213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532024-01-012024-12-31213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMemberiso4217:GBP213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:CapitalReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532023-01-012023-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532023-01-012023-12-31ifrs-full:CapitalReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532023-01-012023-12-31iso4217:GBPxbrli:shares213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532024-12-31213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532023-12-31xbrli:shares213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532023-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532023-12-31ifrs-full:CapitalRedemptionReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532023-12-31aquilaenergyefficiencytrustplc:SpecialReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532023-12-31ifrs-full:CapitalReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532023-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:CapitalRedemptionReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532024-01-012024-12-31aquilaenergyefficiencytrustplc:SpecialReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:CapitalReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532024-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532024-12-31ifrs-full:CapitalRedemptionReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532024-12-31aquilaenergyefficiencytrustplc:SpecialReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532024-12-31ifrs-full:CapitalReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532024-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532022-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532022-12-31ifrs-full:CapitalRedemptionReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532022-12-31aquilaenergyefficiencytrustplc:SpecialReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532022-12-31ifrs-full:CapitalReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532022-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532022-12-31213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532023-01-012023-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532023-01-012023-12-31ifrs-full:CapitalRedemptionReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532023-01-012023-12-31aquilaenergyefficiencytrustplc:SpecialReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532023-01-012023-12-31ifrs-full:CapitalReserveMember213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC532023-01-012023-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember
AQUILA ENERGY EFFICIENCY TRUST PLC
ANNUAL REPORT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024
© 2024 AEET | A
INVESTING WITH IMPACT
AQUILA ENERGY EFFICIENCY TRUST PLC
ANNUAL REPORT 2024
For more information please contact:
Aquila Group
Valentinskamp 70
20355 Hamburg
Germany
Tel.: +49 (0)40 87 50 50-100
Email: info@aquila-capital.com
Web: www.aquila-capital.com
Follow us on
Hamburg · Frankfurt · London · Luxembourg · Madrid · Oslo · Zurich · Invercargill · Singapore · Tokyo
Important Notice: This document serves informational purposes only. It constitutes neither an investment advice, an investment service nor the
invitation to make offers or any declaration of intent; the contents of this document also do not constitute a recommendation for any other
actions. The validity of the provided information is limited to the date of preparation of this document and may change at any time for various
reasons, especially the market development. The sources of information are considered reliable and accurate, however we do not guarantee the
validity and the actuality of the provided information and disclaim all liability for any damages that may arise from the use of the information.
Historical information cannot be understood as a guarantee for future earnings. Predictions concerning future developments only represent
forecasts. Statements to future economic growth depend on historical data and objective methods of calculation and must be interpreted as
forecasts. No assurances or warranties are given, that any indicative performance or return will be achieved in the future. The terms Aquila
and Aquila Capital comprise companies for alternative and real asset investments as well as sales, fund-management and service companies
of Aquila Group (“Aquila Group” meaning Aquila Capital Holding GmbH and its affiliates in the sense of sec. 15 et seq. of the German Stock
Corporation Act (AktG)). The respective responsible legal entities of Aquila Group that offer products or services to (potential) investors/
customers, are named in the corresponding agreements, sales documents or other product information.
A publication of Aquila Capital Investmentgesellschaft mbH. As at 28 April 2025
Read more about our
commitment to sustainability
www.aquila-capital.de/esg/
AEET | ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024
© 2024 AEET | 99
INVESTING WITH IMPACT
ANNUAL REPORT 2024
Directors (all non-executive)
Miriam Greenwood OBE DL (Chair)
Nicholas Bliss
David Fletcher
Janine Freeman
Registered office
(Registered in England and Wales with
Company number. 13324616)
4th Floor
140 Aldersgate Street
London
England
EC1A 4HY
AIFM
FundRock Management Company (Guernsey) Limited
Sarnia House
Le Truchot
St Peter Port
Guernsey
GY1 1GR
Investment Adviser
Aquila Capital Investmentgesellschaft mbH
Valentinskamp 70
D-20335
Hamburg
Germany
Broker
Stifel Nicolaus Europe Limited
150 Cheapside
London
EC2V 6ET
Administrator and Company Secretary
Apex Listed Companies Services (UK) Limited
4th Floor, 140 Aldersgate Street
London
England
EC1A 4HY
Registrar
Computershare Investor Services PLC
The Pavilions
Bridgwater Road
Bristol
BS99 6AH
Independent Auditors
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
7 More London Riverside
London
SE1 2RT
COMPANY INFORMATION
Contents
Your Company at a Glance ...........................3
Highlights.........................................3
STRATEGIC REPORT
Chair’s Statement ..................................4
Investment Adviser’s Report ..........................6
Environmental, Social and Governance ................13
Investment Policy .................................16
Key Performance Indicators .........................18
Risk Management .................................19
Section 172 Report ................................24
Other information .................................26
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Report ..................................28
Corporate Governance Statement.....................34
Directors’ Remuneration Report ......................43
Report of the Audit and Risk Committee ...............48
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities ...............51
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Independent Auditors’ Report .......................52
Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and
Comprehensive Income .............................60
Company Statement of Profit or Loss and
Comprehensive Income .............................61
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position ...........62
Company Statement of Financial Position ..............63
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity ...........64
Company Statement of Changes in Equity ..............65
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows ................66
Company Statement of Cash Flows....................67
Notes to the Financial Statements ....................68
OTHER INFORMATION
Alternative Performance Measures ...................92
Glossary .........................................93
Annex I - Article 8 Periodic Disclosures ................95
Company Information ..............................99
For more information please visit our website
www.aquila-energy-efficiency-trust.com
YOUR COMPANY AT A GLANCE
Investment Objective
FOLLOWING THE ADOPTION OF A NEW INVESTMENT POLICY AT THE 2023 AGM,
AQUILA ENERGY EFFICIENCY TRUST PLC IS BEING MANAGED WITH THE INTENTION
OF REALISING ALL REMAINING ASSETS IN THE PORTFOLIO IN A PRUDENT MANNER
CONSISTENT WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF GOOD INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND
WITH A VIEW TO RETURNING CASH TO SHAREHOLDERS IN AN ORDERLY MANNER.
© 2024 AEET | 3
Management
The Company has appointed FundRock Management
Company (Guernsey) Limited as its Alternative Investment
Fund Manager (AIFM”) to provide portfolio and risk
management services. The AIFM is part of the Apex Group.
The AIFM has appointed Aquila Capital Investmentgesellschaft
mbH as its Investment Adviser (Aquila Capital” or
“Investment Adviser”). The Investment Adviser is part of the
Aquila Group, which was founded in 2001. Since its inception
it has undertaken a range of advisory mandates, mostly
focused on renewable energy infrastructure, including energy
efficiency.
The Board comprises four non-executive Directors, all of
whom are independent of the Investment Adviser, from
relevant and complementary backgrounds offering
experience in the management of listed funds, as well as
in the energy efficiency and infrastructure sectors.
Capital Structure
As at 31 December 2024, the Company’s share capital
comprised 81,438,268 ordinary shares of £0.01 each
(“Ordinary Shares”) (31 December 2023: 100,000,000).
The Ordinary Shares are admitted to trading on the Main
Market of the London Stock Exchange.
Highlights (Consolidated figures)
Financial information
As at
31 December
2024
As at
31 December
2023
NAV per Ordinary Share (pence) 85.55 94.28
Ordinary Share price (pence) 52.00 57.25
Ordinary Share price discount to
NAV
1
(%)
(39.2) (39.3)
Dividend per Ordinary Share
(pence)
2
6.139
Net assets (£ million) 69.67 94.28
Ongoing charges
1
(%) 3.8 3.5
Performance summary
For the year
ended
31 December
2024
% change
For the year
ended
31 December
2023
% change
NAV total return per Ordinary
Share
1,3
(2.7) 0.3
Share price total return per
Ordinary Share
1,3
1.6 (17.6)
1 Alternative Performance Measures (“APMs”), as defined by the European and Markets Authority. Definitions of APMs, and other terms used in the report, are given on page 92
together with supporting calculations where appropriate.
2 Dividend declared and paid in respect of the financial year.
3 Adjusted for dividends paid during the financial year.
CHAIR’S STATEMENT
Investment Performance
The Company’s NAV per share as at 31 December 2024
was 85.55p (2023: 94.28p), representing a decrease of
9.3% which, amongst other things, reflects the payment
of a dividend of 6.139 pence per ordinary share on
1November 2024 as part of the return of capital to s. The
Company’s shares continued to trade at a significant
discount to NAV over the period. The NAV total return,
which includes an adjustment for the dividend paid,
amounted to a negative 2.7% return. As discussed in
previous Statements, the focus has been on maximising
value for the return of capital to Shareholders. This has
meant working on withdrawing from pre-existing
commitments where legally possible, negotiating exits to
achieve acceptable realisations and only advancing
commitments of further capital where legally committed
to do so. The results of this are further detailed in the
Investment Advisers report.
The Groups investments continue to produce income. In
2024, total investment income was £5.4 million, a decrease
of £0.6 million versus the previous year and net revenue
loss was £0.2 million (2023: £0.9 million profit). In the
same period, investment income from investments was
£4.7 million compared to £5.0 million in the previous year,
a decrease of £0.3 million, which was largely attributable
to lower investment income from the Companys Superbonus
investments in Italy. The Superbonus investments are
described in further detail in the Investment Adviser’s
Report on pages 8 to 9 of this Annual Report. In the same
period, interest income from cash deposits was £0.7 million
compared to £0.9 million in the previous year, a decrease
of £0.2 million as a consequence of the lower level of
average cash balances held during the period following
the return of capital referred to.
In line with the Company’s investment policy, on 31December
2024, £53.3 million of the Company’s investments of
£56.3 million were denominated in Euros. Information on
the Company’s continued use of forward foreign exchange
agreements to hedge the value of the Euro-denominated
investments can be found on page 7 in the Investment
Adviser’s report.
Following an extensive asset sale process run on behalf
of the Company, by its financial advisors, and which ended
in February 2024, the Board has continued to seek and
assess opportunities to realise capital through the sale of
assets. This remains challenging. As discussed in previous
reports, the portfolio consists of assets that are geographically
diverse, small in size, contractually complex and many
have lengthy maturities of between ten to eighteen years.
Furthermore, because of the Managed Run-Off status of
the Company, additional complexities have arisen around
the realisation of and protection of value in the Company’s
assets. Our counterparties on some of these investments
are aware of the Managed Run-Off position of the
Company, and it appears that this is potentially placing
us at a disadvantage in certain negotiations/relationships.
The Board remains actively involved in negotiating terms
to protect the value in the portfolio and continues to work
actively with its financial and legal advisers on seeking
alternative ways to deliver the return of capital to our
Shareholders.
Return of Capital
On 6 March 2024, the Company announced that it
intended to return capital to Shareholders by way of a
Tender Offer to ordinary Shareholders of up to 18,561,732
ordinary shares for a maximum aggregate cash consideration
of £17.5 million. This entitlement to tender was undertaken
at a price of 94.28p, the Company’s NAV per share at
31December 2023. The Tender Offer was launched on
19 April 2024 and the result of the Tender Offer was
announced on 13 May 2024; 90,231,121 shares were
validly tendered, and the requisite Special Resolution was
passed, resulting in the purchase by the Company of
18,561,732 shares, which was the maximum amount
possible under the terms of the Tender Offer.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD, I AM PLEASED TO PRESENT THE ANNUAL REPORT (THE
ANNUAL REPORT) FOR AQUILA ENERGY EFFICIENCY TRUST PLC, FOR THE YEAR
ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024.
4 | © 2024 AEET
The Board intends to continue returning capital to
Shareholders, either through the payment of dividends
or by means of Tender Offers as soon as sufficient realisation
proceeds are received. We have engaged with the majority
of our largest Shareholders who have expressed a preference
for returns of capital to occur in meaningful tranches, and
we will continue with that strategy, if appropriate. However,
if realisations are either delayed or it takes longer to make
sizeable returns of capital, the Board will still consider the
payment of dividends which provide a much more
cost-effective return of capital. As noted, a dividend of
6.139p per share was paid on 1 November 2024.
Significant Developments since 31 December 2024
In the 3 months ended 31 March 2025, proceeds of £23.8
million were realised from repayments:
n In January and February 2025, the Company received
£0.5 million and £7.0 million from a quarterly contractual
payment and full repayment, respectively, of the Bio-LNG
investment in Germany; and
n
In February and March 2025, three of the five Superbonus
investments were largely repaid realising proceeds of
£16.3 million. This represents repayment of the majority
of Superbonus investments in Italy.
The repayments of the Superbonus investments were
made after negotiation by two of the three developers of
these projects (the “ESCOs”), and not from proceeds
received from the purchasers of the tax credits generated
from these projects, which was the expected source of
repayment when these investments were initially made.
The return from the Superbonus projects was in two parts,
payments for the tax credits and an interest element
calculated by reference to the delay in receiving payment.
In order to mitigate the significant delayed interest cost,
which was being borne by ESCOs, a repayment plan was
proposed to reduce the impact of late payment interest
accruing on these investments. To accelerate the realisation
of these Superbonus investments, which has been significantly
slower than originally anticipated, the Company accepted
a modest discount of the full late payment interest due
on these investments. These investments achieved internal
rates of return of greater than 9% p.a.
The Board is in discussions whether an early repayment
plan for the two other Superbonus investments is feasible
and in Shareholders interests, taking into account the
contractual arrangements.
Costs
The Board continues to be very mindful of the costs
incurred in the running of the Company whilst it is in
Managed Run-Off. The unintended and unhelpful
consequences of the Managed Run-Off are numerous.
In particular, some investment counterparties and service
providers no longer have the same incentives and
motivation to cooperate with the Company and this is,
in some cases, leading to additional costs being incurred.
We will remain focused on cost recovery and reduction,
in particular, where additional costs have been incurred
as a consequence of underperformance of particular
services provision.
Return of Capital post year end
Given the recent substantial repayments of investments
and the accumulated cash position at 31 March 2025
of £36.4million, excluding £2.5 million cash held as
collateral for hedging, the Company will make a distribution
of £30 million as quickly and as cost-effectively as
practicable. The assets remaining after the realisations
referred to above and excluding the two Superbonus
investments, have an average life of 8.9 years. Currently,
no significant realisations are expected on a contractual
basis for several years.
The Board of Directors has declared a special interim
dividend of 36.837 pence per Ordinary Share in respect
of the first six months of the financial year ending
31December 2025 payable on 30 May 2025 to Shareholders
on the register on 9 May 2025. The ex-dividend date is
8 May 2025.
Miriam Greenwood OBE DL
Chair of the Board
28 April 2025
© 2024 AEET | 5
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
INVESTMENT ADVISER’S REPORT
Overview
During 2024, the Investment Adviser continued to support
the Managed Run-Off of the Company’s Portfolio by, (i)
limiting new investment activity to the execution of
commitments agreed up to the date of the continuation
vote in February 2023, (ii) the withdrawal from pre-existing
legally binding commitments where feasible on acceptable
terms, (iii) undertaking negotiations to achieve the realisation
of individual investments at acceptable terms before their
contracted maturity date, and (iv) the monitoring of
performance and addressing where necessary operating
performance and/or payment issues in the Company’s
Portfolio.
During 2024, the Company invested the second and final
tranches of two investments, a rooftop Solar PV project in
Italy with an investment of £0.4 million and a biogas
investment in Germany with an investment of £3.7 million.
These investments were completed in the first half of 2024
and no additional investments, except for transaction costs,
were made in the second half of 2024. The final tranche
of an investment for the Spanish building refurbishment
project was not required because it was offset against the
receipt of grant funding for this project. There now remains
only one small investment commitment, excluding sundry
investment costs, of less than £0.05 million to a UK
lightingproject.
During 2024, the Company realised two Solar PV investments
in Spain generating proceeds of £1.0 million. One of these
transactions enabled the Company to withdraw from an
existing commitment to invest £0.5 million in another solar
PV project in Spain. In February 2025, the Company
completed the sale of its Bio-LNG investment in Germany
at a small premium to book value of £7.4 million as at
31 December 2024. Total proceeds from this investment
in 2025 amounted to £7.5 million after taking account of
a scheduled cash receipt of £0.5 million in January 2025.
During 2024, the Company received £5.0 million of cash
from the Superbonus investments in Italy, which were
valued at £24.8 million as at 31 December 2024 (£30.9
million as at 31 December 2023). This amount was
substantially less than expected. However, as reported in
the Chairs Statement above, following negotiations with
two ESCOs, £16.3 million was received by the end of
March 2025, from the repayment of the majority of the
Superbonus investments.
The Investment Adviser is in discussions whether an early
repayment plan for the two remaining Superbonus investments
is feasible and in Shareholders’ interests, taking into account
the contractual position.
The Investment Adviser continues to closely monitor the
performance of all of the Company’s investments and, in
particular, the receipt of cash payments, which are due on
a monthly, quarterly and annual basis. In 2024, the large
majority of the Company’s other (i.e. non-Superbonus)
investments and, in particular, all of the larger investments,
performed in accordance with their contractual terms.
However, there are investments in the portfolio which
continue to be problematic:
n Two Solar PV investments in Spain, which were written
down as at 31 December 2024 to £0.4 million (£1.3million
as at 31 December 2023) because of operational difficulties
with individual projects, the failure of the ESCOs which
developed the projects to remedy these difficulties and
expected higher O&M costs from having to replace these
ESCOs.
n
The two wind investments in the UK, which were
written down to a value of £1.0 million as at
31 December 2024 (£1.9 million as at 31 December
2023), principally because of operational problems at
individual sites, which have resulted in lower than
expected electricity production and higher operational
and maintenance costs.
It has also been necessary in 2024 to make further provisions
of £0.8 million against three amortised cost investments,
taking these investment values to zero:
n
The German sub-metering investment, which had a
book value of £0.2 million as at 31 December 2023
versus cost of £1.7 million, was fully provided against
as at 30 June 2024 and 31 December 2024 because,
following the insolvency of the service provider in
October 2023, it now appears that any sale proceeds
from selling the sub-metering contracts are unlikely to
exceed tax and other liabilities of the SPV into which
the original investment was made.
6 | © 2024 AEET
n
The UK CHP investment, which had a book value of
£0.5million as at 31 December 2023 versus cost of
£1.0million, was reduced to a book value of zero because,
following the ESCO’s client, Vale of Mowbray, entering
into administration and subsequently liquidation, there
has been no significant progress to date with the new
owner of the site nor in securing a new customer for
the CHP equipment.
n
A Solar PV project in Spain, which had a book value of
£0.1 million as at 31 December 2023 versus cost of
£0.2 million, was also fully impaired as at 31December
2024. This investment, which comprised two Solar PV
installations, was developed and maintained by an
ESCO which entered into bankruptcy in 2024 and it
has not proved possible to secure a new O&M provider
to replace the ESCO on economic terms to protect the
value of the investment.
As at 31 December 2024, £53.3 million of the Company’s
total investments of £56.3 million were denominated in
Euros. During 2024, the Company continued to use forward
foreign exchange agreements to hedge the value of the
Euro denominated investments. In the year ended 31December
2024 the Company reported realised foreign exchange
gains of £3.5 million, receiving £3.6 million in cash upon
settlement of these forward foreign exchange agreements.
The Company continues to seek to hedge approximately
100% of the value of the Company’s Euro denominated
investments. The quantum of the forward foreign exchange
agreements is modified upon the rollover of the contracts,
which have maturities of between one and three months,
to reflect additional deployment and returns of capital and
changes in valuation. As at 8 April 2025, the Company had
entered into forward foreign exchange agreements in an
amount of £31.3 million following the significant repayment
of Euro denominated investments. £2.5million of the
Company’s cash balances continue to be held as security
by the bank providing the forward foreign exchange
contracts.
As at 31 December 2024, the Company’s cash position,
including cash held as collateral for foreign exchange
hedging, was £14.4 million. The cash position increased
significantly to £38.9 million as at 31 March 2025 because
of the repayments of the Bio-LNG investment in Germany
and the partial repayments of the Superbonus investments.
Portfolio Overview
As at 31 December 2024, the Company’s portfolio of 29
1
Energy Efficiency Investments was diversified across
geographies (Italy, Spain, Germany and the United Kingdom),
technologies, counterparties and ESCO partnerships.
The Company’s portfolio is characterised by projects with
(i) a low technology risk through the use of proven
technologies; (ii) medium to long-term contracts providing
for predictable cash flows; and (iii) counterparties with
good creditworthiness.
i) Projects by Technology
CHP
Wind
Lighting
Heating
Biogas / BioLNG
Solar PV
Water Management
Building Retrofit
0.7%
1.8%
2.8%
3.7%
13.2%
13.6%
16.1%
48.1%
% of investment values by technology – as of 31 December 2024
ii) Projects by Tenor
15-20
10-15
5-10
2-5
0-2
0.3%
12.1%
42.0%
1.5%
44.1%
% of investment values by maturity (years) – as of 31 December 2024
Years
1 Investments with a value of zero as at 31 December 2024 are excluded
© 2024 AEET | 7
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
iii) Projects by Country
Germany
Italy
Spain
United Kingdom
10.8%
32.9%
50.9%
5.4%
iv) Projects by Investment Grade
CCC/CC
BB-
BB+/BB
BBB+/BBB-
A-
AAA/AA-
0.5%
10.7%
5.2%
75.5%
0.4%
7.7%
% of investment values by credit rating – as of 31 December 2024
Approximately 84% of the Company’s investments by
value as at 31 December 2024 (72% as at 31 December
2023) had investment grade counterparties, as assessed
using either the Investment Adviser’s credit analysis or
external agencies. The increase in the percentage of
investment grade counterparties is mostly attributable to
an improvement in the credit rating of one of the ESCOs
managing two Superbonus investments from BB+/BB to
BBB+/BBB-. However, the percentage of the higher
investment grade ratings, i.e. above BBB+/BBB-, reduced
from 19% of the Company’s investments by value as at
31 December 2023 to 8% as at 31 December 2024. This
change was primarily due to a change in the credit rating
of the German Bio-LNG investment from A- to BBB+/BBB-.
As reported above, this project has now been realised.
For projects which are non-investment grade, there are
typically additional protections. These protections include
the ability to export power to the grid, and to extend the
maturity of a contract with the ESCO and the underlying
counterparty to recover missed payments. The latter is
possible because the Company’s financing agreements
are of a shorter duration than the useful life of equipment
installed and, in many cases, of a shorter duration than
the contract between the ESCO and the counterparty.
The credit quality and performance of the Company’s
portfolio is discussed further below in respect of valuations
and Expected Credit Loss (‘ECL’).
The Company’s portfolio comprises largely fixed return
cash flows. Following a renegotiation of the terms of the
German Bio-LNG investment, 95% of the total investment
value provides a fixed rate of return from contracted cash
flows (84% as at 31 December 2023). Approximately 5%
by investment value has variable cash flows linked to
power production and power prices, or inflation indexation.
In many cases, these variable return investments have
significant fixed income elements, for example feed-in
tariffs or fixed power prices in Power Purchase Agreements.
In addition, certain investments have downside protections,
for example, minimum contractual returns in order to
reduce the risk of lower than forecast cash flows.
The Company’s portfolio of investments is expected to
achieve an overall unlevered average return of 9.2% per
annum, an increase from the yield of 8.1% per annum
reported in the Half-Yearly Financial Report for the six
months ended 30 June 2024. The increase is mostly
attributable to reductions in the carrying value of the
Companys investments as at 31 December 2024.
Investments in Italy (£28.7 million value as at
31 December 2024)
In 2024, the Company invested £0.4 million to complete a
rooftop Solar PV project developed by Noleggio Energia,
with whom the Company has made seven investments. As
at 31 December 2024, total investment value in Italy was
£28.7 million across a total of 13 investments and there
were no outstanding investment commitments.
1) Investments in Italian “Superbonus” projects 24.9 million
value as at 31 December 2024)
In 2024, the Company received £5.0 million from the
Superbonus investments while no further capital was required
to be deployed. The ESCOs continued to experience delays
with final payments from the buyers of the tax credits.
However, in the three months ended 31 March 2025 the
Company received £16.3 million in substantial repayment
of three of the five Superbonus investments.
“Superbonus” is an incentive measure introduced by the
Italian Government through Decree “Rilancio Nr. 34” on
19 May 2020, which aimed to make residential buildings
(condominiums and single houses) more energy efficient
through improvements to thermal insulation and heating
systems. When qualifying measures were completed, ESCOs
delivering the measures were awarded a tax credit equal
to 110%
2
of the cost of the measures. These tax credits
INVESTMENT ADVISER’S REPORT
CONTINUED
2 The Italian Government has made various modifications to Superbonus, including the value of tax credits awarded and how these tax credits can be utilised.
8 | © 2024 AEET
can then be sold to banks, insurance companies and other
corporations and, thus, projects can be financed without
the need for a financial contribution from landlords. The
projects involve a range of energy efficiency measures
including insulation, the replacement of heating systems
with more efficient solutions and energy efficient windows.
2) Solar PV investments for self-consumption in Italy
(£3.8 million value as at 31 December 2024)
As at 31 December 2024, the Company had invested in
eight rooftop Solar PV projects with an aggregate capacity
of 5.1 MWp and a book value of £3.8 million. Following
completion of the final project in January 2024 with an
investment of £0.4 million, all of these projects are
operational and cash generative. These projects enable
companies to reduce their energy costs and CO
2
emissions
and avoid grid losses through the self-consumption of the
electricity produced.
2.i) Projects with Noleggio Energia
Of the eight Solar PV projects which the Company has
committed to finance, seven projects have been developed
by the ESCO Noleggio Energia, which was established in
2017 and is an Italian company that specialises in providing
operating leases for energy efficiency and renewable
energy projects for commercial and industrial clients in
Italy. These projects are all structured as the purchase of
receivables from operating leases with maturities of five
to ten years, with a remaining weighted average maturity
of 7.3 years outstanding, and all use very similar
documentation. Energia has paid the SPV the monthly
receivables from these operating lease agreements, which
provide for fixed rates of return with a weighted average
return of 8.4% per annum.
2.ii) Project with CO-VER Power Technologies
In January 2022, the Company refinanced the acquisition
of an existing rooftop Solar PV plant in Ascoli Piceno
(Central Italy) with a generating capacity of 902 kWp. The
investment, with an original cost of £0.7 million, is based
on the purchase of receivables generated by an energy
service contract between the leading Italian engineering
firm CO-VER Power Technologies (“CO-VER”) and its
subsidiary Futura APV S.r.l. (“Futura”). The contract governs
the management of an operating roof-mounted Solar PV
plant until April 2028. Thereafter, the investment is based
on a feed-in tariff for an additional six years, aggregating
to a twelve-year tenor. The investment, which generated
total cash receipts of £0.3 million in the period from
inception of the investment until 31 December 2024, is
forecast to generate a return of 8.4% per annum based
on the valuation as at 31 December 2024 of £0.58 million.
CO-VER has a successful 20-year history in developing
industrial projects in the areas of energy storage systems,
co/tri-generation plants and renewable energies. Futura
is the owner of the PV plant which benefits from feed-in
tariffs payable by Gestore dei Servizi Energetici (GSE).
GSE is a joint stock company managed by the Italian
Government which is responsible for promoting and
developing the growth of renewable assets in Italy. GSE
currently has a credit rating of BBB+ from the Italian
Government.
Investments in Spain (£6.1 million value as at
31 December 2024)
In 2024, the Company deployed no further capital into
investments in Spain, other than a small amount for
investment costs. As at 31 December 2024, total investment
value in Spain was £6.1 million across a total of six investments
and there were no outstanding investment commitments.
1) Solar PV investments in Spain (£3.8 million value as at
31 December 2024)
During 2024, the Company completed the sale of two
Solar PV projects, generating cash proceeds of £1.0 million.
As at 31 December 2024, the Company had capital invested
in five Solar PV installation projects throughout Spain with
five project developers. The largest project, with a value
of £2.8 million as at 31 December 2024 has been structured
to provide a fixed rate of return. The other four projects
have been structured under Power Purchase Agreements
(“PPAs”) with maturities of up to eighteen years and have
variable revenues, often subject to a combination of
production fluctuations, power price changes and inflation.
In addition, excess production beyond the on-site demand
may be injected into the grid. These variable revenue risks
are mitigated by conducting technical due diligence prior
to making commitments and by contracted prices within
the PPAs.
As reported earlier in the Investment Adviser’s Report,
there are operational issues with three Solar PV projects
in Spain, which were developed by ESCOs which have
entered into administration. These issues resulted in
negative fair value adjustments or impairments of £1.0 million
as at 31 December 2024 compared to the position as at
31 December 2023. In all of these cases, the Investment
Adviser has been seeking to exercise its legal rights including
its step in rights to procure a new ESCO to manage the
projects so that the PPAs can be maintained with the
counterparties.
© 2024 AEET | 9
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
INVESTMENT ADVISER’S REPORT
CONTINUED
2) Building Energy Efficiency Investments in Spain
(£2.3 million value as at 31 December 2024)
The Spanish Government has established incentive schemes
to promote energy efficiency measures in buildings, including
the “Programa de Rehabilitacion Energetica de Edificios”
(“PREE”). PREE is a €402.5 million incentive scheme in Spain
which is designed to promote and reward energy efficiency
improvements for condominiums and other buildings,
improving their energy rating by at least one energy class.
Under this scheme, the Company has invested £2.3 million
to fund the refurbishment of condominiums, which is being
managed by a leading ESCO specialised in designing and
implementing energy efficiency and renewable energy
projects in Spain. The investment cash flows, which are
expected to commence in the second quarter of 2025, are
based on the purchase of receivables generated by the
underlying energy saving contracts between the ESCO and
the “Comunidad de Proprietarios; the legal entities which
represent each of the owners of the apartments in a
residential building. The receivables have been rated with
the S&P equivalent of AAA/AA-.
Investments in Germany (£18.6 million value as
at 31 December 2024)
In 2024, the Company invested £3.7 million to complete
the financing of the installation of liquefaction equipment
at a biogas plant in Northern Germany. There are no
further investment commitments outstanding to investments
in Germany. Following the decision as at 30 June 2024
to provide in full against this sub-metering investment in
Germany, the Company has three investments across three
distinct technologies including water management solutions,
Bio-LNG and heat pumps.
All of the investments in Germany now provide for fixed
rates of return because in December 2024 the Company
agreed to modify the terms of the Bio-LNG investment
to take out the variable return element, which previously
provided for the right to receive 5% of revenue generated
by the project in addition to a fixed return of 5% per
annum on the capital invested, capped at £1.1 million
across eight years. The investment was therefore structured
to provide for a fixed rate of return of 8.5% per annum.
As reported earlier in the Investment Adviser’s Report, the
Company completed the sale of the Bio-LNG investment
in Germany in February 2025 at a small premium to the
net book value at 31 December 2024. The two other
investments with a book value of £11.1 million as at
31December 2024 are performing in line with their contracts.
Investments in the United Kingdom
(£3.0 million value as at 31 December 2024)
In 2024, the Company deployed no further capital into
investments in the United Kingdom. There remains,
however, a small commitment outstanding of less than
£0.05 million for lighting investments. In May 2024, one
of the CHP investments was realised through a refinancing
arranged by the ESCO which developed the project. The
realisation resulted in proceeds of £0.1 million, which was
equal to the book value at the date of realisation. As at
31 December 2024, the CHP investment with EGA Energy
was provided against in full, resulting in an impairment
cost in 2024 of £0.5 million. Seven investments remain
in the United Kingdom of which four are lighting, one is
CHP and two are in wind power.
The lighting and CHP investments are fixed return investments
although one of the lighting investments benefits from
annual inflation adjustments to the income. The wind
investments are variable return investments due to the
variability of operation and maintenance costs, power
production and export tariffs, which are renewed each
year, although a significant percentage of revenue is based
on feed-in tariffs which benefit from annual inflation
adjustments.
The fixed return investments performed satisfactorily.
However, the wind investments, which had a value of £1.9
million as at 31 December 2023, have been written down
to a value of £1.0 million as at 31 December 2024 due
primarily to operational problems at individual sites, which
have resulted in lower than expected electricity production
and higher operation and maintenance costs. In addition,
the ESCO has withheld payments due to the Company in
2024 because it has not generated sufficient income to
cover its operating costs. The Company is in negotiations
with the ESCO to restructure the wind investments.
Valuations and ECL Provisions as at
31December 2024
As at 31 December 2024, the Company’s investments had
a book value of £56.3 million, with investments held at
amortised cost valued at £46.3 million and investments
held at fair value through profit or loss valued at £10.0 million
(see Note 4 to the Accounts).
10 | © 2024 AEET
The investments held at amortised cost are net of ECL
provisions of £4.4 million, which increased by £2.5 million
from £1.9 million as at 31 December 2023, reflecting:
n
an increase for Superbonus investments to reflect the
credit risk moving to the ESCOs themselves rather than
the purchasers of the tax credits generated by these
investments; and
n
additional provisions against the three investments
which were fully impaired as at 31 December 2024.
Apart from these projects, the Company has not experienced
payment issues of material significance on the receivables
from amortised cost investments due to be paid to it in 2024.
As at 31 December 2024, the Company’s eight fair value
investments had a book value of £10.0 million and
comprised:
n
The German Bio-LNG investment with a value of
£7.4million;
n
four Solar PV projects in Spain with an aggregate value
of £1.0 million;
n
two wind projects in the United Kingdom with an
aggregate value of £1.0 million; and
n a Solar PV project in Italy with a value of £0.6 million.
The changes in fair value of these investments are summarised in the chart below.
31/12/2024
Business plan update
Change in discount rates
FX effect
Distributions to AEET
Valuation timing*
Price Curve/CPI
31/12/2023
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
-0.08%
7.10%
-10.08%
-3.69%
-3.71%
-11.92%
77.6%
100.00%
The change in valuation of the investments held at fair
value through profit or loss, as reported above, was
impacted primarily by operational issues with the wind
investments in the United Kingdom and Solar PV investments
in Spain:
n
The two wind investments in the UK, which had a value
of £1.9 million as at 31 December 2023, have been
marked down to a value of £1.0 million as at 31 December
2024 due primarily to operational problems at individual
sites, which have resulted in lower than expected
electricity production and higher operation and
maintenance costs.
n Two Solar PV investments in Spain, which had a value
of £1.3 million as at 31 December 2023, have been
marked down to a value of £0.4 million as at 31December
2024 due to operational difficulties with individual
projects and the failure of the ESCOs, who developed
the projects, which resulted in the need to introduce
new operational and maintenance service providers.
© 2024 AEET | 11
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
INVESTMENT ADVISER’S REPORT
CONTINUED
These operational issues have resulted in negative changes
to the forecast cash flows, referred to in the chart above
as business plan updates, and resulted in a negative change
of –11.9%. Other negative impacts on valuation were:
n
An overall increase in the discount rates applied to the
valuations, which had a negative effect of –3.7%
n FX effects, -3.7%;
n Distributions from these investments, -10.1%; and
n
Changes to forecast power price and inflation assumptions,
- 0.1%.
These impacts were offset by valuation timing, that is the
time value of money effect between the two valuation
dates, which had a positive effect of +7.1%. In addition,
the Company benefited from gains from forward foreign
exchange contracts which mitigated the negative FX
effects reported above.
Summary of Investments as at 31 December 2024
Description
Receivables
Weighted
Avg. Credit
Ratings
Term
Years Technology Status Country
Value
£k
Commitment
o/s
£k
Receivables (fixed) from sales of tax
credits generated under the Italian
Superbonus, which supports energy
efficiency retrofits of residential
buildings.
BB- 2 Building
Retrofit
Construction Italy 24,835
Subscription for Notes (fixed) entitling
the Note holder to receivables
generated through services
agreements for heat pump systems,
water management services and
sub-metering hardware and services in
Germany.
BBB+ / BBB- 9-15 Heat Pumps
Water
Management
Sub-meters
Default Germany 11,128
Subscription for a Note (fixed) for the
refinancing of an operating biogas
plant in north-eastern Germany and
an upgrade to a Bio-LNG facility.
BBB+ / BBB- 8 Biogas /
Bio-LNG
Operational Germany 7,423
Receivables (fixed/variable) from solar
PV plants and building refurbishment
projects in Spain.
BBB+ / BBB- 10 -18 Solar PV Operational Spain 6,098
Receivables (fixed/variable) from
Solar PV projects in Italy.
BBB+ / BBB- 7-10 Solar PV Operational Italy 3,826
Receivables (fixed/variable) from
wind, CHP, metering and lighting as a
service contracts in the UK.
BBB+ / BBB- 5-14 Wind
Lighting
CHP
Metering
Operational United
Kingdom
3,021 41
Notes:
The term is the original maturity of the investment.
12 | © 2024 AEET
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (“ESG”)
Introduction
The Company’s goal is to generate attractive returns for
investors by reducing Primary Energy Consumption (“PEC).
The Company seeks to achieve this through investing
principally in a diversified portfolio of energy efficiency
projects with high-quality counterparties. The Company’s
investments positively impact the environment by reducing
the amount of carbon dioxide produced, by decreasing
PEC and by increasing the amount of renewable energy
used. The synergies
3
generated by the reduction of PEC
and simultaneously using renewable energy sources further
decrease CO
2
emissions.
This is reflected across the investment philosophy and
approach of both the Company and its Investment Adviser,
Aquila Capital, who are dedicated to the green energy
transition. The Company is committed to being a responsible
investor, ensuring that environmental, social and governance
criteria are incorporated into day-to-day investment
decisions as well as generating a positive impact for society.
By reducing PEC, the Company often improves life standards
for end users; for example, better lights, easier maintenance,
reduced danger, security of supply and, very importantly,
the reduction of emissions like Nitrogen Oxides. In 2024,
the portfolio performed as follows:
n 5,285 tonnes of avoided CO
2
emissions (tCO
2
e”); and
n 19,581 MWh of energy saved,
n
for total emission savings equivalent to 2,312 passenger
flights around the world
4
.
Method of Calculation for Energy Savings
(kWh) and Avoided CO
2
Emissions (tCO
2
e)
The energy savings (in kWh) and avoided CO
2
emissions
(in tCO
2
e) are reported to Aquila Capital by third parties,
including the development companies, ESCOs and other
third parties. These reports are supported by asset-level
documentation of individual methodologies. Aquila Capital
has reviewed the individual methodologies for technical
consistency and reconciled the reported values for plausibility.
Where quantification of likely energy savings and avoided
CO
2
emissions is not clear, for example, with the Superbonus
projects in Italy and the Bio-LNG, water metering and
heat pump projects in Germany, no estimations are included
in the avoided CO
2
emissions and energy savings statistics
above.
Only energy savings and avoided CO
2
emissions for
operational projects are considered on a pro-rata basis
for the time of operation during the reporting period.
Avoided CO
2
emissions are estimated in gross terms and
derived from energy savings in kWh using a conversion
factor (except CHP, see below) which measures the grid’s
emission intensity. Emissions incurred during the life cycle
of light bulbs such as materials sourcing, manufacturing,
installation, maintenance etc. are not available. The reported
metrics are estimations based on assumptions. For technical
reasons, it is not possible or feasible to observe or measure
actual energy or emission avoidance in real-time.
n
LED/Lighting: Savings estimates are derived based on
technical, product-specific attributes provided by the
product manufacturer. Lighting assets are typically not
connected to a distinct circuit. These solutions are
designed according to the requirements of a given
functional unit, i.e. office, street or space, which varies
on asset level. Changes in the number of light bulbs or
lumen are not considered.
n
Solar PV: Electricity production is translated into
emissions avoidance with a conversion factor (see
above). Production estimates for Solar PV assets are
evaluated during technical due diligence processes.
n
CHP: Avoided CO
2
emissions are calculated directly by
comparing the assets emissions based on the feedstock
used for a specific plant with a reference co-generation
unit’s emission factor.
ESG Approach
The Company has adopted Aquila Capital’s ESG Integration
Policy
5
, ensuring that environmental, social and governance
criteria have been incorporated into day-to-day investment
decisions as well as generating a positive contribution
3 International Renewable Energy Agency (Irena), “Synergies between renewable energy and energy efficiency” (2017), available at: https://www.irena.org/publications/2017/
Aug/Synergies-between-enewable-energy-and-energy-efficiency#:~:text=Renewables%20would%20account%20for%20about,country%2C%20sector%20and%20
technology%20levels
4 Passenger flights around the world: This number is derived from passenger flight emissions data retrieved on 4 April 2023 from the International Civil Aviation Organization;
https://applications.icao.int/icec/Home/Index. The total emissions associated with a passenger flight around the world based on a standard itinerary from New York to Dubai,
Bangkok, Sydney, Los Angeles and back to New York in the economy class is 2,285.80 kg CO
2
.
5 For details please refer to: https://www.aquila-capital.de/fileadmin/user_upload/ESG_report/Aquila_Group_ESG_Integration_Policy.pdf
© 2024 AEET | 13
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (“ESG”)
CONTINUED
forsociety. The Company’s investment approach is focused
on investments in energy efficiency projects located
primarily in Europe. These investments are predominantly
into proven technologies that deliver energy savings for
commercial, industrial and public sector buildings. Prior
to the adoption of the New Investment Policy by Shareholders
in June 2023 the Company sought to invest in projects
for the long term with a focus on optimising and improving
the assets’ PEC (and, of course, the Company’s investments
continue to meet this initial objective). Technologies include:
n LED Lighting Systems;
n Solar PV;
n HVAC/Buildings; and
n Bio LNG.
Environmental Contribution
The Company’s investments are focused on reducing PEC,
which should lead to significant reductions in greenhouse
gas emissions. In addition, local production of energy
(CHP, biomass boilers, Solar PV) reduces transportation
energy losses and grid over-utilisation. Smart meters and
other control technologies enable a better visibility and
management of energy and therefore represent a basis
for energy savings.
Social Contribution
Energy efficiency measures not only reduce PEC, but
typically also have a positive impact on health and quality
of life for different stakeholders, such as employees and
users of public facilities. This is largely achieved through
the installation of advanced solutions for lighting, heating,
cooling, ventilation and the associated control units. All
project developers are required to adhere to local, regional
and national health and safety laws, to train and educate
employees accordingly, to make sure casualties and injuries
are avoided. Aquila Capital’s ESG Integration Policy, as
adopted by the Company, has sought to exclude suppliers
and manufacturers that do not meet Aquila Capital’s
criteria (exclusion of certain sectors/subsectors, or companies
that, for example, use unfavourable labour conditions).
For all counterparties, a rating has been performed (in
collaboration with a third-party rating agency) assessing
the creditworthiness of the relevant counterparty as well
as a “Know Your Client” check for the relevant parties
involved to increase transparency of the counterparties’
activities.
Governmental Contribution
The Company’s business partners are required to adhere
to the requirements of the relevant social security and tax
authorities. The Company’s business partners are required
to provide evidence that they adhere to anti-bribery and
corruption laws.
Due Diligence
The Investment Adviser performed detailed ESG due
diligence for each asset prior to investment. The investment
management team followed a structured screening, due
diligence and investment process designed to ensure that
investments are reviewed and compared on a consistent
basis. Execution of this process is facilitated by the team’s
deep experience in energy efficiency project investing. As
part of this process, the Investment Adviser, as relevant
for each investment, considered:
n
total PEC reduction, and implied CO
2
emissions reduced
and/or avoided; and/or
n
total energy production from renewable and
non-renewable sources.
Governance Framework
The Company has an independent Board of Directors,
with FundRock Management Company (Guernsey) Limited
as the AIFM. The Board of Directors supervises the AIFM,
which is responsible for making recommendations in
relation to any investment proposals put forward by the
Investment Adviser. The Investment Adviser is fully regulated
and supervised by BaFin in Germany. The Company
maintains a comprehensive risk register which is regularly
updated and reviewed by the AIFM and the Board of
Directors. The Company has established procedures to
deal with any potential conflicts of interest in circumstances
where Aquila Capital (or any affiliate) is advising both the
AIFM (for the Company) and other Aquila Capital managed
funds. In the context of an investment decision, these
procedures may include a fairness opinion in relation to
the valuation of an investment, which is obtained from
an independent expert.
14 | © 2024 AEET
Monitoring of ESG
The Company’s commitment to and compliance with the
Company’s established ESG approach is monitored on a
continuous basis throughout the lifecycle of investments,
as they become operational. This includes:
n
ongoing monitoring of the PEC based on the energy
consumption and deriving from that the CO
2
savings,
where appropriate, monitoring additional environment
and ESG relevant developments both at the portfolio
and asset level; and
n
annual reporting, including ESG aspects, to relevant
stakeholders including ad-hoc reporting of any material
and urgent issues identified in the monitoring process.
The Company has been awarded the Green Economy
Mark from the London Stock Exchange. The Green Economy
Mark identifies London-listed companies and funds that
generate between 50% and 100% of total annual revenues
from products and services that contribute to the global
green economy.
Aquila Capital Investmentgesellschaft mbH
28 April 2025
© 2024 AEET | 15
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
INVESTMENT POLICY
As at the date of this Annual Report, the Company’s investment
policy (including defined terms) is as adopted at the June
2023 AGM pursuant to the Continuation Managed Run-Off
Resolution, which replaced the previous investment objective
and policy in its entirety and is set out below.
The Company will be managed with the intention of
realising all remaining assets in the Portfolio in a prudent
manner consistent with the principles of good investment
management and with a view to returning cash to
Shareholders in an orderly manner.
The Company will pursue its investment objective by
effecting an orderly realisation of its assets in a manner
that seeks to achieve the best balance for Shareholders
between maximising the value received from those assets
and making timely returns of capital to Shareholders. This
process might include sales of individual assets, mainly
structured as loans/receivables, or groups of assets, or
running off the Portfolio in accordance with the existing
terms of the assets, or a combination.
The Company will cease to make any new investments or
to undertake capital expenditure except where, in the
opinion of both the Board and the Investment Adviser (or,
where relevant, the Investment Adviser’s successors):
n
the investment is a follow-on investment made in
connection with an existing asset in order to comply
with the Company’s pre-existing obligations; or
n
failure to make the follow-on investment may result in
a breach of contract or applicable law or regulation by
the Company; or
n
the investment is considered necessary to protect or
enhance the value of any existing investments or to
facilitate orderly disposals,
and in these circumstances the Company will observe the
following restrictions when making any such investments:
n
no more than 20 per cent. of its Gross Asset Value will
be invested in any single asset;
n
no more than 20 per cent. of its Gross Asset Value will
be invested in Energy Efficiency Investments with the
same Counterparty;
n no investments will be made outside of Europe; and
n
no more than 7.5 per cent. of its Gross Asset Value, in
aggregate, will be invested in Equity Investments, and
at all times such investments will only be made with
appropriate Shareholder protections in place.
Any cash received by the Company as part of the realisation
process prior to its distribution to Shareholders will be
held by the Company as cash on deposit and/or as
cashequivalents.
The Company will not undertake new borrowing.
As required by the UK Listing Rules, any material change
to the investment policy of the Company will be made
only with the approval of Shareholders by way of
ordinaryresolution.
Currency and Hedging
The Company does not use hedging or derivatives for
investment purposes. The functional currency of the
Company is sterling. With many of its investment assets
in euros the Company uses a series of regular forward
foreign exchange contracts to provide protection against
movements in the sterling exchange rate. Under these
arrangements the Company is required to provide £2.5million
in cash as collateral for these forward foreign exchange
contracts.
Cash Management
Cash held pending investment in Energy Efficiency
Investments or for working capital purposes will either be
held in cash or invested in cash, cash equivalents, near
cash instruments, bearer bonds and/or money market
instruments (Cash and Cash Equivalents). There is no
restriction on the amount of Cash and Cash Equivalents
that the Company may hold and there may be times when
it is appropriate for the Company to have a significant
Cash and Cash Equivalents position. For the avoidance of
doubt, the FCA’s restriction that not more than 15 per
cent. of the Gross Asset Value at the time an investment
is made will be invested in other closed-ended investment
funds which are listed on the Official List of the London
Stock Exchange, does not apply to money market typefunds.
16 | © 2024 AEET
Changes to and compliance with the Investment
Policy
As required by the Listing Rules, any material changes to the
Company’s Investment Policy as set out above will require
the approval of Shareholders by way of an ordinary resolution
at a general meeting and the approval of the FCA.
Compliance with the above restrictions will be measured
at the time of investment and non-compliance resulting
from changes in the price or value of assets following
investment will not be considered as a breach of the
investment restrictions.
In the event of a breach of the investment guidelines and
the investment restrictions set out above, the AIFM shall
inform the Board upon becoming aware of the same and
if the Board considers the breach to be material, notification
will be made to a Regulatory Information Service.
© 2024 AEET | 17
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Efficient Return of Capital
In line with the Managed Run-Off status of the Company,
the Board is focussed on the efficient return of capital to
Shareholders.
On 19 April 2024, the Company launched a Tender Offer
of up to 18,561,732 Ordinary Shares, representing
approximately 18.6 per cent. of the Company’s Issued
Ordinary Share Capital. Further to Shareholder approval
at the Company’s general meeting held on 13 May 2024,
90,231,121 Ordinary Shares were tendered and 18,561,732
Ordinary Shares were acquired at the Tender Price of
94.28pence per Ordinary Share, equating to £17.5 million
being returned to Shareholders, and then cancelled by
the Company.
As and when sufficient cash has been accumulated, the
Board’s intention is for there to be further distribution of
cash to Shareholders. However, if realisations are either
delayed or it takes longer to make sizeable returns of
capital, the Board will consider the payment of dividends.
The Company paid an interim dividend of 6.139p per
Ordinary Share, amounting to £5.0 million, to Shareholders
on 1 November 2024.
The Company has announced on 28 April 2025 the
intention to return a further £30.0
1
million by way of a
special interim dividend.
Discount of share price to NAV
The Board monitors the price of the Company’s shares in
relation to their NAV and the premium or discount at
which they trade. The share price closed at a 39.2%
discount to the NAV as at 31 December 2024. As at
25April 2025, the latest date prior to the publication of
the Annual Report, the share price discount to NAV
was25.4%.
Maintenance of a reasonable level of ongoing charges
The expenses of managing the Group are carefully monitored
by the Board. The Board receives and reviews management
accounts which contain an analysis of expenditure which
are reviewed at quarterly Board meetings. The Board
reviews the ongoing charges on a quarterly basis. Based
on the Groups average net assets during the year ended
31 December 2024, the Group’s ongoing charges figure
calculated in accordance with the AIC methodology was
3.8% (31 December 2023: 3.5%). Following the
announcement of a special interim dividend on 28 April2025
the Board is reviewing its cost structure to reduce the
costs in absolute terms to alevel more appropriate for a
company of its size.
THE BOARD MEASURES THE COMPANY’S SUCCESS IN ACHIEVING ITS
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE BY REFERENCE TO THE KEY PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS (KPIs) DESCRIBED BELOW:
1 The Board has announced a special interim dividend of 36.837p per share, payable on 30 May 2025, to Shareholders on the register on 9 May 2025. The ex-dividend date
is 8 May 2025.
18 | © 2024 AEET
RISK MANAGEMENT
Principal Risks and Uncertainties
During the year under review, the Company has carried
out a robust assessment of its principal and emerging risks
and the procedures in place to identify any emerging risks
are described below.
Procedures to identify principal or emerging risks:
The Board regularly reviews the Company’s risk matrix,
with a focus on ensuring that the appropriate controls are
in place to mitigate each risk. The experience and knowledge
of the Board is important, as is advice received from the
Board’s service providers, specifically the AIFM, which is
responsible for the risk and portfolio management services
and outsources the portfolio management to the Investment
Adviser. Each service provider has a role with respect to
the identification of risks:
1. Investment Adviser: the Investment Adviser submits a
quarterly report on the investment portfolio to the
Board which includes risks faced by the projects in the
portfolio, plus an update on hedging;
2. Alternative Investment Fund Manager: following advice
from the Investment Adviser and other service providers,
the AIFM maintains a register of identified risks including
emerging risks likely to impact the Company;
3. Broker: provides advice periodically specific to the
Company on the Company’s sector, competitors and
the investment company market whilst working with
the Board and Investment Adviser to communicate
with Shareholders;
4. Company Secretary: briefs the Board on forthcoming
legislation/regulatory change that might impact on the
Company; and
5. Association of Investment Companies (‘AIC’’): The
Company is a member of the AIC, which provides
regular technical updates as well as drawing members’
attention to forthcoming industry and regulatory issues.
Procedure for oversight
The Audit and Risk Committee undertakes a review at
least twice a year of the Company’s risk matrix and a
formal review of the risk procedures and controls in place
at the AIFM and other key service providers to ensure that
emerging (as well as known) risks are adequately identified
and, so far as is practicable, mitigated.
© 2024 AEET | 19
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
RISK MANAGEMENT
CONTINUED
Principal Risks
The Board considers the following to be the principal risks faced by the Company along with the potential impact of
these risks and the steps taken to mitigate them.
Portfolio
Principal Risks Potential Impact/Description Mitigation
Counterparty /
Credit
The risk that the Company has allocated funds to a
Counterparty that defaults on its obligations.
This could impact the financial performance of the
Company and its ability to meet dividends as well as
achieving its intended goals and returns for its investors.
The Company has sought to invest mostly, although not exclusively,
in projects where the counterparties have an investment grade or
near investment grade rating. The Investment Adviser uses third
party credit rating service providers to support its credit risk
assessments.
Continued monitoring of the investments and the associated
counterparties/service providers, including the use of credit rating
data providers, allows the Investment Adviser to identify and
address these risks early. The Investment Adviser seeks to mitigate
credit risks, for example, in the case of Solar PV investments, by
the counterparty having the opportunity to sell electricity to the
grid or other customers where possible. The Investment Adviser
also seeks to structure investments whereby contracts can be
adapted/extended to accommodate periods of payment defaults.
The Board closely scrutinises, on an asset specific basis, the fair
value calculations and expected credit loss provisions proposed by
the Investment Adviser. An independent credit rating services
company provides probability of default (“PD”) and loss given
default (“LGD”) ratios of individual counterparties to support the
calculation of ECL provisions.
Diversification of counterparties and service providers ensures any
impact is limited. In addition, a diversified portfolio provides
furthermitigation.
Concentration
risk
The risk that the concentration of investments in a limited
number of countries, counterparties, geographical markets,
tenure and currencies could expose the Company to
unnecessary fluctuations in a narrow range of markets.
This risk could negatively impact the Company’s performance
and ability to meet strategic targets.
The AIFM and the Investment Adviser continuously monitor the
existing portfolio against the Company’s portfolio concentration
limits and investment policy. This mitigates the risk by ensuring
that concentration limits and asset diversification limits are observed.
As at 31 December 2024, the Company had no substantial geographic
exposure to any one country (with assets principally in Italy, Spain,
Germany and the UK).
Environmental/
Social/
Governance
(“ESG”)
Failure to adequately consider ESG implications when
making and monitoring investments could lead to
reputational risk: exposure to greenwashing claims and
potentially have an adverse impact on the portfolio’s
ability to achieve its targeted returns.
The Investment Adviser performs detailed due diligence on ESG
for each asset prior to recommendation.
General standards including IFS Performance Standards, IFC
Environmental Health and Safety Guidelines (‘‘EHS’’) and Equator
Principles as well as local health and safety and social laws are
reviewed on a regular basis for all assets depending on the location
and development status of each asset.
20 | © 2024 AEET
Economic and Markets
Principal Risks Potential Impact/Description Mitigation
Discount
management
Market sentiment has moved the share price to a persistent
discount to NAV.
There is a risk that the Company will not be able to find
ways to bring the share price back to NAV, leading to
Shareholders being unable to realise their investments
through the secondary market at Net Asset Value or at
market price.
Loss of market confidence in the Board/Investment
Adviser.
The Company’s Broker monitors the market for the Company’s
shares and reports at quarterly Board meetings. The Company has
the authority, if appropriate, to purchase Ordinary Shares in the
market with the result of, amongst other things, enhancing the Net
Asset Value per Ordinary Share.
The Board and Broker maintains engagement with Shareholders
and ensures good market information is available to investors.
Following the successful continuation and managed run-off vote in
June 2023, the Board, with its advisers, continues to consider strategic
options, including asset realisations, to maximise value for Shareholders.
Interest rates/
inflation
Changes to interest rates may impact the valuation of
the investment portfolio by impacting the valuation
discount rate. This in turn may have an adverse impact
on the attractiveness of returns.
Although energy prices have fallen from the heights,
they reached in mid-2022, current global geopolitics
could drive a return to increased energy prices and
volatility, as well as prolonged higher inflation and interest
rate levels.
The Company’s investments, which provide in many cases for fixed
returns, are not significantly exposed to inflation and interest rate
movements because the income streams from investments are not
subject to significant deductions for operating costs associated
with the investments. While there may be O&M costs these are
not a high percentage of revenues and so any inflationary pressures
on such costs are not expected to have a significant impact.
Furthermore, the Company has not taken on indebtedness to
finance its investments and so there is no risk of the costs of
indebtedness negatively impacting the revenues from investments.
Were the Company to take on indebtedness it may use derivative
instruments such as futures, options and swaps to protect the
Company from fluctuations in interest rates.
The Investment Adviser manages the correlation of cash flows to
inflation and resilience to the economic environment.
The Investment Adviser has sought to incorporate RPI adjustments
in investment documentation where possible.
In addition, investing in energy efficiency assets can in some cases
provide an effective protection against inflation, as many such
assets benefit from rising electricity prices with no burden on the
cost side in relation to the use of resources.
Relations with
ESCOs during
managed run-off
Entering a managed run-off has strained relations with
some ESCOs who may have expected further volume
from AEET over time, giving rise to further counterparty/
credit risk for the Company.
In certain investments there is risk on the ESCO to provide a
continuing service to enable the underlying investment, for example,
to deliver energy savings or produce renewable energy. Where
relationships may be strained the ESCO may not deliver such service
and/or there may be a requirement to secure an alternative service
provider, in which circumstances receivables may be at risk and/
or the cost of delivering the necessary services may increase.
Appropriate provisions have been made within the financial
statements where necessary. Communications with the ESCOs
from the Investment Adviser (“IA”) take into account these
considerations and professional advice has been sought by the
Company where needed.
The Board and IA will continue to monitor relations with ESCOs
as the run-off progresses.
© 2024 AEET | 21
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
RISK MANAGEMENT
CONTINUED
Economic and Markets continued
Principal Risks Potential Impact/Description Mitigation
Service provider
risk
Risks that the Company’s third-party service providers
do not perform to the appropriate standards.
Potential lack of resource, experience or depth in the
Investment Adviser’s team to manage the Company’s
investments. This may be exacerbated by the Managed
Run-off status of the Company which has led, over time,
to reduced fees for the Investment Adviser.
Possible conflicts with other private Aquila clients and
private investing vehicles which Aquila cannot disclose
to the Board or the AIFM.
The Investment Adviser is dependent on key people to
identify, acquire and manage the Company’s investments.
The Board continues to monitor the quality of services provided by
all of its service providers, and in particular, the Investment Adviser.
Where it is deemed that work carried out by any service provider is
of insufficient quality, the Board will procure additional services from
other service providers with a view to ensuring the required standard
of portfolio management and reporting is maintained. The Board
will reserve its right to recover the cost of such additional services
from the current service providers.
Additionally through the Management Engagement Committee,
the Board conducts a formal assessment of each key service provider’s
performance once a year. To assist its ability to properly oversee the
Company’s service providers, the Board requires each service provider
to notify it as soon as reasonably practicable following any material
breach of its contract with the Company.
