sold and record a provision at the time of sale for the effect of the estimated returns. Repair sales are recorded at the time the service is rendered. Licensing fees are recognized when the product is delivered to and accepted by the customer.

Allowance for inventory shrink and slow moving inventory

The allowance for inventory shrink is estimated for the period from the last physical inventory date to the end of the reporting period on a store by store basis and at our distribution centers. The shrink rate from the most recent physical inventory, in combination with historical experience, is the basis for providing a shrink allowance.

We write down inventory for estimated slow moving inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

Impairment of long-lived assets

We periodically review the estimated useful lives of our depreciable assets and changes in useful lives are made on a prospective basis unless factors indicate the carrying amounts of the assets may not be recoverable and an impairment write-down is necessary. However, we review our long-lived assets for impairment once events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of an asset and its eventual disposition is less than its carrying value. Measurement of an impairment loss for such long-lived assets is based on the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the asset, with fair value being determined based upon discounted cash flows or appraised values, depending on the nature of the asset. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. During fiscal 2017 and 2016, we did not recognize any long-lived asset impairment charges in our consolidated financial statements.

35

##### Table of Contents

Income tax assets

Management judgment is required in determining the valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets and we record valuation allowances when we determine that it is more-likely-than-not that such deferred tax assets will not be realized in the future. We determined that the criteria for recognition of a portion of these assets was met at the reporting date. We have recorded a $53.3 million valuation allowance against the net value of deferred tax assets of $58.6 million as of March 25, 2017 (see Note 10(a) to the consolidated financial statements). This valuation allowance could be reduced in the future based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not that an additional portion of our deferred tax assets will be realized. Additionally, foreign and domestic tax authorities periodically audit our income tax returns. These audits often examine and test the factual and legal basis for positions we have taken in our tax filings with respect to our tax liabilities, including the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions (“tax filing positions”). We believe that our tax filing positions are reasonable and legally supportable. However, in specific cases, various tax authorities may take a contrary position. In evaluating the exposures associated with our various tax filing positions, we record reserves using a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold for income tax positions taken or expected to be taken. Earnings could be affected to the extent we prevail in matters for which reserves have been established or we are required to pay amounts in excess of established reserves.

Inflation

The impact of inflation on our operations has not been significant to date.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 (s) and 2 (t) to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 20-F.

Safe Harbor

See section entitled “Forward-Looking Information” at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

36

##### Table of Contents

Item 6. | Directors, Senior Management and Employees

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

The following table sets forth information about our executive officers and directors, and their respective ages and positions as of May 31, 2017:

Name |  | Age |  |  | Position
Niccolò Rossi di Montelera |  |  | 44 |  |  | Executive Chairman of the Board & Director
Jean-Christophe Bédos |  |  | 52 |  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer & Director
Emily Berlin |  |  | 70 |  |  | Director
Davide Barberis Canonico |  |  | 51 |  |  | Director
Shirley A. Dawe |  |  | 70 |  |  | Director
Frank Di Tomaso |  |  | 70 |  |  | Director
Louis L. Roquet |  |  | 74 |  |  | Director
Joseph F.X Zahra |  |  | 61 |  |  | Director
Albert J. Rahm, II |  |  | 63 |  |  | Executive Vice President, Retail Store Operations
Carlo Coda Nunziante |  |  | 53 |  |  | Vice President, Strategy
Pat Di Lillo |  |  | 55 |  |  | Vice President, Chief Financial & Administrative Officer
Eva Hartling |  |  | 36 |  |  | Vice President, Birks Brand & Chief Marketing Officer
Miranda Melfi |  |  | 53 |  |  | Vice President, Legal Affairs & Corporate Secretary
Hélène Messier |  |  | 57 |  |  | Vice President & Chief Talent Officer
Marco Pasteris |  |  | 56 |  |  | Vice President, Business Development & Support

Directors

Niccolò Rossi di Montelera, age 44, was elected to the Company’s Board of Directors on September 23, 2010 and has served as Vice-Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors from June 2015 until being appointed Executive Chairman of the Board effective January 1, 2017. Mr. Rossi di Montelera’s term as a director of Birks Group expires in 2017. Mr. Rossi di Montelera was a consultant for Gestofi from August 2009 until December 31, 2016 and provided consulting services to the Company in the areas of new product and brand development in addition to being involved with the Company’s business development activities and strategic initiatives. From 2007 to 2009, he served as the Company’s Group Divisional Vice President responsible for product development, wholesale and e-commerce. From 2005 to 2006, he served as the Company’s Group Director responsible for product development. From 2002 to 2003, he worked at Regaluxe Investments SA and was responsible for the North American business development for Royale de Champagne and from 1999 to 2002, he was a Project Leader for Ferrero Group. He was a member of the Supervisory Board of Directors of Montrovest until June 30, 2012. Mr. Rossi di Montelera is the son of Dr. Rossi di Montelera, who was the Company’s Chairman of the Board until December 31, 2016, and is the brother-in-law of Mr. Carlo Coda-Nunziante who is the Company’s Vice President, Strategy.

Jean-Christophe Bédos, age 52, was appointed to the Company’s Board of Directors on April 19, 2012. He was the Company’s Chief Operating Officer from January 2012 to March 2012 and became the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer on April 1, 2012. He became a director of Birks Group on April 19, 2012 and his term as a director expires in 2017. He has over 25 years of experience in merchandising, marketing, branding and product development in the global retail luxury sector. Mr. Bédos was President and Chief Executive Officer of French jeweler Boucheron from May 2004 to September 2011. Prior to that, he was the Managing Director of Cartier France from 2002 to 2004, and International Executive Manager alongside the President and Chief Executive Officer of Richemont International from 2000 to 2002. Mr. Bédos started his career in the jewelry industry at Cartier in 1988.

Emily Berlin, age 70, has been a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since November 2005. Ms. Berlin’s term as a director of Birks Group expires in 2017. She was a member of the board of directors of Mayors from October 2002 until November 14, 2005. She was a Senior Managing Director of Helm Holdings International from 2001 until December 2012, which was a member of a diversified privately owned group of companies operating principally in Central and South America where she focused principally on the banking and energy sectors. Since January 2013, Ms. Berlin has been a strategic consultant to SoEnergy International Inc., an affiliate of Helm Holdings International, operating in the energy sector. From 1974 to 2000, she was a member of the law firm Shearman & Sterling, becoming a partner in 1981.

37

##### Table of Contents

Davide Barberis Canonico, age 51, was elected to the Company’s Board of Directors in September 2013. Mr. Canonico’s term as a director of Birks Group expires in 2017. He was a member of the board of directors of Mayors since November 2005. Since January 1, 2016, Mr. Canonico has been the Chief Executive Officer of Autofil Yarn Ltd., a company in the textile industry supplying yarn to the automotive industry with manufacturing facilities in the United Kingdom and Bulgaria and was the Group Strategy Director from June 2015 to December 2015. From 1998 to March 2016, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Manifattura di Ponzone S.p.A., an Italian family-owned company in the textile industry. From 2001 to 2015, he was also a member of the board of Sinterama S.p.A., a company in the textile industry with manufacturing facilities worldwide. He is a member of the Supervisory Board of Montrovest B.V.

Shirley A. Dawe, age 70, has been a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since 1999. Ms. Dawe’s term as a director of Birks Group expires in 2017. She is also a Corporate Director and has been President of Shirley Dawe Associates Inc., a Toronto-based management advisory company specializing in the retail sector since 1986. From 1969 to 1985, she held progressively senior executive positions with Hudson’s Bay Company. Her expertise in the retail sector led to her appointment on industry-specific public task forces and to academic and not-for-profit boards of directors. Her wide management and consumer marketing experience brought Ms. Dawe to the board of directors of numerous public and private companies in Canada and the U.S.

Frank Di Tomaso, age 70, was elected to the Company’s Board of Directors in September 2014. Mr. Di Tomaso’s term as a director of Birks Group expires in 2017. Mr. Di Tomaso is a corporate director. He has been a Chartered Professional Accountant since 1972. He was an audit and advisory partner at Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP from 1981 to 2012 where he held the position of Managing Partner Audit – Public Companies until he retired in 2012. Mr. Di Tomaso also has been and currently is a member of a number of other public company corporate boards, namely Intertape Polymer Group Inc. and ADF Group Inc.

Louis L. Roquet, age 74, was appointed to the Company’s Board of Directors on May 11, 2016. Mr. Roquet’s term as a director of Birks Group expires in 2017. Mr. Roquet was previously a member of the Company’s Board of Directors from August 2007 to July 2014 before being appointed by the Québec Government to the position of Chairman of the Board of Investissement Québec in July 2014 from which he resigned on May 2, 2016. From 2012 to 2014, Mr. Roquet was Managing Director of Cevital Spa, a large Algerian manufacturer of food products. Mr. Roquet has served as General Manager of the City of Montréal from January 2010 to January 2012. From April 2004 to October 2009, he was President and Chief Operating Officer of Desjardins Venture Capital and was responsible for managing Desjardins’ venture capital funds together with those of Capital Régional and Coopératif Desjardins, a publicly-traded company established in 2001 with an authorized capitalization of $1.0 billion. From 2002 to 2004, Mr. Roquet served as President and General Manager of Société des alcools du Québec (“SAQ”), Québec’s Liquor Board. Prior to 2002 he held the title of President and Chief Executive Officer of Investissement Québec, Secretary General of the City of Montréal and General Manager of Montréal Urban Community. He also serves as a director of numerous non-profit organizations.

Joseph F.X. Zahra, age 61, was appointed to the Company’s Board of Directors on November 9, 2016.Mr. Zahra’s term as a director of Birks Group expires in 2017. Mr. Zahra is a founding partner and director of SurgeAdvisory Limited, an advisory firm which focuses on strategy and transformation management, succession planning and boardroom coaching operating in Malta, since January 1, 2017. Prior thereto, he was a founding partner and managing director of MISCO, an independent consulting group operating in Malta, Cyprus and Italy from 1983 to 2016. Mr. Zahra also serves as director of several private, publicly-listed and regulated companies operating in the following industries: financial services (insurance and investment services), oil services, transportation, retail and hospitality. Mr. Zahra is also chairman of the board of directors of Forestals Investments Ltd. and of Multi Risk Ltd. and chairman of the audit committee of Corinthia Palace Hotel Co. Ltd., Medserv plc and member of the audit committee of United Finance plc. He also serves as chairman of the investment committee of Pendergardens Developments plc and of Multi Risk Indemnity Ltd. and is a member of the investment committee of Chasophie Group Limited. Mr. Zahra was director of the Central Bank of Malta from 1992 to 1996 and served as executive chairman of Bank of Valletta Plc from 1998 to 2004, Maltacom Plc in 2003 and Middlesea Insurance Plc from 2010 to 2012. Mr. Zahra was appointed as one of the five international auditors at the Prefettura per gli Affari Economici of the Holy See from 2010 to 2014 and was the president of the economic and administrative reform commission (COSEA) from 2013 to 2014 as well as the vice coordinator of the newly formed Council for the Economy of the Holy See since 2014.

Other Executive Officers

Albert J. Rahm, II, age 63, is our Executive Vice President, Retail Store Operations and has been with Birks Group since April 2007. Prior to joining us, Mr. Rahm was the President of C.D. Peacock, a jewelry retail in Chicago from March 2006 until April 2007 and prior to that he was Vice President, Retail Store Operations for Mayors since 1991 and for Birks since 2005 until March 2006. Prior to joining Mayors in 1991, Mr. Rahm owned and operated three retail jewelry stores for a fourteen-year period in Shreveport, Louisiana.

38

##### Table of Contents

Carlo Coda Nunziante, age 53, is our Vice President, Strategy and has been with Birks Group since November 18, 2002. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Coda Nunziante was, from 1999 to 2002, a Senior Manager at A.T. Kearney, a leading global full-service management consulting firm with offices in more than 40 countries. Prior thereto, from 1994 to 1998, Mr. Coda Nunziante was Process Reengineering Manager at Whirlpool Corporation, one of the largest appliance manufacturers in the world. Mr. Coda Nunziante is the son-in-law of Dr. Rossi di Montelera, who was a director and the Chairman of the Board of the Company until December 31, 2016. Mr. Coda Nunziante is also the brother-in-law of Niccolò Rossi di Montelera, a director and Executive Chairman of the Board. Mr. Coda Nunziante is also an advisor to Montrovest and a director of Gestofi.

Pasquale (Pat) Di Lillo, age 55, is our Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer and has been with Birks Group since January 2015. Prior to joining us, he was Senior Vice President, and Corporate Controller at SNC-Lavalin Group Inc., one of the world’s largest engineering and construction companies from May 2010 to December 2014 and was Vice-President, Taxation from August 2007 to May 2010. From October 1983 to August 2007, he was with KPMG LLP, where he was appointed a partner in 1995.

Eva Hartling, age 36, is our Vice President, Birks Brand and Chief Marketing Officer. She has been with the Company since August 2010. Prior to her current position, she was our Vice President, Marketing and Communications from November 2013 to January 2017. From August 2010 to November 2013, she was Director, Public Relations. Prior to joining Birks Group, Ms. Hartling, from 2009 to 2010, was with Telefilm Canada and held the position of Senior Advisor, External Communications. From 2007 to 2009, Ms. Hartling was Director, External Communications at Rona Inc., a publicly-traded retailer and distributor of hardware, building materials and home renovation products. From 2002 to 2007, she held various positions in public relations.

Miranda Melfi, age 53, is our Vice President, Legal Affairs and Corporate Secretary and has been with Birks Group since April 2006. Prior to joining us, Ms. Melfi was with Cascades Inc., a publicly-traded pulp and paper company for eight years and held the position of Vice President, Legal Affairs, Boxboard Group. From 1994 to 1998, Ms. Melfi was Vice President, Legal Affairs and Corporate Secretary at Stella-Jones Inc., a publicly-traded wood products company, and from 1991 to 1994, practiced corporate, commercial and securities law with Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP.

Hélène Messier, age 57, is our Vice President & Chief Talent Officer and has been with Birks since November 2000. Prior to joining Birks, she was Assistant General Manager of the Federation des Producteurs de Lait du Québec (Quebec’s Federation of Milk Producers) from November 1997 to November 2000. From 1982 to 1997, she held various management positions both in operations and human resources with Bell Canada.

Marco Pasteris, age 56, is our Vice President, Business Development and Support and has been with Birks since September 1993 in several capacities including Vice President, Finance and Treasurer. Prior to joining Birks Group, Mr. Pasteris was the representative of the Fata S.p.A. of Pianezza, Italy in Sovitalprodmash, Volsk, Russia (a Fata S.p.A. Joint Venture) from 1991 to 1993. Before joining Sovitalprodmash, Mr. Pasteris was Controller of International Operations at the Gruppo Finanziaro Tessile S.p.A., Torino, Italy, where he spent six years.

39

##### Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Director Compensation

During fiscal 2017, each director who was not an employee of the Company received an annual fee of $25,000 for serving on our Board of Directors, $1,500 for each Board meeting attended in person and $750 for each Board meeting attended by phone. The chairperson of each of the audit committee, compensation committee and corporate governance and nominating committee received an additional annual fee of $10,000, $8,000 and $5,000, respectively. The members of each of the audit committee, compensation committee and corporate governance and nominating committee received an additional annual fee of $5,000, $4,000 and $2,500, respectively, and the independent member of the executive committee received an additional annual fee of $4,000. The chairperson and any other members of any special independent committee of directors that may be established from time to time is entitled to receive compensation as may be determined by the Board of Directors for his or her service on such committee. Each director who is not an employee of the Company is entitled to receive deferred stock units equal to a value of $20,000 in September 2017 and $25,000 in September 2018 and every September thereafter. In November 2016, the directors received deferred stock units equal to a value of $10,000. In April 2014 and April 2015, 5,000 stock appreciation rights were granted to each non-employee director. In addition, in September 2014, 2,000 stock appreciation rights were granted to a new member of the Company’s Board of Directors. All directors were reimbursed for reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with the performance of their duties as directors.

On November 15, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the payments of €200,000 (approximately $225,000 in U.S dollars) and €50,000 (approximately $56,300 in U.S dollars) to Mr. Niccolò Rossi di Montelera for his role as Executive Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Executive Committee, respectively, effective January 1, 2017.

Executive Compensation

We are a “foreign private issuer” under U.S. securities laws and not a reporting issuer under Canadian securities laws and are therefore not required to publicly disclose detailed individual information about executive compensation under U.S. securities laws to the extent that we comply with the rules of our home jurisdiction. As such, the executive compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and three other most highly compensated executive officers are detailed in our Management Proxy Circular described below. Under the Canada Business Corporations Act, being the statute under which we were incorporated, we are required to provide certain information on executive compensation. The aggregate compensation paid by us to our nine executive officers in fiscal 2017, including one who left the Company during the year, was approximately $2,131,000 (annual salary).

The summary compensation table regarding our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and three other most highly compensated executive officers and the option/RSU grants and exercise of options/RSU tables in our Management Proxy Circular will be filed on Form 6-K with the SEC in connection with our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

40

##### Table of Contents

Birks Group Incentive Plans

Long-Term Incentive Plan

In 2006, Birks Group adopted a Long-Term Incentive Plan to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional incentive to employees and consultants and to promote the success of Birks Group’s business. As of May 31, 2017, there were 128,000 cash-based stock appreciation rights exercisable by members of the Company’s Board of Directors and outstanding stock options to purchase 650,000 shares of the Company’s Class A voting shares granted to eight members of the Company’s senior management team under the Long-Term Incentive Plan. The stock appreciation rights outstanding as of May 31, 2017, under the Long-Term Incentive Plan, have a weighted average exercise price of $1.33 and the stock options outstanding as of May 31, 2017, under the Long-Term Incentive Plan have a weighted average exercise price of $1.07.

In general, the Long-Term Incentive Plan is administered by Birks Group’s Board of Directors or a committee designated by the Board of Directors (the “Administrator”). Any employee or consultant selected by the Administrator is eligible for any type of award provided for under the Long-Term Incentive Plan, except that incentive stock options may not be granted to consultants. The selection of the grantees and the nature and size of grants and awards are wholly within the discretion of the Administrator. The Long-Term Incentive Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options that qualify under Section 422 of the U.S Internal Revenue Code and non-statutory options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and performance unit or share awards, as such terms are defined in the Long-Term Incentive Plan.

In the event of a change in control of Birks Group, the Administrator, at its sole discretion, may determine that all outstanding awards shall become fully and immediately exercisable and vested. In the event of dissolution or liquidation of Birks Group, the Administrator may, at its sole discretion, declare that any stock option or stock appreciation right shall terminate as of a date fixed by the Administrator and give the grantee the right to exercise such option or stock option right.

In the event of a merger or asset sale or other change in control, as defined by the Long-Term Incentive Plan, the administrator may, in its sole discretion, take any of the following actions or any other action the administrator deems to be fair to the holders of the awards:

• |  | Provide that all outstanding awards upon the consummation of such a merger or sale shall be assumed by, or an equivalent option or right shall be substituted by, the successor corporation or parent or subsidiary of such successor corporation;

• |  | Prior to the occurrence of the change in control, provide that all outstanding awards to the extent they are exercisable and vested shall be terminated in exchange for a cash payment equal to the change in control price; or

• |  | Prior to the occurrence of the change in control, provide for the grantee to have the right to exercise the award as to all or a portion of the covered stock, including, if so determined by the administrator, in its sole discretion, shares as to which it would not otherwise be exercisable.

The Long-Term Incentive Plan authorized the issuance of 900,000 Class A voting shares, which consisted of authorized but unissued Class A voting shares. The Long-term Incentive Plan expired on February 10, 2016 and no further awards will be granted under this plan. However, this plan will remain effective until the outstanding awards issued thereunder terminate or expire by their terms.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In 2006, Birks Group adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), which was approved in September 2006. The ESPP permits eligible employees, which do not include executives of Birks Group Inc., to purchase our Class A voting shares from Birks Group at 85% of their fair market value through regular payroll deductions. A total of 100,000 shares of our Class A voting shares are reserved for issuance under the ESPP. From its inception until February 2009, a total of, 99,995 Class A voting shares were issued under the ESPP and no additional shares will be issued under this plan.

CEO and Senior Executives Long-Term Cash Incentive Plans

During the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013, the Board of Directors approved the long-term cash incentive plans (“LTCIPs”) for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Executive members. The intention of the LTCIPs are to reward the Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior management based on our performance over three-year cycles, the first of which began with the fiscal 2013 through fiscal 2015 period. The approval of a new three-year cycle is at the discretion of the Board of Directors on recommendation of the Compensation committee. The payouts under the LTCIPs will be based on our earnings before tax (“EBT”) performance with the payout level

41

##### Table of Contents

earned during the three-year period either increasing or decreasing based on our EBT performance levels versus thresholds established in each of the three years of the three-year cycle and afterwards, if the LTCIPs are continued. The payout will be 1/3 of the LTCIPs value earned at the end of the first three year cycle and 1/3 of the LTCIPs value for every year thereafter, subject to the Chief Executive Officer and participating executives continued employment and subject to the payment not causing any default on the Company’s credit facilities. The LTCIPs payouts will continue to rise or fall based on the Company’s performance each year. The total LTCIPs pool is only created to compensate if EBT is above a certain growth rate and the payout is capped so that the total three-year costs of the programs combined does not exceed 10% of our total earnings before taxes for the three-year period. As of March 28, 2015 and March 29, 2014, no amounts were earned under the LTCIP and no new three-year cycles have been approved by the Board of Directors. The LTCIPs are no longer applicable to the Chief Executive Officer or any other Senior Executive.

CEO Long-term Cash Incentive Plan

In April 2015, our Board of Directors approved a long-term cash incentive plan for the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO LTCIP”). The intention of the CEO LTCIP is to reward the Chief Executive Officer based on the Company’s performance over three-year cycles, the first of which begins with the fiscal 2016 through fiscal 2018 period. The approval of this three-year cycle is at the discretion of the Board of Directors on recommendation of the Compensation Committee. The CEO LTCIP is structured to fund a pool of dollars based on the successful achievement of earnings before tax (“EBT”) and the level of achievements of three key metrics that can modify the amount achieved based on EBT over three one-year periods. The amount of money funded each year, if earned, is added together at the end of the three-year cycle (with each year comprising 1/3 of the total payout opportunity). Fifty percent (50%) of the final value of the pool following completion of the three year cycle (early fiscal year 2019) is payable at the end of the three year cycle, with the remaining 50% payable one year thereafter (early fiscal 2020) subject to the Chief Executive Officer remaining employed at the time of payout and the payout not causing any default under our senior secured credit facilities. As of March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, no amounts were earned under the CEO LTCIP.

Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan

On August 15, 2016, the Board of Directors adopted the Company’s Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus LTIP”), and same was approved by the Company’s shareholders on September 21, 2016. Under the Omnibus LTIP, the Company’s directors, officers, senior executives and other employees of the Company or one of its subsidiaries, consultants and service providers providing ongoing services to the Company and its affiliates may from time-to-time be granted various types of compensation awards, as same are further described below. The Omnibus LTIP is meant to replace the Company’s former equity awards plans. A total of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Class A voting shares are reserved for issuance under the Omnibus LTIP. In no event shall the Company issue Class A voting shares, or awards requiring the Company to issue Class A voting shares, pursuant to the Omnibus LTIP if such issuance, when combined with the Class A voting shares issuable upon the exercise of awards granted under the Company’s former plan or any other equity awards plan of the Company, would exceed 1,796,088 Class A voting shares, unless such issuance of Class A voting shares or awards is approved by the shareholders of the Company. This limit shall not restrict however, the Company’s ability to issue awards under the Omnibus LTIP that are payable other than in shares. As of May 31, 2017, the only awards outstanding under the Omnibus LTIP were 55,944 deferred stock units granted to members of the Company’s Board of Directors, 121,500 restricted stock units granted to eight members of the Company’s senior management team and 218,000 Class A voting shares underlying options granted to eight members of the Company’s senior management team.

Birks Employee Stock Option Plan

Effective May 1, 1997, Birks adopted an Employee Stock Option Plan (the “Birks ESOP”) designed to attract and retain the services of selected employees or non-employee directors of Birks or its affiliates who are in a position to make a material contribution to the successful operation of our business. The Birks ESOP was amended as of June 20, 2000. Effective as of November 15, 2005, no awards will be granted under the Birks ESOP. However, the Birks ESOP will remain in effect until the outstanding awards thereunder terminate or expire by their terms. As of May 31, 2017, there were 6,162 Class A voting shares underlying options granted under the Birks ESOP at a weighted average exercise price of $1.05 per share.

Mayors Equity-Incentive Plans

1991 Stock Option Plan and Long-Term Incentive Plan

The Company has outstanding employee stock options and SARs issued to employees and members of the Board of Directors of Mayors under the 1991 Stock Option Plan (“the 1991 Plan”) and the Long-Term Incentive Plan (the

42

##### Table of Contents

“Mayor’s LTIP”) approved by the former Board of Directors of Mayors. Under these plans, the option price was required to equal the market price of the stock on the date of the grant or in the case of an individual who owned 10% or more of the common stock of Mayors, the minimum price was to be set at 110% of the market price at the time of issuance. Options granted under these programs generally became exercisable from six months to three years after the date of grant, provided that the individual was continuously employed by Mayors, or in the case of directors, remained on the Board of Directors. All options generally expired no more than ten years after the date of grant. Effective as of November 15, 2005, no further awards will be granted under these plans. However, these plans will remain effective until the outstanding awards issued under the plans terminate or expire by their terms. As of May 31, 2017, there were 627 Class A voting shares underlying awards granted under the 1991 Plan and no outstanding awards under the Mayor’s LTIP, following the Offer to Amend (as described below). The awards outstanding under the 1991 Plan have a weighted average exercise price of $1.05.

Stock Option Amendments

On March 18, 2010, the Company filed with the SEC a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO which included therein an “Offer to Amend Certain Outstanding Options” (the “Offer to Amend”), relating to an offer by the Company to its current employees and subsidiaries’ employees to amend certain of their outstanding options to purchase the Company’s Class A voting shares. Only options granted under the Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Employee Stock Option Plan effective as of May 1, 1997 and amended as of June 20, 2000 and Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc. 1991 Amended Stock Option Plan, with an exercise price per share greater than $4.00 (in the currency in which such option was granted) that remained outstanding as of the expiration of the offer on April 16, 2010, were eligible to be amended in the offer. Pursuant to the Offer to Amend, the Company received, as of April 16, 2010, tendered eligible stock options covering 85,786 shares of its Class A voting shares and provided amended options to purchase up to 12,077 shares of the Company’s Class A voting shares, thereby reducing the number of shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options by 73,709 shares. The amended stock options have exactly the same terms as the eligible stock options, but they are exercisable for a lesser number of Class A voting shares, they have a new exercise price of $1.05 per share, a new ten-year term, and different terms in the event of a change in control, going-private transaction, or a liquidation or dissolution of the Company, as described in the Offer to Amend.

BOARD PRACTICES

Our by-laws state that the Board of Directors will meet immediately following the election of directors at any annual or special meeting of the shareholders and as the directors may from time to time determine. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Articles of Incorporation and By-laws.”

Under our Restated Articles of Incorporation, our directors serve one-year terms although they will continue in office until successors are appointed. None of the members of our Board has service agreements providing for benefits upon termination of employment, except for Mr. Bédos, our President and Chief Executive Officer. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Material Contracts—Employment Agreements.”

Our Board of Directors has determined that five of our eight directors (Emily Berlin, Shirley A. Dawe, Frank Di Tomaso, Louis L. Roquet and Joseph F.X Zahra) qualify as independent directors within the meaning of Section 803A of the NYSE MKT Company Guide.

All of the directors on our Compensation, Corporate Governance and Audit committees are independent. We are a “controlled company” (one in which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, a group or another company) within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE MKT. Accordingly, we are not required under the NYSE MKT rules to have a majority of independent directors, a nominating and corporate governance committee and a compensation committee (each of which, under the NYSE MKT rules, would otherwise be required to be comprised entirely of independent directors). Since November 2005, our Board of Directors has been comprised of a majority of independent directors, except for (i) fiscal year 2013 following the appointment of Mr. Bédos, our President and Chief Executive Officer, as an additional director of the Company, during which period our Board of Directors was comprised of 50% independent directors, (ii) part of fiscal year 2015 following the 2014 annual shareholder meeting where four of the Company’s eight directors qualified as independent directors, (iii) part of fiscal year 2016 following the resignation of Mr. Guthrie J. Stewart in December 2015 until the appointment of Mr. Louis L. Roquet in May 2016, and (iv) part of fiscal year 2017 until the appointment of Mr. Joseph F.X. Zahra, during which period our Board of Directors was comprised of a majority of non-independent directors.

Notwithstanding the fact that we qualify for the “controlled company” exemption, we maintain a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and a Compensation Committee comprised solely of independent directors.

During fiscal 2017, our Board of Directors held a total of six board of directors meetings and twenty-one committee meetings. During such period, all of the directors attended 100% of the meetings of the Board of Directors.

43

##### Table of Contents

Our Board of Directors is supported by committees, which are working groups that analyze issues and provide recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding their respective areas of focus. The executive officers interact periodically with the committees to address management issues. During fiscal 2017, our Board of Directors was composed of the four main committees below. The Board of Directors may from time to time also create special committees of the Board as needed.

1. Audit Committee. We have a separately designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The audit committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The audit committee reviews the scope and results of the annual audit of our consolidated financial statements conducted by our independent auditors, the scope of other services provided by our independent auditors, proposed changes in our financial accounting standards and principles, and our policies and procedures with respect to its internal accounting, auditing and financial controls. The audit committee also examines and considers other matters relating to our financial affairs and accounting methods, including selection and retention of our independent auditors. During fiscal 2017, the audit committee held four meetings. During such period, all the members of the Audit Committee attended 100% of these meetings. During fiscal year 2017, the audit committee was comprised of Frank Di Tomaso (Chair), Emily Berlin, Louis L. Roquet (since May 11, 2016) and Joseph F.X. Zahra (since November 15, 2016), each of whom was financially literate and an independent (as defined by the NYSE MKT listing standards and SEC rules), non-employee director of the Company. We have determined that Frank Di Tomaso is an “audit committee financial expert” as this term is defined under SEC rules. Neither the SEC nor the NYSE MKT requires us to designate an “audit committee financial expert”. A copy of the audit committee charter is available on the Company’s website at www.birksgroup.com.

2. Compensation Committee. We have a standing compensation committee. The compensation committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The purpose of the compensation committee is to recommend to the Board of Directors executive compensation, including base salaries, bonuses and long-term incentive awards for the Chief Executive Officer and certain other executive officers of Birks Group. The compensation committee also establishes criteria for goals and objectives for variable compensation, evaluates the performance of the Chief Executive Officer on an annual basis and provides recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding Chief Executive Officer and senior management succession plans. Certain decisions regarding compensation of certain other executive officers are reviewed by the compensation committee. During fiscal 2017, the compensation committee held four meetings and all of the members of the compensation committee attended these meetings during such period. During fiscal 2017, the compensation committee was comprised of Shirley A. Dawe (Chair), Frank Di Tomaso and Louis L. Roquet (since May 11, 2016). Each member of the compensation committee is an independent (as defined by the NYSE MKT listing standards), non-employee director of the Company.

3. Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The corporate governance and nominating committee is responsible for overseeing all aspects of our corporate governance policies. The corporate governance and nominating committee is also responsible for the oversight and review of all related party transactions and for nominating potential nominees to the Board of Directors. Our policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by a shareholder is that we will consider such candidates and evaluate such candidates by the same process as candidates identified by the corporate governance committee. During fiscal 2017, the corporate governance and nominating committee held four meetings and all members of the corporate governance and nominating committee attended 100% of these meetings during such period. Our corporate governance and nominating committee is comprised of three directors and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. During fiscal 2017 members are Emily Berlin (Chair), Shirley Dawe, and Frank Di Tomaso. Every member of the Corporate Governance Committee is an independent (as defined by the NYSE MKT listing standards), non-employee director of Birks Group.

4. Executive Committee. We have a standing executive committee. The executive committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The purpose of the executive committee is to provide a simplified review and approval process in between meetings of the Board of Directors for certain corporate actions. The intent of the executive committee is to facilitate our efficient operation with guidance and direction from the Board of Directors. The goal is to provide a mechanism that can assist in our operations, including but not limited to, the monitoring of the implementation of policies, strategies and programs. In addition, the executive committee’s mandate is to assist the Board with respect to the development, continuing assessment and execution of the Company’s strategic plan. The executive committee is comprised of at least three members of the Board of Directors. Vacancies on the committee are filled by majority vote of the Board of Directors at the next meeting of the Board of Directors following the occurrence of the vacancy. During fiscal year 2017, the executive committee consisted of: Niccolò Rossi di Montelera (Chair), Jean-Christophe Bédos, Davide Barberis Canonico, Louis L. Roquet (since May 11, 2016) and Joseph F.X. Zahra (since November 15, 2016). For fiscal 2017, the executive committee held nine meetings. All of the members of the executive committee attended these meetings during such

44

##### Table of Contents

period except for one member who attended 89% of the committee meetings while that member was in office and another member who attended 88% of the Committee meetings while that member was in office. Messrs. Roquet and Zahra are independent, non-employee directors of the Company.

EMPLOYEES

As of March 25, 2017, we employed approximately 541 persons. None of our employees are governed by a collective bargaining agreement with a labor union. We believe our relations with our employees are good and we intend to continue to place an emphasis on recruiting, training, retraining and developing the best people in our industry.

Retail employees include only those employees within our retail selling locations, while administration includes all other activities including corporate office, merchandising, supply chain operations and corporate sales. The table below sets forth headcount by category and geographic location for the periods indicated:

|  | Canada |  |  | U.S. |  |  | Total |
As of March 25, 2017: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Administration |  |  | 135 |  |  |  | 28 |  |  |  | 163 |
Retail |  |  | 224 |  |  |  | 154 |  |  |  | 378 |
Total |  |  | 359 |  |  |  | 182 |  |  |  | 541 |
As of March 26, 2016: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Administration |  |  | 144 |  |  |  | 31 |  |  |  | 175 |
Retail |  |  | 231 |  |  |  | 152 |  |  |  | 383 |
Total |  |  | 375 |  |  |  | 183 |  |  |  | 558 |
As of March 28, 2015: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Administration |  |  | 184 |  |  |  | 47 |  |  |  | 231 |
Retail |  |  | 244 |  |  |  | 158 |  |  |  | 402 |
Total |  |  | 428 |  |  |  | 205 |  |  |  | 633 |

45

##### Table of Contents

SHARE OWNERSHIP

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Class A voting shares as of May 31, 2017, based on 10,242,911 Class A voting shares, by each executive officer and each director:

Name of Beneficial Owner |  | Number of Class A Voting Shares Beneficially Owned |  |  | Percentage of Beneficially Owned |
Niccolò Rossi di Montelera |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Jean-Christophe Bédos(1) |  |  | 283,333 |  |  |  | 2.7 | %
Davide Barberis Canonico |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Shirley A. Dawe(2) |  |  | 1,545 |  |  |  |  | *
Emily Berlin(3) |  |  | 46,952 |  |  |  |  | *
Frank Di Tomaso |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Louis L. Roquet |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Joseph F.X. Zahra |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Pat Di Lillo(4) |  |  | 36,666 |  |  |  |  | *
Hélène Messier(5) |  |  | 24,066 |  |  |  |  | *
Marco Pasteris(6) |  |  | 204,486 |  |  |  | 2.0 | %
Albert J. Rahm, II(7) |  |  | 21,666 |  |  |  |  | *

* | Less than 1%.

(1) | Includes (A) an option to purchase 150,000 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2017, at a price of $1.04 per share and which expires on January 4, 2022, and; (B) an option to purchase 100,000 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2017, at a price of $0.84 per share and which expires on April 18, 2023. An option to purchase 100,000 Class A voting shares, of which 33,333 shares are exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2017, at a price of $0.78 per share and which expires on September 16, 2025, are included in the table above. An option to purchase 100,000 Class A voting shares vesting over a period of three (3) years from November 15, 2016, exercisable at a price of $1.43 per share and which expires on November 15, 2016, has not been included as the option is not vested.

(2) | Includes 1,545 Class A voting shares.

(3) | Includes 46,952 Class A voting shares.

(4) | Includes an option to purchase 50,000 Class A shares, exercisable at a price of $1.94 per share expiring on January 5, 2025, which vests over a period of three (3) years from January 5, 2015, and currently 33,333 are vested and exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2017, are included in the table above. An option to purchase 10,000 Class A shares vesting over a period of three (3) years from September 16, 2015, exercisable at a price of $0.78 per share expiring on September 16, 2025, and currently 3,333 are vested and exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2017, are included in the table above. An option to purchase 26,000 Class A shares vesting over a period of three (3) years from November 15, 2016, exercisable at a price of $1.43 per share and expiring on November 15, 2026, has not been included as the option is not vested.

(5) | Includes (a) an option to purchase 2,400 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2017, at a price of $1.05 per share expiring on April 16, 2020, and (b) an option to purchase 15,000 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2017, at a price of $0.89 per share expiring on November 14, 2022. An option to purchase 20,000 Class A voting at a price of $0.78 per share and which expires on September 16, 2025, of which 6,666 shares are exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2017, are included in the table above. An option to purchase 14,000 Class A voting shares vesting over a period of three (3) years from November 15, 2016, exercisable at a price of $1.43 per share and expiring on November 15, 2026, has not been included as the option is not vested.

(6) | Includes (a) an option to purchase 2,170 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2017, at a price of $1.05 per share expiring on April 16, 2020, (b) an option to purchase 15,000 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2017, at a price of $1.25 per share expiring on September 23, 2020, (c) warrants to purchase 48,110 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2017, at prices of $3.34 to $6.21 per share expiring on August 20, 2022, (d) an option to purchase 10,000 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2017, at a price of $0.89 per share expiring on November 14, 2022, (e) an option to purchase 15,000 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2017 at a price of $1.66 per share expiring on September 12, 2023, (f) 107,540 Class A voting shares. An option to purchase 20,000 Class A voting shares exercisable at a price of $0.78 per share and which expires on September 16, 2025, of which 6,666 shares are exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2017, are included in the table above. An option to purchase 15,000 Class A voting shares vesting over a period of three (3) years from November 15, 2016, exercisable at a price of $1.43 per share and expiring on November 15, 2026, has not been included as the option is not vested.

(7) | Includes (a) an option to purchase 15,000 Class A voting shares, currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2017, at a price of $0.89 per share and which expires on November 14, 2022, (b) an option to purchase 20,000 Class A voting shares vesting over a period of three (3) years from September 16, 2015, exercisable at a price of $0.78 per share and which expires on September 16, 2025, and currently 6,666 are vested and exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2017 and included in the table above. An option to purchase 25,000 Class A shares vesting over a period of three (3) years from November 15, 2016, exercisable at a price of $1.43 per share and which expires on November 15, 2026, has not been included as the option is not vested.

For arrangements involving the issuance or grant of options or shares of the Company to such named executive officers and other employees, see above under the heading “Compensation of Directors and Officers” and Item 10. “Additional Information—Material Contracts—Employment Agreements.”

46

##### Table of Contents

Item 7. | Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Class A voting shares as of May 31, 2017 by each person or entity who beneficially owns 5% or more of outstanding voting securities, including the Class A voting shares and Class B multiple voting shares. The major shareholders listed with Class B multiple voting shares are entitled to ten votes for each Class B multiple voting share held, whereas holders of Class A voting shares are entitled to one vote per Class A voting share held. Unless otherwise indicated in the table, each of the individuals named below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the voting shares beneficially owned by them. The calculation of the percentage of outstanding shares is based on 10,242,911 Class A voting shares and 7,717,970 Class B multiple voting shares outstanding on May 31, 2017, adjusted where appropriate, for shares of stock beneficially owned but not yet issued.

Beneficial ownership is determined under rules issued by the SEC. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes any of the Class A voting shares or Class B multiple voting shares as to which the individual or entity has sole or shared voting power or investment power and includes any shares as to which the individual or entity has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days through the exercise of any warrant, stock option or other right. The inclusion in this Annual Report of such voting shares, however, does not constitute an admission that the named individual is a direct or indirect beneficial owner of such voting shares. The voting shares that a person has the right to acquire within 60 days of May 31, 2017 are deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of such person, but are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage owned by any other person listed. For information regarding entities or persons that directly or indirectly control us, see “Item 3. Key Information – Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Company.”

Name of Beneficial Owner(1) |  | Number of Class A Voting Shares Beneficially Owned |  |  | Percentage of Beneficially Owned |
Grande Rousse Trust(2) |  |  | 13,646,692 |  |  |  | 76.0 | %
Rohan Private Trust Company Limited(3) |  |  | 13,646,692 |  |  |  | 76.0 | %
Montrovest B.V.(4) |  |  | 8,846,692 |  |  |  | 49.3 | %
Mangrove Holding S.A.(5) |  |  | 4,800,000 |  |  |  | 26.7 | %

(1) | Unless otherwise noted, each person has sole voting and investment power over the shares listed opposite his or her name.

(2) | Includes 13,646,692 Class A voting shares, of which 7,717,970 Class A voting shares to which Montrovest and Mangrove collectively would be entitled upon conversion of the Class B multiple voting shares held by Montrovest and Mangrove, collectively. The Class B multiple voting shares entitle the holder to ten votes for each Class B multiple voting share held and each Class B multiple voting share is convertible into one Class A voting share. The shares held by Montrovest and Mangrove collectively are beneficially owned by Grande Rousse Trust.

(3) | Trustee of Grande Rousse Trust. Includes 13,646,692 Class A voting shares, of which 7,717,970 Class A voting shares to which Montrovest and Mangrove collectively would be entitled upon conversion of the Class B multiple voting shares held by Montrovest and Mangrove, collectively. The Class B multiple voting shares entitle the holder to ten votes for each Class B multiple voting share held and each Class B multiple voting share is convertible into one Class A voting share. The shares held by Montrovest and Mangrove are beneficially owned by Grande Rousse Trust.

(4) | Comprised of 8,846,692 Class A voting shares, of which 3,717,970 Class A voting shares to which Montrovest would be entitled upon conversion of the Class B multiple voting shares held by Montrovest. The Class B multiple voting shares entitle the holder to ten votes for each Class B multiple voting share held and each Class B multiple voting share is convertible into one Class A voting share.

(5) | Includes 4,800,000 Class A voting shares, of which 4,000,000 Class A voting shares to which Mangrove would be entitled upon conversion of the Class B multiple voting shares held by Mangrove. The Class B multiple voting shares entitle the holder to ten votes for each Class B multiple voting shares held and each Class B multiple voting share is convertible into one Class A voting share. Grande Rousse Trust is the sole shareholder of Mangrove.

As of May 31, 2017, there were a total of 269 holders of record of our Class A voting shares, of which 206 were registered with addresses in the United States. Such United States record holders were, as of such date, the holders of record of approximately 74.7% of our outstanding Class A voting shares. The number of record holders in the United States is not representative of the number of beneficial holders nor is it representative of where such beneficial holders are resident since many of these ordinary shares were held of record by brokers or other nominees. None of our Class B multiple voting shares are held in the United States. Each Class B multiple voting share entitles the holder to ten (10) votes at all meetings of our shareholders (except meetings at which only holders of another specified class of shares are entitled to vote pursuant to the provisions of our restated articles or the Canada Business Corporations Act).

47

##### Table of Contents

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Diamond Supply Agreement

On August 15, 2002, Birks entered into a Diamond Inventory Supply Agreement with Prime Investments S.A. and a series of conditional sale agreements with companies affiliated with Prime Investments S.A. pursuant to which Prime Investments S.A., a related party, is entitled to supply Birks and its subsidiaries or affiliates with at least 45%, on an annualized cost basis, of such company’s aggregate loose diamond requirements, conditional upon the prices remaining competitive relative to market and needs in terms of quality, cut standards and specifications being satisfied. During fiscal 2017, Birks did not purchase any diamonds from Prime Investments S.A. and related parties. Asiya Trust, as a trustee of Beech Settlement Trust, as the ultimate beneficial owner of Prime Investments S.A., beneficially owned 15% of the Company’s Class A Voting Shares until of its disposition of its outstanding Class A voting shares to third parties in September 2016.

Management Consulting Services Agreement

In June 2011, we entered into a management consulting services agreement with Montrovest. Under the agreement, we paid Montrovest an annual retainer fee of €140,000 ($152,000 in U.S. dollars) in exchange for services related to the raising of capital for international expansion projects and such other services relating to merchandising and/or marketing of our products as we may request. The agreement was in effect until June 2012 and was extended automatically for successive terms of one year unless either party gave a 60 day notice of its intention not to renew. The yearly renewal of the agreement was subject to the review and approval of our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors. Mr. Davide Barberis Canonico, one of our directors, is a member of the Supervisory Board of Directors of Montrovest and Mr. Carlo Coda-Nunziante, our Vice President, Strategy was a managing director of Montrovest until June 30, 2012. In fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, we paid nil, €105,000 and €140,000 respectively (approximately $116,000 and $178,000, respectively, in U.S. dollars) under this agreement to Montrovest. In April 2015, the agreement was renewed for an additional one year period ending June 8, 2016. Our Board of Directors approved our entering into the agreement and its renewal with Montrovest in accordance with our Code of Conduct relating to related party transactions. In February 2015, our Board of Directors approved the reimbursement to Montrovest of legal fees incurred by Montrovest in connection with the issuance of the $5.0 million LC for our benefit up to a total amount of CAD$75,000 (approximately $60,000 in U.S. dollars). On November 17, 2015, our Board of Directors approved the termination of the management consulting services agreement with Montrovest effective December 31, 2015 and entering into the management consulting services agreement with Gestofi S.A. (“Gestofi”) effective January 1, 2016 on the same terms and conditions as the agreement with Montrovest, all in accordance with our Code of Conduct relating to related party transactions. In fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, we paid €140,000 and €35,000 (approximately $154,000 and $39,000 in U.S. dollars) under this agreement to Gestofi.

Cash Advance Agreements

In February 2009 and May 2009, we received $2.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively, in the form of cash advances from our controlling shareholder, Montrovest, to finance our working capital needs and for general corporate purposes. These advances and any interest thereon are subordinated to the indebtedness of our existing senior credit facilities and secured term loans and were convertible into a convertible debenture or Class A voting shares in the event of a private placement or, are repayable upon demand by Montrovest subject to the conditions stipulated in our senior credit facilities. These cash advances bore interest at an annual rate of 16%, net of any withholding taxes, representing an effective interest rate of approximately 17.8%. If converted into convertible debentures or Class A voting shares, a fee of 7% of the outstanding principal amount of the cash advance would have been paid to Montrovest. In June 2011, the cash advance agreements were amended and restated reducing the annual interest rate to 11%, net of any withholding taxes, representing an effective interest rate of approximately 12.2%, removing the requirement to pay a 7% fee to Montrovest upon conversion into convertible debentures or Class A voting shares and eliminating the convertibility of the cash advance into a convertible debenture or Class A voting shares in the event of a private placement. We also amended the management subordination agreement with Montrovest and our senior lenders, eliminating the payment of any success fee to Montrovest if we received net cash proceeds of $5 million or more related to an equity issuance. In addition, the amended and restated cash advance agreements required a one-time payment of an amendment fee of $75,000 in fiscal 2012. In August 2012, we repaid $3.5 million of these cash advances from the proceeds of our stock rights offering. As of March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, advances payable to the Company’s controlling shareholder, Montrovest, amounted to $1.5 million.

Consulting Services Agreement

On June 30, 2009, our Company’s Board of Directors approved our Company entering into a consulting services agreement with Gestofi in accordance with our Company’s Code of Conduct relating to related party transactions. Under the agreement, Gestofi undertook to assign Mr. Niccolò Rossi di Montelera as the employee of Gestofi responsible for providing the consulting services. The consulting services relate to providing advice and assistance in (i) new product development and product brand collection assortment, (ii) strategic and business development projects and financial matters, (iii) the implementation of the Company’s strategy and planning, and (iv) such other services reasonably requested by our Chief Executive Officer or Chairman (collectively, the “Consulting Services”). The initial one-year term of the agreement began on August 1, 2009 and the agreement may be renewed for additional one-year terms. The agreement has been renewed yearly. The Consulting Services prior to

48

##### Table of Contents

June 2014, were provided to us for a fee of approximately CAD$13,700 ($10,324 in U.S. dollars) per month less any applicable taxes plus out of pocket expenses. In June 2014, upon the renewal of the agreement for an additional one-year term, the monthly fee changed to 13,000 Swiss francs ($13,310 in U.S. dollars). On August 1, 2015, an amended and restated consulting agreement was entered into on substantially the same terms and conditions until July 31, 2016. In June 2016, the agreement was renewed for an additional one-year term. In addition, in February 2015, our Board of Directors approved the payment of an annual fee of $12,500 to Gestofi for services it provided in connection with the issuance of the Montrovest LC for our benefit. The agreement as it relates to the Consulting Services provided by Mr. Niccolò Rossi di Montelera was terminated effective December 31, 2016. Mr. Niccolò Rossi di Montelera is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors and is the son of Dr. Rossi di Montelera, the Company’s former Chairman and a director and chairman of the board of Gestofi.

Reimbursement Letter Agreement

In accordance with our Company’s Code of Conduct related to related party transactions, in April 2011, our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and Board of Directors approved the reimbursement to Regaluxe S.r.l. of expenses, such as rent, communication, administrative support and analytical service costs, incurred in supporting the office of Dr. Lorenzo Rossi di Montelera, our former Chairman, and of Mr. Niccolò Rossi di Montelera, the former Chairman of our Executive Committee and our current Executive Chairman, for work performed on behalf of the Company, up to a yearly maximum of $260,000. This agreement has been renewed yearly and was renewed in March 2017 for an additional one year term. During fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015 we paid $182,000, $201,000, and $241,000 respectively, to Regaluxe S.r.l. under this agreement.

Distribution Agreement

In April 2011, our corporate governance and nominating committee and Board of Directors approved the Company’s entering in a Wholesale and Distribution Agreement with Regaluxe Srl. Under the agreement, Regaluxe Srl is to provide services to the Company to support the distribution of the Company’s products in Italy through authorized dealers. The initial one-year term of the agreement began on April 1, 2011. Under this agreement, the Company pays Regaluxe Srl a net price for the Company’s products equivalent to the price, net of taxes, for the products paid by retailers to Regaluxe Srl less a discount factor of 3.5%. The agreement’s initial term was until March 31, 2012, and may be renewed by mutual agreement for additional one year terms. This agreement has been renewed annually and in March 2017, the agreement was renewed for an additional one-year term. During fiscal year 2017, the Company did not make any payments to Regaluxe Srl under this agreement.

Advisory Consulting Services Agreement

On November 15, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a consulting services agreement with Gestofi effective January 1, 2017. Under the agreement, Dr. Lorenzo Rossi di Montelera is providing advice and assistance on strategic and development projects and financial matters for a total fee of $50,000 during a period ending in September 2017. In fiscal 2017, the Company paid $16,666 in relation to this agreement.

Item 8. | Financial Information

Consolidated Financial Statements

See Item 18. “Financial Statements.”

Dividend Policy

For a discussion of our dividend policy, see Item 3. “Key Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy.”

Legal Proceedings

We are from time to time involved in litigation incident to the conduct of our business. Although such litigation is normally routine and incidental, it is possible that future litigation can result in large monetary awards for compensatory or punitive damages. We believe that no litigation that is currently pending or threatened will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

Significant Changes

No significant changes have occurred since the date of the annual financial statements included in this Annual Report.

49

##### Table of Contents

Item 9. | The Offer and Listing

TRADING MARKET

Effective November 15, 2005, our Class A voting shares were listed and began to trade on the NYSE MKT and are currently trading under the symbol “BGI.” The following table sets forth, for all recently completed full financial years since we began trading on the NYSE MKT, the reported high and low sale prices for the Class A voting shares:

Birks Group Inc. Highest/Lowest Stock Price for the Five Most Recent Full Financial Years |
Fiscal year |  | Highest |  |  | Lowest |
2017 |  | $ | 5.15 |  |  | $ | 0.35 |
2016 |  | $ | 1.40 |  |  | $ | 0.19 |
2015 |  | $ | 2.15 |  |  | $ | 0.81 |
2014 |  | $ | 2.50 |  |  | $ | 0.68 |
2013 |  | $ | 1.19 |  |  | $ | 0.72 |
2012 |  | $ | 1.71 |  |  | $ | 0.90 |
2011 |  | $ | 6.20 |  |  | $ | 0.70 |

The following table sets forth, for each of the most recent six months, the reported high and low sale prices for the Class A voting shares:

Birks Group Inc. Highest/Lowest Stock Price for the Most Recent Six Months |
Month |  | Highest |  |  | Lowest |
June 2017 (through June 14, 2017) |  | $ | 1.74 |  |  | $ | 1.20 |
May 2017 |  | $ | 1.66 |  |  | $ | 1.25 |
April 2017 |  | $ | 1.66 |  |  | $ | 1.24 |
March 2017 |  | $ | 1.79 |  |  | $ | 1.23 |
February 2017 |  | $ | 1.89 |  |  | $ | 1.36 |
January 2017 |  | $ | 2.12 |  |  | $ | 1.05 |
December 2016 |  | $ | 1.30 |  |  | $ | 1.01 |

The following table sets forth, for each quarter in fiscal 2017 and 2016 and any subsequent period, the reported high and low sale prices for the Class A voting shares:

Birks Group Inc. Highest/Lowest Stock Price for Each Quarter in fiscal 2017 and 2016 and Any Subsequent Period |
Subsequent Period |  | Highest |  |  | Lowest |
Quarter ended June 24, 2017 (through June 14, 2017) |  | $ | 1.74 |  |  | $ | 1.20 |
Fiscal 2017 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Quarter ended March 25, 2017 |  | $ | 2.12 |  |  | $ | 1.02 |
Quarter ended December 24, 2016 |  | $ | 2.20 |  |  | $ | 1.00 |
Quarter ended September 24, 2016 |  | $ | 5.15 |  |  | $ | 0.43 |
Quarter ended June 25, 2016 |  | $ | 0.53 |  |  | $ | 0.35 |
Fiscal 2016 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Quarter ended March 26, 2016 |  | $ | 0.48 |  |  | $ | 0.19 |
Quarter ended December 26, 2015 |  | $ | 0.89 |  |  | $ | 0.36 |
Quarter ended September 26, 2015 |  | $ | 1.40 |  |  | $ | 0.67 |
Quarter ended June 27, 2015 |  | $ | 1.40 |  |  | $ | 1.00 |

50

##### Table of Contents

Item 10. | Additional Information

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS

Our Restated Articles of Incorporation do not restrict the type of business that we may carry on. A copy of our Restated Articles of Incorporation were set out in the F-4 registration statement (File No. 333-126936) that was filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005 and subsequently amended on September 8, 2005, September 21, 2005 and September 29, 2005, and which we incorporate by reference. A copy of our By-law No. One is contained as an exhibit to the Form 20-F that we filed with the SEC on July 3, 2012, and which we incorporate by reference. Additionally, certain rights of our shareholders pursuant to our Restated Articles of Incorporation, our By-laws and the Canada Business Corporations Act were set out in the F-4 registration statement (File No. 333-126936) that was filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005, and which we incorporate by reference herein and we refer you to the headings therein entitled “Description of Birks Capital Stock” and “Comparison of Stockholder Rights.”

On April 19, 2012, our Board of Directors approved an amendment to our By-laws to, among other things, add the title and description of the Vice Chairman position, revise the declaration of dividends section of the By-laws, and add a banking and borrowing arrangements section to the bylaws. Under Canadian law, the amendment to our By laws had to be ratified by the shareholders of the Company. At our 2012 Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders ratified the amendment to our By-laws.

On September 12, 2013, at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders approved articles of amendment to our Restated Articles of Incorporation to change our corporate name to Birks Group Inc. A copy of the articles of amendment is filed with our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 25, 2014.

On September 24, 2014, at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders approved articles of amendment to our Restated Articles of Incorporation to allow our board of directors, at any time and from time to time, to issue preferred shares for an aggregate consideration to be received by the Company of up to five million Canadian dollars (CAD$5,000,000) which shall be subject to a 5% dividend limitation as contained in the Restated Articles of Incorporation. A copy of the articles of amendment is filed with our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on June 26, 2015.

51

##### Table of Contents

MATERIAL CONTRACTS

We have not entered into any material contract other than in the ordinary course of business and other than those described below or in Items 4, 5, 7 and 19 of this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

Employment Agreements

Jean-Christophe Bédos

On January 4, 2012, we entered into an employment agreement, or the “Agreement”, with Jean-Christophe Bédos, who succeeded Thomas A. Andruskevich as the President & Chief Executive Officer effective April 1, 2012, and prior to that was our Chief Operating Officer. The Agreement provides Mr. Bédos with a base salary of CAD$700,000 ($561,572 in U.S. dollars based on foreign exchange rates as of May 31, 2015), an annual cash bonus set at a minimum of CAD$282,500 ($226,635 in U.S. dollars based on foreign exchange rates as of May 31, 2015) for fiscal year ended March 30, 2013, of which CAD$141,250 ($136,738 in U.S. dollars based on foreign exchange rates as of May 31, 2012) was paid during fiscal 2012 and CAD$141,250 ($130,184 in U.S. dollars based on foreign exchange rates as of May 31, 2014) was paid in fiscal 2014, an annual target cash bonus of 85% of base salary based on achievement of a targeted level of performance and performance criteria set by the Company, an option to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company’s Class A voting shares which vested over three years and other health and retirement benefits. Effective October 1, 2015, Mr. Bédos’ base salary was increased to CAD$730,000 ($557,209 in U.S. dollars based on foreign exchange rates as of May 31, 2016). Effective November 1, 2016, Mr. Bédos’ base salary was increased to CAD$750,000 ($560,831 in U.S. dollars). If Mr. Bédos is terminated without “cause” or resigns for “good reason,” as these terms are defined in the Agreement, the Agreement provides that Mr. Bédos will receive (i) any earned and accrued but unpaid base salary, (ii) up to 12 months of salary in lieu of further salary or severance payments, (iii) certain health benefits for up to twelve months, and (iv) his bonus through the date of termination. Mr. Bédos is prohibited from competing with us during his employment and for a period of twelve-months thereafter.

EXCHANGE CONTROLS

There are currently no laws, decrees, regulations or other legislation in Canada that restricts the export or import of capital or that affects the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of our securities other than withholding tax requirements. There is no limitation imposed by Canadian law or by our Restated Articles of Incorporation or our other organizational documents on the right of a non-resident of Canada to hold or vote our Class A voting shares, other than as provided in the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Canada) and in the Investment Canada Act, as amended by the World Trade Organization Agreement Implementation Act.

The Investment Canada Act requires notification and, in certain cases, advance review and approval by the Government of Canada of the acquisition by a “non-Canadian” of “control of a Canadian business”, all as defined in the Investment Canada Act. Generally, the threshold for review will be higher in monetary terms, and in certain cases an exemption will apply, for an investor ultimately controlled by persons who are nationals of a WTO Member or have the right of permanent residence in relation thereto.

52

##### Table of Contents

TAXATION

MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF OWNING AND DISPOSING OF BIRKS CLASS A VOTING SHARES

The following discussion is based on the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), applicable Treasury regulations, administrative rulings and pronouncements and judicial decisions currently in effect, all of which could change. Any change, which may be retroactive, could result in U.S. federal income tax consequences different from those discussed below. The discussion is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service, and there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service will not disagree with or challenge any of the conclusions described below.

Except where specifically noted, the discussion below does not address the effects of any state, local or non-U.S. tax laws (or other tax consequences such as estate or gift tax consequences). The discussion below relates to persons who hold Birks Group Class A voting shares as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code. The tax treatment of those persons may vary depending upon the holder’s particular situation, and some holders may be subject to special rules not discussed below. Those holders would include, for example:

| • |  | banks, insurance companies, trustees and mutual funds;

| • |  | tax-exempt organizations;

| • |  | financial institutions;

| • |  | pass-through entities and investors in pass-through entities;

| • |  | traders in securities who elect to apply a mark-to-market method of accounting;

| • |  | broker-dealers;

| • |  | holders who are not U.S. Holders (as defined below);

| • |  | persons whose “functional currency” is not the U.S. dollar;

| • |  | holders who are subject to the alternative minimum tax; and

| • |  | holders of Birks Group Class A voting shares who own 5% or more of either the total voting power or the total value of the outstanding Class A voting shares of Birks Group.

Holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership of Birks Group Class A voting shares in light of their particular situations, as well as any consequences arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.

As used in this document, the term “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial holder of Birks Group Class A voting shares that is (1) an individual who is a U.S. citizen or U.S. resident alien, (2) a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the U.S. or any political subdivision of the U.S., (3) an estate which is subject to U.S. federal income tax on its worldwide income regardless of its source or (4) a trust (x) that is subject to primary supervision of a court within the U.S. and the control of one or more U.S. persons as described in section 7701(a)(30) of the Code or (y) that has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

If a partnership holds Birks Group Class A voting shares, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partners of partnerships that hold Birks Group Class A voting shares should consult their tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences to them.

Dividends and Distributions

Subject to the passive foreign investment company (PFIC) rules discussed below, the gross amount of dividends paid to U.S. Holders of our Class A voting shares, including amounts withheld to reflect Canadian withholding taxes, will be treated as dividend income to these U.S. Holders, to the extent paid out of current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. This income will be includable in the gross income of a U.S. Holder on the day actually or constructively received by the U.S. Holder. Dividends generally will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations upon the receipt of dividends distributed by U.S. corporations.

53

##### Table of Contents

Subject to certain conditions and limitations, Canadian withholding taxes on dividends may be treated as foreign taxes eligible for credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. For purposes of calculating the foreign tax credit, dividends paid on our Class A voting shares will be treated as income from sources outside the U.S. and generally will constitute “passive income.” Special rules apply to certain individuals whose foreign source income during the taxable year consists entirely of “qualified passive income” and whose creditable foreign taxes paid or accrued during the taxable year do not exceed $300 ($600 in the case of a joint return). U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors to determine their eligibility to use foreign tax credits.

To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits for a taxable year, the distribution first will be treated as a tax-free return of capital, causing a reduction in the adjusted basis of our Class A voting shares (thereby increasing the amount of gain, or decreasing the amount of loss, to be recognized by the U.S. Holder on a subsequent disposition of the Class A voting shares), and the balance in excess of adjusted basis will be taxed as capital gain recognized on a sale or exchange.

With respect to certain U.S. Holders who are not corporations, including individuals, certain dividends received from a qualified foreign corporation may be subject to reduced rates of taxation. A “qualified foreign corporation” includes a foreign corporation that is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States which the U.S. Treasury determines to be satisfactory for these purposes and which includes an exchange of information program. U.S. Treasury guidance indicates that the current income tax treaty between Canada and the U.S. meets these requirements, and we believe we are eligible for the benefits of that treaty. In addition, a foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends received from that corporation on shares that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the U.S. Our Class A voting shares, which are listed on the NYSE MKT, should be considered readily tradable on an established securities market in the U.S. Individuals that do not meet a minimum holding period requirement during which they are not protected from the risk of loss or that elect to treat the dividend income as “investment income” pursuant to Section 163(d)(4) of the Code will not be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation regardless of the trading status of our Class A voting shares. In addition, the rate reduction will not apply to dividends if the recipient of a dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. This disallowance applies even if the minimum holding period has been met. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of these rules given their particular circumstances. The rules governing the foreign tax credit are complex. Certain U.S. Holders of our Class A voting shares may not be able to claim a foreign tax credit with respect to amounts withheld for Canadian withholding taxes. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under their particular circumstances.

Sale or Exchange of Class A Voting Shares

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, subject to the rules relating to PFICs described below, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize taxable gain or loss on any sale or exchange of our Class A voting shares in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized for our Class A voting shares and the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in such shares. This gain or loss will be capital gain or loss and generally will be treated as U.S. source gain or loss. Long-term capital gains recognized by certain U.S. Holders who are not corporations, including individuals, generally will be subject to a maximum rate of U.S. federal income tax of currently 23.8%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare surtax imposed by Section 1411 of the Code. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.

Passive Foreign Investment Company

We believe that our Class A voting shares should not be treated as stock of a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and we expect to continue our operations in such a manner that we will not be a PFIC. In general, a company is considered a PFIC for any taxable year if either (i) at least 75% of its gross income is passive income or (ii) at least 50% of the value of its assets is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. The 50% of value test is based on the average of the value of our assets for each quarter during the taxable year. If we own at least 25% by value of another company’s stock, we will be treated, for purposes of the PFIC rules, as owning our proportionate share of the assets and receiving our proportionate share of income of the other company. Based on the nature of our income, assets and activities, and the manner in which we plan to operate our business in future years, we do not expect that we will be classified as a PFIC for any taxable year.

If, however, we are or become a PFIC, U.S. Holders could be subject to additional U.S. federal income taxes on gain recognized with respect to our Class A voting shares and on certain distributions, plus an interest charge on certain taxes treated as having been deferred by the U.S. Holder under the PFIC rules.

54

##### Table of Contents

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

In general, information reporting requirements will apply to dividends in respect of our Class A voting shares or the proceeds received on the sale, exchange, or redemption of our Class A voting shares paid within the United States (and in certain cases, outside of the U.S.) to U.S. Holders other than certain exempt recipients (such as corporations), and a 28% backup withholding tax may apply to these amounts if the U.S. Holder fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number, to report dividends required to be shown on its U.S. federal income tax returns or, in certain circumstances, to comply with applicable certification requirements. The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a U.S. Holder will be allowed as a refund or credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the required information or appropriate claim for refund is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service in a timely manner.

Certain Information Reporting Obligations

Certain U.S. Holders are required to report their ownership of specified foreign financial assets, including stock or securities issued by non-U.S. entities, subject to exceptions, by including a completed IRS Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets, with their tax return for each year in which they own such assets. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding information reporting requirements relating to the ownership of Class A voting shares.

MATERIAL CANADIAN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR CLASS A VOTING SHARES

The following discussion is a summary of the material Canadian federal income tax considerations under the Income Tax Act (Canada) and the regulations adopted thereunder (referred to in this Form 20-F as the “Canadian Tax Act”) of the ownership of our Class A voting shares, generally applicable to holders of our Class A voting shares who, for purposes of the Canadian Tax Act and at all relevant times, are not (and are not deemed to be) resident in Canada, are the beneficial owners of our Class A voting shares, hold our Class A voting shares as capital property, deal at arm’s length, and are not affiliated, with Birks Group, and who do not use or hold (and are not deemed to use or hold) Class A voting shares in connection with carrying on business or part of a business in Canada (referred to in this Form 20-F as “Non-resident Holders”). This discussion does not apply to Non-resident Holders that are insurers that carry on an insurance business in Canada and elsewhere or an “authorized foreign bank” (as defined under the Canadian Tax Act).

This summary is based upon the current provisions of the Canadian Tax Act, the current provisions of the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (1980), as amended, if applicable (referred to in this Form 20-F as the “Convention”), all specific proposals to amend the Canadian Tax Act publicly announced by the Minister of Finance of Canada prior to the date hereof (referred to in this Form 20-F as the “Tax Proposals”) and the current published administrative and assessing practices of the Canada Revenue Agency. This summary assumes that the Tax Proposals will be enacted substantially as proposed and does not otherwise take into account or anticipate any change in law or administrative and assessing practices, whether by legislative, governmental or judicial action, although no assurance can be given in these respects. This summary does not take into account or consider any provincial, territorial or foreign income tax legislation or considerations. For purposes of the Canadian Tax Act, all amounts relevant in computing a Non-resident Holder’s liability under the Canadian Tax Act must be computed in Canadian dollars. Amounts denominated in a currency other than Canadian dollars (including adjusted cost base and proceeds of disposition) must be converted into Canadian dollars based on the prevailing exchange rate at the relevant time.

This summary is of a general nature only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to Non-resident Holders of our Class A voting shares. Accordingly, Non-resident Holders of our Class A voting shares should consult their own tax advisors with respect to their particular circumstances.

Dividends on Our Class A Voting Shares

Dividends paid or credited (or deemed to have been paid or credited) on our Class A voting shares to a Non-resident Holder will be subject to Canadian withholding tax of 25% of the gross amount of those dividends (subject to reduction in accordance with an applicable income tax convention between Canada and the Non-resident Holder’s country of residence). In the case of a Non-resident Holder who is a resident of the U.S. for purposes of the Convention, is entitled to the benefits of the Convention (referred to in this Form 20-F as a “U.S. Holder”) and is the beneficial owner of the dividend, the rate of withholding tax will generally be reduced to 15% or, if the Non-resident Holder is a corporation that owns at least 10% of our voting shares, to 5%.

55

##### Table of Contents

Disposition of Our Class A Voting Shares

A Non-resident Holder will not be subject to tax under the Canadian Tax Act in respect of any capital gain realized by that Non-resident Holder on a disposition (or deemed disposition) of a Class A voting share, unless the Class A voting share constitutes “taxable Canadian property” (as defined in the Canadian Tax Act) of the Non-resident Holder at the time of disposition and the Non-resident Holder is not entitled to relief under an applicable income tax convention between Canada and the Non-resident Holder’s country of residence. If at the time of such disposition the Class A voting shares are listed on a “designated stock exchange” (which includes the NYSE MKT), the Class A voting shares will generally not constitute taxable Canadian property of a Non-resident Holder unless (A) at any time during the 60-month period that ends at the time the Class A voting shares are disposed of, both (i) 25% or more of the issued shares of any class of the capital stock of the Corporation were owned by or belonged to one or any combination of (a) the Non-resident Holder, (b) persons with whom the Non-resident Holder did not deal at arm’s length, and (c) partnerships in which the Non-resident Holder or a person referred to in (b) holds a membership interest, directly or indirectly, through one or more partnerships, and (ii) more than 50% of the fair market value of the Class A voting shares was derived, directly or indirectly, from one or any combination of real or immovable property situated in Canada, “Canadian resource properties”, “timber resource properties” (as such terms are defined under the Canadian Tax Act) or options in respect of, interests in, or civil law rights in, any such properties, or (B) the Class A voting shares are otherwise deemed to be taxable Canadian property. Generally, to the extent that the Class A voting share are no longer listed on a “designated stock exchange” at the time of their disposition, the above-listed criteria (with the exception of (i)) will apply to determine if the Class A voting shares are “taxable Canadian property”.

As long as Class A voting shares are listed on a “recognized stock exchange” (which includes the NYSE MKT), a Non-resident Holder who disposes of Class A voting shares that are taxable Canadian property will not be required to satisfy the obligations imposed under section 116 of the Canadian Tax Act.

DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY

We file reports, including Annual Reports on Form 20-F, and other information with the SEC pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC that apply to foreign private issuers. You may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the following location of the SEC, Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. Filings we make electronically with the SEC are also available to the public on the Internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

Item 11. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to various market risks. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market prices and rates. We have not entered into derivative or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to market risk from fluctuations in interest rates. Borrowing under the senior secured credit facilities and the term loans from Investissement Québec bear interest at floating rates, which are based on LIBOR or prime plus a fixed additional interest rate. As of March 25, 2017, we have not hedged these interest rate risks. As of March 25, 2017, we had approximately $101.4 million of floating-rate debt. Accordingly, our net income will be affected by changes in interest rates. Assuming a 100 basis point increase or decrease in the interest rate under our floating rate debt, our interest expense on an annualized basis would have increased or decreased, respectively, by approximately $1.0 million.

Currency Risk

While we report our financial results in U.S. dollars, a substantial portion of our sales are earned in Canadian dollars. For our operations located in Canada, non-Canadian currency transactions and assets and liabilities subject us to foreign currency risk. Conversely, for the operations located in the U.S., non-U.S. currency transactions and assets and liabilities subject us to foreign currency risk. For purposes of our financial reporting, our financial statements are reported in U.S. dollars by translating, where necessary, net sales and expenses from Canadian dollars at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period, while assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates, with the effect of such translation recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. As a result, for purposes of our financial reporting, foreign exchange gains or losses recorded in earnings relate to non-Canadian dollar transactions of the operations located in Canada and non-U.S. dollar transactions of the operations located in the U.S. We expect to continue to report our financial results in U.S. dollars in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Consequently, our reported

56

##### Table of Contents

earnings could fluctuate materially as a result of foreign exchange translation gains or losses. To mitigate the impact of foreign exchange volatility on our earnings, from time to time we may enter into agreements to fix the exchange rate of U.S. dollars to Canadian dollars. For example, we may enter into agreements to fix the exchange rate to protect the principal and interest payments on our U.S. dollar denominated debt and other liabilities held in our Canadian operation. If we do so, we will not benefit from any increase in the value of the Canadian dollar compared to the U.S. dollar when these payments become due. As of March 25, 2017, we had not hedged these foreign exchange rate risks. As of March 25, 2017, we had approximately $2.5 million of net liabilities subject to foreign exchange rate risk related to changes in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar, which would impact the level of our earnings if there were fluctuations in U.S. and Canadian dollar exchange rate. Assuming a 100 basis point strengthening or weakening of the Canadian dollar in relationship to the U.S. dollar, as of March 25, 2017, our earnings would have increased or decreased, respectively, by approximately $0.3 million. This analysis does not consider the impact of fluctuations in U.S. and Canadian dollar exchange rates on the translation of Canadian dollar results into U.S. dollars. In addition to the impact on earnings, fluctuation between the U.S. and Canadian dollar exchange rates impacts the level of our borrowing availability under our senior secured revolving credit facility which is denominated in U.S. dollars. Assuming a 100 basis point strengthening or weakening of the Canadian dollar in relationship to the U.S. dollar, as of March 25, 2017, our borrowing availability would have increased or decreased, respectively, by approximately $41,000. Changes in the exchange rates of Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars could also impact our Canadian sales and gross margin if the Canadian dollar strengthens significantly and impacts our Canadian consumers’ behavior.

Commodity Risk

The nature of our operations results in exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices, specifically diamonds, platinum, gold and silver. We monitor prices and may decide, if appropriate, to utilize derivative financial instruments and physical delivery contracts to hedge our exposure to risks related to the change in gold prices. If we utilize derivative financial instruments, we would be exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to the financial instruments. In addition, if gold prices decrease below those levels specified in our various hedging agreements, we would lose the value of a decline in the price of gold which could have an equal effect on our cost of sales. However, such gains may not be realized in future periods and our hedging activities may result in losses, which could be material. No hedging contracts existed as of March 25, 2017. Our retail sales and gross margin could also be materially impacted if prices of diamonds, platinum, gold or silver rise so significantly that our consumers’ behavior changes or if price increases cannot be passed onto our customers.

Item 12. | Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 13. | Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

Not applicable.

Item 14. | Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

Item 15. | Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 20-F. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of March 25, 2017, our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), were effective.

57

##### Table of Contents

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined under Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets, (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to consolidated financial statements preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of our internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Based on that assessment, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of March 25, 2017, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal controls over financial reporting. As a non-accelerated filer, our report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only our report on internal controls over financial reporting in this Annual Report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 16A. | Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Board of Directors determined that Frank Di Tomaso, an independent director, meets the requirements to be designated an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined by the SEC. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Board Practices.”

Item 16B. | Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics, within the meaning of this Item 16B of Form 20-F under the Exchange Act. Our code of ethics applies our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller. Our code of ethics is available on our website at www.birksgroup.com. If we amend the provisions of our code of ethics that apply to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and persons performing similar functions, or if we grant any waiver of such provisions, we will disclose such amendment or waiver on our website at the same address. We also have a similar code of ethics that applies to our financial directors. The Company has also adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to all employees of the Company.

Item 16C. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services

During fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, we retained KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accountant, to provide services in the following categories and amounts:

58

##### Table of Contents

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed by KPMG LLP for professional services rendered for the audit and interim review of our consolidated financial statements was CAD$483,700 ($368,141 in U.S. dollars) in fiscal 2017 and CAD$509,000 ($388,550 in U.S. dollars) in fiscal 2016.

Audit Related Fees

During fiscal 2017 and 2016, KPMG LLP provided audit related services for a total amount of CAD$9,325 ($7,097 in U.S. dollars) and CAD$10,000 ($7,634 in U.S. dollars), respectively.

Tax Fees

During fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, KPMG LLP provided tax advisory services for a total amount of CAD$139,252 ($105,984 in U.S. dollars) and CAD$39,520 ($30,168 in U.S. dollars), respectively.

All Other Fees

During fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, KPMG LLP did not provide other services.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The audit committee has established a pre-approval policy as described in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i) of Regulation S-X. The audit committee approves in writing, in advance, any audit or non-audit services provided to Birks Group by the independent accountants that are not specifically disallowed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. None of the services described in the preceding three sections were approved by the audit committee pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C).

Item 16D. | Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

Not applicable.

Item 16E. | Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We did not, nor did any affiliated purchaser, purchase any of our equity securities during fiscal 2017.

Item 16F. | Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

Not applicable.

Item 16G. | Corporate Governance

Our securities are listed on the NYSE MKT. There are no significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies under the listing standards of that exchange except for proxy delivery requirements. The NYSE MKT requires the solicitation of proxies and delivery of proxy statements for all shareholder meetings, and requires that these proxies be solicited pursuant to a proxy statement that conforms to the proxy rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. As a foreign private issuer, the Company is exempt from the proxy rules set forth in Sections 14(a), 14(b), 14(c) and 14(f) of the Act. The Company solicits proxies in accordance with applicable rules and regulations in Canada.

Item 16H. | Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 17. | Financial Statements

Not applicable.

Item 18. | Financial Statements

The financial statements required by this item are found at the end of this Annual Report beginning on page F-1.

59

##### Table of Contents

PART III

Item 19. | Exhibits

The following exhibits are part of this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

Exhibit Number |  | Description of Document
1.1 |  | Restated Articles of Incorporation of Birks Group Inc., effective as of November 14, 2005. Incorporated by reference from the Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-4 originally filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005 and as subsequently amended on September 8, 2005, September 21, 2005 and September 29, 2005.
1.2 |  | Articles of Amendment of Birks Group Inc., effective as of October 1, 2013. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 25, 2014.
1.3 |  | Articles of Amendment of Birks Group Inc. effective as of October 3, 2014. Incorporated by referenced from Birks Group Inc.’s Form 20-F filed with the SEC on June 26, 2015.
1.4 |  | By-law No. One of Birks Group Inc. adopted on December 28, 1998 and amended on April 9, 2012. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 3, 2012.
2.1 |  | Form of Birks Class A voting share certificate as amended as of October 1, 2013. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 25, 2014.
4.1 |  | Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of April 18, 2005, as amended as of July 27, 2005, among Henry Birks & Sons Inc., Mayor’s, Inc. and Birks Merger Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Incorporated by reference from the Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-4 originally filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005 and as subsequently amended on September 8, 2005, September 21, 2005 and September 29, 2005.
4.2 |  | Form of Directors and Officers Indemnity Agreement. Incorporated by reference from the Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-4 originally filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005 and as subsequently amended on September 8, 2005, September 21, 2005 and September 29, 2005.
4.3 * |  | Form of Directors and Officers Indemnity Agreement.
4.4 |  | Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Employee Stock Option Agreement, dated as of May 1, 1997, amended as of June 20, 2000. Incorporated by reference from the Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-4 originally filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005 and as subsequently amended on September 8, 2005, September 21, 2005 and September 29, 2005.
4.5 |  | Henry Birks & Sons Inc., Form of Amended Stock Option Agreement under the 1997 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Schedule TO-1 filed with the SEC on March 18, 2010.
4.6 |  | Lease Agreement between Birks and Anglo Canadian Investments SA, dated as of December 12, 2000. Incorporated by reference from the Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-4 originally filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005 and as subsequently amended on September 8, 2005, September 21, 2005 and September 29, 2005.
4.7 |  | Agreement of Principal Lease between 7739907 Canada Inc. and Birks Group Inc. executed on March 17, 2017. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on May 12, 2017.
4.8 |  | Lease Agreement between Mayors and Westpoint Business Park, Ltd dated September 13, 2004. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 19, 2006.
4.9 |  | Short Form Industrial Building Lease effective April 11, 2017 between Mayors Jewelers of Florida, Inc. and SPG Palm Crossing LLC. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on May 12, 2017.
4.10 |  | Diamond Supply Agreement between Prime Investments S.A. and Birks, dated as of August 15, 2002. Incorporated by reference from the Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-4 originally filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005 and as subsequently amended on September 8, 2005, September 21, 2005 and September 29, 2005.

60

##### Table of Contents

4.11 |  | Conditional Sale Agreement between Rosy Blue N.V. and Birks, dated as of August 15, 2002. Incorporated by reference from the Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-4 originally filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005 and as subsequently amended on September 8, 2005, September 21, 2005 and September 29, 2005.
4.12 |  | Conditional Sale Agreement between Rosy Blue Inc. and Birks, dated as of August 15, 2002. Incorporated by reference from the Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-4 originally filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005 and as subsequently amended on September 8, 2005, September 21, 2005 and September 29, 2005.
4.13 |  | Conditional Sale Agreement between Rosy Blue Sales Ltd. and Birks, dated as of August 15, 2002. Incorporated by reference from the Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-4 originally filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005 and as subsequently amended on September 8, 2005, September 21, 2005 and September 29, 2005.
4.14 |  | Conditional Sale Agreement between Rosy Blue Hong Kong Ltd. and Birks, dated as of August 15, 2002. Incorporated by reference from the Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-4 originally filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005 and as subsequently amended on September 8, 2005, September 21, 2005 and September 29, 2005.
4.15 |  | Conditional Sale Agreement between Rosy Blue Finance S.A. and Birks, dated as of August 15, 2002. Incorporated by reference from the Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-4 originally filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005 and as subsequently amended on September 8, 2005, September 21, 2005 and September 29, 2005.
4.16 |  | Registration Rights Agreement between Birks and Prime Investments S.A., dated as of February 4, 2005. Incorporated by reference from the Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-4 originally filed with the SEC on July 27, 2005 and as subsequently amended on September 8, 2005, September 21, 2005 and September 29, 2005.
4.17 |  | Employment Agreement between Albert Rahm and Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc., dated as of April 30, 2007 as subsequently amended as of January 12, 2015. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on June 30, 2016.
4.18 |  | Employment Agreement between Miranda Melfi and Birks Group dated February 24, 2006. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 19, 2006.
4.19 |  | Amended and Restated Management Consulting Services Agreement between Birks Group Inc. and Montrovest B.V., dated as of June 8, 2011. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 8, 2011.
4.20 |  | Termination Agreement between Montrovost B.V. and Birks Group Inc., entered into on November 20, 2015. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on June 30, 2016.
4.21 |  | Management Consulting Services Agreement between Birks Group Inc. and Gestofi S.A. entered into as of November 20, 2015. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on June 30, 2016.
4.22 |  | Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc., (f/k/a Jan Bell Marketing, Inc.) 1991 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on April 26, 2006.
4.23 |  | Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc., Form of Amended Stock Option Agreement under the 1991 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Schedule TO-1 filed with the SEC on March 18, 2010.
4.24 |  | Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc., 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on April 26, 2006.

61

##### Table of Contents

4.25 |  | Birks Group Inc. 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Incorporated by reference from Birks Group Inc.’s Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 19, 2006.
4.26 |  | Birks Group Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 19, 2006.
4.27 |  | Birks Group Inc. Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on August 26, 2016.
4.28 |  | Warrant Agreement dated November 14, 2005 between Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc. and Carlo Coda-Nunziante. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 19, 2006.
4.29 |  | Warrant Agreement dated November 14, 2005 between Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc. and Joseph A. Keifer. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 19, 2006.
4.30 |  | Warrant Agreement dated November 14, 2005 between Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc. and Marco Pasteris. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 19, 2006.
4.31 |  | Amended and Restated Warrant Agreement dated November 14, 2005 between Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc. and Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 19, 2006.
4.32 |  | Amended and Restated Warrant Agreement dated November 14, 2005 between Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc. and Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 19, 2006.
4.33 |  | Amended and Restated Warrant Agreement dated November 14, 2005 between Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc. and Henry Birks & Sons Inc. Incorporated by reference the from Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 19, 2006.
4.34 |  | Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on June 18, 2007.
4.35 |  | Loan Agreement between Birks Group Inc. and Investissement Québec, dated January 26, 2009. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 6, 2009.
4.36 |  | Loan Agreement between Birks Group Inc. and Investissement Québec, dated February 20, 2009. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 6, 2009.
4.37 |  | Loan Agreement between Birks Group Inc. and Investissement Québec entered into on September 12, 2013. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 25, 2014.
4.38 |  | Loan Agreement between Birks Group Inc. and Investissement Québec entered into on July 25, 2014. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on June 26, 2015.
4.39 |  | Letter Agreement entered into on August 19, 2015 which amends the loan agreements between Birks Group Inc. and Investissement Québec. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on December 4, 2015.
4.40 |  | Letter Agreement entered into on November 19, 2015 which amends the loan agreements between Birks Group Inc. and Investissement Québec. Incorporated by reference from Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on December 4, 2015.

62

##### Table of Contents

4.41 |  | Letter Agreement between Birks Group Inc. and Investissement Québec dated October 28, 2016 which amends the loan agreement between Birks Group Inc. and Investissement Québec. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on January 24, 2017.
4.42 |  | Amended and Restated Cash Advance Agreement between Birks Group Inc. and Montrovest B.V., dated June 8, 2011. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 8, 2011.
4.43 |  | Renewed and Amended Distribution Agreement between Birks Group Inc., Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc. and Damiani International B.V., dated as of October 3, 2014. + Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on June 26, 2015.
4.44 |  | Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement, among Birks Group Inc., Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc. Certain Financial Institutions, as Lenders, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A. (acting through its Canada branch) as Canadian Agent, Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Co-Collateral Agents with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Co-Lead Arrangers and Co-Book Managers, dated as of June 8, 2011 (the “Revolver Agreement”). Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on July 8, 2011.
4.45 |  | Master Lease Agreement dated as of June 21, 2013, among Varilease Finance, Inc., Mayor’s Jewelers of Florida, Inc. and Mayor’s Jewelers Inc. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on September 3, 2013.
4.46 |  | Master Lease Agreement dated March 15, 2017 among Birks Group Inc., Mayors Jewelers of Florida, Inc. and Onset Financial, Inc. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filing with the SEC on May 12, 2017.
4.47 |  | Convertible Debenture Agreement, dated August 16, 2013, between Montrovest B.V. and Birks Group. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on September 3, 2013.
4.48 |  | Convertible Debenture Agreement, dated August 23, 2013, between Rhino 66 and Birks Group. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on September 3, 2013.
4.49 |  | First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated August 22, 2013. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on September 3, 2013.
4.50 |  | Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated May 12, 2014. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on June 19, 2014.
4.51 |  | Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated June 10, 2014. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on June 19, 2014.
4.52 |  | Letter Agreement between Mayor’s Jewelers and Thomas A. Andruskevich, dated November 14, 2005. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-3 filed with the SEC on March 25, 2011.
4.53 |  | Letter Agreement between Mayor’s Jewelers and Filippo Recami, dated November 14, 2005. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-3 filed with the SEC on March 25, 2011.

63

##### Table of Contents

4.54 |  | Letter Agreement between Mayor’s Jewelers and Joseph Keifer, dated November 14, 2005. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-3 filed with the SEC on March 25, 2011.
4.55 |  | Letter Agreement between Mayor’s Jewelers and Marco Pasteris, dated November 14, 2005. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-3 filed with the SEC on March 25, 2011.
4.56 |  | Letter Agreement between Mayor’s Jewelers and Carlo Coda-Nunziante, dated November 14, 2005. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-3 filed with the SEC on March 25, 2011.
4.57 |  | Employment Agreement between Birks Group Inc. and Jean-Christophe Bédos, dated January 4, 2012. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed with the SEC on April 27, 2012.
4.58 |  | Amendment Letter to Employment Agreement between Birks Group Inc. and Jean-Christophe Bédos dated April 18, 2013. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on June 26, 2015.
4.59 |  | Amendment Letter to Employment Agreement between Birks Group Inc. and Jean-Christophe Bédos effective October 1, 2015. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on June 30, 2016.
4.60 |  | Employment Agreement between Birks Group Inc. and Pasquale (Pat) Di Lillo, dated October 30, 2014. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on November 11, 2014.
4.61 |  | Fourth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated as of July 25, 2014. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on June 26, 2015.
4.62 |  | Fifth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of November 21, 2014. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014.
4.63 |  | Third Amended and Restated Term Loan and Security Agreement dated November 21, 2014. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014.
4.64 |  | Sixth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement and Amendment to Fourth Amendment, dated as of March 19, 2015. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on March 20, 2015.
4.65 |  | Seventh Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of July 14, 2015. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on July 24, 2015.
4.66 |  | Eighth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2015. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on December 4, 2015.
4.67 |  | Ninth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2016. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on January 24, 2017.
4.68 |  | First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Term Loan and Security Agreement dated March 19, 2015. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on March 20, 2015.

64

##### Table of Contents

4.69 |  | Second Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Term Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of July 14, 2015. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on July 24, 2015.
4.70 |  | Third Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Term Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2015. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on December 4, 2015.
4.71 |  | Fourth Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Term Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2016. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 6-K filed with the SEC on January 24, 2017.
4.72 |  | Asset Purchase Agreement entered into between Birks Group Inc. and Rideau Recognition Solutions Inc. on July 29, 2015. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Form 20-F filed with the SEC on June 30, 2016.
4.73 |  | Canadian Offering Memorandum, dated as of April 27, 2012. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed with the SEC on April 27, 2012.
4.74 |  | Form of Subscription Rights Certificate. Incorporated by reference from the Birks Group Inc. Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed with the SEC on May 24, 2012.
8.1* |  | Subsidiaries of Birks Group Inc.
12.1* |  | Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a).
12.2* |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a).
13.1* |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
13.2* |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
15.1* |  | Consent of KPMG LLP.
101.INS* |  | XBRL Instance Document*
101.SCH* |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*
101.CAL* |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document*
101.DEF* |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*
101.LAB* |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document*
101.PRE* |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document*

* | Filed herewith.

+ | Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to certain portions of this exhibit. Omitted portions have been filed separately with the SEC.

65

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf.

|  |  |  | BIRKS GROUP INC.
Date: June 23, 2017 |  |  |  | /s/ Pasquale (Pat) Di Lillo
|  |  |  | Pasquale (Pat) Di Lillo,
|  |  |  | Vice President, Chief Financial & Administrative Officer

66

##### Table of Contents

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

|  | Page |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |  |  | F-2 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016 |  |  | F-3 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Fiscal Years Ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015 |  |  | F-4 |
Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Fiscal Years Ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015 |  |  | F-5 |
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Fiscal Years Ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015 |  |  | F-6 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Years Ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, March 28, 2015 |  |  | F-7 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |  |  | F-8 |

F-1

##### Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Birks Group Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Birks Group Inc. as of March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016 and the related consolidated statements of operations, other comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Birks Group Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Birks Group Inc. as of March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016 and its consolidated results of operations and its consolidated cash flows for the years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ KPMG LLP*

June 22, 2017

Montréal, Canada

*CPA auditor, CA, public accountancy permit No. A125211 |  | KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP

F-2

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

|  | As of |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 1,944 |  |  | $ | 2,344 |
Accounts receivable |  |  | 13,561 |  |  |  | 10,293 |
Inventories |  |  | 132,069 |  |  |  | 137,839 |
Prepaids and other current assets |  |  | 2,191 |  |  |  | 1,793 |
Total current assets |  |  | 149,765 |  |  |  | 152,269 |
Property and equipment |  |  | 22,990 |  |  |  | 29,419 |
Intangible assets |  |  | 690 |  |  |  | 792 |
Other assets |  |  | 190 |  |  |  | 493 |
Deferred incomes taxes |  |  | 5,303 |  |  |  | — |
Total non-current assets |  |  | 29,173 |  |  |  | 30,704 |
Total assets |  | $ | 178,938 |  |  | $ | 182,973 |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Bank indebtedness |  | $ | 70,434 |  |  | $ | 62,431 |
Accounts payable |  |  | 46,657 |  |  |  | 46,730 |
Accrued liabilities |  |  | 8,386 |  |  |  | 9,040 |
Current portion of long-term debt |  |  | 2,810 |  |  |  | 5,634 |
Total current liabilities |  |  | 128,287 |  |  |  | 123,835 |
Long-term debt |  |  | 30,525 |  |  |  | 46,651 |
Other long-term liabilities |  |  | 7,330 |  |  |  | 4,783 |
Total long-term liabilities |  |  | 37,855 |  |  |  | 51,434 |
Commitments and Contingencies |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Stockholders’ equity: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Class A common stock – no par value, unlimited shares authorized, issued and outstanding 10,242,911 |  |  | 30,988 |  |  |  | 30,988 |
Class B common stock – no par value, unlimited shares authorized, issued and outstanding 7,717,970 |  |  | 38,613 |  |  |  | 38,613 |
Preferred stock – no par value, unlimited shares authorized, none issued |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Additional paid-in capital |  |  | 16,372 |  |  |  | 16,216 |
Accumulated deficit |  |  | (73,921 | ) |  |  | (78,849 | )
Accumulated other comprehensive income |  |  | 744 |  |  |  | 736 |
Total stockholders’ equity |  |  | 12,796 |  |  |  | 7,704 |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |  | $ | 178,938 |  |  | $ | 182,973 |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

On behalf of the Board of Directors:

/s/ Jean-Christophe Bédos |  | /s/ Frank Di Tomaso
Jean-Christophe Bédos, Director |  | Frank Di Tomaso, Director

F-3

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
|  | (In thousands, except per share amounts) |
Net sales |  | $ | 286,921 |  |  | $ | 285,826 |  |  | $ | 301,637 |
Cost of sales |  |  | 178,487 |  |  |  | 176,439 |  |  |  | 183,832 |
Gross profit |  |  | 108,434 |  |  |  | 109,387 |  |  |  | 117,805 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |  |  | 94,226 |  |  |  | 91,125 |  |  |  | 103,735 |
Restructuring charges |  |  | 842 |  |  |  | 754 |  |  |  | 2,604 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 5,034 |  |  |  | 5,229 |  |  |  | 5,932 |
Gain on sale of assets |  |  | — |  |  |  | (3,229 | ) |  |  | — |
Impairment of long-lived assets |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 238 |
Total operating expenses |  |  | 100,102 |  |  |  | 93,879 |  |  |  | 112,509 |
Operating income |  |  | 8,332 |  |  |  | 15,508 |  |  |  | 5,296 |
Interest and other financing costs |  |  | 8,681 |  |  |  | 10,020 |  |  |  | 11,285 |
Debt extinguishment charges |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,643 |
Income (loss) before income taxes |  |  | (349 | ) |  |  | 5,488 |  |  |  | (8,632 | )
Income tax (recovery) expense |  |  | (5,277 | ) |  |  | 50 |  |  |  | — |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | 4,928 |  |  | $ | 5,438 |  |  | $ | (8,632 | )
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  |  | 17,961 |  |  |  | 17,961 |  |  |  | 17,937 |
Diluted |  |  | 18,418 |  |  |  | 17,961 |  |  |  | 17,937 |
Net income (loss) per share: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  | $ | 0.27 |  |  | $ | 0.30 |  |  | $ | (0.48 | )
Diluted |  | $ | 0.27 |  |  | $ | 0.30 |  |  | $ | (0.48 | )

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive Income (loss)

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
|  | (In thousands, except per share amounts) |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | 4,928 |  |  | $ | 5,438 |  |  | $ | (8,632 | )
Other comprehensive loss: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign currency translation adjustments (1) |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | (666 | ) |  |  | (2,359 | )
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |  | $ | 4,936 |  |  | $ | 4,772 |  |  | $ | (10,991 | )

(1) | Item that may be reclassified to the Statement of Operations in future periods

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(In thousands of dollars except shares amounts)

|  | Voting common stock outstanding |  |  | Voting common stock |  |  | Additional paid-in capital |  |  | Accumulated deficit |  |  | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |  |  | Total |
Balance at March 29, 2014 |  |  | 17,849,509 |  |  | $ | 69,475 |  |  | $ | 16,041 |  |  | $ | (75,655 | ) |  | $ | 3,761 |  |  | $ | 13,622 |
Net loss |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (8,632 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (8,632 | )
Cumulative translation adjustment(1) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (2,359 | ) |  |  | (2,359 | )
Total comprehensive loss |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (10,991 | )
Compensation expense resulting from stock options granted to Management |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 76 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 76 |
Exercise of stock options |  |  | 111,372 |  |  |  | 126 |  |  |  | (10 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 116 |
Balance at March 28, 2015 |  |  | 17,960,881 |  |  | $ | 69,601 |  |  | $ | 16,107 |  |  | $ | (84,287 | ) |  | $ | 1,402 |  |  | $ | 2,823 |
Net income |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 5,438 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 5,438 |
Cumulative translation adjustment(1) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (666 | ) |  |  | (666 | )
Total comprehensive income |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 4,772 |
Compensation expense resulting from stock options granted to Management |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 109 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 109 |
Balance at March 26, 2016 |  |  | 17,960,881 |  |  | $ | 69,601 |  |  | $ | 16,216 |  |  | $ | (78,849 | ) |  | $ | 736 |  |  | $ | 7,704 |
Net income |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 4,928 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 4,928 |
Cumulative translation adjustment(1) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 8 |
Total comprehensive income |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 4,936 |
Compensation expense resulting from stock options and stock appreciation rights granted to Management |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 156 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 156 |
Balance at March 25, 2017 |  |  | 17,960,881 |  |  | $ | 69,601 |  |  | $ | 16,372 |  |  | $ | (73,921 | ) |  | $ | 744 |  |  | $ | 12,796 |

(1) | The change in cumulative translation adjustments is not due to reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-6

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | 4,928 |  |  | $ | 5,438 |  |  | $ | (8,632 | )
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Deferred income taxes |  |  | (5,303 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 5,065 |  |  |  | 5,275 |  |  |  | 5,991 |
Impairment of long-lived assets |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 238 |
Amortization of debt costs |  |  | 947 |  |  |  | 973 |  |  |  | 724 |
Debt extinguishment charges |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,643 |
Other operating activities, net |  |  | 440 |  |  |  | 31 |  |  |  | 342 |
Loss (Gain) on sale of assets |  |  | — |  |  |  | (3,229 | ) |  |  | — |
(Increase) decrease in: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts receivable and other receivables |  |  | (3,915 | ) |  |  | (3,189 | ) |  |  | (1,515 | )
Inventories |  |  | 5,244 |  |  |  | (6,671 | ) |  |  | (750 | )
Prepaids and other current assets |  |  | (530 | ) |  |  | 517 |  |  |  | (552 | )
Increase (decrease) in: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable |  |  | 838 |  |  |  | 2,742 |  |  |  | 11,039 |
Accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities |  |  | (452 | ) |  |  | 2,817 |  |  |  | 1,072 |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |  |  | 7,262 |  |  |  | 4,704 |  |  |  | 10,600 |
Cash flows (used in) from investing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Additions to property and equipment |  |  | (5,060 | ) |  |  | (6,476 | ) |  |  | (6,277 | )
Proceeds from sale of assets (net of fees of $0.2 million) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 4,072 |  |  |  | — |
Other investing activities, net |  |  | (12 | ) |  |  | (37 | ) |  |  | (48 | )
Net cash used in investing activities |  |  | (5,072 | ) |  |  | (2,441 | ) |  |  | (6,325 | )
Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Increase (decrease) in bank indebtedness |  |  | 8,712 |  |  |  | 1,043 |  |  |  | (4,821 | )
Repayment of obligations under capital leases |  |  | (1,610 | ) |  |  | (2,263 | ) |  |  | (2,003 | )
Proceeds from capital lease funding |  |  | 375 |  |  |  | 43 |  |  |  | 1,000 |
Proceeds from stock option exercise |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 116 |
Payment of deferred financing fees and costs |  |  | (1,237 | ) |  |  | (444 | ) |  |  | (4,019 | )
Repayment of long-term debt |  |  | (8,777 | ) |  |  | (2,956 | ) |  |  | (1,144 | )
Increase in long-term debt |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,500 |  |  |  | 6,828 |
Other financing activities |  |  | (50 | ) |  |  | (25 | ) |  |  | (14 | )
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |  |  | (2,587 | ) |  |  | (2,102 | ) |  |  | (4,057 | )
Effect of exchange rate on cash |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | (173 | ) |  |  | (190 | )
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |  |  | (400 | ) |  |  | (12 | ) |  |  | 28 |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |  |  | 2,344 |  |  |  | 2,356 |  |  |  | 2,328 |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |  | $ | 1,944 |  |  | $ | 2,344 |  |  | $ | 2,356 |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest paid |  | $ | 8,477 |  |  | $ | 8,508 |  |  | $ | 9,100 |
Non-cash transactions: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Property and equipment additions acquired through capital leases |  | $ | 376 |  |  | $ | 43 |  |  | $ | — |
Property and equipment additions included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  | $ | 1,078 |  |  | $ | 1,055 |  |  | $ | 580 |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-7

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

Birks Group Inc. (“Birks Group” or “Birks” or “the Company”) is incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act. The principal business activities of the Company and its subsidiaries are the design, manufacture (until May 31, 2016) and retail sale of prestige jewelry, timepieces and giftware. The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared using a fiscal year which consists of 52 or 53 weeks and ends on the last Saturday in March of each year. The fiscal years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015 include 52 weeks.

1. | Basis of presentation:

These consolidated financial statements, which include the accounts of the Canadian parent company Birks Group Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc. (“Mayors”), are reported in U.S. dollars and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. These principles require management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported and disclosed in the financial statements and related notes.

The most significant estimates and judgments include assessing the valuation of inventories, accounts receivable, deferred tax assets, the recoverability of long-lived assets and the substantial doubt assessment of the going concern assumption. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Periodically, the Company reviews all significant estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements relative to current conditions and records the effect of any necessary adjustments. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

Future operations

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. The going concern basis of presentation assumes that the Company will continue its operations for the foreseeable future and be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company’s ability to fund its operations and meet its cash flow requirements in order to fund its operations is dependent upon its ability to maintain profitable operations as well as specified excess availability levels under its senior secured revolving credit facility and its senior secured term loan, and adhering to certain financial covenants described in note 7.

The Company reported net income of $4.9 million and $5.4 million for fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, respectively. In fiscal 2015, the Company incurred a net loss of $8.6 million. Maintenance of sufficient availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed financing is necessary for the Company to fund its day-to-day operations. The Company’s ability to make scheduled payments of principal, or to pay the interest or additional interest, if any, or to fund planned capital expenditures and store operations will depend on its ability to maintain adequate levels of available borrowing and its future performance, which to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors, as well as other events that are beyond the Company’s control. Approximately 27% of the Company’s store leases are renewable within two years. The Company’s capital expenditure requirements relating to renewing store leases is such that less than 23% of all store leases require capital expenditures in the next two years. The capital expenditures related to retail store locations in both Canada and the U.S. are estimated to be approximately $13.9 million over the next two years to remodel, relocate or open new stores. Of the $13.9 million, we estimate that $8.1 million will be spent in fiscal 2018 leaving the balance to fiscal 2019. The availability of financing will impact our ability to renew leases or enter into new ones, which can in turn, impact the number of retail locations we operate and the level of sales we generate in the future.

F-8

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

The Company funds its operation primarily through committed financings under its senior secured credit facilities and term loans. The Company’s ability to fund its operations and meet its cash flow requirements is dependent upon its ability to maintain positive excess availability of at least $6.0 million under the senior secured revolving credit facility ($8.0 million prior to December 21, 2016). As of March 25, 2017, the Company had approximately $70.4 million outstanding on the $110.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility. The Company’s excess borrowing capacity was $14.6 million as of March 25, 2017 and $16.2 million as of March 26, 2016. The Company had positive excess availability of at least $6.0 million throughout fiscal 2017. As the Company is forecasting to have excess availability of at least $6.0 million for at least the next twelve months, it does not expect that the minimum adjusted EBITDA financial covenant will have to be tested. The senior secured revolving credit facility along with the senior secured term loan are used to finance working capital, finance capital expenditures, provide liquidity to fund our day-to-day operations and for other general corporate purposes. In December 2016, the Company executed an amendment to the terms of its senior secured revolving credit facility to extend the maturity from August 22, 2017 to the earlier to occur of (a) December 21, 2021 and (b) the date that is 91 days prior to the maturity date then in effect with respect to the senior secured term loan debt. The Company also executed an amendment to the terms of its senior secured term loan to extend the maturity from August 22, 2018 to May 21, 2021.

As part of the amendments to the senior secured revolving credit facility and the senior secured term loan, the minimum excess availability levels required to be maintained by the Company has been reduced from $8.0 million to $6.0 million. The amendments to the senior secured revolving credit facility and the senior secured term loan also include a reduction to the minimum adjusted EBITDA levels and reduce the seasonal availability blocks imposed from December 20th to January 20th of each year from $12.5 million to $11.5 million and from January 21st to February 10th from $5.0 million to $4.0 million. Failure to meet the minimum adjusted EBITDA covenant (calculated on a twelve-month rolling basis as defined in the agreement) in the event that excess availability falls below $6.0 million for any five consecutive business days is considered an event of default under the amended agreements, that could result in the outstanding balances borrowed under the Company’s senior secured term loan and senior secured revolving credit facility becoming due immediately, which would result in cross defaults on the Company’s other borrowings.

In addition, our senior secured revolving credit facility administrative agent may impose, at any time, discretionary reserves, which would lower the level of borrowing availability under our senior secured revolving credit facility (customary for asset-based loans) at their reasonable discretion to: i) ensure that we maintain adequate liquidity for the operation of our business, ii) cover any deterioration in the amount or value of the collateral, and iii) reflect impediments to the lenders to realize upon the collateral. There is no limit to the amount of discretionary reserves that the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility administrative agent may impose at its reasonable discretion. No discretionary reserves were imposed during fiscal 2015, fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017 by the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility administrative agent. While the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility lenders or their administrative agent have not historically imposed such a restriction, it is uncertain whether conditions could change and cause such a reserve to be imposed in the future. In addition, the value of the Company’s inventory and accounts receivables is periodically assessed by its senior secured lenders and based upon these reviews the Company’s borrowing capacity could be significantly increased or decreased. Another factor impacting the Company’s excess availability includes, among other things, changes in the U.S. and Canadian dollar exchange rate, which could increase or decrease the Company’s borrowing availability. As of March 25, 2017, every 100 basis point strengthening or weakening of the Canadian versus the U.S. dollar would cause an approximate $41,000 increase or decrease, respectively, in the amount of excess availability. The Company met its excess availability requirement as of March 25, 2017 and as of the date of its Form 20-F.

