SOUTH WEST WATER |
|
|
|
South West Water has continued to deliver good operational performance in the last year of the K5 (2010-2015) regulatory period alongside further improvements to customer service. This is supported by strong financial results - arising from good cost control and continued efficiency delivery. |
|
|
|
South West Water's business plan for K6 (2015-20) was assessed as 'enhanced' by Ofwat on 4 April 2014, the only water and sewerage company to achieve the top assessment, following which the Draft Determination was received on 30 April 2014. |
|
|
|
This early Draft Determination has given South West Water greater certainty over the plans and expectations for the next five years and has allowed delivery of key projects to be accelerated and advanced into 2014/15. This provides a strong platform for implementation and targeting enhanced equity returns. |
|
|
|
Financial Highlights |
|
|
|
As anticipated South West Water's revenues reflect the 2014/15 tariff freeze announced last year. However, good cost control and the continued delivery of cost efficiency has ensured that profit before tax and exceptional items at the half year has remained broadly stable. |
|
|
|
Revenue decreased by 0.3% to £268.3m as a result of the 2014/15 tariff freeze and the effects of customers switching to a metered tariff net of new connections and higher other sales. Customers switching from unmeasured to metered charging and assessed charges reduced revenue by £2.8m. 79% of South West Water's domestic customers are metered. 3,700 new customer connections contributed £1.6m of additional revenue and other sales increased by £0.4m as a result of greater developer activity. Customer demand is in line with the same period last year reflective of the relatively dry weather over the summer. |
|
|
|
Good operational cost control has ensured £2.5m of efficiencies fully offset cost increases (including power and business rates) of £2.4m. Cumulative cost increases over K5 continue to be lower than average RPI for the same period. Other cost drivers were: |
|
|
|
|
|
· |
£1.0m |
increased other costs including increased cost of sales from other sales activity |
|
· |
£0.4m |
increased depreciation and costs of new capital schemes |
|
|
|
EBITDA(1) decreased by £1.6m to £172.2m and operating profit(1) decreased by £2.1m to £119.2m. |
|
|
|
The net interest charge for the half year of £33.0m is lower than the same period last year (£34.0m) as a result of lower RPI on index-linked facilities and lower net pension interest net of new funding costs. |
|
|
|
Profit before tax and exceptional items decreased by £1.1m to £86.2m. |
|
|
|
During the year Pennon Group reviewed the long term sustainability of its defined pension benefits, of which South West Water represents 80%, and changes in benefits were agreed following extensive employee engagement. As a result an exceptional credit of £11.8m for South West Water arose from the capping of future pension increases and was recognised at the date that benefit changes were implemented (July 2014). |
|
|
|
Capital expenditure in the first half year of 2014/15 was £64.6m compared to £58.5m in the first half of 2013/14. Regulatory net capital expenditure(2) was £68.9m, compared to £64.7m in the first half of 2013/14. The focus for the programme remains weighted towards the maintenance of existing assets, increasing infrastructure resilience and delivering environmental improvements. Investments during the half year include: |
|
|
|
|
· |
continued improvements to safeguard water quality with treatment upgrades at two key sites |
|
· |
upgrades at wastewater treatment sites to improve compliance |
|
· |
innovative investments to reduce the number of customers' properties previously highlighted as at risk from flooding. |
|
|
|
Expenditure has been accelerated into 2014/15 from K6 to deliver early benefits to customers and the environment. This includes asset enhancements to deliver bathing water quality improvements, preparatory expenditure for the innovative new water treatment works at North Plymouth and asset interventions focused on delivering compliance benefits. |
|
|
|
The robustness of networks and assets is illustrated by South West Water achieving Ofwat's 'stable serviceability' status across all areas. |
|
|
|
Regulatory capital value at 31 March 2014 was £2,959m and with an increase in net debt this has led to gearing of 57% (31 March 2014: 56%) - within Ofwat's optimum range for K5. Increased projected RCV growth of 19% by 2020(3) in K6 reflects the Draft Determination inclusive of enhanced assessment benefits. South West Water's dividend to Pennon is ahead of the Final Determination 2009 (FD09) assumptions reflecting outperformance delivered during K5. |
|
|
|
(1) before exceptional credit |
|
(2) capital expenditure including infrastructure renewals expenditure less grants and contributions |
|
(3) nominal prices, RPI 3.2% assumed over K6 |
|
|
|
Efficiencies |
|
South West Water remains ahead of target in delivering the required operating cost efficiencies for K5. Cumulatively, the efficiency delivered over K5 is ahead of target reflecting the benefit of front end loading delivery during the K5 period. |
|
|
|
Annual operating costs are £24.7m lower as a consequence, with £2.5m cost savings delivered in the first half of 2014/15 (compared with £1.7m in the first half of 2013/14). This reflects an annual equivalent of 3.2% compared to the required 2.8%(1)pa average operating cost efficiencies included within FD09.This is being achieved through South West Water's ongoing improvement programmes with specific initiatives this year in the areas of: |
|
|
|
|
· |
operational ways of working - finalised asset improvements through the PUROS(2) programme |
|
· |
energy procurement and usage - continuing energy efficiency schemes alongside additional power generation through renewable sources |
|
· |
right-sourcing and innovative contracting - tendering to achieve the 'right price', including in-sourcing of key strategic contracts. |
|
|
|
South West Water continues to deliver capital projects in line with Ofwat, Drinking Water Inspectorate and Environment Agency expectations. Expenditure for the K5 period to date is lower than the Capital Incentive Scheme baseline and is set to achieve a 6% efficiency outperformance on the Final Determination. Performance cumulatively to date is in line with expectations and has been reflected in the Draft Determination for K6. |
|
|
|
South West Water will continue to target further efficient ways of working and the robust base gives a solid platform into the K6 regulatory period. |
|
|
|
(1) average over K5 (2010-2015) |
|
(2) PUROS - Phased Utilisation of Remote Operating Systems |
|
|
|
Operational Highlights |
|
|
|
Driven by its strategic vision for delivering 'Pure Water, Pure Service and Pure Environment', South West Water targets the provision of high quality water and wastewater services in the most efficient and sustainable way possible. |
|
|
|
Pure Water |
|
The focus on delivering a water supply to a high level of water quality compliance in accordance with the tough standards set by the Drinking Water Inspectorate remains a key aim of South West Water. As a result, a significant proportion of the company's capital programme is focused on this outcome, including an upgrade to its largest water treatment works - Restormel - which provides water to 50% of customers in Cornwall. South West Water is on track to deliver outstanding water quality again this year. |
|
|
|
South West Water is continuing to deliver industry-leading leakage performance. Leakage targets have been met every year since their introduction. |
|
|
|
Whilst the region experienced drier weather over the summer period, as predicted South West Water successfully managed its water resources to enable a continued secure supply of water for the region, resulting in the 18th consecutive year without a hosepipe ban or drought order. |
|
In June 2014 the company published its Water Resources Management Plan. This highlighted the company's strong water resources position and confidence in a forecast net surplus of water until at least 2040. |
|
|
|
Pure Service |
|
Throughout this regulatory period South West Water has sought to improve the service delivered to customers. The improving trend has seen South West Water's customer service score (as measured by the Service Improvement Mechanism (SIM)) continue to improve with the current year forecast to be the highest yet. Written complaints for the first half of the year are 16% lower than the same period last year. |
|
|
|
South West Water continues to build on strategic investment made during the K5 period, such as using its customer relationship system to manage customer contacts through to first time resolution and providing online offerings such as 'My Account' account management and smartphone apps. In addition South West Water is continuing to focus on increasing customer satisfaction and a number of improvement initiatives have been expanded to support this including web improvements and outbound SMS messaging notifying customers of any events or incidents within their area. |
|
|
|
The cost of bad debts as a proportion of revenue at 1.8% is comparable with the prior half year. South West Water continues to target collection initiatives to improve the bad debt position including reducing the debt impacts of newly vacated properties and the use of tracing tools to identify the location of former occupiers. South West Water continues to fund and promote ways to help customers who struggle to pay their debt through initiatives such as the Restart programme which incentivises customers into regular payment plans. Almost 38,000 customers have been assisted through the company's industry leading approach to debt support schemes. South West Water has the highest number of customers on the Watersure tariff and is one of the only companies to have introduced a regional social tariff. |
|
|
|
Pure Environment |
|
The 2014 bathing season ended again with strong bathing water quality results, with 125 (86%) of the region's beaches achieving the EU guideline standard (excellent status) and 144 (99%) of beaches achieving the mandatory standard (good status). |
|
|
|
South West Water is committed to working with other organisations and local communities so that residents and visitors alike can continue to enjoy the region's beautiful beaches. Investment to further protect and improve the region's bathing water quality will be made during 2015-20. Ahead of the European Union's Revised Bathing Water Directive coming into force in 2015 work has already begun on a range of targeted improvements in seven locations under the company's £20m 'Even Cleaner Seas' programme. This includes additional storm water storage capacity, improved monitoring and treatment facilities. |
|
|
|
A significant increase in the treatment compliance at wastewater works has been delivered with current compliance at over 97%, compared to 92.5% for the year to March 2014. In addition, the number of pollution incidents has fallen, with the number of Category 2 (significant) incidents falling to two in the first half of the year compared to eight over the same period last year. There have also been no Category 1 (serious) pollution incidents again this year. Tougher sentencing guidelines are now in place for pollutions and the company continues to invest in ways to minimise the risk of a pollution incident occurring. |
|
|
|
South West Water recognises the impact that flooding has on its customers and is investing in ways to reduce the number of customers' properties at risk. In 2014 this has included the £2m scheme at Colebrook in Devon which has seen a range of sewer improvements carried out thanks to joint funding between South West Water, the Environment Agency, and Plymouth City Council. |
|
|
|
As well as traditional engineering solutions, the company is also piloting a new approach to flood alleviation known as 'Downstream Thinking'. This involves the use of sustainable cost-effective measures to improve urban drainage. The first of a series of pilot schemes - known as 'WaterShed' - has been launched in Truro following consultation with local residents and in partnership with a range of local agencies and organisations. |
|
|
|
The company has continued to strive for improved performance against a number of Ofwat's Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). In particular improvements have been made on key environmental measures including wastewater treatment compliance and sewerage pollution incidents. Customer service, leakage and greenhouse gas emissions all achieved 'green' status at March 2014 and are on track to remain stable for the final year of K5. |
|
|
|
Regulatory and Political Developments |
|
|
|
K6 (2015-2020) Business Plan |
|
As the only water and sewerage company to have their K6 (2015-20) business plan assessed by Ofwat as 'enhanced' South West Water received an early Draft Determination on proposed pricing for K6 on 30 April 2014. As a result of this fast track determination, alongside the opportunities for early implementation, financial benefits received included an initial financial award of £11m reflected as an addition to the RCV with up to 50% reinvested and an enhanced total expenditure (Totex) menu with an extra 5% enhanced sharing rate. |
|
|
|
The early certainty received enables South West Water to transition swiftly and smoothly into the next regulatory period. Delivery of key projects - including those which improve the regions bathing waters and water quality - has been advanced. Accelerating projects assists in delivering outcomes and cost efficiencies in a timely fashion. |
|
|
|
The enhanced assessment of the business plan means South West Water also benefits from Ofwat's "Do No Harm" principle in respect of its Final Determination. |
|
|
|
The key elements of the Draft Determination for K6 are: |
|
|
|
|
· |
Equity returns up to 10% from outperformance of cost base, outcome delivery incentives (ODIs) and financing |
|
· |
Appointee vanilla WACC(1) of 3.85%, (3.7% WACC for wholesale only) |
|
· |
Retail margins of 1.0% and 2.5% for retail household and non-household respectively, equivalent to an RCV return of 0.15% |
|
· |
£47m additional allowed totex plus £8m menu incentive award as a result of cost bases for both water and waste water being assessed as efficient and below Ofwat's calculated baseline |
|
· |
RCV growth of 19%(2) and no adjustments to the planned K6 capital investment programme of £868m(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) pre tax debt and post-tax equity weighted average cost of capital |
|
(2) nominal prices assuming 3.2% pa RPI |
|
(3) 2012/13 price base |
|
|
|
Water Act |
|
|
|
The new Water Act became a statute on 14 May 2014. As well as setting out a range of reforms for the water sector in England, the Act enables retail competition for all non-household customers. |
|
|
|
South West Water is fully engaged in the 'Open Water' programme, governed by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and Ofwat, which will shape the retail market architecture and operational codes for the sector. |
|
|
|
Preparations are under way for the planned non-household retail market opening in April 2017. South West Water's operational structure is already aligned with the K6 approach of recognising separate revenue controls, with the majority of non-household retail activities located within a separate operation. In addition the dedicated brand of 'Source for Business' established in 2011 offers a range of specialist advice and support measures to non-household customers and the company obtained supply licences covering Scotland and England, enabling customers to be served both within and outside the South West region. |
|
|
|
South West Water Outlook |
|
|
|
South West Water continues to focus on maintaining an efficient service delivery, improvements in service to customers and the satisfaction of its regulatory and legislative obligations for the remainder of 2014/15. |
|
|
|
In addition to the immediate financial benefits of having an enhanced business plan for K6, projects have been advanced into 2014/15 enabling a swift and smooth transition into the K6 period. |
|
|
|
South West Water is already considering the impacts of future legislative changes which include the potential for "Upstream Reform". The company is engaging on key industry consultations on the development of Ofwat's ongoing regulatory reform agenda in order to influence the direction of travel in this area. |
|
|
|
|
|
VIRIDOR |
|
|
|
Viridor's strategy remains focused on transforming waste, adding substantial value through renewable energy generation and recycling. The half year results come at a point of inflexion for the company as it continues its strong progress on the construction and delivery of its growing PPP/ERF asset base. ERFs are central to the UK's waste and renewable energy strategies as the long term low cost alternative to landfill for treatment of residual waste, aligned with higher levels of recycling. Viridor expects to have at least 15% ERF market share by 2020 with a network of strategic ERFs which will underpin the company's long term profit growth. |
|
|
|
Given this inflexion, Viridor has implemented a strategic re-orientation of its business around its 'Energy' and 'Recycling & Resources' divisions and has strengthened its Board with new hires. |
|
|
|
The strong progress in the construction and operational delivery of Viridor's ERF asset base, and in the development of the Energy division, is underlined by the fact that all plants(1) are full at the time of opening. ERF asset and feedstock markets are now maturing, with a few major players emerging. In addition, the majority of long term municipal contracts have now been let. |
|
|
|
The focus for Viridor's Recycling division is on margin enhancement via quality optimisation, investment in technology and efficiency improvements, thereby reducing exposure to recyclate price movements. |
|
|
|
Landfill gas generation remains very profitable, albeit generation is slowly declining. Landfill continues to provide good cash generation whilst alternative uses for sites are being explored as they accelerate into closure. |
|
|
|
Financial Highlights |
|
|
|
As previously flagged, Viridor's financial performance was materially lower in the first half of 2014/15. This reflects the point of inflexion in the company's strategy, with full year 2014/15 EBITDA expected to exceed that of 2013/14. |
|
|
|
Revenues in the first half of 2014/15 were up 6.6% to £424.4m. Landfill tax collected increased by 10.4% to £106.8m driven by the increase in landfill tax to £80 per tonne from 1 April 2014. Construction revenue was also up reflecting growth in assets under construction. |
|
|
|
Viridor's EBITDA(1) for the half year decreased by £13.3m (32.1%) to £28.1m. PBIT fell £17.8m (98.9%) to £0.2m, but joint ventures were up £2.6m (48.1%) to £8.0m, resulting in PBIT plus joint ventures decreasing by £15.2m (65.0%) to £8.2m. Viridor underlying EBITDA was down £9.7m (14.9%) to £55.3m. |
|
|
|
Viridor underlying EBITDA is a new non-statutory earnings measure that aggregates all of Viridor's earnings into a single figure, consisting of EBITDA £28.1m (H1 2013/14 £41.4m) plus IFRIC 12 finance income £5.8m (H1 2013/14 £4.2m) and share of joint venture EBITDA £21.4m (H1 2013/14 £19.4m). Viridor's share of non-recourse debt in its joint ventures was £303m. The introduction of this measure is timed to coincide with the significant progress made in the build out of Viridor's ERF business and will ensure earnings from ERFs contracted and accounted for in differing ways are captured in a single measure. |
|
|
|
Profit before tax decreased £10.6m (69.3%) to £4.7m reflecting lower PBIT plus joint ventures partly offset by the benefit of reduced interest from intra group funding. |
|
|
|
Capital expenditure for the half year was £127.3m (H1 2013/14 £146.6m) of which circa £116m was for Viridor growth projects (largely ERFs, but including recycling technology investment). |
|
|
|
Following an extensive strategy planning exercise, Viridor is now actively implementing a major transformation of its business processes and procedures, including installation of a new enterprise IT platform. The first elements have recently been successfully delivered. As a result, over the next five years ongoing benefits in excess of the c. £30m capital investment are expected to be realised. (1) All figures before exceptional credit |
|
|
|
Operational Highlights |
|
|
|
UK context |
|
|
|
The UK is required under the EU Waste Framework and Landfill Directives to increase recycling, to achieve greater resource efficiency and to reduce the amount of biodegradable municipal waste going to landfill sites. This is being achieved by incentivising a major increase in recycling levels with residual waste increasingly being used for energy recovery. |
|
|
|
The Government's main mechanism for diverting waste from landfill, and incentivising recycling and ERFs remains landfill tax. The Government has implemented its landfill tax escalator to reach £80 per tonne from 1 April 2014 and has confirmed a further inflationary rise next year. This ongoing increase continues to enhance the long term economics of both recycling and UK energy recovery. In addition, recyclate costs are typically significantly lower than the cost of using virgin materials for manufacturers. The EU and the UK Government have also introduced policy and regulation to deliver greater quality in recycled materials. |
|
|
|
Viridor is clearly focused on recycling and renewable energy using waste as fuel. Investment in technology and operational practices continues to be made successfully to enhance recyclate quality to differentiate Viridor from its competitors. Significant progress has also been made in the development and delivery of the ERF business, with a substantial asset base being constructed and now becoming operational. This is being delivered in conjunction with the development of the associated business capability process across the whole "source to supply" ERF and recycling value chains. |
|
|
|
Recycling |
|
|
|
During the half year recycling volumes remained relatively stable at 0.9m tonnes. Recyclate prices have stabilised to some degree for most commodities but remain under pressure, reflecting global economic conditions and competitive markets. Overall average revenues per tonne from recyclate sales and gate fees for the half year fell to £86, 7.5% lower than for the same period last year. Viridor remains cautious about future recyclate price growth and shipping costs. |
|
|
|
Recycling EBITDA in the first half of 2014/15 was £10.0m (H1 2013/14 £13.1m). Viridor is implementing a two year Input, Throughput, Output Optimisation programme (ITOO) to provide an enhanced focus on increasing margins by taking actions across the value chain. The company is targeting a substantial enhancement in EBITDA margin through improvements in asset productivity. Future actions are focused on the three key parts of the value chain: |
|
|
|
· |
Inputs: Enforcing contractual waste specifications to ensure optimum quality and further reduce reject levels |
|
|
|
· |
Throughput: A two year asset management optimisation process has commenced to improve availability and productivity at recycling facilities |
|
|
|
· |
Outputs: Aiming for customer-centric quality production aided by investment in technology. A new polymers separation plant at Rochester is now operational, and a new glass reprocessing plant in Scotland is now in commissioning. These represent an investment of c. £25m. |
|
|
|
Two underperforming Materials Recycling Facilities (MRFs) were closed in the first half of 2014/15 to reduce the cost base and improve portfolio efficiency. |
|
|
|
Viridor continues to operate the most extensive MRF capacity in the UK with accreditations for export to China, and is established as a quality brand in the UK and other far eastern markets. |
|
|
|
Contracts and collection |
|
|
|
Viridor's contract base and collection operations remain a key element of Viridor's integrated offering. Collections play an increasing role in securing in-house recycling materials and fuel for ERFs. EBITDA for collections reduced slightly to £5.4m (H1 2013/14 £6.1m). |
|
|
|
As previously flagged, in the first half of 2014/15 contracts (comprising 15 local authority contracts plus Thames Water and ERFs) profits were slightly lower due to contract expiry but the profit reduction was lower than expected given asset disposals and contract wins including: |
|
|
|
· |
Hertfordshire County Council residual waste, 75,000 tonnes p.a. |
|
· |
Extension of the Borough of Poole contract, residual and recycling to 2027 |
|
· |
Kent County Council recyclables for processing, 60,000 tonnes p.a. |
|
|
|
Joint Ventures |
|
|
|
Total share of joint ventures' EBITDA (comprising VLGM (including IFRIC 12 interest), TPSCo and Lakeside) was up 10.3% to £21.4m (H1 2013/14 £19.4m). Total share of joint ventures' profit after tax was £2.4m, up £1.6m from H1 2013/14. |
|
|
|
(a) |
Viridor Laing (Greater Manchester) (VLGM) |
|
|
|
The 25 year Greater Manchester Waste PFI contract (being delivered through VLGM) is the UK's largest ever combined waste and renewable energy project. The company is a joint venture between Viridor and John Laing Infrastructure. Operation of the associated facilities (both existing facilities and those which are to be developed) is being carried out on a sub- contract basis by Viridor. |
|
|
|
As reported previously, solid recovered fuel produced from the waste will be used to generate heat and power at a plant being built at Runcorn. Phase I is being built primarily for the Greater Manchester Waste PFI contract and Phase II will be available for the market generally, as high landfill tax drives residual waste away from landfill towards recycling and ERFs. |
|
|
|
As part of the VLGM contract, a separate contractor was mandated to construct 43 facilities. As at 30 September 2014, 42 of these facilities had been formally taken over by Viridor. The final plant is nearing completion of its commissioning tests. |
|
|
|
Viridor's share of VLGM's EBITDA was £1.5m (H1 2013/14 £1.2m). Viridor's share of IFRIC 12 interest was £6.0m (H1 2013/14 £6.2m). |
|
|
|
(b) |
Runcorn I (TPSCo) |
|
|
|
Viridor's share of TPSCo's EBITDA was £4.5m (H1 2013/14 £5.5m). |
|
|
|
The Runcorn ERF Phase I project is about to move into final takeover tests (after first waste burn in March 2014), moving towards scheduled takeover in early 2015. Phase II has been only slightly affected by the Phase I delays, is on budget and first waste burn is imminent. |
|
|
|
(c) |
Lakeside |
|
|
|
Lakeside, the first of Viridor's ERF projects, continues to outperform its financial close assumed power generation and waste processing targets. Viridor's share of Lakeside's EBITDA was £9.4m (H1 2013/14 £6.4m). |
|
|
|
Results in the first half of 2014/15 benefitted from different scheduled outage timing (H1 2013/14 vs H2 2014/15) and continued good performance. |
|
|
|
Renewable Energy |
|
|
|
Energy recovery from waste (both biodegradable and non-biodegradable) accounted for 8% of total UK renewable energy generated in 2012. Viridor believes that by 2020 UK energy recovery from waste could produce 15,000 GWh of the total forecasted UK renewable energy generation (120,000 GWh) accounting for circa 13%. This is particularly significant given predicted capacity shortages in the energy sector. |
|
|
|
(a) |
Energy Recovery Facilities |
|
|
|
Viridor continues to make excellent progress on the construction and delivery of its PPP/ERFs asset base. In 2014/15, two plants (Exeter and Oxford) have become operational to date - in addition to the already operating Lakeside and Bolton plants - with three further plants (Cardiff, and Runcorn I and II) expected to be operational by year end. |
|
|
|
With regards to securing fuel, of the new and developing facilities, five are full. All plants (excluding Dunbar) are full at opening with more than 60% of feedstock coming from long term contracts and the balance from shorter term Industrial and Commercial (IC) contracts. Average gate fees are at modelled rates. The proportion of long-term local authority contracted material (circa 60%) versus commercial inputs providing well-balanced risk. |
|
|
|
Progress on delivery of the ERF asset base can be summarised as: |
|
|
|
· |
Exeter ERF - Safely completed on time (July), meeting capital budget and performing better than specification |
|
· |
Oxford ERF - Takeover completed in November and plant fully operational. Below capital budget spend and performing better than specification |
|
· |
Cardiff ERF - Construction complete and first waste burn has just occurred. On schedule and to capital budget |
|
· |
Runcorn Phase I - Plant about to move into final takeover test |
|
· |
Runcorn Phase II - construction complete, to capital budget and first waste burn is imminent |
|
· |
Peterborough ERF - Progressing well to schedule and to capital budget |
|
· |
Glasgow Recycling and Renewable Energy Centre - Construction progressing well and on schedule for completion 2016 as planned |
|
· |
Beddington ERF - Judicial review challenge strongly dismissed. Well prepared for project commencement |
|
· |
Dunbar ERF - Board approval to proceed. Construction commencement expected Q1 2015 |
|
· |
Overall programme is being delivered at world class safety levels and to good quality standards |
|
|
|
The Pennon Board has given its approval to proceed with the £177m Dunbar ERF at its existing Oxwellmains waste treatment hub in East Lothian, Scotland. This follows an extensive assessment of market conditions and an appraisal of current competitive advantages. |
|
|
|
The facility is integral to the Scottish Government's ambitions to deliver a zero waste, circular economy which encourages landfill diversion and maintains price regulation. There is good support for the project as evidenced by all necessary planning, environmental and operational consents having been secured. Following a competitive procurement process, an EPC contract is also already in place with trusted suppliers. The project is therefore "shovel ready" and construction is expected to commence in Q1 2015. |
|
|
|
The plant will treat 300,000 tonnes per annum (tpa) of waste and is supported by a potential feedstock market of 1.25m tpa in the direct catchment area. The market comprises 570,000tpa Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) and 680,000tpa Commercial and Industrial (C&I) arisings. Viridor already has long term tonnages readily available to feed the plant as it currently services 110,000tpa of C&I waste in the central belt of Scotland. The company is well placed for the active MSW procurements and has qualified for three currently in progress: Clyde Valley (minimum 98,000tpa, likely 180,000tpa); Edinburgh and Midlothian (75,000tpa, likely 120,000 tpa) and South Lanarkshire (60,000tpa, likely 85,000tpa). The Dunbar facility is not reliant, however, on MSW procurement to achieve successful commercial returns. Being the first to commit to building an ERF in the Dunbar area provides Viridor with a significant first mover advantage over any potential competitors and there are no competitor facilities currently in progress. |
|
|
|
At 30 September 2014, Viridor had 34MW of renewable energy capacity across its share of Lakeside ERF, Bolton and Exeter ERF and its Anaerobic Digestion (AD) operations, in addition to its 105 MW of landfill gas capacity. Since the end of the period, a further 24MW has been added with the takeover of Oxford ERF. The ERF asset base coming on stream in 2014/15 and in development will raise cumulative electricity generation capacity to over 300MW and cumulative ERF waste treatment capacity to around 2.8m tonnes. |
|
|
|
ERF contracts and projects already contribute to the bottom line and reflect the realisation of a strategy which is expected to add circa £100m to Viridor's EBITDA in 2016/17. |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Landfill gas power generation |
|
|
|
Viridor's landfill energy business is being managed to maximise the value of landfill gas power generation, whilst exploring photovoltaic (PV) and cryogenic energy generating developments as alternative uses for landfill sites with existing grid connections. |
|
|
|
Gas volumes reached peak production in 2012/13 and are expected to gradually reduce over the coming years. In the first half of 2014/15 the landfill gas power generation output was marginally down to 297 Gigawatt hours (GWh) (H1 2013/14 303 GWh), reflecting a successful output optimisation programme. Landfill gas power generation EBITDA was £15.4m (H1 2013/14 £18.1m). |
|
|
|
Average revenue per Megawatt hour (MWh) was flat, while average costs increased to £36.51 per MWh due to maintenance costs to improve gas capture. The switch from legacy Non Fossil Fuel Obligation (NFFO) contracts to Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROCs) continues with 94% of energy now sold under the higher value ROCs. The remaining 6% NFFO component will migrate to ROCs by 2016/17. Total landfill gas power generation operational capacity reduced to 105MW (excluding 3MW capacity at sub-contract sites in Suffolk), from 107MW last half year. |
|
|
|
Future alternative uses for landfill sites are now being assessed as most of our landfill operations accelerate into closure. A 2.75MW PV installation at Westbury landfill was completed during the first half of 2014/15. Other alternative uses are also being explored, including an £8m cryogenic energy storage pilot project at Pilsworth landfill, funded by the Department of Energy and Climate Change. |
|
|
|
Landfill |
|
|
|
The business plan now being implemented for the landfill business is seeing operations reduced to a few strategic landfill sites, reflecting the fact that there will still be demand for landfilling of certain materials for the foreseeable future. Other sites are being run to closure with an emphasis on maximising the value of electricity generation from landfill gas and reducing costs. Non-strategic sites and closed sites are being assessed for alternative uses - both for energy and for development potential. Three sites are being closed in 2014/15 and a similar closure rate is forecast for the next five years. |
|
|
|
The business continues to be cash generative and contributed £9.3m to EBITDA in the first half of the year. Volumes were stable at 1.4m tonnes. |
|
|
|
Average gate fees decreased by 15.2% to £19.73 per tonne. Consented landfill capacity reduced from 58.0 million cubic metres (mcm) at 31 March 2014 to 56.1 mcm at 30 September 2014, reflecting usage during the period. As previously stated, and provided for, 39 mcm is not expected to be used. |
|
|
|
Landfill tax has increased to its maximum level under the Landfill Tax Escalator of £80 per tonne. The Government has confirmed that it will rise next year by the rate of inflation. |
|
|
|
Outlook for Viridor |
|
|
|
Viridor has reached its expected point of inflexion in its ongoing transformation from being predominantly a landfill business to becoming a leading recycling and renewable energy provider. |
|
|
|
As forecast and previously flagged, EBITDA in the first half of 2014/15 is materially lower than in the same period last year. The new ERFs will boost results in the second half of 2014/15 significantly such that full year 2014/15 EBITDA is expected to exceed full year 2013/14. |
|
|
|
Viridor's full year performance is predicated on the continued successful delivery of the ERF business. Two ERFs have already been handed over in 2014/15, with a further three ERFs set to become operational this financial year. |
|
|
|
Importantly, all plants(1) are full at opening with more than 60% of feedstock coming from long term contracts and the balance from shorter term Industrial and Commercial (IC) contracts. Average gate fees are at modelled rates. The committed ERF projects are expected to contribute £100m to Viridor's EBITDA in 2016/17. |
|
|
|
A two year asset optimisation programme in recycling has commenced. The focus for the recycling division is on margin enhancement driven via quality, investment in technology and managing the cost base. |
|
|
|
Viridor's transformational strategy is now being realised. Its asset base of ERFs will drive long term profitability together with a complementary quality focus in recycling. |
|
|
|
(1) excluding Dunbar |
|
|
|
|
|
GROUP FINANCIAL POSITION |
|
|
|
The Group funding strategy utilises a mix of fixed, floating and index-linked rate borrowings. A substantial portion of debt is finance leasing which provides a long maturity profile and secured credit margins. |
|
|
|
The Group has fixed or put in place swaps to fix the interest rate on at least 50% of South West Water's net debt for the remainder of the K5 period. The average rate achieved on the fixed rate debt is circa 3.4%. In addition £391m of South West Water's debt is index-linked at an overall real rate of 1.7%. Pennon Group's average interest rate for the half year to 30 September 2014 was 3.7% and South West Water's was 3.8%. |
|
|
|
The Group has also fixed the substantial majority of South West Water's existing floating rate debt to the end of K6. The rates reflect the fall in interest rates since 2009 taken account of by Ofwat in setting the cost of capital for K6. |
|
|
|
The Group had substantial cash resources and committed funding as at 30 September 2014 and is well placed in current financial market conditions: |
|
|
|
|
- |
cash balances of £694m (SWW £254m), including £174m restricted cash |
|
|
- |
undrawn facilities of £1,091m |
|
|
|
During the six months to 30 September 2014 £650m of new facilities were secured: |
|
|
|
|
- |
£410m of new Revolving Credit Facilities (RCF's) and term loans; including |
|
|
|
· |
£125m 17 year facility for Plc |
|
|
|
· |
£130m Schuldschein for Plc |
|
|
|
· |
£80m 15 year facility for SWW |
|
|
|
· |
£75m RCF's for both Plc and SWW |
|
|
|
|
- |
£240m of new finance leases |
|
|
|
· |
£175m of finance leases for Viridor ERF's |
|
|
|
· |
£65m finance lease for SWW |
|
|
|
The £125m Convertible Bonds due 2014 have all converted resulting in the issuance of 20.9m Pennon shares. |
|
|
|
The Group's average debt maturity is 21 years. |
|
|
|
The fair value of the Group's debt is £190m less than its book value. |
|
|
|
PENSIONS |
|
|
|
The Group's defined benefit pension schemes had a deficit (net of deferred tax) under IAS 19 at 30 September 2014 of circa £75m (£94m gross), an increase of £12m on the 31 March 2014 balance. |
|
|
|
Schemes' assets increased from £608m at 31 March 2014 to £629m at 30 September 2014 and schemes' liabilities increased from £687m to £723m over the same period, driven by a decrease in the long term AA corporate bond rates used to discount scheme liabilities. |
|
|
|
The net deficit represents circa 2% of current market capitalisation. |
|
|
|
During the year the Group reviewed the long term sustainability of its main defined pension benefit scheme and agreed to changes in benefits with the scheme trustee following extensive employee engagement. An exceptional credit of circa £15m (£12m net of tax) relating to past service cost has been recognised in operating profit following changes in scheme design, in particular the introduction of a cap on increases in pensionable pay. |
|
|
|
South West Water's pension cash contributions continue to be within the Final Determination for the K5 period. |
|
|
|
The March 2013 actuarial valuation has been completed. |
|
|
|
TAXATION |
|
|
|
Pennon takes seriously its responsibility for paying its fair share of tax. |
|
|
|
The mainstream corporation tax charge for the half year (before prior year adjustment) was £19.8m (H1 2013/14 £27.0m) giving an effective current tax rate of 20% (H1 2013/14 24%) which is close to the current UK statutory corporation tax rate of 21%. The reduced rate compared to last year reflects the increase in capitalised interest, increased capital allowances and the 1% reduction in the corporation tax rate. |
|
|
|
Before exceptional items deferred tax for the half year was a debit of £14.2m (H1 2013/14 credit £28.2m). |
|
|
|
The 2013/14 credit included a credit of £40.1m from the impact of the reductions in the rate of corporation tax enacted in July 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES |
|
|
|
In accordance with DTR4.2.3 and 4.2.7 of the Disclosure & Transparency Rules the principal risks and uncertainties for the remaining six months of the financial year for the Group which could have a material adverse affect on the Group's business, financial condition, results, operations and reputation: |
|
|
|
|
South West Water |
|
|
· |
changes in law, regulation or decisions by governmental bodies or regulators |
|
· |
non-recovery of customer debt |
|
· |
poor operating performance due to extreme weather and climate change |
|
· |
poor service provided to customers |
|
· |
non-compliance or occurrence of avoidable health and safety incidents |
|
· |
significant operational failures or incidents |
|
· |
uncertainty arising from regulatory market reforms |
|
|
|
|
Viridor |
|
|
· |
changes in law, regulation or decisions by governmental bodies or regulators |
|
· |
reduced waste volumes to landfill and in the overall market |
|
· |
business interruption particularly in growing energy recovery facilities business |
|
· |
downward pressure on UK wholesale power prices |
|
· |
non-compliance or occurrence of avoidable health and safety incidents |
|
· |
failure or increased cost of capital projects and/or joint ventures not achieving predicted revenues or performance |
|
· |
exposure to contractor failure to deliver construction progress, increasing costs and potentially requiring lengthy legal action or other redress |
|
· |
reliability and performance of assets and obsolescence of plants |
|
· |
reduced customer base, increased competition affecting prices or reduced demand for services |
|
· |
potential over capacity in the UK and in other parts of the European ERF markets impacting demand for Viridor's new plants |
|
· |
information technology systems requiring replacement, development or upgrading to meet growing requirements of the business |
|
|
|
Group |
|
|
· |
an inability to raise sufficient funds to finance its activities or such funds only being available at higher cost |
|
· |
pension costs increasing due to higher cost for future service and growing deficit in relation to past service in the Defined Benefit Scheme. |
|
|
|
These principal risks and uncertainties are largely as set out, together with the mitigating actions of the Group, in the Group's 2014 Annual Report & Accounts which can be viewed on or downloaded from the Group's website, http://www.pennonannualreport.co.uk/2014/group/principal-risks-and-uncertainties.php or obtained from the Group Company Secretary at the Company's registered office. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOARD MATTERS |
|
|
|
|
|
The Board announced in September the planned retirement of David Dupont, Group Director of Finance and an Executive Director of Pennon Group Plc, on 31 January 2015. The Board would like to take this opportunity to express its gratitude to David for his significant contribution to the success of the Group and the strategic development of both South West Water and Viridor. In his 12 years as Group Director of Finance, David has successfully managed the financial affairs of Pennon during a period of substantial development and growth. He has put in place the funding required to take South West Water forward into the K6 period and to finance the construction of Viridor's committed ERF programme. The Board wishes him well for the future. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Board also announced in September that David's successor will be Susan Davy, currently Finance and Regulatory Director of South West Water. Susan was appointed to the South West Water Board 7 years ago and is well placed to take on the role immediately upon David's retirement. |
|
|
|
|
|
Neil Cooper joined the Board on 1 September 2014 as a Non-Executive Director and as chairman of the Audit Committee. Neil is Group Finance Director of William Hill PLC and previously was Group Finance Director of Bovis Homes Group PLC. |
|
|
|
|
|
INTERIM MANAGEMENT STATEMENTS AND PRE-CLOSE TRADING UPDATES |
|
|
|
|
|
With effect from 7 November 2014, the Financial Conduct Authority removed the requirement in the Disclosure and Transparency Rules to publish Interim Management Statements (IMSs). Before IMSs were introduced, Pennon published pre-close trading updates that were released immediately prior to pre-close meetings with analysts and investors. The Group intends to revert back to this policy and the next pre-close trading update will be released in late March 2015. |
|
|
|
|
|
Accordingly, the Group does not intend to issue IMSs in the future and will not issue one next February. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ken Harvey Chairman 28 November 2014 |
|
|
|
FINANCIAL TIMETABLE FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2015 |
|
29 January 2015 |
Ordinary shares quoted ex-dividend |
30 January 2015 |
Record date for interim cash dividend |
16 February 2015 |
Posting of Scrip dividend offer |
March 2015 |
Pre-close trading update |
9 March 2015 |
Final date for receipt of Forms of Election/Mandate |
2 April 2015 |
Interim cash dividend payment date |
20 May 2015 |
2014/15 Preliminary Results |
Late June 2015 |
Annual Report & Accounts published |
30 July 2015 |
Annual General Meeting |
August 2015 * |
Ordinary shares quoted ex-dividend |
August 2015 * |
Record date for final cash dividend |
September 2015 |
Pre-close trading update |
September 2015 * |
Final date for receipt of Forms of Election/Mandate |
October 2015 * |
Final cash dividend payment date |
|
|
* These dates are provisional and, in the case of the final dividend, subject to obtaining shareholder approval at the 2015 Annual General Meeting. |
|
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT IN RESPECT OF FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS |
|
This Results Statement contains forward-looking statements relating to the Pennon Group's operations, performance and financial position based on current expectations of, and assumptions and forecasts made by, Pennon Group management. Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as "anticipate", "aim", "believe", "continue", "could", "due", "estimate", "expect", "forecast", "goal", "intend", "may", "plan", "project", "remain", "seek", "should", "target", "will" and related and similar expressions, as well as statements in the future tense. Various known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors could lead to substantial differences between the actual future results, financial situation, development or performance of the Group and the estimates and historical results given herein including but not limited to those set out on page 30 and 31 of this Statement. Undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements which are made only as of the date of this Statement. No representation, assurance, guarantee or warranty is given in relation to them including as to their accuracy, completeness, or the basis on which they are made and nothing in this Statement should be construed as a profit forecast. |
|
The Group accepts no obligation publicly to revise or update these forward-looking statements or adjust them as a result of new information or for future events or developments, except to the extent legally required. |
|
UNSOLICITED COMMUNICATIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS |
|
A number of companies, including Pennon Group Plc, continue to be aware that their shareholders have received unsolicited telephone calls or correspondence concerning investment matters which imply a connection to the company concerned. These are typically from overseas based 'brokers' who target UK shareholders, offering to buy their shares. Shareholders are advised to be wary of any unsolicited advice, offers to buy shares or offers of free reports on the Company. Details of any share dealing facilities that the Company endorses will be included in Company mailings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|