
128 ScS Group plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023
Financial statements continued
Independent auditors’ report to the members of ScS Group plc continued
Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Impairment of assets in relation
to loss making stores (group)
Refer to pages 93 (Audit
Committee Report) and143
(Critical accounting estimates
and assumptions – Impairment
of property, plant and equipment
and right-of-use assets). ScS
Group plc has 100 ScS-branded
stores at year end (2022: 99
stores). The directors are required
to consider if there has been any
indicators of impairment on a
store by store basis. Where there
is an indicator of impairment in
a store’s value, management
test the carrying value of assets
by reference to the future
discounted cash flows that the
store is expected to generate. For
the year ended 29 July 2023 ScS
has recorded impairment of £2.4m
(2022: £nil).There are a number
of judgements and estimates
involved in the impairment of
assetcalculation,including
forecasting of future results,
length of leases, allocation of
costs and use of an appropriate
discount rate. As such, the
judgements and estimates
involved in the impairment of
asset calculation were an area of
focus for our audit.
• We obtained the impairment workings from management
and checked theirarithmetical accuracy.
• We have agreed the inputs to the workings to board
approved budgets.
• We agreed the allocation of fixed assets on a sample basis
by vouching to invoice for any new additions and fixed asset
register for owned assets.
• We assessed the store by store allocation of revenue and
direct costs for reasonableness by comparing to previous
year actuals.
• We agreed that central costs had been allocated on a
reasonable basis to the underlying stores, and all material
costs had been allocated on a reasonable basis to the
underlying stores, and all material costs have been
allocated.
• We agreed that the rental charge was correctly excluded
from the stores cash flows.
There were no issues noted with the underlying data used in
calculating the impairment provision.
Management’s assessment of which stores were at risk
of impairment were based on the forecasted future
performance of individual stores in the group’s portfolio.
• We agreed the FY24 forecasted results used in the asset
impairment calculation were consistent with board
approved budgets.
• We assessed the reasonableness of the assumptions
used in the calculation and performed sensitivities
where appropriate. This included, but was not limited to,
assessment of discount rate and store growth rates with
reference to macro-economic and industry predictions.
We concluded that the level of impairment of fixed assets
and right of use assets in the store portfolio was materially
correct.
• We have assessed the completeness and accuracy of the
related disclosures within the financial statements.
We are satisfied the assumptions made by management
in determining the asset carrying value and the related
disclosures in the financial statements are appropriate.
Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Carrying value of investment
(parent)
Refer to pages 93 (Audit
Committee Report) and158
(Critical accounting estimates
and assumptions – carrying value
of investments). ScS Group plc
(parent) has a £70.0m investment
balance held on the company’s
balance sheet and as at the
date of our testing the market
capitalisation of the group was
below the carrying value of
the investment. Management
concluded that this was an
impairment trigger and therefore
have prepared an assessment of
the recoverable amount of the
investment. There are a number
of judgements and estimates
involved in the assessment,
including assessmentofmarket
capitalisation andcontrol
premiums, and assessment of
the group’s discounted cash
flows. As such, the judgements
and estimates involved in the
assessment were an area of
focus for our audit.
• We agreed with management’s assessment that there
was an impairment trigger based on market capitalisation
being lower than the carrying value of investments.
• We obtained management’s impairment assessment
which included an analysis of the market capitalisation of
the group and an assessment of the group’s discounted
cash flows.
• We have reviewed management’s paper and assessed
management’s use of the market capitalisation and
control premium judgements to support the investment
value.
• We have also obtained the discounted cash flow model,
tested the inputs to the model by assessing forecast
cash flows through comparing these to board approved
budgets. We tested the integrity of the model and its
mathematical accuracy.
• We assessed the reasonableness of the assumptions
used in the calculation and performed sensitivities where
appropriate.
• We have assessed the completeness and accuracy of
the related disclosures within the financial statements.
We are satisfied the assumptions made by management in
determining the asset impairment and the related disclosures
in the financial statements are appropriate.
How we tailored the audit scope
We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed enough work
to be able to give an opinion on the financial statements as a whole, taking into
account the structure of the group and the company, the accounting processes
and controls, and the industry in which they operate.
As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks
of material misstatement in the financial statements. In particular we looked
at where the directors made subjective judgements, for example in respect
of significant accounting estimates that involved making assumptions and
considering future events that are inherently uncertain. As in all of our audits we
also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including