
Viability statement
Viability statement
The context for assessment In accordance with the requirements
of the UK Corporate Governance Code, the aim of the Viability
Statement is for the Directors to report on the assessment of the
prospects of the Group meeting its liabilities over the assessment
period, considering the current financial position, outlook,
principal risks and uncertainties, and key judgements and
estimates in preparing the Financial Statements.
The Directors have based their assessment of viability on the
Group’s current business model and strategic plan, which is
updated and approved annually by the Board, in line with our
objectives to deliver sustainable and profitable growth, increase
shareholder value and offer an improved service and product
offering to our customers. This is underpinned by the strategic
priorities outlined on pages 24 to 27 of the Strategic Report. The
effective management of principal risks and uncertainties is
outlined within pages 70 to 80 and this assessment emphasises
those risks that could theoretically threaten the Group’s ability to
The assessment period
The Directors have assessed the viability of the Group over the
three-year period to May 2026, as this is an appropriate planning
time horizon given the speed of change and customer demand in
the industry and is in line with the Group’s strategic planning period.
Assessment of viability
The viability of the Group has been assessed considering the
Group’s current financial position, available bank facilities, and
the Board approved FY24 budget and three-year strategic plan.
It’s been a challenging year for the Group with a decline in the rate
of revenue growth and overall profitability, resulting in a loss
before taxation of £4.3m. The Group’s revenue performance and
profitability suffered from market volatility within Cyber Security
.
In particular, the Group experienced buying decision delays and
cancellations in the North American tech sector and our UK
market. These headwinds have further reinforced the need to
accelerate the implementation of our next chapter of the Group
strategy following its communication in February 2023. This strategy
requires a level of additional investment in 2024. Despite the above,
the Group has maintained consistent cash generation during the year.
Following the year end, the Group has engaged in additional
generating cost efficiencies across Cyber Security
and corporate
functions which is resulting in the implementation of a fundamental
reorganisation generating further savings compared to the prior
year. As a result of all of the above, the base case budget for
FY24 has been prepared on the basis that market volatility within
Cyber Security
partially continues with overall profitability
remaining similar to 2023.
In addition, the base case budget for FY24 also reflects recent
growth patterns in the other geographical regions and operating
segments, relevant growth opportunities for the Group based on
existing propositions and factoring in current macro-economic
factors most specifically existing inflationary pressures.
The Directors have also modelled the impact of certain severe
but plausible scenarios arising from the principal risks, which
have the greatest potential impact on viability in the period under
review, as set out in the table below. Further details of how these
sensitivities have been applied are provided in the going concern
The impact of these sensitivities has been reviewed against the
Group’s projected cash flow position, available bank facilities
and compliance with financial covenants over the three-year
Group’s financing arrangements and expiry dates. The sensitivities
applied under stress testing show adequate levels of headroom
and that no mitigating actions are required to address severe but
plausible scenarios modelled by management.
While noting that no mitigating actions are required to address
severe but plausible scenarios modelled by management, options
available include a reduction of planned capital expenditure,
headcount reduction, freezing pay and recruitment and not
paying a dividend to shareholders, all of which are within the
Directors’ control and give an additional level of headroom.
Conclusions
Based on these severe but possible scenarios, the Directors
have a reasonable expectation that the Group and Company will
be able to continue in operation and remain commercially viable
over the three year period of assessment.
Viability risk
Risk as applied to viability
assessment Specifics of scenario modelled Potential impact
Ineffective
execution of the
Group’s strategy
Inability to retain/
recruit colleagues
to meet the
resource needs
of the business
A poor strategy or ineffective
execution of a strategy could
have a material negative
impact on the Group’s financial
performance and value.
Loss of key colleagues or
significant colleague turnover
could result in a lack of
necessary expertise or
continuity to execute the
Group’s strategy.
In order to consider the impact of the
risks identified management has
modelled two scenarios:
Assurance business does not improve
beyond that seen in FY23 Q4.
to be implemented as part of the
Group’s strategy are not executed.
Scenario modelled assumes annualised
impact of £3.2m adverse impact
on profitability.
The impact of these sensitivities has been
reviewed against the Group’s projected cash
flow position, available bank facilities and
compliance with financial covenants over the
three year viability period. The sensitivities
applied under stress testing show adequate
levels of headroom and that no mitigating
actions are required.
Over reliance
on market sector
or client
Economic changes/
volatility impact
on revenue
A loss of key customers or
over-reliance on market sector
can result in a reduction in
revenue and consequential
impact on profitability and
cash generation.
Loss of clients or reduction in
client spend will result in a loss
of revenue.
Scenario modelled assumes loss of key
customers resulting in a reduction in
profitability of £4.2m.
The impact of these sensitivities has been
reviewed against the Group’s projected cash
flow position, available bank facilities and
compliance with financial covenants over the
three year viability period. The sensitivities
applied under stress testing show adequate
levels of headroom and that no mitigating
actions are required.
Economic changes/
volatility impact
on profitability
Being a global organisation the
Group is exposed to global and
regional macro-economic
factors such as inflation and
rising interest rates.
Scenario modelled assumes additional
wage increases to align with regional
inflation rates across different
geographies of £5.0m. UK Interest rates
on borrowings forecast to rise a further
0.75% from original forecast. Incremental
annual utility costs of £0.2m included.
The impact of these sensitivities has been
reviewed against the Group’s projected cash flow
position, available bank facilities and compliance
with financial covenants over the three year
viability period. The sensitivities applied under
stress testing show adequate levels of headroom
and that no mitigating actions are required.
NCC Group plc 81
Strategic report