XML 42 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

NOTE 7 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

USBO values its investments in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 820 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”).  ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement.  The changes to past practice resulting from the application of ASC 820 relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurement.  ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between: (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of USBO (observable inputs) and (2) USBO’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available under the circumstances (unobservable inputs).  The three levels defined by the ASC 820 hierarchy are as follows:

 

Level I – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

 

Level II – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level I that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.  Level II assets include the following: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market-corroborated inputs).

 Level III – Unobservable pricing input at the measurement date for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available.

 

In some instances, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall within different levels of the fair value hierarchy. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest input level that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

 

The following table summarizes the valuation of USBO’s securities at June 30, 2012 using the fair value hierarchy:

 

At June 30, 2012   Total     Level I     Level II     Level III  
Short-Term Investments   $ 39,349,534     $ 39,349,534     $ —     $ —  
Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts                                
Foreign Contracts     (568,660 )     (568,660 )     —       —  

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, there were no transfers between Level I and Level II.  

 

The following table summarizes the valuation of USBO’s securities at December 31, 2011 using the fair value hierarchy: 

  

At December 31, 2011   Total     Level I     Level II     Level III  
Short-Term Investments   $ 19,346,002     $ 19,346,002     $ —     $ —  
Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts                                
Foreign Contracts     (916,570 )     (916,570 )     —       —  

 

During the year ended December 31, 2011, there were no transfers between Level I and Level II.

 

USBO has adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 815 – Derivatives and Hedging, which require presentation of qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts and gains and losses on derivatives.

 

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

 

Derivatives not
Accounted for as
Hedging
Instruments		   Condensed Statements
of Financial Condition
Location		     Fair Value
At June 30, 2012		     Fair Value
At December 31, 2011		  
Futures -
Commodity Contracts		     Assets     $ (568,660 )   $ (916,570 )

 

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Condensed Statements of Operations

 

     For the six months ended
June 30, 2012		      For the six months ended
June 30, 2011		  
Derivatives not
Accounted for as
Hedging
Instruments		   Location of Gain
or (Loss)
on Derivatives
Recognized in
Income		   Realized
Gain or (Loss) on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income		     Change in
Unrealized
Gain or (Loss)
on Derivatives
Recognized in
Income		     Realized
Gain or (Loss) on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income		     Change in
Unrealized
Gain or (Loss)
on Derivatives
Recognized in
Income		  
Futures –
Commodity Contracts		   Realized gain (loss)
on closed
positions		   $ (3,492,540 )         $ 5,967,540        
  Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open
positions		         $ 347,910           $ (936,770 )