Independent auditors’ repor
t
to the members of Aw
ilco Drilling PLC
fair view,
and for such internal contro
l as the directors determine is necessary
to enable the preparation of
financial statemen
ts that are free from material misstatemen
t, whether due to fraud or
error.
In preparing the
financial statements, the director
s are responsible for assessing the gro
up and parent
company’s ab
ility to continue as a going concern, d
isclosing, as applicable, matters relate
d to going
concern and using
the going concern basis of accounting un
l
ess the directors either
intend to liquidate the
group or the par
ent company or t
o cease operations, or have no
realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor
’
s responsibiliti
es for the audi
t of the fina
ncial statemen
ts
Our objectives are
to o
btain reasonable
assurance about whether
the financial s
tatements as
a
whole are
free
from mater
ial misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error
, and to
issue an auditor
’
s r
e
port that includes o
ur
opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a
guarantee that an audit conducted in
accordance
with
ISAs
(UK)
will
always
detect
a
mater
ial
misstatement
wh
en
it
exists.
Misstatements
can
arise
f
rom
fraud
o
r
error
and are
co
nsidered
material i
f,
individually o
r
in
the
agg
regate,
they
could
reasonably
be
expec
ted
to
in
fluence
the
economic
d
ecisions
of
users
taken
on
the
basis
of
these
fin
ancial
Explanation as to what e
xtent the audit was consid
ered capable of detecting
irregularities, including
fraud
Irregularities, includ
ing fraud, are instances of non
-compliance with laws a
nd regulations. W
e design
procedures in lin
e with our responsibilities, outlined abo
ve, to detect irregularities, includ
ing fraud.
The
risk of not detectin
g a material misstatement
due to fraud is higher
than the risk of not detecting one
resulting from er
ror
, as fraud may in
volve deliberate concealment by
,
for example, forgery or intentional
misrepresentation
s, or through collusion. The extent to which our pr
ocedures are capable o
f detecting
irregularities, inclu
ding fraud is detailed below
.
However
, the primary resp
onsibility for the prevention and detection
of fraud rests with both tho
se
charged with governance of the co
mpany and management.
•
W
e obtained
an understanding of th
e legal and regulatory frameworks th
at are applicable to the
group and deter
mined that the most significant ar
e those that relate to the reportin
g framework
(IFRS and the Com
panies
Act 2006) an
d the relevant tax compliance r
egulations in the
jurisdictions in
which
A
wilco operates. In addition
, we concluded that there are certain significan
t
laws and regu
lations that may have an effect on the determination o
f the amounts and disclosures
in the finan
cial statements and those laws and
regulations relating to h
ealth and safety
,
employee
matters, enviro
nmental, and bribery and corrup
tion practices;
•
W
e under
sto
od how
A
wilco Drilling PLC is comp
lying with those framewo
rks by making
enquiries of
management and those responsible for leg
al and compliance procedures. W
e
corroborated
our enquiries through our review of Board
min
utes, papers p
rovided to the
Audit
Committee and
correspondence received from regulato
ry bodies and noted that there was no
•
W
e assessed the su
sceptibility of the group’
s financial
statements to material misstatement,
including how
fraud might occur by consider
ing the risk of fraud through management o
verride
and, in respon
se, we carried out procedures such
as testing of transactions back
t
o source
information, wh
ich were designed to pro
vide reasonable assurance that th
e financial statements
were free from
fraud or error;
•
Based on
this understanding we designed
our audit procedures to identify non
-c
ompliance with
such laws and r
egulations. Our procedures involved jo
urnal entry
testing, with a focus on journals
meeting our d
efined risk criteria based on our und
erstanding of the business.