
47
Responsibilities of Directors
As explained more fully in the Directors’
responsibilities statement, the Directors are
responsible for the preparation of the financial
statements and for being satisfied that they give a
true and fair view, and for such internal control as
the Directors determine is necessary to enable the
preparation of financial statements that are free
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud
or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors
are responsible for assessing the Company’s ability
to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern and
using the going concern basis of accounting unless
the Directors either intend to liquidate the Company
or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative
but to do so.
Auditor responsibilities for the audit of the
financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements as a whole
are free from material misstatement, whether due
to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report
that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is
a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that
an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will
always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are
considered material if, individually or in aggregate,
they could reasonably be expected to influence the
economic decisions of users taken on the basis of
these financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the
financial statements is located on the FRC’s website
at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This
description forms part of our auditor’s report.
Extent to which the audit was considered
capable of detecting irregularities, including
fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of
non-compliance with laws and regulations. We
design procedures in line with our responsibilities,
outlined above, to detect material misstatements
in respect of irregularities, including fraud.
These audit procedures were designed to
provide reasonable assurance that the financial
statements were free from fraud or error. The risk
of not detecting a material misstatement due to
fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one
resulting from error and detecting irregularities
that result from fraud is inherently more difficult
than detecting those that result from error, as fraud
may involve collusion, deliberate concealment,
forgery or intentional misrepresentations. Also, the
further removed non-compliance with laws and
regulations is from events and transactions reflected
in the financial statements, the less likely we would
become aware of it.
Identifying and assessing potential risks arising
from irregularities, including fraud
The extent of the procedures undertaken to identify
and assess the risks of material misstatement in
respect of irregularities, including fraud, included
the following:
• We considered the nature of the industry
and sector, the control environment, business
performance including remuneration policies
and the Company’s own risk assessment
that irregularities might occur as a result of
fraud or error. From our sector experience
and through discussion with the directors,
we obtained an understanding of the legal
and regulatory frameworks applicable to the
Company focusing on laws and regulations that
could reasonably be expected to have a direct
material effect on the financial statements,
such as provisions of the Companies Act 2006,
the FCA listing and DTR rules, the principles of
the UK Corporate Governance Code, industry
practice represented by the Statement of
Recommended Practice: Financial Statements
of Investment Trust Companies and Venture
Capital Trusts (“the SORP”) and updated in
July 2022 with consequential amendments
and the applicable financial reporting
framework. We also considered the Company’s
qualification as VCT under UK tax legislation.
• We enquired with the directors and
management concerning the Company’s
policies and procedures relating to:
– identifying, evaluating and complying with the
laws and regulations and whether they were
aware of any instances of non-compliance;
– detecting and responding to the risks of fraud
and whether they had any knowledge of actual
or suspected fraud; and
– the internal controls established to mitigate risks
related to fraud or non-compliance with laws
and regulations.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT > CONTINUED