B.

Functional currency

The functional currency of the Company is the US dollar, which is the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates. In accordance with ASC 830, “Foreign Currency Matters” (ASC 830), balances denominated in or linked to foreign currency are stated on the basis of the exchange rates prevailing at the applicable balance sheet date. For foreign currency transactions included in the statement of operations, the exchange rates applicable on the relevant transaction dates are used. Gains or losses arising from changes in the exchange rates used in the translation of such transactions are carried as financing income or expenses. The functional currency of the Israeli subsidiary is the New Israeli Shekel (“NIS”) and its financial statements are included in consolidation, based on translation into US dollars. Accordingly, assets and liabilities were translated from NIS to US dollars using year-end exchange rates, and expense items were translated at average exchange rates during the year. Gains or losses resulting from translation adjustments are reflected in stockholders’ equity, under “accumulated other comprehensive income”.

SCHEDULE OF OFFICIAL EXCHANGE RATE

	2024			2023
Official exchange rate of NIS 1 to US dollar		0.274			0.272
Increase (Decrease) of the official exchange rate of NIS 1 to US dollar during the year:		0.74	%		(8.86	)%

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash

D.

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash

The Company considers all short-term investments, which are highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase, to be cash equivalents.

Restricted cash is invested in certificates of deposit, which are used to secure Integrity Israel’s obligations in respect of its credit card.

For presentation of statement of cash flows purposes, restricted cash balances are included with cash and cash equivalents, when reconciling the reported period total amounts.

The Company’s cash is held with financial institutions in the United States and Israel. Management believes that the financial institutions that hold the Company’s cash are financially sound and, accordingly, minimal credit risk exists with respect to these investments. Account balances held in the Unites States may, at times, exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance limit. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company had $4,968 and $3,942, respectively, in excess of the FDIC insurance limit.

	2024		2023
	In thousands of US dollars
	December 31,		December 31,
	2024		2023

Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,617	$	4,492
Restricted cash	$	10	$	10
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash shown in the statement of cash flows	$	5,627	$	4,502

Impairment of long-lived assets

F.

Impairment of long-lived assets

The Group’s long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment”, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such asset is considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. To date the Group did not incur any material impairment losses related to long lived assets.

Convertible Promissory Notes

H.

Convertible Promissory Notes

Upon initial recognition of convertible promissory notes and similar instruments, the Company considers the provisions of ASC 815-40, “Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity” (“ASC 815-40”) in order to determine whether the conversion features embedded within the convertible instrument should be separated from the host instrument.

When it is determined that an embedded derivative required to be bifurcated (such as embedded conversion feature that does not qualify for equity classification), the Company recognizes the embedded derivative bifurcated as a separate derivative liability upon initial recognition and on subsequent periods at fair value. The remaining consideration amount received or allocated to the entire convertible instrument is allocated to the host debt instrument. The difference between the face value of the host and the allocated amount represents a discount which is amortized as finance expense to profit or loss using the effective interest method over the term of the note until its stated maturity.

When it is determined that the embedded conversion feature qualifies for equity classification (such when the embedded conversion option, if it were freestanding, is not qualified as a derivative in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815-10, “Derivatives and Hedging” since its terms did not require or permit net settlement or when the embedded conversion option is indexed to the entity’s own stock), the conversion option is not bifurcated. When bifurcation is not required, the Company considers whether the debt instrument involves a significant premium (i.e. when the proceeds received or allocated upon issuance exceed the principal amount that will be paid at maturity). When it is determined that a substantial premium exists, the entire premium is allocated to paid-in capital and when it is determined, otherwise no additional accounting is required and the convertible promissory note is accounted for at amortized cost using the effective interest method over the term of the note until its stated maturity.

Warrants

J.

Warrants

Equity classified warrants

Certain warrants that were determined to be freestanding financial instruments that are legally detachable and separately exercisable, do not embody an obligation for the Company to repurchase its own shares, and permit the holders to receive a fixed number of Ordinary Shares upon exercise for a fixed exercise price and thus, are considered as indexed to the Company’s own shares, were classified as equity instruments. As such warrants were issued together with financial instruments that are not subsequently measured at fair value, the warrants were measured based on allocation of the proceeds received by the Company in accordance with the relative fair value basis. Direct issuance expenses that were allocated to such warrants were deducted from additional paid-in capital.

Warrants classified as derivative liabilities

Upon initial recognition of Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants that were issued in November 2024 as part of an equity issuance and debt conversions, management considered the provisions of ASC 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging — Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity and determined that the settlement amount of Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants might not be based on an exchange of a fixed number of shares for a fixed amount of consideration and thus such Warrants are not eligible to be considered as indexed to the Company’s own shares. Accordingly, the Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants were accounted for as warrant derivative liability at fair value and the changes in fair values are carried to profit or loss. In accordance with ASC 210-10-20, the warrant derivative liability is presented as a noncurrent liability since its settlement will require the issuance of shares and not the use of any resources that are properly classified as current assets.

Income tax

L.

Income tax

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes”. Accordingly, deferred income taxes are determined utilizing the asset and liability method based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial accounting and the tax bases of assets and liabilities under the applicable tax law. Deferred tax balances are computed using the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these differences reverse. Valuation allowances in respect of deferred tax assets are provided for, if necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts more likely than not to be realized.

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC Topic 740-10, which prescribes detailed guidance for the financial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. According to ASC Topic 740-10, tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold. The Company’s accounting policy is to classify interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions under income taxes, however the Company did not recognize such items in its fiscal 2024 and 2023 financial statements and did not recognize any liability with respect to unrecognized tax position in its balance sheet.

Royalty-bearing grants

N.

Royalty-bearing grants

Royalty-bearing grants from the Israeli Innovation Authority (IIA) to fund approved research and development projects are recognized at the time Integrity Israel is entitled to such grants, on the basis of the costs incurred and reduce research and development costs. To date, the cumulative research and development grants received by Integrity Israel from IIA amounted to $93. See also Note 5A below.

Stock-based compensation

P.

Stock-based compensation

The Company measures and recognizes the compensation expense for all equity-based payments to employees based on their estimated fair values in accordance with ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”. Share-based payments including grants of stock options are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss as an operating expense based on the fair value of the award at the date of grant. The fair value of stock options granted is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company has expensed compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures, applying the accelerated vesting method, over the requisite service period or over the implicit service period when a performance condition affects the vesting, and it is considered probable that the performance condition will be achieved. Share-based payments to non-employees are accounted for in accordance with ASC 718.

Segment reporting

R.

Segment reporting

Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or (“CODM”). The Company has identified its Chief Executive Officer, Paul V. Goode, as the CODM who is responsible for making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance. The Company views its operations and manages its business as one operating segment. The Company’s long-lived assets consist primarily of property and equipment, net, which are all held in the United States.

Contingencies

T.

Contingencies

The Company records accruals for loss contingencies arising from claims, litigation and other sources when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. These accruals are adjusted periodically as assessments change or additional information becomes available. Legal costs incurred in connection with loss contingencies are expensed as incurred.

Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

V.

Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures (“ASU 2023-07”). This standard requires a public entity to disclose significant segment expenses and other segment items on an interim and annual basis. Additionally, it requires a public entity to disclose the title and position of the Chief Operating Decision Maker. ASU 2023-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. A public entity should apply the amendments in this ASU retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company adopted ASU 2023-07 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and interim financial statements thereafter, on a retrospective basis for all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The adoption of ASU 2023-07 did not change the way that the Company identifies its reportable segments and, as a result, did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. See (Note 13) - Segment Reporting for further information.