F-9

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

Both the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility and the senior secured term loan are subject to cross default provisions with all other loans pursuant to which if the Company is in default of any other loan, the Company will immediately be in default of both the senior secured revolving credit facility and the senior secured term loan.

The Company continues to be actively engaged in identifying alternative sources of financing that include raising additional funds through public or private equity, the disposal of assets, and debt financing, including funding from governmental sources which may not be possible as the success of raising additional funds is beyond the Company’s control. The incurrence of additional indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could result in operating and financing covenants that could restrict the Company’s operations. Financing may be unavailable in amounts or on terms acceptable to the Company or at all, which may have a material adverse impact on its business, including its ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company believes that it will be able to adequately fund its operations and meet its cash flow requirements for at least the next twelve months. If the Company does not maintain positive excess availability under its senior secured revolving credit facilities and the lenders exercise their right to demand repayment of balances owed under these credit facilities, the Company may be unable to obtain additional financing. These financial statements do not reflect adjustments that would be necessary if the going concern assumption was not appropriate.

2. | Significant accounting policies:

(a) | Revenue recognition:

Sales are recognized at the point of sale when merchandise is picked up by the customer or delivered to a customer. Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are included in net sales.

Revenues for gift certificate sales and store credits are recognized upon redemption. Prior to recognition as a sale, gift certificates are recorded as accounts payable on the balance sheet. Based on historical redemption rates, a portion of gift certificates and store credits, not subject to unclaimed property laws, are recorded as income. Gift certificates and store credits outstanding and subject to unclaimed property laws are maintained as accrued liabilities until remitted in accordance with local ordinances.

Sales of consignment merchandise are recognized at such time as the merchandise is sold, and are recorded on a gross basis because the Company is the primary obligor of the transaction, has general latitude on setting the price, has discretion as to the suppliers, is involved in the selection of the product and has inventory loss risk.

Sales are reported net of returns and sales taxes. The Company generally gives its customers the right to return merchandise purchased by them within 10 to 90 days, depending on the product sold and records a provision at the time of sale for the effect of the estimated returns.

Revenues for repair services are recognized when the service is delivered to and accepted by the customer.

Revenue related to the Company’s purchases of gold and other precious metals from our customers are recognized when the Company delivers the goods, and receives and accepts an offer from a refiner to purchase the gold and other precious metal.

Licensing fees are recognized when the product is delivered to and accepted by the customer.

F-10

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

(b) | Cost of sales:

Cost of sales includes direct inbound freight and duties, direct labor related to repair services, design and creative, the jewelry studio, inventory shrink, inventory thefts, and boxes (jewelry, watch and giftware). Indirect freight including inter-store transfers, purchasing and receiving costs, distribution costs and warehousing costs are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Purchase discounts are recorded as a reduction of inventory cost and are recorded to cost of sales as the items are sold. Mark down dollars received from vendors are recorded as a reduction of inventory costs to the specific items to which they apply and are recognized in cost of sales once the items are sold. Included in cost of sales is depreciation related to manufacturing machinery, equipment and facilities of $31,000, $46,000 and $59,000 for the fiscal years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015, respectively.

(c) | Cash and cash equivalents:

The Company utilizes a cash management system under which a book cash overdraft may exist in its primary disbursement account. These overdrafts, when applicable, represent uncleared checks in excess of cash balance in the bank account at the end of a reporting period and have been reclassified to accounts payable on the consolidated balance sheets.

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Amounts receivable from credit card issuers are included in cash and cash equivalents and are typically converted to cash within 2 to 4 days of the original sales transaction. These amounts totaled $1.9 million and $2.3 million at March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, respectively.

(d) | Accounts receivable:

Accounts receivable arise primarily from customers’ use of our private label credit card and wholesale sales. Several installment sales plans are offered to our private label credit card holders which vary as to repayment terms and finance charges. Finance charges on the Company’s consumer credit receivables, when applicable, accrue at rates ranging from 0% to 10.99% per annum for financing plans. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts associated with the accounts receivable recorded on the balance sheet for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The allowance is determined based on a combination of factors including, but not limited to, the length of time that the receivables are past due, the Company’s knowledge of the customer, economic and market conditions and historical write-off experiences. The Company classifies a receivable account as past due if a required payment amount has not been received within the allotted time frame (generally 30 days), after which internal collection efforts commence. Once all internal collection efforts have been exhausted and management has reviewed the account, the account is put on nonaccrual status and may be sent for external collection or legal action. Upon the suspension of the accrual of interest, interest income is recognized to the extent cash payments received exceed the balance of the principal amount owed on the account. After all collection efforts have been exhausted, including internal and external collection efforts, an account is written off.

The Company guarantees a portion of its private label credit card sales to its credit card vendor. The Company maintains a liability associated with these outstanding amounts. Similar to the allowance for doubtful accounts, the liability related to these guaranteed sales amounts are based on a combination of factors including the length of time the receivables are past due to the Company’s credit card vendor, the Company’s knowledge of the customer, economic and market conditions and historical write-off experiences of similar credits. If the financial conditions of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

F-11

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

(e) | Inventories:

Retail inventories and inventories of raw materials are valued at the lower of average cost or market. Inventories of work in progress and Company manufactured finished goods are valued at the lower of average cost (which includes material, labor and overhead costs) or market. The Company records provisions for lower of cost or market, damaged goods, and slow-moving inventory. The cost of inbound freight and duties are included in the carrying value of the inventories.

The allowance for inventory shrink is estimated for the period from the last physical inventory date to the end of the reporting period on a store by store basis and at our distribution centers. The shrink rate from the most recent physical inventory, in combination with historical experience, is the basis for providing a shrink allowance. Inventory is written down for estimated slow moving inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

(f) | Property and equipment:

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Maintenance and repair costs are charged to selling, general and administrative expenses as incurred, while expenditures for major renewals and improvements are capitalized. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

Asset |  | Period
Buildings |  | Lesser of term of the lease or the economic life
Leasehold improvements |  | Lesser of term of the lease or the economic life
Software and electronic equipment |  | 1 - 6 years
Molds |  | 2 - 5 years
Furniture and fixtures |  | 5 - 8 years
Equipment |  | 3 - 8 years

(g) | Intangible assets:

Trademarks and tradenames are amortized using the straight-line method over a period of 15 to 20 years. The Company had $1.8 million and $1.8 million of intangible assets at March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, respectively. The Company had $1.1 million and $1.0 million of accumulated amortization of intangibles at March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, respectively.

(h) | Deferred financing costs:

The Company amortizes deferred financing costs incurred in connection with its financing agreements using the effective interest method over the term of the related financing. Such deferred costs are presented as a reduction to long-term debt in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

(i) | Warranty accrual:

The Company generally provides warranties on its jewelry and watches for periods extending up to three years and has a battery replacement policy for its private label watches. The Company accrues a liability based on its historical repair costs for such warranties.

F-12

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

(j) | Income taxes:

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of (a) temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial statement reporting purposes and the bases for income tax purposes, and (b) operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred income tax assets are evaluated and, if realization is not considered to be more-likely-than-not, a valuation allowance is provided (see note 10(a)).

(k) | Foreign exchange:

Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rates prevailing at the respective transaction dates. Revenue and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated at average rates prevailing during the year. Foreign exchange losses of $0.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.4 million were recorded in cost of goods sold for the years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015, respectively and $0.1 million, ($0.2) million and ($0.5) million of gains (losses) on foreign exchange were recorded in interest and other financial costs related to U.S. dollar denominated debt of the Company’s Canadian operations for the years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015, respectively.

Birks Group’s Canadian operations’ functional currency is the Canadian dollar while the reporting currency of the Company is the U.S. dollar. The assets and liabilities denominated in Canadian dollars are translated for reporting purposes at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates. Revenue and expense items are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the periods. The resulting gains and losses are accumulated in other comprehensive income.

(l) | Impairment of long-lived assets:

The Company periodically reviews the estimated useful lives of its depreciable assets and changes in useful lives are made on a prospective basis unless factors indicate the carrying amounts of the assets may not be recoverable and an impairment write-down is necessary. However, the Company will review its long-lived assets for impairment once events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of an asset and its eventual disposition is less than its carrying value. Measurement of an impairment loss for such long-lived assets would be based on the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the asset, with fair value being determined based upon discounted cash flows or appraised values, depending on the nature of the asset. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. During fiscal 2015, the Company recorded impairment charges on long-lived assets of $0.2 million associated with a Canadian Birks retail shop-in-shop location due to the projected operating performance of the location and a software impairment associated with a decision to abandon a software project. No impairment charge was recorded in fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016.

(m) | Advertising and marketing costs:

Advertising and marketing costs are generally charged to expense as incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. However, certain expenses such as those related to catalogs are expensed at the time such catalogs are shipped to recipients. The Company and its vendors participate in cooperative advertising programs in which the vendors reimburse the Company for a portion of certain specific advertising costs which are netted against advertising expense in selling, general and administrative expenses, and amounted to $2.6 million, $2.7 million and $2.9 million for each of the years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015, respectively. Advertising and marketing expense, net of vendor cooperative advertising allowances, amounted to $8.7 million, $9.0 million and $9.5 million in the years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015, respectively.

F-13

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

(n) | Restructuring charges:

Restructuring charges consist of exit costs and other costs associated with the reorganization of the Company’s operations, including the consolidation of most of the Company’s administrative workforce from its regional office in Tamarac, Florida to its Montreal corporate head office. Restructuring charges include severance and stay bonuses for employees being terminated, sublease costs and related losses recognized related to the abandonment of a portion of the Company’s Tamarac facilities and other costs related to the transition of administrative positions to Montreal including employee recruitment costs, temporary duplication of salaries related to the transition and travel and relocation costs. Costs associated with restructuring activities are recorded when the liability is incurred or when such costs are deemed probable and estimable and represent the Company’s best estimate.

(o) | Pre-opening expenses:

Pre-opening expenses related to the opening of new and relocated stores are expensed in the period incurred.

(p) | Operating leases:

Lessor incentive amounts on operating leases are deferred and amortized as a reduction of rent expense over the term of the lease. Rent expense is recorded on a straight-line basis, which takes into effect any rent escalations, rent holidays and fixturing periods. Deferred operating lease liabilities amounted to $5.0 million at March 25, 2017 ($4.4 million at March 26, 2016) presented as other long term liabilities. Lease terms are from the inception of the fixturing period until the end of the initial lease term and generally exclude renewal periods. However, renewal periods would be included in instances in which the exercise of the renewal period option would be reasonably assured and failure to exercise such option would result in an economic penalty. Contingent rent payments vary by lease, are based on a percentage of revenue above a predetermined sales level and are expensed when it becomes probable the sales levels will be achieved. This level is different for each location and includes and excludes various types of sales.

(q) | Earnings per common share:

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed as net earnings divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS includes the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of stock options, warrants and equity settled stock appreciation rights.

F-14

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015:

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
|  | (In thousands, except per share data) |
Basic income (loss) per common share computation: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Numerator: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | 4,928 |  |  | $ | 5,438 |  |  | $ | (8,632 | )
Denominator: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |  |  | 17,961 |  |  |  | 17,961 |  |  |  | 17,937 |
Income (loss) per common share |  | $ | 0.27 |  |  | $ | 0.30 |  |  | $ | (0.48 | )
Diluted income (loss) per common share computation: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Numerator: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | 4,928 |  |  | $ | 5,438 |  |  | $ | (8,632 | )
Denominator: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |  |  | 17,961 |  |  |  | 17,961 |  |  |  | 17,937 |
Dilutive effect of stock options and warrants |  |  | 457 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding – diluted |  |  | 18,418 |  |  |  | 17,961 |  |  |  | 17,937 |
Diluted income (loss) per common share |  | $ | 0.27 |  |  | $ | 0.30 |  |  | $ | (0.48 | )

For the year ended March 25, 2017, the effect from the assumed exercise of 417,377 Class A voting shares underlying outstanding stock options and 382,693 Class A voting shares underlying outstanding warrants was excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share due to their antidilutive effect. For the year ended March 26, 2016, the effect from the assumed exercise of 666,789 Class A voting shares underlying outstanding stock options and 382,693 Class A voting shares underlying outstanding warrants was excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share due to their antidilutive effect. For the year ended March 28, 2015, the effect from the assumed exercise of 442,088 Class A voting shares underlying outstanding stock options and 382,693 Class A voting shares underlying outstanding warrants was excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share due to their antidilutive effect.

(r) | Commodity and currency risk:

The Company has exposure to market risk related to gold, silver, platinum and diamond purchases and foreign exchange risk. The Company may periodically enter into gold futures contracts to economically hedge a portion of these risks. During the years ended and as of March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, there were no such contracts outstanding.

F-15

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

(s) | Recent Accounting Pronouncements adopted during the year:

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected. The Company has adopted this new guidance as of March 26, 2016 on a retrospective basis and has adjusted the balance sheet of each individual period presented to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. This ASU has impacted the Company’s balance sheet presentation by reclassifying deferred financing costs of $1.1 million as at March 25, 2017 and $1.7 million as at March 26, 2016 which were previously accounted for as an asset, as a reduction of the debt liability.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-05 – Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement (an update to Subtopic 350-40, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software ), which provides guidance on accounting for cloud computing fees and states that if a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the license element of the arrangement should be accounted for in a manner consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses, whereas if a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the arrangement should be accounted for as a service contract. The guidance was adopted by the Company in fiscal year 2017. The Company has elected to apply this standard retrospectively as a result of the Company engaging a leading provider of intelligent business solutions to enterprise and mid-market companies for the implementation of a range of solutions based upon Microsoft Dynamics AX in March 2016. This ASU did not have a material impact on the prior year financial statements. Up-front payments related to the software license and other costs incurred related to enhancing and configuring the new system are included in prepaid and other current assets.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15 - Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern, which defines management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and provide related disclosures. This ASU provides guidance to an organization’s management, with principles and definitions to reduce diversity in the timing and content of financial statement disclosures commonly provided by organizations. This ASU was adopted by the Company in the current fiscal year and had no material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

(t) | Recent Accounting Pronouncement not yet adopted:

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. In 2016, the FASB issued three additional ASUs to provide clarification to Topic 606. The ASUs will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for the Company for its fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is evaluating the impact of adopting these standards will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11 – Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, which states an entity should measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. This amendment applies to all inventory that is measured using the average costs or first-in first-out (FIFO) methods. This supersedes prior guidance which allowed entities to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market, where market could be replacement cost, net realizable value

F-16

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

or net realizable value less an approximately normal profit margin. This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The amendments should be applied prospectively and earlier application is permitted. Management does not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 - “Leases (Topic 842).” The new guidance primarily impacts lessee accounting by requiring the recognition of a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability on the balance sheet for long-term lease agreements. The lease liability will be equal to the present value of all reasonably certain lease payments. The right-of-use asset will be based on the liability, subject to adjustment for initial direct costs. Lease agreements that are 12 months or less are permitted to be excluded from the balance sheet. In general, leases will be amortized on a straight-line basis with the exception of finance lease agreements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13 - Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), which amends guidance on reporting credit losses for assets held at amortized cost basis and available for sale debt securities. For assets held at amortized cost, the new guidance eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold in current GAAP and, instead, requires an entity to reflect its current estimate of all expected credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial assets to present the net amount expected to be collected. ASU 2016-13 will affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off balance sheet credit exposures, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15 - Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (Topic 230). The new guidance primarily addresses the presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. The following eight specific cash flows issues are addressed: Debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies (COLIs) and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

F-17

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

3. | Accounts receivable:

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, at March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016 consist of the following:

|  | As of |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Customer trade receivables |  | $ | 10,389 |  |  | $ | 8,041 |
Other receivables |  |  | 3,172 |  |  |  | 2,252 |
|  | $ | 13,561 |  |  | $ | 10,293 |

Continuity of the allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows (in thousands):

Balance March 29, 2014 |  | $ | 1,806 |
Additional provision recorded |  |  | 613 |
Net write-offs |  |  | (160 | )
Balance March 28, 2015 |  |  | 2,259 |
Additional provision recorded |  |  | 190 |
Net write-offs |  |  | (294 | )
Balance March 26, 2016 |  |  | 2,155 |
Additional provision recorded |  |  | 845 |
Net write-offs |  |  | (221 | )
Balance March 25, 2017 |  | $ | 2,779 |

Certain sales plans relating to customers’ use of Mayors credit cards provide for revolving lines of credit and/or installment plans under which the payment terms exceed one year. The receivables repayable within a timeframe exceeding one year included under such plans, amounted to approximately $6.4 million and $5.0 million at March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, respectively, and are included in customer trade receivables.

4. | Inventories:

Inventories, net of obsolescence reserve, are summarized as follows:

|  | As of |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Raw materials |  | $ | 3,768 |  |  | $ | 4,301 |
Work in progress |  |  | 49 |  |  |  | 95 |
Retail inventories and manufactured finished goods |  |  | 128,252 |  |  |  | 133,443 |
|  | $ | 132,069 |  |  | $ | 137,839 |

Continuity of the obsolescence reserve for inventory is as follows (in thousands):

Balance March 29, 2014 |  | $ | 2,514 |
Additional charges |  |  | 1,545 |
Deductions |  |  | (1,313 | )
Balance March 28, 2015 |  |  | 2,746 |
Additional charges |  |  | 626 |
Deductions |  |  | (1,228 | )
Balance March 26, 2016 |  |  | 2,144 |
Additional charges |  |  | 496 |
Deductions |  |  | (954 | )
Balance March 25, 2017 |  | $ | 1,686 |

F-18

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

5. | Property and equipment:

The components of property and equipment are as follows:

|  | As of |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Land |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 4,909 |
Buildings |  |  | — |  |  |  | 7,274 |
Leasehold improvements |  |  | 37,114 |  |  |  | 36,550 |
Equipment |  |  | 1,924 |  |  |  | 1,933 |
Molds |  |  | 33 |  |  |  | 838 |
Furniture and fixtures |  |  | 8,612 |  |  |  | 9,858 |
Software and electronic equipment |  |  | 21,409 |  |  |  | 19,155 |
|  |  | 69,092 |  |  |  | 80,517 |
Accumulated depreciation |  |  | (46,102 | ) |  |  | (51,098 | )
|  | $ | 22,990 |  |  | $ | 29,419 |

The Company wrote off $8.2 million of gross fixed assets that were fully amortized during the year ended March 25, 2017 (March 26, 2016 - $10.4 million), mostly related to leasehold improvements. Property and equipment, having a cost of $1.9 million and a net book value of $1.1 million at March 25, 2017, and a cost of $12.1 million and a net book value of $8.4 million at March 26, 2016, are under capital leasing arrangements.

6. | Sale of assets

On August 4, 2015, the Company sold the assets of its corporate sales division to Rideau for $4.3 million. The disposal is consistent with the Company’s long-term strategy to concentrate on its retail operations and develop its Birks product brand through its current retail network, as well as internationally through other channels, and to concentrate the Company’s resources and efforts on its core activities. On August 4, 2015, the carrying amount of the major classes of assets that were sold was comprised primarily of inventory of $0.8 million, resulting in a gain on disposal of assets in the amount of approximately $3.2 million. Furthermore, as part of the agreement, the Company will supply Rideau, with Birks-branded time pieces and jewelry and will receive ongoing royalty payments from Rideau, related to future sales of all Birks-branded products. Rideau has agreed to purchase a minimum aggregate amount of $4.5 million for the first three years, and $2.0 million per year for each contract year thereafter for a period of 7 years.

7. | Bank indebtedness:

As of March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, bank indebtedness consisted solely of the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility which had an outstanding balance of $70.4 million and $62.4 million, respectively. The senior secured revolving credit facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets. Our excess borrowing capacity, which was above $6.0 million throughout fiscal 2017, was $14.6 million as of March 25, 2017 and $16.2 million as of March 26, 2016. The Company must maintain positive excess availability.

F-19

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

In December 2016, the Company executed an amendment to the terms of its $110.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility to extend the maturity, which was set to expire on August 22, 2017. The term of the senior secured revolving credit facility now expires on the earlier to occur of (a) December 21, 2021 or (b) the date that is 91 days prior to the maturity date then in effect with respect to the senior secured term loan debt. The Company also executed an amendment to the terms of its senior secured term loan to extend the maturity from August 22, 2018 to May 21, 2021 and to reduce the senior secured term loan amount from $33.0 million to $28.0 million, with the $5.0 million reduction in the senior secured term loan borrowed under the senior secured revolving credit facility. In addition, as part of the amendments to the senior secured revolving credit facility and the senior secured term loan, the minimum excess availability levels required to be maintained by the Company has been reduced from $8.0 million to $6.0 million. The amendments to the senior secured revolving credit facility and the senior secured term loan also include a reduction to the minimum adjusted EBITDA levels and reduce the seasonal availability blocks imposed from December 20th to January 20th of each year from $12.5 million to $11.5 million and from January 21st to February 10th from $5.0 million to $4.0 million. Failure to meet the minimum adjusted EBITDA covenant in the event that availability falls below $6.0 million for any five consecutive business days is considered an event of default under the amended agreements, that could result in the outstanding balances borrowed under the Company’s senior secured term loan and senior secured revolving credit facility becoming due immediately, which would result in cross defaults on the Company’s other borrowings.

The senior secured term loan is subordinated in lien priority to the senior secured revolving credit facility. These two credit facilities are used to finance working capital and capital expenditures, provide liquidity to fund the Company’s day-to-day operations and for other general corporate purposes.

The senior secured revolving credit facility also contains limitations on the Company’s ability to pay dividends, more specifically, among other limitations, the Company can pay dividends only at certain excess borrowing capacity thresholds and the aggregate dividend payment for the twelve-month period ended as of any fiscal quarter cannot exceed 33% of the consolidated net income for such twelve-month period. Additionally, the Company is required to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.30 to 1.00 and a minimum excess availability of $30 million in order to qualify for payment of dividends. Besides these financial covenants related to paying dividends, the terms of this facility provide that no financial covenants are required to be met other than already described.

The information concerning the Company’s senior secured credit facility is as follows:

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Maximum borrowing outstanding during the year |  | $ | 83,615 |  |  | $ | 78,137 |
Average outstanding balance during the year |  | $ | 71,750 |  |  | $ | 68,205 |
Weighted average interest rate for the year |  |  | 3.2 | % |  |  | 3.2 | %
Effective interest rate at year-end |  |  | 3.0 | % |  |  | 3.3 | %

As security for the bank indebtedness, the Company has provided some of its lenders the following: (i) general assignment of all accounts receivable, other receivables and trademarks; (ii) general security agreements on all of the Company’s assets; (iii) insurance on physical assets in a minimum amount equivalent to the indebtedness, assigned to the lenders; (iv) a mortgage on moveable property (general) under the Civil Code (Québec) of $188,395,000 (CAD$250,000,000); (v) lien on machinery, equipment and molds and dies; and (vi) a pledge of trademarks and stock of the Company’s subsidiaries.

F-20

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

8. | Long-term debt:

(a) | Long-term debt consists of the following:

|  | As of |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Senior secured term loans that are subordinated in lien priority to the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility. The loan bears interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 9.75% on $28 million of debt. $5 million was repaid in December 2016. The term of the loan expires in May 2021. |  | $ | 26,952 |  |  | $ | 32,186 |
Term loan from Investissement Quebec, bearing interest at an annual rate of Canadian prime plus 7.0%, repayable beginning in October 2014 in 60 equal monthly principal payments of $62,314 (CAD$83,333), secured by the assets of the Company. The balance at March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016 was CAD$2.9 million and CAD$3.7 million, respectively (b). |  |  | 2,141 |  |  |  | 2,786 |
Term loan from Investissement Québec, bearing interest at an annual rate of Canadian prime plus 5.5%, repayable beginning in April 2012 in 48 equal monthly capital repayments of $155,786 (CAD$208,333), secured by the assets of the Company. The balance at March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016 was CAD$1.0 million and CAD$3.1 million, respectively (b). |  |  | 779 |  |  |  | 2,355 |
Term loan from Investissement Québec, bearing interest at an annual rate of Canadian prime plus 10%, repayable beginning in August 2015 in 48 equal monthly principal payment of $31,157 (CAD$41,667), secured by the assets of the Company. The balance at March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016 was CAD$1.4 million and 1.8 million respectively (b) |  |  | 1,061 |  |  |  | 1,383 |
Obligations under capital leases, at annual interest rates between 3.6% and 14.9%, secured by leasehold improvements, furniture, and equipment, maturing at various dates to March 2021. |  |  | 902 |  |  |  | 1,719 |
Cash advance provided by the Company’s controlling shareholder, Montrovest, bearing interest at an annual rate of 11%, net of withholding taxes (note 16(c)) |  |  | 1,500 |  |  |  | 1,500 |
Senior secured term loan that is subordinated in lien priority to the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility. The loan bore interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 9.75%. The loan was repaid in May 2016. |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,215 |
Obligation under capital lease on land and building, pursuant to a sale-leaseback transaction. This obligation was terminated in November 2016 upon the sale of the Montreal head-office building. The balance at March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016 was nil and CAD$12.1 million, respectively (f). |  |  | — |  |  |  | 9,141 |
|  |  | 33,335 |  |  |  | 52,285 |
Current portion of long-term debt |  |  | 2,810 |  |  |  | 5,634 |
|  | $ | 30,525 |  |  | $ | 46,651 |

(b) | In November 2015, the Company amended the monthly capital requirements amounts of all term loans with Investissement Québec in order to reduce its short-term capital requirements. The impact of the amendment on the first twelve months following the effective date of the amendment translates to a reduction of CAD$2 million (approximately $1.5 million in U.S. dollars) of the monthly capital requirements. This amendment was agreed to by the senior secured lenders.

The term loans with Investissement Québec require the Company on an annual basis to have a working capital ratio of at least 1.15. Up until October 28, 2016, Investissement Québec also required the Company to maintain an adjusted long-term debt to adjusted net assets ratio below 2.5 on an annual basis, at which date Investissement Québec removed this covenant. On each of June 26, 2015 and March 7, 2016, the Company obtained a waiver from Investissement Québec with respect to the requirement to meet the adjusted long-term debt to adjusted net assets ratio for fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, respectively. The Company was in compliance with the working capital ratio as of March 25, 2017.

F-21

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

(c) | Future minimum lease payments for capital leases required in the following five years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):

Year ending March: |  |  |  |
2018 |  | $ | 592 |
2019 |  |  | 125 |
2020 |  |  | 92 |
2021 |  |  | 92 |
2022 |  |  | 67 |
Thereafter |  |  | — |
|  |  | 968 |
Less imputed interest |  |  | 66 |
|  | $ | 902 |

(d) | Principal payments on long-term debt required in the following five years and thereafter, including obligations under capital leases, are as follows (in thousands):

Year ending March: |  |  |  |
2018 |  | $ | 2,810 |
2019 |  |  | 1,191 |
2020 |  |  | 712 |
2021 |  |  | 27,057 |
2022 |  |  | 65 |
Thereafter |  |  | 1,500 |
|  | $ | 33,335 |

(e) | As of March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, the Company had $0.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of outstanding letters of credit which were provided to certain lenders.

(f) | In December 2000, the Company entered into a capital lease agreement for the Company’s Montreal head office and store pursuant to which the Company sold and leased back the building, including the Montreal flagship store, for a term of 20 years ending December 11, 2020. The net annual rental rate was CAD$2.2 million (approximately $1.6 million U.S. dollars) for the period that ended on December 11, 2016. On November 1, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with the new owner of the building to terminate the existing lease agreement for the building in advance of its expiry date in December 2020 and to lease the premises for the Company’s flagship store at its current location, which is an operating lease. As a result, a capital lease asset of CAD $8.7 million (approximately $6.5 million in U.S. dollars) and a capital lease obligation of CAD $11.6 million (approximately $8.7 million in U.S. dollars) at November 1, 2016 were derecognized and a non-cash gain of CAD $2.9 million (approximately $2.2 million in U.S. dollars) (included as part of other long-term liabilities) is being deferred and amortized over the term of the new lease of the flagship store.

9. | Benefit plans and stock-based compensation:

(a) | Stock option plans and arrangements:

| (i) | The Company can issue stock options, SARs, deferred share units and restricted stock units to executive management, key employees and directors under the following stock-based compensation plans.

The Company has a Long-Term Incentive Plan under which awards may be made in order to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional incentive to employees and to promote the success of the Company. Any employee or consultant selected by the administrator is eligible for any type of award provided for under the Long-Term Incentive Plan, except

F-22

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

that incentive stock options may not be granted to consultants. The Long-Term Incentive Plan provided for the grant of units and performance units or share awards. As of March 25, 2017, there were 128,000 cash-based stock appreciation rights that were exercisable under the Long-Term Incentive Plan. The stock appreciation rights outstanding under the Long-Term Incentive Plan have a weighted average exercise price of $1.33. As of March 25, 2017, there were stock options to purchase 650,000 Class A voting shares outstanding under the Long-Term Incentive Plan. During fiscal 2017 no stock options were issued under the Long-Term Incentive Plan. During fiscal 2016, stock options to purchase 235,000 shares of the Company’s Class A voting shares were issued with a three year vesting period, with an average exercise price of $0.78, and an expiration date of 10 years after the grant date. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of the options granted during fiscal 2016 was $0.69. The fair value of the newly issued options in fiscal 2016 was calculated as of the date of their grant, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: Dividend yield – 0%; Expected volatility – 95.3%; Risk-free interest rate – 2.3%; and expected term in years – 10 years. The outstanding options as of March 25, 2017 had no intrinsic value. The unrecognized compensation related to the non-vested portion of stock options granted as of March 25, 2017 was $46,000. Total compensation cost for options recognized in expenses was $92,000, $109,000 and $76,000 during fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. This plan expired in February 2016 and no further awards will be granted under this plan. However, the Long-Term Incentive Plan will remain in effect until the outstanding awards issued under the plan terminate or expire by their terms.

On August 15, 2016, the Board of Directors adopted the Company’s Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus LTIP”), and same was approved by the Company’s shareholders on September 21, 2016. Further to the Omnibus LTIP, the Company’s directors, officers, senior executives and other employees of the Company or one of its subsidiaries, consultants and service providers providing ongoing services to the Company and its affiliates may from time-to-time be granted various types of compensation awards, as same are further described below. The Omnibus LTIP is meant to replace the Company’s former equity awards plans. A total of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Class A voting shares are reserved for issuance under the Omnibus LTIP. In no event shall the Company issue Class A voting shares, or awards requiring the Company to issue Class A voting shares, pursuant to the Omnibus LTIP if such issuance, when combined with the Class A voting shares issuable upon the exercise of awards granted under the Company’s former plan or any other equity awards plan of the Company, would exceed 1,796,088 Class A voting shares, unless such issuance of Class A voting shares or awards is approved by the shareholders of the Company. This limit shall not restrict however, the Company’s ability to issue awards under the Omnibus LTIP that are payable other than in shares. As of March 25, 2017, there were stock options to purchase 218,000 Class A voting shares outstanding under the Omnibus LTIP, all of which were issued during fiscal 2017, with a three year vesting period, with an average exercise price of $1.43 and an expiration date of 10 years after the grant date. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of the options granted during fiscal 2017 was $1.34. The fair value of the newly issued options in fiscal 2017 was calculated as of the date of their grant, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: Dividend yield – 0%; Expected volatility – 114.63%; Risk-free interest rate –2.2%; and expected term in years – 10 years. The outstanding options as of March 25, 2017 had no intrinsic value. The unrecognized compensation related to the non-vested portion of stock options granted as of March 25, 2017 was $225,000. Total compensation cost for options recognized in expenses was $65,000 during fiscal 2017.

F-23

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

The Company has outstanding employee stock options issued under the Birks Employee Stock Option Plan (the “Birks ESOP”). Effective November 15, 2005, no awards are permitted to be granted under the Birks ESOP. However, the Birks ESOP will remain in effect until the outstanding awards issued under the plan terminate or expire by their terms. In March 2010, the Company offered employees who held options under this plan the right to amend their current options. The amended options terms would be consistent with the original grant except that the new options would have a lower exercise price, be exercisable for a lesser number of the Company’s Class A voting shares, have a new ten-year term and be subject to different terms in the event of a change in control or if the Company had a going-private transaction. The amended options have an exercise price of $1.05 per share. As of March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015 there were 6,162, 6,162 and 6,162 Class A voting shares underlying options granted under the Birks ESOP, respectively. No compensation expense was required to be recorded related to the amended option transaction and no compensation expense was required to be recorded for the outstanding option under this plan for the years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015.

The following is a summary of the activity of Birks’ stock option plans and arrangements.

|  | Options |  |  | Weighted average exercise price |
Outstanding March 29, 2014 |  |  | 664,585 |  |  | $ | 1.21 |
Granted |  |  | 50,000 |  |  |  | 1.94 |
Exercised |  |  | (111,372 | ) |  |  | 1.04 |
Expired |  |  | (15,000 | ) |  |  | 7.73 |
Forfeited |  |  | (147,051 | ) |  |  | 1.10 |
Outstanding March 28, 2015 |  |  | 441,162 |  |  |  | 1.15 |
Granted |  |  | 235,000 |  |  |  | 0.78 |
Forfeited |  |  | (10,000 | ) |  |  | 1.10 |
Outstanding March 26, 2016 |  |  | 666,162 |  |  |  | 1.02 |
Granted |  |  | 218,000 |  |  |  | 1.43 |
Forfeited |  |  | (10,000 | ) |  |  | 0.78 |
Outstanding March 25, 2017 |  |  | 874,162 |  |  | $ | 1.13 |

A summary of the status of Birks’ stock options at March 25, 2017 is presented below:

|  |  | Options outstanding |  |  | Options exercisable |
Exercise price |  |  | Number outstanding |  |  | Weighted average remaining life (years) |  |  | Weighted average exercise price |  |  | Number exercisable |  |  | Weighted average exercise price |
$ | 0.78 |  |  |  | 225,000 |  |  |  | 8.5 |  |  | $ | 0.78 |  |  |  | 74,996 |  |  | $ | — |
$ | 0.84 |  |  |  | 100,000 |  |  |  | 6.1 |  |  |  | 0.84 |  |  |  | 100,000 |  |  |  | 0.84 |
$ | 0.89 |  |  |  | 55,000 |  |  |  | 5.6 |  |  |  | 0.89 |  |  |  | 55,000 |  |  |  | 0.89 |
$ | 1.04-1.05 |  |  |  | 156,162 |  |  |  | 4.7 |  |  |  | 1.04 |  |  |  | 156,162 |  |  |  | 1.04 |
$ | 1.25-1.66 |  |  |  | 70,000 |  |  |  | 5.2 |  |  |  | 1.48 |  |  |  | 70,000 |  |  |  | 1.48 |
$ | 1.43 |  |  |  | 218,000 |  |  |  | 9.7 |  |  |  | 1.43 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
$ | 1.94 |  |  |  | 50,000 |  |  |  | 7.8 |  |  |  | 1.94 |  |  |  | 33,333 |  |  |  | 1.94 |
|  |  |  |  | 874,162 |  |  |  | 8.2 |  |  | $ | 1.13 |  |  |  | 489,491 |  |  | $ | 1.07 |

| (ii) | Under plans approved by the former Board of Directors of Mayors, the Company has outstanding stock options issued to employees and members of the Company’s Board of Directors. No further awards will be granted under these plans. As of March 25, 2017, there are 627 options outstanding with a weighted average remaining estimated life of 4 years. No compensation expense was required to be recorded related to the options outstanding under this program for the years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015, respectively.

F-24

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

The following is a summary of the activity of Mayors stock option plans:

|  | Options |  |  | Weighted average exercise price |
Outstanding March 29, 2014 |  |  | 3,836 |  |  | $ | 5.19 |
Expired |  |  | (2,910 | ) |  |  | 6.51 |
Outstanding March 28, 2015 |  |  | 926 |  |  |  | 1.05 |
Expired |  |  | (299 | ) |  |  | 1.05 |
Outstanding March 26, 2016 and March 25, 2017 |  |  | 627 |  |  |  | 1.05 |

A summary of the status of the option plans at March 25, 2017 is presented below:

Exercise price |  |  |  |  |  | Options outstanding and exercisable |
| Number outstanding |  |  | Weighted average remaining life (years) |  |  | Weighted average exercise price |
$ | 1.05 |  |  |  | 627 |  |  |  | 3.1 |  |  | $ | 1.05 |

| (iii) | The Company issues new shares to satisfy share-based awards and exercise of stock options. During fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, no cash was used to settle equity instruments granted under share-based payment arrangements.

(b) | As of March 25, 2017, the Company had outstanding warrants exercisable into 382,693 shares of the Company’s Class A voting shares. These warrants have a weighted average exercise price of $3.42 per share and expire on August 20, 2022. As of November 1, 2005, these awards were fully vested and no additional compensation expense will be recognized.

(c) | Restricted stock units and deferred share unit plans:

On November 15, 2016, the Company issued 121,500 cash settled restricted stock units (RSU) to members of senior management under the Omnibus LTIP. These units vest after three years and expire one month following the vesting date.. The Company also issued 55,944 cash settled deferred share units (DSU) to members of the board of directors. These units vest immediately upon the date the member ceases being a director and expire on December 31 of the following year. Compensation expense is recognized using the fair market value at the date of grant and recorded rateably over the vesting period. The liability will be re-measured over the vesting period. As at March 25, 2017, the Company has recognized a liability and compensation expense of $34,000 in relation to these units.

(d) | Employee stock purchase plan:

The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) that permits eligible employees, which does not include executives of the Company, to purchase the Company’s Class A voting stock at 85% of the Class A voting shares fair market value through regular payroll deductions. A total of 100,000 shares of the Company’s Class A voting shares are reserved for issuance under the ESPP. As of March 25, 2017, 99,995 Class A voting shares were outstanding under the ESPP and no additional shares will be issued under this plan.

No shares were issued under the ESPP in fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015.

(e) | Profit sharing plan:

Mayors has a 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan & Trust (the “Plan”), which permits eligible employees to make contributions to the Plan on a pretax salary reduction basis in accordance with the provisions of Section 401(k)

F-25

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

of the Internal Revenue Code. Mayors historically made cash contributions of 25% of the employee’s pretax contribution, up to 4% of Mayors employee’s compensation, in any calendar year. Effective January 1, 2009, the Company exercised its right to cancel all future matching contributions to the Plan and as such, no additional matching cash payments were made to the Plan during fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015.

(f) | CEO and Senior Executive Long-Term Cash Incentive Plans:

During the year ended March 30, 2013, the Board of Directors approved the long-term cash incentive plans (“LTCIPs”) for the Chief Executive Officer and certain executive officers. The intention of the LTCIPs was to reward the Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior management based on the performance of the Company over three-year cycles, the first of which began with the fiscal 2013 through fiscal 2015 period. The approval of a new three-year cycle was at the discretion of the Board of Directors on recommendation of the compensation committee. The payouts under the LTCIPs was to be based on the earnings before taxes (“EBT”) performance of the Company with the payout level earned during the three-year period either increasing or decreasing based on the Company’s EBT performance levels versus thresholds established in each of the three years of the three-year cycle and afterwards, if the LTCIPs were continued. The Company was to pay out a third of the LTCIPs value earned at the end of the first three year cycle and a third of the LTCIPs value for every year thereafter, subject to the Chief Executive Officer and participating executives continued employment and subject to the payment not causing any default on the Company’s credit facilities. The LTCIPs payouts will continue to rise or fall based on the Company’s performance each year. The total LTCIPs pool was only created to compensate if EBT was above a certain growth rate and the payout was capped so that the total three-year costs of the programs combined did not exceed 10% of the Company’s total earnings before taxes for the three-year period.

Participation in the first three-year cycle was limited to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its two Senior Executives. The target incentive compensation level for the fiscal 2013 to 2015 LTCIPs cycle was $2,067,000 with a total payout capped at 200 percent above this targeted incentive compensation level irrespective of the earnings before taxes generated above these levels by the Company.

The Company did not meet the EBT threshold established by the plan and accordingly, no liability or expense related to this plan was recorded and no new three-year cycles have been approved by the Board of Directors related to this plan.

F-26

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

(g) | CEO Long-term Cash Incentive Plan:

In April 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a long-term cash incentive plan for the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO LTCIP”). The intention of the CEO LTCIP is to reward the Chief Executive Officer based on the Company’s performance over three-year cycles, the first of which begins with the fiscal 2016 through fiscal 2018 period. The approval of this three-year cycle is at the discretion of the Board of Directors on recommendation of the Compensation Committee. The CEO LTCIP is structured to fund a pool of dollars based on the successful achievement of earnings before tax (“EBT”) and the level of achievement of three key metrics that can modify the amount achieved based on EBT over three one-year periods. The amount of money funded each year, if earned, is added together at the end of the three-year cycle (with each year comprising one third of the total payout opportunity). Fifty percent (50%) of the final value of the pool following completion of the three year cycle is payable at the end of the three year cycle (early fiscal year 2019). with the remaining 50% payable one year thereafter (early fiscal 2020) subject to the Chief Executive Officer remaining employed at the time of payout and the payout not causing any default under our senior secured credit facilities. As of March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, no amounts were earned under the CEO LTCIP.

10. | Income taxes:

(a) | The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of March 25, 2017, the Company had no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions due to available tax loss carry forwards. The tax years 2011 through 2017 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.

The Company evaluates its deferred tax assets to determine if any adjustments to its valuation allowances are required. As part of this analysis, the Company could not reach the required conclusion that it would be able to more likely than not realize the value of both its U.S. and Canadian net deferred tax assets in the future. As a result, the Company has a non-cash valuation allowance of $53.3 million against the majority of the Company’s net deferred tax assets.

In fiscal 2017, the Company reversed a net valuation allowance of $5.3 million related to Mayors on the basis of management’s reassessment of the amount of deferred tax assets that are more likely than not to be realized in the foreseeable future (1 to 3 years).

As of each reporting date, management considers new evidence, both positive and negative, that could affect its view of the future realization of deferred tax assets. As of March 25, 2017 Mayors has three years of cumulative pre-tax income in the U.S. federal tax jurisdiction, as well as other positive indicators, and the Company determined that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that it is more likely than not that deferred income taxes of $5.3 million are realizable in the foreseeable future. It therefore reduced the valuation allowance accordingly.

