XML 29 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.25.1

Commitments and Contingencies | 3 Months Ended
--- | ---
Mar. 31, 2025
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract] |
Commitments and Contingencies | Note 13 Commitments and Contingencies: Leases The Company recognizes right-of-use assets (“ROU assets”) and operating lease liabilities when it obtains the right to control an asset under a leasing arrangement with an initial term greater than 12 months. The Company adopted the short-term accounting election for leases with a duration of less than one year. The Company leases its facilities and certain IT and office equipment under non-cancellable operating leases. All of the Company’s leasing arrangements are classified as operating leases with remaining lease terms ranging from one to five years. In March 2024, the Company terminated the existing lease for its California facility and concurrently executed a new lease that effectively extended the term of the lease for five years, which has been accounted for as a lease modification. The ROU asset and operating lease liability were remeasured at the modification date, resulting in an increase to both balances of $1.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2024. There were no lease modifications during the three months ended March 31, 2025. Operating lease costs were $0.1 million for each of the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024. Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was $0.1 million for each of the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024. As of March 31, 2025, the weighted average incremental borrowing rate was 12.29% and the weighted average remaining lease term was 4.0 years. The following table summarizes the Company’s operating lease maturities as of March 31, 2025 (in thousands):
2025 (remaining) |  | $ | 345 |
2026 |  |  | 334 |
2027 |  |  | 290 |
2028 |  |  | 301 |
2029 |  |  | 232 |
Total remaining lease payments |  |  | 1,502 |
Less: imputed interest |  |  | (336 | )
Total lease liabilities |  | $ | 1,166 |
Accrued State Sales and Use Tax Matters The Company records state sales tax collected and remitted for its customers on dermatology procedures equipment sales on a net basis, excluded from revenue. The Company’s sales tax expense that is not presently being collected and remitted for the recurring revenue business is recorded in general and administrative expenses within the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company believes its state sales and use tax accruals have been properly recognized such that, if the Company’s arrangements with customers are deemed more likely than not that the Company would not be exempt from sales tax in a particular state, the basis for measurement of the state sales and use tax is calculated in accordance with ASC 405, Liabilities, as a transaction tax. If and when the Company is successful in defending itself or in settling the sales tax obligation for a lesser amount, the reversal of this liability is to be recorded in the period the settlement is reached. However, the precise scope, timing, and time period at issue, as well as the final outcome of any audit and actual settlement, remains uncertain. In the ordinary course of business, the Company is, from time to time, subject to audits performed by state taxing authorities. These actions and proceedings are generally based on the position that the arrangements entered into by the Company are subject to sales and use tax rather than exempt from tax under applicable law. The states of New York and California have assessed the Company an aggregate of $5.2 million including penalties and interest. The audits cover the period from March 2014 through November 2022. The Company received notification that an administrative state judge in New York issued an opinion finding in favor of the Company that the sale of XTRAC treatment codes was not taxable as sales tax with respect to that state’s first assessment. This ruling covers $1.8 million of the total $5.2 million of assessments. The relevant taxing authority filed an appeal of the administrative law judge’s finding and, following the submission of legal briefs by both sides and oral argument held in January 2022, on May 6, 2022, the Company received a written decision from the State of New York Appeals Tribunal (“Tribunal”) overturning the favorable sales tax determination of the administrative law judge. The Company appealed the Tribunal’s decision to the New York State Appellate Division (“Appellate Division”), and posted the required appellate bond in the form of cash collateral. Oral argument was held by the Appellate Division on January 18, 2024. On March 8, 2024, the Company received a decision from the Appellate Division ruling against it in the matter of its sales tax appeal, affirming the Tribunal’s ruling that the Company’s sale of XTRAC treatment codes is subject to sales tax. The Appellate Division concluded that, through the usage arrangements, the Company’s customers had possession of the laser devices and had a license and ability to use the laser devices. The Appellate Division also agreed with the Tribunal that the primary function analysis was not applicable in this matter. On April 11, 2024, the Company filed a motion for leave to appeal the Appellate Division’s decision to the New York State Court of Appeals (“Court of Appeals”). On October 22, 2024, in an unsigned one-line decision, the Court of Appeals denied the Company’s motion to appeal the Appellate Division ruling. Therefore, the adverse decision stands and New York will execute on the appellate bond the Company posted for $1.3 million. As of March 31, 2025, the Company has accrued $1.8 million including penalties and interest as a result of the Appellate Division ruling. The Company is in the administrative process of appeal with respect to the remaining $1.3 million of assessments in the State of New York. The Company believes that the Appellate Division ruling provides an avenue for challenging the pending audit periods and subsequent periods, provided the Company can show that the value of the equipment provided to customers is incidental to the overall value of the non-taxable services that are provided, or should be treated similarly to pharmaceutical treatments, which are generally exempt from sales tax. The State of California has made aggregate assessments of $2.1 million including penalties and interest. The audits cover the period from June 2018 through June 2022. The Company is in the administrative process of appeal in this jurisdiction as well. In those states where the Company did not or may not prevai l with the defenses it has proposed, and in the event there is a determination that the true object of the Company’s recurring revenue model is not exempt from sales taxes and is not a prescription medicine, or the Company does not have other defenses where the Company prevails, the Company may be subject to sales taxes in those particular states for previous years and in the future, plus potential interest and penalties. The precise scope, timing and time periods at issue, as well as the final outcomes of the investigations and judicial proceedings, remain uncertain. Accordingly, the Company’s estimate may change from time to time, and actual losses could vary. Contingent Consideration In connection with the Company’s acquisition of certain assets related to the TheraClear devices in 2022, Theravant Corporation (“Theravant”) is eligible to receive up to $3.0 million in future earnout payments upon the achievement of certain annual net revenue milestones ($1.0 million of which is due upon the earlier of achieving a revenue target or July 2025), up to $20.0 million in future royalty payments based upon a percentage of gross profit from future domestic sales ranging from 10-20%, 25% of gross profit from international sales over the subsequent four-year period, and up to $0.5 million in future milestone payments upon the achievement of certain commercialization related targets. The Company has notified Theravant that it believes the earnout payments are not due and will not be due in the future. Theravant has disputed the Company’s position, and the matter is under discussion among the signatories to the purchase agreement. Through March 31, 2025, the Company has incurred an aggregate of $0.2 million of royalty and gross profit payments based on gross profit from domestic and international sales. Milestone Payments In January 2022, the Company entered into a Development Agreement (the “Development Agreement”) with Theravant. Under the Development Agreement, the Company was to reimburse Theravant for costs incurred in further developing certain TheraClear technology and other healthcare products and methods for the medical aesthetic marketplace. In connection with the development of three devices, Theravant was eligible to receive $0.5 million upon FDA clearance for each device and $0.5 million upon achievement of certain net revenue targets for each device, aggregating to $3.0 million of potential future milestone payments under the Development Agreement. The Development Agreement had a three-year term, unless terminated sooner by either party, and expired in January 2025. The Development Agreement was being accounted for separately from the TheraClear asset acquisition. No milestone payments were incurred under the Development Agreement, and the Company does not anticipate that any such payments may be due in the future. Legal Matters In the ordinary course of business, the Company is routinely a defendant in or party to pending and threatened legal actions and proceedings, including actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants. These actions and proceedings are generally based on alleged violations of employment, contract, and other laws. In some of these actions and proceedings, claims for substantial monetary damages are asserted against the Company. In the ordinary course of business, the Company is also subject to regulatory and governmental examinations, information gathering requests, inquiries, investigations, and threatened legal actions and proceedings. In connection with formal and informal inquiries by federal, state, local and foreign agencies, the Company receives numerous requests, subpoenas and orders for documents, testimony, and information in connection with various aspects of its activities.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/commonPracticeRef -Topic 405 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/405-30/tableOfContent Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -Subparagraph (a) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482648/440-10-50-4 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/commonPracticeRef -Topic 450 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/450/tableOfContent Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 954 -SubTopic 440 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (a) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147478522/954-440-50-1 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -Subparagraph (c) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482648/440-10-50-4 Reference 6: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Topic 440 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/440/tableOfContent + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration