
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CARDIFF PROPERTY PLC
OPINION
We have audited the financial statements of The Cardiff
Property Plc (the ‘parent company’) and its subsidiaries
(the ‘group’) for the year ended 30 September 2022 which
comprise the Consolidated Income Statement, Consolidated
Statement of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Balance
Sheet, Consolidated Cash Flow Statement, Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Equity, notes to the consolidated
financial statements, including significant accounting policies,
Company Balance Sheet, Company Statement of Changes
in Equity and notes to the financial statements, including
significant accounting policies. The financial reporting
framework that has been applied in the preparation of the
Group financial statements is applicable law and UK-adopted
international accounting standards. The financial reporting
framework that has been applied in the preparation of the
Parent Company financial statements is applicable law and
United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including FRS 101
Reduced Disclosure Framework (United Kingdom Generally
Accepted Accounting Practice).
In our opinion:
• the financial statements give a true and fair view of the
state of the group’s and of the parent company’s affairs
as at 30 September 2022 and of the group’s profit for the
year then ended;
• the group financial statements have been properly
prepared in accordance with UK-adopted international
accounting standards;
• the parent company financial statements have been
properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom
Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and
• the financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
BASIS FOR OPINION
We conducted our audit in accordance with International
Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our
responsibilities under those standards are further described
in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial
statements section of our report. We are independent of the
group and parent company in accordance with the ethical
requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial
statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as
applied to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled
our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these
requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have
obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
opinion.
CONCLUSIONS RELATING TO GOING CONCERN
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that
the director’s use of the going concern basis of accounting
in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
Our evaluation of the directors’ assessment of the group’s
and parent company’s ability to continue to adopt the going
concern basis of accounting included:
a) Determining if all relevant information has been included in
the assessment of going concern including completeness
of forecast expenditure.
b) Analysing cash flow forecasts and budgets, reviewing
the underlying assumptions in relation to expenditure,
challenging management’s assumptions and inputs for
reasonableness, and checking mathematical accuracy.
c) Considering the cash position at and after the year end.
d) Reviewing the reasonable worst-case forecast scenario
prepared by management and the financial resources
available to deal with this outcome.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified
any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions
that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on
the group’s or parent company’s ability to continue as a going
concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the
financial statements are authorised for issue.
In relation to the entity’s reporting on how it has applied the
UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to
add or draw attention to in relation to the directors’ statement
in the financial statements about whether the directors
considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of
accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors
with respect to going concern are described in the relevant
sections of this report.
OUR APPLICATION OF MATERIALITY
The quantitative and qualitative thresholds for materiality
determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing
and extent of our audit procedures. The materiality for
the financial statements as a whole applied to the group
financial statements was £309,000 (2021: £294,000) based
on 1% of gross assets. We based the materiality on gross
assets because we consider this to be the most relevant
performance indicator as the group specialises in property
investment and development. The performance materiality
for the group was £216,300 (2021: £205,800) or 70% which
was determined based on the assessed risk of the group. The
Group is considered lower on the risk spectrum as historically
the records have been accurately maintained with a small
number of errors identified from audit and there are few
significant judgements or estimations outside of the property
valuations, which are determined based on an independent
management appointed expert’s report.
The materiality for the financial statements as a whole applied
to the parent company financial statements was £165,000
(2021: £137,000) based on 1% of gross assets. We based
the materiality on gross assets because we consider this to
be the most relevant performance indicator as the parent
company specialises in property investment and development.
The performance materiality for the parent company was
£115,500 (2021: £95,900) being 70% of materiality. The
31310 22 November 2022 4:38 pm v2
23
www.cardiff-property.com
THE CARDIFF PROPERTY plc
Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year ended 30 September 2022
Stock code: CDFF
Cardiff Property AR2022.indd 23Cardiff Property AR2022.indd 23 22/11/2022 16:39:3022/11/2022 16:39:30