
Auditor’s responsibilities
for the audit of the
financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial
statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s
report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level
of assurance but is not a guarantee
that an audit conducted in accordance
with ISAs (UK) will always detect a
material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud
or error and are considered material
if, individually or in the aggregate,
they could reasonably be expected
to influence the economic decisions
of users taken on the basis of these
financial statements.
The extent to which our procedures
are capable of detecting irregularities,
including fraud is detailed below.
Irregularities, including fraud, are
instances of non-compliance with laws
and regulations. We design procedures
in line with our responsibilities,
outlined above, to detect material
misstatements in respect of
irregularities, including fraud.
Based on our understanding of the
group and the parent company and
their industry, we considered that non-
compliance with the following laws
and regulations might have a material
effect on the financial statements:
compliance with the Real Estate
Investment Trust (REIT) status.
To help us identify instances of
non-compliance with these laws
and regulations, and in identifying
and assessing the risks of material
misstatement in respect to non-
compliance, our procedures included,
but were not limited to:
• Gaining an understanding of the
legal and regulatory framework
applicable to the group and the
parent company, the industry
in which they operate, and the
structure of the group, and
considering the risk of acts by the
group and the parent company
which were contrary to the
applicable laws and regulations,
including fraud;
• Inquiring of the directors,
management and, where
appropriate, those charged with
governance, as to whether the
group and the parent company
is in compliance with laws and
regulations, and discussing their
policies and procedures regarding
compliance with laws and
regulations;
• Inspecting correspondence with
relevant licensing or regulatory
authorities;
• Reviewing minutes of directors’
meetings in the year; and
• Discussing amongst the
engagement team the laws and
regulations listed above, and
remaining alert to any indications
of non-compliance.
We also considered those laws and
regulations that have a direct effect
on the preparation of the financial
statements, such as: Listing Rules, UK
Corporate Governance Code, Disclosure
Guidance and Transparency Rules, UK
Tax legislation and Companies Act 2006.
In addition, we evaluated the directors’
and management’s incentives
and opportunities for fraudulent
manipulation of the financial
statements, including the risk of
management override of controls,
and determined that the principal
risks related to: posting manual
journal entries to manipulate financial
performance, management bias
through judgements and assumptions
in significant accounting estimates,
in particular in relation to revenue
recognition (which we pinpointed to
the cut-off and accuracy), valuation of
investment property, and significant
one-off or unusual transactions.
Our procedures in relation to fraud
included but were not limited to:
• Making enquiries of the directors
and management on whether
they had knowledge of any actual,
suspected or alleged fraud;
• Gaining an understanding of the
internal controls established to
mitigate risks related to fraud;
• Discussing amongst the
engagement team the risks of fraud;
• Addressing the risks of fraud
through management override
of controls by performing journal
entry testing
The primary responsibility for
the prevention and detection of
irregularities, including fraud, rests
with both those charged with
governance and management. As with
any audit, there remained a risk of non-
detection of irregularities, as these may
involve collusion, forgery, intentional
omissions, misrepresentations or the
override of internal controls.
The risks of material misstatement that
had the greatest effect on our audit are
discussed in the “Key audit matters”
section of this report.
A further description of our
responsibilities is available on the
Financial Reporting Council’s website at
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities.
This description forms part of our
auditor’s report.
Other matters which we
are required to address
Following the recommendation of the
audit committee, we were appointed
by the members on 20 May 2021 to
audit the financial statements for the
year ending 31 December 2021 and
subsequent financial periods. The period
of total uninterrupted engagement is
five years, covering the years ending
31 December 2017 to 31 December 2021.
The non-audit services prohibited by
the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not
provided to the group or the parent
company and we remain independent
of the group and the parent company
in conducting our audit.
Our audit opinion is consistent with
our additional report to the audit
committee.
Use of the audit report
This report is made solely to the
company’s members as a body in
accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16
of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit
work has been undertaken so that we
might state to the company’s members
those matters we are required to state
to them in an auditor’s report and for
no other purpose. To the fullest extent
permitted by law, we do not accept or
assume responsibility to anyone other
than the company and the company’s
members as a body for our audit work,
for this report, or for the opinions we
have formed.
STEPHEN EAMES
(Senior Statutory Auditor)
for and on behalf of Mazars LLP
Chartered Accountants and Statutory
Auditor
The Pinnacle
160 Midsummer Boulevard
Milton Keynes MK91FF
28 March 2022
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT CONTINUED
to the members of Highcroft Investments PLC
Highcroft Investments PLC Annual report and accounts for the year ended 31 December 2021
80
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS