10-Q 1 d392606d10q.htm FORM 10-Q

##### Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2012

OR

¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 001-31817

CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland |  | 42-1241468
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
44 South Bayles Avenue, Port Washington, New York |  | 11050-3765
(Address of principal executive offices) |  | (Zip Code)

(516) 767-6492

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer |  | ¨ |  | Accelerated filer |  | x
Non-accelerated filer |  | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |  | Smaller reporting company |  | ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: At July 31, 2012, there were 71,791,845 shares of Common Stock, $0.06 par value, outstanding.

##### Table of Contents

CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.

INDEX

Forward-Looking Statements |  |  | 3 |
Part I. Financial Information |  |  |  |
Item 1. Financial Statements |  |  |  |
Consolidated Balance Sheets—June 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011 |  |  | 4 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)—Three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 |  |  | 5 |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited)—Three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 |  |  | 6 |
Consolidated Statement of Equity (unaudited)—Six months ended June 30, 2012 |  |  | 7 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)—Six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 |  |  | 8 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)—June 30, 2012 |  |  | 9-24 |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations |  |  | 25-34 |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |  |  | 35 |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |  |  | 36 |
Part II. Other Information |  |  |  |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |  |  | 37 |
Item 6. Exhibits |  |  | 37 |
Signatures |  |  | 38 |

2

##### Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

The information contained in this Form 10-Q is unaudited and does not purport to disclose all items required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In addition, statements made or incorporated by reference herein may include certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward- looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe the Company’s future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may”, “will”, “should”, “estimates”, “projects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “expects”, “intends”, “future”, and words of similar import, or the negative thereof. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Company are as set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

3

##### Table of Contents

CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

|  | June 30, |  |  | December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
|  | (unaudited) |  |  |  |
Assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Real estate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Land |  | $ | 268,934,000 |  |  | $ | 268,982,000 |
Buildings and improvements |  |  | 1,109,130,000 |  |  |  | 1,099,456,000 |
|  |  | 1,378,064,000 |  |  |  | 1,368,438,000 |
Less accumulated depreciation |  |  | (221,443,000 | ) |  |  | (197,578,000 | )
Real estate, net |  |  | 1,156,621,000 |  |  |  | 1,170,860,000 |
Real estate held for sale/conveyance |  |  | 191,538,000 |  |  |  | 207,553,000 |
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture |  |  | 43,173,000 |  |  |  | 44,743,000 |
Cash and cash equivalents |  |  | 7,594,000 |  |  |  | 12,070,000 |
Restricted cash |  |  | 15,657,000 |  |  |  | 14,707,000 |
Receivables: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Rents and other tenant receivables, net |  |  | 5,650,000 |  |  |  | 6,882,000 |
Straight-line rents |  |  | 13,993,000 |  |  |  | 13,435,000 |
Other |  |  | 4,914,000 |  |  |  | 5,810,000 |
Other assets |  |  | 5,132,000 |  |  |  | 12,358,000 |
Deferred charges, net |  |  | 21,058,000 |  |  |  | 21,446,000 |
Assets relating to real estate held for sale/conveyance |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,299,000 |
Total assets |  | $ | 1,465,330,000 |  |  | $ | 1,512,163,000 |
Liabilities and equity |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Mortgage loans payable |  | $ | 562,248,000 |  |  | $ | 588,516,000 |
Mortgage loans payable—real estate held for sale/conveyance |  |  | 113,384,000 |  |  |  | 123,115,000 |
Secured credit facilities |  |  | 179,500,000 |  |  |  | 166,317,000 |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  |  | 25,989,000 |  |  |  | 32,404,000 |
Unamortized intangible lease liabilities |  |  | 32,318,000 |  |  |  | 35,017,000 |
Liabilities relating to real estate held for sale/conveyance |  |  | 6,339,000 |  |  |  | 6,406,000 |
Total liabilities |  |  | 919,778,000 |  |  |  | 951,775,000 |
Noncontrolling interest—limited partners’ mezzanine OP Units |  |  | 658,000 |  |  |  | 4,616,000 |
Commitments and contingencies |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Equity: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. shareholders’ equity: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Preferred stock ($.01 par value, 12,500,000 shares authorized): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series A ($25.00 per share liquidation value, 6,400,000 shares authorized, 6,020,000 and 6,400,000 shares,respectively, issued and outstanding) |  |  | 149,150,000 |  |  |  | 158,575,000 |
Series B ($25.00 per share liquidation value, 5,400,000 shares authorized, 453,000 and 0 shares, respectively,issued and outstanding) |  |  | 10,414,000 |  |  |  | — |
Common stock ($.06 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 71,823,000 and 67,928,000 shares, respectively, issued and outstanding) |  |  | 4,310,000 |  |  |  | 4,076,000 |
Treasury stock (3,704,000 and 1,313,000 shares, respectively, at cost) |  |  | (21,280,000 | ) |  |  | (10,528,000 | )
Additional paid-in capital |  |  | 738,602,000 |  |  |  | 718,974,000 |
Cumulative distributions in excess of net income |  |  | (389,064,000 | ) |  |  | (373,741,000 | )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |  |  | (3,146,000 | ) |  |  | (3,513,000 | )
Total Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. shareholders’ equity |  |  | 488,986,000 |  |  |  | 493,843,000 |
Noncontrolling interests: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Minority interests in consolidated joint ventures |  |  | 54,653,000 |  |  |  | 56,511,000 |
Limited partners’ OP Units |  |  | 1,255,000 |  |  |  | 5,418,000 |
Total noncontrolling interests |  |  | 55,908,000 |  |  |  | 61,929,000 |
Total equity |  |  | 544,894,000 |  |  |  | 555,772,000 |
Total liabilities and equity |  | $ | 1,465,330,000 |  |  | $ | 1,512,163,000 |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

##### Table of Contents

CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(unaudited)

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Rents |  | $ | 26,988,000 |  |  | $ | 25,914,000 |  |  | $ | 53,683,000 |  |  | $ | 51,587,000 |
Expense recoveries |  |  | 6,360,000 |  |  |  | 5,894,000 |  |  |  | 13,323,000 |  |  |  | 14,047,000 |
Other |  |  | 3,642,000 |  |  |  | 770,000 |  |  |  | 4,461,000 |  |  |  | 1,454,000 |
Total revenues |  |  | 36,990,000 |  |  |  | 32,578,000 |  |  |  | 71,467,000 |  |  |  | 67,088,000 |
Expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Operating, maintenance and management |  |  | 5,510,000 |  |  |  | 5,858,000 |  |  |  | 11,886,000 |  |  |  | 14,284,000 |
Real estate and other property-related taxes |  |  | 4,262,000 |  |  |  | 4,043,000 |  |  |  | 8,655,000 |  |  |  | 8,198,000 |
General and administrative |  |  | 3,737,000 |  |  |  | 2,691,000 |  |  |  | 7,362,000 |  |  |  | 5,205,000 |
Management transition charges |  |  | — |  |  |  | 6,350,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 6,530,000 |
Acquisition transaction costs and terminated projects |  |  | — |  |  |  | 73,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,242,000 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 9,796,000 |  |  |  | 9,311,000 |  |  |  | 25,522,000 |  |  |  | 18,030,000 |
Total expenses |  |  | 23,305,000 |  |  |  | 28,326,000 |  |  |  | 53,425,000 |  |  |  | 53,489,000 |
Operating income |  |  | 13,685,000 |  |  |  | 4,252,000 |  |  |  | 18,042,000 |  |  |  | 13,599,000 |
Non-operating income and expense: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs |  |  | (9,744,000 | ) |  |  | (10,177,000 | ) |  |  | (19,923,000 | ) |  |  | (20,667,000 | )
Accelerated write-off of deferred financing costs |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (2,607,000 | ) |  |  | — |
Interest income |  |  | 62,000 |  |  |  | 129,000 |  |  |  | 124,000 |  |  |  | 177,000 |
Unconsolidated joint ventures: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Equity in income |  |  | 576,000 |  |  |  | 34,000 |  |  |  | 1,021,000 |  |  |  | 825,000 |
Write-off of investment |  |  | — |  |  |  | (7,961,000 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (7,961,000 | )
Gain on sales |  |  | 79,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 79,000 |  |  |  | 28,000 |
Total non-operating income and expense |  |  | (9,027,000 | ) |  |  | (17,975,000 | ) |  |  | (21,306,000 | ) |  |  | (27,598,000 | )
Income (loss) from continuing operations |  |  | 4,658,000 |  |  |  | (13,723,000 | ) |  |  | (3,264,000 | ) |  |  | (13,999,000 | )
Discontinued operations: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income from operations |  |  | 944,000 |  |  |  | 778,000 |  |  |  | 2,403,000 |  |  |  | 2,247,000 |
Impairment (charges)/reversals |  |  | — |  |  |  | (12,258,000 | ) |  |  | 1,138,000 |  |  |  | (22,544,000 | )
Gain on sales |  |  | 293,000 |  |  |  | 474,000 |  |  |  | 750,000 |  |  |  | 474,000 |
Total discontinued operations |  |  | 1,237,000 |  |  |  | (11,006,000 | ) |  |  | 4,291,000 |  |  |  | (19,823,000 | )
Net income (loss) |  |  | 5,895,000 |  |  |  | (24,729,000 | ) |  |  | 1,027,000 |  |  |  | (33,822,000 | )
Less, net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Minority interests in consolidated joint ventures |  |  | (662,000 | ) |  |  | 22,000 |  |  |  | (1,708,000 | ) |  |  | 47,000 |
Limited partners’ interest in Operating Partnership |  |  | (8,000 | ) |  |  | 579,000 |  |  |  | 97,000 |  |  |  | 839,000 |
Total net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |  |  | (670,000 | ) |  |  | 601,000 |  |  |  | (1,611,000 | ) |  |  | 886,000 |
Net income (loss) attributable to Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. |  |  | 5,225,000 |  |  |  | (24,128,000 | ) |  |  | (584,000 | ) |  |  | (32,936,000 | )
Preferred stock dividends |  |  | (3,607,000 | ) |  |  | (3,540,000 | ) |  |  | (7,138,000 | ) |  |  | (7,041,000 | )
Preferred stock redemption costs |  |  | (382,000 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (382,000 | ) |  |  | — |
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |  | $ | 1,236,000 |  |  | $ | (27,668,000 | ) |  | $ | (8,104,000 | ) |  | $ | (39,977,000 | )
Per common share attributable to common shareholders (basic and diluted): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Continuing operations |  | $ | 0.01 |  |  | $ | (0.25 | ) |  | $ | (0.16 | ) |  | $ | (0.30 | )
Discontinued operations |  |  | 0.00 |  |  |  | (0.16 | ) |  |  | 0.03 |  |  |  | (0.29 | )
|  | $ | 0.01 |  |  | $ | (0.41 | ) |  | $ | (0.13 | ) |  | $ | (0.59 | )
Amounts attributable to Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. common shareholders, net of noncontrolling interests: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income (loss) from continuing operations |  | $ | 793,000 |  |  | $ | (16,873,000 | ) |  | $ | (10,483,000 | ) |  | $ | (20,510,000 | )
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |  |  | 443,000 |  |  |  | (10,795,000 | ) |  |  | 2,379,000 |  |  |  | (19,467,000 | )
Net income (loss) |  | $ | 1,236,000 |  |  | $ | (27,668,000 | ) |  | $ | (8,104,000 | ) |  | $ | (39,977,000 | )
Weighted average number of common shares—basic and diluted |  |  | 68,038,000 |  |  |  | 68,099,000 |  |  |  | 67,787,000 |  |  |  | 67,664,000 |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

##### Table of Contents

CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(unaudited)

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | 5,895,000 |  |  | $ | (24,729,000 | ) |  | $ | 1,027,000 |  |  | $ | (33,822,000 | )
Other comprehensive income: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of cash flow hedges: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Consolidated |  |  | 21,000 |  |  |  | 115,000 |  |  |  | 309,000 |  |  |  | 413,000 |
Unconsolidated |  |  | 4,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 58,000 |  |  |  | — |
Other comprehensive income |  |  | 25,000 |  |  |  | 115,000 |  |  |  | 367,000 |  |  |  | 413,000 |
Comprehensive income (loss) |  |  | 5,920,000 |  |  |  | (24,614,000 | ) |  |  | 1,394,000 |  |  |  | (33,409,000 | )
Comprehensive (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |  |  | (669,000 | ) |  |  | 601,000 |  |  |  | (1,611,000 | ) |  |  | 882,000 |
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. |  | $ | 5,251,000 |  |  | $ | (24,013,000 | ) |  | $ | (217,000 | ) |  | $ | (32,527,000 | )

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

##### Table of Contents

CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.

Consolidated Statement of Equity

Six months ended June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

|  | Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. Shareholders |
|  | Preferred stock |  |  | Common stock |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cumulative |  |  | Accumulated |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  | $25.00 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Treasury |  |  | Additional |  |  | distributions |  |  | other |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  | Liquidation |  |  |  |  |  | $0.06 |  |  | stock, |  |  | paid-in |  |  | in excess of |  |  | comprehensive |  |  |  |
|  | Shares |  |  | value |  |  | Shares |  |  | Par value |  |  | at cost |  |  | capital |  |  | net income |  |  | (loss) |  |  | Total |
Balance, December 31, 2011 |  |  | 6,400,000 |  |  | $ | 158,575,000 |  |  |  | 67,928,000 |  |  | $ | 4,076,000 |  |  | $ | (10,528,000 | ) |  | $ | 718,974,000 |  |  | $ | (373,741,000 | ) |  | $ | (3,513,000 | ) |  | $ | 493,843,000 |
Net income (loss) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (584,000 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (584,000 | )
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of cash flow hedges |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 309,000 |  |  |  | 309,000 |
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of cash flow hedge—unconsolidated joint venture |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 58,000 |  |  |  | 58,000 |
Share-based compensation, net |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,760,000 |  |  |  | 166,000 |  |  |  | (10,752,000 | ) |  |  | 12,279,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,693,000 |
Net proceeds from sales of Series B shares |  |  | 453,000 |  |  |  | 10,414,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (650,000 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 9,764,000 |
Redemptions/repurchases of Series A shares |  |  | (380,000 | ) |  |  | (9,425,000 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 285,000 |  |  |  | (382,000 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (9,522,000 | )
Common stock sales and issuance expenses, net |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (170,000 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (170,000 | )
Preferred stock dividends |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (7,138,000 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (7,138,000 | )
Distributions to common shareholders/noncontrolling interests |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (7,219,000 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (7,219,000 | )
Conversions of OP Units into common stock |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,134,000 |  |  |  | 68,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 7,827,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 7,895,000 |
Reallocation adjustment of limited partners’ interest |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 57,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 57,000 |
Balance, June 30, 2012 |  |  | 6,473,000 |  |  | $ | 159,564,000 |  |  |  | 71,823,000 |  |  | $ | 4,310,000 |  |  | $ | (21,280,000 | ) |  | $ | 738,602,000 |  |  | $ | (389,064,000 | ) |  | $ | (3,146,000 | ) |  | $ | 488,986,000 |

|  | Noncontrolling Interests |
|  |  |  |  | Limited |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Minority |  |  | partners’ |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | interests in |  |  | interest in |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | consolidated |  |  | Operating |  |  |  |  |  | Total |
|  | joint ventures |  |  | Partnership |  |  | Total |  |  | equity |
Balance, December 31, 2011 |  | $ | 56,511,000 |  |  | $ | 5,418,000 |  |  | $ | 61,929,000 |  |  | $ | 555,772,000 |
Net income (loss) |  |  | 1,708,000 |  |  |  | (82,000 | ) |  |  | 1,626,000 |  |  |  | 1,042,000 |
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of cash flow hedges |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 309,000 |
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of cash flow hedge—unconsolidated joint venture |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 58,000 |
Share-based compensation, net |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,693,000 |
Net proceeds from sales of Series B shares |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 9,764,000 |
Redemptions/repurchases of Series A shares |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (9,522,000 | )
Common stock sales and issuance expenses, net |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (170,000 | )
Preferred stock dividends |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (7,138,000 | )
Distributions to common shareholders/noncontrolling interests |  |  | (3,566,000 | ) |  |  | (56,000 | ) |  |  | (3,622,000 | ) |  |  | (10,841,000 | )
Conversions of OP Units into common stock |  |  | — |  |  |  | (3,998,000 | ) |  |  | (3,998,000 | ) |  |  | 3,897,000 |
Reallocation adjustment of limited partners’ interest |  |  | — |  |  |  | (27,000 | ) |  |  | (27,000 | ) |  |  | 30,000 |
Balance, June 30, 2012 |  | $ | 54,653,000 |  |  | $ | 1,255,000 |  |  | $ | 55,908,000 |  |  | $ | 544,894,000 |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

7

##### Table of Contents

CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

|  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Cash flow from operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | 1,027,000 |  |  | $ | (33,822,000 | )
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | (1,021,000 | ) |  |  | (825,000 | )
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 1,021,000 |  |  |  | 557,000 |
Write-off of investment in unconsolidated joint venture |  |  | — |  |  |  | 7,961,000 |
Acquisition transaction costs and terminated projects |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,242,000 |
Impairment (reversals)/charges—discontinued operations |  |  | (1,138,000 | ) |  |  | 22,544,000 |
Gain on sales |  |  | (829,000 | ) |  |  | (502,000 | )
Straight-line rents |  |  | (566,000 | ) |  |  | (998,000 | )
Provision for doubtful accounts |  |  | 1,469,000 |  |  |  | 1,765,000 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 25,543,000 |  |  |  | 21,466,000 |
Amortization of intangible lease liabilities |  |  | (2,990,000 | ) |  |  | (2,995,000 | )
Expense and market price adjustments relating to share-based compensation |  |  | 1,746,000 |  |  |  | 3,128,000 |
Amortization (including accelerated write-off) of deferred financing costs |  |  | 3,786,000 |  |  |  | 2,143,000 |
Increases/decreases in operating assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Rents and other receivables, net |  |  | (163,000 | ) |  |  | (4,405,000 | )
Prepaid expenses and other |  |  | 5,459,000 |  |  |  | (257,000 | )
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  |  | (5,253,000 | ) |  |  | (3,436,000 | )
Net cash provided by operating activities |  |  | 28,091,000 |  |  |  | 13,566,000 |
Cash flow from investing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Expenditures for real estate and improvements |  |  | (11,640,000 | ) |  |  | (63,158,000 | )
Net proceeds from sales of real estate |  |  | 16,761,000 |  |  |  | 11,577,000 |
Net proceeds from transfers to unconsolidated Cedar/RioCan joint venture |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,894,000 |
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | — |  |  |  | (4,183,000 | )
Distributions of capital from unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 1,628,000 |  |  |  | 2,996,000 |
Construction escrows and other |  |  | 1,446,000 |  |  |  | (6,554,000 | )
Net cash provided by (used in) in investing activities |  |  | 8,195,000 |  |  |  | (56,428,000 | )
Cash flow from financing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net advances from revolving credit facilities |  |  | 13,183,000 |  |  |  | 34,500,000 |
Proceeds from mortgage financings |  |  | — |  |  |  | 29,291,000 |
Mortgage repayments |  |  | (31,851,000 | ) |  |  | (4,762,000 | )
Payments of debt financing costs |  |  | (4,268,000 | ) |  |  | — |
Noncontrolling interests: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Contributions from consolidated joint venture minority interests |  |  | — |  |  |  | 269,000 |
Distributions to consolidated joint venture minority interests |  |  | (3,566,000 | ) |  |  | (1,973,000 | )
Distributions to limited partners |  |  | (71,000 | ) |  |  | (255,000 | )
Proceeds from sales of preferred stock, net |  |  | 9,764,000 |  |  |  | — |
Redemptions/repurchases of preferred stock, net |  |  | (9,425,000 | ) |  |  | — |
Proceeds from sales of common stock, net |  |  | (170,000 | ) |  |  | 4,299,000 |
Preferred stock dividends |  |  | (7,279,000 | ) |  |  | (7,099,000 | )
Distributions to common shareholders |  |  | (7,079,000 | ) |  |  | (12,148,000 | )
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |  |  | (40,762,000 | ) |  |  | 42,122,000 |
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |  |  | (4,476,000 | ) |  |  | (740,000 | )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |  |  | 12,070,000 |  |  |  | 14,166,000 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |  | $ | 7,594,000 |  |  | $ | 13,426,000 |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

8

##### Table of Contents

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

Note 1. Business and Organization

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that focuses primarily on ownership and operation of supermarket-anchored shopping centers straddling the Washington, DC to Boston corridor. At June 30, 2012, the Company owned and managed a portfolio of 67 operating properties (excluding properties “held for sale/conveyance”). In addition, the Company has an ownership interest in 22 operating properties through its Cedar/RioCan joint venture in which the Company has a 20% interest.

During 2011, the Company determined (1) to completely exit the Ohio market, principally the Discount Drug Mart portfolio of drugstore/convenience centers, and concentrate on the mid-Atlantic and Northeast coastal regions, (2) to concentrate on grocery-anchored strip centers, by disposing of its mall and single-tenant/triple-net-lease properties, and (3) to focus on improving operations and performance at the Company’s remaining properties, and to reduce development activities, by disposing of certain development projects, land acquired for development, and other non-core assets. In addition, discontinued operations reflect the anticipated consummation of the Homburg joint venture buy/sell transactions.

Cedar Realty Trust Partnership, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”) is the entity through which the Company conducts substantially all of its business and owns (either directly or through subsidiaries) substantially all of its assets. At June 30, 2012, the Company owned a 99.6% economic interest in, and was the sole general partner of, the Operating Partnership. The limited partners’ interest in the Operating Partnership (0.4% at June 30, 2012) is represented by Operating Partnership Units (“OP Units”). The carrying amount of such interest is adjusted at the end of each reporting period to an amount equal to the limited partners’ ownership percentage of the Operating Partnership’s net equity. The approximately 281,000 OP Units outstanding at June 30, 2012 are economically equivalent to the Company’s common stock. The holders of OP Units have the right to exchange their OP Units for the same number of shares of the Company’s common stock or, at the Company’s option, for cash.

As used herein, the “Company” refers to Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, including the Operating Partnership or, where the context so requires, Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. only.

9

##### Table of Contents

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Changes

Principles of Consolidation/Basis of Preparation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for interim reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statement disclosures. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for fair presentation (including normal recurring accruals) have been included. The financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis in accordance with GAAP, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods covered by the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The financial statements reflect certain reclassifications of prior period amounts to conform to the 2012 presentation, principally to reflect the sale and/or treatment as “held for sale/conveyance” of certain operating properties and the treatment thereof as “discontinued operations”. The reclassifications had no impact on previously-reported net income attributable to common shareholders or earnings per share. The consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of the Company, the Operating Partnership, its subsidiaries, and certain joint venture partnerships in which it participates. The Company consolidates all variable interest entities (“VIEs”) for which it is the primary beneficiary. Generally, a VIE is an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk (i) lack the power to make decisions about the entity’s activities that significantly impact the entity’s performance through voting or similar rights, (ii) have no obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) have no right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, or (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. A VIE is required to be consolidated by its primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE has (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. Significant judgments related to these determinations include estimates about the current and future fair values and performance of real estate held by these VIEs and general market conditions.

The Company has a 20% interest in a joint venture with RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust of Toronto, Canada, a publicly-traded Canadian real estate investment trust (“RioCan”). At June 30, 2012, the joint venture owned 22 properties. Although the Company provides management and other services, RioCan has significant management participation rights. The Company has determined that this joint venture is not a VIE and, accordingly, the Company accounts for its investment in this joint venture under the equity method.

10

##### Table of Contents

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

Supplemental Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Information

|  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Supplemental disclosure of cash activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash paid for interest |  | $ | 22,902,000 |  |  | $ | 24,160,000 |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Conversion of OP Units into common stock |  |  | 7,895,000 |  |  |  | — |
Mortgage loans payable assumed by buyers |  |  | 4,148,000 |  |  |  | — |
Capitalization of interest and deferred financing costs |  |  | 745,000 |  |  |  | 1,141,000 |

Recently-Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in US GAAP and IFRS”. This update defines fair value, clarifies a framework to measure fair value, and requires specific disclosures of fair value measurements. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted the FASB ASU 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income”, which requires the components of other comprehensive income to be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The guidance has been applied retrospectively and, other than presentation in the financial statements, its adoption did not have an effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Note 3. Real Estate

At June 30, 2012, substantially all of the Company’s real estate was pledged as collateral for mortgage loans payable and credit facilities.

11

##### Table of Contents

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

Note 4—Discontinued operations and land dispositions

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company determined to sell Kingston Plaza, located in Kingston, New York. As the property met the “held for sale” criteria as of March 31, 2012, it has been treated as a “discontinued operation” for all periods presented. The Company conducts a continuing review of the values for all remaining properties “held for sale/conveyance” and, based on final sales prices and sales contracts entered into, the Company has recorded an approximate $1.1 million reversal of impairment charges for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

As of June 30, 2012, the Company is in the process of conveying four of its properties (Roosevelt II, Gahanna Discount Drug Mart Plaza, Westlake Discount Drug Mart Plaza and McCormick Place) to their respective lenders (mortgage loans payable and accrued interest aggregated $22.9 million at that date). In connection with these conveyances, each applicable subsidiary borrower has stopped paying monthly mortgage payments and is currently in default on these non-recourse mortgages.

The following is a summary of the components of income (loss) from discontinued operations:

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Rents |  | $ | 4,428,000 |  |  | $ | 6,551,000 |  |  | $ | 9,504,000 |  |  | $ | 14,326,000 |
Expense recoveries |  |  | 1,098,000 |  |  |  | 1,422,000 |  |  |  | 2,498,000 |  |  |  | 3,487,000 |
Other |  |  | 19,000 |  |  |  | 29,000 |  |  |  | 58,000 |  |  |  | 363,000 |
Total revenues |  |  | 5,545,000 |  |  |  | 8,002,000 |  |  |  | 12,060,000 |  |  |  | 18,176,000 |
Expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Operating, maintenance and management |  |  | 1,891,000 |  |  |  | 1,958,000 |  |  |  | 3,784,000 |  |  |  | 5,151,000 |
Real estate and other property-related taxes |  |  | 819,000 |  |  |  | 1,352,000 |  |  |  | 2,005,000 |  |  |  | 2,758,000 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,768,000 |  |  |  | 21,000 |  |  |  | 3,604,000 |
Interest expense |  |  | 1,891,000 |  |  |  | 2,146,000 |  |  |  | 3,847,000 |  |  |  | 4,416,000 |
|  |  | 4,601,000 |  |  |  | 7,224,000 |  |  |  | 9,657,000 |  |  |  | 15,929,000 |
Income from discontinued operations before impairments |  |  | 944,000 |  |  |  | 778,000 |  |  |  | 2,403,000 |  |  |  | 2,247,000 |
Impairment (charges)/reversals |  |  | — |  |  |  | (12,258,000 | ) |  |  | 1,138,000 |  |  |  | (22,544,000 | )
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |  | $ | 944,000 |  |  | $ | (11,480,000 | ) |  | $ | 3,541,000 |  |  | $ | (20,297,000 | )
Gain on sales of discontinued operations |  | $ | 293,000 |  |  | $ | 474,000 |  |  | $ | 750,000 |  |  | $ | 474,000 |

12

##### Table of Contents

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company completed the following transactions related to properties “held for sale/conveyance”:

|  | Percent |  |  |  |  | Date |  |  | Sales |  |  | Gain on |
Property |  | Owned |  |  | Location |  | Sold |  |  | Price |  |  | Sale |
Hilliard Discount Drug Mart Plaza |  |  | 100 | % |  | Hilliard, OH |  |  | 2/7/2012 |  |  | $ | 1,434,000 |  |  | $ | — |
First Merit Bank at Akron |  |  | 100 | % |  | Akron, OH |  |  | 2/23/2012 |  |  |  | 633,000 |  |  |  | — |
Grove City Discount Drug Mart Plaza |  |  | 100 | % |  | Grove City, OH |  |  | 3/12/2012 |  |  |  | 1,925,000 |  |  |  | — |
CVS at Naugatuck |  |  | 50 | % |  | Naugatuck, CT |  |  | 3/20/2012 |  |  |  | 3,350,000 |  |  |  | 457,000 |
CVS at Bradford |  |  | 100 | % |  | Bradford, PA |  |  | 3/30/2012 |  |  |  | 967,000 |  |  |  | — |
CVS at Celina |  |  | 100 | % |  | Celina, OH |  |  | 3/30/2012 |  |  |  | 1,449,000 |  |  |  | — |
CVS at Erie |  |  | 100 | % |  | Erie, PA |  |  | 3/30/2012 |  |  |  | 1,278,000 |  |  |  | — |
CVS at Portage Trail |  |  | 100 | % |  | Akron, OH |  |  | 3/30/2012 |  |  |  | 1,061,000 |  |  |  | — |
Rite Aid at Massillon |  |  | 100 | % |  | Massillon, OH |  |  | 3/30/2012 |  |  |  | 1,492,000 |  |  |  | — |
Kingston Plaza |  |  | 100 | % |  | Kingston, NY |  |  | 4/12/2012 |  |  |  | 1,182,000 |  |  |  | 293,000 |
Stadium Plaza |  |  | 100 | % |  | East Lansing, MI |  |  | 5/3/2012 |  |  |  | 5,400,000 |  |  |  | — |
Blue Mountain Commons (land parcel) |  |  | 100 | % |  | Harrisburg. PA |  |  | 6/19/2012 |  |  |  | 102,000 |  |  |  | 79,000 |
Oregon Pike (land parcel) |  |  | 100 | % |  | Lancaster, PA |  |  | 6/28/2012 |  |  |  | 1,100,000 |  |  |  | — |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 21,373,000 |  |  | $ | 829,000 |

Note 5. Investment in Cedar/RioCan Joint Venture

At June 30, 2012, the Cedar/RioCan joint venture (RioCan – 80%; Cedar – 20%) owned 22 properties. The Company earned management fees from the joint venture of approximately $0.6 million and $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $1.3 million and $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Such fees are included in other revenues in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

13

##### Table of Contents

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

The following summarizes certain financial information related to the Company’s investment in the Cedar/RioCan unconsolidated joint venture:

|  | June 30, |  |  | December 31, |
Balance Sheets |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Real estate, net |  | $ | 523,159,000 |  |  | $ | 532,071,000 |
Cash and cash equivalents |  |  | 11,581,000 |  |  |  | 12,797,000 |
Restricted cash |  |  | 3,195,000 |  |  |  | 3,689,000 |
Rent and other receivables |  |  | 1,650,000 |  |  |  | 2,419,000 |
Straight-line rents |  |  | 3,523,000 |  |  |  | 2,743,000 |
Deferred charges, net |  |  | 11,856,000 |  |  |  | 12,682,000 |
Other assets |  |  | 4,144,000 |  |  |  | 5,549,000 |
Total assets |  | $ | 559,108,000 |  |  | $ | 571,950,000 |
Liabilities and partners’ capital: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Mortgage loans payable |  | $ | 314,895,000 |  |  | $ | 317,293,000 |
Due to the Company |  |  | 527,000 |  |  |  | 1,203,000 |
Unamortized intangible lease liabilities |  |  | 20,451,000 |  |  |  | 22,182,000 |
Other liabilities |  |  | 7,282,000 |  |  |  | 8,248,000 |
Total liabilities |  |  | 343,155,000 |  |  |  | 348,926,000 |
Preferred stock |  |  | 97,000 |  |  |  | 97,000 |
Partners’ capital |  |  | 215,856,000 |  |  |  | 222,927,000 |
Total liabilities and partners’ capital |  | $ | 559,108,000 |  |  | $ | 571,950,000 |
The Company’s share of partners’ capital |  | $ | 43,173,000 |  |  | $ | 44,743,000 |

14

##### Table of Contents

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  |  | Six months ended June 30, |
Statements of Income |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Revenues |  | $ | 16,012,000 |  |  | $ | 15,296,000 |  |  | $ | 31,944,000 |  |  | $ | 31,289,000 |
Property operating and other expenses |  |  | (1,403,000 | ) |  |  | (1,307,000 | ) |  |  | (2,968,000 | ) |  |  | (3,966,000 | )
Management fees |  |  | (463,000 | ) |  |  | (483,000 | ) |  |  | (1,052,000 | ) |  |  | (950,000 | )
Real estate taxes |  |  | (1,937,000 | ) |  |  | (1,819,000 | ) |  |  | (3,862,000 | ) |  |  | (3,551,000 | )
Acquisition transaction costs |  |  | — |  |  |  | (790,000 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (858,000 | )
General and administrative |  |  | (67,000 | ) |  |  | (61,000 | ) |  |  | (135,000 | ) |  |  | (132,000 | )
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | (5,056,000 | ) |  |  | (5,177,000 | ) |  |  | (10,170,000 | ) |  |  | (10,140,000 | )
Interest and other non-operating expenses, net |  |  | (4,219,000 | ) |  |  | (4,684,000 | ) |  |  | (8,654,000 | ) |  |  | (9,079,000 | )
Net income |  | $ | 2,867,000 |  |  | $ | 975,000 |  |  | $ | 5,103,000 |  |  | $ | 2,613,000 |
The Company’s share of net income |  | $ | 576,000 |  |  | $ | 195,000 |  |  | $ | 1,021,000 |  |  | $ | 523,000 |

Note 6. Fair Value Measurements

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, rents and other receivables, certain other assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value. The fair value of the Company’s investments and liabilities related to deferred compensation plans were determined to be a Level 1 within the valuation hierarchy, and were based on independent values provided by financial institutions. The valuation of the liability for the Company’s interest rate swaps, which is measured on a recurring basis, was determined to be a Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy, and was based on independent values provided by financial institutions. The valuation of the assets for the Company’s real estate held for sale/conveyance – discontinued operations, which is measured on a nonrecurring basis, have been determined to be (i) a Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy, based on the respective contracts of sale, adjusted for closing costs and expenses, or (ii) a Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy, where applicable, based on estimated sales prices, adjusted for closing costs and expenses, determined by discounted cash flow analyses, direct capitalization analyses or a sales comparison approach if no contracts had been concluded. The discounted cash flow analyses and direct capitalization analyses include all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specific holding period and where applicable, any estimated debt premiums. These cash flows were comprised of unobservable inputs which included forecasted rental revenues and expenses based upon existing in-place leases, market conditions and expectations for growth. Capitalization rates and discount rates utilized in these analyses were based upon observable rates that the Company believed to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective properties. The sales comparison approach was utilized for certain land values and include comparable sales that were completed in the selected market areas. The comparable sales utilized in these analyses were based upon observable per acre rates that the Company believed to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective properties.

15

##### Table of Contents

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

Generally, the Company engages third party valuation experts to assist with the preparation of the valuation methods noted above. These valuations are reviewed and approved by a diverse group of management, as deemed necessary, including personnel from acquisitions, accounting, finance, operations, development and leasing. During every reporting period, management reviews and updates the valuations as appropriate.

The following tables show the hierarchy for those assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively:

|  | Assets/Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a |
|  | Recurring Basis |
|  | June 30, 2012 |
Description |  | Level 1 |  |  | Level 2 |  |  | Level 3 |  |  | Total |
Investments related to deferred compensation liabilities (a) |  | $ | 416,000 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 416,000 |
Deferred compensation liabilities (b) |  | $ | 415,000 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 415,000 |
Interest rate swaps liability (b) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1,925,000 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1,925,000 |
|  | December 31, 2011 |
Description |  | Level 1 |  |  | Level 2 |  |  | Level 3 |  |  | Total |
Investments related to deferred compensation liabilities (a) |  | $ | 3,562,000 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 3,562,000 |
Deferred compensation liabilities (b) |  | $ | 3,562,000 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 3,562,000 |
Interest rate swaps liability (b) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 2,053,000 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 2,053,000 |

(a) | Included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

(b) | Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

16

##### Table of Contents

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

The fair value of the Company’s fixed rate mortgage loans was estimated using available market information and discounted cash flows analyses based on borrowing rates the Company believes it could obtain with similar terms and maturities. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the aggregate fair values of the Company’s fixed rate mortgage loans payable, which were determined to be a Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy, were approximately $521.1 million and $528.5 million, respectively; the carrying values of such loans were $498.9 million and $524.7 million, respectively.

The following tables show the hierarchy for those assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively:

|  | Assets Measured at Fair Value on a |
|  | Non-Recurring Basis |
|  | June 30, 2012 |
|  | Level 1 |  |  | Level 2 |  |  | Level 3 |  |  | Total |
Asset Description |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Real estate held for sale/conveyance |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 113,162,000 |  |  | $ | 78,376,000 |  |  | $ | 191,538,000 |
|  | December 31, 2011 |
|  | Level 1 |  |  | Level 2 |  |  | Level 3 |  |  | Total |
Asset Description |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Real estate held for sale/conveyance |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 124,154,000 |  |  | $ | 82,520,000 |  |  | $ | 206,674,000 | (a)

(a) | Excludes $0.9 million relating to a property subsequently treated as “held for sale/conveyance”.

17

##### Table of Contents

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

The following table details the quantitative information regarding Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2012:

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
|  | Fair value at |  |  | Valuation |  | Unobservable |  | Range
|  | June 30, 2012 |  |  | Technique |  | inputs |  | (weighted average)
Real estate held for sale/conveyance: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Operating retail real estate (ten properties) |  | $ | 70,226,000 |  |  | Discounted cash flow |  | Capitalization rates |  | 7.5% to 11.3% (9.7%)
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Discount rates |  | 11.0% to 12.0% (11.4%)
Land (six parcels) |  |  | 8,150,000 |  |  | Sales comparison approach |  | Price per acre |  | $29,000 to $187,000 per acre
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | ($92,000 per acre)
|  | $ | 78,376,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |

Note 7. Debt

Amended, Restated and Consolidated Credit Facility

On January 26, 2012, the Company entered into a $300 million secured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”), which amended, restated and consolidated its $185 million stabilized property revolving credit facility and its $150 million development property credit facility. The two prior facilities were due to expire on January 31, 2012 and June 13, 2012, respectively.

The Credit Facility is comprised of a four-year $75 million term loan and a three-year $225 million revolving credit facility, subject to collateral in place. In connection with the Credit Facility, the Company paid participating lender fees and closing and transaction costs of approximately $4.0 million. In addition, the Company wrote off $2.6 million of unamortized fees associated with the terminated stabilized property and development credit facilities.

Borrowings under the Credit Facility are priced at LIBOR plus a spread of 200 to 300 bps based on the Company’s leverage ratio (the weighted-average rate of interest as of June 30, 2012 was 3.0% per annum). Subject to customary conditions, the term loan and the revolving credit facility may both be extended for one additional year at the Company’s option. Under an accordion feature, the Credit Facility can be increased to $500 million, subject to customary conditions, collateral in place and lending commitments from participating banks.

18

##### Table of Contents

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

The Credit Facility contains financial covenants including, but not limited to, maximum debt leverage, minimum interest coverage, minimum fixed charge coverage, and minimum net worth. In addition, the Credit Facility contains restrictions including, but not limited to, limits on indebtedness, certain investments and distributions. The Company’s failure to comply with these covenants or the occurrence of an event of default under the Credit Facility could result in the acceleration of the Company’s debt and other financial obligations under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility is available to fund acquisitions, redevelopment and remaining development activities, capital expenditures, mortgage repayments, dividend distributions, working capital and other general corporate purposes.

As of June 30, 2012, the Company has $104.5 million outstanding under the revolving credit portion of the Credit Facility, and had $78.3 million available for additional borrowings as of the date.

Derivative financial instruments

At June 30, 2012, the Company had approximately $31.8 million of mortgage loans payable subject to interest rate swaps. Such interest rate swaps converted LIBOR-based variable rates to fixed annual rates of 5.2% to 6.5% per annum. At that date, the Company had accrued liabilities of $1.9 million (included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet) relating to the fair value of interest rate swaps applicable to existing mortgage loans payable. Charges and/or credits relating to the changes in fair values of such interest rate swaps are made to accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, noncontrolling interests (minority interests in consolidated joint ventures and limited partners’ interest), or operations (included in interest expense), as appropriate.

The following is a summary of the derivative financial instruments held by the Company and the Cedar/RioCan joint venture at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

|  |  |  |  |  |  | Notional values |  |  |  |  | Balance |  | Fair value |
Designation/ |  |  |  |  |  |  | June 30, |  |  |  |  |  | December 31, |  |  | Maturity |  | sheet |  | June 30, |  |  | December 31, |
Cash flow |  | Derivative |  | Count |  |  | 2012 |  |  | Count |  |  | 2011 |  |  | dates |  | location |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
|  | Interest rate swaps |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accrued liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Qualifying |  | Consolidated |  |  | 3 |  |  | $ | 31,761,000 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  | $ | 32,091,000 |  |  | 2013-2018 |  | Consolidated |  | $ | 1,925,000 |  |  | $ | 2,053,000 |
|  | Cedar/RioCan |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cedar/RioCan |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Qualifying |  | Joint Venture |  |  | 1 |  |  | $ | 13,991,000 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  | $ | 14,182,000 |  |  | 2016 |  | Joint Venture |  | $ | 2,334,000 |  |  | $ | 2,419,000 |

19

##### Table of Contents

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

The following presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of operations and the consolidated statements of equity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively:

|  |  |  | Amount of gain recognized in other |
|  |  |  | comprehensive income (loss) (effective portion) |
Designation/ |  |  |  | Three months ended June 30, |  |  | Six months ended June 30, |
Cash flow |  | Derivative |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Qualifying |  | Consolidated |  | $ | 21,000 |  |  | $ | 113,000 |  |  | $ | 309,000 |  |  | $ | 411,000 |
|  | Cedar/RioCan |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Qualifying |  | Joint Venture |  | $ | 4,000 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 58,000 |  |  | $ | — |

As of June 30, 2012, the Company believes it has no significant risk associated with non-performance of the financial institutions which are the counterparties to its derivative contracts. Additionally, based on the rates in effect as of June 30, 2012, if a counterparty were to default, the Company would receive a net interest benefit.

Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is a party to certain legal actions arising in the normal course of business. Management does not expect there to be adverse consequences from these actions that would be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company has entered into joint venture arrangements with respect to a number of its properties. The applicable joint venture agreements generally include buy/sell provisions pursuant to which, after a specified period of years, either party may initiate the buy/sell provision whereby the initiating party can designate a value for the relevant property or properties, and the other party may then elect either to sell its proportionate ownership interest in the joint venture based on that value for the entire property or to purchase the initiating party’s ownership interest based on such valuation for the entire property or properties. Specifically, the joint venture agreement between the Company and RioCan provides that, at any time after December 10, 2012, either the Company or RioCan may initiate the buy/sell provision.

20

##### Table of Contents

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

Note 9. Shareholders’ Equity

On May 15, 2012, the Company concluded a public offering of 400,000 shares of its 7.25% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock “Series B Preferred Stock” at $23.00 per share, and realized net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $8.6 million. The Series B Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, has no stated maturity, is not convertible into any other security of the Company, and is redeemable at the Company’s option beginning May 22, 2017 at a price of $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid distributions. In addition, on May 29, 2012 the Company entered into an at-the-market (“ATM”) equity program in which the Company may, from time to time, offer and sell up to an additional 4,000,000 shares of its 7.25% Series B Preferred Stock. During the period ended June 30, 2012, the Company sold approximately 53,000 shares under the ATM equity program at a weighted average price of $23.15 per share, and realized net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $1.2 million. In addition, during the period ended June 30, 2012, the Company redeemed and/or purchased on the open-market approximately 380,000 shares of its 8.875% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, for a total cash outlay of $9.6 million (including $89,000 of accrued dividends).

The following table provides a summary of dividends declared and paid per share:

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Common stock |  | $ | 0.050 |  |  | $ | 0.090 |  |  | $ | 0.100 |  |  | $ | 0.180 |
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
8.875% Series A |  | $ | 0.555 |  |  | $ | 0.555 |  |  | $ | 1.109 |  |  | $ | 1.109 |
7.250% Series B |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, holders of approximately 1,134,000 OP Units (including 564,000 mezzanine OP Units) converted their holdings to shares of the Company’s common stock. In connection therewith, $3.9 million of the carrying value of mezzanine OP Units was reclassified to equity.

21

##### Table of Contents

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

Note 10. Revenues

Rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, are comprised of the following:

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Base rents |  | $ | 24,835,000 |  |  | $ | 24,060,000 |  |  | $ | 49,667,000 |  |  | $ | 48,022,000 |
Percentage rent |  |  | 174,000 |  |  |  | 220,000 |  |  |  | 464,000 |  |  |  | 384,000 |
Straight-line rents |  |  | 247,000 |  |  |  | 365,000 |  |  |  | 562,000 |  |  |  | 746,000 |
Amortization of intangible lease liabilities |  |  | 1,732,000 |  |  |  | 1,269,000 |  |  |  | 2,990,000 |  |  |  | 2,435,000 |
Total rents |  | $ | 26,988,000 |  |  | $ | 25,914,000 |  |  | $ | 53,683,000 |  |  | $ | 51,587,000 |

Other revenues include items such as lease termination fees which tend to fluctuate more than rents from period to period. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded lease termination income of approximately $3.0 million.

Note 11. Share-Based Compensation

The following tables set forth certain share-based compensation information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively:

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Share-based compensation: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Expense relating to share grants (including the equity and liability awards) |  | $ | 845,000 |  |  | $ | 2,816,000 |  |  | $ | 1,736,000 |  |  | $ | 3,796,000 |
Adjustments to reflect changes in market price of Company’s common stock |  |  | (20,000 | ) |  |  | (518,000 | ) |  |  | 10,000 |  |  |  | (668,000 | )
Total charged to operations (a) |  | $ | 825,000 |  |  | $ | 2,298,000 |  |  | $ | 1,746,000 |  |  | $ | 3,128,000 |

(a) | The 2011 amounts include $1,980,000 applicable to accelerated vestings included in management transition charges.

On June 15, 2012, the Company’s shareholders approved the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”), which was designed to replace the existing 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”). In connection with the approval of the 2012 Plan, the Company agreed not to grant any additional new awards under the 2004 Plan. The 2012 Plan establishes the procedures for the granting of, among other things, restricted stock awards an d, in addition to mirroring the basic provisions of the 2004 Plan, specifically provides for the awarding of the remaining two million shares to the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, as provided in his employment agreement. As a result of the approval, 500,000 of such shares, which had previously been recorded as a liability award, were reclassified to equity. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2012, there were 557,000 other time-based restricted shares issued with a weighted average grant date fair value of $4.60 per share. The 2012 Plan also increases the maximum number of shares that may be granted to a participant in any calendar year to 500,000 and initially had 4.5 million shares available. At June 30, 2012, 2.5 million shares remained available for grants pursuant to the 2012 Plan.

22

##### Table of Contents

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

Note 12. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to the Company’s common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period including participating securities (restricted shares issued pursuant to the Company’s share-based compensation program are considered participating securities, as such shares have non-forfeitable rights to receive dividends). Unvested restricted shares are not allocated net losses and/or any excess of dividends declared over net income, as such amounts are allocated entirely to the common shareholders. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company had 3.1 million and 3.1 million, respectively, of weighted average unvested restricted shares outstanding. EPS for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are calculated based on the data presented on the face of the consolidated statement of operations for those periods. The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the EPS calculations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012:

|  | Three months ended |  |  | Six months ended |
|  | June 30, 2012 |  |  | June 30, 2012 |
Numerator |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income (loss) from continuing operations |  | $ | 4,658,000 |  |  | $ | (3,264,000 | )
Preferred stock dividends |  |  | (3,607,000 | ) |  |  | (7,138,000 | )
Preferred stock redemption costs |  |  | (382,000 | ) |  |  | (382,000 | )
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |  |  | 124,000 |  |  |  | 301,000 |
Net earnings allocated to unvested shares |  |  | (295,000 | ) |  |  | (448,000 | )
Income (loss) from continuing operations available for common shareholders |  |  | 498,000 |  |  |  | (10,931,000 | )
Results from discontinued operations, net of noncontrolling interests |  |  | 443,000 |  |  |  | 2,379,000 |
Net income (loss) available for common shareholders, basic and diluted |  | $ | 941,000 |  |  | $ | (8,552,000 | )
Denominator |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Weighted average number of vested common shares outstanding |  |  | 68,038,000 |  |  |  | 67,787,000 |
Earnings (loss) per common share, basic and diluted |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Continuing operations |  | $ | 0.01 |  |  | $ | (0.16 | )
Discontinued operations |  | $ | 0.00 |  |  | $ | 0.03 |
|  | $ | 0.01 |  |  | $ | (0.13 | )

23

##### Table of Contents

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

Fully-diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into shares of common stock. The net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests of the Operating Partnership has been excluded from the numerator and the related OP Units have been excluded from the denominator for the purpose of calculating diluted EPS as there would have been no effect had such amounts been included. The weighted average number of OP Units outstanding was 462,000 and 1,415,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively and 637,000 and 1,415,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In addition, warrants for the purchase of OP Units (83,000 for all periods) have been excluded as they were anti-dilutive for all periods; such warrants expired on May 31, 2012.

Note 13. Subsequent Events

In determining subsequent events, management reviewed all activity from July 1, 2012 through the date of filing this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

On July 30, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.05 per share with respect to its common stock as well as an equal distribution per unit on its outstanding OP Units. At the same time, the Board declared dividends of $0.5546875 per share with respect to the Company’s 8.875% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and $0.453125 per share with respect to the Company’s 7.25% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. The distributions are payable on August 20, 2012 to shareholders of record on August 10, 2012.

24

##### Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

Executive Summary

The Company is a fully-integrated real estate investment trust which currently focuses primarily on ownership and operation of supermarket-anchored shopping centers straddling the Washington, DC to Boston corridor. At June 30, 2012, the Company owned and managed a portfolio of 67 operating properties (excluding properties “held for sale/conveyance”) totaling approximately 9.6 million square feet of GLA. In addition, the Company has an ownership interest in 22 operating properties, with approximately 3.7 million square feet of GLA, through its Cedar/RioCan joint venture in which the Company has a 20% interest. The Company believes it gains additional benefits with tenants and vendors by having an interest in managing these additional properties within its primary markets. The entire managed portfolio, including the Cedar/RioCan properties, was approximately 91.9% leased at June 30, 2012 (67 operating properties – 90.2%; Cedar/RioCan joint venture properties – 96.4%).

In keeping with its stated goal of reducing overall leverage to an appropriate level by selling non-core assets, the Company determined (1) to completely exit the Ohio market, principally the Discount Drug Mart portfolio of drugstore/convenience centers, and concentrate on the mid-Atlantic and Northeast coastal regions (two properties sold in 2012 and two properties “held for sale” as of June 30, 2012), (2) to concentrate on grocery-anchored strip centers, by disposing of its mall and single-tenant/triple-net-lease properties (seven properties sold in 2012 and four properties “held for sale” as of June 30, 2012), and (3) to focus on improving operations and performance at the Company’s remaining properties, and to reduce development activities, by disposing of certain development projects, land acquired for development, and other non-core assets (two properties sold in 2012 and four properties “held for sale” as of June 30, 2012). In addition, discontinued operations reflect the anticipated consummation of the Homburg joint venture buy/sell transactions (seven properties “held for sale” as of June 30, 2012).

The Company derives substantially all of its revenues from rents and operating expense reimbursements received pursuant to long-term leases. The Company’s operating results therefore depend on the ability of its tenants to make the payments required by the terms of their leases. The Company focuses its investment activities on supermarket-anchored community shopping centers. The Company believes that, because of the need of consumers to purchase food and other staple goods and services generally available at such centers, its type of “necessities-based” properties should provide relatively stable revenue flows even during difficult economic times.

25

##### Table of Contents

Significant Transactions

Discontinued Operations

The following table details dispositions of properties “held for sale/conveyance” during the six months ended June 30, 2012:

|  | Percent |  |  |  |  |  |  | Date |  |  | Sales |
Property |  | owned |  | Location |  | GLA |  |  | Sold |  |  | Price |
Hilliard Discount Drug Mart Plaza |  | 100% |  | Hilliard, OH |  |  | 40,988 |  |  |  | 2/7/2012 |  |  | $ | 1,434,000 |
First Merit Bank at Akron |  | 100% |  | Akron, OH |  |  | 3,200 |  |  |  | 2/23/2012 |  |  |  | 633,000 |
Grove City Discount Drug Mart Plaza |  | 100% |  | Grove City, OH |  |  | 40,848 |  |  |  | 3/12/2012 |  |  |  | 1,925,000 |
CVS at Naugatuck |  | 50% |  | Naugatuck, CT |  |  | 13,225 |  |  |  | 3/20/2012 |  |  |  | 3,350,000 |
CVS at Bradford |  | 100% |  | Bradford, PA |  |  | 10,722 |  |  |  | 3/30/2012 |  |  |  | 967,000 |
CVS at Celina |  | 100% |  | Celina, OH |  |  | 10,195 |  |  |  | 3/30/2012 |  |  |  | 1,449,000 |
CVS at Erie |  | 100% |  | Erie, PA |  |  | 10,125 |  |  |  | 3/30/2012 |  |  |  | 1,278,000 |
CVS at Portage Trail |  | 100% |  | Akron, OH |  |  | 10,722 |  |  |  | 3/30/2012 |  |  |  | 1,061,000 |
Rite Aid at Massillon |  | 100% |  | Massillon, OH |  |  | 10,125 |  |  |  | 3/30/2012 |  |  |  | 1,492,000 |
Kingston Plaza |  | 100% |  | Kingston, NY |  |  | 5,324 |  |  |  | 4/12/2012 |  |  |  | 1,182,000 |
Stadium Plaza |  | 100% |  | East Lansing, MI |  |  | 77,688 |  |  |  | 5/3/2012 |  |  |  | 5,400,000 |
Blue Mountain Commons (land parcel) |  | 100% |  | Harrisburg. PA |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 6/19/2012 |  |  |  | 102,000 |
Oregon Pike (land parcel) |  | 100% |  | Lancaster, PA |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 6/28/2012 |  |  |  | 1,100,000 |
Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 21,373,000 |

New Credit Facility

On January 26, 2012, the Company entered into a $300 million secured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility amends, restates and consolidates the Company’s prior $185 million stabilized property revolving credit facility and its $150 million development property credit facility that were due to expire on January 31, 2012 and June 13, 2012, respectively. See “Liquidity” below for additional details.

26

##### Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Change |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | Dollars |  |  | Percent |
Revenues |  | $ | 36,990,000 |  |  | $ | 32,578,000 |  |  | $ | 4,412,000 |  |  |  | 13.5 | %
Property operating expenses |  |  | 9,772,000 |  |  |  | 9,901,000 |  |  |  | (129,000 | ) |  |  | -1.3 | %
Property operating income |  |  | 27,218,000 |  |  |  | 22,677,000 |  |  |  | 4,541,000 |  |  |  | 20.0 | %
General and administrative |  |  | (3,737,000 | ) |  |  | (2,691,000 | ) |  |  | (1,046,000 | ) |  |  | 38.9 | %
Management transition charges |  |  | — |  |  |  | (6,350,000 | ) |  |  | 6,350,000 |  |  |  | n/a |
Acquisition transaction costs and terminated projects |  |  | — |  |  |  | (73,000 | ) |  |  | 73,000 |  |  |  | n/a |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | (9,796,000 | ) |  |  | (9,311,000 | ) |  |  | (485,000 | ) |  |  | 5.2 | %
Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs |  |  | (9,744,000 | ) |  |  | (10,177,000 | ) |  |  | 433,000 |  |  |  | -4.3 | %
Interest income |  |  | 62,000 |  |  |  | 129,000 |  |  |  | (67,000 | ) |  |  | -51.9 | %
Unconsolidated joint ventures: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Equity in income |  |  | 576,000 |  |  |  | 34,000 |  |  |  | 542,000 |  |  |  | 1594.1 | %
Write-off of investment |  |  | — |  |  |  | (7,961,000 | ) |  |  | 7,961,000 |  |  |  | n/a |
Gain on sales |  |  | 79,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 79,000 |  |  |  | n/a |
Income (loss) from continuing operations |  |  | 4,658,000 |  |  |  | (13,723,000 | ) |  |  | 18,381,000 |  |  |  |  |
Discontinued operations: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income from operations |  |  | 944,000 |  |  |  | 778,000 |  |  |  | 166,000 |  |  |  | 21.3 | %
Impairment charges |  |  | — |  |  |  | (12,258,000 | ) |  |  | 12,258,000 |  |  |  | n/a |
Gain on sales |  |  | 293,000 |  |  |  | 474,000 |  |  |  | (181,000 | ) |  |  | n/a |
Net income (loss) |  |  | 5,895,000 |  |  |  | (24,729,000 | ) |  |  | 30,624,000 |  |  |  |  |
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |  |  | 670,000 |  |  |  | (601,000 | ) |  |  | 1,271,000 |  |  |  |  |
Net income (loss) attributable to Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. |  | $ | 5,225,000 |  |  | $ | (24,128,000 | ) |  | $ | 29,353,000 |  |  |  |  |

Properties held in both periods. The Company held 67 properties (excluding properties “held for sale/conveyance”) during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

Revenues were higher primarily as a result of (i) lease termination income ($3.0 million), (ii) rental revenues and expense recoveries at operating properties ($0.7 million), (iii) rental revenues and expense recoveries at ground-up development properties ($0.5 million), and (iv) rental revenues and expense recoveries at redevelopment properties ($0.2 million).

Property operating expenses were comparable, and included an increase in (i) real estate tax expense ($0.2 million), and a decrease in (ii) non-billable expenses ($0.2 million).

General and administrative expenses were higher primarily as a result of increases in payroll and payroll related expenses, including share-based compensation.

27

##### Table of Contents

Management transition charges in 2011 relate to the retirement of the Company’s then Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President, and the end of the employment of the Company’s then Chief Financial Officer, and include (i) an aggregate of approximately $3.7 million in cash severance payments (including the cost of related payroll taxes and benefits), (ii) the write off of all amounts related to the vesting of restricted share grants (an aggregate of approximately $2.0 million), and (iii) approximately $0.7 million of other non-recurring costs, primarily professional fees and expenses related to the hiring of a new President/Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased principally due to placing into service portions of several redevelopment properties.

Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs decreased primarily as a result of lower amortization of deferred financing costs related to the new credit facility entered into during the first quarter of 2012.

Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures was higher in 2012 as a result of (i) an increase in operating results in 2012 from the Cedar/RioCan joint venture ($0.4 million) and (ii) the tenant at its then redevelopment joint venture in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania vacating the premises in April 2011 ($0.2 million).

Write-off of investment in unconsolidated joint venture in 2011 relates to the Company’s decision not to go forward with the development of two adjacent properties in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The impairment loss for the wholly-owned property is included in loss from discontinued operations.

Discontinued operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 include the results of operations, impairment reversals/charges and gain on sales for properties sold or treated as “held for sale/conveyance”, as part of the Company’s 2011 business plan as more fully discussed elsewhere in this report.

28

##### Table of Contents

Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Change |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | Dollars |  |  | Percent |
Revenues |  | $ | 71,467,000 |  |  | $ | 67,088,000 |  |  | $ | 4,379,000 |  |  |  | 6.5 | %
Property operating expenses |  |  | 20,541,000 |  |  |  | 22,482,000 |  |  |  | (1,941,000 | ) |  |  | -8.6 | %
Property operating income |  |  | 50,926,000 |  |  |  | 44,606,000 |  |  |  | 6,320,000 |  |  |  | 14.2 | %
General and administrative |  |  | (7,362,000 | ) |  |  | (5,205,000 | ) |  |  | (2,157,000 | ) |  |  | 41.4 | %
Management transition charges |  |  | — |  |  |  | (6,530,000 | ) |  |  | 6,530,000 |  |  |  | n/a |
Acquisition transaction costs and terminated projects |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,242,000 | ) |  |  | 1,242,000 |  |  |  | n/a |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | (25,522,000 | ) |  |  | (18,030,000 | ) |  |  | (7,492,000 | ) |  |  | 41.6 | %
Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs |  |  | (19,923,000 | ) |  |  | (20,667,000 | ) |  |  | 744,000 |  |  |  | -3.6 | %
Accelerated write-off of deferred financing costs |  |  | (2,607,000 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (2,607,000 | ) |  |  | n/a |
Interest income |  |  | 124,000 |  |  |  | 177,000 |  |  |  | (53,000 | ) |  |  | -29.9 | %
Unconsolidated joint ventures: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Equity in income |  |  | 1,021,000 |  |  |  | 825,000 |  |  |  | 196,000 |  |  |  | 23.8 | %
Write-off of investment |  |  | — |  |  |  | (7,961,000 | ) |  |  | 7,961,000 |  |  |  | n/a |
Gain on sales |  |  | 79,000 |  |  |  | 28,000 |  |  |  | 51,000 |  |  |  | n/a |
(Loss) from continuing operations |  |  | (3,264,000 | ) |  |  | (13,999,000 | ) |  |  | 10,735,000 |  |  |  |  |
Discontinued operations: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income from operations |  |  | 2,403,000 |  |  |  | 2,247,000 |  |  |  | 156,000 |  |  |  | 6.9 | %
Impairment reversals/(charges) |  |  | 1,138,000 |  |  |  | (22,544,000 | ) |  |  | 23,682,000 |  |  |  | n/a |
Gain on sales |  |  | 750,000 |  |  |  | 474,000 |  |  |  | 276,000 |  |  |  | n/a |
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |  |  | 1,027,000 |  |  |  | (33,822,000 | ) |  |  | 34,849,000 |  |  |  |  |
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |  |  | 1,611,000 |  |  |  | (886,000 | ) |  |  | 2,497,000 |  |  |  |  |
Net loss attributable to Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. |  | $ | (584,000 | ) |  | $ | (32,936,000 | ) |  | $ | 32,352,000 |  |  |  |  |

Properties held in both periods. The Company held 67 properties (excluding properties “held for sale/conveyance”) during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

Revenues were higher primarily as a result of (i) lease termination income ($3.0 million), (ii) rental revenues and expense recoveries at ground-up development properties ($1.0 million), (iii) rental revenues at the Company’s other operating properties ($0.8 million), and (iv) rental revenues and expense recoveries at a property acquired during the first quarter of 2011 ($0.4 million), offset by a decrease in (v) expense recoveries at the Company’s other operating properties, due primarily to a decrease in property operating expenses ($0.9 million).

Property operating expenses were lower primarily as a result of decreases in (i) snow removal costs ($2.0 million), (ii) other non-billable expenses ($0.4 million), and (iii) other operating expenses ($0.2 million), offset by an increase in (iv) real estate tax expenses ($0.5 million).

29

##### Table of Contents

General and administrative expenses were higher primarily as a result of increases in payroll and payroll related expenses, including share-based compensation.

Management transition charges in 2011 relate to the retirement of the Company’s then Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President, and the end of the employment of the Company’s then Chief Financial Officer, and include (i) an aggregate of approximately $3.7 million in cash severance payments (including the cost of related payroll taxes and benefits), (ii) the write off of all amounts related to the vesting of restricted share grants (an aggregate of approximately $2.0 million), and (iii) approximately $0.8 million of other non-recurring costs, primarily professional fees and expenses related to the hiring of a new President/Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

Acquisition transaction costs and terminated projects for 2011 include (i) costs incurred related to a property acquisition ($0.7 million), and (ii) termination of several redevelopment projects that the Company determined would not go forward ($0.4 million).

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased principally by the lease up of a vacant space at a property which required the demolition of an existing building and the related acceleration of depreciation expense.

Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs decreased primarily as a result of lower amortization of deferred financing costs related to the new credit facility entered into during the first quarter of 2012.

Accelerated write-off of deferred financing costs in 2012 relates to the write-off of unamortized fees associated with the Company’s terminated stabilized property and development property credit facilities.

Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures was higher in 2012 as a result of (i) an increase in operating results in 2012 from the Cedar/RioCan joint venture ($0.5 million) and (ii) the tenant at its then redevelopment joint venture in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania vacating the premises in April 2011 ($0.3 million).

Write-off of investment in unconsolidated joint venture in 2011 relates to the Company’s decision not to go forward with the development of two adjacent properties in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The impairment loss for the wholly-owned property is included in loss from discontinued operations.

Discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 include the results of operations, impairment reversals/charges and gain on sales for properties sold or treated as “held for sale/conveyance”, as part of the Company’s 2011 business plan as more fully discussed elsewhere in this report.

30

##### Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company funds operating expenses and other short-term liquidity requirements, including debt service, tenant improvements, leasing commissions, preferred and common dividend distributions and distributions to minority interest partners, if made, primarily from its operations and distributions received from the Cedar/RioCan joint venture. The Company may also use its revolving credit facility for these purposes. The Company expects to fund long-term liquidity requirements for property acquisitions, redevelopment costs, remaining development costs, capital improvements, joint venture contributions, and maturing debt initially with its credit facilities, and ultimately through a combination of issuing and/or assuming additional mortgage debt, the sale of equity securities, the issuance of additional OP Units, and the sale of properties or interests therein (including joint venture arrangements). Although the Company believes it has access to secured financing, there can be no assurance that the Company will have the availability of mortgage financing on completed development projects, additional construction financing, net proceeds from the contribution of properties to joint ventures, or proceeds from the refinancing of existing debt.

Debt is comprised of the following at June 30, 2012:

|  |  |  |  | Interest rates
|  | Balance |  |  | Weighted - |  |  |
Description |  | outstanding |  |  | average |  |  | Range
Fixed-rate mortgages |  | $ | 498,922,000 |  |  |  | 5.8 | % |  | 5.0% - 7.5%
Variable-rate mortgage |  |  | 63,326,000 |  |  |  | 3.0 | % |  |
Total property-specific mortgages |  |  | 562,248,000 |  |  |  | 5.5 | % |  |
Corporate credit facilities : |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Revolving facility |  |  | 104,500,000 |  |  |  | 3.0 | % |  |
Term loan |  |  | 75,000,000 |  |  |  | 3.0 | % |  |
|  | $ | 741,748,000 |  |  |  | 4.9 | % |  |

As noted above, on January 26, 2012, the Company entered into a new $300 million Credit Facility, comprised of a four-year $75 million term loan and a three-year $225 million revolving credit facility, subject to collateral in place. Subject to customary conditions, the term loan and the revolving credit facility may both be extended for one additional year at the Company’s option. Under an accordion feature, the Credit Facility can be increased to $500 million, subject to customary conditions, collateral in place and lending commitments from participating banks. The Credit Facility contains financial covenants including, but not limited to, maximum debt leverage, minimum interest coverage, minimum fixed charge coverage, and minimum net worth. In addition, the Credit Facility contains restrictions including, but not limited to, limits on indebtedness, certain investments and distributions. The Credit Facility is available to fund acquisitions, redevelopment and remaining development activities, capital expenditures, mortgage repayments, dividend distributions, working capital and other general corporate purposes. Borrowings under the Credit Facility are priced at LIBOR plus 275 bps (a weighted-average of 3.0% per annum at June 30, 2012) and can range from LIBOR plus 200 to 300 bps based on the Company’s leverage ratio. As of June 30, 2012, the Company has $104.5 million outstanding under the revolving credit portion of the Credit Facility, and had $78.3 million available for additional borrowings as of the date.

31

##### Table of Contents

The variable-rate mortgage represents a $70.7 million construction facility pursuant to which the Company has pledged its Upland Square joint venture ground-up development property, located in Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, as collateral for borrowings thereunder. The facility is guaranteed by the Company and will expire in October 2013, subject to a one-year extension option. Borrowings under the facility bear interest at the Company’s option at either LIBOR plus a spread of 275 bps or the agent bank’s prime rate plus a spread of 125 bps, with principal payable based on a 30-year amortization schedule. Borrowings outstanding under the facility aggregated $63.3 million at June 30, 2012 and such borrowings bore interest at a rate of 3.0% per annum.

Other property-specific mortgage loans payable at June 30, 2012 consisted of fixed-rate notes totaling $498.9 million, with a weighted average interest rate of 5.8%. For the remainder of 2012, the Company has approximately $4.5 million of scheduled debt principal amortization payments and $8.2 million of scheduled balloon payments.

Total mortgage loans payable and secured credit facilities have an overall weighted average interest rate of 4.9% and mature at various dates through 2029. The terms of several of the Company’s mortgage loans payable require the Company to deposit certain replacement and other reserves with its lenders. Such “restricted cash” is generally available only for property-level requirements for which the reserves have been established, and is not available to fund other property-level or Company-level obligations.

In order to continue qualifying as a REIT, the Company is required to distribute at least 90% of its “REIT taxable income”, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Company paid dividends totaling $0.36 per share during 2011. However, in keeping with its stated goal of reducing overall leverage, and in order to improve financial flexibility, the Company’s Board of Directors determined to reduce the quarterly dividend for 2012 to a target rate of $0.05 per share (an annual rate of $0.20 per share). While the Company intends to continue paying regular quarterly dividends, future dividend declarations will continue to be at the discretion of the Board of Directors, and will depend on the cash flow and financial condition of the Company, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code, and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant.

32

##### Table of Contents

Contractual obligations and commercial commitments

The following table sets forth the Company’s significant debt repayment, interest and operating lease obligations at June 30, 2012:

|  | Maturity Date |
|  | Remainder of |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |  |  | 2016 |  |  | Thereafter |  |  | Total |
Debt: (i) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Mortgage loans payable (ii) |  | $ | 12,698,000 |  |  | $ | 125,315,000 |  |  | $ | 106,423,000 |  |  | $ | 77,321,000 |  |  | $ | 98,922,000 |  |  | $ | 141,569,000 |  |  | $ | 562,248,000 |
Credit facilities (iii) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 104,500,000 |  |  |  | 75,000,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 179,500,000 |
Interest payments (iv) |  |  | 18,753,000 |  |  |  | 32,442,000 |  |  |  | 26,748,000 |  |  |  | 16,835,000 |  |  |  | 12,723,000 |  |  |  | 20,040,000 |  |  |  | 127,541,000 |
Operating lease obligations |  |  | 745,000 |  |  |  | 1,501,000 |  |  |  | 1,515,000 |  |  |  | 1,530,000 |  |  |  | 1,539,000 |  |  |  | 11,257,000 |  |  |  | 18,087,000 |
Total |  | $ | 32,196,000 |  |  | $ | 159,258,000 |  |  | $ | 134,686,000 |  |  | $ | 200,186,000 |  |  | $ | 188,184,000 |  |  | $ | 172,866,000 |  |  | $ | 887,376,000 |

(i) | Does not include amounts applicable to unconsolidated joint ventures or discontinued operations.

(ii) | Mortgage loans payable for 2013 includes $62.2 million applicable to property-specific construction financing which is subject to a one-year extension option.

(iii) | Each credit facility is subject to a one-year extension option.

(iv) | Represents interest payments expected to be incurred on the Company’s consolidated debt obligations as of June 30, 2012, including capitalized interest. For variable-rate debt, the rate in effect at June 30, 2012 is assumed to remain in effect until the maturities of the respective obligations.

Net Cash Flows

|  | June 30, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Cash flows provided by (used in): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Operating activities |  | $ | 28,091,000 |  |  | $ | 13,566,000 |
Investing activities |  | $ | 8,195,000 |  |  | $ | (56,428,000 | )
Financing activities |  | $ | (40,762,000 | ) |  | $ | 42,122,000 |

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities, before net changes in operating assets and liabilities, increased to $28.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $21.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Such amounts include $3.0 million of lease termination income received in 2012 and expenditures of $3.8 million for management transition charges in 2011. The net changes in operating assets and liabilities ($43,000 in 2012 and $(8.1) million in 2011) were primarily the result of collections of receivables and the timing of payments of accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

33

##### Table of Contents

Investing Activities

Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities were primarily the result of the Cedar/RioCan joint venture transactions, expenditures for property improvements, and the Company’s property disposition activities. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company received proceeds from sales of properties treated as discontinued operations ($16.8 million), had distributions of capital from the Cedar/RioCan joint venture ($1.6 million), and applied the proceeds from other escrows ($1.4 million), offset by expenditures for property improvements ($11.6 million). During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company acquired a grocery-anchored shopping center and incurred expenditures for property improvements (an aggregate of $63.2 million), had an increase in construction escrows and other ($6.6 million), had investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures ($4.2 million), offset by proceeds from sales of properties treated as discontinued operations ($11.6 million), distributions of capital from the Cedar/RioCan joint venture ($3.0 million), and net proceeds relating to the properties transferred to the Cedar/RioCan joint venture ($2.9 million).

Financing Activities

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company had repayments of mortgage obligations ($31.9 million), preferred and common stock distributions ($14.4 million), redemptions and repurchases of the 8.875% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ($9.4 million), the payment of debt financing costs ($4.3 million), and distributions to noncontrolling interest (minority interest and limited partners—$3.6 million), offset by net advances under its credit facilities ($13.2 million) and proceeds from the sale of the 7.25% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ($9.8 million). During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company received net advances from its revolving credit facilities ($34.5 million), received proceeds from mortgage refinancings ($29.3 million), and proceeds from the sale of common stock ($4.3 million), offset by preferred and common stock distributions ($19.2 million), repayment of mortgage obligations ($4.8 million), and distributions to noncontrolling interests (minority interest and limited partners—$2.2 million).

Funds From Operations

Funds From Operations “FFO” is a widely-recognized non-GAAP financial measure for REITs that the Company believes, when considered with financial statements determined in accordance with GAAP, is useful to investors in understanding financial performance and providing a relevant basis for comparison among REITs. In addition, FFO is useful to investors as it captures features particular to real estate performance by recognizing that real estate generally appreciates over time or maintains residual value to a much greater extent than do other depreciable assets. Investors should review FFO, along with GAAP net income, when trying to understand a REIT’s operating performance. The Company considers FFO an important supplemental measure of its operating performance and believes that it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs.

34

##### Table of Contents

The Company computes FFO in accordance with the “White Paper” published by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”), which defines FFO as net income applicable to common shareholders (determined in accordance with GAAP), excluding impairment charges, gains or losses from debt restructurings and sales of properties, plus real estate-related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for partnerships and joint ventures (which are computed to reflect FFO on the same basis). FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities and should not be considered as an alternative to net income applicable to common shareholders or to cash flow from operating activities. FFO is not indicative of cash available to fund ongoing cash needs, including the ability to make cash distributions. Although FFO is a measure used for comparability in assessing the performance of REITs, as the NAREIT White Paper only provides guidelines for computing FFO, the computation of FFO may vary from one company to another. The following table sets forth the Company’s calculations of FFO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |  | $ | 1,236,000 |  |  | $ | (27,668,000 | ) |  | $ | (8,104,000 | ) |  | $ | (39,977,000 | )
Add (deduct): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Real estate depreciation and amortization |  |  | 9,712,000 |  |  |  | 10,939,000 |  |  |  | 25,392,000 |  |  |  | 21,349,000 |
Limited partners’ interest |  |  | 8,000 |  |  |  | (579,000 | ) |  |  | (97,000 | ) |  |  | (839,000 | )
Impairment charges/(reversals) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 20,247,000 |  |  |  | (1,138,000 | ) |  |  | 30,533,000 |
Gain on sales |  |  | (372,000 | ) |  |  | (474,000 | ) |  |  | (829,000 | ) |  |  | (502,000 | )
Consolidated minority interests: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Share of income |  |  | 662,000 |  |  |  | (22,000 | ) |  |  | 1,708,000 |  |  |  | (47,000 | )
Share of FFO |  |  | (1,377,000 | ) |  |  | (1,476,000 | ) |  |  | (2,791,000 | ) |  |  | (2,980,000 | )
Unconsolidated joint ventures: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Share of income |  |  | (576,000 | ) |  |  | (34,000 | ) |  |  | (1,021,000 | ) |  |  | (825,000 | )
Share of FFO |  |  | 1,587,000 |  |  |  | 1,182,000 |  |  |  | 3,056,000 |  |  |  | 3,064,000 |
FFO |  | $ | 10,880,000 |  |  | $ | 2,115,000 |  |  | $ | 16,176,000 |  |  | $ | 9,776,000 |

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

One of the principal market risks facing the Company is interest rate risk on its credit facilities. The Company may, when advantageous, hedge its interest rate risk by using derivative financial instruments. The Company is not subject to foreign currency risk.

The Company is exposed to interest rate changes primarily through (i) the variable-rate credit facilities used to maintain liquidity, fund capital expenditures and ground-up development/redevelopment activities, and expand its real estate investment portfolio, (ii) property-specific variable-rate construction financing, and (iii) other property-specific variable-rate mortgages. The Company’s objectives with respect to interest rate risk are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on operations and cash flows, and to lower its overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, the Company may borrow at fixed rates and may enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps, caps, etc., in order to mitigate its interest rate risk on a related variable-rate financial instrument. The Company does not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes. At June 30, 2012, the Company had approximately $31.8 million of mortgage loans payable subject to interest rate swaps which converted LIBOR-based variable rates to fixed annual rates ranging from 5.2% to 6.5% per annum. At that date, the Company had accrued liabilities of $1.9 million (included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet) relating to the fair value of interest rate swaps applicable to these mortgage loans payable.

35

##### Table of Contents

At June 30, 2012, long-term debt consisted of fixed-rate mortgage loans payable and variable-rate debt (principally the Company’s variable-rate credit facilities). The average interest rate on the $498.9 million of fixed-rate indebtedness outstanding was 5.8%, with maturities at various dates through 2029. The average interest rate on the $242.8 million of variable-rate debt (including $179.5 million in advances under the Company’s Credit Facility) was 3.0%. The $75 million term loan segment of the new facility matures in January 2016, and the $104.5 million revolving credit segment matures in January 2015, each subject to a one-year extension option. With respect to the $242.8 million of variable-rate debt outstanding at June 30, 2012, if interest rates either increase or decrease by 1%, the Company’s interest cost would increase or decrease respectively by approximately $2.4 million per annum.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is reported within the time periods specified in the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In this regard, the Company has formed a Disclosure Committee currently comprised of several of the Company’s executive officers as well as certain other employees with knowledge of information that may be considered in the SEC reporting process. The Committee has responsibility for the development and assessment of the financial and non-financial information to be included in the reports filed with the SEC, and assists the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer in connection with their certifications contained in the Company’s SEC filings. The Committee meets regularly and reports to the Audit Committee on a quarterly or more frequent basis. The Company’s principal executive and financial officers have evaluated its disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2012, and have determined that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, there have been no changes in the internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, these internal controls over financial reporting.

36

##### Table of Contents

Part II Other Information

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(c) Repurchases of 8.875% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

The following sets forth certain information relating to open-market purchases by the Company of its 8.875% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock during the three months ended June 30, 2012:

Period |  | Total number of shares purchased |  |  | Average price paid per share |  |  | Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs (a) |  |  | Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs (b) |
April 1 through April 30 |  |  | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 6,400,000 |
May 1 through May 31 |  |  | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 6,400,000 |
June 1 through June 30 |  |  | 20,000 |  |  | $ | 25.13 |  |  |  | 20,000 |  |  |  | 6,020,000 |
|  |  | 20,000 |  |  | $ | 25.13 |  |  |  | 20,000 |  |  |  | 6,020,000 |

(a) | The Company intends to use the net proceeds from periodic sales of its new 7.25% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock for general working capital and other corporate purposes, including potential future repurchases or redemptions of its 8.875% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and/or the repayment of outstanding indebtedness.

(b) | In addition to the open-market purchases to date, on June 28, 2012, the Company redeemed 360,000 shares of its 8.875% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit 31 |  | Section 302 Certifications
Exhibit 32 |  | Section 906 Certifications
Exhibit 101.INS |  | XBRL Instance Document
Exhibit 101.SCH |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
Exhibit 101.CAL |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.DEF |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.LAB |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.PRE |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

37

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC. |  |  |  |
By: |  | /s/ BRUCE J. SCHANZER |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ PHILIP R. MAYS
|  | Bruce J. Schanzer |  |  |  |  |  | Philip R. Mays
|  | President and Chief |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|  | Executive Officer |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal financial officer)
|  | (Principal executive officer) |  |  |  |  |  |
August 9, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  |

38