XML 27 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.2
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jul. 13, 2019
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, reflecting the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing.

Financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term maturities of these financial instruments. See Note 6 for discussion of the fair value measurements related to long-lived asset impairment charges. At July 13, 2019 the book value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt instruments, excluding debt financing costs, were as follows:

 

July 13,

 

(In thousands)

2019

 

Book value of debt instruments, excluding debt financing costs:

 

 

 

 

Current maturities of long-term debt and finance lease liabilities

$

 

17,709

 

Long-term debt and finance lease liabilities

 

 

690,734

 

Total book value of debt instruments

 

 

708,443

 

Fair value of debt instruments, excluding debt financing costs

 

 

714,044

 

Excess of fair value over book value

$

 

5,601

 

 

The estimated fair value of debt is based on market quotes for instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities (Level 2 inputs and valuation techniques).

Certain of the Company’s business combinations involve the potential for the receipt or payment of future contingent consideration upon the shortfall or achievement of various operating thresholds, respectively. The additional consideration is generally contingent on the acquired company reaching certain performance milestones, including attaining specified EBITDA levels. For business combinations including contingent consideration provisions an asset or liability is recorded for the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration on the acquisition date. The fair value of the contingent consideration is remeasured at each reporting period with the change in fair value recognized as income or expense within operating expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company measures the asset and liability on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs. As of July 13, 2019, the probability of payment related to existing contingent consideration provisions was remote.

The fair value of contingent consideration associated with the Caito Foods Service, Inc. and Blue Ribbon Transport, LLC acquisition was zero as of July 13, 2019. During the period ended July 13, 2019, the Company received $15.0 million related to the resolution of certain acquisition contingencies. As of July 13, 2019, the potential for future payment of contingent consideration is remote and there is no opportunity for additional receipt of contingent consideration, therefore no assets or liabilities are recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Upon receipt of the proceeds, the portion of the contingent consideration related to the acquisition date fair value was reported as a financing activity in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. Amounts received in excess of the acquisition date fair value were reported as an operating activity in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.