XML 558 R78.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.4
Provisions (including post-retirement benefits) (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2020
Disclosure of other provisions [abstract]  
Summary of Provisions including post-retirement benefits

Note
Pensions
and
post-retirement
healthcare(a)
US$m
Other
employee
entitlements(b)
US$m
Close-down
and
restoration/
environmental(c)
US$m
Other
US$m
Total
2020
US$m
Total
2019
US$m
At 1 January
2,714 354 11,090 945 15,103 13,608 
Adjustment to opening balance on transition to new accounting standard(d)
     (66)
Restated opening balance
2,714 354 11,090 945 15,103 13,542 
Adjustment on currency translation
83 34 736 37 890 65 
Adjustments to mining properties/right of use assets:14 
– increases to existing and new provisions  130 11 141 840 
– change in discount rate  816  816 — 
Charged/(credited) to profit:
– increases to existing and new provisions
200 127 562 185 1,074 850 
– change in discount rate  138 2 140 — 
– unused amounts reversed
 (19)(123)(157)(299)(100)
– exchange losses on provisions
  (21)(1)(22)
– amortisation of discount
  373 4 377 387 
Utilised in year
(192)(77)(366)(139)(774)(744)
Actuarial losses recognised in equity250    250 235 
Transfers and other movements   (31)(31)25 
At 31 December
3,055 419 13,335 856 17,665 15,103 
Balance sheet analysis:
Current
70 327 777 555 1,729 1,399 
Non-current
2,985 92 12,558 301 15,936 13,704 
Total
3,055 419 13,335 856 17,665 15,103 

Projected cash spend for the undiscounted close-down and restoration/environmental clean up provision
Undiscounted close-down and environmental restoration cash flows<1yr
US$m
1-3 yrs
US$m
3-5 yrs
US$m
> 5 yrs
US$m
Total
US$m
At 31 December 2020776 1,203 1,433 13,988 17,400 
At 31 December 2019541 955 1,100 13,470 16,066 

(a)The main assumptions used to determine the provision for pensions and post-retirement healthcare, and other information, including the expected level of future funding payments in respect of those arrangements, are given in note 42.
(b)The provision for other employee entitlements includes a provision for long service leave of US$283 million (2019: US$248 million), based on the relevant entitlements in certain Group operations and includes US$62 million (2019: US$30 million) of provision for redundancy and severance payments.
(c)The Group’s policy on close-down and restoration costs is described in note 1(l) and in paragraph (iii) under “Critical accounting policies and estimates” on page 219. Close-down and restoration costs are a normal consequence of mining, and the majority of close-down and restoration expenditure is incurred in the years following closure of the mine, refinery or smelter.
Non-current provisions for close-down and restoration/environmental expenditure include amounts relating to environmental clean-up of US$468 million (2019: US$382 million) expected to take place between one and five years from the balance sheet date, and US$937 million (2019: US$883 million) expected to take place later than five years after the balance sheet date.
Close-down and restoration/environmental liabilities at 31 December 2020 have not been adjusted for closure related receivables amounting to US$574 million (31 December 2019: US$166 million) due from the ERA trust fund, the co-owners of the Diavik Joint Venture and other financial assets held for the purposes of meeting closure obligations.
(d)Impact of the transition to new accounting pronouncement IFRS 16 “Leases” on 1 January 2019.
Schedule of Cash Spend for Undiscounted Close-Down and Environmental Restoration Obligation
Projected cash spend for the undiscounted close-down and restoration/environmental clean up provision
Undiscounted close-down and environmental restoration cash flows<1yr
US$m
1-3 yrs
US$m
3-5 yrs
US$m
> 5 yrs
US$m
Total
US$m
At 31 December 2020776 1,203 1,433 13,988 17,400 
At 31 December 2019541 955 1,100 13,470 16,066 
Schedule of Close-Down, Restoration and Environmental Provisions
Analysis of close-down and restoration/environmental clean up provisions
As at 31 December
2020
US$m

2019
US$m
Undiscounted close-down and environmental restoration obligations17,400 16,066 
Impact of discounting(4,065)(4,976)
Present closure obligation13,335 11,090 
Attributable to:
Operating sites10,736 9,255 
Non-operating sites2,599 1,835 
Total13,335 11,090 
Closure cost composition as at 31 December
2020
US$m

2019
US$m
Decommissioning, decontamination and demolition3,131 2,066 
Closure and rehabilitation earthworks (a)
4,223 3,889 
Long-term water management costs (b)
966 920 
Post closure monitoring and maintenance1,318 855 
Indirect costs, owners' costs and contingency (c)
3,697 3,360 
Total13,335 11,090 

The underlying costs for closure have been estimated with varying degrees of accuracy based on a function of the age of the underlying asset and proximity to closure. For assets within ten years of closure, closure plans and cost estimates are supported by detailed studies which are refined as the closure date approaches. These closure studies consider climate change and plan for resilience to expected climate conditions with a particular focus on precipitation rates. For new developments, consideration of climate change and ultimate closure conditions are an important part of the approval process. For longer-lived assets, closure provisions are typically based on conceptual level studies that are refreshed at least every five years; these are evolving to incorporate greater consideration of forecast climate conditions at closure.
(a)A key component of earthworks rehabilitation involves re-landscaping the area disturbed by mining activities utilising the largely diesel powered heavy mobile equipment. In developing low-carbon solutions for our mobile fleet, this may include electrification of the vehicles during the mine life. The forecast cash flows for the heavy mobile equipment in the closure cost estimate are based on existing fuel sources; these could reduce if this power is sourced from renewable energy.
(b)Long-term water management relates to the post-closure treatment of water due to acid rock drainage and other environmental commitments and is an area of research and development focus for our Closure team. The cost of this water processing can continue for many years after the bulk earthworks and demolition activities have completed and are therefore exposed to long-term climate change. This could materially affect rates of precipitation and therefore change the volume of water requiring processing. It is not currently possible to forecast accurately the impact this could have on the closure provision as some of our locations could experience drier conditions whereas others could experience greater rainfall. A further consideration relates to the alternative commercial use for the processed water which could support ultimate transfer of these costs to a third party.
(c)Indirect costs, owners' costs and contingency include adjustments to the underlying cash flows to align the closure provision with a central-case estimate. This excludes allowances for quantitative estimation uncertainties which are allocated to the underlying cost driver and presented within the respective cost categories above.
Geographic composition as at 31 December
2020
US$m

2019
US$m
Australia7,076 5,610 
USA3,819 3,377 
Canada1,482 1,267 
Rest of World958 836 
Total13,335 11,090