
54
Key Audit Matters How our scope addressed this matter
Unquoted Investments – note 9 - £27,887k (2023: £22,387k)
The entity holds investments in unquoted shares and loan stock,
whose valuation relies on estimation, posing a risk of material
misstatement in the financial statements.
Valuation Methodology:
There is a risk that the Investment Manager may apply an
inappropriate valuation methodology when valuing unquoted
investments at period-end. This could result in a misstatement of
the investments' fair value in the financial statements.
Judgemental Inputs:
The potential exists for the investments to be inappropriately
valued at the balance sheet date due to manipulation of
judgemental inputs. This risk arises from the subjective nature of
certain valuation inputs, which may be susceptible to
manipulation to achieve desired outcomes.
Management Override:
An inherent risk of management override exists in the valuation
process. The unquoted investment valuations are prepared by the
Investment Manager, who is remunerated based on the net asset
value of the Company. This creates a potential conflict of interest,
as there may be incentives for the Investment Manager to
manipulate valuations to enhance their compensation or to meet
performance targets.
For all investments in our sample, our audit procedures included
the following:
• Challenged whether the valuation methodology was the
most appropriate in the circumstances under the
International Private Equity and Venture Capital
Valuation (IPEV) Guidelines and the applicable
accounting standard.
• Recalculated the value attributable to the Company,
considering the application of enterprise value across
the capital structures of the investee companies.
• Engaged the expertise of our valuations expert to assist
in the assessment of fair values for Level 3 investments
within the VCT's portfolio.
For investments sampled that were valued using less subjective
valuation techniques (e.g., price of recent investment reviewed for
changes in fair value), the following was performed:
• Verified the cost or price of recent investment with
supporting documentation.
• Considered whether the investment was an arm's length
transaction by reviewing the parties involved and
checking for existing investors of the investee company.
• Assessed indications that the price of recent investment
might no longer be representative of fair value,
considering factors such as the current performance of
the investee company and the milestones and
assumptions set out in the investment proposal.
• Assessed whether the price of recent investment is
supported by alternative valuation techniques.
For investments sampled that were valued using more subjective
techniques (e.g., earnings multiples, revenue multiples, and
discounted cash flow forecasts), our audit procedures included:
• Challenged and corroborated the inputs to the valuation
with reference to management information of investee
companies and the subsequent investment managers
adjustments to that data, market data, and our own
understanding, and assessing the impact of estimation
uncertainty of these assumptions.
• Reviewed historical financial statements and recent
management information available to support
assumptions about maintainable revenues, earnings, or
cash flows used in the valuations.
• Considered the revenue or earnings multiples applied
and the discounts applied by reference to observable
listed company market data.
• Challenged the consistency and appropriateness of
adjustments made to such market data in establishing
the revenue, cash flow, or earnings multiple applied in
arriving at the valuations adopted, considering the
individual performance of investee companies against
plan and relative to the peer group, market, and sector.
• Where appropriate, we performed a sensitivity analysis
by developing our own point estimate where we
considered that alternative input assumptions could
reasonably had been used, and assessed the overall
impact of such sensitivities on the portfolio of
investments to determine whether the valuations as a
whole were reasonable and free from bias.
Key observations:
Based on our audit procedures across sampled investments, we
have confirmed the appropriateness and accuracy of valuation
methodologies applied, ensuring compliance with International
Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation (IPEV) Guidelines
and relevant accounting standards. Our assessments included
challenges and validations of both less subjective and more
subjective valuation techniques, ultimately confirming the