XML 18 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
9 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2018
Notes  
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Interim Financial Statements and Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) set forth in Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited condensed interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Unaudited interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year. These unaudited condensed interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2017 and notes thereto contained in our 10-K Annual Report filed on October 13, 2017.

 

a. Basis of Presentation - These financial statements of our company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and are expressed in United States dollars. Our company’s fiscal year end is June 30.

 

b. Use of Estimates and Assumptions - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. Our company bases our estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by our company may differ materially and adversely from our company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected

 

c. Cash Equivalents - For purposes of the balance sheet and statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. The company has no cash equivalents

 

d. Financial Instruments - Our Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and related party payables, notes payable. The fair value of our company’s cash equivalents is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The carrying value of accounts payable and accrued liabilities and related party payables approximates their fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion our company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

 

The company evaluates all of its agreements to determine if such instruments have derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated statements of operations. For stock-base derivative financial instruments, the Company uses a weighted average Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to value the derivative instrument at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instrument, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date. As of March 31, 2018, the Company’s had none derivative financial instruments. As of March 31, 2017, the Company’s derivative financial instruments were three convertible debt notes and one of then includes convertible warrant that are derivative due to the “reset” and “dilutive issuance” clause in the note relating to the conversion price from dilute share issuance.

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company. ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, defines fair value, and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:

 

·         Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 

·         Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in the active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

 

·         Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurements.

 

The Company’s derivative instruments were reported at fair value using Level 2 inputs as discussed in Note 7.

 

The Company uses level 2 inputs for its valuation methodology for the warrant derivative liabilities as their fair values were determined by using a probability weighted average Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model based on various assumptions. The Company’s derivative liability is adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in result of operations as adjustments to fair value of derivatives.

 

At March 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company identified the following liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheet at fair value:

 

Description

 

Fair Value

As of

March 31, 2018

 

 

 

Fair Value

Measurements at

March 31, 2018

Using Fair Value

Hierarchy

 

 

 

 

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Derivative liability

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

Contingent consideration for business combination

-

-

-

-

Total

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

Description

 

Fair Value

As of

March 31, 2017

 

 

 

Fair Value

Measurements at

March 31, 2017

Using Fair Value

Hierarchy

 

 

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Derivative liability

$

173,690

$

-

$

173,690

$

Contingent consideration for business combination

-

-

-

-

Total

$

173,690

$

-

$

173,690

$

-

 

 

e. Earnings (Loss) per Share - Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. At March 31, 2018, all of our potentially dilutive securities outstanding are anti-dilutive and accordingly, basic loss and diluted loss per share are the same. Net loss per share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the applicable period. Basic weighted average common shares outstanding do not include shares of restricted stock that have not yet vested, although such shares are included as outstanding shares in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. Diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and if dilutive; potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares consist of the additional common shares issuable in respect of convertible debt and warrants.

 

The following table present the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share:

 

For the Nine Months Ended March 31,

 

2018

2017

Net loss attributable to PureSnax

$

(183,952)

$

(225,143)

Less: preferred stock dividends

-

-

Net loss applicable to common stock

$

(183,952)

$

(225,143)

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted

40,642

13,657

Loss per share - basic and diluted

$

(4.53)

$

(16.49)

 

f. Foreign Currency Translation - The Company’s initial operations will be in the United States however global expansion is anticipated which results in exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The financial risk is the risk to the Company’s operations that arise from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates. Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk. The Company's functional currency for all operations worldwide is the U.S. dollar. Nonmonetary assets and liabilities are translated into their U.S. dollar equivalents at historical rates and monetary assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect at the end of the year. Revenues and expenses are translated at average rates for the year. Gains and losses from translation of foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in current results of operations.

 

g. Income Taxes - Our Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method which provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Our company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is believed more likely than not to be realized.

 

h. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements - Jumpstart Our Business Startup’s Act (“JOBS Act”) Transition Accounting: pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act, we have elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards for an “emerging growth company”. This election will permit us to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that will have difference effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. Consequently, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates.

 

In April 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing (ASU 2016-10). ASU 2016-10 was issued by the Board to improve Topic 606 by reducing:

 

1)    The potential for diversity in practice at initial application

 

2)    The cost and complexity of applying Topic 606 both at transition and on an ongoing basis.

 

The core principle of the guidance in Topic 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

 

To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:

 

1)    Identify the contract(s) with a customer

 

2)    Identify the performance obligations in the contract

 

3)    Determine the transaction price.

 

4)    Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract.

 

5)    Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

 

The amendments in ASU 2016-10 clarify the following two aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guide, while retaining the related principles for those areas. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in ASU 2016-10 are for annual reporting periods beginning after March 31, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. FASB ASU 2015-14 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, defers the effective date of Update 2014-09 by one year. The Company is currently assessing this guidance for future implementation.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 requires entities to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Topic 842 requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous GAAP. When measuring assets and liabilities arising from a lease, a lessee (and a lessor) should include payments to be made in optional periods only if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise an option to extend the lease or not to exercise an option to terminate the lease. Similarly, optional payments to purchase the underlying asset should be included in the measurement of lease assets and lease liabilities only if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that purchase option. In addition, also consistent with the previous leases guidance, a lessee (and a lessor) should exclude most variable lease payments in measuring lease assets and lease liabilities, other than those that depend on an index or a rate or are in substance fixed payments.

 

For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. If a lessee makes this election, it should recognize lease expense for such leases generally on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

 

The accounting applied by a lessor is largely unchanged from that applied under previous GAAP.

 

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.