
42
satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such
internal control as the directors determine is necessary
to enable the preparation of financial statements that are
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud
or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors
are responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable,
matters related to going concern and using the going
concern basis of accounting unless the directors either
intend to liquidate the Company or to cease operations,
or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES FOR
THE AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements as a whole
are free from material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that
includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high
level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit
conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always
detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are
considered material if, individually or in aggregate,
they could reasonably be expected to influence the
economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these
financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the
financial statements is located on the FRC’s website
at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities . This
description forms part of our auditor’s report.
EXTENT TO WHICH THE AUDIT
WAS CONSIDERED CAPABLE OF
DETECTING IRREGULARITIES,
INCLUDING FRAUD
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-
compliance with laws and regulations. We design
procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined
above, to detect material misstatements in respect of
irregularities, including fraud.
These audit procedures were designed to provide
reasonable assurance that the financial statements
were free from fraud or error. The risk of not detecting
a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than
the risk of not detecting one resulting from error
and detecting irregularities that result from fraud is
inherently more difficult than detecting those that result
from error, as fraud may involve collusion, deliberate
concealment, forgery or intentional misrepresentations.
Also, the further removed non-compliance with laws
and regulations is from events and transactions reflected
in the financial statements, the less likely we would
become aware of it.
IDENTIFYING AND ASSESSING
POTENTIAL RISKS ARISING FROM
IRREGULARITIES, INCLUDING
FRAUD
The extent of the procedures undertaken to identify
and assess the risks of material misstatement in respect
of irregularities, including fraud, included the following:
• We considered the nature of the industry and
sector the control environment, business
performance including remuneration policies
and the Company’s own risk assessment that
irregularities might occur as a result of fraud or
error. From our sector experience and through
discussion with the directors, we obtained
an understanding of the legal and regulatory
frameworks applicable to the Company focusing
on laws and regulations that could reasonably be
expected to have a direct material effect on the
financial statements, such as provisions of the
Companies Act 2006, UK tax legislation or those
that had a fundamental effect on the operations
of the Company.
• We enquired of the directors and management
concerning the Company’s policies and
procedures relating to:
- identifying, evaluating and complying with the
laws and regulations and whether they were
aware of any instances of non-compliance;
- detecting and responding to the risks of fraud
and whether they had any knowledge of actual
or suspected fraud; and
- the internal controls established to mitigate risks
related to fraud or non-compliance with laws
and regulations.
• We assessed the susceptibility of the Company’s
financial statements to material misstatement,
including how fraud might occur by evaluating
management’s incentives and opportunities for
manipulation of the financial statements. This
included utilising the spectrum of inherent risk
and an evaluation of the risk of management
override of controls. We determined that
the principal risks were related to posting
inappropriate journal entries to increase revenue
or reduce costs, creating fictitious transactions to