F-27

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

The significant items comprising the Company’s net deferred tax assets at March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016 are as follows:

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Deferred tax assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Loss and tax credit carry forwards |  | $ | 44,296 |  |  | $ | 39,710 |
Difference between book and tax basis of property and equipment |  |  | 4,951 |  |  |  | 2,731 |
Interest expense limitations carry forward |  |  | 7,190 |  |  |  | 10,697 |
Inventory allowances |  |  | 383 |  |  |  | 417 |
Other reserves not currently deductible |  |  | 1,045 |  |  |  | 807 |
Capital lease obligation |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,431 |
Expenses not currently deductible |  |  | 776 |  |  |  | 667 |
Other |  |  | (27 | ) |  |  | (175 | )
Net deferred tax asset before valuation allowance |  |  | 58,614 |  |  |  | 57,285 |
Valuation allowance |  |  | (53,311 | ) |  |  | (57,285 | )
Net deferred tax asset |  | $ | 5,303 |  |  | $ | — |

The Company’s income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following components:

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Income tax expense (benefit): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current |  | $ | 26 |  |  | $ | 50 |  |  | $ | 77 |
Deferred |  |  | 550 |  |  |  | 1,591 |  |  |  | (2,636 | )
Valuation allowance |  |  | (5,853 | ) |  |  | (1,591 | ) |  |  | 2,559 |
Income tax expense |  | $ | (5,277 | ) |  | $ | 50 |  |  | $ | — |

The Company’s current tax payable at March 25, 2017 was $(140,000), $35,000 for March 26, 2016, and nil for March 28, 2015.

The Company’s provision for income taxes varies from the amount computed by applying the statutory income tax rates for the reasons summarized below:

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
Canadian statutory rate |  | $ | (93 | ) |  | $ | 1,460 |  |  | $ | (2,275 | )
Rate differential for U.S. operations |  |  | 545 |  |  |  | 358 |  |  |  | (443 | )
Utilization of unrecognized losses and other tax attributes |  |  | (7,404 | ) |  |  | (1,768 | ) |  |  | — |
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets |  |  | 1,538 |  |  |  | 177 |  |  |  | 2,636 |
Permanent differences and other |  |  | 137 |  |  |  | (177 | ) |  |  | 82 |
Total |  | $ | (5,277 | ) |  | $ | 50 |  |  | $ | — |

F-28

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

(b) | At March 25, 2017, the Company had federal non-capital losses of CAD$24.5 million ($18.3 million in U.S. dollars) available to reduce future Canadian federal taxable income and investment tax credits (“ITC’s”) in Canada of CAD$260,000 ($194,000 in U.S. dollars) available to reduce future Canadian federal income taxes payable which will expire between 2023 and 2036.

(c) | As of March 25, 2017, Mayors and another of the Company’s US subsidiary have federal and state net operating loss carry forwards in the U.S. of approximately $106 million and $92.2 million, respectively. Due to Section 382 limitations from the change in ownership for the year ended March 29, 2003, the utilization of approximately $35.3 million of the pre-acquisition net operating loss carry forwards is limited to approximately $953,000 on an annual basis through 2022. The federal net operating loss carry forwards expire beginning in fiscal 2020 through fiscal 2034 and the state net operating loss carry forwards expire beginning in fiscal 2018 through fiscal 2034. Mayors also has an alternative minimum tax credit carry forward of approximately $1.1 million to offset future federal income taxes.

11. | Capital stock:

Authorized capital stock of the Company consists of an unlimited number of no par value preferred shares and two classes of common stock outstanding: Class A and Class B. Class A voting shares receive one vote per share. The Class B multiple voting shares have substantially the same rights as the Class A voting shares except that each share of Class B multiple voting shares receives 10 votes per share. The issued and outstanding shares are as follows:

|  | Class A common stock |  |  | Class B common stock |  |  | Total common stock |
|  | Number of Shares |  |  | Amount |  |  | Number of Shares |  |  | Amount |  |  | Number of Shares |  |  | Amount |
Balance as of March 28, 2015 |  |  | 10,242,911 |  |  | $ | 30,988 |  |  |  | 7,717,970 |  |  | $ | 38,613 |  |  |  | 17,960,881 |  |  | $ | 69,601 |
Exercise of stock options |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Balance as of March 26, 2016 |  |  | 10,242,911 |  |  | $ | 30,988 |  |  |  | 7,717,970 |  |  | $ | 38,613 |  |  |  | 17,960,881 |  |  | $ | 69,601 |
Exercise of stock options |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Balance as of March 25, 2017 |  |  | 10,242,911 |  |  | $ | 30,988 |  |  |  | 7,717,970 |  |  | $ | 38,613 |  |  |  | 17,960,881 |  |  | $ | 69,601 |

12. | Restructuring Charges:

In July 2014, the Company provided to its senior secured lenders and announced an operational restructuring plan to reduce corporate overhead costs, improve profitability and drive efficiency within the organization. The restructuring plan included consolidating most of its corporate administrative workforce from its regional office in Tamarac, Florida to its Montreal corporate head office as well as the outsourcing of a portion of the Company’s jewelry manufacturing and other corporate office staff reductions. In February 2017, the Company began the second phase of the operational restructuring plan, incurring restructuring charges of approximately $0.8 million in fiscal 2017 primarily associated with severance, as the Company eliminated certain corporate administrative positions to further increase efficiency. During fiscal 2016, the Company recorded $0.8 million of restructuring charges. These charges were primarily associated with severance and temporary duplication of salaries during the transition of positions from Tamarac to Montreal. During fiscal 2015, the Company recorded $2.6 million of restructuring charges. These charges included $1.4 million of severance and employee retention related charges and $0.6 million of transition-related charges associated with the consolidation of positions to Montreal including temporary duplication of salaries during the transition, recruitment costs for positions

F-29

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

transferred to Montreal and travel and relocation costs. Restructuring charges also included the recording of a $0.5 million loss on the sublet of a portion of the Tamarac facility and $0.1 million of commission costs associated with the sublease agreement. As of March 25, 2017, accounts payable and accrued liabilities related to these restructuring charges were nil (March 26, 2016 - $0.3 million) and cash paid during fiscal 2017 for such charges was $0.8 million (fiscal 2016 - $1.8 million).

13. | Commitments:

Operating leases:

The Company leases all of its retail stores under operating leases. The rental costs are based on minimum annual rentals and for some of the stores, a percentage of sales. Such percentage of sales varies by location. In addition, most leases are subject to annual adjustments for increases in real estate taxes and common area maintenance costs. The Company also has operating leases for certain equipment.

Future minimum lease payments for the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):

Year ending March: |
2018 |  | $ | 14,924 |
2019 |  |  | 14,515 |
2020 |  |  | 14,221 |
2021 |  |  | 12,674 |
2022 |  |  | 12,145 |
Thereafter |  |  | 42,799 |
|  | $ | 111,278 |

Rent expense for the Company was approximately $23.2 million, including $0.8 million of contingent rent for the year ended March 25, 2017, $21.8 million, including $0.5 million of contingent rent for the year ended March 26, 2016 and $23.4 million, including $0.7 million of contingent rent for the year ended March 28, 2015.

14. | Contingencies:

(a) | The Company and its subsidiaries, in the normal course of business, become involved from time to time in litigations and claims. While the final outcome with respect to claims and legal proceedings pending at March 25, 2017 cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that adequate provisions have been recorded in the accounts where required and that the financial impact, if any, from claims related to normal business activities will not be material.

(b) | From time to time, the Company guarantees a portion of its private label credit card sales to its credit card vendor. At March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, the amount guaranteed under such arrangements was approximately $8.4 million and $9.3 million, respectively. At March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, the Company has recorded in accrued liabilities a reserve of $0.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively, associated with this guaranteed amount.

15. | Segmented information:

The Company has two reportable segments Retail and Other. As of March 25, 2017, Retail operated 26 stores across Canada under the Birks brand, and 17 stores in the Southeastern U.S. under the Mayors brand, 1 store under the Rolex brand name in Orlando, as well as 2 retail locations in Calgary and Vancouver under the Brinkhaus brand. Other consists primarily of our e-commerce business, gold exchange business, which purchases gold and other precious metals from clients and refines the metals purchased, wholesale business and until August 2015 the corporate sales division which was sold.

F-30

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

The two segments are managed and evaluated separately based on gross profit. The accounting policies used for each of the segments are the same as those used for the consolidated financial statements. Inter-segment sales are made at amounts of consideration agreed upon between the two segments and intercompany profit is eliminated if not yet earned on a consolidated basis. The Company does not evaluate the performance of the Company’s assets on a segment basis for internal management reporting and, therefore, such information is not presented.

Certain information relating to the Company’s segments for the years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015, respectively, is set forth below:

|  | Retail |  |  | Other |  |  | Total |
|  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |  |  | 2015 |  |  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |  |  | 2015 |  |  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Sales to external customers |  | $ | 283,807 |  |  | $ | 281,940 |  |  | $ | 293,146 |  |  | $ | 3,114 |  |  | $ | 3,886 |  |  | $ | 8,491 |  |  | $ | 286,921 |  |  | $ | 285,826 |  |  | $ | 301,637 |
Inter-segment sales |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 13,586 |  |  |  | 14,002 |  |  |  | 15,891 |  |  |  | 13,586 |  |  |  | 14,002 |  |  |  | 15,891 |
Unadjusted Gross profit |  |  | 108,487 |  |  |  | 110,023 |  |  |  | 118,128 |  |  |  | 1,062 |  |  |  | 2,691 |  |  |  | 5,390 |  |  |  | 109,549 |  |  |  | 112,714 |  |  |  | 123,518 |

The following sets forth reconciliations of the segments’ gross profits and certain unallocated costs to the Company’s consolidated gross profits for the years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015:

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Unadjusted gross profit |  | $ | 109,549 |  |  | $ | 112,714 |  |  | $ | 123,518 |
Inventory provisions |  |  | (1,250 | ) |  |  | (2,084 | ) |  |  | (3,151 | )
Other unallocated costs |  |  | (177 | ) |  |  | (1,630 | ) |  |  | (2,551 | )
Adjustment of intercompany profit |  |  | 312 |  |  |  | 387 |  |  |  | (11 | )
Gross profit |  | $ | 108,434 |  |  | $ | 109,387 |  |  | $ | 117,805 |

F-31

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

Sales to external customers and long-lived assets by geographical areas were as follows:

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Geographic Areas |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net sales: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Canada |  | $ | 116,436 |  |  | $ | 128,651 |  |  | $ | 143,384 |
United States |  |  | 170,485 |  |  |  | 157,175 |  |  |  | 158,253 |
|  | $ | 286,921 |  |  | $ | 285,826 |  |  | $ | 301,637 |
Long-lived assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Canada |  | $ | 13,921 |  |  | $ | 18,610 |  |  | $ | 17,072 |
United States |  |  | 9,259 |  |  |  | 11,302 |  |  |  | 11,957 |
|  | $ | 23,180 |  |  | $ | 29,912 |  |  | $ | 29,029 |
Classes of Similar Products |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net sales: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Jewelry and other |  | $ | 122,405 |  |  | $ | 127,220 |  |  | $ | 141,781 |
Timepieces |  |  | 164,516 |  |  |  | 158,606 |  |  |  | 159,856 |
|  | $ | 286,921 |  |  | $ | 285,826 |  |  | $ | 301,637 |

16. | Related party transactions:

(a) | The Company is party to certain related party transactions. Balances related to these related parties are disclosed in the consolidated financial statements except the following:

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | March 25, 2017 |  |  | March 26, 2016 |  |  | March 28, 2015 |
|  | (In thousands) |
Transactions: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Purchases of inventory from supplier related to shareholder (d) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 503 |  |  | $ | 189 |
Management fees to related parties (b) |  |  | 154 |  |  |  | 155 |  |  |  | 238 |
Consultant fees to a related party (e) |  |  | 150 |  |  |  | 173 |  |  |  | 175 |
Expense reimbursement to a related party (f) |  |  | 178 |  |  |  | 201 |  |  |  | 241 |
Interest expense on cash advance received from controlling shareholder (c) |  |  | 165 |  |  |  | 165 |  |  |  | 165 |
Compensation paid to a related party (h) |  |  | 67 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 136 |
Balances: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable to supplier related to shareholder (d) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | — |
Accounts payable to related parties |  |  | 57 |  |  |  | 38 |  |  |  | 447 |
Interest payable on cash advance received from controlling shareholder |  |  | 24 |  |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | 136 |

(b) | On June 8, 2011, the Board of Directors approved the Company entering into a Management Consulting Service Agreement with Montrovest. Under the agreement, the Company paid Montrovest an annual retainer fee of €140,000 in exchange for services related to the raising of capital for international expansion projects and such other services relating to merchandising and/or marketing of the Company’s products as the Company may request. The agreement was in effect until June 8, 2012 and was extended automatically for successive terms of

F-32

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

| one year unless either party gave a 60 days’ notice of its intention not to renew. The yearly renewal of the agreement is subject to the review and approval of the Company’s Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors. In fiscal 2017, fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, the Company paid nil, €105,000 and €140,000 respectively (approximately nil, $116,000 and $178,000 in U.S. dollars, respectively), under this agreement to Montrovest. In April 2015, the agreement was renewed for an additional one-year term ending June 8, 2016. The Company’s Board of Directors approved entering into the agreement and its renewal with Montrovest in accordance with the Company’s Code of Conduct relating to related party transactions. In February 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the reimbursement to Montrovest of legal fees incurred by Montrovest in connection with the issuance of the $5.0 million LC for the benefit of the Company up to a total amount of CAD$75,000 (approximately $60,000 in U.S. dollars). Mr. Coda Nunziante, the Company’s Vice President, Strategy was a managing director of Montrovest until June 30, 2012. Mr. Davide Barberis Canonico, one of our directors, is a member of the Supervisory Board of Directors of Montrovest. On November 17, 2015, our Board of Directors approved the termination of the Management Consulting Services Agreement with Montrovest effective December 31, 2015 and the entering into the Management Consulting Services Agreement with Gestofi S.A. (“Gestofi”) effective January 1, 2016 on the same terms and conditions as the agreement with Montrovest, all in accordance with the Company’s Code of Conduct relating to related party transactions. In fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, €140,000 and €35,000 respectively (approximately $154,000 and $39,000 in U.S. dollars) was paid to Gestofi under this agreement.

(c) | In February 2009 and May 2009, the Company received a $2.0 million and a $3.0 million, respectively, cash advance from its controlling shareholder, Montrovest, to finance working capital needs and for general corporate purposes. These advances and any interest thereon are subordinated to the indebtedness of the Company’s existing senior credit facilities and secured term loans and were convertible into a convertible debenture or Class A voting shares in the event of a private placement or repayable upon demand by Montrovest once conditions stipulated in the Company’s senior credit facilities permit such a payment. The cash advance bore interest at an annual rate of 16%, net of any withholding taxes, representing an effective interest rate of approximately 17.8%. If converted into convertible debentures or Class A voting shares, a fee of 7% of the outstanding principal amount of the cash advance would have been paid to Montrovest. In June 2011, the Company amended its cash advance agreements with Montrovest. Under the terms of the amended agreements, the annual interest rate on the $5.0 million in cash advances outstanding was reduced from 16%, net of withholding taxes to 11%, net of withholding taxes representing an effective interest rate of approximately 12.2%. The amended agreements eliminated the convertibility of the cash advances into convertible debentures or Class A voting shares in the event of a private placement and also eliminated the payment of a 7% fee if the debt was converted into convertible debentures or Class A voting shares. The Company also amended its management subordination agreement with Montrovest and its senior lenders, eliminating the payment of any success fee to Montrovest if the Company receives net cash proceeds of $5 million or more related to an equity issuance. The Company paid a one-time fee of $75,000 to Montrovest associated with the amendment of the cash advance agreements. In August 2012, a partial repayment of $3.5 million was made on these cash advances. At March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, advances payable to the Company’s controlling shareholder, Montrovest, amounted to $1.5 million.

(d) | In August 2002, the Company entered into a Diamond Inventory Supply Agreement with Prime Investments S.A. and a series of conditional sale agreements with companies affiliated with Prime Investments S.A. pursuant to which Prime Investments S.A. or a related party is entitled to supply Birks and its subsidiaries or affiliates with at least 45%, on an annualized cost basis, of such company’s aggregate loose diamond requirements, conditional upon the prices remaining competitive relative to market and needs in terms of quality, cut standards and specifications being satisfied. During fiscal 2017, the Company purchased

F-33

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

| approximately nil ($0.5 million in fiscal 2016, $0.2 million in fiscal 2015 and nil in fiscal 2014), of diamonds from Prime Investments S.A. and related parties. As of March 26, 2016, Asiya Trust, as trustee of Beech Settlement Trust, which is the ultimate beneficial owner of Prime Investments S.A., owned 15.0% of the Company’s outstanding Class A voting shares. During fiscal 2017, Asiya Trust disposed of their shares to third parties.

(e) | On June 30, 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Company entering into a consulting services agreement with Gestofi S.A. (“Gestofi”) in accordance with the Company’s Code of Conduct relating to related party transactions. Under the agreement, Gestofi undertook to assign Mr. Niccolò Rossi di Montelera as the employee of Gestofi responsible for providing the consulting services. The consulting services relate to providing advice and assistance in (i) new product development and product brand collection assortment, (ii), strategic and business development projects and financial matters, (iii) the implementation of the Company’s strategy and planning, and (iv) such other services reasonably requested by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer or Chairman (collectively, the “Consulting Services”). The initial one-year term of the agreement began on August 1, 2009, and the agreement may be renewed for additional one-year terms. The agreement has been renewed yearly. The Consulting Services, prior to June 2014, were provided to the Company for a fee of approximately CAD$13,700 ($10,324 in U.S. dollars) per month less any applicable taxes plus out of pocket expenses. In June 2014, upon the renewal of the agreement for an additional one-year term, the monthly fee changed to 13,000 Swiss francs ($13,310 in U.S. dollars) per month. In February 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the payment of an annual fee of $12,500 to Gestofi for services it provided in connection with the issuance of the Montrovest LC for the benefit of the Company. Mr. Niccolò Rossi di Montelera is a member of the Board of Directors and the son of Dr. Lorenzo Rossi di Montelera, Birks Group’s former Chairman and a director and chairman of the board of Gestofi. On August 1, 2015 an amended and restated consulting agreement was entered into on substantially the same terms and conditions until July 31, 2016. In June 2016, the agreement was renewed for an additional one-year term. The amended and restated consulting agreement as it relates to the consulting services provided by Mr. Niccolò Rossi di Montelera was terminated effective December 31, 2016 as a result of his appointment as Executive Chairman of the Board.

Additionally, the Company also entered into a consulting services agreement with Gestofi for the services of Dr. Lorenzo Rossi di Montelera, Birks Group’s former Chairman and a director and chairman of the board of Gestofi. The agreement expires in September 2017. In fiscal 2017, the Company paid $16,666 in relation to this agreement.

(f) | In accordance with the Company’s Code of Conduct related to related party transactions, in April 2011, the Corporate Governance Committee and Board of Directors approved the reimbursement of expenses to Regaluxe S.R.L., such as rent, communication, administrative support and analytical service costs, incurred in supporting the office of Dr. Lorenzo Rossi di Montelera, the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors, and of Mr. Niccolò Rossi di Montelera, the Chairman of the Company’s Executive Committee, for work performed on behalf of the Company, up to a yearly maximum of $250,000. The yearly maximum was increased to $260,000 in fiscal 2014. During fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company paid $178,000, $201,000 and $241,000, respectively, to Regaluxe under this agreement, respectively. This agreement was renewed in March 2017 for an additional one year term.

(h) | Effective January 1, 2017, the Company agreed to total annual compensation of €250,000 with Mr. Niccolò Rossi di Montelera in connection with his appointment as Executive Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Executive Committee. In fiscal 2017, the Company paid $67,000 in connection with this agreement.

F-34

##### Table of Contents

BIRKS GROUP INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015

17. | Financial instruments:

(a) | Concentrations:

During the years ended March 25, 2017, March 26, 2016, and March 28, 2015, approximately 42%, 39% and 36%, respectively, of consolidated sales were of merchandise purchased from the Company’s largest supplier.

(b) | Fair value of financial instruments:

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. U.S. GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. U.S. GAAP prescribes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 inputs are considered to carry the most weight within the fair value hierarchy due to the low levels of judgment required in determining fair values.

Level 2 – Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3- Unobservable inputs reflecting the reporting entity’s own assumptions. Level 3 inputs are considered to carry the least weight within the fair value hierarchy due to substantial levels of judgment required in determining fair values.

The Company has determined that the carrying value of its cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates fair values as at the balance sheet date. As of March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, for the $70.4 million and $62.4 million, respectively, of bank indebtedness and the $30.9 million and $40.0 million, respectively of long-term debt bearing interest at variable rates, the fair value is considered to approximate the carrying value.

As of March 25, 2017 and March 26, 2016, the fair value of the remaining $2.4 million and $12.4 million, respectively of fixed-rate long-term debt is estimated to be approximately $2.3 million and $12.9 million, respectively. The fair value was determined by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at the current market interest rates for the same or similar debt instruments with the same remaining maturities adjusted for all necessary risks, including its own credit risk. In determining an appropriate spread to reflect its credit standing, the Company considered interest rates currently offered to the Company for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities by the Company’s lenders. As a result, the Company has determined that the inputs used to value these long-term debts fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

18. | Subsequent events:

The Company entered into a financing agreement effective May 11, 2017 with a new lender for a credit facility of up to $4.75 million of lease financing relating to certain equipment consisting of furniture, fixtures and computer systems. As of the date of the issuance of these financial statements, the Company had borrowed approximately $2.2 million against this facility.

F-35