XML 38 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.19.1

Note 18 - Injection Wells Suspension | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2018
Notes to Financial Statements |
Suspended Injection Well Costs Disclosure [Text Block] | Note 18. Injection Wells Suspension As a result of a seismic event with a magnitude of 2.1 occurring on August 31, 2014, the Chief of the Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management (“Chief” or “Division”) issued Orders on September 3, 2014 to immediately suspend all operations of Avalon’s two saltwater injection wells until the Division could further evaluate the wells. The Orders were based on the findings that the two saltwater injection wells were located in close proximity to an area of known seismic activity and that the saltwater injection wells pose a risk of increasing or creating seismic activity. On September 5, 2014, Avalon submitted the information required by the Chief’s Order in regards to its AWMS #1 injection well, and the Chief lifted the suspension for that well on September 18, 2014. On September 19, 2014, Avalon submitted information and a written plan required by the Chief’s Order proposing the establishment of certain operations and management controls on injections for the AWMS #2 injection well. To date, the Division has not responded to that plan despite Avalon’s request for feedback. On October 2, 2014, Avalon filed an appeal with the Ohio Oil and Gas Commission (the “Commission”) disputing the basis for suspending operations of AWMS #2 and also the authority of the Chief to immediately suspend such operations. On March 11, 2015, an appeal hearing was held. The Chief stated during the hearing that the suspension order is temporary, and he expects that AWMS #2 will be allowed to resume operations once the state’s final policymaking is complete. On August 12, 2015, the Commission upheld the temporary suspension of injection operations of AWMS #2 stating that the temporary suspension would allow the Chief more time to fully evaluate the facts in anticipation of the Division’s implementation of a comprehensive regulatory plan that will specifically address injection-induced seismicity. Avalon appealed that decision to the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas (the “Court”), and on November 1, 2016 an appeal hearing was held in that Court. On December 23, 2016, the Court issued its Decision and Order in Avalon’s favor, and vacated the Commission’s decision. The Court found that the Division’s suspension and refusal to work with the Company over the 26 month period was arbitrary and not in accordance with reason. Subsequent to the ruling, and in accordance with the Court’s Decision and Order, both Avalon and the Division submitted their proposed restart plans to the Court. Avalon’s plan sets forth both the initial volumes and pressures and increases in volume and pressure while continuously monitoring seismicity and addressing the concerns of public health and safety. On February 21, 2017, the Court issued its Final Decision and Order. The Court’s Final Decision and Order set forth conditions for restarting the AWMS #2 salt water injection well in accordance with the proposed restart plans filed by Avalon with minor revisions. On February 22, 2017, the Division appealed the Final Decision and Order and filed a Motion to Stay the Court Order. The Motion to Stay was granted by the Ohio 10th District Court of Appeals on March 21, 2017. On September 14, 2017, an appeal hearing was held in the Ohio 10 th District Court of Appeals and only July 31, 2018 a decision was issued on the appeal. The decision reinstated the previous Ohio Oil and Gas Commission decision in this matter. On September 12, 2018, the Company appealed the Ohio 10 th District Court of Appeals decision to the Supreme Court of Ohio. On November 21, 2018, Avalon, received notice from the Supreme Court of Ohio that the court would not accept for review the Company’s appeal of the Ohio 10 th District Court of Appeals decision on the Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management’s appeal of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas February 21, 2017 entry allowing restart of the Company’s AWMS Water Solutions, LLC #2 salt water injection well. Based on the Supreme Court of Ohio’s decision not to accept the Company’s appeal for review and the economically unfeasible conditions required by the Division of Oil & Gas Resources Management proposed restart plan, management of Avalon and its Board of Directors concluded that the injection wells would not resume operations in the near future and that the carrying value of the salt water injection wells was not recoverable. In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $3.3 million, the full carrying value of the Company’s salt water injection wells (See Note 2 ). There can be no guarantee that the salt water injection wells will resume operations, but the Company will continue to pursue all available avenues to allow the restart of the Company’s salt water injection well under reasonable conditions. Currently, there is no implemented state-wide policy on induced seismicity and the ODNR has refused to communicate with the Company regarding the status and requirements of any policymaking. The operations of Company’s injection wells will remain suspended until that time. In addition, on August 26, 2016, Avalon filed a complaint in the 11 th Appellate District Court in Trumbull County, Ohio for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus to compel the Director of the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (“ODNR”) to initiate appropriations procedures to determine damages from the illegal regulatory taking of the Company’s property, or issue an alternative remedy at law. The Company believes that the actions, and lack of responsible actions, by the ODNR is a clear violation of the Company’s property rights and a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution; Article I, Section 19 of the Ohio Constitution; and Ohio Revised Code Chapter 163. The hearing was originally scheduled to commence on June 25, 2018 but on June 8, 2018, the 11 th Appellate District Court in Trumbull County, Ohio issued a motion to stay all further proceedings in the writ of mandamus action until a ruling was made on the suspension order by the Ohio 10th District Court of Appeals. On September 17, 2018, the Company filed a motion to lift the stay in the proceeding based on the Ohio 10 th District Court of Appeals ruling. On January 29, 2019, the 11 th Appellate District Court in Trumbull County, Ohio lifted the stay. To date, the hearing date has not been rescheduled. The Company intends to vigorously pursue the complaint and obtain due process and fair compensation.

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for parts or all of the information related to suspended injection wells. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | awx_SuspendedInjectionWellCostsDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | awx_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_DisclosureTextBlockAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration