Note 6 – Fair Value Considerations

Aytu’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, convertible promissory notes and warrant derivative liability. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value due to their short maturities. The fair value of the convertible notes was approximately the face value of the notes (see Note 8 for more information). The valuation policies are determined by the Chief Financial Officer and approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.

Authoritative guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of Aytu. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect Aytu’s assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on reliability of the inputs as follows:

Level 1:	Inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible to Aytu for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2:	Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active or inactive markets or that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3:	Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity.

Aytu’s assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to their fair value measurement. Aytu’s policy is to recognize transfers in and/or out of fair value hierarchy as of the date in which the event or change in circumstances caused the transfer. Aytu has consistently applied the valuation techniques discussed below in all periods presented.

The following table presents Aytu’s financial liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2016, by level within the fair value hierarchy:

	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total

March 31, 2016
LIABILITIES
Warrant derivative liability	$	-	$	-	$	66,000	$	66,000

The warrant derivative liability for the warrants was valued using the Monte Carlo valuation methodology because that model embodies all of the relevant assumptions that address the features underlying these instruments. Significant assumptions in valuing the warrant derivative liability, based on estimates of the value of Aytu common stock and various factors regarding the warrants, were as follows as of March 31, 2016 and at issuance:

	March 31, 2016			At Issuance

Warrants:
Exercise price	$	0.64			$1.51 - $1.95
Volatility		75.0	%		75.0	%
Equivalent term (years)		4.31 - 4.36			5.0 - 5.11
Risk-free interest rate		1.09% - 1.10%			1.54% - 1.74%
Potential number of shares		159,000 - 228,000			139,000 - 224,000

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of financial liabilities classified as Level 3 in the fair valued hierarchy:

	Derivative Instruments

Balance as of June 30, 2015	$	-
Warrant issuances		103,000
Reclassification of warrant liability to equity upon note conversion		(87,000)
Change in fair value included in earnings		50,000
Balance as of March 31, 2016	$	66,000