XML 26 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v2.3.0.15

Fair Value Measurements | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Sep. 30, 2011
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract] |
Fair Value Measurements | Fair Value Measurements Fair value is determined based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the asset’s principal market, or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. TVA uses market or observable inputs as the preferred source of values, followed by assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. Valuation Techniques There are three main approaches to measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities: (1) the market approach; (2) the income approach; and (3) the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated from market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present value amount. The measurement is based on the value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts of income. The cost approach is based on the amount that would currently be required to replace an asset. TVA uses the market approach and the income approach in its fair value measurements. The valuation techniques used to measure fair value are based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect TVA’s market assumptions. These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:
Level 1 | — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets accessible by the reporting entity for identical assets or liabilities. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing.
Level 2 | — | Pricing inputs other than quoted market prices included in Level 1 that are based on observable market data and that are directly or indirectly observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. These include quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted market prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, adjusted quoted market prices, inputs from observable data such as interest rate and yield curves, volatilities and default rates observable at commonly quoted intervals, and inputs derived from observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 | — | Pricing inputs that are unobservable, or less observable, from objective sources. Unobservable inputs are only to be used to the extent observable inputs are not available. These inputs maintain the concept of an exit price from the perspective of a market participant and should reflect assumptions of other market participants. An entity should consider all market participant assumptions that are available without unreasonable cost and effort. These are given the lowest priority and are generally used in internally developed methodologies to generate management's best estimate of the fair value when no observable market data is available.
A financial instrument's level within the fair value hierarchy (where Level 3 is the lowest and Level 1 is the highest) is based on the lowest level of input significant to the fair value measurement. The following sections describe the valuation methodologies TVA uses to measure different financial instruments at fair value. Except for gains and losses on SERP assets, all changes in fair value of these assets and liabilities have been reflected as changes in regulatory assets, regulatory liabilities, or accumulated other comprehensive loss on TVA’s Balance Sheet at September 30, 2011, and Statements of Changes in Proprietary Capital for the year ended September 30, 2011. Except for gains and losses on SERP assets, there has been no impact to the Statements of Operations or the Statements of Cash Flows related to these fair value measurements. Investments At September 30, 2011, TVA’s investment funds were composed of $1.2 billion of securities classified as trading and measured at fair value and $2 million of equity investments not required to be measured at fair value. Trading securities are held in the NDT, ART, and SERP. The NDT holds funds for the ultimate decommissioning of TVA’s nuclear power plants. The ART holds funds for the costs related to the future closure and retirement of TVA’s long-lived assets. TVA established a SERP for certain executives in critical positions to provide supplemental pension benefits tied to compensation that exceeds limits imposed by IRS rules applicable to the qualified defined benefit pension plan. The NDT and SERP are invested in securities generally designed to achieve a return in line with overall equity market performance. The ART is presently invested to achieve a return in line with fixed-income market performance. The NDT, ART, and SERP are composed of multiple types of investments and are managed by external institutional managers. Most U.S. and international equities, Treasury inflation-protected securities, real estate investment trust (“REIT”) securities, and cash securities, and certain derivative instruments are measured based on quoted exchange prices in active markets and are classified as Level 1 valuations. Fixed-income investments, high-yield fixed-income investments, currencies, and most derivative instruments are non-exchange traded and are classified as Level 2 valuations. These measurements are based on market and income approaches with observable market inputs. Private partnership investments may include venture capital, buyout, mezzanine or subordinated debt, restructuring or distressed debt, and special situations. Investments in private partnerships generally involve a three to four year investment period where the investor contributes capital. This is followed by a period of distribution, typically over several years. The investment period is generally, at minimum, a 10-year or longer investment commitment. The NDT had unfunded commitments related to private partnerships of $77 million at September 30, 2011. These investments have no redemption or limited redemption options and may also restrict the NDT’s ability to liquidate its investment interest. The private partnerships and other similar alternative investments are reported at fair value, which is derived by independent appraisals or judgment of the general partners of each such investment. The inputs used in estimating the fair value of the limited partnerships include the original transaction prices, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investments of comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations and other transactions across the capital structure, offerings in the equity or debt capital markets, and changes in financial ratios or cash flows of the limited partnerships. The fair value of these investments may also be adjusted to reflect liquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discounts estimated by the general partners in the absence of market information. Due to the lack of observable inputs, the determination of the fair value by the general partners may differ materially from the value ultimately realized from the private partnership investments. TVA classifies its interest in these types of investment as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. Commingled funds represent investment funds comprising multiple individual financial instruments. The commingled funds held by the NDT and SERP consist either of a single class of securities, such as equity, debt, or foreign currency securities, or multiple classes of securities. All underlying positions in these commingled funds are either exchange traded (Level 1) or measured using observable inputs for similar instruments (Level 2). The fair value of commingled funds is based on net asset values (“NAV”) per fund share (the unit of account), derived from the prices of the underlying securities in the funds. These commingled funds can be liquidated at the measurement date NAV price and are classified as Level 2 valuations. Required notification periods range from zero to 30 days. The funds can be redeemed unless doing so would violate regulations to which the fund is subject, would be unreasonable or impracticable, or would be seriously prejudicial to the fund. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on trading securities are recognized in current earnings and are based on average cost. The SERP had unrealized gains of $7 million for the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. The gains and losses of the NDT and ART both are subsequently reclassified to a regulatory liability or asset account in accordance with TVA’s regulatory accounting policy. The NDT had unrealized losses of $73 million for the year ended September 30, 2011, compared with a $93 million unrealized gain for the year ended September 30, 2010. The ART had unrealized losses of $18 million for the year ended September 30, 2011, compared with unrealized losses of less than $1 million for the year ended September 30, 2010. Currency Swaps, Swaption, and Interest Rate Swaps See Note 13 — Overview of Accounting Treatment and — Derivatives Not Receiving Hedge Accounting Treatment for a discussion of the nature, purpose, and contingent features of TVA’s currency swaps, swaption, and interest rate swaps. The currency swaps and interest rate swaps are classified as Level 2 valuations and are valued based on income approaches using observable market inputs for similar instruments. The swaption is classified as a Level 3 valuation and is valued based on an income approach. The valuation is computed using a broker-provided pricing model utilizing interest and volatility rates. While most of the fair value measurement is based on observable inputs, volatility for TVA’s swaption is generally unobservable. Therefore, the valuation is derived from an observable volatility measure with adjustments. Commodity Contract Derivatives and Commodity Derivatives under FTP Commodity Contract Derivatives. These contracts are classified as Level 3 valuations and are valued based on income approaches. TVA develops an overall coal price forecast using widely-used short-term and mid-range market data from an external pricing specialist in addition to long-term internal estimates. To value the volume option component of applicable coal contracts, TVA uses a Black-Scholes pricing model which includes inputs from overall coal price forecasts, contract-specific terms, and other market inputs. Commodity Derivatives Under FTP. These contracts are valued based on market approaches which utilize Chicago Mercantile Exchange ("CME") quoted prices and other observable inputs. Futures and options contracts settled on the CME are classified as Level 1 valuations. Swap contracts are valued using a pricing model based on CME inputs and are subject to nonperformance risk outside of the exit price. These contracts are classified as Level 2 valuations. See Note 13 — Derivatives Not Receiving Hedge Accounting Treatment — Commodity Derivatives and Derivatives Under FTP for a discussion of the nature and purpose of coal contracts and derivatives under TVA’s FTP. Nonperformance Risk The impact of nonperformance risk, which includes credit risk, considers changes in current market conditions, readily available information on nonperformance risk, letters of credit, collateral, other arrangements available, and the nature of master netting arrangements. TVA is a counterparty to currency swaps, a swaption, interest rate swaps, commodity contracts, and other derivatives which subject TVA to nonperformance risk. Nonperformance risk on the majority of investments and certain exchange-traded instruments held by TVA is incorporated into the exit price that is derived from quoted market data that is used to mark the investment to market. Nonperformance risk for most of TVA’s derivative instruments is an adjustment to the initial asset/liability fair value. TVA adjusts for nonperformance risk, both of TVA (for liabilities) and the counterparty (for assets), by applying a credit valuation adjustment ("CVA"). TVA determines an appropriate CVA for each applicable financial instrument based on the term of the instrument and TVA’s or counterparty’s credit rating as obtained from Moody’s. For companies that do not have an observable credit rating, TVA uses internal analysis to assign a comparable rating to the company. TVA discounts each financial instrument using the historical default rate (as reported by Moody’s for CY 1983 to CY 2010) for companies with a similar credit rating over a time period consistent with the remaining term of the contract. The application of CVAs resulted in a $108 million decrease in the fair value of assets and a $2 million decrease in the fair value of liabilities at September 30, 2011. The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, TVA's financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2011. Financial assets and liabilities have been classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. TVA's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the determination of the fair value of the assets and liabilities and their classification in the fair value hierarchy levels.
Fair Value Measurements At September 30, 2011
Assets | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |  | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |  | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |  | Netting(1) |  | Total
Investments |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Equity securities | $ | 73 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 73 |
Debt securities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
U.S. government corporations and agencies | 117 |  |  | 79 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 196 |
Corporate debt securities | — |  |  | 164 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 164 |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | — |  |  | 17 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 17 |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | — |  |  | 3 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 3 |
Collateralized debt obligations | — |  |  | 3 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 3 |
Private partnerships | — |  |  | — |  |  | 22 |  |  | — |  |  | 22 |
Commingled funds(2) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Equity security commingled funds | — |  |  | 467 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 467 |
Debt security commingled funds | — |  |  | 221 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 221 |
Foreign currency commingled funds | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Other commingled funds | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Total investments | 190 |  |  | 954 |  |  | 22 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,166 |
Commodity contract derivatives | — |  |  | — |  |  | 436 |  |  | — |  |  | 436 |
Commodity derivatives under FTP |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Swap contracts | — |  |  | 15 |  |  | — |  |  | (14 | ) |  | 1 |
Total commodity derivatives under FTP | — |  |  | 15 |  |  | — |  |  | (14 | ) |  | 1 |
Total | $ | 190 |  |  | $ | 969 |  |  | $ | 458 |  |  | $ | (14 | ) |  | $ | 1,603 |
Liabilities | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Liabilities (Level 1) |  | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |  | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |  | Netting(1) |  | Total
Currency swaps | $ | — |  |  | $ | 131 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 131 |
Interest rate swaps | — |  |  | 463 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 463 |
Swaption | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1,077 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,077 |
Commodity contract derivatives | — |  |  | — |  |  | 197 |  |  | — |  |  | 197 |
Commodity derivatives under FTP |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Futures contracts | 4 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 4 |
Swap contracts | — |  |  | 244 |  |  | — |  |  | (14 | ) |  | 230 |
Option contracts | 1 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1 |
Total commodity derivatives under FTP | 5 |  |  | 244 |  |  | — |  |  | (14 | ) |  | 235 |
Total | $ | 5 |  |  | $ | 838 |  |  | $ | 1,274 |  |  | $ | (14 | ) |  | $ | 2,103 |
Notes (1) Due to the right of setoff and method of settlement, TVA elects to record commodity derivatives under the FTP based on its net commodity position with the counterparty or broker. (2) Commingled funds represent investment funds comprising multiple individual financial instruments and are classified in the table based on their existing investment portfolio as of the measurement date. Commingled funds exclusively composed of one class of security are classified in that category. Commingled funds comprising multiple classes of securities are classified as “other commingled funds.”
Fair Value Measurements At September 30, 2010
Assets | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |  | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |  | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |  | Netting(1) |  | Total
Investments |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Equity securities | $ | 96 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 96 |
Debt securities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
U.S. government corporations and agencies | 136 |  |  | 57 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 193 |
Corporate debt securities | — |  |  | 193 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 193 |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | — |  |  | 22 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 22 |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | — |  |  | 2 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 2 |
Collateralized debt obligations | — |  |  | 3 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 3 |
Private partnerships | — |  |  | — |  |  | 13 |  |  | — |  |  | 13 |
Commingled funds(2) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Equity security commingled funds | — |  |  | 340 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 340 |
Debt security commingled funds | — |  |  | 209 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 209 |
Foreign currency commingled funds | — |  |  | 12 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 12 |
Other commingled funds | — |  |  | 45 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 45 |
Total investments | 232 |  |  | 883 |  |  | 13 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,128 |
Commodity contract derivatives | — |  |  | — |  |  | 152 |  |  | — |  |  | 152 |
Commodity derivatives under FTP |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Futures contracts | 2 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 2 |
Swap contracts | — |  |  | 9 |  |  | — |  |  | (1 | ) |  | 8 |
Total commodity derivatives under FTP | 2 |  |  | 9 |  |  | — |  |  | (1 | ) |  | 10 |
Total | $ | 234 |  |  | $ | 892 |  |  | $ | 165 |  |  | $ | (1 | ) |  | $ | 1,290 |
Liabilities | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Liabilities (Level 1) |  | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |  | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |  | Netting(1) |  | Total
Currency swaps | $ | — |  |  | $ | 81 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 81 |
Interest rate swaps | — |  |  | 371 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 371 |
Swaption | — |  |  | — |  |  | 804 |  |  | — |  |  | 804 |
Commodity contract derivatives | — |  |  | — |  |  | 49 |  |  | — |  |  | 49 |
Commodity derivatives under FTP |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Futures contracts | 21 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 21 |
Swap contracts | 15 |  |  | 227 |  |  | — |  |  | (1 | ) |  | 241 |
Option contracts | 2 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 2 |
Total commodity derivatives under FTP | 38 |  |  | 227 |  |  | — |  |  | (1 | ) |  | 264 |
Total | $ | 38 |  |  | $ | 679 |  |  | $ | 853 |  |  | $ | (1 | ) |  | $ | 1,569 |
Notes (1) Due to the right of setoff and method of settlement, TVA elects to record commodity derivatives under the FTP based on its net commodity position with the counterparty or broker. (2) Commingled funds represent investment funds comprising multiple individual financial instruments and are classified in the table based on their existing investment portfolio as of the measurement date. Commingled funds exclusively composed of one class of security are classified in that category. Commingled funds comprising multiple classes of securities are classified as “other commingled funds.”
The following table presents a reconciliation of all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for year ended September 30, 2011:
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs For the Year Ended September 30
| Private Partnerships |  | Commodity Contract Derivatives |  | Swaption
Balances at October 1, 2009 | $ | — |  |  | $ | 7 |  |  | $ | (592 | )
Purchases | 12 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Issuances | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Settlements | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Total gains or losses (realized or unrealized) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net unrealized gains (losses) deferred as regulatory assets and liabilities | 1 |  |  | 96 |  |  | (212 | )
Balances at September 30, 2010 | 13 |  |  | 103 |  |  | (804 | )
Purchases | 17 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Issuances | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Settlements | (7 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |
Total gains or losses (realized or unrealized) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net unrealized gains (losses) deferred as regulatory assets and liabilities | (1 | ) |  | 136 |  |  | (273 | )
Balances at September 30, 2011 | $ | 22 |  |  | $ | 239 |  |  | $ | (1,077 | )
There were no realized gains or losses related to the instruments measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs that affected net income during the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. All unrealized gains and losses related to these instruments have been reflected as increases or decreases in regulatory assets and liabilities. See Note 7. Other Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value TVA uses the methods and assumptions described below to estimate the fair value of each significant class of financial instrument. The fair market value of the financial instruments held at September 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010, may not be representative of the actual gains or losses that will be recorded when these instruments mature or are called or presented for early redemption. The estimated values of TVA’s financial instruments not recorded at fair value at September 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010, were as follows:
Estimated Values of Financial Instruments At September 30
| 2011 |  | 2010
| Carrying Amount |  | Fair Value |  | Carrying Amount |  | Fair Value
Loans and other long-term receivables, net | $ | 74 |  |  | $ | 68 |  |  | $ | 68 |  |  | $ | 60 |
Long-term debt (including current portion), net | 23,949 |  |  | 29,190 |  |  | 23,397 |  |  | 27,193 |
Because of the short-term maturity of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and investments, and short-term debt, net, the carrying amounts of these instruments approximate their fair values. Fair value of long-term debt traded in the public market is determined by multiplying the par value of the debt by the indicative market price at the balance sheet date. Fair values for loans and other long-term receivables are estimated by determining the present value of future cash flows using a discount rate equal to lending rates for similar loans made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for similar remaining maturities, where applicable. See Note 18 — Fair Value Measurements for disclosure of fair value measurements for investments held by the Tennessee Valley Authority Retirement System ("TVARS") that support TVA’s qualified defined benefit pension plan.

X
- Details
Name: | us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 820 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 5 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6925170&loc=d3e19296-110258 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 159 -Paragraph 17-22, 27, 28 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6947722&loc=d3e13433-108611 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 107 -Paragraph 15C, 15D -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 28 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6957238&loc=d3e14064-108612 Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 16 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6947722&loc=d3e13504-108611 Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 107 -Paragraph 15A -Subparagraph a-d -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 21 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6947722&loc=d3e13537-108611 Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 133 -Paragraph 44A, 44B -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 820 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6925170&loc=d3e19207-110258 Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 30 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6957238&loc=d3e14172-108612 Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 107 -Paragraph 3, 10, 14, 15 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 107 -Paragraph 15B -Subparagraph a, b -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 157 -Paragraph 32, 33, 34 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration