10-Q 1 clbs-10qx20150930.htm 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q

x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED September 30, 2015
OR

o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from __________________ to _________________________
Commission File Number 001-33650
CALADRIUS BIOSCIENCES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE | 22-2343568
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.)
106 ALLEN ROAD, FOURTH FLOOR BASKING RIDGE, NJ | 07920
(Address of principal executive offices) | (zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 908-842-0100
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
55,373,251 Shares, $.001 Par Value, as of November 4, 2015
(Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date)

Index
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This quarterly report (this "Quarterly Report") contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as well as historical information. When used in this Quarterly Report, statements that are not statements of current or historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “plan,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “could,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “continue” or similar expressions or other variations or comparable terminology are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, although some forward-looking statements are expressed differently. We remind readers that forward-looking statements are merely predictions and therefore inherently subject to uncertainties and other factors and involve known and unknown risks that could cause the actual results, performance, levels of activity or our achievements or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance, levels of activity or our achievements or industry results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from anticipated results expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, among others:

• | our ability to obtain sufficient capital or strategic business arrangements to fund our operations and expansion plans, including meeting our financial obligations under various licensing and other strategic arrangements, the funding of our clinical trials for product candidates in our development programs for our Immuno-oncology Program, our Immune Modulation Program and our Ischemic Repair Program, and the commercialization of the relevant technology;

• | our ability to build and maintain the management and human resources infrastructure necessary to support the growth of our business;

• | our ability to integrate our acquired businesses successfully and grow such acquired businesses as anticipated, including expanding our PCT business;

• | whether a market is established for our cell-based products and services and our ability to capture a meaningful share of this market;

• | scientific and medical developments beyond our control;

• | our ability to obtain and maintain, as applicable, appropriate governmental licenses, accreditations or certifications or comply with healthcare laws and regulations or any other adverse effect or limitations caused by government regulation of our business;

• | whether any of our current or future patent applications result in issued patents, the scope of those patents and our ability to obtain and maintain other rights to technology required or desirable for the conduct of our business; and our ability to commercialize products without infringing the claims of third party patents;

• | whether any potential strategic or financial benefits of various licensing agreements will be realized;

• | the results of our development activities, including the results of our Intus Phase 3 clinical trial of CLBS20, being developed to treat metastatic melanoma;

• | our ability to complete our other planned clinical trials (or initiate other trials) in accordance with our estimated timelines due to delays associated with enrolling patients due to the novelty of the treatment, the size of the patient population and the need of patients to meet the inclusion criteria of the trial or otherwise;

• | our ability to satisfy our obligations under our loan agreement;

• | other factors discussed in "Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on March 2, 2015 (our "2014 Form 10-K").

The factors discussed herein, including those risks described in "Item 1A. Risk Factors" and elsewhere in our 2014 Form 10-K and in the Company's other periodic filings with the SEC, which are available for review at www.sec.gov under “Search for Company Filings,” could cause actual results and developments to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such statements. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by these and other factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they were made. Except as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
2

Index
TABLE OF CONTENTS

| PART I- FINANCIAL INFORMATION | Page No.
Item 1. | Financial Statements: | 4
| Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 | 4
| Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 | 5
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 | 6
| Consolidated Statements of Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 | 7
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 | 8
| Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements | 9
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 25
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 33
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 33
| PART II- OTHER INFORMATION |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 35
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 35
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 36
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 37
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | 37
Item 5. | Other Information | 37
Item 6. | Exhibits | 39
| Signatures | 40

3

Index
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM I. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
CALADRIUS BIOSCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

| September 30, 2015 |  | December 31, 2014
ASSETS | (Unaudited) |  |
Current Assets |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 24,042,699 |  |  | $ | 19,174,061 |
Marketable securities | 5,349,396 |  |  | 7,080,053 |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $381,588 and $385,362 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively | 2,299,817 |  |  | 3,111,274 |
Deferred costs | 3,348,619 |  |  | 2,566,989 |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 3,441,156 |  |  | 4,349,167 |
Total current assets | 38,481,687 |  |  | 36,281,544 |
Property, plant and equipment, net | 17,095,395 |  |  | 15,960,731 |
Goodwill | 25,209,336 |  |  | 25,209,336 |
Intangible assets, net | 37,706,498 |  |  | 47,560,406 |
Other assets | 1,209,632 |  |  | 1,263,375 |
Total assets | $ | 119,702,548 |  |  | $ | 126,275,392 |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |  |  |  |  |
Current Liabilities |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable | $ | 2,467,049 |  |  | $ | 5,661,173 |
Accrued liabilities | 8,011,205 |  |  | 4,322,901 |
Long-term debt, current | 2,751,425 |  |  | 1,109,612 |
Notes payable, current | 1,012,189 |  |  | 816,776 |
Unearned revenues | 5,498,074 |  |  | 4,334,120 |
Total current liabilities | 19,739,942 |  |  | 16,244,582 |
Long-term Liabilities |  |  |  |  |
Deferred income taxes | 14,566,093 |  |  | 18,176,190 |
Notes payable | 814,062 |  |  | 825,897 |
Long-term debt | 12,248,575 |  |  | 13,890,388 |
Acquisition-related contingent consideration | 13,880,000 |  |  | 18,260,000 |
Other long-term liabilities | 3,457,457 |  |  | 804,546 |
Total liabilities | $ | 64,706,129 |  |  | $ | 68,201,603 |
Commitments and Contingencies |  |  |  |  |
EQUITY |  |  |  |  |
Stockholders' Equity |  |  |  |
Preferred stock, authorized, 20,000,000 shares; Series B convertible redeemable preferred stock liquidation value, 0.01 share of common stock, $.01 par value; 825,000 shares designated; issued and outstanding, 10,000 shares at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 | 100 |  |  | 100 |
Common stock, $.001 par value, authorized 500,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 55,497,240 and 36,783,857 shares, at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively | 55,497 |  |  | 36,784 |
Additional paid-in capital | 395,014,267 |  |  | 350,428,903 |
Treasury stock, at cost | (705,742 | ) |  | (705,742 | )
Accumulated deficit | (338,935,644 | ) |  | (291,246,538 | )
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 878 |  |  | 1,329 |
Total Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. stockholders' equity | 55,429,356 |  |  | 58,514,836 |
Noncontrolling interests | (432,937 | ) |  | (441,047 | )
Total equity | 54,996,419 |  |  | 58,073,789 |
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 119,702,548 |  |  | $ | 126,275,392 |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4

Index
CALADRIUS BIOSCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

| Three Months Ended September 30, |  | Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2015 |  | 2014 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
Revenues | $ | 5,888,450 |  |  | $ | 4,117,783 |  |  | $ | 14,927,691 |  |  | $ | 12,662,290 |
Costs and expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost of revenues | 4,808,679 |  |  | 4,012,369 |  |  | 13,976,087 |  |  | 11,515,168 |
Research and development | 6,315,613 |  |  | 8,469,623 |  |  | 20,719,989 |  |  | 19,024,728 |
Impairment of intangible assets | — |  |  | — |  |  | 9,400,000 |  |  | — |
Selling, general, and administrative | 5,147,166 |  |  | 7,894,291 |  |  | 24,971,438 |  |  | 24,310,324 |
Total operating costs and expenses | 16,271,458 |  |  | 20,376,283 |  |  | 69,067,514 |  |  | 54,850,220 |
Operating loss | (10,383,008 | ) |  | (16,258,500 | ) |  | (54,139,823 | ) |  | (42,187,930 | )
Other (expense) income: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Other (expense) income, net | (410,233 | ) |  | (687,280 | ) |  | 4,398,585 |  |  | (1,062,568 | )
Interest expense | (552,983 | ) |  | (183,477 | ) |  | (1,651,222 | ) |  | (383,539 | )
| (963,216 | ) |  | (870,757 | ) |  | 2,747,363 |  |  | (1,446,107 | )
Loss before provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrolling interests | (11,346,224 | ) |  | (17,129,257 | ) |  | (51,392,460 | ) |  | (43,634,037 | )
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 46,633 |  |  | 47,387 |  |  | (3,610,097 | ) |  | 142,183 |
Net loss | (11,392,857 | ) |  | (17,176,644 | ) |  | (47,782,363 | ) |  | (43,776,220 | )
Less - loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | (16,907 | ) |  | (202,375 | ) |  | (93,257 | ) |  | (514,877 | )
Net loss attributable to Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. common stockholders | $ | (11,375,950 | ) |  | $ | (16,974,269 | ) |  | $ | (47,689,106 | ) |  | $ | (43,261,343 | )
Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. common stockholders | $ | (0.21 | ) |  | $ | (0.48 | ) |  | $ | (1.04 | ) |  | $ | (1.37 | )
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 55,239,119 |  |  | 35,053,218 |  |  | 45,867,567 |  |  | 31,663,221 |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5

Index
CALADRIUS BIOSCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)

| Three Months Ended September 30, |  | Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2015 |  | 2014 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
Net loss | $ | (11,392,857 | ) |  | $ | (17,176,644 | ) |  | $ | (47,782,363 | ) |  | $ | (43,776,220 | )
Other comprehensive loss: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Available for sale securities - net unrealized loss | (988 | ) |  | (886 | ) |  | (451 | ) |  | 112 |
Total other comprehensive loss | (988 | ) |  | (886 | ) |  | (451 | ) |  | 112 |
Comprehensive loss | (11,393,845 | ) |  | (17,177,530 | ) |  | (47,782,814 | ) |  | (43,776,108 | )
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | (16,908 | ) |  | (202,375 | ) |  | (93,257 | ) |  | (514,877 | )
Comprehensive loss attributable to Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. common stockholders | $ | (11,376,937 | ) |  | $ | (16,975,155 | ) |  | $ | (47,689,557 | ) |  | $ | (43,261,231 | )

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6

Index
CALADRIUS BIOSCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(Unaudited)

| Series B Convertible Preferred Stock |  | Common Stock |  | Additional Paid in Capital |  | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |  | Accumulated Deficit |  | Treasury Stock |  | Total Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. Stockholders' Equity |  | Non- Controlling Interest in Subsidiary |  | Total Equity
| Shares |  | Amount |  | Shares |  | Amount |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | 10,000 |  |  | $ | 100 |  |  | 27,196,537 |  |  | $ | 27,197 |  |  | $ | 299,594,525 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (236,373,605 | ) |  | $ | (705,742 | ) |  | $ | 62,542,475 |  |  | $ | (516,040 | ) |  | $ | 62,026,435 |
Net loss | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (43,261,343 | ) |  | — |  |  | (43,261,343 | ) |  | (514,877 | ) |  | (43,776,220 | )
Unrealized gain on marketable securities | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 112 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 112 |  |  | — |  |  | 112 |
Equity-based compensation | — |  |  | — |  |  | 727,158 |  |  | 727 |  |  | 8,940,725 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 8,941,452 |  |  | — |  |  | 8,941,452 |
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1,850,081 |  |  | 1,850 |  |  | 11,273,259 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 11,275,109 |  |  | — |  |  | 11,275,109 |
Proceeds from option exercises | — |  |  | — |  |  | 48,987 |  |  | 49 |  |  | 270,959 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 271,008 |  |  | — |  |  | 271,008 |
Proceeds from warrant exercises | — |  |  | — |  |  | 333,250 |  |  | 333 |  |  | 1,720,392 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1,720,725 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,720,725 |
Shares issued in CSC acquisition | — |  |  | — |  |  | 5,329,510 |  |  | 5,330 |  |  | 21,595,021 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 21,600,351 |  |  | — |  |  | 21,600,351 |
Change in ownership in subsidiary | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (86,617 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (86,617 | ) |  | 86,617 |  |  | — |
Balance at September 30, 2014 | 10,000 |  |  | $ | 100 |  |  | 35,485,523 |  |  | $ | 35,486 |  |  | $ | 343,308,264 |  |  | $ | 112 |  |  | $ | (279,634,948 | ) |  | $ | (705,742 | ) |  | $ | 63,003,272 |  |  | $ | (944,300 | ) |  | $ | 62,058,972 |
| Series B Convertible Preferred Stock |  | Common Stock |  | Additional Paid in Capital |  | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |  | Accumulated Deficit |  | Treasury Stock |  | Total Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. Stockholders' Equity |  | Non- Controlling Interest in Subsidiary |  | Total Equity
| Shares |  | Amount |  | Shares |  | Amount |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Balance at December 31, 2014 | 10,000 |  |  | $ | 100 |  |  | 36,783,857 |  |  | $ | 36,784 |  |  | $ | 350,428,903 |  |  | $ | 1,329 |  |  | $ | (291,246,538 | ) |  | $ | (705,742 | ) |  | $ | 58,514,836 |  |  | $ | (441,047 | ) |  | $ | 58,073,789 |
Net loss | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (47,689,106 | ) |  | — |  |  | (47,689,106 | ) |  | (93,257 | ) |  | (47,782,363 | )
Unrealized loss on marketable securities | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (451 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (451 | ) |  | — |  |  | (451 | )
Equity-based compensation | — |  |  | — |  |  | 811,835 |  |  | 812 |  |  | 8,567,793 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 8,568,605 |  |  | — |  |  | 8,568,605 |
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock | — |  |  | — |  |  | 17,901,548 |  |  | 17,901 |  |  | 36,118,938 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 36,136,839 |  |  | — |  |  | 36,136,839 |
Change in ownership in subsidiary | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (101,367 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (101,367 | ) |  | 101,367 |  |  | — |
Balance at September 30, 2015 | 10,000 |  |  | $ | 100 |  |  | 55,497,240 |  |  | $ | 55,497 |  |  | $ | 395,014,267 |  |  | $ | 878 |  |  | $ | (338,935,644 | ) |  | $ | (705,742 | ) |  | $ | 55,429,356 |  |  | $ | (432,937 | ) |  | $ | 54,996,419 |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
7

Index
CALADRIUS BIOSCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

| Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2015 |  | 2014
Cash flows from operating activities: |  |  |  |  |
Net loss | $ | (47,782,363 | ) |  | $ | (43,776,220 | )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |  |  |  |  |
Equity-based compensation expense | 8,568,605 |  |  | 8,941,452 |
Depreciation and amortization | 1,893,028 |  |  | 1,578,334 |
Changes in fair value of derivative liability | — |  |  | (23,175 | )
Change in acquisition-related contingent consideration | (4,380,000 | ) |  | 1,090,000 |
Impairment of intangible assets | 9,400,000 |  |  | — |
Bad debt recovery | (3,774 | ) |  | (5,763 | )
Deferred income taxes | (3,610,097 | ) |  | 142,183 |
Accretion on marketable securities | 77,577 |  |  | 7,329 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |  |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 908,011 |  |  | (2,795,249 | )
Accounts receivable | 815,231 |  |  | (177,162 | )
Deferred costs | (781,629 | ) |  | (872,079 | )
Unearned revenues | 1,163,954 |  |  | 1,823,379 |
Other assets | 53,743 |  |  | 559,470 |
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities | 3,147,091 |  |  | (2,483,740 | )
Net cash used in operating activities | (30,530,623 | ) |  | (35,991,241 | )
Cash flows from investing activities: |  |  |  |  |
Net cash received in acquisitions | — |  |  | 50,894 |
Purchase of marketable securities | (6,081,900 | ) |  | (920,329 | )
Sale of marketable securities | 7,734,528 |  |  | 248,000 |
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment | (2,573,784 | ) |  | (2,925,918 | )
Net cash used in investing activities | (921,156 | ) |  | (3,547,353 | )
Cash flows from financing activities: |  |  |  |  |
Proceeds from exercise of options | — |  |  | 271,008 |
Proceeds from exercise of warrants | — |  |  | 1,720,725 |
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock | 36,136,839 |  |  | 11,275,109 |
Net proceeds from long-term debt | — |  |  | 14,476,170 |
Repayment of mortgage loan | — |  |  | (3,236,721 | )
Proceeds from notes payable | 1,087,361 |  |  | 1,777,163 |
Repayment of notes payable | (903,783 | ) |  | (737,333 | )
Net cash provided by financing activities | 36,320,417 |  |  | 25,546,121 |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 4,868,638 |  |  | (13,992,473 | )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 19,174,061 |  |  | 46,133,759 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 24,042,699 |  |  | $ | 32,141,286 |
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |  |  |
Cash paid during the period for: |  |  |
Interest | $ | 1,122,479 |  |  | $ | 359,300 |
Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities: |  |  |
Common stock and contingent consideration issued with the acquisition of CSC | $ | — |  |  | $ | 33,490,351 |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
8

Index
CALADRIUS BIOSCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 – The Business
Overview
Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. (“we,” “us”, "our", “Caladrius” or the “Company”) is among the first of a new breed of immunotherapy companies with proven expertise and unique experience in cell process optimization, development, and manufacturing. Caladrius is a company combining a leading cell therapy service provider with a development pipeline including a late-stage clinical program based on a proprietary platform technology for immuno-oncology, as well as additional platform technologies for immunomodulation and ischemic repair. This integrated approach supports the industry in bringing significant life-improving medical treatments to market.
Through our wholly owned subsidiary, PCT, LLC, a Caladrius Company ("PCT"), we are an industry leader in providing high-quality innovative and reliable manufacturing capabilities and engineering solutions (e.g., process and assay development, optimization and automation) in the development of cell-based therapies. In addition to leveraging this core expertise in the development of our own products, we partner with other industry leaders who recognize our unique ability to significantly improve their manufacturing processes and supply clinical and commercial product. PCT has worked with over 120 clients and produced over 20,000 cell therapy products since it was founded over sixteen years ago. We currently operate facilities qualified under current Good Manufacturing Practices ("cGMPs") in each of Allendale, NJ, Mountain View, CA and Irvine, CA, and are positioned to expand our capacity both in the United States and internationally, as needed. As the industry continues to mature and a growing number of cell therapy companies approach commercialization, PCT is well positioned to serve as an external manufacturing partner of choice for commercial cGMP manufacturing of cell therapies.
Our most advanced clinical program is based on our tumor cell/dendritic cell technology. It is focused on the development of an innovative cancer immunotherapy treatment (i.e., vaccine) that is designed to target the cells responsible for tumor growth and metastasis, known as cancer- or tumor-initiating cells ("CICs"), using purified CICs from a patient’s own tumor as an antigen source to induce or enhance an anti-tumor immune response in the patient. CLBS20, our lead product candidate based on this platform technology, targets malignant melanoma. CLBS20 is being studied in patients with recurrent Stage III or Stage IV metastatic melanoma. The program has been granted Fast Track and Orphan designation by the Food and Drug Administration (the "FDA") as well as Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Product classification by the European Medicines Agency (the "EMA"). The protocol for the Phase 3 study, known as the Intus study, is the subject of a Special Protocol Assessment ("SPA") by the FDA. Our SPA letter states that our Phase 3 clinical trial is adequately designed to provide the necessary data that, depending on outcome, could support a Biologics License Application ("BLA") seeking marketing approval of CLBS20. The Intus Study is the subject of a $17.7 million grant from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, announced in May 2015. We have also been awarded a contract from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health for up to $2.3 million for further process optimization of the underlying platform technology. The study protocol calls for randomizing 250 patients, and patient screening began in the first quarter of 2015 with randomization of the first patient announced in April 2015. An interim analysis is planned after 99 trial events (i.e., deaths) and is expected to occur around the end of 2017. The treatment paradigm for metastatic melanoma continues to evolve with the recent approval of several immuno therapies, and combination therapy is already an industry focus. We believe that CLBS20 has a place in the ultimate treatment paradigm, and we will remain flexible in our clinical efforts to maximize the role of CLBS20 in this evolving landscape. We are also evaluating other clinical indications for which we may advance this program, including liver cancer, for which we have completed a successful Phase 1 trial in China, as well as ovarian, colon, kidney, brain and lung cancers.
Another of our pipeline programs is based on the use of Regulatory T Cells ("Tregs") to treat diseases caused by imbalances in an individual's immune system. This novel approach seeks to restore immune balance by enhancing Treg cell number and function. Tregs are a natural part of the human immune system and regulate the activity of T effector cells, the cells that are responsible for protecting the body from viruses and other foreign antigens. When Tregs function properly, only harmful foreign materials are attacked by T effector cells. In autoimmune disease, it is thought that deficient Treg activity permits the T effector cells to attack the body's own beneficial cells. We have entered into a strategic collaboration with Sanford Research with the goal of developing this therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus (“T1D”). Sanford Research is a non-profit research organization that is part of Sanford Health and supports an emerging translational research center focused on finding a cure for T1D. The initial focus of the collaboration will be the execution of a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial (The Sanford Project: Trex Study) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Company’s Tregs product candidate, CLBS03, in adolescents with recent onset T1D. The Phase 2 study has an open and active investigational new drug application ("IND") in place and subject enrollment is expected to commence as early as the first quarter of 2016. An interim safety analysis
9

Index
of the data will occur after the treatment of the first 18 patients is completed, and an interim efficacy analysis is expected after the first 52 patients reach the 6 month follow-up milestone.
The third of our program platforms is designed to utilize CD34 cells to regenerate tissue damaged by ischemic conditions. Ischemia occurs when the supply of oxygenated blood in the body is restricted, causing local tissue distress and death. Ischemia can lead to conditions such as chronic heart failure ("CHF") and critical limb ischemia ("CLI"). We seek to improve oxygen delivery to affected tissues through the development and formation of new blood vessels initiated or enhanced by CD34 cells. We believe that the positive suggestion of safety and therapeutic activity seen to date in the PreSERVE-AMI Phase 2 study of CLBS10 for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction ("STEMI") supports the underlying platform technology and enables the Company’s exploration of what we believe to be more commercially viable indications of chronic heart failure (CLBS14) and/or critical limb ischemia (CLBS12) as targets for further development. In the case of CLI, we are actively exploring a program to develop CLBS12 under Japan's regenerative medicine law in collaboration with Japanese development and/or manufacturing partners. Japan’s regenerative medicine law enables an expedited path to conditional approval for regenerative medicine products that show sufficient safety evidence and signals of efficacy in a Phase 2 study. This program is supported by three previous studies of autologous CD34 cells in no-option CLI patients. These other indications are early stage opportunities and require external funding and/or partnerships to proceed to the next step in clinical development.
We look forward to further advancement of our cell-based therapies to the market and to helping patients suffering from life-threatening medical conditions. Coupling our development expertise with our strong process development and manufacturing capability, we believe the stage is set for us to realize meaningful clinical development of our own proprietary platform technologies and manufacturing advancements, further positioning Caladrius as a leader in the immuno-oncology field and the cell therapy industry.
We anticipate requiring additional capital in order to fund the development of cell therapy product candidates and to grow the PCT business. To meet our short and long term liquidity needs, we currently expect to use existing cash and cash equivalents balances, our revenue generating activities, and a variety of other means, including our common stock purchase agreements with Aspire Capital. Other sources of liquidity could include additional potential issuances of debt or equity securities in public or private financings, option exercises, partnerships and/or collaborations, and/or sale of assets. In addition, we will continue to seek as appropriate grants for scientific and clinical studies from various governmental agencies and foundations. We believe that our current cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances and revenue generating activities, along with access to funds under our agreement with Aspire Capital, will be sufficient to fund the business through the next 12 months. While we continue to seek capital through a number of means, there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. If we are unable to access capital necessary to meet our long-term liquidity needs, we may have to delay or discontinue the acquisition and development of cell therapies, and/or the expansion of our business or raise funds on terms that we currently consider unfavorable.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the SEC for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and its subsidiaries, which are unaudited, include all normal and recurring adjustments considered necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of September 30, 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the periods presented. The unaudited consolidated financial statements herein should be read together with the historical consolidated financial statements of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 included in our 2014 Form 10-K. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements. Estimates also affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The Company makes critical estimates and assumptions in determining the fair values of goodwill for potential goodwill impairments for our reporting units, fair values of In-Process R&D assets, fair values of acquisition-related contingent considerations, useful lives of our tangible and
10

Index
intangible assets, allowances for doubtful accounts, and stock-based awards values. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.
An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it is important to the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and if it requires management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments in its application.
Principles of Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. and its wholly-owned and partially-owned subsidiaries and affiliates as listed below.

Entity |  | Percentage of Ownership |  | Location
Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. |  | 100% |  | United States of America
NeoStem Therapies, Inc. |  | 100% |  | United States of America
Stem Cell Technologies, Inc. |  | 100% |  | United States of America
Amorcyte, LLC |  | 100% |  | United States of America
PCT, LLC, a Caladrius Company |  | 100% |  | United States of America
NeoStem Family Storage, LLC |  | 100% |  | United States of America
Athelos Corporation (1) |  | 97.0% |  | United States of America
PCT Allendale, LLC |  | 100% |  | United States of America
NeoStem Oncology, LLC |  | 100% |  | United States of America

_________________________________________________________________
(1) As of September 30, 2015, Becton Dickinson's ownership interest in Athelos Corporation was 3.0%.
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
In addition to the policies below, our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2014 Form 10-K. There were no changes to these policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include short-term, highly liquid, investments with maturities of 90 days or less when purchased.
Marketable Securities
The Company determines the appropriate classification of our marketable securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such designation at each balance sheet date. All of our marketable securities are considered as available-for-sale and carried at estimated fair values and reported in either cash equivalents or marketable securities. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are excluded from net income and reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of stockholders' equity. Other income (expense), net, includes interest, dividends, amortization of purchase premiums and discounts, realized gains and losses on sales of securities and other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of securities, if any. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. We regularly review all of our investments for other-than-temporary declines in fair value. Our review includes the consideration of the cause of the impairment, including the creditworthiness of the security issuers, the number of securities in an unrealized loss position, the severity and duration of the unrealized losses, whether we have the intent to sell the securities and whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the securities before the recovery of their amortized cost basis. When we determine that the decline in fair value of an investment is below our accounting basis and this decline is other-than-temporary, we reduce the carrying value of the security we hold and record a loss for the amount of such decline.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful accounts. The Company applies judgment in connection with establishing the allowance for doubtful accounts. Specifically, the Company analyzes the aging of accounts receivable balances, historical bad debts, customer concentration and credit-worthiness, current economic trends and changes in the Company’s customer payment terms. Significant changes in customer concentrations or payment terms, deterioration
11

Index
of customer credit-worthiness or weakening economic trends could have a significant impact on the collectability of the receivables and the Company’s operating results. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Management regularly reviews the aging of receivables and changes in payment trends by its customers, and records a reserve when it believes collection of amounts due are at risk.
Deferred Costs
Deferred costs primarily represents costs incurred on in process projects at PCT that have not been completed. The Company reviews these projects periodically to determine that the value of each project is stated at the lower of cost or market.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company expenses all share-based payment awards to employees, directors, advisors and consultants, including grants of stock options, warrants, and restricted stock, over the requisite service period based on the grant date fair value of the awards. Advisor and consultant awards are remeasured each reporting period through vesting. For awards with performance-based vesting criteria, the Company estimates the probability of achievement of the performance criteria and recognizes compensation expense related to those awards expected to vest. The Company determines the fair value of option awards using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model which uses both historical and current market data to estimate the fair value. This method incorporates various assumptions such as the risk-free interest rate, expected volatility, expected dividend yield and expected life of the options or warrants. The fair value of the Company’s restricted stock and restricted stock units is based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Goodwill is the excess of purchase price over the fair value of identified net assets of businesses acquired. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are measured at their respective fair values as of the acquisition date. The Company does not amortize goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives. Intangible assets related to in process research and development ("IPR&D") projects are considered to be indefinite-lived until the completion or abandonment of the associated R&D efforts. If and when development is complete, which generally occurs if and when regulatory approval to market a product is obtained, the associated assets would be deemed finite-lived and would then be amortized based on their respective estimated useful lives at that point in time.
The Company reviews goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets at least annually, or at the time a triggering event is identified for possible impairment. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for possible impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit or the IPR&D below its carrying value. The Company tests its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets each year as of December 31. The Company reviews the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets utilizing an income approach model, and, where appropriate, a market value approach is also utilized to supplement the discounted cash flow model. The Company makes assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows, discount rates, long-term growth rates and market values to determine each reporting unit’s and IPR&D's estimated fair value. If these estimates or related assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record impairment charges. In accordance with its accounting policy, the Company tested goodwill for impairment as of December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 for its two reporting units as well as its IPR&D, and concluded there was no goodwill and IPR&D impairment. As of June 30, 2015, the Company determined that IPR&D valued at $9.4 million was fully impaired (see Note 8). The Company also tested goodwill for impairment as of June 30, 2015, since the IPR&D impairment was deemed a triggering event for goodwill impairment testing purposes, and concluded there was no goodwill impairment.
Definite-Lived Intangible Assets
Definite-lived intangible assets consist of customer lists, manufacturing technology, tradenames, patents and rights. These intangible assets are amortized on a straight line basis over their respective useful lives. The Company reviews definite-lived intangibles assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. If other events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset that the Company expects to hold and use may not be recoverable, the Company will estimate the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and/or its eventual disposition, and recognize an impairment loss, if any. The impairment loss, if determined to be necessary, would be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. No triggering events were noted in the quarter ended September 30, 2015 that would require interim impairment assessment.
12

Index
Recognizing and Measuring Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in Business Combinations at Fair Value
The Company accounts for acquired businesses using the purchase method of accounting, which requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at date of acquisition at their respective fair values. The consolidated financial statements and results of operations reflect an acquired business after the completion of the acquisition. The fair value of the consideration paid, including contingent consideration, is assigned to the underlying net assets of the acquired business based on their respective fair values. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Amounts allocated to IPR&D are included on the balance sheet. Intangible assets, including IPR&D assets upon successful completion of the project and approval of the product, are amortized on a straight-line basis to amortization expense over the expected life of the asset. Significant judgments are used in determining the estimated fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and in determining estimates of useful lives of long-lived assets. Fair value determinations and useful life estimates are based on, among other factors, estimates of expected future net cash flows, estimates of appropriate discount rates used to present value expected from future net cash flow streams, the timing of approvals for IPR&D projects and the timing of related product launch dates, the assessment of each asset’s life cycle, the impact of competitive trends on each asset’s life cycle and other factors. These judgments can materially impact the estimates used to allocate acquisition date fair values to assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the resulting timing and amount charged to, or recognized in current and future operating results. For these and other reasons, actual results may vary significantly from estimated results.
The Company determines the acquisition date fair value of contingent consideration obligations based on a probability-weighted income approach derived from revenue estimates, post-tax gross profit levels and a probability assessment with respect to the likelihood of achieving contingent obligations including contingent payments such as milestone obligations, royalty obligations and contract earn-out criteria, where applicable. The fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in fair value measurement accounting. The resulting probability-weighted cash flows are discounted using an appropriate effective annual interest rate. At each reporting date, the contingent consideration obligation will be revalued to estimated fair value at that time and changes in fair value will be reflected as income or expense in our consolidated statement of operations. Changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration obligations may result from changes in discount periods and rates, changes in the timing and amount of revenue estimates and changes in probability assumptions with respect to the likelihood of achieving the various contingent payment obligations. Changes in assumptions utilized in our contingent consideration fair value estimates could result in an increase or decrease in our contingent consideration obligation and a corresponding charge to operating loss or income.
Revenue Recognition
Clinical Services: The Company recognizes revenue for its (i) process development and (ii) clinical manufacturing services based on the terms of individual contracts.
We recognize revenues when all of the following conditions are met:

• | persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;

• | delivery has occurred or the services have been rendered;

• | the fee is fixed or determinable; and

• | collection is probable.

The Company considers signed contracts as evidence of an arrangement. The Company assesses whether the fee is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the payment terms are subject to refund or adjustment. The Company assesses cash collectability based on a number of factors, including past collection history with the client and the client's creditworthiness. If the Company determines that collectability is not reasonably assured, it defers revenue recognition until collectability becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of the cash. The Company's arrangements are generally non-cancellable, though clients typically have the right to terminate their agreement for cause if the Company materially fails to perform.
Revenues associated with process development services generally contain multiple stages that do not have stand-alone values and are dependent upon one another, and are recognized as revenue on a completed contract basis. Progress billings collected prior to contract completion are recorded as unearned revenue until such time the contract is completed, which usually requires formal client acceptance.
13

Index
Clinical manufacturing services are generally distinct arrangements whereby the Company is paid for time and materials or for fixed monthly amounts. Revenue is recognized when contractual terms have been met.
Some client agreements include multiple elements, comprised of process development and clinical manufacturing services. The Company believes that process development and clinical manufacturing services each have stand-alone value because these services can be provided separately by other companies. The Company (1) separates deliverables into separate units of accounting when deliverables are sold in a bundled arrangement and (2) allocates the arrangement's consideration to each unit in the arrangement based on its relative selling price.
Clinical Services Reimbursements: The Company separately charges the customers for the expenses associated with certain consumable resources (reimbursable expenses) that are specified in each clinical services contract. On a monthly basis, the Company bills customers for reimbursable expenses and immediately recognizes these billings as revenue, as the revenue is deemed earned as reimbursable expenses are incurred. For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, clinical services reimbursements were $0.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, clinical services reimbursements were $2.3 million and $2.8 million, respectively.
Processing and Storage Services: The Company recognizes revenue related to the collection and cryopreservation of autologous adult stem cells when the cryopreservation process is completed which is approximately 24 hours after cells have been collected. Revenue related to advance payments of storage fees is recognized ratably over the period covered by the advance payments.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development ("R&D") expenses include salaries, benefits, and other headcount related costs, clinical trial and related clinical manufacturing costs, contract and other outside service fees including sponsored research agreements, and facilities and overhead costs. The Company expenses the costs associated with research and development activities when incurred.
To further drive the Company’s cell therapy initiatives, the Company will continue targeting key governmental agencies, congressional committees and not-for-profit organizations to contribute funds for the Company’s research and development programs. The Company accounts for such grants as a deduction to the related expense in research and development operating expenses when earned.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncement
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)." The new revenue recognition standard provides a five-step analysis to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The standard requires that a company recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and will be applied retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15 Preparation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. Under GAAP, continuation of a reporting entity as a going concern is presumed as the basis for preparing financial statements unless and until the entity's liquidation becomes imminent. Preparation of financial statements under this presumption is commonly referred to as the going concern basis of accounting. If and when an entity's liquidation becomes imminent, financial statements should be prepared under the liquidation basis of accounting in accordance with Subtopic 205-30, Presentation of Financial Statements - Liquidation Basis of Accounting. Even when an entity's liquidation is not imminent, there may be conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. In those situations, financial statements should continue to be prepared under the going concern basis of accounting, but the provisions in this ASU should be followed to determine whether to disclose information about the relevant conditions and events. The ASU is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the adoption of this ASU and its impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. This ASU requires retrospective adoption and will be effective for us beginning in our first quarter of 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect this adoption to have a material impact on our financial statements.
14

Index
Note 3 – Acquisition
On May 8, 2014, the Company closed (the “Closing”) its acquisition (the “CSC Acquisition”) of California Stem Cell, Inc. ("CSC"), pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 11, 2014 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among the Company and its acquisition subsidiaries (collectively, "Subco"), CSC and Jason Livingston, solely in his capacity as CSC stockholder representative (together with his permitted successors, the “CSC Representative”). At Closing, Fortis Advisors LLC succeeded to the duties of the CSC Representative pursuant to the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, on the Closing date, Subco was merged with CSC (the “Merger”), with Subco surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. At Closing, Subco changed its legal name to NeoStem Oncology, LLC.
Aggregate Merger Consideration
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, all shares of CSC common stock (“CSC Common Stock”) and CSC preferred stock (“CSC Preferred Stock”, and collectively with the CSC Common Stock, the “CSC Capital Stock”) outstanding immediately prior to the Closing, and all outstanding unexercised options to purchase CSC Common Stock (“CSC Options”) (treated as if a net exercise had occurred), were canceled and converted into the right to receive, in the aggregate (and giving effect to the liquidation preferences accorded to the CSC Preferred Stock):
(1)An aggregate of 5,329,593 shares of the Company's common stock (subject to payment of nominal cash in lieu of fractional shares) (the “Closing Merger Consideration”).
(2)if payable after the Closing, certain payments in an amount of up to $90.0 million in the aggregate, payable in shares of the Company's common stock or cash, in the Company’s sole discretion, in the event of the successful completion of certain milestone events in connection with the CSC Acquisition (the “Milestone Payments”, and together with the Closing Merger Consideration, the “Merger Consideration”).
The fair value of the net assets acquired in the CSC Acquisition was $19.4 million. The fair value of the consideration paid by the Company was valued at $33.5 million, resulting in the recognition of goodwill in the amount of $14.1 million. The consideration paid was comprised of equity issued and milestone payments. The fair value of the equity issued by the Company was valued at $21.6 million. The fair value of the milestone payments was valued at $11.9 million, and is contingent on the achievement of certain milestones associated with the future development of the acquired programs. Such contingent consideration has been classified as a liability and will be subject to remeasurement at the end of each reporting period.
The fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed on May 8, 2014 is as follows (in thousands):

Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 51 |
Accounts receivable trade, net | 45 |
Prepaids and other current assets | 19 |
Property, plant and equipment, net | 1,041 |
Other assets | 201 |
Goodwill | 14,092 |
In-Process R&D | 34,290 |
Accounts payable | (333 | )
Accrued liabilities | (2,014 | )
Deferred tax liability | (13,901 | )
Total | $ | 33,491 |

The total cost of the acquisition has been allocated to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. The final allocation was completed during the measurement period which was one year from the date of acquisition.
Pro Forma Financial Information
The following supplemental table presents unaudited consolidated pro forma financial information as if the Closing of
15

Index
the CSC Acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2014 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

|  | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
|  | (As Reported) |  | (Pro forma)
Revenues |  | $ | 12,662 |  |  | $ | 13,373 |
Net loss |  | $ | (43,776 | ) |  | $ | (46,273 | )
Net loss attributable to Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. |  | $ | (43,261 | ) |  | $ | (45,758 | )
Net loss per share attributable to Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. |  | $ | (1.37 | ) |  | $ | (1.24 | )

The unaudited supplemental pro forma financial information should not be considered indicative of the results that would have occurred if the CSC Acquisition had been consummated on January 1, 2014, nor are they indicative of future results.
Note 4 – Available-for-Sale-Securities
The following table is a summary of available-for-sale securities recorded in cash and cash equivalents or marketable securities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands):

| September 30, 2015 |  | December 31, 2014
| Amortized Cost |  | Gross Unrealized Gains |  | Gross Unrealized Losses |  | Estimated Fair Value |  | Amortized Cost |  | Gross Unrealized Gains |  | Gross Unrealized Losses |  | Estimated Fair Value
Certificate of deposits | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 249.0 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 249.0 |
Corporate debt securities | 1,729.4 |  |  | — |  |  | (0.6 | ) |  | 1,728.8 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Money market funds | 12,408.6 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 12,408.6 |  |  | 12,791.9 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 12,791.9 |
Municipal debt securities | 4,285.3 |  |  | 1.5 |  |  | — |  |  | 4,286.8 |  |  | 9,317.3 |  |  | 1.3 |  |  | — |  |  | 9,318.6 |
Total | $ | 18,423.3 |  |  | $ | 1.5 |  |  | $ | (0.6 | ) |  | $ | 18,424.2 |  |  | $ | 22,358.2 |  |  | $ | 1.3 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 22,359.5 |

Estimated fair values of available-for-sale securities are generally based on prices obtained from commercial pricing services. The following table summarizes the classification of the available-for-sale debt securities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands):

| September 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 13,074.8 |  | $ | 15,279.4 |
Marketable securities | 5,349.4 |  | 7,080.1 |
Total | $ | 18,424.2 |  | $ | 22,359.5 |

The following table summarizes our portfolio of available-for-sale debt securities by contractual maturity (in thousands):

| September 30, 2015
| Amortized Cost |  | Estimated Fair Value
Less than one year | $ | 18,423.3 |  |  | $ | 18,424.2 |
Greater than one year | — |  |  | — |
Total | $ | 18,423.3 |  |  | $ | 18,424.2 |

Note 5 – Deferred Costs
Deferred costs, representing work in process for costs incurred on process development contracts that have not been completed, were $3.3 million and $2.6 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The Company
16

Index
also has deferred revenue of approximately $4.9 million and $3.9 million of advance billings received as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, related to these contracts.
Note 6 – Loss Per Share
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred net losses and therefore no common stock equivalents were utilized in the calculation of loss per share as they are anti-dilutive. At September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company excluded the following potentially dilutive securities:

| September 30
| 2015 |  | 2014
Stock Options | 6,611,480 |  |  | 4,459,923 |
Warrants | 3,516,452 |  |  | 3,555,956 |
Restricted Shares | 113,579 |  |  | 233,982 |

Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements
The fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are being measured and reported are defined as the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the principal market at the measurement date (exit price). The Company is required to classify fair value measurements in one of the following categories:
Level 1 inputs are defined as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 inputs are defined as inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 inputs are defined as unobservable inputs for the assets or liabilities. Financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
The Company classifies the fair value of the warrant derivative liabilities as Level 3 inputs. These inputs require material subjectivity because value is derived through the use of a lattice model that values the derivatives based on probability weighted discounted cash flows. In May 2014, the warrants expired and the value of the warrant derivative liabilities were written off and recorded in other expenses in our consolidated statement of operations.
The Company classifies the fair value of contingent consideration obligations as Level 3 inputs. The Company has recognized contingent consideration obligations related to the following:

• | In October 2011, in connection with the acquisition (the "Amorcyte Acquisition") of Amorcyte, LLC ("Amorcyte"), contingent consideration obligations were recognized relating to earn out payments equal to 10% of the net sales of the lead product candidate CLBS10 (in the event of and following the date of first commercial sale of CLBS10, a CD34 therapy), provided that in the event the Company sublicenses CLBS10, the applicable earn out payment will be equal to 30% of any sublicensing fees, and provided further that the Company will be entitled to recover direct out-of-pocket clinical development costs not previously paid or reimbursed and any costs, expenses, liabilities and settlement amounts arising out of claims of patent infringement or otherwise challenging Amorcyte’s right to use intellectual property, by reducing any earn out payments due by 50% until such costs have been recouped in full (the “Earn Out Payments”). As of June 30, 2015, based on a thorough analysis of the available data from the PreSERVE-AMI Phase 2 clinical study for CLBS10, an updated commercial assessment, and consultation with the Company’s scientific advisory board and the Science and Technology Committee of the Board of Directors, the Company determined that it will not pursue further development of CLBS10. As a result, the Amorcyte Acquisition contingent consideration fair value decreased to $0 as of June 30, 2015, since the contingent consideration is based solely on future revenues of CLBS10. The change in estimated fair value has been recorded in other expense (income), net in our consolidated statement of operations.

• | In May 2014, in connection with the CSC Acquisition, contingent consideration obligations were recognized relating to milestone payments of up to $90.0 million, based on the achievement of certain milestones associated with the future

17

Index
development of the acquired programs. The contingent consideration fair value increased from $12.8 million as of December 31, 2014 to $13.9 million as of September 30, 2015. The change in estimated fair value is based on the impact of the time progression to reach those milestones as of September 30, 2015, and has been recorded in other expenses (income), net in our consolidated statement of operations.
The fair value of contingent consideration obligations is based on discounted cash flow models using a probability-weighted income approach. The measurements are based upon unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity based on our own assumptions and experience. The Company bases the timing to complete the development and approval programs on the current development stage of the product and the inherent difficulties and uncertainties in developing a product candidate, such as obtaining FDA and other regulatory approvals. In determining the probability of regulatory approval and commercial success, we utilize data regarding similar milestone events from several sources, including industry studies and our own experience. These fair value measurements represent Level 3 measurements as they are based on significant inputs not observable in the market. Significant judgment is employed in determining the appropriateness of these assumptions as of the acquisition date and for each subsequent period. Accordingly, changes in assumptions could have a material impact on the amount of contingent consideration expense we record in any given period.
The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

|  | September 30, 2015 |  | December 31, 2014
|  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total |  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Marketable securities - available for sale |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 5,349.4 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 5,349.4 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 7,080.0 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 7,080.0 |
|  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 5,349.4 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 5,349.4 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 7,080.0 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 7,080.0 |
Liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Contingent consideration |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 13,880.0 |  |  | $ | 13,880.0 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 18,260.0 |  |  | $ | 18,260.0 |
|  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 13,880.0 |  |  | $ | 13,880.0 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 18,260.0 |  |  | $ | 18,260.0 |

There were no transfers of financial instruments to or from Levels 1, 2 or 3 during the periods presented. For those financial instruments with significant Level 3 inputs, the following table summarizes the activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 by type of instrument (in thousands):

|  | Nine Months Ended
|  | September 30, 2015
|  | Contingent Consideration |  | Total
Beginning liability balance |  | $ | 18,260.0 |  |  | $ | 18,260.0 |
Change in fair value recorded in operations |  | (4,380.0 | ) |  | (4,380.0 | )
Ending liability balance |  | $ | 13,880.0 |  |  | $ | 13,880.0 |

Some of the Company’s financial instruments are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, but are recorded at amounts that approximate fair value due to their liquid or short-term nature, such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable. Our long-term debt and notes payable are carried at cost and approximate fair value due to their variable or fixed interest rates, which are consistent with the interest rates in the market.
Note 8 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The Company's goodwill was $25.2 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
18

Index
The Company's intangible assets and related accumulated amortization as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 consisted of the following (in thousands):

|  |  | September 30, 2015 |  | December 31, 2014
| Useful Life |  | Gross |  | Accumulated Amortization |  | Net |  | Gross |  | Accumulated Amortization |  | Net
Customer list | 10 years |  | $ | 1,000.0 |  |  | $ | (470.1 | ) |  | $ | 529.9 |  |  | $ | 1,000.0 |  |  | $ | (395.1 | ) |  | $ | 604.9 |
Manufacturing technology | 10 years |  | 3,900.0 |  |  | (1,833.4 | ) |  | 2,066.6 |  |  | 3,900.0 |  |  | (1,540.9 | ) |  | 2,359.1 |
Tradename | 10 years |  | 800.0 |  |  | (376.1 | ) |  | 423.9 |  |  | 800.0 |  |  | (316.1 | ) |  | 483.9 |
In process R&D | Indefinite |  | 34,290.0 |  |  | — |  |  | 34,290.0 |  |  | 43,690.0 |  |  | — |  |  | 43,690.0 |
Patent rights | 19 years |  | 669.0 |  |  | (272.9 | ) |  | 396.1 |  |  | 669.0 |  |  | (246.5 | ) |  | 422.5 |
Total Intangible Assets |  |  | $ | 40,659.0 |  |  | $ | (2,952.5 | ) |  | $ | 37,706.5 |  |  | $ | 50,059.0 |  |  | $ | (2,498.6 | ) |  | $ | 47,560.4 |

The Company’s IPR&D programs were acquired in the Amorcyte Acquisition (CD34 technology) and CSC Acquisition (tumor cell/dendritic cell technology). With regards to the CD34 technology, the Company determined as of June 30, 2015, based on a thorough analysis of the available data from the PreSERVE-AMI Phase 2 clinical study, an updated commercial assessment, and consultation with the Company’s scientific advisory board and the Science and Technology Committee of the Board of Directors, that it will not pursue further development of CLBS10 for the acute myocardial infarction indication upon completion of the ongoing PreSERVE-AMI Phase 2 clinical study. However, it intends to explore other potential and more commercially viable indications of chronic heart failure and/or critical limb ischemia for its CD34 cell technology platform. These other indications are early stage opportunities, and would require external funding and/or partnerships to proceed to the next step in clinical development. As a result, and given the early stage and funding constraints of these other potential opportunities, the Company determined that IPR&D valued at $9.4 million was fully impaired as of June 30, 2015.
Total intangible amortization expense was classified in the operating expense categories for the periods included below as follows (in thousands):

| Three Months Ended September 30, |  | Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2015 |  | 2014 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
Cost of revenue | $ | 75.8 |  |  | $ | 78.7 |  |  | $ | 229.7 |  |  | $ | 158.4 |
Research and development | 30.5 |  |  | 27.6 |  |  | 89.2 |  |  | 54.2 |
Selling, general and administrative | 45.0 |  |  | 45.0 |  |  | 135.0 |  |  | 90.0 |
Total | $ | 151.3 |  |  | $ | 151.3 |  |  | $ | 453.9 |  |  | $ | 302.6 |

Estimated intangible amortization expense for the succeeding five years is as follows (in thousands):

2015 | $ | 151.3 |
2016 | 605.2 |
2017 | 605.2 |
2018 | 605.2 |
2019 | 605.2 |
Thereafter | 35,134.4 |
Total | $ | 37,706.5 |

Note 9 – Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were as follows (in thousands):
19

Index

| September 30, 2015 |  | December 31, 2014
Salaries, employee benefits and related taxes | $ | 3,827.1 |  |  | $ | 2,807.2 |
Professional fees | 523.3 |  |  | 495.4 |
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine advance funding - current | 600.0 |  |  | — |
Other | 3,060.8 |  |  | 1,020.3 |
Total | $ | 8,011.2 |  |  | $ | 4,322.9 |

Note 10 – Debt
Notes Payable
As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had notes payable of approximately $1.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively. The notes relate to certain insurance policies and equipment financings, require monthly payments, and mature within one to three years.
Long-Term Debt
On September 26, 2014, the Company entered into a loan and security agreement (the “Loan and Security Agreement”) with Oxford Finance LLC (together with its successors and assigns, the “Lender”) pursuant to which the Lender disbursed $15.0 million (the “Loan”). After repayment of all outstanding amounts due under two loans from TD Bank, N.A. in the amount of approximately $3.1 million, and deductions for debt offering/issuance costs and interim period interest, the net proceeds from Loan were $11.7 million. The debt offering/issuance costs have been recorded as debt issuance costs in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet, and will be amortized to interest expense throughout the life of the Loan using the effective interest rate method. The proceeds from the Loan may be used to satisfy the Company’s future working capital needs, including the development of its cell therapy product candidates.
The Company has been making interest-only payments on the outstanding amount of Loan on a monthly basis at a rate of 8.50% per annum. On April 29, 2015, with the Company's announcement that the first patient in the Intus Study had been randomized, the interest-only payment period on the Loan was extended from October 1, 2015 to April 1, 2016, which was in accordance with the Loan and Security Agreement. Commencing on April 1, 2016, the Company will make 30 consecutive monthly payments of principal and interest. The Loan matures on September 1, 2018. At its option, the Company may prepay all amounts owed under the Loan and Security Agreement (including all accrued and unpaid interest), subject to a prepayment fee that is determined based on the date the loan is prepaid. The Company is also required to pay Lender a final payment fee equal to 8% of the Loan. The final payment fee will be amortized to interest expense throughout the life of the Loan using the effective interest rate method. The Company paid a facility fee in the amount of $100,000 in connection with Loan.
Under the Loan and Security Agreement and a related mortgage, the Company granted to Lender a security interest in all of the Company’s real property and personal property now owned or hereafter acquired, excluding intellectual property, and certain other assets and exemptions. The Company also entered into a Mortgage and Absolute Assignment of Leases and Rents (the "Mortgage"). The Company also granted Lender a security interest in the shares of the Company’s subsidiaries. The Loan and Security Agreement restricts the ability of the Company to: (a) convey, lease, sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of any part of its business or property; and (b) incur any additional indebtedness. The Loan and Security Agreement provides for standard indemnification of Lender and contains representations, warranties and certain covenants of the Company. Upon the occurrence of an event of default by the Company under the Loan and Security Agreement, Lender will have customary acceleration, collection and foreclosure remedies. There are no financial covenants associated to the Loan and Security Agreement. As of September 30, 2015, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Loan and Security Agreement.
Estimated future principal payments, interest, and fees due under the Loan and Security Agreement are as follows:

Years Ending December 31, | (in millions)
2015 | $ | 0.3 |
2016 | 5.3 |
2017 | 6.7 |
2018 | 6.2 |
Total | $ | 18.5 |

20

Index
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recognized $1.0 million of interest expense related to the Loan and Security Agreement.
Note 11 – Shareholders' Equity
Equity Issuances
June 2015 Public Offering
In June 2015, the Company completed an underwritten offering of 12.5 million shares of the Company's common stock, at a public offering price of $2.00 per share. The underwriters also exercised their entire over-allotment option of 1.875 million shares. The Company received gross proceeds of $28.8 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by the Company.
Aspire Purchase Agreements
In November 2015, the Company entered into a common stock purchase agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") with Aspire Capital Fund, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company (“Aspire Capital”), which provides that, subject to certain terms and conditions, Aspire Capital is committed to purchase up to an aggregate of $30 million of shares (limited to a maximum of approximately 11.0 million shares, unless stockholder approval is obtained or certain minimum sale price levels are reached) of the Company's common stock over a 24-month term. As consideration for entering into the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued 842,696 shares of its common stock to Aspire Capital (see Note 16).
Under the Purchase Agreement, at the Company’s discretion, it may present Aspire Capital with purchase notices from time to time to purchase the Company’s common stock, provided certain price and other requirements are met. The purchase price for the shares of common stock is based upon one of two formulas set forth in the Purchase Agreement depending on the type of purchase notice the Company submits to Aspire Capital, and is based on market prices of the Company’s common stock (in the case of regular purchases) or a discount of 5% applied to volume weighted average prices (in the case of VWAP purchases), in each case as determined by parameters defined in the Purchase Agreements. We have filed a registration statement with the SEC and a related prospectus supplement that covers the offering of shares of our common stock subject to the Purchase Agreement, and therefore can initiate sales to Aspire at any time.
We are party to two existing agreements with Aspire Capital (the "May 2015 Purchase Agreement" and the "March 2014 Purchase Agreement", or collectively, the "Previous Purchase Agreements"). The registration statement we previously filed with the SEC to cover offerings of shares of our common stock subject to the previous Purchase Agreements has expired, and we have not, and currently have no intention to include such shares in a registration statement filed with the SEC. Unless and until we include such shares in a registration statement filed with the SEC, we are unable to initiate sales to Aspire under the Previous Purchase Agreements.
Under the May 2015 Purchase Agreement, Aspire Capital is committed to purchase up to an aggregate of $30 million of shares. As consideration for entering into the May 2015 Purchase Agreement, the Company issued 364,837 shares of its common stock to Aspire Capital. The Company has not issued any additional shares under the May 2015 Purchase Agreement. Under the March 2014 Purchase Agreement, Aspire Capital is committed to purchase up to an aggregate of $30.0 million of shares. As consideration for entering into the March 2014 Purchase Agreement, the Company issued 150,000 shares of its common stock to Aspire Capital. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company issued 3.0 million shares of common stock under the March 2014 Purchase Agreement with Aspire for gross proceeds of $9.4 million. Overall, the Company issued 5.1 million shares under the March 2014 Purchase Agreement for gross proceeds of $20.3 million.
Stock Options and Warrants
The following table summarizes the activity for stock options and warrants for the nine months ended September 30, 2015:
21

Index

|  | Stock Options |  | Warrants
|  | Shares |  | Weighted Average Exercise Price |  | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) |  | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (In Thousands) |  | Shares |  | Weighted Average Exercise Price |  | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) |  | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (In Thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 |  | 4,427,234 |  |  | $ | 9.19 |  |  | 6.93 |  | $ | 28.6 |  |  | 3,550,956 |  |  | $ | 14.12 |  |  | 2.12 |  | $ | 1.0 |
Changes during the period: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Granted |  | 3,036,688 |  |  | $ | 3.23 |  |  |  |  |  |  | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  |  |  |
Exercised |  | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  |  |  |  |  | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  |  |  |
Forfeited |  | (370,588 | ) |  | $ | 5.32 |  |  |  |  |  |  | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  |  |  |
Expired |  | (481,854 | ) |  | $ | 7.34 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (34,504 | ) |  | $ | 19.78 |  |  |  |  |
Outstanding at September 30, 2015 |  | 6,611,480 |  |  | $ | 6.82 |  |  | 7.36 |  | $ | 15.2 |  |  | 3,516,452 |  |  | $ | 14.06 |  |  | 1.39 |  | $ | — |
Vested at September 30, 2015 or expected to vest in the future |  | 6,362,987 |  |  | $ | 6.94 |  |  | 7.28 |  | $ | 13.2 |  |  | 3,516,452 |  |  | $ | 14.06 |  |  | 1.39 |  | $ | — |
Vested at September 30, 2015 |  | 4,685,074 |  |  | $ | 7.91 |  |  | 6.69 |  | $ | — |  |  | 3,516,452 |  |  | $ | 14.06 |  |  | 1.39 |  | $ | — |

Restricted Stock
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company issued restricted stock for services as follows (in thousands, except share data):

|  | Nine Months Ended September 30,
|  | 2015 |  | 2014
Number of Restricted Stock Issued |  | 811,835 |  |  | 708,706 |
Value of Restricted Stock Issued |  | $ | 2,367.5 |  |  | $ | 4,964.0 |

The weighted average estimated fair value of restricted stock issued for services in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was $3.10 and $7.00 per share, respectively. The fair value of the restricted stock was determined using the Company’s closing stock price on the date of issuance.
Note 12 – Share-Based Compensation
Share-based Compensation
We utilize share-based compensation in the form of stock options, warrants and restricted stock. The following table summarizes the components of share-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):

| Three Months Ended September 30, |  | Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2015 |  | 2014 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
Cost of goods sold | $ | 14.4 |  |  | $ | 55.9 |  |  | $ | 509.5 |  |  | $ | 292.6 |
Research and development | 115.9 |  |  | 515.7 |  |  | 1,642.8 |  |  | 1,364.2 |
Selling, general and administrative | 306.2 |  |  | 2,716.3 |  |  | 6,416.2 |  |  | 7,284.7 |
Total share-based compensation expense | $ | 436.5 |  |  | $ | 3,287.9 |  |  | $ | 8,568.5 |  |  | $ | 8,941.5 |

Total compensation cost related to nonvested awards not yet recognized and the weighted-average periods over which the awards are expected to be recognized at September 30, 2015 were as follows (in thousands):

| Stock Options |  | Warrants |  | Restricted Stock
Unrecognized compensation cost | $ | 3,898.6 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 336.5 |
Expected weighted-average period in years of compensation cost to be recognized | 3.27 |  |  |  |  |  | 2.67 |

22

Index
Total fair value of shares vested and the weighted average estimated fair values of shares granted for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in thousands):

| Stock Options |  | Warrants
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |  | Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2015 |  | 2014 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
Total fair value of shares vested | $ | 5,303.9 |  |  | $ | 4,141.6 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 15.3 |
Weighted average estimated fair value of shares granted | $ | 2.10 |  |  | $ | 4.67 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |

Valuation Assumptions
The fair value of stock options and warrants at the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The expected volatility is based upon historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The expected term for the options is based upon observation of actual time elapsed between date of grant and exercise of options for all employees. The expected term for the warrants is based upon the contractual term of the warrants.
Note 13 – Research Funding
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
In June 2015, the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine ("CIRM") granted the Company a $17.7 million award (the "Award") to fund a significant portion of its Phase 3 Intus study for treating patients with recurrent Stage III or Stage IV metastatic melanoma. The Award provides for a $3.0 million project initiation payment, and $14.7 million in future operational milestone payments, and is subject to a dollar-for-dollar match funding by the Company. On June 30, 2015, the Company received the $3.0 million project initiation payment from CIRM, which will be amortized over the estimated Award period as a reduction to the related research and development expenses. Future operational milestone payments will be recorded as a reduction to research and development expenses when the milestone is achieved and payment is received or probable. The State of California has the right to receive, subject to the terms and conditions of the agreement between the Company and CIRM, future payments from the Company, or its collaborators, from sales of a commercial product resulting from research and development efforts supported by the grant, of up to nine times of the Award.
Note 14 – Income Taxes
As of December 31, 2014, the Company had approximately $177.2 million of Federal net operating loss carryforwards ("NOLs") available to offset future taxable income expiring from 2025 through 2033. In accordance with Section 382 of the Internal Revenue code, the usage of the Company’s NOLs could be limited in the event of a change in ownership. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the period when those temporary differences become deductible. If a change of ownership did occur there would be an annual limitation on the usage of the Company’s losses which are available through 2032.
In assessing the ability to realize deferred tax assets, including the NOLs, the Company assesses the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to utilize its existing deferred tax assets. Based on its assessment, the Company has provided a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets as their future utilization remains uncertain at this time.
Deferred tax liabilities were $14.6 million and $18.2 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, and relate to the taxable temporary differences on (i) the goodwill recognized in the PCT acquisition in 2011, (ii) the in-process R&D intangible asset recognized in the Amorcyte Acquisition in 2011, and (iii) the IPR&D intangible asset recognized in the CSC Acquisition in 2014. The taxable temporary difference associated with the goodwill, which is tax deductible and will be amortized over 15 years, will continue to increase the deferred tax liability balance over the amortization period, with an associated charge to the tax provision in each period. The deferred tax liabilities will only reverse when these indefinite-lived assets are sold, impaired, or reclassified from an indefinite-lived asset to a finite-lived asset. As of June 30, 2015, IPR&D recognized in the Amorcyte Acquisition and valued at $9.4 million was fully impaired (see Note 8), resulting in the reversal of the associated deferred tax liability of $3.7 million.
As of September 30, 2015, management does not believe the Company has any material uncertain tax positions that would require it to measure and reflect the potential lack of sustainability of a position on audit in its financial statements. The Company
23

Index
will continue to evaluate its uncertain tax positions in future periods to determine if measurement and recognition in its financial statements is necessary. The Company does not believe there will be any material changes in its unrecognized tax positions over the next year.
The Company's federal tax returns are currently being audited for the years 2012 and 2013. For years prior to 2011 the federal statute of limitations is closed for assessing tax. The Company’s state tax returns remain open to examination for a period of 3 to 4 years from date of filing. The Company ceased doing business in China in 2012. After 2012, the Company had no foreign tax filing obligations. The returns filed for 2012 and prior are subject to examination for 5 years.
Note 15 – Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Commitments
We entered into an assignment agreement with an unaffiliated third party, effective February 19, 2015, for general office space located in Basking Ridge, NJ. This property is used as the Company's corporate headquarters. The space is approximately 18,000 rentable square feet. The base monthly rent is currently $25,000 and the lease term ends July 31, 2020. In addition, there are two (2) five (5) year renewal options. In connection with the assumption of the lease, the third party (a) conveyed its rights in various scheduled furniture and equipment and (b) paid the Company approximately $580,000. The amount paid to the Company included a security deposit of approximately $115,000. The Company also leases facilities in New York, NY, Irvine, CA, and Mountain View, CA, of which certain have escalation clauses and renewal options, and also leases equipment under certain noncancelable operating leases that expire from time to time through 2021.
A summary of future minimum rental payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining terms in excess of one year as of September 30, 2015 are as follows (in thousands):

Years ended |  | Operating Leases
2015 |  | $ | 492.8 |
2016 |  | 2,062.0 |
2017 |  | 1,863.8 |
2018 |  | 1,034.8 |
2019 and thereafter |  | 1,949.6 |
Total minimum lease payments |  | $ | 7,403.0 |

Expense incurred under operating leases was approximately $0.4 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Expense incurred under operating leases was approximately $1.2 million and $0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Contingencies
We have entered into a strategic collaboration with Sanford Research with the goal of developing a therapy for the treatment of T1D. The initial focus of the collaboration will be the execution of a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial (The Sanford Project: Trex Study) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Company’s T regulatory cell product candidate, CLBS03, in adolescents with recent onset T1D. The Phase 2 study has an open and active IND in place and subject enrollment is expected to commence as early as the first quarter of 2016. We will be initially responsible for the supply of all study drug to the first 18 enrolled patients upon commencement of the study.
Under license agreements with third parties the Company is typically required to pay maintenance fees, make milestone payments and/or pay other fees and expenses and pay royalties upon commercialization of products. The Company also sponsors research at various academic institutions, which research agreements generally provide us with an option to license new technology discovered during the course of the sponsored research.
From time to time, the Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of pending claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that the outcome of any pending claims will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition or operating results.
24

Index
Note 16 – Subsequent Events
November 2015 Aspire Capital Agreement
In November, 2015, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Aspire Capital, whereby Aspire Capital is committed to purchase up to an aggregate of $30 million of shares (limited to a maximum of approximately 11.0 million shares, unless stockholder approval is obtained or certain minimum sales price levels are met) of the Company's common stock over a 24-month term. As consideration for entering into the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued 842,696 shares of its common stock to Aspire Capital.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” herein and under “Risk Factors” in our 2014 Form 10-K. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report and in our 2014 Form 10-K.
Overview
Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. (“we,” “us”, "our", “Caladrius” or the “Company”) is among the first of a new breed of immunotherapy companies with proven expertise and unique experience in cell process optimization, development, and manufacturing. Caladrius is a company combining a leading cell therapy service provider with a development pipeline including a late-stage clinical program based on a proprietary platform technology for immuno-oncology, as well as additional platform technologies for immunomodulation and ischemic repair. This integrated approach supports the industry in bringing significant life-improving medical treatments to market.
Through our wholly owned subsidiary, PCT, LLC, a Caladrius Company ("PCT"), we are an industry leader in providing high-quality innovative and reliable manufacturing capabilities and engineering solutions (e.g., process and assay development, optimization and automation) in the development of cell-based therapies. In addition to leveraging this core expertise in the development of our own products, we partner with other industry leaders who recognize our unique ability to significantly improve their manufacturing processes and supply clinical and commercial product. PCT has worked with over 120 clients and produced over 20,000 cell therapy products since it was founded over sixteen years ago. We currently operate facilities qualified under current Good Manufacturing Practices ("cGMPs") in each of Allendale, NJ, Mountain View, CA and Irvine, CA, and are positioned to expand our capacity both in the United States and internationally, as needed. As the industry continues to mature and a growing number of cell therapy companies approach commercialization, PCT is well positioned to serve as an external manufacturing partner of choice for commercial cGMP manufacturing of cell therapies.
Our most advanced clinical program is based on our tumor cell/dendritic cell technology. It is focused on the development of an innovative cancer immunotherapy treatment (i.e., vaccine) that is designed to target the cells responsible for tumor growth and metastasis, known as cancer- or tumor-initiating cells ("CICs"), using purified CICs from a patient’s own tumor as an antigen source to induce or enhance an anti-tumor immune response in the patient. CLBS20, our lead product candidate based on this platform technology, targets malignant melanoma. CLBS20 is being studied in patients with recurrent Stage III or Stage IV metastatic melanoma. The program has been granted Fast Track and Orphan designation by the Food and Drug Administration (the "FDA") as well as Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Product classification by the European Medicines Agency (the "EMA"). The protocol for the Phase 3 study, known as the Intus study, is the subject of a Special Protocol Assessment ("SPA") by the FDA. Our SPA letter states that our Phase 3 clinical trial is adequately designed to provide the necessary data that, depending on outcome, could support a Biologics License Application ("BLA") seeking marketing approval of CLBS20. The Intus Study is the subject of a $17.7 million grant from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, announced in May 2015. We have also been awarded a contract from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health for up to $2.3 million for further process optimization of the underlying platform technology. The study protocol calls for randomizing 250 patients, and patient screening began in the first quarter of 2015 with randomization of the first patient announced in April 2015. An interim analysis is planned after 99 trial events (i.e., deaths) and is expected to occur around the end of 2017. The treatment paradigm for metastatic melanoma continues to evolve with the recent approval of several immuno therapies, and combination therapy is already an industry focus. We believe that CLBS20 has a place in the ultimate treatment paradigm, and we will remain flexible in our clinical efforts to
25

Index
maximize the role of CLBS20 in this evolving landscape. We are also evaluating other clinical indications for which we may advance this program, including liver cancer, for which we have completed a successful Phase 1 trial in China, as well as ovarian, colon, kidney, brain and lung cancers.
Another of our pipeline programs is based on the use of Regulatory T Cells ("Tregs") to treat diseases caused by imbalances in an individual's immune system. This novel approach seeks to restore immune balance by enhancing Treg cell number and function. Tregs are a natural part of the human immune system and regulate the activity of T effector cells, the cells that are responsible for protecting the body from viruses and other foreign antigens. When Tregs function properly, only harmful foreign materials are attacked by T effector cells. In autoimmune disease, it is thought that deficient Treg activity permits the T effector cells to attack the body's own beneficial cells. We have entered into a strategic collaboration with Sanford Research with the goal of developing this therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus (“T1D”). Sanford Research is a non-profit research organization that is part of Sanford Health and supports an emerging translational research center focused on finding a cure for T1D. The initial focus of the collaboration will be the execution of a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial (The Sanford Project: Trex Study) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Company’s Tregs product candidate, CLBS03, in adolescents with recent onset T1D. The Phase 2 study has an open and active investigational new drug application ("IND") in place and subject enrollment is expected to commence as early as the first quarter of 2016. An interim safety analysis of the data will occur after the treatment of the first 18 patients is completed, and an interim efficacy analysis is expected after the first 52 patients reach the 6 month follow-up milestone.
The third of our program platforms is designed to utilize CD34 cells to regenerate tissue damaged by ischemic conditions. Ischemia occurs when the supply of oxygenated blood in the body is restricted, causing local tissue distress and death. Ischemia can lead to conditions such as chronic heart failure ("CHF") and critical limb ischemia ("CLI"). We seek to improve oxygen delivery to affected tissues through the development and formation of new blood vessels initiated or enhanced by CD34 cells. We believe that the positive suggestion of safety and therapeutic activity seen to date in the PreSERVE-AMI Phase 2 study of CLBS10 for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction ("STEMI") supports the underlying platform technology and enables the Company’s exploration of what we believe to be more commercially viable indications of chronic heart failure (CLBS14) and/or critical limb ischemia (CLBS12) as targets for further development. In the case of CLI, we are actively exploring a program to develop CLBS12 under Japan's regenerative medicine law in collaboration with Japanese development and/or manufacturing partners. Japan’s regenerative medicine law enables an expedited path to conditional approval for regenerative medicine products that show sufficient safety evidence and signals of efficacy in a Phase 2 study. This program is supported by three previous studies of autologous CD34 cells in no-option CLI patients. These other indications are early stage opportunities and require external funding and/or partnerships to proceed to the next step in clinical development.
We look forward to further advancement of our cell-based therapies to the market and to helping patients suffering from life-threatening medical conditions. Coupling our development expertise with our strong process development and manufacturing capability, we believe the stage is set for us to realize meaningful clinical development of our own proprietary platform technologies and manufacturing advancements, further positioning Caladrius as a leader in the immuno-oncology field and the cell therapy industry.
Results of Operations
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 Compared to Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
Net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was approximately $11.4 million compared to $17.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was approximately $47.8 million compared to $43.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 included the impact of the Company's decision to no longer pursue further development of CLBS10 upon completion of the ongoing PreSERVE-AMI Phase 2 clinical study. Based on this decision, the Company determined that in process research and development ("IPR&D") valued at $9.4 million was fully impaired (recorded in impairment of intangible assets in our consolidated statement of operations), and the associated deferred tax liability of $3.7 million was reversed (recorded in benefit from income taxes in our consolidated statement of operations). In addition, the fair value of contingent consideration associated with earn out payments on CLBS10 future revenues was reduced from $5.6 million to $0 (recorded in other income in our consolidated statement of operations). The overall net impact for these changes was a $20,000 increase in net loss.
Revenues
26

Index
For the three months ended September 30, 2015, total revenues were approximately $5.9 million compared to $4.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, representing an increase of $1.8 million, or 43%. Revenues were comprised of the following (in thousands):

| Three Months Ended September 30,
| 2015 |  | 2014
Clinical Services | $ | 4,099.7 |  |  | $ | 2,082.8 |
Clinical Services Reimbursables | 878.4 |  |  | 976.2 |
Processing and Storage Services | 910.4 |  |  | 1,058.8 |
| $ | 5,888.5 |  |  | $ | 4,117.8 |

• | Clinical Services were approximately $4.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $2.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, representing an increase of approximately $2.0 million or 97%. The increase was primarily due to $2.1 million of higher clinical manufacturing revenue.

◦ | Process Development Revenue - Process development revenues were approximately $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $0.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. In accordance with our revenue recognition policy, process development revenue is recognized upon contract completion (i.e., when the services under a particular contract are completed). As a result, unearned revenue relating to process development contracts increased from $3.6 million as of June 30, 2015 to $4.3 million as of September 30, 2015. Process development revenue will continue to fluctuate from period to period as a result of our process development revenue recognition policy, and the timing upon when services for a contract are completed.

◦ | Clinical Manufacturing Revenue - Clinical manufacturing revenues were approximately $3.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase is primarily due to an increase in the number of patients our customers have enrolled and treated in clinical trials, which number varies depending on the stage of the clinical trial.

• | Clinical Services Reimbursables were approximately $0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, representing a decrease of approximately $0.1 million, or 10%. Generally, clinical services reimbursables correlate with clinical services revenues. However, differences in the cost of supplies to be reimbursed can vary greatly from contract to contract based on the cost of supplies needed for each client's manufacturing and development process and may impact this correlation. In addition, our terms for billing reimbursable expenses do not include a significant mark-up in the acquisition cost of such consumables, and as a result, changes in this revenue category have little impact on our gross profit and net loss.

• | Processing and Storage Services were approximately $0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $1.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, representing a decrease of approximately $0.1 million or 14%. The decrease was primarily due to lower volume for our oncology stem cell processing services.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, total revenues were approximately $14.9 million compared to $12.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, representing an increase of $2.3 million, or 18%. Revenues were comprised of the following (in thousands):

| Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2015 |  | 2014
Clinical Services | $ | 9,580.3 |  |  | $ | 7,143.7 |
Clinical Services Reimbursables | 2,263.0 |  |  | 2,823.6 |
Processing and Storage Services | 2,964.4 |  |  | 2,695.0 |
Other | 120.0 |  |  | — |
| $ | 14,927.7 |  |  | $ | 12,662.3 |

• | Clinical Services were approximately $9.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $7.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, representing an increase of approximately $2.4 million, or 34%. The increase was primarily due to $2.3 million of higher clinical manufacturing revenue.

27

Index

◦ | Process Development Revenue - Process development revenues were approximately $2.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $2.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. In accordance with our revenue recognition policy, process development revenue is recognized upon contract completion (i.e., when the services under a particular contract are completed). As a result, unearned revenue relating to process development contracts increased from $3.2 million as of December 31, 2014 to $4.3 million as of September 30, 2015 Process development revenue will continue to fluctuate from period to period as a result of our process development revenue recognition policy, and the timing upon when services for a contract are completed.

◦ | Clinical Manufacturing Revenue - Clinical manufacturing revenues were approximately $6.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $4.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase is primarily due to an increase in the number of patients our customers have enrolled and treated in clinical trials, which number varies depending on the stage of the clinical trial.

• | Clinical Services Reimbursables were approximately $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, representing a decrease of approximately $0.6 million, or 20%. Generally, clinical services reimbursables correlate with clinical services revenues. However, differences in the cost of supplies to be reimbursed can vary greatly from contract to contract based on the cost of supplies needed for each client's manufacturing and development process and may impact this correlation. In addition, our terms for billing reimbursable expenses do not include a significant mark-up in the acquisition cost of such consumables, and as a result, changes in this revenue category have little impact on our gross profit and net loss.

• | Processing and Storage Services were approximately $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, representing an increase of approximately $0.3 million, or 10%. The increase was primarily due to higher volume for our oncology stem cell processing services.

Operating Costs and Expenses of Revenues
For the three months ended September 30, 2015, operating costs and expenses totaled $16.3 million compared to $20.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, representing a decrease of $4.1 million, or 20%. Operating costs and expenses were comprised of the following:

• | Cost of revenues were approximately $4.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $4.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, representing an increase of $0.8 million, or 20%. Overall, gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was $1.1 million, or 18%, compared to gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2014 of $0.1 million, or 3%. Gross profit percentages generally will increase/decrease as Clinical Service revenue increases/decreases. However, gross profit percentages will also fluctuate from period to period due to the mix of service and reimbursable revenues and costs.

• | Research and development expenses were approximately $6.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $8.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, representing a decrease of approximately $2.2 million, or 25%.

◦ | Immuno-oncology - Immuno-oncology expenses, which are primarily associated with the Intus Phase 3 clinical trial for our lead immunotherapy product candidate CLBS20, were $3.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, representing an increase of $0.8 million compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014.

◦ | Ischemic Repair - Ischemic repair expenses were $1.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, representing a decrease of approximately $1.0 million compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease is primarily due to lower expenses associated with a potential critical limb ischemia development program in Japan, and lower expenses associated with the PreSERVE-AMI Phase 2 study for CLBS10.

◦ | Immune Modulation - Immune modulation expenses, including our efforts focused on initiating a Phase 2 study in T1D, were $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, representing a decrease of $1.5 million compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014.

28

Index

◦ | Other - Other research and development expenses were $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, representing a decrease of approximately $0.5 million compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease was primarily due to lower equity-based compensation expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the prior year.

• | Selling, general and administrative expenses were approximately $5.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $7.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, representing a decrease of approximately $2.7 million, or 35%. Equity-based compensation included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was approximately $0.3 million, compared to approximately $2.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, representing a decrease of $2.4 million. Equity-based compensation expense is expected to fluctuate in future quarters as equity-linked instruments are used to compensate employees, consultants and other service providers. Non-equity-based general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2015 were approximately $4.8 million, compared to approximately $5.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, representing a decrease of $0.3 million. The decrease was primarily related to lower expenses associated with corporate development activities during the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the prior year period.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, operating costs and expenses totaled $69.1 million compared to $54.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, representing an increase of $14.2 million or 26%. Operating costs and expenses were comprised of the following:

• | Cost of revenues were approximately $14.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $11.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, representing an increase of $2.5 million, or 21%. Overall, gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $1.0 million, or 6%, compared to gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 of $1.1 million, or 9%. Gross profit percentages generally will increase/decrease as Clinical Service revenue increases/decreases. However, gross profit percentages will also fluctuate from period to period due to the mix of service and reimbursable revenues and costs.

• | Research and development expenses were approximately $20.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $19.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, representing an increase of approximately $1.7 million, or 9%.

◦ | Immuno-oncology - Immuno-oncology expenses, which are primarily associated with the Intus Phase 3 clinical trial for our lead immunotherapy product candidate CLBS20, were $8.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, representing an increase of $4.0 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

◦ | Ischemic Repair - Ischemic repair expenses were $6.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, representing a decrease of approximately $0.3 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease is primarily due lower expenses associated with the PreSERVE-AMI Phase 2 study for CLBS10, which were partially offset by expenses associated with a potential critical limb ischemia development program in Japan.

◦ | Immune Modulation - Immune modulation expenses, including our efforts focused on initiating our Phase 2 study of CLBS03 in T1D, were $2.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, representing a decrease of $2.1 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

◦ | Other - Other research and development expenses were $3.0 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and nine months ended September 30, 2014.

• | Impairment of intangible assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 relate to the full impairment of IPR&D associated with CLBS10 valued at $9.4 million, based on the Company's decision that it will not pursue further development of CLBS10 upon completion of the ongoing PreSERVE-AMI Phase 2 clinical study.

• | Selling, general and administrative expenses were approximately $25.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $24.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, representing an increase of approximately $0.7 million, or 3%. Equity-based compensation included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was approximately $6.4 million, compared to approximately $7.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, representing a decrease of $0.9 million. Equity-based compensation expense is expected to fluctuate in future quarters as equity-linked instruments are used to compensate employees, consultants and

29

Index
other service providers. Non-equity-based general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 were approximately $18.6 million, compared to approximately $17.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, representing an increase of $1.6 million. The increase was primarily related to expenses associated with executive management changes in the first quarter of 2015, including new hire compensation-related costs as well as separation-related costs during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. In addition, the increase reflects additional operating activities in connection with the CSC Acquisition in May 2014.
Historically, to minimize our use of cash, we have used a variety of equity and equity-linked instruments to compensate employees, consultants and other service providers. The use of these instruments has resulted in charges to the results of operations, which have been significant in the past.
Other Income (Expense)
Other expense, net, for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was $0.4 million and other income, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 were $4.4 million, compared with other expense, net, of $0.7 million and $1.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, and primarily relates to changes in the estimated fair value of our contingent consideration liabilities. The nine months ended September 30, 2015 amounts include the revaluation of the Amorcyte Acquisition-related contingent consideration related to CLBS10 from $5.6 million to $0, based on the Company's decision that it will not pursue further development of CLBS10 upon completion of the ongoing PreSERVE-AMI Phase 2 clinical study.
Interest expense was $0.6 million and $1.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, compared with $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. The increase was primarily due to interest expense associated with the $15.0 million loan from Oxford Finance LLC in September 2014 (the "Loan").
Provision (benefit) for Income Taxes
The benefit from income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 relates primarily to the reversal of the deferred tax liability of $3.7 million associated with the impairment of the IPR&D intangible asset valued at $9.4 million. The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 also includes the taxable temporary differences on the goodwill recognized in the PCT acquisition in 2011, which is being amortized over 15 years for tax purposes. A tax provision will continue to be recognized each period over the amortization period, and will only reverse when the goodwill is eliminated through a sale, impairment, or reclassification from an indefinite-lived asset to a finite-lived asset.
Analysis of Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2015 we had cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities of approximately $29.4 million, working capital of approximately $18.7 million, and stockholders’ equity of approximately $55.4 million.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we met our immediate cash requirements through revenue generated from our PCT operations, net proceeds received from our public offering of our common stock in June 2015, the issuance of our common stock under our $30 million common stock purchase agreement with Aspire Capital (the "2014 Purchase Agreement"), and existing cash balances. Additionally, we used equity and equity-linked instruments to pay for services and compensation.
Net cash provided by or used in operating, investing and financing activities from continuing operations were as follows (in thousands):

| Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2015 |  | 2014
Net cash used in operating activities | $ | (30,530.6 | ) |  | $ | (35,991.2 | )
Net cash used in investing activities | (921.2 | ) |  | (3,547.4 | )
Net cash provided by financing activities | 36,320.4 |  |  | 25,546.1 |

Operating Activities
30

Index
Our cash used in operating activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 totaled approximately $30.5 million, which is the sum of (i) our net loss of $47.8 million, adjusted for non-cash expenses totaling $11.9 million (which includes adjustments for equity-based compensation, depreciation and amortization, impairments of intangible assets, and changes in acquisition-related contingent consideration liabilities and deferred tax liabilities), and (ii) changes in operating assets and liabilities providing approximately $5.3 million.
Our cash used in operating activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 totaled approximately $36.0 million, which is the sum of (i) our net loss of $43.8 million, adjusted for non-cash expenses totaling $11.7 million (which includes adjustments for equity-based compensation, depreciation and amortization, and changes in acquisition-related contingent consideration liabilities), and (ii) changes in operating assets and liabilities providing approximately $3.9 million.
Investing Activities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we spent approximately $2.6 million for property and equipment. In addition, we sold (net of purchases) approximately $1.7 million marketable securities available for sale.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we spent approximately $2.9 million for property and equipment, and purchased (net of sales) approximately $0.7 million in marketable securities.
Financing Activities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, our financing activities consisted of the following:

• | We raised $28.8 million (or $26.5 million in net proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses) through an underwritten offering of 14.4 million shares of common stock at a public offering price of $2.00 per share.

• | We raised gross proceeds of approximately $9.4 million through the issuance of approximately 3.0 million shares of common stock under the provisions of the 2014 Purchase Agreement with Aspire Capital, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company ("Aspire Capital").

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, our financing activities consisted of the following:

• | We raised gross proceeds of approximately $15.0 million from loan proceeds from Oxford Finance LLC in September 2014. In connection with the loan, we repaid all outstanding amounts due under two loans from TD Bank, N.A. in the amount of approximately $3.1 million. In addition, debt offering/issuance costs of $0.5 million were paid in connection with the loan.

• | We raised gross proceeds of approximately $11.2 million through the issuance of approximately 1.7 million shares of common stock under the provisions of our equity line of credit with Aspire.

• | We raised approximately $2.0 million from the exercise warrants and options.

• | We received proceeds of $1.8 million from the issuance of notes payable relating to certain insurance policies and equipment financings, less repayments of $0.7 million.

Liquidity and Capital Requirements Outlook
Liquidity
We anticipate requiring additional capital in order to fund the development of cell therapy product candidates, particularly in our Immuno-oncology and Immune Modulation Programs, as well as to engage in strategic transactions. The most significant funding needs are anticipated to be in connection with the conduct of our Intus study, which is expected to cost approximately $45 million in total (or $28 million, net of the $17.7 million grant awarded by California Institute for Regenerative Medicine ("CIRM") in June 2015 to fund a significant portion of the Intus study). As of September 30, 2015, remaining costs on the Intus study are estimated to be approximately $36 million (or $22 million, net of the remaining $14.7 million CIRM funding not yet received). We also anticipate requiring additional capital to grow the PCT business, including implementing additional automation
31

Index
capabilities and pursuing plans to establish commercial capacity, harmonize operations across locations, strengthen quality systems and expand internationally.
To meet our short and long term liquidity needs, we currently expect to use existing cash balances, our revenue generating activities, and a variety of other means. Those other means include the common stock purchase agreement with Aspire Capital (the "Purchase Agreement") signed in November 2015, whereby we can sell to Aspire Capital the lesser of (i) $30.0 million of Common Stock or (ii) the dollar value of approximately 11.0 million shares of Common Stock based on the market price of the Common Stock at the time of such sale as determined under the Purchase Agreement, as well as proceeds from the CIRM award, which provided for a $3.0 million project initiation payment received in June 2015, and $14.7 million in future operational milestone payments, and is subject to a dollar-for-dollar match funding by the Company.
In September 2014, we entered into a loan and security agreement with Oxford Finance LLC and received $15.0 million in gross proceeds. The Company has been making interest-only payments on the outstanding amount of the Loan on a monthly basis at a rate of 8.50% per annum, and will continue interest-only payments until April 1, 2016. Commencing on April 1, 2016, the Company will make 30 consecutive monthly payments of principal and interest. The Loan matures on September 1, 2018. In June 2015, we raised $28.8 million (or $26.5 million in net proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses) through an underwritten offering of 14.4 million shares of common stock at a public offering price of $2.00 per share. Other sources of liquidity could include additional potential issuances of equity securities in public or private financings, option exercises, partnerships and/or collaborations, and/or sale of assets. In addition, we expect to continue to seek as appropriate grants for scientific and clinical studies from CIRM, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense, and other U.S. and foreign governmental agencies and foundations. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in qualifying for or obtaining such grants. Our history of operating losses and liquidity challenges may make it difficult for us to raise capital on acceptable terms or at all. The demand for the equity and debt of biopharmaceutical companies like ours is dependent upon many factors, including the general state of the financial markets. During times of extreme market volatility, capital may not be available on favorable terms, or at all. Our inability to obtain such additional capital could materially and adversely affect our business operations. We believe that our current cash balances and revenue generating activities, along with access to the Purchase Agreement, will be sufficient to fund the business through the next 12 months.
While we continue to seek capital through a number of means, there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, and our negotiating position in capital generating efforts may worsen as existing resources are used. Additional equity financing may be dilutive to our stockholders; debt financing, if available, may involve significant cash payment obligations and covenants that restrict our ability to operate as a business; our stock price may not reach levels necessary to induce option or warrant exercises; and asset sales may not be possible on terms we consider acceptable. If we are unable to raise the funds necessary to meet our long-term liquidity needs, we may have to delay or discontinue the acquisition and development of cell therapies, and/or the expansion of our business and we may have to curtail our operations.
Commitments and Contingencies
The following table summarizes our obligations to make future payments under current contracts as of September 30, 2015 (in thousands):
Payments Due Period

| Total |  | Less than 1 Year |  | 1-3 Years |  | 3-5 Years |  | More than 5 Years
Contractual Obligations |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Notes Payable | $ | 1,826.3 |  |  | $ | 1,012.2 |  |  | $ | 814.1 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |
Long Term Debt | 16,200.0 |  |  | 2,751.4 |  |  | 13,448.6 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Purchase Obligations | 583.8 |  |  | 333.6 |  |  | 250.2 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Operating Lease Obligations | 7,403.0 |  |  | 2,037.6 |  |  | 3,172.1 |  |  | 1,899.0 |  |  | 294.3 |
Total | $ | 26,013.1 |  |  | $ | 6,134.8 |  |  | $ | 17,685.0 |  |  | $ | 1,899 |  |  | $ | 294.3 |

Other significant commitments and contingencies include the following:

• | Under agreements with external clinical research organizations (“CROs”), we will incur expenses relating to our clinical trials for our therapeutic product candidates in development. The timing and amount of these expenses are based on

32

Index
performance of services rendered and expenses as incurred by the CROs and therefore, we cannot reasonably estimate the timing of these payments.

• | We have entered into a strategic collaboration with Sanford Research with the goal of developing a therapy for the treatment of T1D. The initial focus of the collaboration will be the execution of a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial (The Sanford Project: Trex Study) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Company’s T regulatory cell product candidate, CLBS03, in adolescents with recent onset T1D. The Phase 2 study has an open and active IND in place and subject enrollment is expected to commence as early as the first quarter of 2016. We will be initially responsible for the supply of all study drug to the first 18 enrolled patients upon commencement of the study.

• | Under certain license, collaboration, and merger agreements, we may be required to pay for research and development costs, and to pay royalties, milestone and/or other payments upon successful development and commercialization of products. However, successful research and development of pharmaceutical products is high risk, and most products fail to reach the market. Therefore, at this time the amount and timing of the payments related to commercialization of products, if any, are not known.

• | From time to time, we are subject to legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of pending claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the outcome of any pending claims will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or operating results.

Seasonality
The Company does not believe that its operations are seasonal in nature.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There have been no material changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to those reported in our 2014 Form 10-K.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Market risk is the risk of change in fair value of a financial instrument due to changes in interest rates, equity prices, creditworthiness, financing, exchange rates or other factors. Our primary market risk exposure relates to changes in interest rates. Our earnings and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in interest rates, principally in connection with our investments in marketable securities, which consist primarily of short-term money market funds and municipal debt securities. However, as of September 30, 2015, we do not believe we are materially exposed to changes in interest rates given the short-term duration of the securities. Additionally, our outstanding $15.0 million long-term loan with Oxford Finance LLC, representing our largest component of debt, has a fixed interest rate until 2018, and is not subject to interest rate exposure. As a result, we have no material exposure to market risk related to interest rate changes as of September 30, 2015.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are the Company’s controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Due to the inherent limitations of control systems, not all misstatements may be detected. These inherent
33

Index
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. Controls and procedures can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the above objectives have been met.
As of September 30, 2015, the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, at the reasonable assurance level, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15, that occurred during the Company’s last quarter to which this Quarterly Report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
34

Index
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
There are no material changes to the disclosures previously reported in our 2014 Form 10-K.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors previously reported in our 2014 Form 10-K. See the risk factors set forth in the Company's Annual Report on our 2014 Form 10-K under the caption "Item 1 A - Risk Factors".
Our future success is significantly dependent on the timely and successful development and commercialization of CLBS20, our metastatic melanoma product candidate, and if we encounter delays or difficulties in the development of this product candidate, as well as CLBS03, our T1D product candidate, that are at earlier stages of development, our business prospects would be significantly harmed.
We are dependent upon the successful development, approval and commercialization of our product candidates. Before we are able to seek regulatory approval of our product candidates, we must conduct and complete extensive clinical trials to demonstrate their safety and efficacy in humans. All of our product candidates are in early stages of development except for CLBS20 which is the subject of a Phase 3 clinical trial for recurrent stage III or stage IV metastatic melanoma for which we began initiating clinical sites in Q42014 and randomized the first patient in 2Q2015. We expect to complete enrollment of our Phase 3 Intus study in the fourth quarter of 2016.
We also plan to initiate in early 2016 a Phase 2 study of CLBS03, a Treg based therapeutic being developed to treat T1D. We are also actively exploring means by which we can take advantage of the paradigm of conditional approval for regenerative medicine products established by new regulations in Japan for products that show sufficient safety evidence and some evidence of efficacy with CLI and liver cancer being the indications we are considering. Clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, and can take many years to complete. Importantly, a failure of one or more of these or any other clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. We may experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, clinical trials that could delay or prevent our ability to complete our clinical studies, receive regulatory approval or commercialize our cell therapy product candidates, including the following:

• | suspensions, delays or changes in the design, initiation, enrollment, implementation or completion of required clinical trials;

• | adverse changes in our financial position or significant and unexpected increases in the cost of our clinical development program;

• | changes or uncertainties in, or additions to, the regulatory approval process that require us to alter our current development strategy;

• | clinical trial results that are negative, inconclusive or even less than desired as to safety and/or efficacy, which could result in the need for additional clinical studies or the termination of the product's development;

• | delays in our ability to manufacture the product in quantities or in a form that is suitable for any required clinical trials;

• | intellectual property constraints that prevent us from making, using, or commercializing any of our cell therapy product candidates;

• | the supply or quality of our product candidates or other materials necessary to conduct clinical trials of these product candidates may be insufficient or inadequate:

• | inability to generate sufficient preclinical, toxicology, or other in vivo or in vitro data to support the initiation of clinical studies;

• | delays in reaching agreement on acceptable terms with prospective contract research organizations, or CROs, and clinical study sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and clinical study sites;

• | delays in obtaining required Institutional Review Board, or IRB, approval at each clinical study site;

• | imposition of a temporary or permanent clinical hold by regulatory agencies for a number of reasons, including after review of an investigational new drug application or amendment, or equivalent application or amendment; as a result of a new safety finding that presents unreasonable risk to clinical trial participants; a negative finding from an inspection of our clinical study operations or study sites; developments on trials conducted by competitors or approved products

35

Index
post‑market for related technology that raises FDA concerns about risk to patients of the technology broadly; or if FDA finds that the investigational protocol or plan is clearly deficient to meet its stated objectives;

• | difficulty collaborating with patient groups and investigators;

• | failure by our CROs, other third parties, or us to adhere to clinical study requirements;

• | failure to perform in accordance with the FDA’s good clinical practices, or GCPs, requirements, or applicable regulatory guidelines in other countries;

• | delays in having patients qualify for or complete participation in a study or return for post-treatment follow-up;

• | patients dropping out of a study;

• | occurrence of adverse events associated with the product candidate that are viewed to outweigh its potential benefits;

• | changes in the standard of care on which a clinical development plan was based, which may require altered, amended, new or additional trials;

• | transfer of manufacturing processes from our academic collaborators to larger-scale facilities operated by either a contract manufacturing organization, or CMO, or by us, and delays or failure of our CMOs or us to make any necessary changes to such manufacturing process;

• | delays in manufacturing, testing, releasing, validating, or importing/exporting sufficient stable quantities of our product candidates for use in clinical studies or the inability to do any of the foregoing; and

• | FDA may not accept clinical data from trials that are conducted at clinical sites in countries where the standard of care is potentially different from the United States.

Any inability to successfully complete preclinical and clinical development could result in additional costs to us or impair our ability to generate revenue. In addition, if we make manufacturing or formulation changes to our product candidates, we may be required to or we may elect to conduct additional studies to bridge our modified product candidates to earlier versions. Clinical study delays could also shorten any periods during which our products have patent protection and may allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do, which could impair our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates and may harm our business and results of operations.
In the Phase 2 clinical trial of CLBS20 in metastatic melanoma serious adverse events included AMI, seizures, and acute myelogenous leukemia. However, the events in the trial were judged as unrelated to study participation by the investigator.
The Phase 2 study of CLBS20 in metastatic melanoma originally was designed to include 200 patients. However, the study was terminated early due to funding issues faced by the prior owner of CLBS20; as a result, a final analysis was conducted of 42 patients who had been randomized and received either tumor cells (TC) or dendritic cells loaded with tumor cell antigens (DC-TC).
Creation of CLBS20, our cancer vaccine for melanoma, is based on a complex process that involves, among other things, the growing out in culture of cancer initiating cells for each patient until a sufficient number of purified cells have been obtained for the treatment, which is the first step to potential randomization into the Intus Phase 3 clinical trial. If we experience problems with the manufacture of CLBS20, our Phase 3 clinical trial could be delayed.
Even if we are able to successfully complete our clinical development program for our product candidates, and ultimately receive regulatory approval to market one or more of the products, we may, among other things:

• | obtain approval for indications that are not as broad as the indications we sought;

• | have the product removed from the market after obtaining marketing approval;

• | encounter issues with respect to the manufacturing of commercial supplies;

• | be subject to additional post-marketing testing requirements; and/or

• | be subject to restrictions on how the product is distributed or used.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
On August 20, 2015, in consideration for services previously rendered, the Company agreed to issue to a service firm, 21,600 shares of the Company's restricted common stock vesting 3,600 immediately upon issuance, and 3,600 in each of the following five months.
The offer and sale by the Company of the securities described above were made in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. The offer and sale of such securities were made without general solicitation or advertising to “accredited investors” as such term is defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act and/or
36

Index
pursuant to Regulation D and may not be resold in the United States or to U.S. persons unless registered under the Securities Act or pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
Common Stock Purchase Agreement
On November 4, 2015, the Company entered into a common stock purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Aspire Capital Fund, LLC, (“Aspire Capital”), pursuant to which Aspire Capital is committed to purchase up to an aggregate of $30.0 million of shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Purchase Shares”). The Company and Aspire Capital are parties to two prior Common Stock Purchase Agreements, the latest was entered into on May 4, 2015 .
Summary of Terms of the Purchase Agreement
On any business day after the May 4, 2015 and over the 24-month term of the Purchase Agreement, the Company has the right, in its sole discretion, to present Aspire Capital with a purchase notice (each, a “Purchase Notice”) directing Aspire Capital to purchase up to 50,000 Purchase Shares per business day; however, no sale pursuant to such a Purchase Notice may exceed five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) per business day, unless the Company and Aspire Capital mutually agree. The Company and Aspire Capital also may mutually agree to increase the number of shares that may be sold to as much as an additional 2,000,000 Purchase Shares per business day. The purchase price per Purchase Share pursuant to such Purchase Notice (the “Purchase Price”) is the lower of (i) the lowest sale price for the Company’s common stock on the date of sale or (ii) the average of the three lowest closing sale prices for the Company’s common stock during the 12 consecutive business days ending on the business day immediately preceding the purchase date. The applicable Purchase Price will be determined prior to delivery of any Purchase Notice.
In addition, on any date on which the Company submits a Purchase Notice to Aspire Capital for at least 50,000 Purchase Shares, the Company also has the right, in its sole discretion, to present Aspire Capital with a volume-weighted average price purchase notice (each, a “VWAP Purchase Notice”) directing Aspire Capital to purchase an amount of the Company’s common stock equal to up to 30% of the aggregate shares of common stock traded on the next business day (the “VWAP Purchase Date”), subject to a maximum number of shares determined by the Company (the “VWAP Purchase Share Volume Maximum”). The purchase price per Purchase Share pursuant to such VWAP Purchase Notice (the “VWAP Purchase Price”) shall be 95% of the volume weighted average price for the Company’s common stock traded on (i) the VWAP Purchase Date if the aggregate shares to be purchased on that date does not exceed the VWAP Purchase Share Volume Maximum, or (ii) the portion of such business day until such time as the aggregate shares to be purchased will equal the VWAP Purchase Share Volume Maximum. Further, if on the VWAP Purchase Date the sale price of the Company’s common stock falls below the greater of (i) 80% of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the business day immediately preceding the VWAP Purchase Date or (ii) the price set by the Company in the VWAP Purchase Notice (the “VWAP Minimum Price Threshold”), the VWAP Purchase Amount will be determined using the percentage in the VWAP Purchase Notice of the total shares traded for such portion of the VWAP Purchase Date prior to the time that the sale price of the Company’s common stock fell below the VWAP Minimum Price Threshold and the VWAP Purchase Price will be 95% of the volume weighted average price of our common stock sold during such portion of the VWAP Purchase Date prior to the time that the sale price of our common stock fell below the VWAP Minimum Price Threshold.
The number of Purchase Shares covered by and timing of each Purchase Notice or VWAP Purchase Notice are determined at the Company’s discretion. The aggregate number of shares that the Company can sell to Aspire Capital under the Purchase Agreement may in no case exceed 11,019,276 shares of our common stock (which is equal to approximately 19.9% of the common stock outstanding on the date of the Purchase Agreement, including the 842,696 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Commitment Shares”) to be issued to Aspire Capital in consideration for entering into the Purchase Agreement) (the “Exchange Cap”), unless (i) shareholder approval is obtained to issue more, in which case the Exchange Cap will not apply, or (ii) stockholder approval has not been obtained and at any time the Exchange Cap is reached and at all times thereafter the average price paid for all shares issued under the Purchase Agreement (including the Commitment Shares) is equal to or greater than $1.35 (the “Minimum
37

Index
Price”), a price equal to the consolidated closing bid price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the Purchase Agreement; provided that at no time shall Aspire Capital (together with its affiliates) beneficially own more than 19.9% of the Company’s common stock.
The Purchase Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants, closing conditions and indemnification and termination provisions. The Purchase Agreement may be terminated by the Company at any time, at its discretion, without any cost or penalty.
The Company’s net proceeds will depend on the Purchase Price, the VWAP Purchase Price and the frequency of the Company’s sales of Purchase Shares to Aspire Capital; subject to the maximum $30.0 million available amount. The Company’s delivery of Purchase Notices and VWAP Purchase Notices will be made subject to market conditions, in light of the Company’s capital needs from time to time. The Company expects to use proceeds from sales of Purchase Shares for general corporate purposes and working capital requirements.
Registration Rights
In connection with the Purchase Agreement, the Company also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with Aspire Capital, dated November 4, 2015. The Registration Rights Agreement provides, among other things, that the Company will register the sale of the Commitment Shares and the Purchase Shares to Aspire Capital pursuant to the Company’s existing shelf registration statement or a new registration statement (the “Registration Statement”). The Company further agreed to keep the Registration Statement effective and to indemnify Aspire Capital for certain liabilities in connection with the sale of the Securities under the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement.
The foregoing descriptions of the Purchase Agreement and the Registration Rights Agreement are not complete and are qualified by reference to the full text of such documents, copies of which are filed as Exhibits 10.3 and 4.1, respectively, to this Quarterly Report and are incorporated herein by reference. The representations and warranties contained in the Purchase Agreement, which are qualified by the disclosure schedules thereto, are solely for the purpose of allocating contractual risk between the parties, are not for the benefit of any party other than the parties to such agreements and are not intended as documents for investors and the public to obtain factual information about the current state of affairs of the parties thereto. Rather, investors and the public should look to other disclosures contained in the Company’s filings with the SEC.
38

Index
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The Exhibit Index appearing immediately after the signature page to this Form 10-Q is incorporated herein by reference.
39

Index
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

|  | CALADRIUS BIOSCIENCES, INC.
November 5, 2015 |  | By: /s/ David J. Mazzo, PhD Name: David J. Mazzo, PhD Title: Chief Executive Officer
November 5, 2015 |  | By: /s/ Joseph Talamo Name: Joseph Talamo Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

40

Index
CALADRIUS BIOSCIENCES, INC.
FORM 10Q
Exhibit Index

3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Caladrius Biosciences, Inc., filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on October 3, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 3, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2 | Amended and Restated By-Laws dated January 5, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on January 5, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.1* | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2015, by and between Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. and Aspire Capital Fund, LLC.
5.1* | Opinion of Paul Hastings LLP
10.1 | Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. 2015 Equity Compensation Plan (filed as Annex A to Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement filed on Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on June 8, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2* | Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated September 15, 2015, by and between Caladrius Biosciences, Inc., and Oxford Finance LLC.
10.3* | Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2015, by and between Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. and Aspire Capital Fund, LLC.
23.1* | Consent of Paul Hastings LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).
31.1* | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2* | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1** | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2** | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

_______________

* | Filed herewith.
** | Furnished herewith.

41