XML 35 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.7.0.1

Fair Value Considerations | 6 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended
--- | --- | ---
Dec. 31, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract] |  |
Fair Value Consideration [Text Block] | Note 5 – Fair Value Considerations Aytu’s financial instruments include cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, accounts receivable, investments, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and warrant derivative liability. The carrying amounts of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value due to their short maturities. The valuation policies are determined by the Chief Financial Officer and approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. Authoritative guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of Aytu. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect Aytu’s assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on reliability of the inputs as follows:
Level 1: | Inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible to Aytu for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2: | Inputs that include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active or inactive markets or that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3: | Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity.
Aytu’s assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to their fair value measurement. Aytu’s policy is to recognize transfers in and/or out of fair value hierarchy as of the date in which the event or change in circumstances caused the transfer. Aytu has consistently applied the valuation techniques discussed below in all periods presented. The following table presents Aytu’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016, by level within the fair value hierarchy:
|  | Fair Value Measurements Using |
|  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total |
December 31, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Investment in Acerus |  | $ | 1,272,000 |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | 1,272,000 |
LIABILITIES |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Warrant derivative liability |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | 80,000 |  | $ | 80,000 |
Contingent consideration |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | 4,003,000 |  | $ | 4,003,000 |
June 30, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Investment in Acerus |  | $ | 1,041,000 |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | 1,041,000 |
LIABILITIES |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Warrant derivative liability |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | 276,000 |  | $ | 276,000 |
Contingent consideration |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | 3,869,000 |  | $ | 3,869,000 |
The estimated fair value of the Company’s investment in Acerus, which is classified as Level 1 (quoted price is available), was $1,272,000 as of December 31, 2016. The estimated fair value of the Company’s marketable securities is determined using the quoted price in the active market based on the closing price as of the balance sheet date.
|  |  |  |  |  |  | Unrealized |  |  |  |
As of December 31, 2016 |  | Maturity in Years |  | Value at June 30, 2016 |  | Gains |  | Losses |  | Fair Value |
Investment in Acerus |  | Less than 1 year |  | $ | 1,041,000 |  | $ | 231,000 |  | $ |  |  | $ | 1,272,000 |
The warrant derivative liability was valued using the Black-Scholes valuation methodology because that model embodies all of the relevant assumptions that address the features underlying these instruments. The warrants related to the warrant derivative liability are not actively traded and therefore classified as Level 3. Significant assumptions in valuing the warrant derivative liability, based on estimates of the value of Aytu common stock and various factors regarding the warrants, were as follows as of December 31, 2016 and at issuance:
|  | December 31, 2016 |  | At Issuance |
Warrants: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Volatility |  |  | 186.7 | % |  | 75.0 | %
Equivalent term (years) |  |  | 4.34 |  |  | 5.00 |
Risk-free interest rate |  |  | 1.33 | % |  | 1.32 | %
Dividend yield |  |  | 0.00 | % |  | 0.00 | %
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of financial liabilities classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy:
|  | Derivative Instruments |
Balance as of June 30, 2016 |  | $ | 276,000 |
Warrant issuances |  |  | - |
Change in fair value included in earnings |  |  | (196,000) |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 |  | $ | 80,000 |
| Note 5 – Fair Value Considerations Aytu’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, convertible promissory notes and warrant derivative liability. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value due to their short maturities. The fair value of the convertible notes was approximately the face value of the notes (see Note 8 for more information). The valuation policies are determined by the Chief Financial Officer and approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. Authoritative guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of Aytu. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect Aytu’s assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on reliability of the inputs as follows:
| Level 1: | Inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible to Aytu for identical assets or liabilities;
| Level 2: | Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active or inactive markets or that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly; and
| Level 3: | Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity.
Aytu’s assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to their fair value measurement. Aytu’s policy is to recognize transfers in and/or out of fair value hierarchy as of the date in which the event or change in circumstances caused the transfer. Aytu has consistently applied the valuation techniques discussed below in all periods presented. The following table presents Aytu’s financial liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2016, by level within the fair value hierarchy:
|  | Fair Value Measurements Using |
|  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total |
June 30, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Investment in Acerus |  | $ | 1,041,000 |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | 1,041,000 |
LIABILITIES |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Warrant derivative liability |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | 276,000 |  | $ | 276,000 |
Contingent consideration |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | 3,869,000 |  | $ | 3,869,000 |
June 30, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Investment in Acerus |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |
LIABILITIES |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Warrant derivative liability |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |
Contingent consideration |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | 664,000 |  | $ | 664,000 |
The estimated fair value of the Company’s investment, which is classified as Level 1 (quoted price is available), was $1,041,000 as of June 30, 2016. The estimated fair value of the Company’s marketable securities is determined using the quoted price in the active market based on the closing price as of the balance sheet date.
|  |  |  | Initial |  | Unrealized |  |  |  |
As of June 30, 2016 |  | Maturity in Years |  | Cost |  | Gains |  | Losses |  | Fair Value |
Investment in Acerus |  | Less than 1 year |  | $ | 2,013,000 |  | $ | 0 |  | $ | (972,000) |  | $ | 1,041,000 |
The warrant derivative liability for the warrants was valued using the Black-Scholes valuation methodology because that model embodies all of the relevant assumptions that address the features underlying these instruments. Significant assumptions in valuing the warrant derivative liability were based on estimates of the value of Aytu common stock, the exercise price of $6.00, the term of 5 years, volatility of 75% and a risk free interest rate of 1.32% at issuance. At June 30, 2016, these warrants were re-valued with an adjusted term of 4.84 years, volatility of 75% and a risk free interest rate of 0.986%. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of financial liabilities classified as Level 3 in the fair valued hierarchy:
|  | Derivative Instruments |
Balance as of June 30, 2015 |  | $ | - |
Warrant issuances |  |  | 400,000 |
Reclassification of warrant liability to equity upon note conversion |  |  | (137,000) |
Change in fair value included in earnings |  |  | 13,000 |
Balance as of June 30, 2016 |  | $ | 276,000 |

X
- Definition Fair value consideration. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | aytu_FairValueConsiderationTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | aytu_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration