134
SOFINA
MESSAGE TO
SHAREHOLDERS
KEY INDICATORS STRATEGY
KEY EVENTS
INVESTMENTS OVERVIEW
that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
KEY AUDIT MATTERS
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our profes-
sional judgment, were of most significance in our audit
of the Consolidated Financial Statements of the current
reporting period.
These matters were addressed in the context of our audit
of the Consolidated Financial Statements as a whole and
in forming our opinion thereon, and consequently we do
not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
VALUATION OF UNLISTED INVESTMENTS
Description of the key audit matter
As described in note 2.4 (Fair Value of the total investment
portfolio in transparency) of the Consolidated Financial State-
ments, the Group holds, in its portfolios « Sofina Direct »,
investments in unlisted companies for a total of €4,115,739
thousand, which represents 40% of the total assets.
These investments are classified as « financial assets » within
the definition of IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments, which should
be measured at fair value. The Group applies the « Interna-
tional Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation » (« IPEV »)
guidelines in the valuation of these assets.
The determination of the fair value of these unlisted « finan-
cial assets », for which limited public data is available, is a key
audit matter as it depends on significant estimates and/or
judgements from the management, such as the choice of
the valuation method used and the underlying assump-
tions used. This fair value therefore falls under the level 3
of the fair value hierarchy according to IFRS 13 - Fair Value
Measurement.
Summary of the procedures performed
We have analyzed the valuation process of unlisted « finan-
cial assets » as well as the internal controls related hereon,
in particular the use of an independent specialist to con-
firm the fair values estimated internally and management’s
review controls of these fair values.
We have verified the design and the operational effective-
ness of these internal controls.
We have tested, on the basis of a sampling, the valuation
of these assets focusing on the choice of methods used as
well as on the underlying assumptions. In particular, for
this sample:
• We have reconciled the data used in the valuation models
with relevant and available external sources. These data
used, include the transaction multiples used, the published
results or information coming directly from the manage-
ment of the companies in which a participation is held;
• We verified the mathematical accuracy of the valuation
models;
We have verified the retrospective review of the assumptions
used in the past valuation exercises to validate their accuracy.
We have verified that the impact of the fair value of the
investments on the Consolidated Financial Statements has
been appropriately recognised in the income statement.
Lastly, we have verified that the content of the note 2.4 of
the Consolidated Financial Statements complied with the
requirements of the relevant IFRS standards.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Board of Directors is responsible for the preparation of
the Consolidated Financial Statements that give a true and
fair view in accordance with IFRS and with applicable legal
and regulatory requirements in Belgium and for such inter-
nal controls relevant to the preparation of the Consolidated
Financial Statements that are free from material misstate-
ment, whether due to fraud or error.
As part of the preparation of Consolidated Financial State-
ments, the Board of Directors is responsible for assessing the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, and pro-
vide, if applicable, information on matters impacting going
concern, The Board of Directors should prepare the financial
statements using the going concern basis of accounting,
unless the Board of Directors either intends to liquidate the
Company or to cease business operations, or has no realistic
alternative but to do so.
OUR RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE AUDIT OF
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance whether
the Consolidated Financial Statements are free from mate-
rial misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to
express an opinion on these Consolidated Financial State-
ments based on our audit. Reasonable assurance is a high
level of assurance, but not a guarantee that an audit con-
ducted in accordance with the ISA’s will always detect a
material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can
arise from fraud or error and considered material if, individ-
ually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected
to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the
basis of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
In performing our audit, we comply with the legal, regulatory
and normative framework that applies to the audit of the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Belgium. However, a
statutory audit does not provide assurance about the future
viability of the Company and the Group, nor about the effi-
ciency or effectiveness with which the board of directors
has taken or will undertake the Company's and the Group’s
business operations. Our responsibilities with regards to the
going concern assumption used by the board of directors
are described below.