XML 501 R55.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.24.0.1
About the presentation of our financial statements (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2023
Disclosure of initial application of standards or interpretations [abstract]  
The basis of preparation The basis of preparation
The financial information included in the financial statements for the
year ended 31 December 2023, and for the related comparative
periods, has been prepared:
under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation
of certain financial instruments, the impact of fair value hedge
accounting on the hedged items and the accounting for post-
employment assets and obligations;
on a going concern basis, management has prepared detailed cash
flow forecasts for at least 12 months and has updated life-of-mine
plan models with longer-term cash flow projections, which 
demonstrate that we will have sufficient cash, other liquid resources
and undrawn credit facilities to enable us to meet our obligations as
they fall due;
to meet international accounting standards as issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and
interpretations issued from time to time by the IFRS Interpretations
Committee (IFRS IC), which are mandatory at 31 December 2023.
The above accounting standards and interpretations are collectively
referred to as “IFRS” in this report and contain the principles we use to
create our accounting policies. Where necessary, adjustments are
made to the locally reported assets, liabilities, and results of
subsidiaries, joint arrangements and associates to align their accounting
policies with ours for consistent reporting.
The basis of consolidation The basis of consolidation
The financial statements consolidate the accounts of Rio Tinto plc and
Rio Tinto Limited (together “the Companies”) and their respective
subsidiaries (together “the Group”, “we”, “our”) and include the Group’s
share of joint arrangements and associates.
We consolidate subsidiaries where either of the companies controls the
entity. Control exists where either of the companies has: power over the
entities, that is, existing rights that give it the current ability to direct the
relevant activities of the entities (those that significantly affect the
companies’ returns); exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its
involvement with the entities; and the ability to use its power to affect
those returns. A list of principal subsidiaries is shown in note 30.
A joint arrangement is an arrangement in which two or more parties
have joint control. Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of
control such that decisions about the relevant activities of the
arrangement (those that significantly affect the companies’ returns)
require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. We have
two types of joint arrangements: joint operations (JOs) and joint
ventures (JVs). A JO is a joint arrangement in which the parties that
share joint control have rights to the assets and obligations for the
liabilities relating to the arrangement. This includes situations where the
parties benefit from the joint activity through a share of the output,
rather than by receiving a share of the results of trading. For our JOs,
shown in note 31, we recognise: our share of assets and liabilities;
revenue from the sale of our share of the output and our share of any
revenue generated from the sale of the output by the JO; and its share
of expenses. All such amounts are measured in accordance with the
terms of the arrangement, which is usually in proportion to our interest
in the JO. These amounts are recorded in our financial statements on
the appropriate lines. A JV is a joint arrangement in which the parties
that share joint control have rights to the net assets of the arrangement.
JVs are accounted for using the equity accounting method.
An associate is an entity over which we have significant influence.
Significant influence is presumed to exist where there is neither control
nor joint control and the Group has over 20% of the voting rights, unless
it can be clearly demonstrated that this is not the case. Significant
influence can arise where we hold less than 20% of the voting rights if
we have the power to participate in the financial and operating policy
decisions affecting the entity. It also includes situations of collective
control.
We use the term “equity accounted units” (EAUs) to refer to associates
and JVs collectively. Under the equity accounting method, the
investment is recorded initially at cost to the Group, including any
goodwill on acquisition. In subsequent periods, the carrying amount of
the investment is adjusted to reflect the Group’s share of the EAUs’
retained post-acquisition profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
Our principal JVs and associates are shown in note 32.
In some cases, we participate in unincorporated arrangements and
have rights to our share of the assets and obligations for our share of
the liabilities of the arrangement rather than a right to a net return, but
we do not share joint control. In such cases, we account for these
arrangements in the same way as our joint operations, with all such
amounts measured in accordance with the terms of the arrangement,
which is usually in proportion to our interest in the arrangement.
All intragroup transactions and balances are eliminated
on consolidation.
Currency Currency
Other relevant judgements - identification of functional currency
We present our financial statements in US dollars, as that presentation currency most reliably reflects the global business performance of the
Group as a whole.
The functional currency for each subsidiary, unincorporated arrangement, joint operation and equity accounted unit is the currency of the
primary economic environment in which it operates. For businesses that reside in developed economies, the functional currency is generally
the currency of the country in which it operates because of the dominance of locally incurred costs. If the business resides in an emerging
economy, the US dollar is generally identified to be the functional currency as a higher proportion of costs, particularly imported goods and
services, are agreed and paid in US dollars, in common with other international investors. Determination of functional currency involves
judgement, and other companies may make different judgements based on similar facts.
The determination of functional currency affects the measurement of non-current assets included in the balance sheet and, as a
consequence, the depreciation and amortisation of those assets included in the income statement. It also impacts exchange gains and losses
included in the income statement and in equity. We also apply judgement in determining whether settlement of certain intragroup loans is
neither planned nor likely in the foreseeable future and, therefore, whether the associated exchange gains and losses can be taken to equity.
During 2023, A$15 billion of intragroup loans continued to meet these criteria; associated exchange gains and losses are taken to equity.
On consolidation, income statement items for each entity are translated from the functional currency into US dollars at the full-year average rate of
exchange, except for material one-off transactions, which are translated at the rate prevailing on the transaction date. Balance sheet items are
translated into US dollars at period-end exchange rates.
Exchange differences arising on the translation of the net assets of entities with functional currencies other than the US dollar are recognised
directly in the currency translation reserve. These translation differences are shown in the statement of comprehensive income, with the exception of
the translation adjustment relating to Rio Tinto Limited’s share capital, which is shown in the statement of changes in equity.
Where an intragroup balance is, in substance, part of the Group’s net investment in an entity, exchange gains and losses on that balance are taken
to the currency translation reserve.
Except as noted above, or where exchange differences are deferred as part of a cash flow hedge, all other differences are charged or credited to the
income statement in the year in which they arise.
The principal exchange rates used in the preparation of the financial statements were:
Full-year average
Year-end
One unit of local currency buys the following number of US dollars
2023
2022
2021
2023
2022
2021
Pound sterling
1.24
1.24
1.38
1.28
1.21
1.35
Australian dollar
0.66
0.69
0.75
0.69
0.68
0.73
Canadian dollar
0.74
0.77
0.80
0.76
0.74
0.78
Euro
1.08
1.05
1.18
1.11
1.07
1.13
South African rand
0.054
0.061
0.068
0.054
0.059
0.063
Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources
A Mineral Resource is a concentration or occurrence of solid material of
economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust in such form, grade (or
quality), and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual
economic extraction. An Mineral Reserve is the economically mineable
part of a measured or indicated Mineral Resource.
The estimation of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources requires
judgement to interpret available geological data and subsequently to
select an appropriate mining method and then to establish an extraction
schedule. At least annually, the Qualified Persons of the Group
(according to the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration
Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (the JORC Code)),
estimate Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources using assumptions
such as:
available geological data;
expected future commodity prices and demand;
exchange rates;
production costs;
transport costs;
close-down and restoration costs;
recovery rates;
discount rates; and
renewal of mining licences.
With regard to our future commodity price assumptions, to calculate our
Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for our filing on the Australian
Securities Exchange and London Stock Exchange, we use prices
generated by our Strategy and Economics team (refer to the Climate
change section for further details about our pricing methodology). For
this Form 20-F, we use consensus price or historical pricing and comply
with subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K (SK-1300), instead of with the
JORC code.
We use judgement as to when to include Mineral Resources in
accounting estimates, for example, the use of Mineral Resources in our
depreciation policy as described in note 13 and in the determination of
the date of closure as described in note 14.
There are many uncertainties in the estimation process and
assumptions that are valid at the time of estimation may change
significantly when new information becomes available. New geological
or economic data or unforeseen operational issues may change
estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources. This could
cause material adjustments in our financial statements to:
depreciation and amortisation rates;
carrying values of intangible assets and property, plant and
equipment;
deferred stripping costs;
provisions for close-down and restoration costs; and
recovery of deferred tax assets.
Impairment charges net of reversals Recognition and measurement
Impairment charges and reversals are assessed at the level of cash-generating units (CGUs) which, in accordance with IAS 36 “Impairment of
Assets”, are identified as the smallest identifiable asset or group of assets that generate cash inflows, which are largely independent of the cash
inflows from other assets. Separate cash-generating units are identified where an active market exists for intermediate products, even if the majority
of those products are further processed internally. In some cases, individual business units consist of several operations with independent cash-
generating streams which constitute separate CGUs.
Goodwill acquired through business combinations is allocated to the cash-generating unit or groups of cash-generating units that are expected to
benefit from the related business combination, and tested for impairment at the lowest level within the Group at which goodwill is monitored for
internal management purposes. All cash-generating units containing goodwill (note 11), indefinite-lived intangible assets and intangible assets that
are not ready for use (note 12) are tested annually for impairment as at 30 September, regardless of whether there has been an impairment trigger,
or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment charge.
Other relevant judgements - determination of CGUs
Judgement is applied to identify the Group’s CGUs, particularly when assets belong to integrated operations, and changes in CGUs could
impact impairment charges and reversals. The most relevant judgement continues to relate to the grouping of Rio Tinto Iron and Titanium
Quebec Operations and QIT Madagascar Minerals (QMM) as a single CGU on the basis that they are vertically integrated operations and
there is no active market for QMM’s ilmenite.
Property, plant and equipment, including right-of-use assets and intangible assets with finite lives are reviewed for impairment annually or more
frequently if there is an indication that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. This review starts with an appraisal of the perimeter of cash-
generating units to consider changes in the business or strategic direction. Following this, an assessment of internal and external indicators is
performed. Internal sources of information considered include assessment of the financial performance of the CGU and changes in mine plans.
External sources of information include changes in forecast commodity prices, costs and other market factors.
Non-current assets (excluding goodwill) that have suffered impairment are reviewed using the same basis for valuation as explained below
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the impairment loss may no longer exist, or may have decreased. If appropriate, an
impairment reversal will be recognised. The carrying amount of the cash-generating unit after reversal must be the lower of (a) the recoverable
amount, as calculated above, and (b) the carrying amount that would have been determined (net of amortisation or depreciation) had no impairment
loss been recognised for the cash-generating unit in prior periods.
In 2023, we identified indicators of impairment at the Gladstone alumina refineries in the Aluminium segment and indicators of impairment reversal
at the Simandou project. Refer to page 179 for details. 
Key judgement - indicators of impairment and impairment reversals
The Oyu Tolgoi and Kitimat cash-generating units have both been impaired in previous years and are therefore monitored closely for
indicators of further impairment or impairment reversal as such adjustments would likely be material to our results. At the time of their
impairment, the carrying value and fair value for these CGUs were equal, making the CGUs sensitive to changes in economic assumptions,
albeit headroom may have subsequently arisen due to the passage of time.
Oyu Tolgoi
We assessed the Oyu Tolgoi CGU for internal sources of information that could indicate impairment or impairment reversal by reference to the
operational performance of the mine and development progress for the underground operation. For external sources of information that could
indicate impairment or impairment reversal, we considered current and projected commodity prices. We concluded that there were no
indicators of impairment or impairment reversal.
Kitimat
The Kitimat smelter was impaired in 2013 and 2014 during the construction phase as cost overruns were not expected to be recovered
through economic performance. The plant was further impaired in 2021 (refer to page 180 for details) as operational performance was
adversely impacted by a workforce strike in June 2021 that has reduced the capacity over a prolonged period.
In 2023, the operational performance of the plant was considered as part of the assessment of internal sources of information for evidence of
impairment or impairment reversal. As highlighted in the climate change section, the economic performance of assets in the aluminium
segment has the potential to perform more strongly as the world transitions to a lower carbon future; however, our assessment of external
sources of information did not indicate that this had yet been priced into asset valuations. We concluded that there were no indicators of
impairment or impairment reversal.
Where indication of impairment or impairment reversal exists, an impairment review is undertaken. The recoverable amount is assessed by
reference to the higher of value in use (being the net present value of expected future cash flows of the relevant cash-generating unit in its current
condition) and fair value less costs of disposal (FVLCD). When the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is measured by reference to
FVLCD, this amount is further classified in accordance with the fair value hierarchy for observable market data that is consistent with the unit of
account for the cash-generating unit being tested. The Group considers that the best evidence of FVLCD is the value obtained from an active
market or binding sale agreement and, in this case, the recoverable amount is classified in the fair value hierarchy as level 1. When FVLCD is based
on quoted prices for equity instruments but adjusted to reflect factors such as a lack of liquidity in the market, the recoverable amount is classified as
level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. No cash-generating units are currently assessed for impairment by reference to a recoverable amount based on
FVLCD classified as level 1 or level 2.
4 Impairment charges net of reversals continued
Where unobservable inputs are material to the measurement of the recoverable amount, FVLCD is based on the best information available to reflect
the amount the Group could receive for the cash-generating unit in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
This is often estimated using discounted cash flow techniques and is classified as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Where the recoverable amount is assessed using FVLCD based on discounted cash flow techniques, the resulting estimates are based on detailed
life-of-mine and long-term production plans. These may include anticipated expansions which are at the evaluation stage of study.
The cash flow forecasts for FVLCD purposes are based on management’s best estimates of expected future revenues and costs, including the
future cash costs of production, capital expenditure, and closure, restoration and environmental costs. For the purposes of determining FVLCD from
a market participant’s perspective, the cash flows incorporate management’s price and cost assumptions in the short and medium term. In the
longer term, operating margins are assumed to remain constant where appropriate, as it is considered unlikely that a market participant would
prepare detailed forecasts over a longer term. The cash flow forecasts may include net cash flows expected to be realised from the extraction,
processing and sale of material that does not currently qualify for inclusion in mineral reserves. Such non-reserve material is only included when
there is a high degree of confidence in its economic extraction. This expectation is usually based on preliminary drilling and sampling of areas of
mineralisation that are contiguous with existing ore reserves. Typically, the additional evaluation required to achieve reserves status for such
material has not yet been done because this would involve incurring evaluation costs earlier than is required for the efficient planning and operation
of the mine.
As noted above, cost levels incorporated in the cash flow forecasts for FVLCD purposes are based on the current life-of-mine plan or long-term
production plan for the cash-generating unit. This differs from value in use which requires future cash flows to be estimated for the asset in its
current condition and therefore does not include future cash flows associated with improving or enhancing an asset’s performance. Anticipated
enhancements to assets may be included in FVLCD calculations and, therefore, generally result in a higher value.
Where the recoverable amount of a cash-generating unit is dependent on the life of its associated orebody, expected future cash flows reflect the
current life of mine and long-term production plans; these are based on detailed research, analysis and iterative modelling to optimise the level of
return from investment, output and sequence of extraction. The mine plan takes account of all relevant characteristics of the orebody, including
waste-to-ore ratios, ore grades, haul distances, chemical and metallurgical properties of the ore impacting process recoveries and capacities of
processing equipment that can be used. The life-of-mine plan and long-term production plans are, therefore, the basis for forecasting production
output and production costs in each future year.
Forecast cash flows for ore reserve estimation for JORC purposes are generally based on Rio Tinto’s commodity price forecasts, which assume
short-term market prices will revert to the Group’s assessment of the long-term price, generally over a period of three to five years. For most
commodities, these forecast commodity prices are derived from a combination of analyses of the marginal costs of the producers and the incentive
price of these commodities. These assessments often differ from current price levels and are updated periodically. The Group does not believe that
published medium- and long-term forward prices necessarily provide a good indication of future levels because they tend to be strongly influenced
by spot prices. The price forecasts used for mineral reserve estimation are generally consistent with those used for impairment testing unless
management deems that in certain economic environments a market participant would not assume Rio Tinto’s view on prices, in which case in
preparing FVLCD impairment calculations management estimates the assumptions that a market participant would be expected to use. 
Forecast future cash flows of a cash-generating unit take into account the sales prices under existing sales contracts.
The discount rates applied to the future cash flow forecasts represent an estimate of the rate the market participant would apply having regard to the
time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the future cash flow estimates have not been adjusted. The Group’s weighted
average cost of capital is generally used as a starting point for determining the discount rates, with appropriate adjustments for the risk profile of the
countries in which the individual cash-generating units operate. For final feasibility studies and mineral reserve estimation, internal hurdle rates,
which are generally higher than the Group’s weighted average cost of capital, are used. For developments funded with project finance, the debt
component of the weighted average cost of capital may be calculated by reference to the specific interest rate of the project finance and anticipated
leverage of the project.
For operations with a functional currency other than the US dollar, the impairment review is undertaken in the relevant functional currency. In
estimating FVLCD, internal forecasts of exchange rates take into account spot exchange rates, historical data and external forecasts, and are kept
constant in real terms after five years. The great majority of the Group’s sales are based on prices denominated in US dollars. To the extent that the
currencies of countries in which the Group produces commodities strengthen against the US dollar without an increase in commodity prices, cash
flows and, therefore, net present values are reduced. Management considers that, over the long term, there is a tendency for movements in
commodity prices to compensate to some extent for movements in the value of the US dollar, particularly against the Australian dollar and Canadian
dollar, and vice versa. However, such compensating changes are not synchronised and do not fully offset each other. In estimating value in use, the
present value of future cash flows in foreign currencies is translated at the spot exchange rate on the testing date.
Generally, discounted cash flow models are used to determine the recoverable amount of CGUs. In this case, significant judgement is required to
determine the appropriate estimates and assumptions used and there is significant estimation uncertainty. In particular, for fair value less costs of
disposal valuations, judgement is required to determine the estimates a market participant would use. The discounted cash flow models are most
sensitive to the following estimates: the timing of project expansions; the cost to complete assets under construction; long-term commodity prices;
production timing and recovery rates; exchange rates; operating costs; reserve and resource estimates; closure costs; discount rates; allocation of
long-term contract revenues between CGUs; and, in some instances, the renewal of mining licences. Some of these variables are unique to an
individual CGU. Future changes in these variables may differ from management’s expectations and may materially alter the recoverable amounts of
the CGUs.
Revenue by destination and product Recognition and measurement
We recognise sales revenue related to the transfer of promised goods
or services when control of the goods or services passes to the
customer. The amount of revenue recognised reflects the consideration
to which the Group is or expects to be entitled in exchange for those
goods or services.
Sales revenue is recognised on individual sales when control transfers
to the customer. In most instances, control passes and sales revenue is
recognised when the product is delivered to the vessel or vehicle on
which it will be transported once loaded, the destination port or the
customer’s premises. There may be circumstances when judgement is
required based on the five indicators of control below:
The customer has the significant risks and rewards of ownership
and has the ability to direct the use of, and obtain substantially all of
the remaining benefits from, the good or service.
The customer has a present obligation to pay in accordance with
the terms of the sales contract. For shipments under the Incoterms
cost, insurance and freight (CIF)/carriage paid to (CPT)/cost and
freight (CFR), this is generally when the ship is loaded, at which
time the obligation for payment is for both product and freight.
The customer has accepted the asset. Sales revenue may be
subject to adjustment if the product specification does not conform
to the terms specified in the sales contract but this does not impact
the passing of control. Assay and specification adjustments have
historically been immaterial.
The customer has legal title to the asset. The Group usually retains
legal title until payment is received for credit risk purposes only.
The customer has physical possession of the asset. This indicator
may be less important as the customer may obtain control of an
asset prior to obtaining physical possession, which may be the case
for goods in transit.
Revenue is principally derived from sale of commodities. We sell the
majority of our products on CFR or CIF Incoterms. This means that the
Group is responsible (acts as principal) for providing shipping services
and, in some instances, insurance after the date at which control of
goods passes to the customer at the loading port. The Group, therefore,
has separate performance obligations for freight and insurance services
that are provided solely to facilitate the sale of the products it produces.
Other Incoterms commonly used by the Group are free on board (FOB),
where the Group has no responsibility for freight or insurance once
control of the goods has passed at the loading port, and delivered at
place (DAP), where control of the goods passes when the product is
delivered to the agreed destination. For these Incoterms, there is only
one performance obligation, being the provision of product at the point
where control passes.
Within each sales contract, each unit of product shipped is a separate
performance obligation. Revenue is generally recognised at the
contracted price as this reflects the standalone selling price. Sales
revenue excludes any applicable sales taxes. Sales of copper
concentrate are stated net of the treatment and refining charges, which
will be required to convert it to an end product.
The Group’s products are sold to customers under contracts that vary in
tenure and pricing mechanisms, including some volumes sold on the
spot market. Pricing for iron ore is on a range of terms, the majority
being either monthly or quarterly average pricing mechanisms, with a
smaller proportion of iron ore volumes being sold on the spot market.
Certain of the Group’s products may be provisionally priced at the date
revenue is recognised and a provisional invoice issued; however,
substantially all iron ore and aluminium sales are reflected at final prices
in the results for the period. Provisionally priced receivables are
subsequently measured at fair value through the income statement
under IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments” as described in note 24. The final
selling price for all provisionally priced products is based on the price for
the quotational period stipulated in the contract. Final prices for copper
concentrate are normally determined between 30 and 120 days after
delivery to the customer. The change in value of the provisionally priced
receivable is based on relevant forward market prices and is included in
sales revenue. Refer to “Other revenue” within the sales by product
disclosure below.
Revenues from the sale of significant by-products, such as gold, are
included in sales revenue. Third-party commodity swap arrangements
principally for delivery and receipt of smelter-grade alumina are offset
within operating costs. The sale and purchase of third-party production
for own use or to mitigate shortfalls in our production are accounted for
on a gross basis with sales presented within revenue from contracts
with customers. Other operating income includes revenue incidental to
the main revenue-generating activities of the operations and is treated
as a credit to operating costs.
Typically, the Group has a right to payment before or at the point that
control of the goods passes, including a right, where applicable, to
payment for provisionally priced products and unperformed freight and
insurance services. Cash received before control passes is recognised as
a contract liability. The amount of consideration does not contain a
significant financing component as payment terms are less than one year.
We have a number of long-term contracts to supply products to
customers in future periods. Generally, revenue is recognised on an
invoice basis, as each unit sold is a separate performance obligation and
therefore the right to consideration from a customer corresponds directly
with our performance completed to date.
We do not disclose sales revenue from freight and insurance services
separately as we do not consider that this is necessary in order to
understand the impact of economic factors on the Group. Our Chief
Executive, the chief operating decision maker as defined under IFRS 8
“Operating Segments”, does not review information specifically relating
to these sources of revenue in order to evaluate the performance of
business segments and Group information on these sources of revenue
is not provided externally.
Exploration and evaluation expenditure 8 Exploration and evaluation expenditure
Exploration and evaluation expenditure includes costs that are directly attributable to:
researching and analysing existing exploration data;
conducting geological studies, exploratory drilling and sampling;
examining and testing extraction and treatment methods;
compiling various studies (order of magnitude, pre-feasibility and feasibility) and/or
early works at mine sites prior to full notice to proceed.
Exploration expenditure relates to the initial search for deposits with economic potential. Expenditure on exploration activity undertaken by the
Group is not capitalised.
Evaluation expenditure relates to a detailed assessment of deposits or other projects (including smelter and refinery projects) that have been
identified as having economic potential. These costs are also expensed until the business case for the project is sufficiently advanced. For
greenfield projects, expensing typically continues to a later phase of study compared with brownfield expansions.
Taxation
Recognition and measurement
The taxation charge contains both current and deferred tax.
Current tax is the tax expected to be payable on the taxable income for the year calculated using rates applicable during the year. It includes
adjustments for tax expected to be payable or recoverable in respect of previous periods. Where the amount of tax payable or recoverable is
uncertain, we establish provisions based on either: the Group’s judgement of the most likely amount of the liability or recovery; or, when there is a
wide range of possible outcomes, a probability weighted average approach.
Deferred tax is calculated in accordance with IAS 12 using rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Where
the recognition of an asset and liability from a single transaction gives rise to equal and off-setting temporary differences, we had previously applied
the Initial Recognition Exemption allowed by IAS 12, and consequently recognised neither a deferred tax asset nor a deferred tax liability in respect
of these timing differences. Under the narrow-scope amendments to IAS 12, deferred tax assets and liabilities are required to be recognised in
respect of such temporary differences and prior year results have been restated accordingly (refer to section “New standards issued and effective in
the current year” on page 166 for details). Primarily, this applies to lease arrangements and changes in closure estimates which are capitalised.
Goodwill and Intangible assets Recognition and measurement
Goodwill is not amortised; it is tested annually at 30 September for impairment or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate a
potential impairment. Refer to note 4 for further information.
Recognition and measurement
Purchased intangible assets are initially recorded at cost. Finite-life intangible assets are amortised over their useful economic lives on a straight line
or units of production basis, as appropriate. Intangible assets that are deemed to have indefinite lives and intangible assets that are not yet ready for
use are not amortised; they are reviewed annually for impairment or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential
impairment.
The majority of our intangible assets relate to capitalised exploration and evaluation spend on undeveloped properties and contract-based water
rights. The water rights were acquired with Alcan in Canada.
The carrying values for undeveloped properties are reviewed at each reporting date in accordance with IFRS 6 “Exploration for and Evaluation of
Mineral Resources”. The indicators of impairment differ from the tests in accordance with IAS 36 in recognition of the subjectivity of estimating future
cash flows for mineral interests under evaluation. Potential indicators of impairment include: expiry of the right to explore, substantive expenditure is
no longer planned, commercially viable quantities of mineral resources have not been discovered and exploration activities will be discontinued, or
sufficient data exists to indicate a future development would be unlikely to recover the carrying amount in full. When such impairment indicators
have been identified, the recoverable amount and impairment charge are measured under IAS 36. Impairment reversals for undeveloped properties
are not subject to special conditions within IFRS 6 and are therefore subject to the same monitoring for indicators of impairment reversal as other
CGUs.
Exploration and evaluation
Evaluation expenditure relates to a detailed assessment of deposits or other projects (including smelter and refinery projects) that have been
identified as having economic potential. Capitalisation of evaluation expenditure commences when there is a high degree of confidence that the
Group will determine that a project is commercially viable; that is, the project will provide a satisfactory return relative to its perceived risks and,
therefore, it is considered probable that future economic benefits will flow to the Group. The Group’s view is that a high degree of confidence is
greater than “more likely than not” (that is, greater than 50% certainty) and less than “virtually certain” (that is, less than 90% certainty).
Assessing whether there is a high degree of confidence that the Group will ultimately determine that an evaluation project is commercially viable
requires judgement and consideration of all relevant factors such as: the nature and objective of the project; the project’s current stage, project
timeline, current estimates of the project’s net present value (including sensitivity analyses for the key assumptions), and the main risks of the
project. Development expenditure incurred prior to the decision to proceed is subject to the same criteria for capitalisation, being a high degree of
confidence that the Group will ultimately determine that a project is commercially viable.
In some cases, undeveloped projects are regarded as successors to ore bodies, smelters or refineries currently in production. Where this is the
case, it is intended that these will be developed and go into production when the current source of ore is exhausted or when existing smelters or
refineries are closed. Mineral reserves may be declared for an undeveloped mining project before its commercial viability has been fully determined.
Evaluation costs may continue to be capitalised in between declaration of mineral reserves and approval to mine as further work is undertaken in
order to refine the development case to maximise the project’s returns.
Carbon credits and Renewable Energy Certificates
Carbon credits and Renewable Energy Certificate (RECs) acquired for our own use are accounted for as intangible assets, initially recorded at cost.
They are amortised through the income statement when surrendered.
Contract-based intangible assets
The majority of the carrying value of our contract-based intangible assets relate to water rights in the Quebec region. These contribute to the
efficiency and cost effectiveness of our aluminium operations as they enable us to generate electricity from hydropower stations.
Property, plant and equipment Recognition and measurement
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost, as defined in IAS 16 “Property, Plant and Equipment”, less accumulated depreciation and
accumulated impairment losses. The cost of property, plant and equipment includes, where applicable, the estimated close-down and restoration
costs associated with the asset.
Property, plant and equipment includes right-of-use assets arising from leasing arrangements, shown separately from owned and leasehold assets.
Once an undeveloped mining project has been determined as commercially viable and approval to mine has been given, further expenditure is
capitalised under “capital work in progress” together with any amount transferred from “Exploration and evaluation”. Once the project enters into an
operation phase, the amounts capitalised in capital work in progress are reclassified to their respective asset categories.
Costs incurred while commissioning new assets, in the period before they are capable of operating in the manner intended by management, are
capitalised unless associated with pre-production revenue. Development costs incurred after the commencement of production are capitalised to the
extent they are expected to give rise to a future economic benefit. Interest on borrowings related to construction or development projects is
capitalised, at the rate payable on project-specific debt if applicable or at the Group or subsidiary’s cost of borrowing if not. This is performed until
the point when substantially all the activities that are necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use are complete. It may be appropriate to
use a subsidiary’s cost of borrowing when the debt was negotiated based on the financing requirements of that subsidiary.
Depreciation of non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment is depreciated over its useful life, or over the remaining life of the mine, smelter or refinery if that is shorter and there
is no reasonable alternative use for the asset by the Group. Depreciation commences when an asset is available for use and therefore there is no
depreciation for capital work in progress.
Straight line basis
Assets within operations for which production is not expected to fluctuate significantly from one year to another or which have a physical life shorter
than the related mine are depreciated on a straight line basis as follows:
Type of Property, plant and equipment
Land and buildings
Plant and equipment
Land
Buildings
Power-generating assets
Other plant and equipment
Depreciation profile
Not depreciated
5 to 50 years
See Power note below
on page 195
3 to 50 years
The useful lives and residual values for material assets and categories of assets are reviewed annually and changes are reflected prospectively.
Units of production basis
For mining properties and leases and certain mining equipment, consumption of the economic benefits of the asset is linked to production. Except
as noted below, these assets are depreciated on the units of production basis.
In applying the units of production method, depreciation is normally calculated based on production in the period as a percentage of total expected
production in current and future periods based on mineral reserves and, for some mines, other mineral resources. Other mineral resources may be
included in the calculations of total expected production in limited circumstances where there are very large areas of contiguous mineralisation, for
which the economic viability is not sensitive to likely variations in grade, as may be the case for certain iron ore, bauxite and industrial mineral
deposits, and where there is a high degree of confidence that the other mineral resources can be extracted economically. This would be the case
when the other mineral resources do not yet have the status of ore reserves merely because the necessary detailed evaluation work has not yet
been performed and the responsible technical personnel agree that inclusion of a proportion of measured and indicated resources in the calculation
of total expected production is appropriate based on historical reserve conversion rates. 
The required level of confidence is unlikely to exist for minerals that are typically found in low-grade ore (as compared with the above), such as
copper or gold. In these cases, specific areas of mineralisation have to be evaluated in detail before their economic status can be predicted with
confidence.
Sometimes the calculation of depreciation for infrastructure assets, primarily rail and port, considers measured and indicated resources. This is
because the asset can benefit current and future mines. The measured and indicated resource may relate to mines which are currently in production
or to mines where there is a high degree of confidence that they will be brought into production in the future. The quantum of mineral resources is
determined taking into account future capital costs as required by the JORC code. The depreciation calculation, however, applies to current mines
only and does not take into account future development costs for mines which are not yet in production. Measured and indicated resources are
currently incorporated into depreciation calculations in the Group’s Australian iron ore business.
13 Property, plant and equipment continued
Key judgement - estimation of asset lives
The useful lives of the major assets of a cash-generating unit are often dependent on the life of the orebody to which they relate. Where this is
the case, the lives of mining properties, and their associated refineries, concentrators and other long-lived processing equipment are generally
limited to the expected life of the orebody. The life of the orebody, in turn, is estimated on the basis of the life-of-mine plan. Where the major
assets of a cash-generating unit are not dependent on the life of a related orebody, management applies judgement in estimating the
remaining service potential of long-lived assets. Factors affecting the remaining service potential of smelters include, for example, smelter
technology and electricity purchase contracts when power is not sourced from the Group, or in some cases from local governments permitting
electricity generation from hydropower stations.
Impact of climate change on our business - estimation of asset lives
We expect there to be a higher demand for copper, aluminium, lithium and high-grade iron ore in order to meet demand for the minerals
required to transition to a low carbon economic environment, consistent with the climate change commitments of the Paris Agreement. We
expect this to exceed new supply to the market and therefore increase prices. Under the Aspirational Leadership scenario, the economic cut-
off grade for our Mineral Reserves is expected to be lower; in effect we would mine a greater volume of material before the mines are
depleted. We cannot quantify the difference this would make without undue cost as it would require revised mine plans, but for property, plant
and equipment this increased volume of material would reduce the depreciation charge during any given period for assets that use the “Units
of production” depreciation basis.
Deferred stripping Deferred stripping
In open pit mining operations, overburden and other waste materials must be removed to access ore from which minerals can be extracted
economically. The process of removing overburden and other waste materials is referred to as stripping. During the development of a mine (or, in
some instances, pit; see below), before production commences, stripping costs related to a component of an orebody are capitalised as part of the
cost of construction of the mine (or pit). These are then amortised over the life of the mine (or pit) on a units of production basis.
Where a mine operates several open pits that are regarded as separate operations for the purpose of mine planning, initial stripping costs are
accounted for separately by reference to the ore from each separate pit. If, however, the pits are highly integrated for the purpose of mine planning,
the second and subsequent pits are regarded as extensions of the first pit in accounting for stripping costs. In such cases, the initial stripping of the
second and subsequent pits is considered to be production phase stripping (see below).
Key judgement - deferral of stripping costs
We apply judgement as to whether multiple pits at a mine are considered separate or integrated operations. This determines whether the
stripping activities of a pit are classified as pre-production or production phase stripping and, therefore, the amortisation base for those costs.
The analysis depends on each mine’s specific circumstances and requires judgement: another mining company could make a different
judgement even when the fact pattern appears to be similar.
The following factors would point towards the initial stripping costs for the individual pits being accounted for separately:
if mining of the second and subsequent pits is conducted consecutively following that of the first pit, rather than concurrently;
if separate investment decisions are made to develop each pit, rather than a single investment decision being made at the outset;
if the pits are operated as separate units in terms of mine planning and the sequencing of overburden removal and ore mining, rather than
as an integrated unit;
if expenditures for additional infrastructure to support the second and subsequent pits are relatively large; and
if the pits extract ore from separate and distinct orebodies, rather than from a single orebody.
If the designs of the second and subsequent pits are significantly influenced by opportunities to optimise output from several pits combined,
including the co-treatment or blending of the output from the pits, then this would point to treatment as an integrated operation for the
purposes of accounting for initial stripping costs. The relative importance of each of the above factors is considered in each case.
In order for production phase stripping costs to qualify for capitalisation as a stripping activity asset, three criteria must be met:
it must be probable that there will be an economic benefit in a future accounting period because the stripping activity has improved access
to the orebody;
it must be possible to identify the “component” of the orebody for which access has been improved; and
it must be possible to reliably measure the costs that relate to the stripping activity.
A “component” is a specific section of the orebody that is made more accessible by the stripping activity. It will typically be a subset of the
larger orebody that is distinguished by a separate useful economic life (for example, a pushback).
Recognition and measurement of deferred stripping
Phase
Development Phase
Production Phase
Stripping activity
Overburden and other waste removal during
the development of a mine before production
commences.
Production phase stripping can give access to two benefits: the extraction of ore in the
current period and improved access to ore which will be extracted in future periods.
Period of benefit
After commissioning of the mine.
Future periods after first phase is complete.
Current and future benefit are
indistinguishable.
Capitalised to mining
properties and leases in
property, plant and
equipment
During the development of a mine, stripping
costs relating to a component of an orebody
are capitalised as part of the cost of
construction of the mine.
It may be the case that subsequent phases
of stripping will access additional ore and
that these subsequent phases are only
possible after the first phase has taken
place. Where applicable, the Group
considers this on a mine-by-mine basis.
Generally, the only ore attributed to the
stripping activity asset for the purposes of
calculating the life-of-component ratio is the
ore to be extracted from the originally
identified component.
Stripping costs for the component are
deferred to the extent that the current period
ratio exceeds the life-of-component ratio.
Allocation to inventory
Not applicable
Not applicable
The stripping cost is allocated to inventory
based on a relevant production measure
using a life-of-component strip ratio. The
ratio divides the tonnage of waste mined for
the component for the period either by the
quantity of ore mined for the component or
by the quantity of minerals contained in the
ore mined for the component. In some
operations, the quantity of ore is a more
appropriate basis for allocating costs,
particularly when there are significant by-
products.
Component
A “component” is a specific section of the orebody that is made more accessible by the stripping activity. It will typically be a subset of the
larger orebody that is distinguished by a separate useful economic life (for example, a pushback).
Life-of-component ratio
The life-of-component ratios are based on the mineral reserves of the mine (and for some mines, other mineral resources) and the annual
mine plan; they are a function of the mine design and, therefore, changes to that design will generally result in changes to the ratios.
Changes in other technical or economic parameters that impact the mineral reserves (and for some mines, other mineral resources) may
also have an impact on the life-of-component ratios even if they do not affect the mine design. Changes to the ratios are accounted for
prospectively.
Depreciation basis
Depreciated on a “units of production” basis based on expected production of either ore or minerals contained in the ore over the life of the
component unless another method is more appropriate.
Close-down and restoration provisions Recognition and measurement
The Group has provisions for close-down and restoration costs, which
include the dismantling and demolition of infrastructure, the removal of
residual materials and the remediation of disturbed areas for mines and
certain refineries and smelters. The obligation may occur during
development or during the production phase of a facility. These
provisions are based on all regulatory requirements and any other
commitments made to stakeholders. The provision excludes the impact
of future disturbance that is planned to occur during the life of mine, so
that it represents only existing disturbance as at the balance sheet date.
Closure provisions are not made for those operations that have no
known restrictions on their lives as the closure dates cannot be reliably
estimated; instead a contingent liability is disclosed. Refer to note 37 for
details. This applies primarily to certain Canadian smelters that have
indefinite-lived water rights from local governments permitting electricity
generation from hydropower stations and are not tied to a specific
orebody.
Close-down and restoration costs are a normal consequence of mining
or production, and the majority of close-down and restoration
expenditure is incurred in the years following closure of the mine,
refinery or smelter. Although the ultimate cost to be incurred is
uncertain, the Group’s businesses estimate their costs using current
restoration standards, techniques and expected climate conditions. The
costs are estimated on the basis of a closure plan, and are reviewed at
each reporting period during the life of the operation to reflect known
developments. The estimates are also subject to formal review, with
appropriate external support, at regular intervals.
The timing of closure and the rehabilitation plans for the site can be
uncertain and dependent upon future capital allocation decisions, which
involve estimation of future economic circumstances and business
cases. In such circumstances, the closure provision is estimated using
probability weighting of the different remediation and closure scenarios.
The initial close-down and restoration provision is capitalised within
“Property, plant and equipment”. Subsequent movements in the close-
down and restoration provisions for ongoing operations are treated as
an adjustment to cost within “Property, plant and equipment”. This
includes those resulting from new disturbances related to expansions or
other activities qualifying for capitalisation; updated cost estimates;
changes to the estimated lives of operations; changes to the timing of
closure activities; and revisions to discount rates.
Changes in closure provisions relating to closed and fully impaired
operations are charged/credited to “Net operating costs” in the income
statement.
Where rehabilitation is conducted systematically over the life of the
operation, rather than at the time of closure, provision is made for the
estimated outstanding continuous rehabilitation work at each balance
sheet date and the cost is charged to the income statement.
The closure provision is represented by forecast future underlying cash
flows expressed in real terms at the balance sheet date. These are
discounted for the time value of money based on a long-term view of
low-risk market yields which includes a review of historic trends plus
risks and opportunities for which future cash flows have not been
adjusted, namely potential improvements in closure practices between
the reporting date and the point at which rehabilitation spend takes
place. The real-terms discount rate used is 2.0% (2022: 1.5%) which is
applied to all locations since we expect to meet closure cash flows
principally from US dollar revenues and financing, with activities co-
ordinated by the Group's central closure team.
To roll forward those real-terms cash flows between periods, we identify
local rates of inflation based on Producer Price Inflation (PPI) indices
and, together with the real-terms discount rate, unwind the discount
through the line “Amortisation of discount on provisions”, shown within
“Finance items” in the income statement. This nominal rate for cost
escalation in the current financial year is estimated at the start of each
half-year and applied systematically for six months. At the end of each
half-year we update the underlying cash flows for the latest estimate of
experienced inflation, if it differs materially from our forecast, for the
current financial year and record this as “changes to existing
provisions”. For operating sites this adjustment usually results in a
corresponding adjustment to property, plant and equipment and for
closed and fully impaired sites the adjustment is charged or credited to
the income statement.
In some cases, our subsidiaries make a contribution to trust funds in
order to meet or reimburse future environmental and decommissioning
costs. Amounts due for reimbursement from trust funds are not offset
against the corresponding closure provision unless payments into the
fund have the effect of passing the closure obligation to the trust.
Environmental costs result from environmental damage that was not a
necessary consequence of operations, and may include remediation,
compensation and penalties. Provision is made for the estimated
present value of such costs at the balance sheet date. These costs are
charged to “Net operating costs”, except for the unwinding of the
discount which is shown within “Amortisation of discount on provisions”.
Remediation procedures may commence soon after the time the
disturbance, remediation process and estimated remediation costs
become known, but can continue for many years depending on the
nature of the disturbance and the remediation techniques used.
Inventories Recognition and measurement
Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value, primarily on a weighted average cost basis. Third-party production purchased
for our own use that is ordinarily interchangeable in accordance with IAS 2 “Inventories” is valued on the same basis, jointly with our own production.
Average costs are calculated by reference to the cost levels experienced in the relevant month together with those in opening inventory.
The cost of raw materials and purchased components, and consumable stores, is the purchase price. The cost of work in progress and finished
goods and goods for resale is generally the cost of production, including directly attributable labour costs, materials and contractor expenses, the
depreciation of assets used in production and production overheads. 
Work in progress includes ore stockpiles and other partly processed material. Stockpiles represent ore that has been extracted and is available for
further processing. If there is significant uncertainty as to if and when the stockpiled ore will be processed, the cost of such ore is expensed as
mined. If the ore will not be processed within 12 months after the balance sheet date, it is included within non-current assets and net realisable value
is calculated on a discounted cash flow basis. Quantities of stockpiled ore are assessed primarily through surveys and assays. Certain estimates,
including expected metal recoveries, are calculated using available industry, engineering and scientific data, and are periodically reassessed, taking
into account technical analysis and historical performance.
Leases Recognition and measurement
IFRS 16 applies to the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases. Certain leases are exempt from the standard, including
leases to explore for or use minerals, oil, natural gas and similar non-regenerative resources. We apply the scope exemptions in paragraphs 3(e)
and 4 of IFRS 16 and do not apply IFRS 16 to leases of any assets which would otherwise fall within the scope of IAS “38 Intangible Assets”.
A significant proportion of our lease arrangements relate to dry bulk vessels and office properties. Other leases include land and non-mining rights,
warehouses, ports, equipment and vehicles. 
We recognise all lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use assets on the balance sheet, with the exception of short-term (12 months or fewer)
and low-value leases, where payments are expensed as incurred. Lease liabilities are recorded at the present value of fixed payments; variable
lease payments that depend on an index or rate; amounts payable under residual value guarantees; and extension options expected to be
exercised. Where a lease contains an extension option that we can exercise without negotiation, lease payments for the extension period are
included in the liability if we are reasonably certain that we will exercise the option. Variable lease payments not dependent on an index or rate are
excluded from the calculation of lease liabilities at initial recognition. Payments are discounted at the incremental borrowing rate of the lessee,
unless the interest rate implicit in the lease can be readily determined. For lease agreements relating to vessels, ports and properties, non-lease
components are excluded from the projection of future lease payments and recorded separately within operating costs as services are being
provided. The lease liability is measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. The right-of-use asset arising from a lease
arrangement at initial recognition reflects the lease liability, initial direct costs, lease payments made before the commencement date of the lease,
and capitalised provision for dismantling and restoration of the underlying asset, less any lease incentives.
We recognise depreciation on right-of-use assets and interest on lease liabilities in the income statement over the lease term. Repayments of lease
liabilities are separated into a principal portion (presented within financing activities) and an interest portion (which the Group presents in operating
activities) in the cash flow statement. Payments made before the commencement date are included within financing activities unless they in
substance represent investing cash flows, for example where pre-commencement cash flows are significant relative to aggregate cash flows of the
leasing arrangement.
Other relevant judgements - lease assessment
We have to apply judgement for certain contractual arrangements, such as renewable energy power purchase agreements (PPAs), in
evaluating whether we have the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from the use of the renewable energy assets,
including the right to obtain physical energy these assets generate. Based on our evaluation, we determine whether an arrangement is a
lease, an executory contract or a derivative. An immaterial amount was recognised as a lease at year end for a fixed component of the QMM
renewable PPA. Amrun PPA is a lease, which has not yet commenced and is included in capital commitments (note 37).
Cash and cash equivalents Recognition and measurement
For the purpose of the balance sheet, cash and cash equivalents covers cash on hand, deposits held with banks, and short-term, highly liquid
investments (mainly money market funds and reverse repurchase agreements) that are readily convertible into known amounts of cash and which
are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value. Bank overdrafts are shown as current liabilities on the balance sheet. For the purposes of the
cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents are shown net of overdrafts.
Financial instruments and risk management Recognition and measurement
We classify our financial assets into those held at amortised cost and those to be measured at fair value either through the profit and loss (FVTPL)
or through other comprehensive income (FVOCI) based on the business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual terms of the
cash flows.
Classification of
financial asset
Amortised cost
Fair value through profit and
loss
Fair value through other comprehensive income
Recognition and
initial measurement
At initial recognition, trade receivables that
do not have a significant financing
component are recognised at their
transaction price. Other financial assets are
initially recognised at fair value plus related
transaction costs.
The asset is initially recognised at
fair value with transaction costs
immediately expensed to the
income statement.
The asset is initially recognised at fair value. 
Subsequent
measurement
Amortised cost using the effective interest
method.
Fair value movements are
recognised in the income
statement.
Fair value gains or losses on revaluation of such equity
investments, including any foreign exchange component, are
recognised in other comprehensive income. Dividends are
recognised in the income statement when the right to receive
payment is established.
Derecognition
Any gain or loss on derecognition or
modification of a financial asset held at
amortised cost is recognised in the income
statement.
Not applicable.
When the equity investment is derecognised, there is no
recycling of fair value gains or losses previously recognised in
other comprehensive income to the income statement.
Borrowings and other financial liabilities (including trade payables but excluding derivative liabilities) are recognised initially at fair value, net of
transaction costs incurred, and are subsequently measured at amortised cost.
24 Financial instruments and risk management continued
Financial risk management objectives
Our financial risk management objectives are:
to have in place a robust capital structure to manage the organisation through the commodity cycle
to allow our financial exposures, mainly commodity price, foreign exchange and interest rates to, in general, float with the market.
Our Treasury and Commercial teams manage the following key economic risks generated from our operations:
capital and liquidity risk
credit risk
interest rate risk
commodity price risk
foreign exchange risk.
These teams operate under a strong control environment, within approved limits.
(i) Capital and liquidity risk
Our capital and liquidity risk arises from the possibility that we may not be able to settle or meet our obligations as they fall due. Refer to our capital
and liquidity section on page 204.
(ii) Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that our customers, or institutions that we hold investments with, are unable to meet their contractual obligations. We are
exposed to credit risk in our operating activities (primarily from customer trade receivables); and from our investing activities that include government
securities (primarily US Government), corporate and asset-backed securities, reverse re-purchase agreements, money market funds, and balances
with banks and financial institutions. Refer to note 17, note 22 and note 23 for an understanding of the size of, and the credit risk related to, each
balance.
(iii) Interest rate risk
Our interest rate management policy is generally to borrow and invest at floating interest rates. However, we may elect to maintain a proportion of
fixed-rate funding after considering market conditions, the cost and form of funding and other related factors. After the impact of hedging, 68%
(2022: 77%) of our borrowings (including leases) were at floating rates. To understand how we manage interest rate risk, refer to note 20.
Share-based payments The Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited share-based incentive plans are
as follows.
UK Share Plan
The fair values of Matching and Free Share awards are the market
value of the shares on the date of purchase. The awards are settled in
equity.
Equity Incentive Plan
Since 2018, all long-term incentive awards have been granted under the
2018 Equity Incentive Plan which allows for awards in the form of
Performance Share Awards (PSA), Management Share Awards (MSA)
and Bonus Deferral Awards (BDA) to be granted. In general, these
awards will be settled in equity, including the dividends accumulated
from date of award to vesting and therefore the awards are accounted
for in accordance with the requirements applying to equity-settled
share-based payment transactions.
Performance Share Awards
Participants are generally assigned shares in settlement of their PSA on
vesting. Therefore the awards are accounted for in accordance with the
requirements applying to equity-settled share-based payment
transactions, including the dividends accumulated from date of award to
vesting.
The awards are subject to Total Shareholder Return (TSR) performance
conditions. The fair value of the awards is calculated using a Monte
Carlo simulation model taking into account the TSR performance
conditions. Forfeitures prior to vesting are assumed at 5% per annum of
outstanding awards (2022: 5% per annum).
Management Share Awards
The vesting of these awards is dependent on service conditions being
met; no performance conditions apply.
The fair value of each award on the day of grant is based on the share
price on the day of grant. Forfeitures prior to vesting are assumed at 7%
per annum of outstanding awards (2022: 7% per annum).
Bonus Deferral Awards
Bonus Deferral Awards provide for the mandatory deferral of 50% of the
bonuses for Executive Directors and Executive Committee members.
The vesting of these awards is dependent only on service conditions
being met. The fair value of each award on the day of grant is based on
the share price on the day of grant. Forfeitures prior to vesting are
assumed at 3% per annum of outstanding awards (2022: 3% per
annum).
Global Employee Share Plans
The Global Employee Share Plans were introduced in 2012 and re-
approved by shareholders in 2021. Under these plans, the companies
provide a Matching share award for each Investment share purchased
by a participant. The vesting of Matching awards is dependent on
service conditions being met and the continued holding of Investment
shares by the participant until vesting. These awards are settled in
equity including the dividends accumulated from date of award to
vesting. The fair value of each Matching share on the day of grant is
equal to the share price on the date of purchase less a deduction of
15% (5% per annum) for estimated cancellations (caused by employees
withdrawing their Investment shares prior to vesting) in addition to a
deduction for forfeitures prior to vesting which are assumed at 5% per
annum of outstanding awards (2022: 5% per annum).
The PSA, MSA, BDA and awards under the Global Employee Share
Plans and UK Share Plan together represent 100% (2022: 100%) of the
total IFRS 2 “Share-based Payment” charge for Rio Tinto plc and Rio
Tinto Limited plans in 2023.
Recognition and measurement
These plans are accounted for in accordance with the fair value
recognition provisions of IFRS 2.
The fair value of the Group’s share plans is recognised as an expense
over the expected vesting period with an offset to retained earnings for
Rio Tinto plc plans and to other reserves for Rio Tinto Limited plans.
The Group uses fair values provided by independent actuaries
calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation model.
The terms of each plan are considered at the balance sheet date to
determine whether the plan should be accounted for as equity-settled or
cash-settled. The Group does not operate any material plans as cash-
settled although certain awards can be settled in cash at the discretion
of the directors or where settling awards in equity is challenging or
prohibited by local laws and regulations. The value of these awards is
immaterial.
Post-retirement benefits Description of plans
The Group operates a number of pension and post-retirement healthcare plans which provide lump sums, pensions, medical benefits and life
insurance to retirees. Some of these plans are defined contribution and some are defined benefit, with assets held in separate trusts, foundations
and similar entities.
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement healthcare plans expose the Group to a number of risks.
Uncertainty in benefit
payments
The value of the Group’s liabilities for post-retirement benefits will ultimately depend on the amount of benefits paid out.
This in turn will depend on the level of future pay increases, the level of inflation (for those benefits that are subject to some form of
inflation protection) and how long individuals live.
Volatility in asset values
The Group is exposed to future movements in the values of assets held in pension plans to meet future benefit payments.
Uncertainty in cash funding
Movements in the values of the obligations or assets may result in the Group being required to provide higher levels of cash funding,
although changes in the level of cash required can often be spread over a number of years. In some countries control over the rate
of cash funding or over the investment policy for pension assets might rest to some extent with a trustee body or other body that is
not under the Group’s direct control. In addition the Group is also exposed to adverse changes in pension regulation.
For these reasons, the Group has a policy of moving away from defined benefit pension provisions and towards defined contribution arrangements.
The defined benefit pension plans for non-unionised employees are closed to new entrants in all countries. For unionised employees, some plans
remain open.
The Group does not usually participate in multi-employer plans in which the risks are shared with other companies using those plans. The Group’s
participation in such plans is immaterial and therefore no detailed disclosures are provided in this note.
Pension plans
The majority of the Group’s defined benefit pension obligations are in Canada, the UK, the US and Switzerland. In Australia the main arrangements
are principally defined contribution in nature, but there are sections providing defined benefits linked to final pay. The features of the Group’s defined
benefit pension obligations are summarised as follows.
Calculation of benefit
Regulatory requirements
Governing body
Canada
Linked to final average pay for non-
unionised employees. For unionised
employees linked to final average pay or to
a flat monetary amount per year of service.
Regulatory requirements in the relevant
provinces and territories (predominantly
Quebec).
Pension committee, a number of members are appointed by
the sponsor and a number appointed by plan participants. In
some cases, independent committee members are also
appointed.
UK
Linked to final pay, subject to an earnings
cap.
Regulatory requirements that apply to UK
pension plans.
Trustee board, a number of directors appointed by the
sponsor and a number appointed by plan participants and an
independent trustee director.
US
Linked to final average pay for non-
unionised employees and to a flat
monetary amount per year of service for
unionised employees.
US regulations.
Benefit Governance Committee. Members are appointed by
the sponsor.
Switzerland
Linked to final average pay.
Swiss regulations.
Trustee board. Members are appointed by the plan sponsor,
by employees and by retirees.
Australia
Linked to final pay and typically paid in
lump sum form.
Local regulations in Australia.
An independent financial institution. One third of the board
positions are nominated by employers. Remaining positions
are filled by independent directors and directors nominated by
participants.
The Group also operates a number of unfunded defined benefit plans, which are included in the reported defined benefit obligations.
Post-retirement healthcare plans
Certain subsidiaries of the Group, mainly in the US and Canada, provide healthcare and life insurance benefits to retired employees and in some
cases to their beneficiaries and covered dependants. Eligibility for coverage is dependent upon certain age and service criteria. These arrangements
are unfunded, and are included in the reported defined benefit obligations.
Recognition and measurement
For post-employment defined benefit schemes, in accordance with IAS 19 “Employee Benefits”, local actuaries calculate the fair value of the plan
assets and the present value of the plan obligations using a variety of valuation techniques dependent on the type of asset or liability. The difference
is recognised as an asset or liability in the balance sheet.
Where appropriate, the recognition of assets may be restricted to the present value of any amounts the Group expects to recover by way of refunds
from the plan or reductions in future contributions. In determining the extent to which a refund will be available the Group considers whether any
third party, such as a trustee or pension committee, has the power to enhance benefits or to wind up a pension plan without the Group’s consent.
The current service cost, any past service cost and the effect of any curtailment or settlements and the interest cost less interest income on assets
held in the plans are recognised in the income statement. Actuarial gains/(losses) and returns from assets are recognised in other comprehensive
income.
The Group’s contributions to defined contribution plans are charged to the income statement in the period to which the contributions relate.
All amounts charged to the income statement in respect of these plans are included within “Net operating costs” or in “Share of profit after tax of
equity accounted units”, as appropriate.
Plan assets
The assets of the pension plans are invested predominantly in a diversified range of bonds, equities, property and qualifying insurance policies.
Consequently, the funding level of the pension plans is affected by movements in interest rates and also in the level of equity markets. The Group
monitors its exposure to changes in interest rates and equity markets and also measures its balance sheet pension risk using a value at risk
approach. These measures are considered when deciding whether significant changes in investment strategy are required.
Investment strategy reviews are conducted on a periodic basis to determine the optimal investment mix. This is performed while bearing in mind the
risk tolerance of the Group and local sponsor companies, and the views of the Pension Committees and trustee boards who are legally responsible
for the plans’ investments. The assets of the pension plans may also be invested in qualifying insurance policies which provide a stream of
payments to match the benefits being paid out by the plans. This would therefore remove the investment, inflation and longevity risks.
In Canada, the UK and Switzerland, the Group works with the governing bodies to ensure that the investment policy adopted is consistent with the
Group’s tolerance for risk. In the US the Group has direct control over the investment policy, subject to local investment regulations.