XML 35 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.19.1

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2018
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS |
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS | 8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS Pursuant to ASC 820, the Company’s determination of fair value incorporates not only the credit standing of the counterparties involved in transactions with the Company resulting in receivables on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, but also the impact of the Company’s nonperformance risk on its own liabilities. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy assigns the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). Level 2 measurements are inputs that are observable for assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly, other than quoted prices included within Level 1. The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. The Company classifies fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. As required by ASC 820, a financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. There were no transfers between fair value hierarchy levels for any period presented. The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):
|  | December 31, 2018
|  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total
Assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Receivables from derivative contracts |  | $ | — |  | $ | 69,717 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 69,717
Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Liabilities from derivative contracts |  | $ | — |  | $ | 12,907 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 12,907
|  | December 31, 2017
|  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total
Assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Receivables from derivative contracts |  | $ | — |  | $ | 677 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 677
Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Liabilities from derivative contracts |  | $ | — |  | $ | 26,999 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 26,999
Derivative contracts listed above as Level 2 include collars, puts, calls, fixed-price swaps and basis swaps that are carried at fair value. The Company records the net change in the fair value of these positions in “Net gain (loss) on derivative contracts” in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The Company is able to value the assets and liabilities based on observable market data for similar instruments, which resulted in the Company reporting its derivatives as Level 2. This observable data includes the forward curves for commodity prices based on quoted markets prices and implied volatility factors related to changes in the forward curves. See Note 9, “Derivative and Hedging Activities,” for additional discussion of derivatives. The Company’s derivative contracts are with major financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings which are believed to have minimal credit risk. As such, the Company is exposed to credit risk to the extent of nonperformance by the counterparties in the derivative contracts; however, the Company does not anticipate such nonperformance. The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the requirements of ASC 825, Financial Instruments. The estimated fair value amounts have been determined at discrete points in time based on relevant market information. These estimates involve uncertainties and cannot be determined with precision. The estimated fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates their carrying value due to their short‑term nature. The estimated fair value of the Company’s Senior Credit Agreement approximates carrying value because the interest rates approximate current market rates. The following table presents the estimated fair values of the Company’s fixed interest rate, long‑term debt instruments as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 (excluding discounts, premiums and debt issuance costs) (in thousands):
|  | December 31, 2018 |  | December 31, 2017
|  | Principal |  | Estimated |  | Principal |  | Estimated
Debt |  | Amount |  | Fair Value |  | Amount |  | Fair Value
6.75% senior notes |  | $ | 625,005 |  | $ | 458,210 |  | $ | 425,005 |  | $ | 443,790
The fair value of the Company’s fixed interest debt instruments was calculated using Level 1 criteria. The fair value of the Company’s senior notes is based on quoted market prices from trades of such debt. On February 28, 2017, the Company closed the Pecos County Acquisition and recorded the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their acquisition date fair values. See Note 5, “Acquisitions and Divestitures,” for a discussion of the fair value approaches used by the Company and the classification of the estimates within the fair value hierarchy. On September 9, 2016, the Company emerged from chapter 11 bankruptcy and adopted fresh-start accounting, which resulted in the Company becoming a new entity for financial reporting purposes. Upon the adoption of fresh-start accounting, the Company’s assets and liabilities were recorded at their fair values as of the fresh-start reporting date, September 9, 2016. See Note 3, “Fresh-start Accounting,” for a detailed discussion of the fair value approaches used by the Company. For the period from January 1, 2016 through September 9, 2016, the Predecessor Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $28.1 million related to its gas gathering infrastructure. See Note 1, “Financial Statement Presentation,” for a discussion of the valuation approach used and the classification of the estimate within the fair value hierarchy. The Company follows the provisions of ASC 820, for nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non‑recurring basis. These provisions apply to the Company’s initial recognition of asset retirement obligations for which fair value is used. The asset retirement obligation estimates are derived from historical costs and management’s expectation of future cost environments; consequently, the Company has designated these liabilities as Level 3. See Note 10, “Asset Retirement Obligations,” for a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the liability for the Company’s asset retirement obligations.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 820 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2155941 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration