
Our approach to ESG matters
The Company integrates Environmental, Social and
Governance (“ESG”) but does not pursue a sustainable
investment objective or otherwise take ESG factors into
account in a binding manner. ESG integration is the practice
of incorporating material environmental/social and governance
information or insights in a non-binding manner alongside
traditional measures into the investment decision process to
improve long-term financial outcomes ofportfolios. ESG
related research is one of many factors considered within the
investment process.
Defining ESG
●
Environmental factors include climate change,
energyefficiency, resource depletion and water and
wastemanagement.
●
Social factors include employee and community
relations,diversity, quality of life, enhancements in
knowledge and advances in supportive technology
forimproved resilience.
●
Governance factors include mitigation of risks such as
bribery and corruption, board diversity, executive pay,
accounting standards and shareholder rights, and
corporate behaviour.
ESG policy
Investment approach and ESG engagement
Responsible Investment is the term used to cover the
Manager’s work on ESG issues in the Company’s investee
companies. It is very wide ranging and all investment
decisions are made with consideration of the ESG context.
In some ESG areas the issues are easily measurable and
considerable progress can be seen.
The governance of many businesses has improved. Board
composition has become more diverse and gender equality is
gradually being tackled by the business community.
Remuneration packages are (broadly) being set with careful
consideration in dialogue with shareholders, and many of the
investee companies within the Company’s portfolio have good
levels of management ownership so shareholders and
management teams are well aligned.
There are, however, some ESG issues that are more
subjective and as a result progress is difficult to monitor.
Theenvironmental area is particularly challenging. We prefer
dialogue with, rather than the exclusion of, companies or
sectors that do not score as highly in environmental screening
so as to try and understand the issues. For example, the
portfolio continues to hold companies with exposure to fossil
fuels. It is our view that in the current stage of the energy
transition there is a need for fossil fuels, particularly lower
carbon emission fuels such as natural gas.
One of the ways an awareness of these issues colours
investment decisions is in the search for companies that
arehelping to provide answers. When viewed in this context,
ESG issues are both a challenge and also potential investment
opportunity. For example, some of the early-stage companies
held within the portfolio are addressing the need for de-
carbonisation through a variety of technologies including solid
state batteries, renewable energy and fuel cells. There are also
companies held within the portfolio where their end products
could have a societal benefit if they become fully
commercialised. For example, companies developing less
invasive surgical tools, or low-cost gene sequencing that would
allow more personalised medicine. Janus Henderson seeks to
protect and enhance value for the Company’s shareholders
through active management, integration of ESG factors into
investment decision making, company engagement and voting.
Voting and the Stewardship Code
The Board believes that voting at general meetings is an
important aspect of corporate stewardship and a means of
signalling shareholder views on board policy, practices and
performance. The Board has chosen to delegate responsibility
tothe Manager for voting the rights attached to the shares held
inthe Company’s portfolio, and the Manager actively votes at
shareholder meetings and engages with companies as part of the
voting process. Voting decisions are guided by the best interests
of the investee companies’ shareholders and made in
consultation with the Fund Managers, who have an in-depth
understanding of the respective companies’ operations. On
occasion, the Manager might make a voting decision following
consultation with the Chairman of the Board. Voting decisions are
taken in keeping with the provisions of the Manager’s Responsible
Investment Policy (see www. janushenderson.com) which sets
out the Manager’s approach to corporate governance and
compliance with the Stewardship Code (see www.frc.org.uk).
TheManager is also asignatory to the Principles for Responsible
Investment (seewww.unpri.org) and an active member of a wide
range of organisations and initiatives that work to promote
ESG integration and responsible investment.
In the year to 31 October 2024, investee companies held
106general meetings and the shares held in the Company’s
portfolio were voted at these meetings. The level of
governance in the companies held in the portfolio is generally
of a high standard which meant support in favour of the
majority of resolutions proposed by management was
warranted and the Company voted with management on the
majority of occasions (1,299 resolutions). However, in respect
of 1.5% of the resolutions proposed, the Fund Managers
believed that support in line with management
recommendation was not warranted so the shares were voted
against management recommendation on 20 resolutions.
During the year the Manager and Fund Managers engaged
with management and non-executives of companies held by
the Company to discuss corporate governance issues and to
help shape their policies on such matters. We go into three
case studies of recent engagements on the next page.
References made to individual securities do not constitute a
recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, investment
strategy or market sector, and should not be assumed to be
Henderson Opportunities Trust plc Annual Report 2024
27