XML 44 R28.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.25.1

Commitments and Contingencies | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2024
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
Commitments and Contingencies | 19. Commitments and Contingencies Facility Leases The Company leases its corporate headquarters under an operating lease that expires in November 2025. The Company has the option to extend the term of the lease for one five (5) year period upon written notice to the landlord. The extension period has not been included in the determination of the ROU asset or the lease liability as the Company concluded that it is not reasonably certain that it would exercise this option. The Company provided the landlord with a security deposit in the amount of $0.1 million, which was recorded as other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company has also entered into a master lease agreement for its vehicles. After an initial non-cancelable twelve-month period, each vehicle is leased on a month-to-month basis. Based on historical retention experience of approximately three years, the vehicles have varying expiration dates through January 2028. The components of lease expense for the year ended December 31, 2024 were as follows (in thousands except lease term and discount rate): Schedule of Components of Lease Expense and Other Information
Operating Lease expense |  | December 31, 2024 |  |  | December 31, 2023 |
Amortization of ROU assets (operating lease cost) |  | $ | 728 |  |  | $ | 560 |
Interest on lease liabilities |  |  | 88 |  |  |  | 84 |
Total lease expense |  | $ | 816 |  |  | $ | 644 |
Other Information |  |  |  |  |  |
Operational cash flow used for operating leases |  | $ | 778 |  |  | $ | 733 |
ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities |  |  | 55 |  |  |  | 800 |
Weighted -average remaining lease term (in years) |  |  | 1.55 |  |  |  | 2.22 |
Weighted -average discount rate |  |  | 8.22 | % |  |  | 7.76 | %
Future lease payments under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2024 were as follows (in thousands): Schedule of Future Commitments and Sublease Income
Years ending December 31, |  | Future lease commitments |
2025 |  |  | 589 |
2026 |  |  | 246 |
2027 |  |  | 44 |
2028 |  |  | 1 |
Thereafter |  |  | - |
Total future minimum lease payments |  | $ | 880 |
Less imputed interest |  | $ | (56 | )
Total lease liability |  | $ | 824 |
Schedule of Operating Lease Liability
Reported as: |  | December 31, 2024 |
Operating lease liability, current |  | $ | 548 |
Operating lease liability, non-current |  |  | 276 |
Total |  |  | 824 |
Second A&R Ameluz LSA Sales Commitment The Second A&R Ameluz LSA will remain in effect for 15 years from its effective date and shall renew automatically for a period of five years, in perpetuity, so long as we have earned revenues from Ameluz product and lamps equal to or greater than $150 million over the preceding five years. If we fail to earn $150 million in revenues from Ameluz® and the RhodoLED® Lamps over the preceding five (5) year period prior to the Second A&R Ameluz LSA’s termination date, Biofrontera Pharma has the right to terminate the Second A&R Ameluz LSA by providing one (1) year written notice. In addition, starting in 2025, under the Second A&R Ameluz LSA, we are to purchase the higher of (i) a minimum quantity of tubes of Ameluz® per year as set forth in the Second A&R Ameluz LSA or (ii) 75% of the annual average of audited Ameluz® tubes sold during the preceding four (4) full calendar years (“Annual Minimum Sales”). If we fail to achieve the respective Annual Minimum Sales for any calendar year, such failure will constitute a termination event, unless waived by the Ameluz Licensor. Ameluz® Minimum Research and Development Costs During the years 2025 through 2030, we will be required to fund minimum R&D costs in an amount that is at least 85% of the difference between (i) the Transfer Price for product, effective February 13, 2024 and (ii) the Transfer Price for product as it would have been determined under the previous version of the license and supply agreement with the Ameluz Licensor, dated October 8, 2021. If we fail to meet the minimum requirement, the difference shall be paid to Biofrontera Pharma on February 15, 2031, in either cash or our Common Stock, at our discretion. Licensing Agreement with Optical Tools On December 2, 2022, the Company entered into the technology transfer agreement with Optical Tools LLC (“Optical Tools”), Stephen Tobin and Paul Sowyrda (the “Agreement”). The Agreement allowed for the transfer of the assigned patents and trademarks, and upon notification by the Company to Optical Tools, the research and development of certain prototypes. The Company paid a licensing fee of $0.2 million which was expensed during the year ended December 31, 2022. On May 28, 2023, the Company authorized Optical Tools to design, develop, manufacture, and deliver at least two portable photodynamic therapy lamp prototypes (“PDT Device”) using the technology in the assigned patents. The PDT Device provides illumination, based on different light profiles, to the external skin surface of the human body. The Company is to reimburse Optical Tools for all reasonable out-of-pocket, material and labor costs per the Agreement. As part of the Agreement, Optical Tools will be eligible to receive regulatory and sales milestone payments totaling up to $1.0 million, and royalties of up to 3% of net revenue of certain products developed under this Agreement. The Company did not make any milestone or royalty payments or accruals for such payments during the years ended December 31, 2024 or 2023. Milestone payments with Ferrer Internacional S.A. Under the Xepi license and supply agreement we are obligated to make payments to Ferrer upon the occurrence of certain milestones. Specifically, we must pay Ferrer (i) $2,000,000 upon the first occasion when annual net sales of Xepi® under the Xepi LSA exceed $25,000,000, and (ii) $4,000,000 upon the first occasion annual net sales of Xepi® under the Xepi LSA exceed $50,000,000. No payments or accruals for such payments were made during the years ended December 31, 2024 or 2023 related to Xepi® milestones. Legal proceedings At each reporting date, the Company evaluates whether or not a potential loss amount or a potential range of loss is probable and reasonably estimable under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 450, Contingencies. The Company expenses as incurred the legal costs related to such legal proceedings. Legal Claims On September 13, 2023, Biofrontera was served with a complaint filed by DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. (“Sun”), and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries LTD in which DUSA alleges i) breach of contract, ii) violation of the Lanham Act, and iii) unfair trade practices under Massachusetts law. All claims stem from allegations that Biofrontera has promoted its Ameluz® product in a manner that is inconsistent with its approved FDA labeling. Though this complaint was originally filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, this matter has been transferred by agreement of the parties to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. In March of 2024, Biofrontera Company filed a partial motion to dismiss the Lanham Act and Massachusetts statutory claims, which was denied on October 15, 2024. Biofrontera subsequently answered Sun’s complaint and filed counterclaims on October 30, 2024 alleging i) violation of the Lanham Act, ii) deceptive trade practices under Georgia law, and iii) trade libel/product disparagement, which Sun answered on December 17, 2024. On March 11, 2025, Biofrontera received an additional notice alleging breach of contract through unlawful marketing practices which makes reference to similar previous communications sent by Sun to Biofrontera on February 4, 2022 and September 9, 2022. Discovery is ongoing in the above-referenced matters. The Company denies the claims brought by Sun and intends to defend them vigorously. Based on the Company’s assessment of the facts underlying the above claims, the uncertainty of litigation and the preliminary stage of the case, the Company cannot estimate the possibility of a material loss, nor the potential range of loss that may result from this action. If the final resolution of the matter is adverse to the Company, it could have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Separately, on June 26, 2024 and June 27, 2024, Sun filed two complaints against Biofrontera, Biofrontera AG, Biofrontera Pharma, and Biofrontera Bioscience with the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts and the International Trade Commission (“ITC”), both alleging infringement of two patents held by Sun (the “Sun Patents”). The complaint filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts has been held in abeyance pending the completion of the case before the ITC. A hearing is scheduled to be held in front of an administrative law judge on June 30, 2025, with an Initial Determination expected by October 1, 2025. The Commission’s Final Determination is expected by February 2, 2026. The Company denies Sun’s patent claims and intends to defend them vigorously in the above-referenced matters. In addition, Biofrontera has challenged the validity of the Sun Patents by filing separate petitions for inter partes review at the United States Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) for each of the Sun Patents. One such petition was instituted by the PTAB on February 24, 2025, and an institution decision on the other petition is anticipated to be received from the PTAB in June, 2025. Based on the Company’s assessment of the facts underlying the above-referenced patent matters, as well as the uncertainty of litigation, the Company cannot estimate the possibility of a material loss, nor the potential range of loss that may result from either action. Money damages are not available to Sun through the case before the ITC, and an adverse ruling could result in an exclusion order being imposed on the allegedly infringing product. If the final resolution of the case before the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts is adverse to the Company, it could have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/commonPracticeRef -Topic 405 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/405-30/tableOfContent Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -Subparagraph (a) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482648/440-10-50-4 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/commonPracticeRef -Topic 450 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/450/tableOfContent Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 954 -SubTopic 440 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (a) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147478522/954-440-50-1 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -Subparagraph (c) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482648/440-10-50-4 Reference 6: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Topic 440 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/440/tableOfContent + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration