XML 31 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2020
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS  
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

NOTE 7 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

USL values its investments in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 820 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. The changes to past practice resulting from the application of ASC 820 relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurement. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between: (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of USL (observable inputs) and (2) USL’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best

information available under the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The three levels defined by the ASC 820 hierarchy are as follows:

Level I – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level II – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level I that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level II assets include the following: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market-corroborated inputs).

Level III – Unobservable pricing input at the measurement date for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available.

In some instances, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall within different levels of the fair value hierarchy. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest input level that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

The following table summarizes the valuation of USL’s securities at June 30, 2020 using the fair value hierarchy:

At June 30, 2020

    

Total

    

Level I

    

Level II

    

Level III

Short-Term Investments

$

246,565,462

  

$

246,565,462

$

  

$

Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts

 

 

 

  

 

  

United States Contracts

 

66,376,630

 

66,376,630

 

 

The following table summarizes the valuation of USL’s securities at December 31, 2019 using the fair value hierarchy:

At December 31, 2019

    

Total

    

Level I

    

Level II

    

Level III

Short-Term Investments

$

50,852,898

$

50,852,898

$

$

Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts

United States Contracts

3,602,591

3,602,591

Effective January 1, 2009, USL adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 815 – Derivatives and Hedging, which require presentation of qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts and gains and losses on derivatives.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

Condensed

  

Statements of

Fair Value

Fair Value

Financial

at June 30, 

at  December 31, 

Derivatives not Accounted for as Hedging Instruments

    

Condition Location

    

2020

    

2019

Futures - Commodity Contracts

 

Assets

$

66,376,630

  

$

3,602,591

 

  

 

  

 

  

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Condensed Statements of Operations

For the six months ended

  

For the six months ended

  

June 30, 2020

June 30, 2019

Change in

  

Change in

Location of

Realized

Unrealized

Realized

Unrealized

Gain (Loss)

gain (Loss)

Gain (Loss) on

Gain (Loss)

Gain (Loss) on

on Derivatives

on Derivatives

Derivatives

in Derivatives

Derivatives

Recognized in

Recognized in

Recognized in

Recognized in

Recognized in

Derivatives not Accounted for as Hedging Instruments

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

Futures - Commodity Contracts

 

Realized gain (loss) on closed positions

$

10,650,520

  

$

(1,925,589)

 

  

 

  

 

  

  

  

 

  

 

  

 

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open positions

 

  

  

$

62,774,039

  

  

$

13,130,099