Commitments and Contingencies	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2019
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	Note 8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Loss Contingencies A number of actions have been commenced against us by vendors, landlords and former landlords, including a third party claim as a result of an injury suffered on a portion of a leased property not occupied by us. As certain of these claims represent amounts included in accounts payable they are not specifically discussed herein. Westbury Park Associates, LLC commenced an action on or about January 11, 2017 against Air Industries Group in the NYS Supreme Court, County of Suffolk, seeking the recovery of approximately $31,000 for past rent arrears, and for an unidentified sum representing all additional rent due under an alleged commercial lease through the end of its term, plus attorney's fees. The Company believes that it has a meritorious defense, as there was no lease on the property and that its subsidiary Compac Development Corp was a hold-over tenant occupying the space on month-to-month tenancy. An employee of the Company commenced an action against, among others, Rechler Equity B-2, LLC and Air Industries Group, in the Supreme Court State of New York, Suffolk County, seeking compensation in an undetermined amount for injuries suffered while leaving the premises occupied by Welding Metallurgy, Inc. Rechler Equity B-2, LLC, has served a Third Party Complaint in this action against Air Industries Group, Inc. and Welding Metallurgy, Inc. The action remains in the early pleading stage. The Company believes it is not liable to the employee and any amount it might have to pay would be covered by insurance. An employee of the Company commenced an action against, among others, Sterling Engineering and Air Industries Group, in Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, seeking lost wages in an undetermined amount for the employee's termination. The action remains in the early pleading stage. The Company believes it is not liable to the employee and any amount it might have to pay would be covered by insurance. Contract Pharmacal Corp. commenced an action on October 2, 2018, relating to a Sublease entered into l in May 2018 with respect to the property we at 110 Plant Avenue, Hauppauge, New York. In the action Contract Pharmacal seeks damages for an amount in excess of $1,000,000 for the Company's failure to make the entire premises available by the Sublease commencement date. The Company disputes the validity of the claims asserted by Contract Pharmacal and believes it has meritorious defenses to those claims and recently submitted a motion in opposition to its motion for summary judgement. On October 15, 2018, a complaint was filed by a stockholder of the Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Michael Kishmoian vs. Air Industries et al Case No. 18cv5757) naming the Company and certain of its directors and a former director. The Complaint alleges that the proxy statement for the Company's 2017 Annual Meeting contained false and misleading misstatements relating to whether brokers had discretionary authority to vote the shares of their customers in connection with the proposal to increase the number of shares the Company is authorized to issue (the "2017 Charter Amendment"). In the Complaint the plaintiff seeks to void the amendment and rescind any shares issued using the shares authorized by the amendment. The Company's Board of Directors has adopted an amendment to further increase the number of shares of Common Stock they are authorized to issue (the "2019 Charter Amendment"), subject to stockholder approval at the Company's 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is scheduled for June 25, 2019. Counsel to the Company's insurance carrier has advised counsel to the plaintiff of the proposed amendment. The Company believes that approval of the 2019 Charter Amendment will remove any issues concerning its ability to issue shares of Common Stock, or the validity of shares issued in excess of the 25,000,000 authorized pursuant to the adoption of the 2017 Charter Amendment and that any amount the Company may pay to resolve this action will not be material. From time to time the Company also may be engaged in various lawsuits and legal proceedings in the ordinary course of the Company's business. The Company is currently not aware of any legal proceedings the ultimate outcome of which, in our judgment based on information currently available, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results. The Company, however, have had claims brought against them by a number of vendors due to their liquidity constraints. There are no proceedings in which any of their directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial stockholder of the Company's common stock, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to the Company's interest.

Commitments and Contingencies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Note 8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Loss Contingencies

A number of actions have been commenced against us by vendors, landlords and former landlords, including a third party claim as a result of an injury suffered on a portion of a leased property not occupied by us. As certain of these claims represent amounts included in accounts payable they are not specifically discussed herein.

Westbury Park Associates, LLC commenced an action on or about January 11, 2017 against Air Industries Group in the NYS Supreme Court, County of Suffolk, seeking the recovery of approximately $31,000 for past rent arrears, and for an unidentified sum representing all additional rent due under an alleged commercial lease through the end of its term, plus attorney's fees. The Company believes that it has a meritorious defense, as there was no lease on the property and that its subsidiary Compac Development Corp was a hold-over tenant occupying the space on month-to-month tenancy.

An employee of the Company commenced an action against, among others, Rechler Equity B-2, LLC and Air Industries Group, in the Supreme Court State of New York, Suffolk County, seeking compensation in an undetermined amount for injuries suffered while leaving the premises occupied by Welding Metallurgy, Inc. Rechler Equity B-2, LLC, has served a Third Party Complaint in this action against Air Industries Group, Inc. and Welding Metallurgy, Inc. The action remains in the early pleading stage. The Company believes it is not liable to the employee and any amount it might have to pay would be covered by insurance.

An employee of the Company commenced an action against, among others, Sterling Engineering and Air Industries Group, in Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, seeking lost wages in an undetermined amount for the employee's termination. The action remains in the early pleading stage. The Company believes it is not liable to the employee and any amount it might have to pay would be covered by insurance.

Contract Pharmacal Corp. commenced an action on October 2, 2018, relating to a Sublease entered into l in May 2018 with respect to the property we at 110 Plant Avenue, Hauppauge, New York. In the action Contract Pharmacal seeks damages for an amount in excess of $1,000,000 for the Company's failure to make the entire premises available by the Sublease commencement date. The Company disputes the validity of the claims asserted by Contract Pharmacal and believes it has meritorious defenses to those claims and recently submitted a motion in opposition to its motion for summary judgement.

On October 15, 2018, a complaint was filed by a stockholder of the Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Michael Kishmoian vs. Air Industries et al Case No. 18cv5757) naming the Company and certain of its directors and a former director. The Complaint alleges that the proxy statement for the Company's 2017 Annual Meeting contained false and misleading misstatements relating to whether brokers had discretionary authority to vote the shares of their customers in connection with the proposal to increase the number of shares the Company is authorized to issue (the "2017 Charter Amendment"). In the Complaint the plaintiff seeks to void the amendment and rescind any shares issued using the shares authorized by the amendment. The Company's Board of Directors has adopted an amendment to further increase the number of shares of Common Stock they are authorized to issue (the "2019 Charter Amendment"), subject to stockholder approval at the Company's 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is scheduled for June 25, 2019. Counsel to the Company's insurance carrier has advised counsel to the plaintiff of the proposed amendment. The Company believes that approval of the 2019 Charter Amendment will remove any issues concerning its ability to issue shares of Common Stock, or the validity of shares issued in excess of the 25,000,000 authorized pursuant to the adoption of the 2017 Charter Amendment and that any amount the Company may pay to resolve this action will not be material.

From time to time the Company also may be engaged in various lawsuits and legal proceedings in the ordinary course of the Company's business. The Company is currently not aware of any legal proceedings the ultimate outcome of which, in our judgment based on information currently available, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results. The Company, however, have had claims brought against them by a number of vendors due to their liquidity constraints. There are no proceedings in which any of their directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial stockholder of the Company's common stock, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to the Company's interest.