
The scope of our audit
As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial
statements.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditors’ professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the
financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or
not due to fraud) identified by the auditors, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the
allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters, and any comments we
make on the results of our procedures thereon, were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a
whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
This is not a complete list of all risks identified by our audit.
The key audit matter below is consistent with last year.
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Recognition and reversal of expected credit losses on
amounts due from fellow Group undertakings.
As a financing company, the Company participates in the
financing arrangements of the Anglo American Group of
companies. At 31 December 2023, the Company had gross
amounts due from fellow Group companies of US$28,738
million (2022: US$33,845 million). The Company is exposed
to credit risk should a Group undertaking not be able to
service its debt obligations when they fall due. At 31
December 2023, the Company’s expected credit loss
increased by US$459 million from US$455 million to US$914
million.
In accordance with IFRS 9, management is required to assess
the allowance for the Company’s expected credit losses
(‘ECL’) on financial assets through the use of the impairment
requirements set forth in the standard. At each reporting date,
the Company must recognise the amount of expected credit
loss (or reversal) to adjust the loss allowance provision
calculated. To determine the ECL, the consideration of default
and probability of default is critical, as they impact the
measurement period of the loss (whether it is twelve months,
or the lifetime of the financial asset) and can be an indication
of significant change in credit risk. There is judgement in
determining whether a borrower has insufficient liquid assets
to repay a loan on demand, in part or in full. As part of this
assessment, management must determine the recoverable
amount of each receivable based on an assessment of the
financial position of the respective Group undertaking,
consideration of past evidence of default and future company-
specific and wider macroeconomic factors. Refer to notes 1, 5
and 8 of the financial statements.
We performed the following procedures to evaluate the ECL
recorded against the Company’s receivables from other
Group companies:
- we understood and evaluated management’s
processes and controls in respect of identifying and
assessing indicators of impairment and impairment
reversal related to receivables from fellow Group
undertakings;
- we evaluated and challenged management’s
assessment and judgements in respect of
impairment and impairment reversal indicators,
including ensuring consideration of events and
conditions across the Group, such as whether
broader non-financial asset impairments recorded in
the Group financial statements had been
considered in management’s analysis and
conclusions;
- we challenged management’s assessment as to
whether the counterparty had sufficient liquid net
assets or the ability to repay the loan on demand
and therefore if a loss allowance was required and
the level of the allowance;
- where management had identified indicators of a
change in credit risk, we examined and evaluated
management’s calculation of any associated credit
loss; and
- where no indicators of a change in credit risk were
identified, we reviewed management’s expected
credit loss assessment and assessed its
appropriateness in the context of the broader Group
and the expected manner of recovery and recovery
period of the intercompany loan.
Based on the procedures performed, we noted no material
issues arising from our work.
How we tailored the audit scope
We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed enough work to be able to give an opinion on the financial
statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Company, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry
in which it operates.
As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risk of material misstatement in the financial
statements. In particular, we considered where the directors had made subjective accounting judgements and estimates.
The impact of climate risk on our audit
As part of our audit we made enquiries of management to understand the extent of the potential impact of climate risk on the
Company's financial statements, and we remained alert when performing our audit procedures for any indicators of the impact of
climate risk. As the Company is the financing entity for the Anglo American Group, we considered the process undertaken by