XML 31 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2019
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS  
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

NOTE 7 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

USL values its investments in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 820 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. The changes to past practice resulting from the application of ASC 820 relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurement. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between: (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of USL (observable inputs) and (2) USL’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available under the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The three levels defined by the ASC 820 hierarchy are as follows:

Level I – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level II – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level I that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level II assets include the following: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market-corroborated inputs).

Level III – Unobservable pricing input at the measurement date for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available.

In some instances, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall within different levels of the fair value hierarchy. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest input level that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

The following table summarizes the valuation of USL’s securities at September 30, 2019 using the fair value hierarchy:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At September 30, 2019

    

Total

    

Level I

    

Level II

    

Level III

Short-Term Investments

 

$

46,822,113

  

$

46,822,113

 

$

 —

  

$

 —

Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

United States Contracts

 

 

(4,878,821)

 

 

(4,878,821)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, there were no transfers between Level I and Level II.

The following table summarizes the valuation of USL’s securities at December 31, 2018 using the fair value hierarchy:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2018

    

Total

    

Level I

    

Level II

    

Level III

Short-Term Investments

 

$

46,760,361

 

$

46,760,361

 

$

 

$

Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States Contracts

 

 

(15,772,193)

 

 

(15,772,193)

 

 

 

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, there were no transfers between Level I and Level II.

Effective January 1, 2009, USL adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 815 – Derivatives and Hedging, which require presentation of qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts and gains and losses on derivatives.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives not

 

Condensed

 

 

 

  

 

 

Accounted for

 

Statements of

 

Fair Value

 

Fair Value

as Hedging

 

Financial

 

At September 30, 

 

At  December 31, 

Instruments

    

Condition Location

    

2019

    

2018

Futures - Commodity Contracts

 

Assets

 

$

(4,878,821)

  

$

(15,772,193)

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Condensed Statements of Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the nine months ended

  

For the nine months ended

 

 

  

 

September 30, 2019

 

September 30, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in

 

 

 

  

Change in

 

 

Location of

 

Realized

 

Unrealized

 

Realized

 

Unrealized

Derivatives not

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Gain (Loss) on

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Gain (Loss) on

Accounted for

 

on Derivatives

 

on Derivatives

 

Derivatives

 

on Derivatives

 

Derivatives

as Hedging

 

Recognized in

 

Recognized in

 

Recognized in

 

Recognized in

 

Recognized in

Instruments

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

Futures - Commodity Contracts

 

Realized gain (loss) on closed positions

 

$

(4,026,962)

 

 

 

  

$

17,430,373

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open positions

 

 

  

  

$

10,893,372

  

 

 

  

$

3,311,927