XML 37 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.4
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Jan. 02, 2021
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, reflecting the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing.

Financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term maturities of these financial instruments. For discussion of the fair value measurements related to goodwill, and long-lived asset impairment charges, refer to Note 5 and Note 6. At January 2, 2021 and December 28, 2019, the book value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt instruments, excluding debt financing costs, were as follows:

 

 

January 2,

 

 

December 28,

 

(In thousands)

2021

 

 

2019

 

Book value of debt instruments, excluding debt financing costs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current maturities of long-term debt and finance lease liabilities

$

 

5,135

 

 

$

 

6,349

 

Long-term debt and finance lease liabilities

 

 

485,381

 

 

 

 

687,659

 

Total book value of debt instruments

 

 

490,516

 

 

 

 

694,008

 

Fair value of debt instruments, excluding debt financing costs

 

 

497,941

 

 

 

 

700,631

 

Excess of fair value over book value

$

 

7,425

 

 

$

 

6,623

 

 

The estimated fair value of debt is based on market quotes for instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities (Level 2 inputs and valuation techniques).

Certain of the Company’s business combinations involved the potential for the receipt or payment of future contingent consideration upon the shortfall or achievement of various operating thresholds, respectively. The additional consideration was generally contingent on the acquired company reaching certain performance milestones, including attaining specified EBITDA levels. An asset or liability is recorded for the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration at the acquisition date and is re-measured each reporting period, using Level 3 inputs, with changes in fair value recognized as income or expense within operating expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings. 

During 2019, the Company received $15.0 million related to the resolution of certain acquisition contingencies associated with the Caito and BRT acquisition executed at the beginning of fiscal 2017. Upon receipt of the proceeds, the portion of the contingent consideration related to the acquisition date fair value was reported as a financing activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Amounts received in excess of the acquisition date fair value were reported as an operating activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows.