
HOW WE TAILORED THE AUDIT SCOPE
We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure
that we performed enough work to be
able to give an opinion on the financial
statements as a whole, taking into account
the structure of the group and the company,
the accounting processes and controls, and
the industry in which they operate.
The Group financial statements involve a
consolidation of 16 reporting units, certain
of which are sub-consolidations of the
operations in each of the Group’s key
markets. The sub-consolidations were
deemed to be components for our audit
and comprise the Group’s three main
divisions: Southern Africa, Switzerland and
the Middle East. These components
required an audit of their complete
financial information due to their size.
In establishing the overall approach to the
Group audit, we determined the type of
work that needed to be performed at the
reporting units by us, as the Group audit
team, or by component auditors from other
PwC network firms. Where the work was
performed by component auditors, we
determined the level of involvement we
needed to have in the audit work at those
components to be able to conclude whether
sucient appropriate audit evidence had
been obtained as a basis for our opinion on
the Group financial statements as a whole.
We instructed, supervised and reviewed
the audit work of each of our component
audit teams in South Africa, Switzerland
and the Middle East, which included audit
work paper reviews, participation in key
audit discussions and in-person site visits
with local management and participation
in audit clearance meetings at each
component. We also maintained regular
dialogue with our component audit teams
at each key reporting unit.
Further specific audit procedures over the
Group consolidation, selected financial
statement line items reported by the
Company and over the Group’s associate
interest in Spire, and procedures over the
Annual Report and audit of the financial
statement disclosures were directly led by the
Group audit team.
Taken together, the component audit work,
together with work performed at the Group
level, accounted for 94% of consolidated
revenue, 93% of consolidated profit before
tax and 93% of consolidated adjusted profit
before tax calculated on an absolute basis.
As part of the audit, we inquired of
management to understand and evaluate the
Group’s risk assessment process in relation to
climate change. We used our knowledge of
the Group, and we engaged with our divisional
component teams and our climate change
experts to support our evaluation of the risk
assessment performed by management.
We further challenged management on
how they considered the Group’s 2030
carbon neutrality and zero waste to landfill
commitments in their assessment. We
assessed that the key financial statement line
items and estimates which are more likely to
be materially impacted by climate change are
those areas that are based on future cash
flows. As a result, we particularly considered
how climate change risks and the impact of
climate commitments made by the Group
would impact the assumptions made in the
forecasts prepared by management that are
used in the Company’s impairment analysis.
Our procedures did not identify any material
impacts on our key audit matters for the year
ended 31 March 2022. We also reviewed the
disclosures included in the TCFD Report of
the Annual Report and we considered the
consistency of these disclosures with the
relevant financial statement disclosures,
including in note 14, and with our
understanding of the business.
MATERIALITY
The scope of our audit was influenced
by our application of materiality. We set
certain quantitative thresholds for
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
- GROUP
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
- COMPANY
Overall
materiality
£11.5 million (2021: £10.8 million). £33.8 million (2021: £33.0 million).
How we
determined
it
5% of the consolidated adjusted
profit before tax (2021: 5% of the
average three year consolidated
adjusted profit before tax)
1% of total assets
Rationale for
benchmark
applied
We believe that adjusted profit
before tax is the primary
measure used by the
shareholders in assessing the
performance of the Group.
The adjusted profit before tax
measure removes the impact of
significant items which do not
recur from year to year or which
otherwise significantly aect the
underlying trend of performance
from continuing operations.
This is the metric against which
the performance of the Group
is most commonly assessed by
management and reported to
shareholders. We chose 5%,
which is consistent with the
quantitative materiality
thresholds used for profit-
oriented companies in this sector.
Mediclinic International plc is the
ultimate parent company which holds
the Group’s investments. Therefore,
the entity is not in itself profit oriented.
The strength of the balance sheet is
the key measure of financial health
that is important to shareholders, since
the primary concern for the Company
is the payment of dividends. Using a
benchmark of total assets is therefore
most appropriate. For 2022 and 2021,
selected financial statement line items
related to cash and equity of the
Company are included in the scope
of the Group audit and were audited
to a lower capped materiality of
£10.3 million (2021: £9.7 million).
However, we determined that the
Company did not require a full scope
audit of its complete financial information
for the purposes of the Group audit.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT CONTINUED
materiality. These, together with
qualitative considerations, helped us to
determine the scope of our audit and the
nature, timing and extent of our audit
procedures on the individual financial
statement line items and disclosures and
in evaluating the eect of misstatements,
both individually and in aggregate on the
financial statements as a whole.
Based on our professional judgement, we
determined materiality for the financial
statements as a whole as follows:
MEDICLINIC INTERNATIONAL PLC 2022 ANNUAL REPORT176