COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2021
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	NOTE－22 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES As of December 31, 2021, the Company has no material commitments or contingencies. Right issues under Series C-1 preferred stock The Company has issued warrant pursuant to the Series C-1 Subscription Agreement. Each redeemable warrant entitles the holder to purchase two (2) common shares at a price of $168 per share. The warrants shall be exercisable on or before December 31, 2020 and June 30, 2021, respectively. On April 19, 2021, the Company extended the termination date of the Warrant issued to Preferred Series C-1 holder by six months from the expiration date of June 30, 2021 to December 31, 2021. On November 16, 2021, the Company has further extended the termination date until June 30, 2022. The Company considers this warrant as permanent equity per ASC Topic 815-40-35-2, the warrants would not be marked to market at each financial reporting date. However, where there is a subsequent change in assumptions related to warrants (in the instant case, an extension of the expiration date of the warrants), the difference between the amount originally recorded and the newly calculated amount, based upon the changed assumptions, is determined and the difference between the before and after valuation is recorded as an expense, with the corresponding credit to accumulated paid-in capital. Financing arrangement (due to a shareholder) In February 2018, the Company entered into MOU with Connect Investment Pte Ltd (Enter Asia) for capital alliance for approximately 27% of shareholdings in the Company. Further, in August 2018, the said MOU was modified and shareholding was revised from 27% to 10% in the Company. However, subsequently in October 2020, it was agreed between both the parties to cease the said MOU with the understanding that there is no current and future obligation with either of them i.e., neither Enter Asia to make investment in the Company nor the Company to issue shares to Enter Asia. Further, the Enter Asia is going to get the shares of the Hottab Holdings Ltd (HHL) for the amount so far invested in the Company and therefore the amount due to Enter Asia is reclassified into the amount due to shareholder “Hottab Holdings Ltd”. SOSV In January 2019, the HPL entered into stock purchase agreement and accelerator contract for equity (ACE) with SOSV IV LLC (SOSV) whereby the HPL will issue shares representing 5% of their capital stock for the amounts of $168,000 in three tranche (a) SOSV to pay to the HPL $75,000 for integration of Mobile Only Accelerator (MOX) software development kit, (b) SOSV to pay on behalf of the HPL $48,000 upon MOX successful application and setting up subsidiary, and (c) SOSV to pay on behalf of the HPL $45,000 for setting program for services. The Company received first tranche of $75,000 only and thereafter no other two tranche received by the HPL, however, the outcome of the deal did not results success and so later the HPL have not issued any shares to the SOSV, therefore the arrangement amount of $75,000 accounted as loan from SOSV. On February 2, 2021, the Company sent the legal letter to the SOSV intimating that the Company acquired HPL by issuing 117,000 preferred stock series C to Hottab Holding Limited for the 100% acquisition of HPL. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had a total of $75,000 and $75,000, outstanding on this account, respectively. (see below for legal update) Service contracts The Company carries various service contracts on its vendors for repairs, maintenance and inspections. All contracts are short term and can be cancelled. Material contracts On 28 May 2021, the Company entered into a business cooperation agreement with Paytech Company Limited (Strategic Partners) to provide payment integration and loyalty services to the platform that allows merchants to process transactions with consumers. As of date, this program have not started and expected to commence in next year 2022. On 15 August 2021, the Company entered into a business cooperation agreement with Rainbow Loyalty Company Limited (Strategic Partners) to provide loyalty services for merchants on the platform. As of date, this program have not started and expected to commence in next year 2022. On 26 May 2021, the company entered into a business cooperation agreement with TikiNow Smart Logistic Limited Company to provide warehouse service, packing service, delivery service and payment collection of online orders that paid by cash (COD). The agreement have been implemented since Oct 1^st,2021. On 15 May 2021, the company entered into a business cooperation agreement with AisaPay Company Limited (Partner) to provide payment gateway service for customers who make payment by credit cards on the platform. The agreement has been implemented since September 7^th, 2021. On December 6, 2021, the Company entered into two consulting agreements with China-America Culture Media Inc. and New Continental Technology Inc., acting as Consultant to assist the Company in completing certain Business Opportunities with potential partners until February 28, 2023. The consideration of the service are $3,250,000 and $3,190,000. Executive service agreements On April 1, 2017 the Company entered into an at-will employment agreement with Dennis Nguyen, its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Employment Agreement provides for a monthly salary of $40,000; provided that until the Company has adequate reserves to pay Mr. Nguyen’s salary, he may convert any unpaid salary into common stock of the Company at a share price equal to $250 per share. Mr. Nguyen is also entitled to an annual cash bonus of $250,000; provided that until the Company has adequate reserves to pay Mr. Nguyen’s annual bonus, he may convert any unpaid bonus into common stock of the Company as described above. This provision was inserted into the employment agreement to compensate Mr. Nguyen in stock, at his option, and was to remain operable only until the Company has sufficient cash to pay him his salary in cash. From July 2021 until now, the Company’s cash balance has been at least $1 million and the Company has paid Mr. Nguyen his salary in full in every month from July 2021 until now. As a result of these facts, the conversion feature in Mr. Nguyen’s contract became inoperable as of July 1, 2021 and Mr. Nguyen no longer has the option to convert unpaid salary into the Company’s shares. On October 25, 2021, the Company has also amended Mr. Nguyen’s contract to delete the conversion feature to make clear the conversion feature will not be operable in the future. Therefore, the Company will not accrue any expense. Mr. Nguyen is also entitled to participate in all of the other benefits of the Company which are generally available to office employees and other employees of the Company. Mr. Nguyen is not entitled to any severance pay. On September 1, 2021 the Company entered into a 5-year employment agreement with Raynauld Liang, its Chief Financial Officer and Singapore Country General Manager. The employment agreement provides Mr. Liang with compensation of (i) an annual base salary of $240,000; (ii) an annual discretionary incentive cash bonus with a minimum target of 25% of base salary; (iii) 814,950 shares of the Company’s common stock (taking into account the Company’s stock split 1:750 and reverse stock split 1:2.5), of which 651,960 shares are subject to vesting over a two-year period; and (iv) all other executive benefits sponsored by the Company. If a change of control of the Company occurs and if at the time of such change of control the Company’s common stock is trading at a price that is double the initial public offering price, then Mr. Liang will be entitled to a cash bonus equal to three (3) times his base salary. If Mr. Liang is terminated other than for cause or resigns for good reason, he will be entitled to receive continued base salary until the earlier of (x) the anniversary date of such termination and (y) the end of the 5-year term of the employment agreement; provided, however, if the termination is after September 1, 2022, then the period set forth in clause (x) shall be 18 months from the date of the employment agreement. Mr. Liang may terminate the employment agreement at any time other than for good reason with 30 days’ notice to the Company. On November 16, 2021, the Board of Directors awarded Dennis Nguyen a 10-year option to purchase 1,945,270 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $6.49 as the settlement for accrued and unpaid bonuses. Litigation From time to time, the Company may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise, in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm the Company’s business. The Company is not aware of any such legal proceedings that will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or operating results. The litigation docket of Carmel, Milazzo & Feil LLP discloses the following actual, pending or threatened litigation for the Company: Rahul Narain v. Society Pass, Inc. Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Index 656956/2019 Thomas O’Connor & CVO Advisors Pte. Ltd. v. Society Pass, Inc. Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Index 656938/2019 Dennis Nguyen v. Thomas O’Connor Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Index 651015/2020 The Company is currently litigating three cases pending in the Supreme Court for the State of New York, New York County. Two cases are employment actions filed by former employees who seek compensation alleged to be due pursuant to agreements with the Company. Both of the employees are represented by the same counsel and filed their cases in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, in December 2019. In one of those actions, a former employee claims entitlement to compensation and a bonus totaling $566,000 and 39,000-58,500 shares of Company common stock, together with costs. The Company responded to the complaint and also asserted counterclaims in the proceeding for $1,500,000 to $4,000,000 plus punitive damages, together with interest and costs, arising from, inter alia, the former employee’s breach of contract, unfair competition, misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of fiduciary duty. The former employee has responded to the Company’s counterclaims and this action is in the discovery phase of the litigation. In the other employment action, another former employee claims entitlement to salary payments and expense reimbursement in the amount of $122,042.60, plus liquidated damages, together with costs. This former employee also claims entitlement to 516,300 to 760,800 shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, this action also includes claims by a plaintiff-entity alleging entitlement to $8 million in shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred stock. The Company responded to the complaint and also asserted counterclaims against the former employee in the proceeding for $1,500,000 to $2,000,000 plus punitive damages, together with costs, arising from, inter alia, the former employee’s breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference and fraud. The former employee has responded to the Company’s counterclaims and this action is still in the discovery phase of litigation. The third case also involves one of those former employees; therein, a Company affiliate filed suit in February 2020 seeking enforcement, by way of specific performance, of an agreement which entitles the affiliate to purchase all of the 99 percent of the shares of the plaintiff-entity which alleges entitlement to $8 million in shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock in one of the employment actions described above. The former employee has responded to the Company’s complaint in this action with a motion to dismiss, which was later withdrawn by same, and then by way of an answer without counterclaims. The judge assigned to this action has announced his retirement at the end of the calendar year; it is unclear to whom the case will be assigned in the future. The Company was in an AAA arbitration defending allegations of breach of an agreement. The Demand for Arbitration therein, dated August 25, 2020, asserts that the Petitioner, an LLC, had an agreement with the Company and its CEO granting the Petitioner the right to require the Company to redeem certain common stock in the Company for a cash payment. The Demand alleges that the Petitioner submitted a Redemption Notice, as required under the alleged agreement, obligating the Company to redeem the shares. The Demand alleges that the failure of the Company to redeem the shares and pay Petitioner further obligates the Company to provide additional common stock to the Petitioner. The amount alleged to be due to the Petitioner as of July 31, 2020 was said to be $590,461.94 and growing daily while the number of additional common stock shares alleged to be due to Petitioner as of July 31, 2020 was said to be 283,417,033 and growing, daily. The Company has submitted a total and general denial of the allegations of the Demand. The matter has been assigned to an arbitrator and a Preliminary Hearing and Scheduling Order was issued in or around November 9, 2020. Dispositive motions are due at the end of January 2021 but otherwise this matter is in the discovery phase with any Final Hearing before the arbitrator tentatively scheduled for mid-September 2021. On May 21, 2021, the Company has agreed to settle the matter for the sum of $550,000. No additional shares were included in the settlement agreement. The settlement sum is required to be paid in two tranches, with $250,000 to have been paid on or before May 28, 2021 and the remaining $300,000 to be paid on or before June 30, 2021. The Company made the first payment of $250,000 on May 25, 2021 and intends to complete the settlement sum as provided under the settlement agreement by paying the remaining $300,000 on or before June 30, 2021. In connection with the settlement, the Company recognized litigation settlement expense of $550,000 and fully paid during the year ended December 31, 2021. As these matters are in the discovery phase, it is too early to assess the likelihood of success. The Company denies the accusations by both O’Connor and Narain and intends to vigorously defend these matters. SOSV IV LLV v. Society Pass Inc., et al. United States District Court for New Jersey, Index No. 21-cv-12386 On or about March 5, 2021, SOSV IV LLC (“SOSV”) sent a demand letter to the Company in regard to its investment in Hottab Pte. Ltd. (“Hottab”). Thereafter, SOSV filed suit in the District Court for New Jersey on June 10, 2021. In this lawsuit, SOSV alleges that it entered into an investment arrangement with Hottab in which SOSV was to receive five percent (5%) of the common stock of Hottab and entered into an Accelerator Contract for Equity (the “ACE”) pursuant to which it alleges to have invested a sum of $168,000 with Hottab. These events are alleged to have taken place prior to the Company’s acquisition of Hottab. SOSV alleges that the Company subsequently acquired all of the outstanding shares of Hottab, which it alleges triggered a liquidity event clause under the ACE requiring the Company, by way of its ownership of Hottab, to pay SOSV twice its investment, or $336,000. SOSV further alleges that subsequent to a term sheet between the Company and Hottab being executed, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase one hundred percent (100%) of the issued and outstanding shares of Hottab from Hottab Holdings Limited (“Hottab Holdings”). As SOSV does not have any interest in Hottab Holdings, it alleges it did not receive any consideration as allegedly provided under the ACE. Upon these allegations, SOSV asserts causes of action sounding in fraudulent misrepresentation/concealment, breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, quantum meruit and/or unjust enrichment, promissory estoppel, oppression of minority shareholder, and breach of fiduciary duties. SOSV seeks damages in the amount of $336,000.00 in addition damages equal to the value of SOSV’s alleged equity in Hottab or in the alternative shares of the Company in an amount equal to SOSV’s ownership interest in Hottab at the time of the purchase of Hottab’s shares from Hottab Holdings. Initially, SOSV filed suit in the District Court for New Jersey on June 10, 2021. SOSV voluntarily dismissed its New Jersey lawsuit and on October 29, 2021, re-filed the action in the Southern District of New York. The Southern District of New York lawsuit was also voluntarily dismissed by SOSV. SOSV has recently re-filed the suit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. The most recently filed complaint contains largely similar allegations and asserts causes of action sounding in fraudulent misrepresentation/concealment, intentional interference with contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, quantum meruit/unjust enrichment, oppression of minority shareholder, breach of fiduciary duty, and recission (or in the alternative declaration of ownership interest). The most recently filed complaint demands $336,000.00 and damages equal to the value of SOSV’s alleged ownership interest in Hottab, or alternatively an Order compelling the issuance of shares in SoPa in an amount equal to Plaintiff’s ownership interest in Hottab at the time of the Agreement of Purchase and Sale. SOSV also seeks disgorgement, though this does not include any pertinent dollar figure. The Company denies the accusations of SOSV and intends to vigorously defend this matter. As the lawsuit is still in the pleadings stage, we are unable to prognosticate a likelihood of success. The Company reserved a provision for $75,000 legal fee in this lawsuit. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had a total of $53,435 outstanding in legal fees to its attorneys related to these matters. As of December 31, 2021, the Company expects no possible loss from these legal proceedings and no additional provision is accrued accordingly.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2021

NOTE－22 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

As of December 31, 2021, the Company has no material commitments or contingencies.

Right issues under Series C-1 preferred stock

The Company has issued warrant pursuant to the Series C-1 Subscription Agreement. Each redeemable warrant entitles the holder to purchase two (2) common shares at a price of $168 per share. The warrants shall be exercisable on or before December 31, 2020 and June 30, 2021, respectively. On April 19, 2021, the Company extended the termination date of the Warrant issued to Preferred Series C-1 holder by six months from the expiration date of June 30, 2021 to December 31, 2021. On November 16, 2021, the Company has further extended the termination date until June 30, 2022. The Company considers this warrant as permanent equity per ASC Topic 815-40-35-2, the warrants would not be marked to market at each financial reporting date. However, where there is a subsequent change in assumptions related to warrants (in the instant case, an extension of the expiration date of the warrants), the difference between the amount originally recorded and the newly calculated amount, based upon the changed assumptions, is determined and the difference between the before and after valuation is recorded as an expense, with the corresponding credit to accumulated paid-in capital.

Financing arrangement (due to a shareholder)

In February 2018, the Company entered into MOU with Connect Investment Pte Ltd (Enter Asia) for capital alliance for approximately 27% of shareholdings in the Company. Further, in August 2018, the said MOU was modified and shareholding was revised from 27% to 10% in the Company. However, subsequently in October 2020, it was agreed between both the parties to cease the said MOU with the understanding that there is no current and future obligation with either of them i.e., neither Enter Asia to make investment in the Company nor the Company to issue shares to Enter Asia. Further, the Enter Asia is going to get the shares of the Hottab Holdings Ltd (HHL) for the amount so far invested in the Company and therefore the amount due to Enter Asia is reclassified into the amount due to shareholder “Hottab Holdings Ltd”.

SOSV

In January 2019, the HPL entered into stock purchase agreement and accelerator contract for equity (ACE) with SOSV IV LLC (SOSV) whereby the HPL will issue shares representing 5% of their capital stock for the amounts of $168,000 in three tranche (a) SOSV to pay to the HPL $75,000 for integration of Mobile Only Accelerator (MOX) software development kit, (b) SOSV to pay on behalf of the HPL $48,000 upon MOX successful application and setting up subsidiary, and (c) SOSV to pay on behalf of the HPL $45,000 for setting program for services. The Company received first tranche of $75,000 only and thereafter no other two tranche received by the HPL, however, the outcome of the deal did not results success and so later the HPL have not issued any shares to the SOSV, therefore the arrangement amount of $75,000 accounted as loan from SOSV. On February 2, 2021, the Company sent the legal letter to the SOSV intimating that the Company acquired HPL by issuing 117,000 preferred stock series C to Hottab Holding Limited for the 100% acquisition of HPL. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had a total of $75,000 and $75,000, outstanding on this account, respectively. (see below for legal update)

Service contracts

The Company carries various service contracts on its vendors for repairs, maintenance and inspections. All contracts are short term and can be cancelled.

Material contracts

On 28 May 2021, the Company entered into a business cooperation agreement with Paytech Company Limited (Strategic Partners) to provide payment integration and loyalty services to the platform that allows merchants to process transactions with consumers. As of date, this program have not started and expected to commence in next year 2022.

On 15 August 2021, the Company entered into a business cooperation agreement with Rainbow Loyalty Company Limited (Strategic Partners) to provide loyalty services for merchants on the platform. As of date, this program have not started and expected to commence in next year 2022.

On 26 May 2021, the company entered into a business cooperation agreement with TikiNow Smart Logistic Limited Company to provide warehouse service, packing service, delivery service and payment collection of online orders that paid by cash (COD). The agreement have been implemented since Oct 1^st,2021.

On 15 May 2021, the company entered into a business cooperation agreement with AisaPay Company Limited (Partner) to provide payment gateway service for customers who make payment by credit cards on the platform. The agreement has been implemented since September 7^th, 2021.

On December 6, 2021, the Company entered into two consulting agreements with China-America Culture Media Inc. and New Continental Technology Inc., acting as Consultant to assist the Company in completing certain Business Opportunities with potential partners until February 28, 2023. The consideration of the service are $3,250,000 and $3,190,000.

Executive service agreements

On April 1, 2017 the Company entered into an at-will employment agreement with Dennis Nguyen, its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Employment Agreement provides for a monthly salary of $40,000; provided that until the Company has adequate reserves to pay Mr. Nguyen’s salary, he may convert any unpaid salary into common stock of the Company at a share price equal to $250 per share. Mr. Nguyen is also entitled to an annual cash bonus of $250,000; provided that until the Company has adequate reserves to pay Mr. Nguyen’s annual bonus, he may convert any unpaid bonus into common stock of the Company as described above. This provision was inserted into the employment agreement to compensate Mr. Nguyen in stock, at his option, and was to remain operable only until the Company has sufficient cash to pay him his salary in cash. From July 2021 until now, the Company’s cash balance has been at least $1 million and the Company has paid Mr. Nguyen his salary in full in every month from July 2021 until now. As a result of these facts, the conversion feature in Mr. Nguyen’s contract became inoperable as of July 1, 2021 and Mr. Nguyen no longer has the option to convert unpaid salary into the Company’s shares. On October 25, 2021, the Company has also amended Mr. Nguyen’s contract to delete the conversion feature to make clear the conversion feature will not be operable in the future. Therefore, the Company will not accrue any expense. Mr. Nguyen is also entitled to participate in all of the other benefits of the Company which are generally available to office employees and other employees of the Company. Mr. Nguyen is not entitled to any severance pay.

On September 1, 2021 the Company entered into a 5-year employment agreement with Raynauld Liang, its Chief Financial Officer and Singapore Country General Manager. The employment agreement provides Mr. Liang with compensation of (i) an annual base salary of $240,000; (ii) an annual discretionary incentive cash bonus with a minimum target of 25% of base salary; (iii) 814,950 shares of the Company’s common stock (taking into account the Company’s stock split 1:750 and reverse stock split 1:2.5), of which 651,960 shares are subject to vesting over a two-year period; and (iv) all other executive benefits sponsored by the Company. If a change of control of the Company occurs and if at the time of such change of control the Company’s common stock is trading at a price that is double the initial public offering price, then Mr. Liang will be entitled to a cash bonus equal to three (3) times his base salary. If Mr. Liang is terminated other than for cause or resigns for good reason, he will be entitled to receive continued base salary until the earlier of (x) the anniversary date of such termination and (y) the end of the 5-year term of the employment agreement; provided, however, if the termination is after September 1, 2022, then the period set forth in clause (x) shall be 18 months from the date of the employment agreement. Mr. Liang may terminate the employment agreement at any time other than for good reason with 30 days’ notice to the Company.

On November 16, 2021, the Board of Directors awarded Dennis Nguyen a 10-year option to purchase 1,945,270 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $6.49 as the settlement for accrued and unpaid bonuses.

Litigation

From time to time, the Company may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise, in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm the Company’s business. The Company is not aware of any such legal proceedings that will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or operating results.

The litigation docket of Carmel, Milazzo & Feil LLP discloses the following actual, pending or threatened litigation for the Company:

Rahul Narain v. Society Pass, Inc.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Index 656956/2019

Thomas O’Connor & CVO Advisors Pte. Ltd. v. Society Pass, Inc.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Index 656938/2019

Dennis Nguyen v. Thomas O’Connor

Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Index 651015/2020

The Company is currently litigating three cases pending in the Supreme Court for the State of New York, New York County.

Two cases are employment actions filed by former employees who seek compensation alleged to be due pursuant to agreements with the Company. Both of the employees are represented by the same counsel and filed their cases in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, in December 2019.

In one of those actions, a former employee claims entitlement to compensation and a bonus totaling $566,000 and 39,000-58,500 shares of Company common stock, together with costs. The Company responded to the complaint and also asserted counterclaims in the proceeding for $1,500,000 to $4,000,000 plus punitive damages, together with interest and costs, arising from, inter alia, the former employee’s breach of contract, unfair competition, misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of fiduciary duty. The former employee has responded to the Company’s counterclaims and this action is in the discovery phase of the litigation.

In the other employment action, another former employee claims entitlement to salary payments and expense reimbursement in the amount of $122,042.60, plus liquidated damages, together with costs. This former employee also claims entitlement to 516,300 to 760,800 shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, this action also includes claims by a plaintiff-entity alleging entitlement to $8 million in shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred stock. The Company responded to the complaint and also asserted counterclaims against the former employee in the proceeding for $1,500,000 to $2,000,000 plus punitive damages, together with costs, arising from, inter alia, the former employee’s breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference and fraud. The former employee has responded to the Company’s counterclaims and this action is still in the discovery phase of litigation.

The third case also involves one of those former employees; therein, a Company affiliate filed suit in February 2020 seeking enforcement, by way of specific performance, of an agreement which entitles the affiliate to purchase all of the 99 percent of the shares of the plaintiff-entity which alleges entitlement to $8 million in shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock in one of the employment actions described above. The former employee has responded to the Company’s complaint in this action with a motion to dismiss, which was later withdrawn by same, and then by way of an answer without counterclaims. The judge assigned to this action has announced his retirement at the end of the calendar year; it is unclear to whom the case will be assigned in the future.

The Company was in an AAA arbitration defending allegations of breach of an agreement. The Demand for Arbitration therein, dated August 25, 2020, asserts that the Petitioner, an LLC, had an agreement with the Company and its CEO granting the Petitioner the right to require the Company to redeem certain common stock in the Company for a cash payment.

The Demand alleges that the Petitioner submitted a Redemption Notice, as required under the alleged agreement, obligating the Company to redeem the shares. The Demand alleges that the failure of the Company to redeem the shares and pay Petitioner further obligates the Company to provide additional common stock to the Petitioner. The amount alleged to be due to the Petitioner as of July 31, 2020 was said to be $590,461.94 and growing daily while the number of additional common stock shares alleged to be due to Petitioner as of July 31, 2020 was said to be 283,417,033 and growing, daily.

The Company has submitted a total and general denial of the allegations of the Demand. The matter has been assigned to an arbitrator and a Preliminary Hearing and Scheduling Order was issued in or around November 9, 2020. Dispositive motions are due at the end of January 2021 but otherwise this matter is in the discovery phase with any Final Hearing before the arbitrator tentatively scheduled for mid-September 2021. On May 21, 2021, the Company has agreed to settle the matter for the sum of $550,000. No additional shares were included in the settlement agreement. The settlement sum is required to be paid in two tranches, with $250,000 to have been paid on or before May 28, 2021 and the remaining $300,000 to be paid on or before June 30, 2021. The Company made the first payment of $250,000 on May 25, 2021 and intends to complete the settlement sum as provided under the settlement agreement by paying the remaining $300,000 on or before June 30, 2021. In connection with the settlement, the Company recognized litigation settlement expense of $550,000 and fully paid during the year ended December 31, 2021.

As these matters are in the discovery phase, it is too early to assess the likelihood of success. The Company denies the accusations by both O’Connor and Narain and intends to vigorously defend these matters.

SOSV IV LLV v. Society Pass Inc., et al.
United States District Court for New Jersey, Index No. 21-cv-12386

On or about March 5, 2021, SOSV IV LLC (“SOSV”) sent a demand letter to the Company in regard to its investment in Hottab Pte. Ltd. (“Hottab”). Thereafter, SOSV filed suit in the District Court for New Jersey on June 10, 2021.

In this lawsuit, SOSV alleges that it entered into an investment arrangement with Hottab in which SOSV was to receive five percent (5%) of the common stock of Hottab and entered into an Accelerator Contract for Equity (the “ACE”) pursuant to which it alleges to have invested a sum of $168,000 with Hottab. These events are alleged to have taken place prior to the Company’s acquisition of Hottab. SOSV alleges that the Company subsequently acquired all of the outstanding shares of Hottab, which it alleges triggered a liquidity event clause under the ACE requiring the Company, by way of its ownership of Hottab, to pay SOSV twice its investment, or $336,000.

SOSV further alleges that subsequent to a term sheet between the Company and Hottab being executed, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase one hundred percent (100%) of the issued and outstanding shares of Hottab from Hottab Holdings Limited (“Hottab Holdings”). As SOSV does not have any interest in Hottab Holdings, it alleges it did not receive any consideration as allegedly provided under the ACE.

Upon these allegations, SOSV asserts causes of action sounding in fraudulent misrepresentation/concealment, breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, quantum meruit and/or unjust enrichment, promissory estoppel, oppression of minority shareholder, and breach of fiduciary duties. SOSV seeks damages in the amount of $336,000.00 in addition damages equal to the value of SOSV’s alleged equity in Hottab or in the alternative shares of the Company in an amount equal to SOSV’s ownership interest in Hottab at the time of the purchase of Hottab’s shares from Hottab Holdings.

Initially, SOSV filed suit in the District Court for New Jersey on June 10, 2021. SOSV voluntarily dismissed its New Jersey lawsuit and on October 29, 2021, re-filed the action in the Southern District of New York. The Southern District of New York lawsuit was also voluntarily dismissed by SOSV. SOSV has recently re-filed the suit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. The most recently filed complaint contains largely similar allegations and asserts causes of action sounding in fraudulent misrepresentation/concealment, intentional interference with contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, quantum meruit/unjust enrichment, oppression of minority shareholder, breach of fiduciary duty, and recission (or in the alternative declaration of ownership interest). The most recently filed complaint demands $336,000.00 and damages equal to the value of SOSV’s alleged ownership interest in Hottab, or alternatively an Order compelling the issuance of shares in SoPa in an amount equal to Plaintiff’s ownership interest in Hottab at the time of the Agreement of Purchase and Sale. SOSV also seeks disgorgement, though this does not include any pertinent dollar figure.

The Company denies the accusations of SOSV and intends to vigorously defend this matter. As the lawsuit is still in the pleadings stage, we are unable to prognosticate a likelihood of success. The Company reserved a provision for $75,000 legal fee in this lawsuit.

As of December 31, 2021, the Company had a total of $53,435 outstanding in legal fees to its attorneys related to these matters.

As of December 31, 2021, the Company expects no possible loss from these legal proceedings and no additional provision is accrued accordingly.