XML 36 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.4
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2020
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS  
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

NOTE 8 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

UNL values its investments in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 820 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. The changes to past practice resulting from the application of ASC 820 relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurement. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between: (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of UNL (observable inputs) and (2) UNL’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available under the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The three levels defined by the ASC 820 hierarchy are as follows:

Level I – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level II – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level I that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level II assets include the following: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market-corroborated inputs).

Level III – Unobservable pricing input at the measurement date for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available.

In some instances, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall within different levels of the fair value hierarchy. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest input level that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

The following table summarizes the valuation of UNL’s securities at December 31, 2020 using the fair value hierarchy:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2020

    

Total

    

Level I

    

Level II

    

Level III

Short-Term Investments

 

$

1,000,000

 

$

1,000,000

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

United States Contracts

 

 

(21,964)

 

 

(21,964)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

The following table summarizes the valuation of UNL’s securities at December 31, 2019 using the fair value hierarchy:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2019

    

Total

    

Level I

    

Level II

    

Level III

Short-Term Investments

 

$

3,289,117

 

$

3,289,117

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

United States Contracts

 

 

(435,678)

 

 

(435,678)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

Effective January 1, 2009, UNL adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 815 — Derivatives and Hedging, which require presentation of qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts and gains and losses on derivatives.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives not 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounted for

 

 

 

Fair Value 

 

Fair Value 

as Hedging

 

Statements of Financial 

 

at December 31, 

 

at December 31, 

Instruments

    

Condition Location

    

2020

    

2019

Futures - Commodity Contracts

 

Assets

 

$

(21,964)

 

$

(435,678)

 

 

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statements of Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

For the year ended

    

For the year ended

    

For the year ended

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

December 31, 2019

 

December 31, 2018

 

    

 

    

 

 

    

Change in 

    

 

 

    

Change in 

    

 

 

    

Change in 

Derivatives

 

Location of 

 

Realized 

 

Unrealized 

 

Realized 

 

Unrealized 

 

Realized 

 

Unrealized 

not Accounted

 

Gain (Loss)

 

gain (Loss) 

 

Gain (Loss) on 

 

Gain (Loss) 

 

Gain (Loss) on 

 

Gain (Loss) 

 

Gain (Loss) on 

for as

 

 on Derivatives 

 

on Derivatives 

 

Derivatives 

 

in Derivatives 

 

Derivatives 

 

in Derivatives 

 

Derivatives 

Hedging

 

Recognized in 

 

Recognized in 

 

Recognized in 

 

Recognized in 

 

Recognized in 

 

Recognized in 

 

Recognized in 

Instruments

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

Futures - Commodity Contracts

 

Realized gain (loss) on closed positions

 

$

(608,115)

 

 

 

 

$

(479,014)

 

 

  

 

$

(11,739)

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open positions

 

 

 

 

$

413,714

 

 

 

 

$

(389,575)

 

 

 

 

$

522,819