XML 32 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Financial Instruments Fair Value Risk
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Text Block1 [Abstract]  
Financial Instruments Fair Value Risk

18. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS FAIR VALUE RISK

The Group is exposed to the risks of changes in fair value of its financial assets and liabilities. The following table summarises the fair values and carrying amounts of financial instruments.

 

     € million      million     € million      million  
Fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities            Fair value
2017
            Fair value
2016
            Carrying
amount
2017
            Carrying
amount
2016
 

Financial assets

        

Cash and cash equivalents

     3,317       3,382       3,317       3,382  

Held-to-maturity investments

     163       142       163       142  

Loans and receivables

     463       398       463       398  

Available-for-sale financial assets

     564       509       564       509  

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:

        

Derivatives

     116       91       116       91  

Other

     139       132       139       132  
         4,762           4,654           4,762           4,654  

Financial liabilities

        

Preference shares

     -       (125     -       (68

Bank loans and overdrafts

     (995     (1,147     (992     (1,146

Bonds and other loans

     (23,368     (15,844     (22,709     (15,053

Finance lease creditors

     (147     (165     (131     (143

Derivatives

     (421     (185     (421     (185

Other financial liabilities

     (177     -       (177     -  
       (25,108     (17,466     (24,430     (16,595

 

    

    

    

 

The fair value of trade receivables and payables is considered to be equal to the carrying amount of these items due to their short-term nature. The instruments that have a fair value that is different from the carrying amount are classified as Level 2 for both 2016 and 2017 with exception of preference shares which are classified as Level 1 for both years.

FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY

The fair values shown in notes 15C and 17A have been classified into three categories depending on the inputs used in the valuation technique. The categories used are as follows:

  Level 1: quoted prices for identical instruments;
  Level 2: directly or indirectly observable market inputs, other than Level 1 inputs; and
  Level 3: inputs which are not based on observable market data.

For assets and liabilities which are carried at fair value, the classification of fair value calculations by category is summarised below:

 

            € million       million      € million      million     € million      million     € million      million  
      Notes      Level 1
2017
     Level 1
2016
     Level 2
2017
    Level 2
2016
    Level 3
2017
    Level 3
2016
    Total fair
value
2017
    Total fair
value
2016
 

Assets at fair value

                     

Other cash equivalents

     17A        -        -        80       90       -       -       80       90  

Available-for-sale financial assets

     17A        215        138        7       98       342       273       564       509  

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:

                     

Derivatives(a)

     16C        -        -        173       226       -       -       173       226  

Other

     17A        137        -        -       131       2       1       139       132  

Liabilities at fair value

                     

Derivatives(b)

     16C        -        -        (534     (331     -       -       (534     (331

Contingent consideration

     14        -        -        -       -       (445     (380     (445     (380

 

(a)  Includes 57 million (2016: 135 million) derivatives, reported within trade receivables, that hedge trading activities.
(b)  Includes (113) million (2016: (146) million) derivatives, reported within trade payables, that hedge trading activities.

There were no significant changes in classification of fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities since 31 December 2016. There were also no significant movements between the fair value hierarchy classifications since 31 December 2016.

The impact in the 2017 income statement due to Level 3 instruments is a gain of 26 million (2016: gain of 94 million).

Reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements of financial assets is given below:

 

Reconciliation of movements in Level 3 valuations    € million
2017
     million
2016
 

1 January

     (106     346  

Gains and losses recognised in profit and loss

     26       94  

Gains and losses recognised in other comprehensive income

     2       (12

Purchases and new issues

     (89     (247

Sales and settlements

     (17     (187

Transfers into Level 3

     83       -  

Transfers out of Level 3

     -       (100

31 December

     (101     (106

SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS USED IN LEVEL 3 FAIR VALUES

The largest asset valued using Level 3 techniques is an executive Life Insurance of 22 million (2016: 25 million).

A change in one or more of the inputs to reasonably possible alternative assumptions would not change the value significantly.

During the year 2017, a Split-Dollar life insurance asset with a carrying value of 43 million as at 31 December 2016 (2015: 41 million) was derecognised. The asset was previously valued using Level 3 techniques and related to an unlisted investment recognised as an available for sale financial asset. The asset was disposed for a total consideration of 45 million and the carrying value at the time of disposal was 36 million. The 2017 impact on profit or loss was 9 million gain.

CALCULATION OF FAIR VALUES

The fair values of the financial assets and liabilities are defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair values are consistent with those used in the year ended 31 December 2016.

 

ASSETS AND LIABILITIES CARRIED AT FAIR VALUE

  The fair values of quoted investments falling into Level 1 are based on current bid prices.
  The fair values of unquoted available-for-sale financial assets are based on recent trades in liquid markets, observable market rates, discounted cash flow analysis and statistical modelling techniques such as the Monte Carlo simulation. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, the instrument is included in Level 2. If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in Level 3.
  Derivatives are valued using valuation techniques with market observable inputs. The models incorporate various inputs including the credit quality of counter-parties, foreign exchange spot and forward rates, interest rate curves and forward rate curves of the underlying commodities.
  For listed securities where the market is not liquid, and for unlisted securities, valuation techniques are used. These include the use of recent arm’s length transactions, reference to other instruments that are substantially the same and discounted cash flow calculations.

OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (FAIR VALUES FOR DISCLOSURE PURPOSES ONLY)

  Cash and cash equivalents, trade and other current receivables, bank loans and overdrafts, trade payables and other current liabilities have fair values that approximate to their carrying amounts due to their short-term nature.
  The fair values of preference shares and listed bonds are based on their market value.
  Non-listed bonds, other loans, bank loans and non-current receivables and payables are based on the net present value of the anticipated future cash flows associated with these instruments using rates currently available for debt on similar terms, credit risk and remaining maturities.
  Fair values for finance lease creditors have been assessed by reference to current market rates for comparable leasing arrangements.

POLICIES AND PROCESSES USED IN RELATION TO THE CALCULATION OF LEVEL 3 FAIR VALUES

Assets valued using Level 3 valuation techniques are primarily made up of long-term cash receivables and unlisted investments. Valuation techniques used are specific to the circumstances involved. Unlisted investments include 195 million (2016: 172 million) of investments within Unilever Ventures companies.