
– Weobtainedthefinalsigned
amendment to the Revolving Credit
Facility dated 29 June 2023 and
assessed the implications of the revised
terms in the context of management’s
assessment, including covenant and
liquidity compliance in the going
concern period. We considered the
changestotheunderlyingfinancial
covenants, as well as the inclusion of
monthly liquidity testing and non-
financialrequirements,includingthe
need for the company to assess the
future options available to them.
– We obtained the signed agreement with
the Pension Trustee to defer previously
agreed contributions until June 2024.
Weconfirmedthatsucheffectshad
been appropriately modelled in the
forecastcashflowassumptions.
– Weobtainedthecashflow,covenant
forecasts and sensitivities for the going
concern period prepared by
management and tested for arithmetical
accuracy of the models as well as
checking the net debt position at the
period-end date which is the starting
point for the model. Further to this, we
reviewed actual post period-end trading
against the forecast and considered all
relevant factors from the period-end
date to the approval date of the
financialstatements.Weassessedthe
reasonablenessofthecashflowforecast
by analysing management’s historical
forecasting accuracy. We also assessed
the reasonableness of the forecasts
with reference to the level of secured
orders, the prospect of securing the
pipeline and assumptions including
bothfixedandvariablecostsaswellas
assessing whether all key factors have
been considered by management.
– We evaluated the key assumptions
underpinning the Group’s assessment
by challenging the measurement and
completeness of downside scenarios
modelled by management and how
these compare with principal risks and
uncertainties of the Group. The key
sensitivity in management’s
assessment is the group’s ability to
continue operating within all of its bank
covenants and liquidity requirements
during the going concern period. We
reviewed management’s reverse stress
testingscenarioswhichquantifiedthe
downside required to breach the
covenants(bymodellingboth
decreased earnings and increased net
debt) or exhaust liquidity and evaluated
whetherthedownsideincashflows,
earnings and net debt required for such
a scenario to materialise was plausible
during the going concern period
consideringtheanalysisoffixedversus
variable costs, the proportion of
revenue secured through orderbook
coverage, and recent forecast accuracy.
– We challenged each of the available
mitigatingactions(e.g.reducedcapital
expenditure and reductions in
discretionary spend) and obtained
analysis to determine if these were in
the control of management and
evaluated the expected impact of the
mitigation in the light of our
understanding of the business and its
cost structures.
– We note that management has
performed an assessment to consider
whether any events outside of the
going concern period beyond 29 June
2024 need to be considered in the
context of management’s conclusion.
Managementhaveidentifiedthe
successfulre-financingofthe
company’s Revolving Credit Facility
which expires on 1 January 2025 and
continued covenant compliance until
then to be such events. We have
performed procedures to assess
whether management’s conclusions in
this regard are reasonable, including
review of forecasts in this period and
discussions with the company’s
advisors and the lenders in conjunction
with internal debt specialists to
determine whether the Group has
realistic prospects of covenant
complianceandarefinancingofthe
Revolving Credit Facility.
– We considered the extent to which
emerging climate-related risks may
affect the Group’s assessment and the
assumptions around the costs
anticipated in meeting the Group’s
target to become carbon neutral for its
own operations by 2030. This includes
the capital expenditure required to
enable the Group to reduce its carbon
footprint, energy usage, waste, and
reliance on plastics. Additionally, we
considered other macroeconomic
factors such as the rising cost of
materials, energy and labour which are
critical parts of the Group’s operations.
– We considered whether the Group’s
forecasts in the going concern
assessment were consistent with other
forecasts used by the Group in its
accounting estimates, including
non-current asset impairment and
deferred tax asset recognition.
– We held discussions with the Audit
Committee and full board of Directors
to corroborate the forecasts and their
basis as prepared by management.
Further to this we held discussions
with the Company’s advisors as
well as the lenders to corroborate
other key assumptions in
management’s assessment.
– We considered whether management’s
disclosuresinthefinancialstatements
sufficientlyandappropriatelyreflect
the going concern assessment, key
judgements made and outcomes.
The audit procedures performed in
evaluating the director’s assessment
were performed by the Group audit
team, however we also considered the
financialandnon-financialinformation
communicated to us from our component
teams of overseas locations as sources
of potential contrary indicators which
may cast doubt over the going concern
assessment. We determined going
concern to be a key audit matter.
Our key observations
We note the following key observations in
relation to management’s assessment
and the procedures we have performed
as stated above:
– On 29 June 2023 the Company signed
an amended agreement with the
Lenders on its Revolving Credit Facility
which includes updated covenants, a
new liquidity requirement and other
non-financialmilestonestobeactioned
including the need for the company to
assess the future options available to
them. On 28 June 2023, the Company
signed an agreement with the Pension
Trustee on the deferral of previously
agreed payments into the scheme.
Conclusion
Based on the work we have performed,
wehavenotidentifiedanymaterial
uncertainties relating to events or
conditions that, individually or collectively,
maycastsignificantdoubtonthegroup
and parent company’s ability to continue
as a going concern over the period
through to 29 June 2024, a period of
12monthsfromwhenthefinancial
statements are authorised for issue.
In relation to the group and parent
company’s reporting on how they have
applied the UK Corporate Governance
Code, we have nothing material to add or
draw attention to in relation to the
directors’statementinthefinancial
statements about whether the directors
considered it appropriate to adopt the
going concern basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities
of the directors with respect to going
concern are described in the relevant
sections of this report. However, because
not all future events or conditions can
be predicted, this statement is not a
guarantee as to the Group’s ability to
continue as a going concern.
De La Rue plc Annual Report 2023 137
Strategic report Governance report Financial statements