
ODYSSEAN INVESTMENT TRUST PLC
68
2. Key audit matters: our assessment of risks of material misstatement
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in the audit of the financial
statements and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by us,
including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the
efforts of the engagement team. We summarise below the key audit matter (unchanged from 2021), in arriving at our audit opinion
above, together with our key audit procedures to address this matter and, as required for public interest entities, our results from
those procedures. This matter was addressed, and our results are based on procedures undertaken, in the context of, and solely for the
purpose of, our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and consequently are incidental to that
opinion, and we do not provide a separate opinion on this matter.
The risk Our response
Carrying amount of quoted
investments
(£155m; (2021: £109m))
Refer to page 58 (Audit Committee
Report), page 77 (accounting policy)
and page 85 and 86 (financial
disclosures).
Low risk, high value:
The Company’s portfolio of quoted
investments makes up 97% (2021: 87%)
of the Company’s total assets by value
and is considered to be one of the key
drivers of results. We do not consider these
investments to be at a high risk of significant
misstatement, or to be subject to a significant
level of judgement because they comprise
liquid, quoted investments. However, due to
their materiality in the context of the financial
statements as a whole, they are considered
to be one of the areas which had the
greatest effect on our overall audit strategy
and allocation of resources in planning and
completing our audit.
We performed the detailed tests below rather
than seeking to rely on any of the Company’s
controls, because the nature of the balance
is such that we would expect to obtain audit
evidence primarily through the detailed
procedures described below.
Our procedures included:
Tests of detail: Agreeing the valuation of
100% of quoted investments in the portfolio
to externally quoted prices; and
Enquiry of custodians: Agreeing 100%
of investment holdings in the portfolio
to independently received third party
confirmations from investment custodians.
Our findings: We found the carrying amount
of quoted investments to be acceptable
(2021: acceptable).
3. Our application of Company materiality and
an overview of the scope of our audit
Materiality for the financial statements as a whole was set
at £1.6m (2021: £1.25m), determined with reference to a
benchmark of total assets, of which it represents 1% (2021: 1%).
In line with our audit methodology, our procedures on
individual account balances and disclosures were performed
to a lower threshold, performance materiality, so as to reduce
to an acceptable level the risk that individually immaterial
misstatements in individual account balances add up to a
material amount across the financial statements as a whole.
Performance materiality was set at 75% (2021: 75%) of
materiality for the financial statements as a whole, which
equates to £1.2m (2021: £0.94m). We applied this percentage
in our determination of performance materiality because we did
not identify any factors indicating an elevated level of risk.
The risk Our response
Carrying amount of quoted
investments
(£155m; (2021: £109m))
Refer to page 58 (Audit
Committee Report), page 77
(accounting policy) and page 85
and 86 (financial disclosures).
Low risk, high value
The Company’s portfolio of quoted
investments makes up 97% (2021: 87%) of
the Company’s total assets by value and is
considered to be one of the key drivers of
results. We do not consider these
investments to be at a high risk of
significant misstatement, or to be subject to
a significant level of judgement because
they comprise liquid, quoted investments.
However, due to their materiality in the
context of the financial st
atements as a
whole, they are considered to be one of the
areas which had the greatest effect on our
overall audit strategy and allocation of
resources in planning and completing our
audit.
e performed the detailed tests below rather
han seeking to rely on any of the Company’s
ontrols, because the nature of the balance is
uch that we would expect to obtain audit
vidence primarily through the detailed
rocedures described below.
r procedures included:
Tests of detail: Agreeing the valuation of
100% of quoted investments in the
portfolio to externally quoted prices; and
Enquiry of custodians: Agreeing 100% of
investment holdings in the portfolio to
independently received third party
confirmations from investment custodians.
Our findings
We found the carrying amount of
quoted investments to be
acceptable (2021: acceptable).
3. Our application of materiality and an
overview of the scope of our audit
Materiality for the financial statements as a whole was set
at £1.6m (2021: £1.25m), determined with reference to a
benchmark of total assets, of which
it represents 1%
(2021: 1%).
In line with our audit methodology, our procedures on
individual account balances and disclosures were
performed to a lower threshold, performance materiality,
so as to reduce to an acceptable level the risk that
individually immaterial misstatements in individual account
balances add up to a material amount across the financial
statements as a whole. Performance materiality was set at
75% (2021: 75%) of materiality for the financial
statements as a whole, which equates to £1.2m (2021:
£0.94m). We applied this percentage in our determination
of performance materiality because we did
not identify any
factors indicating an elevated level of risk.
Total Assets
£160.97m (2021: £125.1m)
Materiality
£1.6m (2021: £1.25m)
.6m
hole financial
tatements materiality
1.2m
erformance materiality
2021: £0.94m)
80k
isstatements reported to the
udit committee (2021: £63k)
Materiality
Total assets
We agreed to report to the Audit Committee any
corrected or uncorrected identified misstatements
exceeding £80k (2021: £63k), in addition to other
identified misstatements that warranted reporting on
qualitative grounds.
Our audit of the Company was undertaken to the
materiality level specified above and was performed by a
single audit team.
The scope of the audit work was fully substantive as we
did not rely upon the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
2. Key audit matters: our assessment of risks of material misstatement
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in the audit of the financial
statements and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by
us, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; and
directing the efforts of the engagement team. We summarise below the key audit matter (unchanged from 2021), in arriving at
our audit opinion above, together with our key audit procedures to address this matter and, as required for public interest
entities, our results from those procedures. This matter was addressed, and our results are based on procedures undertaken, in
the context
of, and solely for the purpose of, our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion
thereon, and consequently are incidental to that opinion, and we do not provide a separate opinion on this matter.
We agreed to report to the Audit Committee any corrected
or uncorrected identified misstatements exceeding £80k
(2021: £63k), in addition to other identified misstatements that
warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.
Our audit of the Company was undertaken to the materiality
level specified above and was performed by a single audit team.
The scope of the audit work was fully substantive as we did not
rely upon the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.