The Company and AIFM are made aware of and review potential
conflicts of interest at the time of each investment being made.
Conflicts of interest and investment allocation policies are in place
and agreed with the Board.
The strength and depth of the Investment Adviser’s resources mitigate
the risk of a key person departure and provides the ability to draw
skills from other areas if needed.
Operational
Principal Risks Potential Impact/Description Mitigation
IT security
A hacker or third party could obtain access to the Investment
Adviser or any other service provider and destroy data
or use it for malicious purposes resulting in reputational
damage and possible GDPR concern.
Data records could be destroyed resulting in an inability
to make investment decisions and/or monitor investments.
Service providers have been carefully selected for their expertise
and reputation in the sector. Each service provider has provided
assurances to both the AIFM and the Company on their cyber
policies and business continuity plans along with external reviews
of their procedures where applicable.
The AIFM, Administrator and Board include Cyber Risk in their
reviews of counterparties.
Principal Risks continued
22 | © 2024 AEET
Emerging Risks
Principal Risks Potential Impact/Description Mitigation
Shrinking
Company size
relative to cost
base.
As the run-off progresses there will be a significantly
reduced size to the portfolio, which will in turn reduce
the IA fee and potentially place a strain on available IA
resourcing. As several costs are fixed, this will potentially
lead to a growing cost base relative to the size of
theCompany.
The Board will continue to monitor the services of IA and other
providers during run-off. Should it be considered that there is either
a lack of sufficient service, this can be addressed prior to it having
a detrimental effect on the Company.
Conversely, should the Board feel that costs are becoming
disproportionately high relative to the requirements of the Company,
steps can be taken to scale back providers and their associated
costs where possible.
Financial
Principal Risks Potential Impact/Description Mitigation
Portfolio
Carrying Value
The principal component of the Company’s balance sheet
is its portfolio of energy efficiency assets. The Investment
Adviser is responsible for preparing a fair market value
of the investments where such investments have variable
returns. Fair value calculations rely on projections, which
involve estimates of the future, which are inherently
judgmental.
There is a risk that these valuations and underlying
assumptions such as discount rates being applied are not
a fair reflection of an open market valuation, therefore
the investment portfolio could be over or under valued.
Investments with fixed returns are measured at amortised
cost and subject to expected credit loss provisions, which
are based on numerous assumptions and judgments.
The Investment Adviser has experience in undertaking valuations
of renewable sustainability/energy transition assets. In addition,
independent advice from a professional accounting services firm
has been received to ensure that the Portfolio valuation adheres to
the relevant accounting standards.
The AIFM and the Board review and interrogate the valuations and
underlying assumptions provided by the Investment Adviser.
It should be noted that valuations are held at fair value and at
amortised cost and not at net realisable value.
Act of War/
Sanctions
As evidenced with conflict in the Ukraine and the Middle
East, various sanctions and restrictions imposed. There
is a possibility that there could be supply delays for
Operations and Maintenance (“O&M”), sanction
considerations, volatile markets and general uncertainty.
More difficult energy markets are expected along with
inflationary pressures on inputs.
It has also led to short term price increases and more
focus on renewable energy infrastructure.
Possible change to the world order and globalisation.
Conflict brings uncertainty to the commodities market
and how price levels of modules and other hardware will
be impacted directly or indirectly.
The Company does not have any direct exposure in Ukraine, Russia
or the Middle East, there are also no direct business relationships
with counterparties from these countries; therefore assessments
have led the Company to the conclusion that its investments in
Europe are not impacted directly at this time.
Capital
Preservation
During the run-off, there is a risk that overdistribution
of cash will leave the Company short of sufficient liquidity
to meet ongoing expenditure.
The Board, Investment Adviser and AIFM will review the ongoing
liquidity requirements and cashflow forecasts of the Company prior
to making distributions to ensure that sufficient funds are maintained
throughout the run-off process.
© 2024 AEET | 23
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
SECTION 172 REPORT
In accordance with section 172 of the Companies Act 2006
(the “Act”), the Board has a duty to promote the long-term
success of the Company for the benefit of its Shareholders
as a whole and, in doing so, the Board is required to consider
the likely consequences of its actions over the long-term
and on other stakeholders and the environment.
The Directors are required to describe how they have had
regard to matters set out in section 172 of the Act.
Employees and stakeholders
As an externally managed investment company, the Company
does not have any employees. Its main stakeholders are as
set out in the diagram below which explains the relationship
between the Company and each of its stakeholders. The
Company’s stakeholders are the Board, Shareholders,
Investment Adviser, Investments, ESCOs, AIFM, Administrator,
Company Secretary, Broker, Legal Adviser and its Registrar.
The Board believes the best interests of the Company are
aligned with its stakeholders as all parties aim to ultimately
benefit from achieving the Company’s investment objectives
in compliance with regulatory, legal, ethical and commercial
standards.
Investment
Adviser
Board
Shareholders
Company
Secretary
Administrator
Registrar
Broker
AIFM
Investments
ESCOs
Legal
Advisers
Company
Companys Operating Model
The Company was listed on the main market of the London
Stock Exchange on 2 June 2021. The Company can hold
investments directly or through subsidiaries.
Engagement with Key Service Providers
The Board has identified that its key service providers are
the Company’s AIFM, Administrator, Company Secretary,
Brokers, Legal Adviser, Registrars, PR Consultants and
Investment Adviser.
In order to ensure strong working relationships, the
Company’s key service providers are invited to attend the
regular Board meetings to present their respective reports.
The Board seeks to maintain constructive relationships
with the Company’s key service providers on behalf of
the Company through regular communications, meetings
and the provision of relevant information and update
meetings. This enables the Board to exercise effective
oversight of the Company’s activities.
On at least an annual basis, the Board has committed to
undertake a thorough evaluation of each of its service
providers during which it considers their performance
against the terms of their engagement, including each
service providers fees to ensure that each remain competitive
within the market. Additionally, on an annual basis the
Board reviews the internal reports produced on behalf of
those service providers that are key to the Company’s
day-to-day administration (the AIFM, Administrator and
Registrar) to ensure that there have been no failings in
their systems or procedures considered relevant to the
Company’s operations.
The Investment Adviser is the most significant service
provider to the Company and a description of its role can
be found on page 29. The Board receives regular reports
from the Investment Adviser, discusses the portfolio at
each Board meeting and maintains a constructive dialogue
between meetings. The Investment Advisers remuneration
is charged only on committed capital (being the sum of
funds actually invested and funds committed for investment
in Energy Efficiency Investments).
24 | © 2024 AEET
Engagement with Shareholders
Shareholders’ views are considered by the Board at their
quarterly meetings and assist in the Board’s decision-
making process.
The Board and the Company’s Broker engage constructively
with major Shareholders and the Board has meetings with
them as and when requested.
In addition, and in order to help the Board in its aim to
act fairly between the Company’s members, the Board
seeks to ensure effective communication is provided to
all Shareholders. The Board encourages Shareholders to
attend the Annual General Meeting on 28 May 2025 at
which the Board and representatives of the Investment
Adviser will be available to meet Shareholders in person
and to answer questions. The Annual Report has been
issued to Shareholders and will be available to view on
the Company’s website (www.aquila-energy-efficiency-
trust.com) as are the Company’s press releases.
Board Decisions
Investments
When the Company was set up and looking to invest the
proceeds raised in the IPO in June 2021, the Board was
presented with each investment opportunity identified by
the Investment Adviser, unless these fell under the authority
delegated to the AIFM to approve investments within certain
agreed criteria (“Delegated Authority”). These had undergone
a process of analysis and challenge by the AIFM, including
considerations relating to environmental, social and governance
issues. The Board considered each approved proposal
against the Company’s investment objectives, investment
policy and strategy. Following the failure of the continuation
vote on 28 February 2023, no new commitments were
made from that date, but contractually committed sums
were invested to honour existing contractual obligations.
During 2024, £4.2 million was deployed into investments,
which had been committed to on or before the date of the
Continuation Vote. As at 31 December 2024, the total value
of investments was £56.3 million. Further details for these
investments can be found at the Investment Adviser’s report
on pages 6 to 12.
Since the approval by Shareholders of the Managed Run-Off
in 2023 and following the unsuccessful attempt, run on
behalf of the Company by its financial advisers, to seek
offers from market participants for the portfolio of assets
(which ended in February 2024), the Board has continued
to seek opportunities to realise capital through the sale of
assets. Where the Board has been presented an opportunity
to realise an investment prior to its designated term it has
considered each opportunity against various criteria but
particularly whether the disposal represented fair value and
was in Shareholders’ interests, taking into account the New
Investment Policy.
Return of Capital
On 6 March 2024, the Company announced that it intended
to return capital to Shareholders by way of a Tender Offer
to ordinary Shareholders of up to 18,561,732 ordinary
shares for a maximum aggregate cash consideration of
£17.5 million. This entitlement to tender was undertaken
at a price of 94.28p, the Company’s NAV per share at
31December 2023. The Tender Offer was launched on
19 April 2024 and the result of the Tender Offer was
announced on 13 May 2024; 90,231,121 shares were
validly tendered, and the requisite Special Resolution was
passed, resulting in the purchase by the Company of
18,561,732 shares, which was the maximum amount
possible under the terms of the Tender Offer.
Decisions Following Year-End
Investments
As announced on 28 February 2025, the Company has
entered into agreements to realise its Bio-LNG investment
in Germany and the majority of its Italian Superbonus
investments for a combined gross consideration of
£26.8million.
As a result of these realisations, the Company has announced
on 28 April 2025 the payment of a special interim dividend
of 36.837 pence per Ordinary Share.
© 2024 AEET | 25
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
26 | © 2024 AEET
Task Force for Climate-Related Financial
Disclosures (“TCFD”)
The Company notes the TCFD recommendations on climate
related financial disclosures. As stated above, the Company
is an investment trust with no employees, internal operations
or property and, as such, is exempt from TCFD disclosure
requirements.
Anti-bribery, corruption and tax evasion
It is the Company’s policy to conduct all of its business in
an honest and ethical manner. The Company takes a
zero-tolerance approach to bribery and corruption and is
committed to acting professionally, fairly and with integrity
in all its business dealings and relationships wherever it
operates. The Company does not tolerate the criminal
facilitation of tax evasion. The Company’s AIFM, Investment
Adviser, Company Secretary and Administrator have
confirmed that anti-bribery policies and procedures are
in place and that they do not tolerate bribery. The Company’s
policy and the procedures that implement it are designed
to support that commitment.
Conflicts of Interest
As required by law, a Director must avoid a situation where
he or she has an interest that conflicts with the Company’s
interests. The Companys Articles of Association provide
the Directors with the authority to authorise potential
conflicts of interest. The Directors are able to impose limits
or conditions when giving authorisation if they think this
is appropriate. The procedure observed by the Board in
considering dealing with conflicted matters is as follows:
n
any Board member so conflicted must recuse themself
from the discussion involving the relevant conflict;
n
only Directors who have no interest in the matter being
considered are able to debate the matter and take the
relevant decision; and
n in taking the decision, the Directors must act in a way
they consider, in good faith, will be most likely to
promote the Company’s success.
The Directors have declared any potential conflicts of
interest to the Company. These are entered into the
Company’s register of potential conflicts, which is reviewed
regularly by the Board. The Directors are obliged to advise
the Company Secretary as soon as they become aware
of any potential conflicts of interest.
The Company has established procedures to deal with
any potential conflicts of interest in circumstances where
Aquila Capital is advising both the AIFM (for the Company)
and other Aquila Capital managed funds that are
counterparties to the Company. These procedures may,
on a case-by-case basis, include:
n
identifying whether potential conflicts of interest exist
on individual transactions and the nature of the potential
conflicts of interest;
n
establishing that an individual transaction has been
negotiated on arm’s length commercial terms;
n
separate teams at the Investment Adviser being established
in relation to any proposed transaction to represent
the Company and the relevant counterparty;
n
a fairness opinion on the value of the Energy Efficiency
Investments to be obtained from an independent expert;
n
a due diligence and reporting package from relevant
professional advisers on which the Company (or other
applicable vehicles) can place reliance;
n
the AIFM operating its own risk management system
and internal control system as well as monitoring approved
systems operated by the Investment Adviser; and
n
any conflict of interest arising in the course of the
transaction being resolved in accordance with procedures
agreed between the Investment Adviser and the AIFM,
subject to Board agreement.
OTHER INFORMATION
© 2024 AEET | 27
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
Employees
The Company has no employees. As at 31 December
2024, the Company had four Directors, of whom two
were female and two were male. The Board’s policy on
diversity is contained in the Corporate Governance Statement
(see page 40).
Viability Statement
In accordance with the UK Corporate Governance Code
(“UK Code”) and the Listing Rules, the Directors have assessed
the prospects of the Company over a longer period than the
12 months required by the ‘Going Concern’ provision.
In reviewing the Company’s viability, the Directors have
assessed the viability of the Company for the period to
31 December 2027 (the “Look-forward Period”).
Following the change in investment policy approved by
Shareholders at the 2023 AGM, the Company entered a
managed run-off, meaning that it is not making any new
investments (save for in limited circumstances as set out
in the New Investment Policy) and its investing activity is
solely in respect of funding legal commitments to existing
investments (the “Managed Run-Off”). The Board will
continue to review strategic options in respect of the
Company’s assets to realise the maximum value for
Shareholders in the shortest possible time, recognising
the inherent difficulties in the construction of the portfolio,
including the number of investments, multiple geographies
and long tenors. While the Company is continuing to
explore strategic options there remains no certainty that
any of these options will materialise and be put to
Shareholders for consideration. Accordingly, the Directors
recognise that these conditions indicate the existence of
material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt
about the Group and the Company’s viability over the
Look-forward Period.
Although the Company is in a Managed Run-Off, the
Board believes that the Look-forward Period, being
approximately three years, is an appropriate time horizon
over which to assess the viability of the Company, particularly
when taking into account the long-term nature of the
maturity of the Company’s assets, which is modelled over
three years and the principal risks outlined above. In
considering the prospects of the Company, the Directors
looked at the key risks facing the Company, focusing on
the likelihood and impact of each risk as well as any key
contracts, future events or timescales that may be assigned
to each key risk.
The Directors have a reasonable expectation that the
Company has adequate resources to: continue in operation;
realise the Company’s assets in an orderly manner; and
meet its liabilities as they fall due, over the Look-forward
Period.
Outlook
The outlook for the Company, including the future
development and performance of the Company, is discussed
in the Chair’s Statement on page 4 and the Investment
Adviser’s Report on page 6.
Strategic Report
The Strategic Report set out on pages 4 to 27 of this
Annual Report was approved by the Board of Directors
on 28 April 2025.
For and on behalf of the Board
Miriam Greenwood OBE DL
Chair of the Board
28 April 2025
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
The Directors present their report and financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2024.
Corporate Governance
The Corporate Governance Statement on pages 34 to 42
forms part of this report.
Introduction and Status
The Company is incorporated in England and Wales as a
public limited company and is domiciled in the United
Kingdom. It is an investment company as defined in section
833 of the Act and has a premium listing on the London
Stock Exchange.
The Company received approval as an investment trust
from HMRC. The Company must meet eligibility conditions
and ongoing requirements in order for investment trust
status to be maintained. In the opinion of the Directors,
the Company has met the conditions and requirements for
approval as an investment trust for the year ended
31December 2024, and the Directors, under advice, expect
the affairs of the Company to continue to satisfy the
conditions of an investment trust. The Company seeks to
continue to operate as an investment trust in accordance
with section 1158 and 1159 of the Corporation Tax Act
2010 (as amended by section 42(2) of the Finance Act 2011).
Greenhouse Gas Emissions (“GHG”) and Streamlined
Energy and Carbon Reporting (“SECR”)
As the Company has outsourced operations to third parties,
there are no significant GHG emissions to report in relation
to the operation of the Company. The Company qualifies
as a low energy user and is therefore not required to
produce an energy and carbon report under the SECR
framework. In relation to the Company’s investments, the
level of GHG emissions arising from a low volume of
electricity imports and from operation and maintenance
activity is not considered material for disclosure purposes.
Retail distribution of Investment Company shares via
financial advisers and other third-party promoters
As a result of the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA)
rules determining which investment products can be
promoted to retail investors, certain investment products
are classified as ‘non-mainstream pooled investment
products’ and face restrictions on their promotion to retail
investors.
The Company has concluded that the distribution of its
shares, being shares in an investment trust, is not restricted
as a result of the FCA rules described above.
The Company currently conducts its affairs and intends
to do so for the foreseeable future so that the exclusion
continues to apply. The Company’s ordinary shares are
eligible for inclusion in a stocks and shares ISA.
Alternative Investment Fund Manager (“AIFM”)
The Company is classified as an Alternative Investment
Fund under The Alternative Investment Fund Managers’
Directive (AIFMD”) and is therefore required to have an
AIFM. FundRock Management Company (Guernsey) Limited
is the AIFM of the Company.
The AIFM is responsible for the portfolio management of
the Company’s assets, including the following services:
monitoring the Energy Efficiency Investments in
accordance with the Investment Policy;
evaluating investment opportunities identified by the
Investment Adviser and making relevant recommendations
to the Board; and
acting upon instructions from the Board with regard
to the execution of transactions on behalf of the
Company.
28 | © 2024 AEET
Under the terms of the AIFM Agreement, the AIFM is
required to provide risk management services to the
Company, including:
assisting the Board with the establishment of a risk
reporting framework; monitoring the Company’s
compliance with its Investment Policy and the Investment
Restrictions in accordance with the AIFM risk management
policies and procedures and providing regular updates
to the Board; and
carrying out a risk analysis of the Company’s exposures,
leverage, counterparty and concentration risk; and
analysing market risk and liquidity risk. The AIFM will
be required to record details of executed transactions,
carry out reporting obligations to the FCA and prepare
investor reports. In addition, the AIFM is required to
assist the Board in establishing, maintaining and
reviewing valuation policies for the purpose of calculating
the NAV.
Under an agreement dated 10 May 2021, the AIFM is
entitled to:
a management fee of £87,500 per annum (subject to
annual RPI) plus an additional amount which is equal
to 0.015% per annum of the Net Asset Value of the
Company that exceeds £250 million;
an additional fee of £3,000 per annum (subject to
annual RPI) in respect of each jurisdiction in which a
marketing notification has been made in accordance
with the UK AIFMD and the EU AIFM Directive; and
the reimbursement of the investment advisory fee
payable by the AIFM to the Investment Adviser.
The AIFM Agreement is terminable by either party on not
less than six months’ notice in writing. The AIFM Agreement
may be terminated earlier by the AIFM with immediate
effect in certain circumstances.
The AIFM has the benefit of an indemnity from the
Company in relation to liabilities incurred by the AIFM in
the discharge of its duties other than those arising by
reason of gross negligence, wilful misconduct or fraud of
or by the AIFM.
Investment Adviser
The AIFM has appointed Aquila Capital Investmentgesellschaft
mbH as the Investment Adviser to provide investment
advisory services to the AIFM in respect of the Company
pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement.
The Investment Adviser is responsible for certain investment
advisory services to the Company, including sourcing
potential opportunities in which the Company may invest,
as well as on-going monitoring of the Energy Efficiency
Investments.
The Company will benefit from the advisory services
provided to the AIFM by the Investment Adviser in respect
of the Company and its Energy Efficiency Investments.
The Investment Advisory Agreement will continue in force
for an initial period of four years from the date of Admission.
The Investment Advisory Agreement will continue thereafter
on a rolling basis and may be terminated following the
initial period on 12 months’ notice in writing.
The AIFM has also agreed to indemnify the Investment
Adviser for losses that the Investment Adviser may incur
in the performance of its duties pursuant to the Investment
Advisory Agreement that are not attributable to the fraud,
gross negligence or wilful default of, the Investment Adviser
determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.
Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, entered into
at the time of IPO, the following fee is payable to the
Investment Adviser:
(i) 0.95% per annum of NAV (plus VAT) of the Company
up to and including £500 million; and
(ii) 0.75% per annum NAV (plus VAT) of the Company
above £500 million.
Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Investment
Adviser is entitled to an advisory fee based on the Company’s
NAV. As announced on 21 April 2022, the Investment
Adviser agreed to amend the Investment Advisory Agreement
such that any advisory fees payable are charged only on
committed capital (being the sum of funds actually invested
and funds committed for investment in Energy Efficiency
Investments), with this amendment to be applied
retrospectively from the time of the Company’s IPO.
© 2024 AEET | 29
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
Company Secretary and Administrator
Apex Listed Companies Services (UK) Limited has been
appointed to provide company secretarial and administration
services to the Group. The AIFM, Company Secretary and
Administrator are part of the Apex group of companies.
Alternative Investment Fund Portfolio Managers’
Directive
In accordance with the AIFMD, the AIFM must ensure that
an annual report containing certain information on the
Company is made available to investors for each financial
year. The investment funds sourcebook of the FCA (the
“Sourcebook”) details the requirements of the annual
report. All the information required by those rules are
included in this Annual Report or will be made available
on the Company’s website.
Continuing Appointment of the Investment Adviser
The performance of the Investment Adviser is subject to
rigorous review by the Board. During 2024, the continuing
appointment of the Investment Adviser was recommended
by the Board.
Share Capital
As at 31 December 2024, the Company’s issued share
capital comprised 81,438,268 Ordinary Shares (31 December
2023: 100,000,000).
Voting rights
Each Ordinary Share entitles the holder to one vote. All
Ordinary Shares carry equal voting rights and there are
no restrictions on those voting rights. Voting deadlines
are stated in the Notice of Meeting and Form of Proxy
and are in accordance with the Act.
Restrictions
There are no restrictions on the transfer of Shares, nor
are there any limitations or special rights associated with
regard to control attached to the Ordinary Shares. There
are no agreements between holders regarding their transfer
known to the Company, no restrictions on the distribution
of dividends and the repayment of capital, and no agreements
to which the Company is a party that might affect its
control following a successful takeover bid.
Results and Dividend
The Group’s revenue loss after tax for the year amounted
£0.2 million (2023: £0.9 million). An interim dividend of
6.139p per Ordinary Share was paid in respect of the period
ended 30 June 2024 and the Board has declared a special
interim dividend of 36.837 pence per ordinary share in
respect of the first six months of the financial year ending
30 June 2025, payable on 30 May 2025, to Shareholders
on the register on 9 May 2025. The ex-dividend date is
8May 2025.
Notifiable Shareholders
As at 31 December 2024, the Directors have been formally
notified of the following interests in the Company’s
Ordinary Shares, comprising 3% or more of the issued
share capital of the Company:
Shareholder Holding
Percentage
held*
Date
notified
Rathbones Investment Management Ltd 14,653,937 17.99 24/12/2024
Schroders Plc 12,087,401 14.84 16/05/2024
Lion Umbrella Fund I S. A. SICAV-RAIF 12,978,637 12.98 23/02/2022
Stichting Juridisch Eigendom Privium Sustainable Impact Fund 4,795,151 5.89 16/05/2024
Marmarkon 4 S.à r.l. 5,847,819 5.85 28/06/2021
City of Bradford - West Yorkshire Pension Fund 5,000,000 5.00 03/06/2021
Premier Miton Group plc 3,308,654 4.06 20/05/2024
* Percentage held as at the date notified.
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
CONTINUED
30 | © 2024 AEET
Since year end, the Company has been notified of the
following change to the above shareholdings:
Rathbones Investment Management Ltd notified the
Company on 10 March 2025 that it had sold 1,295,225
Ordinary Shares, resulting in a holding of 16.40% of
the issued share capital of the Company; and
Morgan Stanley notified the Company on 11 March
2025 of a holding of 5.04% of the issued share capital
of the Company.
Shareholder Engagement
The Board is mindful of the importance of engaging with
the Company’s Shareholders to gauge their views on
topics affecting the Company. The Chair engaged closely
with its major Shareholders during the year to discuss
their expectations and requirements.
The Company’s Annual General Meeting will be held on
28 May 2025 at 2:00pm at the offices of CMS Cameron
McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP located at Cannon Place,
78 Cannon Street, London EC4N 6AF. Shareholders are
encouraged to attend the Annual General Meeting of the
Company. Proxy voting figures will be made available
shortly after the AGM on the Company’s website.
Appointment of Auditor
The Company’s auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
(“PwC”), having expressed their willingness to continue
in office as auditors, will be put forward for appointment
at the Company’s Annual General Meeting and the Board
will seek authority to determine their remuneration for
the forthcoming year.
Going Concern
The Directors have adopted the going concern basis in
preparing the financial statements. The following is a summary
of the Directors’ assessment of the going concern status of
the Group and Company.
The Group and Company continue to meet day-to-day
liquidity needs through their cash resources. The Directors
have a reasonable expectation that the Group and Company
have adequate resources to continue in operational existence
for at least twelve months from the date of thisdocument.
In reaching this conclusion, the Directors have taken into
account the following considerations:
The Group’s investment commitments, amounting to
£0.04million, and its income and expense flows;
No new commitments have been entered into since
28February 2023;
The £36.4 million cash balance at 31 March 2025
(excluding £2.5 million held as collateral for FX hedging)
following the receipt of repayments up to that date;
and
The potential income from the remaining investments.
The Board has announced that a special interim dividend
of 36.837 pence per Ordinary Share will be paid on 30 May
2025. Total expenses for the year were £3.0 million (excluding
impairment losses) (2023:£3.3million), which represented
3.8% of average net assets during the year (2023: 3.5%).
The Board, Investment Adviser and AIFM will review the
ongoing liquidity requirements and cashflow forecasts of
the Company prior to making further distributions to ensure
that sufficient funds are maintained throughout the run-off
process. At the date of approval of this document, based
on the aggregate of investments and cash held, the Group
and Company have substantial operating expenses cover.
The Directors are also satisfied that the Group and Company
would continue to remain viable under downside scenarios.
As set out in the 2023 Annual Report, at the 2023 AGM,
Shareholders voted in favour of the Company’s change
of investment policy (the “New Investment Policy”).
Following the 2023 AGM, and in accordance with the
New Investment Policy, the Company entered a continuation
and managed run-off of its portfolio (“Managed Run-Off”),
meaning that it is not making any new investments (save
for the limited circumstances as set out in the New
Investment Policy) and its investing activity is solely in
respect of funding legal commitments to existing investments.
The Continuation and Managed Run-Off Resolution was
put forward as a resolution to Shareholders in response
to the outcome of the Company’s continuation vote held
in February 2023, which did not pass.
As referred to above, the Company is operating currently
under a Managed Run-Off with the term of some of the
Company’s assets being several years. While the Company
is continuing to explore other strategic options, there
© 2024 AEET | 31
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
remains no certainty that any of these options will materialise
and be put to Shareholders for consideration.
Accordingly, while the Directors recognise that these
conditions indicate the existence of material uncertainty
which may cast significant doubt about the Group and
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, based
on the assessment and considerations above, the Directors
have concluded that the financial statements of the Group
and the Company should be prepared on a going concern
basis. Neither the Group nor the Company financial
statements include any potential costs of liquidation and
the financial statements do not include the other adjustments
that would result if the Group and the Company were
unable to continue as a going concern.
Auditor information
Each of the Directors at the date of the approval of this
report confirms that:
I. so far as the Director is aware, there is no relevant
audit information of which the Company’s auditors
are unaware; and
II. the Director has taken all steps that he/she ought to
have taken as director to make himself/herself aware
of any relevant information and to establish that the
Company’s auditors are aware of that information.
This confirmation is given and should be interpreted in
accordance with the provisions of Section 418 of the
Companies Act 2006.
Annual General Meeting (“AGM”)
The Company’s AGM will be held on 28 May 2025 at the
offices of CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
located at Cannon Place, 78 Cannon Street, London EC4N
6AF. Full details of the AGM, the resolutions proposed and
how to vote by proxy are described in the Notice of AGM,
which can be found on the Company’s website. Shareholders
are welcome at any time to submit questions they may
have to aeetcosecmbx@apexgroup.com.
Resolutions relating to the following items of special business
will be proposed at the forthcoming AGM to be held on
28 May 2025.
Special Resolution 10.
Authority for the Company to purchase its own
shares
This resolution replaces the authority given at last year’s
annual general meeting for the Company to make market
purchases of its own Ordinary Shares as permitted by the
Companies Act 2006. The Directors recommend that an
authority to purchase up to a maximum of 12,207,596
Ordinary Shares, representing 14.99% of Ordinary Shares
in issue as at 28 April 2025, being the latest practicable
date prior to the publication of the Notice of AGM, (subject
to the condition that not more than 14.99%. of the
Ordinary Shares in issue, excluding Treasury Shares, at the
date of the AGM are purchased) be granted. Any Ordinary
Shares purchased will either be cancelled or, if the Directors
so determine, held in treasury. At the date of this document,
the Company did not hold any shares in treasury.
The price per Ordinary Share that the Company may pay
is set at a minimum amount of the nominal value of each
Ordinary Share and a maximum amount of the higher of:
(i) 105%. of the average of the previous five business days’
middle market prices as derived from the Daily Official
List of the London Stock Exchange; and (ii) the higher of
the price of the last independent trade of an Ordinary
Share and the highest current independent bid for an
Ordinary Share on the trading venue where the purchase
is carried out. Unless otherwise authorised by Shareholders,
Ordinary Shares will not be issued at less than NAV and
Ordinary Shares held in treasury will not be sold at less
than NAV.
This authority would continue to provide flexibility in the
management of the Company’s capital resources. The
Directors will only exercise this authority if the Directors
believe that such exercise would be likely to achieve the
best balance for Shareholders for making timely returns
of capital to Shareholders.
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
CONTINUED
32 | © 2024 AEET
Special Resolution 11.
Authority to call general meetings (other than annual
general meetings) on 14 clear days’ notice
The minimum notice period for general meetings of the
Company is 21 days unless Shareholders approve a shorter
period for general meetings (other than an annual general
meeting), which cannot be less than 14 clear days. The
Board believes that it is in the best interests of Shareholders
to have the ability to call meetings on 14 clear days’ notice
on matters requiring urgent approval and resolution 11
seeks such approval.
In accordance with the Companies (Shareholders’ Rights)
Regulation 2009, the Company will offer Shareholders
the ability to vote by electronic means. This facility will be
accessible to all Shareholders, should the Board call a
general meeting at 14 clear days’ notice. Short notice will
only be used by the Board under appropriate circumstances.
If given, the approval would be effective until the Company’s
next annual general meeting.
Outlook
The outlook for the Company, including the future
development and performance of the Company, is discussed
in the Chair’s Statement on page 4 and the Investment
Advisers Report on page 6.
By order of the Board
Sinead van Duuren
For and on behalf of
Apex Listed Companies Services (UK) Limited
Company Secretary
28 April 2025
© 2024 AEET | 33
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
Corporate Governance Framework
Responsibility for good governance lies with the Board.
The governance framework of the Company reflects the
fact that it is an investment company with no employees
and outsources investment management and other key
functions to external service providers.
Statement of Compliance and Application of the AIC
Code’s Principles
The Board has considered the principles and provisions of
the Association of Investment Companies (AIC”) Code
of Corporate Governance issued in February 2019 (the
AIC Code”). The AIC Code addresses the principles and
provisions set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code
(“UK Code”), as well as setting out additional provisions
on issues that are of specific relevance to the Company.
The Board considers that reporting against the AIC Code,
which has been endorsed by the Financial Reporting
Council, provides more relevant information to Shareholders.
The AIC Code is available on the AIC website (www.theaic.co.uk)
and the UK Code can be found on the Financial Reporting
Council’s website (www.frc.org.uk). The AIC Code includes
an explanation of how it adapts the principles and provisions
set out in the UK Code to make them relevant for investment
companies.
Compliance
Throughout the year ended 31 December 2024 the
Company complied with the recommendations of the AIC
Code except, as explained below, where the Company
does not believe it appropriate to comply.
The UK Code includes provisions relating to the role of
the chief executive, executive Directors’ remuneration and
the need for an internal audit function. For reasons set
out in the AIC Code, the Board considers these provisions
are not relevant to the Company as it is an externally
managed investment company. In particular, all of the
Company’s day-to-day management and administrative
functions are outsourced to third parties. As a result, the
Company has no executive Directors, employees or internal
operations. The Company has therefore not reported
further in respect of these provisions.
BOARD LEADERSHIP AND PURPOSE
The Company is an investment company and its investment
objective and policy are set out on page 16. Any material
change to the investment policy requires Shareholder
approval.
The Company is governed by a Board of Directors, all of
whom are non-executive, and it has no employees. The
business model adopted by the Board to achieve the
Company’s objective has been to contract the services of
the Investment Adviser and AIFM to manage the portfolio
and the risks associated in accordance with the Board’s
strategy and under its oversight. The Board monitors
adherence to the Company’s investment policy and regularly
reviews the Company’s performance in meeting its
investment objective.
All other functions are provided by third parties under the
oversight of the Board.
The Board reviews the performance of the AIFM and
Investment Adviser and its other key service providers on
an ongoing basis.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
34 | © 2024 AEET
Experience and Contribution of Directors
As at the date of this report, the Board of Directors consists of four non-executive Directors, whose biographies are
included below.
Miriam Greenwood OBE DL
Non-Executive Chair*
Appointed on 19 April 2021
With qualifications as a barrister and in corporate finance,
Miriam spent more than 30 years working for a number
of leading investment banks and other financial institutions.
In previous roles, she served as a non- executive Director
of the UK energy regulator OFGEM and on the Board of
a number of publicly quoted companies and was also a
founding partner of SPARK Advisory Partners, an independent
corporate advisory business.
Miriam is currently chair of ESP Utilities Group Ltd, senior
independent director of Canopius Group Limited, a
non-executive director of Canopius Managing Agents,
Encyclis Holdco Limited and Liontrust Asset Management
plc, and an adviser to the Mayor of London’s Energy
Efficiency Fund.
A Deputy Lieutenant of the City of Edinburgh, Miriam
was awarded an OBE for services to corporate finance
in2000.
David Fletcher
Non-Executive Director, Senior
Independent Director*
Appointed on 29 April 2022
David was Group Finance Director of Stonehage Fleming
Family & Partners, a leading independently owned multi-
family office, having joined in 2002. Prior to that, he spent
20years in investment banking with JPMorgan Chase,
Robert Fleming & Co. and Baring Brothers & Co Limited,
latterly focused on financial services in the UK (asset
management and life insurance). He started his career
with Price Waterhouse and is a chartered accountant. He
is the Chair of JPMorgan Claverhouse Investment Trust
plc. He is also a director and Audit Committee Chairman
at Ecofin US Renewables Infrastructure Trust plc. David is
a graduate of Oxford University.
© 2024 AEET | 35
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
Nicholas Bliss
Non-Executive Director*
Appointed on 9 April 2021
Nicholas established and led the global infrastructure and
transport sector group at the international law firm
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP where he was a partner
for over 20 years and also served on the Partnership
Council, the supervisory board of the firm. During this
period he led on mandates involving some of the most
notable infrastructure projects across the UK, Europe,
Africa and the Gulf. In particular, he was heavily involved
in the development and application of PFI, PPP and other
project finance techniques to the delivery of major
infrastructure projects. Since leaving Freshfields, he has
developed an expertise in both advising and acting as an
independent director in “distressed situations” at SPV
corporates owned by infrastructure funds or industrials.
Among his other engagements, he is Of Counsel at
Chatham Partners LLP, a Hamburg based infrastructure/
energy/real estate “boutique” law firm.
Janine Freeman
Non-Executive Director*
Appointed on 2 November 2022
Janine Freeman is an experienced, senior energy industry
executive and Non-executive Director with over 20 years
in the energy industry. Driving investment in clean energy
infrastructure has been her primary focus for much of
that time. Janine is currently a Non-executive Director and
Audit and Risk Committee Chair at Harmony Energy Income
Trust plc, a non-executive director of Phoenix Technologies
Holdings Limited and Executive Chair at Intelligent Resource
Management Ltd. Previously, Janine was a Director at PwC
within the Deals team, where she led on Net Zero Investment
Strategy & Deals. At National Grid plc, where Janine spent
16 years, she was a member of the UK Executive Committee
and the GB Electricity System Operator Executive Committee.
Janine achieved her Chartered Accountancy qualification
(ACA) at Deloitte & Touche in London.
*All the Directors are members of each committee.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
CONTINUED
36 | © 2024 AEET
Board Committees
The Board decides upon the membership and chairmanship of its committees.
Audit and Risk Committee
The committee has formal terms of reference which clearly
define roles and responsibilities. It meets at least three
times a year or more often if required. A separate report
of the work of the Committee during the year under
review is set out on pages 48 to 50. The Committee
comprises all the independent non-executive Directors
and is chaired by David Fletcher. In accordance with the
AIC Code, the Chair of the Board is a member of the Audit
and Risk Committee as she was independent on appointment
and she remains so.
Remuneration Committee
The committee has formal terms of reference which clearly
define roles and responsibilities. It meets at least once a
year or more often if required. Its principal duties include
(i) agreeing the policy for the remuneration of the Directors
and reviewing any proposed changes to the policy; (ii)
reviewing and considering ad hoc payment to the Directors
in relation to duties undertaken over and above normal
business; and (iii) if required, appointing independent
professional remuneration advice. The Committee comprises
all the independent non-executive Directors and is chaired
by Janine Freeman.
© 2024 AEET | 37
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
Nomination Committee
The committee has formal terms of reference which
clearly define roles and responsibilities. It meets at least
once per annum. Its principal duties include:
i. identifying individuals qualified to become Board
members and selecting the director nominees for
election at general meetings of the Shareholders or
for appointment to fill vacancies;
ii. determining director nominees for each committee of
the Board;
iii. considering the appropriate composition of the Board
and its committees; and
iv. undertaking an annual performance evaluation of the
Board and its committees.
The Nomination Committee comprises all the independent
non-executive Directors and is chaired by Miriam Greenwood.
Management Engagement Committee
The committee has formal terms of reference which clearly
define roles and responsibilities. It meets at least once a
year or more often if required. Its principal duties include
regularly reviewing the contracts, the performance and
the remuneration of the Company’s key service providers.
The Management Engagement Committee comprises all
the independent non-executive Directors and is chaired
by Nicholas Bliss.
Decision Making
The Board is responsible for the overall stewardship of the
Company’s affairs and has adopted a schedule of matters
specifically reserved for decision by the Board. Strategic
issues and all operational matters of a material nature are
considered at its meetings, including reviewing the
Company’s performance by reference to the Company’s
key performance indicators.
The Board has access to independent advice at the
Company’s expense where it judges it necessary in order
to discharge its responsibilities properly.
Prior to being presented to the Board, each transaction
was considered by the AIFM who reviewed it against an
agreed set criteria of items to ensure it was suitable for
the Company’s long-term success and in Shareholders’
best interests.
Meeting Attendance during the year ended 31 December 2024
Board
Audit and Risk
Committee
Management
Engagement
Committee
Remuneration
Committee
Nomination
Committee
Miriam Greenwood 6/6 5/5 1/1 1/1 1/1
David Fletcher 6/6 5/5 1/1 1/1 1/1
Nicholas Bliss 6/6 5/5 1/1 1/1 1/1
Janine Freeman 6/6 5/5 1/1 1/1 1/1
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
CONTINUED
38 | © 2024 AEET
In addition, a number of ad hoc Board and Committee
meetings were held during the year under review to deal
with administrative matters and the formal approval of
documents, investment proposals and to consider the
valuation of the Company’s portfolio which were considered
time critical.
Directors’ share dealings
The Directors comply with the Share Dealing Code adopted
by the Company in accordance with UK Market Abuse
Regulations (the “Share Dealing Code”) in relation to their
dealings in Ordinary Shares. The Board is responsible for
taking all proper and reasonable steps to ensure compliance
with the Share Dealing Code by the Directors.
DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES
The independent Board is responsible to Shareholders for
the overall management of the Company. The following
sets out the division of responsibilities between the Chair,
the Board and its Committees.
Role of the Chair
The Chair leads the Board and is responsible for its overall
effectiveness in directing the Company. The Chair sets
the agenda for the Board and, in conjunction with the
Company Secretary, ensures that accurate, timely and
clear information is circulated to the Directors five working
days prior to the meeting. The Board has implemented
various policies and procedures to ensure the Company
runs effectively and efficiently.
An open, informed and transparent environment is
promoted at each Board meeting and the Chair maintains
open communication channels with the other Directors,
AIFM, Investment Adviser and Company Secretary between
Board meetings.
Senior Independent Director
The Senior Independent Director provides a sounding
board to the Chair, and serves as an intermediary for the
other directors and Shareholders.
Role of the Board
All Board members are independent non-executive
Directors, who continue to be independent of the AIFM
and Investment Adviser. The Board is responsible for the
governance of the Company, notwithstanding any delegation
of responsibilities to third parties. It has oversight over the
management and conduct of the Company’s business,
strategy and development. The Board determines the
Investment Objective and Investment Policy as well as risk
appetite and has overall responsibility for the Company’s
activities, including review of investment activity and
performance. The Board ensures the maintenance of a
sound system of internal controls and risk management
(including financial, operational and compliance controls)
and reviews the overall effectiveness of systems in place.
The Board is responsible for approval of any changes to
the capital, corporate and/or management structure of
the Company. The Board Members offer strategic guidance
and specialist advice; whilst providing constructive and
effective challenge, especially to the decisions of the
Investment Adviser. The Board scrutinises and assesses
the performance of third party service providers (including
the AIFM and Investment Adviser).
The principal objectives of the Board are the run-off of
the portfolio and the continuing evaluation of any strategic
proposals. The Board does not routinely involve itself in
day-to-day business decisions. The AIFM is responsible
for the risk management of the Company pursuant to
AIFMD and the Investment Adviser for portfolio management.
© 2024 AEET | 39
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
Appointment and Replacement of Board
The rules concerning the appointment and replacement
of Directors are contained in the Company’s Articles of
Association which require that a Director shall be subject
to election at the first AGM after appointment and re-
election at least every three years thereafter. However, in
accordance with the UK Corporate Governance Code, the
Board has resolved that all Directors shall stand for annual
re-election at each AGM.
Independent advice
A procedure has been adopted for Directors, in the
furtherance of their duties, to take independent professional
advice at the expense of the Company. No professional
advice has been independently sought during the year
ended 31 December 2024. The Directors have access to
the advice and services of the Company Secretary.
Role of Committees
The role of each Committee is described in their respective
terms of reference, which can be found on the Company’s
website.
COMPOSITION, SUCCESSION AND EVALUATION
Composition
At the date of this report, the Board consists of four
independent non-executive Directors including the Chair.
All of the Directors are independent of the Investment
Adviser and are able to allocate sufficient time to the
Company to discharge their responsibilities effectively.
The Directors have a broad range of relevant experience
to meet the Company’s requirements and their biographies
are shown on pages 35 and 36.
In line with the AIC Code, the Board has decided that
each Director should be subject to annual re-election by
Shareholders, although this is not required by the Company’s
Articles of Association.
The Board recommends that all the Directors should be
elected for the reasons highlighted in the Notice of Annual
General Meeting.
Board diversity
The Company’s policy is that the Board should have an
appropriate level of diversity in the boardroom with the
overriding aim of ensuring that the Board is composed of
the best combination of people for ensuring effective
oversight of the Company and constructive support and
challenge to the Investment Adviser. All Board appointments
will be made on merit and have regard to diversity including
factors such as ethnicity, gender, skills, background and
experience. There will be no discrimination on the grounds
of gender, religion, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age
or physical ability. As at 31 December 2024, the Company
had 4 Directors, 2 of whom were female and 2 of whom
were male. As at the date of this Report, the Company
has 4 Directors, 2 female and 2 male.
The Board takes account of the FCAs listing rule
(UKLR6.6.6R(9)(a)) concerning public disclosures on whether
a company has met the following targets on board diversity:
a) at least 40% of individuals on the board are women;
b) at least one of the senior board positions (defined by
the FCA as either the chair, senior independent director,
chief executive or chief financial officer) is held by a
woman; and
c) at least one individual on the board is from a minority
ethnic background.
As at 31 December 2024, the Board meets the criteria of
two of the three targets as a) 50% of the Board are
women, and b) the Chair of the Board is a woman. The
Board does not meet target c) as no Board members are
from a minority ethnic background. There have been no
new appointments to the Board in 2024, however, the
Board would seek to include candidates from minority
ethnic backgrounds on a short-list as part of the recruitment
of a new director.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
CONTINUED
40 | © 2024 AEET
The below tables set out the diversity data required under UKLR6.6.6R(10) as at 31 December 2024. As an externally
managed investment company, the Board employs no executive staff, and therefore does not have a chief executive officer
(CEO) or a chief financial officer (CFO), both of which are deemed senior board positions by the FCA.
The following information has been provided by each Director. There have been no changes since 31 December 2024.
Board diversity as at 31 December 2024
Gender
Number of
Board members
Percentage of
the Board
Number of
senior positions
on the Board
Men 2 50% 1
1
Women 2 50% 1
2
Prefer not to say
Ethnic background
Number of
Board members
Percentage of
the Board
Number of
senior positions
on the Board
White British or Other White (including minority white groups) 4 100% 2
1,2
1 David Fletcher is Senior Independent Director.
2 Miriam Greenwood is Chair of the Board.
Board tenure and succession
The Directors recognise that independence is not a function of service or age and that experience is an important
attribute within the Board. To ensure continuity, the Board has adopted a succession plan that allows for a gradual
refreshment. Accordingly, the Board may decide to recommend a Director with more than nine years’ service for
re-election at the Company’s AGM.
Performance evaluation
A formal annual performance evaluation was conducted on the Board, the Chairman, the Committees, the Investment
Manager, and the main service providers for the year ended 31 December 2024. The evaluation was conducted by the
Company Secretary with the oversight of the Chair and Senior Independent Director.
The results of the Board performance evaluation were positive and demonstrated that the Directors were committed
to the fulfilment of their duties and with a high level of engagement.
A policy of insurance against Directors’ and Officers’ liabilities is maintained by the Company.
AUDIT, RISK AND INTERNAL CONTROL
Audit
The Audit and Risk Committee monitors the performance, objectivity and independence of the external auditors and this
is assessed before the approval of the Annual Report. In evaluating the Auditors’ performance, the Audit and Risk Committee
examines the robustness of the audit process, the independence and objectivity of the auditor and the quality of delivery.
The members of the Audit and Risk Committee satisfy themselves that the Annual Report taken as a whole is fair, balanced
and understandable. The assessment of the performance during the year ended 31 December 2024 and the judgements,
estimates and assumptions made throughout the Annual Report are considered formally as a committee agenda item.
© 2024 AEET | 41
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
Risk
The Directors confirm that they have carried out a robust
assessment of the principal risks facing the Company,
including those that would threaten its business model,
future performance, solvency or liquidity. The principal
risks and how they are being managed are set out in the
Strategic Report on pages 4 to 27.
Internal control
The AIC Code requires the Board to review the effectiveness
of the Company’s system of internal controls. The Board
recognises its ultimate responsibility for the Company’s
system of internal controls and for monitoring its
effectiveness. The system of internal controls is designed
to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to
achieve business objectives. It can provide only reasonable
assurance against material misstatement or loss. The Board
has undertaken a review of the aspects covered by the
guidance and has identified risk management controls in
the key areas of business objectives, accounting, compliance,
operations and secretarial as being matters of particular
importance upon which it requires reports from the relevant
key service providers. The Board believes that the existing
arrangements, set out below, represent an appropriate
framework to meet the internal control requirements. The
Directors reviewed the effectiveness of the internal control
system throughout the year ended 31 December 2024.
Financial aspects of internal control
These are detailed in the Report of the Audit and Risk
Committee on page 49.
Other aspects of internal control
The Board will hold at least four regular meetings each
year, plus additional meetings as required. Between these
meetings there is regular contact with the AIFM, the
Investment Adviser, the Administrator and Company
Secretary.
The Administrator and Company Secretary, Apex Listed
Companies Services (UK) Limited, reports separately in
writing to the Board concerning risks and internal control
matters within its remit, including internal financial control
procedures and company secretarial matters. Additional
ad hoc reports are received as required and Directors have
access at all times to the advice and services of the Company
Secretary, which is responsible to the Board for ensuring
that Board procedures are followed and that applicable
rules and regulations are complied with. Contact with the
Investment Adviser, the AIFM and the Administrator enable
the Board to monitor the Company’s progress towards its
objectives and encompass an analysis of the risks involved.
The effectiveness of the Company’s risk management and
internal controls systems is monitored regularly and a
formal review, utilising a detailed risk assessment programme,
takes place at least annually. This includes review of the
internal controls and the reports of the Administrator, the
AIFM and the Registrar.
Based on the work of the Audit and Risk Committee, and
the reviews of the reports received by the Audit and Risk
Committee on behalf of the Board, the Board has concluded
that there were no material control failures during the
year under review and up to the date of this report.
REMUNERATION
The Remuneration Committee comprises all the Directors
of the Board. It meets at least annually and is responsible
for considering and making appropriate recommendations
to the Board in relation to Directors’ remuneration.
The Company does not have any executive Directors or
employees, and, as a result, operates a simple and transparent
remuneration policy with no variable element, that reflects
the non-executive Directors’ duties, responsibilities and
time spent.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
CONTINUED
42 | © 2024 AEET
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
Annual Chair’s Statement
I am pleased to present the Remuneration Committee
(the “Committee”) report for the year ended 31 December
2024. It is set out in two sections:
a) Remuneration Policy – a summary of our current and
future Policy which was last approved at the Company’s
General Meeting in July 2022 and which will be put
to Shareholders, as a binding vote by way of an ordinary
resolutions at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting
(AGM”) to be held on 28 May 2025. The below stated
Remuneration Policy remains unchanged from the
Remuneration Policy last placed before Shareholders
at the Company’s AGM held in 2022, except for one
minor change; it has been updated to clarify that the
Chair of the Board, each Committee Chair and theSenior
Independent Director will receive a higher fee in
recognition of their additional duties;
b) Remuneration Implementation Report – a description
on how the Directors’ Remuneration Policy has been
implemented during the year under review. The
Remuneration Implementation Report is put forward
for approval by Shareholders on an annual basis.
The Remuneration Committee Report for the year to
31December 2024 has been prepared in accordance with
sections 420-422 of the Act, Schedule 8 of the Large and
Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and
Reports) Regulations 2008, as amended (the Regulations)
and the Listing Rules. The law requires the Company’s
auditor to audit certain sections of the Remuneration
Report; where this is the case, the relevant section has
been indicated as such. The Remuneration Committee
met twice during the year under review.
General Meeting approval of the Remuneration Policy
and Remuneration Implementation Report
The Company’s Remuneration Policy was approved by
Shareholders at the Company’s General Meeting on
25 July 2022. In accordance with the requirements of
Schedule 8 of the Large and Medium-sized Companies
and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008,
asamended (the Regulations), the Remuneration Policy
is required to be put to Shareholders for approval every
three years, unless a material variation to the Remuneration
Policy is proposed, in which case Shareholder approval
will be sought to amend the policy.
Remuneration Policy
Directors are remunerated in the form of fees, in respect
of their appointments as non-executive Directors of the
Company and as non-executive Directors of Attika Holdings
Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, with
the split of fees between these appointments agreed
between the parties in writing. Directors’ fees are payable
in quarterly instalments in arrears. The Company’s Articles
of Association limit the fees payable to the Directors in
aggregate to £500,000 per annum. Subject to the overall
limit, the Company’s policy is that the fees payable to the
Directors should reflect the time spent by the Board on
the Company’s affairs and the responsibilities borne by
the Directors and should be sufficient to promote the
long-term success of the Company. All Directors, including
any new appointments to the Board, are paid at the same
rate, apart from the Chair of the Board (who is also Chair
of the Nomination Committee), the Chair of the Audit
and Risk Committee, the Chair of the Remuneration
Committee, the Chair of the Management Engagement
Committee and the Senior Independent Director, who are
paid a higher fee in recognition of their additional
responsibilities. As provided for in clause 107 of the Articles
of Association and in accordance with the relevant provisions
of the AIC Code, as well as each Director’s appointment
letter, the Directors are entitled to an additional fee where
a Director undertakes any special duties, or services outside
their ordinary duties as a Director.
The policy is to review fee rates annually, although such
review will not necessarily result in any change to the
rates. As part of this process reference is made to the fees
paid to the directors of other similar investment trust
companies.
Consideration of Shareholders’ Views
The General Meeting which was held on 25 July 2022
was the first opportunity for Shareholders to vote on the
Directors’ Remuneration Policy. The Remuneration Policy
was approved with 99.93% votes in favour.
Effective Date
The Remuneration Policy was effective from 25 July 2022,
being the date at which the Policy was approved by
Shareholders at the Company’s General Meeting. At the
Annual General Meeting on 12 June 2024 the Directors’
Remuneration Report as set out in the 2023 Annual Report
was approved with 99.92% in favour.
© 2024 AEET | 43
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
CONTINUED
Remuneration Implementation Report
Directors’ remuneration
During the year ended 31 December 2024, the Remuneration
Committee undertook a review of Directors’ fees.
With effect from 1 July 2024 each of the Directors was
entitled to receive a fee of £44,899 per annum (31 December
2023: £43,676) with the Chair of the Board (who is also
Chair of the Nomination Committee) entitled to receive
an additional fee of £27,389 per annum (31 December
2023: £26,643). With effect from 1 July 2024, the Chair
of the Audit & Risk Committee, who is also the Senior
Independent Director of the Company received an
additional total fee of £11,613 per annum (31 December
2023: £11,297 ). The Chair of the Remuneration Committee,
appointed with effect from 1 July 2024 received an
additional £6,607 per annum (31 December 2023: £5,902
for her additional Board and Committee engagement
work prior to appointment). The Chair of the Management
Engagement Committee received an additional £6,607
per annum (31 December 2023: £5,902). All these fees
represented an increase of 2.8% over the previous year.
Each of the Directors’ fees are in respect of their
appointment as a non-executive director of the Company
and their appointment as non-executive director of
Attika Holdings Limited. The Board also considered that
the split of Directors’ fees between the Company and
Attika Holdings Limited of 70%/30% respectively remained
appropriate with effect from 1 July 2024.
The Board believes that the level of increase and resulting
fees appropriately reflect the level of demands on the
individual Directors, prevailing market rates for an
investment trust of the Company’s size and complexity,
the increasing complexity of regulation and resultant
time spent by the Directors on matters, and it will also
enable the Company to continue to attract appropriately
experienced Directors in the future.
Directors receive fixed fees and do not receive bonuses
or other performance related remuneration, share options,
pension contributions or other benefits apart from the
reimbursement of allowable expenses. No commissions
or performance related payments will be made to the
Directors by the Company.
No Director has waived or agreed to waive any emoluments
from the Company or any subsidiary undertaking.
The decision by Shareholders to vote against Continuation
at the end of February 2023 meant that the duties of
the Directors have been beyond those normally expected
as part of their appointment. Therefore, in accordance
with Principal 8 of the AIC Code it was decided that
provision should be made for additional fees. In view of
the additional duties and responsibilities, the Remuneration
Committee decided, immediately following the Continuation
Vote and before detailed work commenced on reviewing
the options to implement Shareholders’ wishes, to increase
with effect from 1 March 2023 the monthly fees of the
Chair of the Board and the Chair of the Audit & Risk
Committee by £2,500 and £1,900 respectively and by
£1,150 for the Chair of the Management Engagement
Committee and £1,010 for the other non-executive
Director. This was set out in detail in the Remuneration
Report within the Annual Report for the year ended
31 December 2022.
On 1 July 2023, and taking into account the approval by
Shareholders of the Managed Run Off resolution at the
June 2023 Annual General Meeting, and the review of
strategic options for the portfolio, including the possible
sale of assets and other options, these monthly fees were
maintained and increased to £2,930 for the Chair of the
Board, £2,291 for the Chair of Audit & Risk Committee,
Chair of the Remuneration Committee and Senior
Independent Director and £1,239 for the other Directors.
With effect from 1 July 2024, the additional monthly
fees were maintained and increased to £3,012 for the
Chair of the Board, £2,355 for the Chair of the Audit &
Risk Committee and £1,699 for each of the Remuneration
and Management Engagement Committee Chairs.
The standard fees for Directors are reviewed annually
and the additional monthly fees are subject to regular
review.
44 | © 2024 AEET
Directors’ Remuneration
The table below (audited) provides a single figure for the total remuneration of each Director.
Fees for the Fees for the
year ended year ended
Date of 31 December Taxable 31 December
appointment to
2024
1
benefits Total
2023
1
the Board (£) (£) (£) (£)
Miriam Greenwood
19 April 2021
106,954
106,954
92,852
Nicholas Bliss
9 April 2021
67,902
67,902
59,794
David Fletcher
29 April 2022
83,613
83,613
71,861
Janine Freeman
2 November 2022
67,902
67,9 02
56,512
Total
326,371
326,371
281,019
1 Including fees in respect of directorships in Attika Holdings Limited.
No additional expenses were paid to the Directors (2023: nil). None of the above fees were paid to third parties.
The annual percentage change in remuneration in respect of the financial years prior to the current year in respect of
each Director is as follows:
% change % change % change
2023 to 2024 2022 to 2023
2021 to 2022
1
Miriam Greenwood
15.19
61.24
2
Nicholas Bliss
13.56
41.60
3
David Fletcher
16.35
135.17
4
Janine Freeman
20.16
750.83
5
1 The fees received for the period to 31 December 2021 and the year to 31 December 2022 are not comparable as they cover different durations and two Directors joined the
Board in 2022. Accordingly, a year-on-year percentage change has not been included in the table above.
2 The 61.24% increase in 2023 for Miriam Greenwood arose mainly from the introduction of an additional monthly fee to reflect the extra duties and responsibilities as Chair of
the Board arising from the failed continuation vote at the end of February 2023, the approval of the Managed Run Off resolution at the end of June 2023 and the continuing
review of strategic options for the portfolio as detailed in this Remuneration Report.
3 The 41.60% increase in 2023 for Nicholas Bliss arose mainly from the introduction of an additional monthly fee to reflect the extra duties and responsibilities arising from the
failed continuation vote at the end of February 2023, the approval of the Managed Run Off resolution at the end of June 2023 and the continuing review of strategic options for
the portfolio as detailed in this Remuneration Report.
4 The 135.17% increase in 2023 for David Fletcher arose mainly from (i) his appointment part way through 2022 (29 April 2022) (ii) the introduction of an additional monthly fee
to reflect the extra duties and responsibilities arising from the failed continuation vote at the end of February 2023, the approval of the Managed Run Off resolution at the end
of June 2023 and the continuing review of strategic options for the portfolio and (iii) his appointment to the role of Senior Independent Director of the Board on 1 July 2023 as
detailed in this Remuneration Report.
5 The 750.83% increase in 2023 for Janine Freeman arose mainly from (i) her appointment part way through the year as a Director on 2 November 2022 (ii) the introduction of
an additional monthly fee to reflect the extra duties and responsibilities arising from the failed continuation vote at the end of February 2023, the approval of the Managed Run
Off resolution at the end of June 2023 and the continuing review of strategic options for the portfolio and (iii) to reflect her role and particular involvement on the Audit & Risk
Committee as detailed in the Remuneration Report in the 2023 Annual Report.
Directors’ Service Contracts, Term and Loss of Office
The Directors do not have service contracts with the Company.
The Directors have appointment letters which provide for
an initial term of three years. In accordance with the AIC
Code, each member of the Board will seek annual re-election
by Shareholders at the AGM. There are no agreements in
place to compensate the Board for loss of office.
Directors’ Indemnities
Subject to the provisions of the Act, the Company has
agreed to indemnify each Director against all liabilities which
any Director may suffer or incur arising out of or in connection
with any claim made or proceedings taken against him, or
any application made by him, on the grounds of his negligence,
default, breach of duty or breach of trust in relation to the
Company or any associated company.
© 2024 AEET | 45
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
CONTINUED
Performance
The following chart shows the Company’s share price (total return) by comparison to the FTSE All share index for the
period since the Company commenced operations on 2 June 2021. The Company does not have a specific benchmark
but has deemed the FTSE All share index to be the most appropriate comparator for its performance.
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
2/6/2021 31/12/21 31/12/2331/12/22 31/12/24
Share price total return FTSE All-Share Index
Total return rebased to 100 at date commencement of operations on 2 June 2021
Relative Importance of Spend on Pay
The following table sets out the total level of Directors’ remuneration compared to the distributions to Shareholders by
way of dividends and share buybacks.
31 December
2024
£‘000
31 December
2023
£‘000
change
%
Directors’ fees payable 326 281 16.0
Dividends paid to Shareholders 4,999 1,250
Repurchase of shares via a Tender Offer 17,5 0 0
Total Distribution to Shareholders 22,499 1,250 1,699.9
The disclosure of the information in the table above is required under The Large and Medium-sized Companies and
Groups (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulations2013.
Directors’ Share Interests
The Company’s Articles of Association do not require Directors to own shares in the Company. The Shares held by
Directors, including those of connected persons, at the beginning and end of the financial year are set out below.
31 December 2024 31 December 2023
Director
Connected
person Total Director
Connected
person Total
Miriam Greenwood
19,181 19,181 24,000 24,000
David Fletcher
38,598 12,832 51,430 42,425 14,181 56,606
Nicholas Bliss
16,280 16,280 20,000 20,000
Janine Freeman
The information in the above table has been audited. There have been no changes following the year end.
46 | © 2024 AEET
Remuneration Consultants
Remuneration Consultants were not engaged by the
Company during the year under review and in respect of
the Remuneration Report.
Recruitment Agencies
The Board has not paid and will not pay any incentive fees
to any person to encourage them to become a director
of the Company.
Statement
On behalf of the Board and in accordance with Part 2 of
Schedule 8 of the Large and Medium-sized Companies
and Groups (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulations
2013, I confirm that the above Remuneration Policy and
Remuneration Implementation Report summarises,
as applicable, for the year ended 31 December 2024:
a) the major decisions on Directors’ remuneration;
b) any substantial changes relating to Directors’ remuneration
made; and
c) the context in which the changes occurred and decisions
have been taken.
Janine Freeman
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
28 April 2025
© 2024 AEET | 47
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
REPORT OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE
Introduction
I am pleased to present the Audit and Risk Committee (the
Committee”) report for the year ended 31 December 2024.
At least once a year the Committee Chair meets with the
external Auditors without any representative of the Investment
Adviser or Administrator being present. The Committee’s
effectiveness is reviewed on an annual basis as part of the
Board’s performance evaluation process (see page 41).
Role and Composition
The role of the Committee is to ensure that Shareholder
interests are properly protected in relation to the application
of financial reporting and internal control principles and
to assess the effectiveness of the audit. The Committee’s
role and responsibilities are set out in full in its terms of
reference which are available on request from the Company
Secretary and can be found on the Company’s website
(www.aquila-energy-efficiency-trust.com). A summary of
the Committee’s main responsibilities and how it has
fulfilled them is set out below. Review of the Company’s
internal control and risk management fall within the terms
of reference of the Committee.
The Committee comprises all the Directors and the Board
is satisfied that the Committee has sufficient and recent
financial experience, and as a whole, has competence
relevant to the sector in which the Company operates to
discharge its functions effectively. In accordance with the
AIC Code, the Chair of the Board is a member of the Audit
Committee as she was independent on appointment and
she remains so. The experience of the members of the
Committee can be assessed from the Director’s biographies
set out on pages 35 and 36.
Main Activities of the Committee
The Committee met formally five times during the year under
review and twice after the year-end. PwC, the external
Auditors, attended three meetings in 2024 and twice after
the year-end. The AIFMs risk function provided reports on
their monitoring programme for these meetings.
The matters considered, monitored and reviewed by the
Committee during the course of the year under review
included the following:
a detailed analysis of the Group and Company’s semi-
annual NAVs and underlying assumptions;
monitored the Group and Company’s reserves and
reviewed the Group and Company’s net income, cash
position and cash flow forecasts and recommended
appropriate dividend levels and the tender offer level
to the Board;
monitored and reviewed the Group and Company’s
emerging and principal risks and internal controls;
considered the ongoing assessment of the Group and
Company as a going concern;
considered the appointment, independence, objectivity
and remuneration of the Auditor;
reviewed the audit plan;
approved the accounting principles including the
investment entity status, the valuation methodology
including fair value and amortised cost;
monitored the preparation and timetable for the
production of the Annual Report & Accounts;
monitored the integrity of the financial statements of
the Group and Company, including its annual and
half-yearly reports, and any other formal announcements
relating to its financial performance, and reviewed and
reported to the Board on significant financial reporting
issues and judgements contained within them; and
considered the financial and other implications on the
independence of the auditor arising from the provision
of non-audit services.
Following the proposed distribution of capital to Shareholders
referred to in the Chair’s statement on page 5 the Board
is reviewing all its costs with a view to reducing them to
a level more appropriate for the size of the Group and
Company.
Going Concern
The Committee reviewed the Groups and Company’s going
concern assessment and concluded that although there are
conditions that indicate the existence of material uncertainty
which may cast significant doubt about the Group’s and
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, it is
appropriate for the Groups and Company’s financial statements
to be prepared on a going concern basis as described in the
Directors’ Report on page31.
Internal Control and Risk
During the year under review, the Committee together
with the AIFM and other service providers carefully
considered the Company’s matrix of risks and uncertainties
(including emerging risks) and appropriate mitigating
actions. The procedure for identifying emerging risks can
be found on page 19 and the Company’s principal risks
can be found on pages 20 to 23.
The Committee also considered the internal control reports
of its AIFM, Investment Adviser, Administrator and Registrar.
The Committee reviewed these reports and concluded
that there were no significant control weaknesses or other
issues that needed to be brought to the Board’s attention.
48 | © 2024 AEET
Financial Aspects of Internal Control
The Directors are responsible for the internal financial control
systems of the Group and Company and for reviewing their
effectiveness. The aim of the internal financial control system
is to ensure the maintenance of proper accounting records,
the reliability of the financial information upon which business
decisions are made and used for publication, and that the
assets of the Group and Company are safeguarded.
The Board has contractually delegated to external agencies
the services the Group and Company requires, but they are
fully informed of the internal control framework established
by each relevant service provider which provide reasonable
assurance on the effectiveness of internal financial controls.
The Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities in respect of the
financial statements is on page 51 and a Statement of Going
Concern is on page 31. The Report of the Independent
Auditor is on pages 52 to 59.
Financial Statements and Significant Accounting
Matters
The Committee reviewed the financial statements and
considered the following significant accounting issues in
relation to the Group and Company’s financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2024.
Investment Entity Status
As a result of the development of the portfolio of investments,
the actual investments made and the structure of those
investments, many of which were receivables purchase
investments with fixed rates of return, the Committee
determined that this required judgement and re-assessment
of the Company’s investment entity status for the year
ended 31 December 2022. As a result of this re-assessment,
which identified that fixed rate of return investments
constituted a substantial proportion of the pipeline of
investments and resultant actual investments, the Committee
determined that as from 1 January 2022 the Company
was no longer an investment entity. This has continued
to be the position in 2023 and 2024.
Valuation and Existence of Investments
The Group’s and Company’s accounting policy is to
designate investments at fair value through profit or loss,
or at amortised cost less expected credit loss provisions,
whichever is appropriate, adjusted by any foreign exchange
differences. Investments with variable returns are measured
at fair value and investments with a fixed return structure
are measured at amortised cost. Therefore, the most
significant risk in the Group and Company’s financial
statements is the carrying value of the Group and Company’s
investments because fair values, the effective interest
method and expected credit loss provisions have been
arrived at using a number of judgments. The Committee
reviewed the procedures in place for ensuring the accurate
valuation and existence of investments and approved the
valuation of the Company’s investments and their existence
at the year-end with the Investment Adviser, the AIFM
and other service providers.
The Board has approved a Valuation Policy which sets out
the valuation process. The process includes a valuation by
the Investment Adviser of the Group and Company’s
investments on an annual basis as at 31 December each
year. Thesevaluations are updated as at 30 June each
year. The valuation principles used to calculate the fair
value of the assets are based on International Private Equity
and Venture Capital Valuation Guidelines.
Fair value for each investment is derived from the present
value of the investment’s expected future cash flows,
using reasonable assumptions and forecasts for revenues
and operating costs, and an appropriate discount rate.
For those investments measured at amortised cost the
Company has used the effective interest method and has
calculated an expected credit loss provision in accordance
with IFRS 9.
The Audit and Risk Committee has satisfied itself with the
investment valuation, the calculation of amortised cost
values and expected credit loss provisions.
Recognition of Income
Income may not be accrued correctly. Calculations of
investment income using the effective income method
have been provided to the Company by the Investment
Adviser. The Committee reviewed the Administrator’s
procedures for recognition of income and reviewed the
treatment of income receivable in the year under review.
Tax Status
The Company may suffer tax on gains on the realisation
of investments if investment trust status is not maintained.
The Committee reviewed the compliance of the Company
during the year under review, against the eligibility
conditions and ongoing requirements it must meet in
order for investment trust status to be maintained.
Calculation of the Investment Adviser’s Fees
The Committee reviewed the Investment Adviser’s fees
and concluded that they have been correctly calculated.
Details of the Investment Advisers fees can be found in
note 6 to the financial statements.
© 2024 AEET | 49
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
Internal Audit
The Committee has considered the need for an internal
audit function and considers that this is not appropriate
given the nature and circumstances of the Company as an
externally managed investment company with external
service providers. The Committee keeps the need for an
internal audit function under periodic review.
Audit Arrangements
PwC was selected as the Company’s auditor at the time
of the Company’s launch. The auditor was formally engaged
in November 2021. This is Richard McGuire’s fourth year
as the Company’s audit partner. The appointment of the
auditor will be reviewed annually by the Committee and
the Board and is subject to approval by Shareholders. In
accordance with the Financial Reporting Council’s (“FRC)
guidance, the audit will be put out to tender within ten
years of the initial appointment of PwC. Additionally, the
Senior Statutory Auditor must be rotated every five years
and is next eligible for rotation in 2026.
The audit plan was presented to the Committee at its
November 2024 meeting, ahead of the commencement
of the Company’s year-end audit. The audit plan sets out
the audit process, materiality, scope and significant risks.
Auditors’ Independence
The Audit and Risk Committee considered the independence
of the auditor and the objectivity of the audit process and
is satisfied that PwC has fulfilled its obligations to
Shareholders and as independent auditor to the Company
for the year ended 31 December 2024.
The Audit and Risk Committee is satisfied that there are
no issues in respect of the independence of the auditors.
Effectiveness of External Audit
The Committee is responsible for reviewing the effectiveness
of the external audit process. The Committee received a
presentation of the audit plan from the external auditor
prior to the commencement of the audit and a presentation
of the results of the audit following completion of the
main audit testing. Additionally, the Committee received
feedback from the Company Secretary, Administrator,
AIFM and Investment Adviser regarding the effectiveness
of the external audit process. Following the above review,
the Committee has agreed that the re-appointment of
the auditors should be recommended to the Board and
to the Shareholders of the Company.
Provision of Non-audit Services
The Audit and Risk Committee has reviewed the FRCs
Revised Ethical Standard 2019 Guidance on Audit Committees
and has formulated a policy on the provision of non-audit
services by the Company’s auditor. The Audit and Risk
Committee has determined that the Company’s appointed
auditor will not be considered for the provision of certain
non-audit services, such as accounting and preparation of
the financial statements, internal audit and custody. The
auditor may, if required, provide other non-audit services,
however, and this will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
PwC was not engaged to provide non-audit services to the
Company during the year ended 31 December 2024.
Conclusion with Respect to the Annual Report
The production and audit of the Company’s Annual Report
is a comprehensive process requiring input from different
contributors. In order to reach the conclusion that the
Annual Report when taken as a whole is fair, balanced and
understandable, the Board has requested that the Committee
advises on whether it considers these criteria have been
satisfied. In so doing the Committee has considered the
following:
the control framework around the production of the
Annual Report;
the extensive levels of review undertaken in the
production process, by the Investment Adviser and the
Committee; and
the internal control environment as operated by the
Investment Adviser and other suppliers including any
checks and balances within those systems.
As a result of the work performed, the Committee has
concluded that the Annual Report and Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2024, taken as a whole,
are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the
information necessary for Shareholders to assess the
Company’s performance, business model and strategy,
and it has reported on these findings and provided such
conclusion to the Board.
David Fletcher
Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee
28 April 2025
REPORT OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE
CONTINUED
50 | © 2024 AEET
STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES IN RESPECT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual
Report and the financial statements in accordance with
applicable law and regulation.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial
statements for each financial year. Under that law the
Directors have prepared the Group and the Company
financial statements in accordance with UK-adopted
international accounting standards in conformity with the
requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
Under company law, directors must not approve the
financial statements unless they are satisfied that they
give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group
and Company and of the profit or loss of the Group and
Company for that period. In preparing the financial
statements, the Directors are required to:
select suitable accounting policies and then apply them
consistently;
state whether applicable UK-adopted international
accounting standards have been followed, subject to
any material departures disclosed and explained in the
financial statements;
make judgements and accounting estimates that are
reasonable and prudent; and
prepare the financial statements on the going concern
basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the
Group and Company will continue in business.
The Directors are responsible for safeguarding the assets
of the Group and Company and hence for taking reasonable
steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other
irregularities.
The Directors are also responsible for keeping adequate
accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain
the Groups and Company’s transactions and disclose with
reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of
the Group and Company and enable them to ensure that
the financial statements and the Directors’ Remuneration
Report comply with the Companies Act 2006.
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and
integrity of the Company’s website. Legislation in the
United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination
of financial statements may differ from legislation in
otherjurisdictions.
Directors’ Confirmations
The Directors consider that the Annual Report and financial
statements, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and
understandable and provides the information necessary
for Shareholders to assess the Groups and Company’s
position and performance, business model and strategy.
Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are
listed in the Corporate Governance section confirm that,
to the best of their knowledge:
the Group and Company financial statements, which
have been prepared in accordance with UK-adopted
international accounting standards in conformity with
the requirements of the Companies Act 2006, give a
true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial
position and profit of the Group and profit of the
Company; and
the Strategic Report includes a fair review of the
development and performance of the business and
the position of the Group and Company, together with
a description of the principal risks and uncertainties
that it faces.
In the case of each Director in office at the date the
Directors’ report is approved:
so far as the Director is aware, there is no relevant
audit information of which the Groups and Companys
auditors are unaware; and
they have taken all the steps that they ought to have
taken as a Director in order to make themselves aware
of any relevant audit information and to establish that
the Groups and Company’s auditors are aware of that
information.
For and on behalf of the Board,
Miriam Greenwood OBE DL
Chair of the Board
28 April 2025
© 2024 AEET | 51
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF AQUILA ENERGY EFFICIENCY TRUST PLC
Report on the audit of the financial statements
Opinion
In our opinion, Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust Plc’s Group financial
statements and Company financial statements (the “financial
statements”):
give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the
Company’s affairs as at 31 December 2024 and of the Group’s
and Company’s loss and the Group’s and Company’s cash flows
for the year then ended;
have been properly prepared in accordance with UK-adopted
international accounting standards; and
have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the
Companies Act 2006.
We have audited the financial statements, included within the Annual
Report, which comprise: the Consolidated Statement of Financial
Position and the Company Statement of Financial Position as at 31
December 2024; the Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and
Comprehensive Income, the Company Statement of Profit or Loss
and Comprehensive Income, the Consolidated Statement of Changes
in Equity, the Company Statement of Changes in Equity, the Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows and the Company Statement of Cash Flows
for the year then ended; and the Notes to the Financial Statements,
comprising material accounting policy information and other
explanatory information.
Our opinion is consistent with our reporting to the Audit and Risk
Committee.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards
on Auditing (UK) (“ISAs (UK)”) and applicable law. Our responsibilities
under ISAs (UK) are further described in the Auditors’ responsibilities
for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Independence
We remained independent of the Group in accordance with the
ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial
statements in the UK, which includes the FRC’s Ethical Standard, as
applicable to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our
other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
To the best of our knowledge and belief, we declare that non-audit
services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not provided.
We have provided no non-audit services to the Company or its
controlled undertakings in the period under audit.
Material uncertainty related to going concern
In forming our opinion on the financial statements, which is not
modified, we have considered the adequacy of the disclosure made
in note 2 to the financial statements concerning the Group’s and the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company
held a continuation vote in February 2023, which did not pass. At
the Annual General Meeting of the Company (the“AGM”) held on
14 June 2023, Shareholders voted in favour of the Company’s change
of investment policy (the “New Investment Policy”). Following the
AGM, and in accordance with the New Investment Policy, the Company
entered a continuation and managed run-off of its portfolio (“Managed
Run-Off”), meaning that it is not making any new investments (save
52 | © 2024 AEET
for the limited circumstances as set out in the New Investment Policy)
and its investing activity is solely in respect of funding legal commitments
to existing investments. The Company is operating currently under
a Managed Run-Off with the term of some of the Company’s assets
being of several years. While the Company is continuing to explore
other strategic options, there remains no certainty that any of these
options will materialise and be put to Shareholders for consideration.
These conditions, along with the other matters explained in note 2
to the financial statements, indicate the existence of a material
uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about the Group’s and
the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial
statements do not include the adjustments that would result if the
Group and the Company were unable to continue as a going concern.
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the
Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the
preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
Our evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Group’s and the
Company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of
accounting included:
Obtained the Directors’ going concern assessment and corroborated
key assumptions to underlying documentation and ensured this
was consistent with our audit work in these areas;
Assessed the appropriateness of the key assumptions used both
in the base case and downside scenarios, including assessing
whether we considered the downside sensitivities to be
appropriatelysevere;
Tested the integrity of the underlying formulae and calculations
within the going concern and cash flow models; and
Considered the appropriateness of the mitigating actions available
to the Directors in the event of the downside scenario materialising.
Specifically, we focused on whether these actions are within the
Directors’ control and are achievable.
In relation to the Directors’ reporting on how they have applied the
UK Corporate Governance Code, other than the material uncertainty
identified in note 2 to the financial statements, we have nothing
material to add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors’
statement in the financial statements about whether the Directors
considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of
accounting, or in respect of the Directors’ identification in the financial
statements of any other material uncertainties to the Group’s and
the Company’s ability to continue to do so over a period of at least
twelve months from the date of approval of the financial statements.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with
respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of
this report.
Our audit approach
Overview
Audit scope
The Company invests in energy efficient investments through its
investments in its subsidiaries, Attika Holdings Limited and one
compartment of SPV Project 2013 S.r.l.;
The Company is an Investment Trust Company and has appointed
Aquila Capital Investmentgesellschaft mbH (the “Investment
Adviser”) to manage its assets, and;
The financial statements are prepared for the Group by Apex
Listed Companies Services (UK) Limited (the “Administrator”) to
whom the provision of certain administrative functions has been
delegated. The Group audit team performed all the work and
did not use component auditors.
Key audit matters
Material uncertainty related to going concern
Valuation of investments held at fair value through profit or loss
(Group)
Carrying value of investments at amortised cost (Group)
Investment in subsidiary held at fair value through profit or loss
(Company)
Materiality
Overall Group materiality: £1,393,000 (2023: £1,886,000) based
on 2% of net assets.
Overall Company materiality: £1,323,000 (2023: £1,791,000)
based on 2% of net assets capped at 95% of Group materiality.
Performance materiality: £1,045,000 (2023: £1,414,000) (Group)
and £992,000 (2023: £1,344,000) (Company).
The scope of our audit
As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed
the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements.
© 2024 AEET | 53
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF AQUILA ENERGY EFFICIENCY TRUST PLC
CONTINUED
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditors’ professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the financial
statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud)
identified by the auditors, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit;
and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters, and any comments we make on the results of our procedures thereon,
were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide
a separate opinion on these matters.
In addition to going concern, described in the Material uncertainty related to going concern section above, we determined the matters
described below to be the key audit matters to be communicated in our report. This is not a complete list of all risks identified by our audit.
The key audit matters below are consistent with last year.
Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Valuation of investments held at fair value through profit or loss
(Group)
The Group holds energy efficient investments through its subsidiaries
Attika Holdings Limited and SPV Project 2013 S.r.l. These underlying
investments held in Attika Holdings Limited and SPV Project 2013
S.r.l. are either held at fair value through profit or loss or at amortised
cost. The investments at fair value of the Group are £10,022k. The
fair value of the investments have principally been valued on a
discounted cash flow basis, which necessitates significant estimates
in respect of the forecasted cash flows and discount rates applied.
Determining the valuation methodology and determining the inputs
and assumptions within the valuations are subjective and complex.
This, combined with the significance of the investments at fair value
through profit or loss balance in the consolidated statement of financial
position, meant that this was a key audit matter for our current
yearaudit.
We planned our audit to critically assess management’s assumptions
and the investment valuation models in which they are applied. We
have assessed whether the valuation methodology adopted for the
investments held at fair value through profit and loss was appropriate
and in line with accounting standards and industry guidelines. For a
sample of investments at fair value, we performed the following
procedures:
We tested the mathematical accuracy of the valuation models;
We engaged our internal valuation experts to provide audit support
in reviewing and concluding on the fair valuation of a sample of
the investments held at fair value. Our internal valuations experts
developed an independent range to benchmark against management’s
discount rates taking into account items such as country risk
premia and price risk exposure which vary depending on the asset;
and
We agreed the key valuation drivers to relevant supporting
documentation. Specifically, we have agreed a sample of inputs
driving the revenue in the underlying models to supporting
documentation such as signed contracts.
No material issues were identified in our audit testing.
54 | © 2024 AEET
Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Carrying value of investments at amortised cost (Group)
As stated above, the Group holds energy efficient investments through
its subsidiaries Attika Holdings Limited and through SPV Project 2013
S.r.l. These underlying investments held in Attika Holdings Limited
and SPV Project 2013 S.r.l. are either held at fair value through profit
or loss or at amortised cost. The investments at amortised cost of the
Group are £46,309k. The amount is net of the allowance for expected
credit losses in accordance with IFRS 9. The impairment assessment
requires estimates and judgements to be applied by the Directors,
especially around expected credit loss allowance under IFRS 9, such
that changes to key inputs to the estimates and/or judgements made
may result in a material change to the carrying value. These factors
combined with the significance of the investments at amortised cost
balance in the consolidated statement of financial position, meant
that this was a key audit matter for our current year audit.
We understood and evaluated the methodology and assumptions
applied, by reference to IFRS 9 and industry practice, and tested the
techniques used, in determining the amortised cost and recognition
of any expected credit loss. For a sample of investments at amortised
cost, we performed the following procedures:
We obtained confirmations of the investments or performed
alternative procedures such as agreeing to supporting documentation,
where applicable;
We assessed key assumptions used, such as those relating to
when a significant increase in credit risk has occurred;
We assessed the key parameters within the expected credit loss
model such as the probabilities of default and loss given default; and
We tested the mathematical accuracy of the amortised cost
models.
No material issues were identified in our audit testing.
Investment in subsidiary held at fair value through profit or loss
(Company)
The Company’s investment in subsidiaries is held at £38,399k between
an investment in Attika Holdings Limited of £9,048k held at cost less
impairment and an investment in one compartment of SPV Project
2013 S.r.l (the “Italian SPV”) of £29,351k held at fair value through
profit or loss. The fair value of the Italian SPV as at 31 December 2024
has been determined through an aggregation of the fair value of the
Italian SPV’s individual investments adjusted for the cash and liabilities
of the Italian SPV at 31 December 2024. The fair values of the Italian
SPV’s individual investments take account of projections of future
cash flows and discount rates which seek to take account of the risk
profile of the counterparty and other areas of judgment. The valuation
of the investment in the Italian SPV was identified as a key audit matter
given the components of the underlying valuation such as forecast
cash flows and discount rates are inherently subjective.
We obtained management’s calculations of the fair value of the
investment in the Italian SPV. We performed the following procedures:
Obtained the calculation for the fair value of the Italian SPV.
Tested the mathematical accuracy of the calculation and agreed
the inputs to the supporting documentation; and
In respect of the underlying investments in the Italian SPV, we
agreed the forecast cash flows to supporting documentation such
as signed contracts, tested the mathematical accuracy of the
valuation models and assessed the discount rates used.
Our testing did not identify any evidence of material misstatement.
How we tailored the audit scope
We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed
enough work to be able to give an opinion on the financial statements
as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group and the
Company, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry
in which they operate.
The Group consists of the Company and its two subsidiaries in the
UK and Italy, Attika Holdings Limited and one compartment of SPV
Project 2013 S.r.l. respectively. All three were determined to be
financially significant components for the purposes of the Group
audit. The Group operates common processes and controls in
accounting for its investments held at fair value through and profit
and loss and investments at amortised cost and investment income.
The related balances were therefore audited by the Group team in
the UK and the Group team was able to get sufficient coverage over
the components’ balances such that there was no need for the
involvement of component auditors. As part of designing our audit
of the Company, we determined materiality and assessed the risks
of material misstatement in the financial statements. In particular,
we looked at where the Directors made subjective judgements, for
example in respect of significant accounting estimates that
involvedmaking assumptions and considering future events that are
inherently uncertain.
The impact of climate risk on our audit
As part of our audit, we made enquiries of management to understand
the extent of the potential impact of climate risk on the Group’s and
Company’s financial statements, and we remained alert when performing
our audit procedures for any indicators of the impact of climate risk.
As part of our procedures over the valuation of investments held at
fair value through profit or loss, we obtained the third-party technical
advice used by management to forecast energy production. We have
reviewed the appropriateness of disclosures included in the financial
statements and have read the Annual Report to consider whether
other climate change disclosures are materially consistent with the
financial statements and our knowledge obtained in the audit. Based
on our procedures performed, no significant findings have been noted.
© 2024 AEET | 55
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF AQUILA ENERGY EFFICIENCY TRUST PLC
CONTINUED
Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative thresholds for materiality. These, together
with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures on
the individual financial statement line items and disclosures and in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both individually and in aggregate
on the financial statements as a whole.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:
Financial statements – Group Financial statements – Company
Overall materiality
£1,393,000 (2023: £1,886,000). £1,323,000 (2023: £1,791,000).
How we determined it
2% of net assets
2% of net assets capped at 95% of Group materiality
Rationale for benchmark applied
Net assets are deemed to be the appropriate
benchmark because the Group's performance is
measured on its net asset value.
Net assets are deemed to be the appropriate
benchmark because the Company's performance
is measured on its net asset value.
For each component in the scope of our Group audit, we allocated a materiality that is less than our overall Group materiality. The range of
materiality allocated across components was between £1,028,000 and £1,323,000. Certain components were audited to a local statutory
audit materiality that was also less than our overall Group materiality.
We use performance materiality to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected
misstatements exceeds overall materiality. Specifically, we use performance materiality in determining the scope of our audit and the nature
and extent of our testing of account balances, classes of transactions and disclosures, for example in determining sample sizes. Our performance
materiality was 75% (2023: 75%) of overall materiality, amounting to £1,045,000 (2023: £1,414,000) for the Group financial statements and
£992,000 (2023: £1,344,000) for the Company financial statements.
In determining the performance materiality, we considered a number of factors - the history of misstatements, risk assessment and aggregation
risk and the effectiveness of controls - and concluded that an amount at the upper end of our normal range was appropriate.
We agreed with the Audit and Risk Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above £69,665 (Group
audit) (2023: £94,281) and £66,182 (Company audit) (2023: £90,000) as well as misstatements below those amounts that, in our view,
warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.
Reporting on other information
The other information comprises all of the information in the Annual Report other than the financial statements and our auditors’ report thereon.
The Directors are responsible for the other information. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and,
accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this report, any form of assurance thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether
the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears
to be materially misstated. If we identify an apparent material inconsistency or material misstatement, we are required to perform procedures
to conclude whether there is a material misstatement of the financial statements or a material misstatement of the other information. If, based
on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that
fact. We have nothing to report based on these responsibilities.
With respect to the Strategic Report and Directors’ Report, we also considered whether the disclosures required by the UK Companies Act2006
have been included.
Based on our work undertaken in the course of the audit, the Companies Act 2006 requires us also to report certain opinions and matters as
described below.
56 | © 2024 AEET
Strategic Report and Directors’ Report
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the
audit, the information given in the Strategic Report and Directors’
Report, for the year ended 31 December 2024 is consistent with the
financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with
applicable legal requirements.
In light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and
Company and their environment obtained in the course of the audit,
we did not identify any material misstatements in the Strategic Report
and Directors’ Report.
Directors’ Remuneration
In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be
audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies
Act 2006.
Corporate governance statement
The Listing Rules require us to review the Directors’ statements in
relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the
corporate governance statement relating to the Company’s compliance
with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified
for our review. Our additional responsibilities with respect to the
corporate governance statement as other information are described
in the Reporting on other information section of this report.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded
that each of the following elements of the corporate governance
statement, included within the Strategic Report and Directors’ Report
is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge
obtained during the audit, and, except for the matters reported in
the section headed ‘Material uncertainty related to going concern’,
we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to:
The Directors’ confirmation that they have carried out a robust
assessment of the emerging and principal risks;
The disclosures in the Annual Report that describe those principal
risks, what procedures are in place to identify emerging risks and
an explanation of how these are being managed or mitigated;
The Directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether
they considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis
of accounting in preparing them, and their identification of any
material uncertainties to the Group’s and Company’s ability to
continue to do so over a period of at least twelve months from
the date of approval of the financial statements;
The Directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the Group’s
and Company’s prospects, the period this assessment covers and
why the period is appropriate; and
The Directors’ statement as to whether they have a reasonable
expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation
and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of its
assessment, including any related disclosures drawing attention
to any necessary qualifications or assumptions.
Our review of the Directors’ statement regarding the longer-term
viability of the Group and Company was substantially less in scope
than an audit and only consisted of making inquiries and considering
the Directors’ process supporting their statement; checking that the
statement is in alignment with the relevant provisions of the UK
Corporate Governance Code; and considering whether the statement
is consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge and
understanding of the Group and Company and their environment
obtained in the course of the audit.
In addition, based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we
have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate
governance statement is materially consistent with the financial
statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit:
The Directors’ statement that they consider the Annual Report,
taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable, and
provides the information necessary for the members to assess
the Group’s and Company’s position, performance, business
model and strategy;
The section of the Annual Report that describes the review of
effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems;
and
The section of the Annual Report describing the work of the
Audit and Risk Committee.
We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility to report
when the Directors’ statement relating to the Company’s compliance
with the Code does not properly disclose a departure from a relevant
provision of the Code specified under the Listing Rules for review by
the auditors.
© 2024 AEET | 57
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF AQUILA ENERGY EFFICIENCY TRUST PLC
CONTINUED
Responsibilities for the financial statements and the audit
Responsibilities of the Directors for the financial statements
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities
in respect of the financial statements, the Directors are responsible
for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with
the applicable framework and for being satisfied that they give a
true and fair view. The Directors are also responsible for such internal
control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of
financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible
for assessing the Group’s and the Company’s ability to continue as
a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going
concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the
Directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the Company or to
cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors’ report that
includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance,
but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with
ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material
if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected
to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of
these financial statements.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with
laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities,
outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of
irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are
capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below.
Based on our understanding of the Group and industry, we identified
that the principal risks of non-compliance with laws and regulations
related to the ongoing qualification as an Investment Trust under
Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010, and we considered the
extent to which non-compliance might have a material effect on the
financial statements. We also considered those laws and regulations
that have a direct impact on the financial statements such as the
Companies Act 2006. We evaluated management’s incentives and
opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the financial statements
(including the risk of override of controls), and determined that the
principal risks were related to posting inappropriate journal entries to
increase profit or to increase total Shareholders’ funds, and management
bias in accounting estimates, such as the valuation of investments held
at fair value through profit or loss or carrying value of of investments
held at amortised cost less expected credit losses. Audit procedures
performed by the engagement team included:
Enquires with the Board of Directors, Investment Adviser and the
Administrator, over consideration of known or suspected instances
of non-compliance with laws and regulations and fraud;
Challenging assumptions and judgements made by the Board of
Directors and the Investment Adviser in their significant accounting
estimates, in particular, in relation to the valuation of investments
held at fair value through profit or loss and carrying value of
investments held at amortised cost less expected credit losses (see
related key audit matters above);
Identifying and testing journal entries, based on risk criteria, made
throughout the year as well as those made as part of the year end
reporting process;
Reviewing relevant meeting minutes, including those of the Board
of Directors and Audit and Risk Committee;
Assessment of the Company’s compliance with the requirements
of Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010;
Reviewing the financial statements disclosures to underlying
supporting documentation; and
Designing audit procedures to incorporate unpredictability around
the nature, timing or extent of our testing.
There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures described above.
We are less likely to become aware of instances of non-compliance
with laws and regulations that are not closely related to events and
transactions reflected in the financial statements. Also, the risk of not
detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk
of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate
concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations,
or through collusion.
Our audit testing might include testing complete populations of certain
transactions and balances, possibly using data auditing techniques.
However, it typically involves selecting a limited number of items for
testing, rather than testing complete populations. We will often seek
58 | © 2024 AEET
to target particular items for testing based on their size or risk
characteristics. In other cases, we will use audit sampling to enable
us to draw a conclusion about the population from which the sample
is selected.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial
statements is located on the FRC’s website at:
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part
of our auditors’ report.
Use of this report
This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only
for the Company’s members as a body in accordance with Chapter3
of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and for no other purpose.
We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume responsibility
for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is
shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed
by our prior consent in writing.
Other required reporting
Companies Act 2006 exception reporting
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if,
in our opinion:
we have not obtained all the information and explanations we
require for our audit; or
adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Company,
or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from
branches not visited by us; or
certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law
are not made; or
the Company financial statements and the part of the Directors’
Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement with
the accounting records and returns.
We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility.
Appointment
Following the recommendation of the Audit and Risk Committee,
we were appointed by the Directors on 16 November 2021 to audit
the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2021 and
subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted
engagement is 4 years, covering the years ended 31 December 2021
to 31 December 2024.
Other matter
The Company is required by the Financial Conduct Authority Disclosure
Guidance and Transparency Rules to include these financial statements
in an annual financial report prepared under the structured digital
format required by DTR 4.1.15R – 4.1.18R and filed on the National
Storage Mechanism of the Financial Conduct Authority. This auditors’
report provides no assurance over whether the structured digital
format annual financial report has been prepared in accordance with
those requirements.
Richard McGuire (Senior Statutory Auditor)
for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors
London
28 April 2025
© 2024 AEET | 59
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024
For the year endedFor the year ended
31 December 2024 31 December 2023
Revenue CapitalTotalRevenue CapitalTotal
Notes
£'000£'000£'000£'000£'000
£'000
Losses on investments at fair value
through profit and loss
4
(2, 077)
(2, 077)
(2, 3 8 0)
(2, 3 8 0)
Unrealised (loss)/gain on derivatives
(24)
(24)
12 2
12 2
Realised gain on derivatives
3, 4 93
3 , 493
1, 713
1,7 13
Net foreign exchange loss
(3,2 41)
(3 , 241)
(6 4)
(6 4)
Investment Income
5
5,397
5, 397
5,9 4 8
5,9 4 8
Investment advisory fees
6
(6 47)
(6 47)
(808)
(808)
Impairment loss
4
(2,55 4)
(2, 55 4)
(1, 7 3 5)
(1, 7 3 5)
Other expenses
7
(2 , 3 74)
(2 , 3 74)
(2,492)
(2,492)
(Loss)/profit on ordinary activities before
taxation
(17 8)
(1, 849)
(2 ,027)
913
(60 9)
304
Taxation
8
(Loss)/profit on ordinary activities after
taxation
(17 8)
(1, 849)
(2 ,027)
913
(60 9)
304
(Loss)/return per Ordinary Share
9
(0. 20)p
(2.09)p
(2.2 9)p
0 . 91p
(0 . 61)p
0.30p
The total column of the Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Comprehensive Income is the profit and loss account of the Group.
All revenue and capital items in the above consolidated statement derive from continuing operations. No operations were discontinued during
the year.
Profit/(loss) on ordinary activities after taxation is also the “Total comprehensive income/(expense) for the year”.
The notes on pages 68 to 91 are an integral part of these financial statements.
60 | © 2024 AEET
COMPANY STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024
For the year ended
31 December 2024
For the year ended
31 December 2023
Revenue
£'000
Capital
£'000
Total
£'000
Revenue
£'000
Capital
£'000
Total
£'000Notes
(Losses)/gains on investments at fair value through
profit or loss
4 (1,299) (1,299) 961 961
Net foreign exchange loss (1,728) (1,728) (37) (37)
Investment income 5 4,203 4,203 4,080 4,080
Investment advisory fees 6 (647) (647) (808) (808)
Other expenses 7 (1,939) (1,939) (1,912) (1,912)
Impairment loss 4 (923) (923) (2,041) (2,041)
Profit/(loss) on ordinary activities before
taxation
694 (3,027) (2,333) (681) 924 243
Taxation 8
Profit/(loss) on ordinary activities after
taxation
694 (3,027) (2,333) (681) 924 243
Return/(loss) per Ordinary Share 9 0.79p (3.43)p (2.64)p (0.68)p 0.92p 0.24p
The total column of the Company Statement of Profit or Loss and Comprehensive Income is the profit and loss account of the Company.
All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. No operations were acquired or discontinued during
the year.
Profit/(loss) on ordinary activities after taxation is also the “Total comprehensive income/(expense) for the year”.
The notes on pages 68 to 91 are an integral part of these financial statements.
© 2024 AEET | 61
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2024
20242023
Notes
£‘000
£‘000
Fixed assets
Investments at fair value through profit or loss
4
10, 02 2
10, 4 9 2
Investments at amortised cost
4
46,30 9
54 ,99 0
56 , 3 31
65,4 82
Current assets
10
Trade and other receivables
80
652
Derivative financial instrument
12 2
Cash and cash equivalents
14 , 417
29,0 82
14 , 4 9 7
2 9,8 56
Creditors: amounts falling due within one year
11
Payables
(1 ,1 3 7)
(1, 0 57)
Derivative financial instrument
(24)
Net current assets
13 , 33 6
28,79 9
Net assets
69,6 67
9 4 , 281
Capital and reserves: equity
Share capital
12
814
1 ,000
Capital redemption reserve
13
18 6
Special reserve
13
7 0 , 913
93 ,5 0 0
Capital reserve
13
(2,0 27)
(17 8)
Revenue reserve
13
(219)
(4 1)
Shareholders‘ funds
6 9,6 67
94 , 2 81
Net asset value per Ordinary Share
14
8 5 .55p
9 4. 28p
No. of Ordinary Shares in issue
8 1, 4 3 8 , 2 6 8
1 00, 000 ,000
Approved by the Board of directors and authorised for issue on 28 April 2025.
Signed on behalf of the Board of Directors
Miriam Greenwood OBE DL
Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust PLC is incorporated in England and Wales with Company number 13324616.
The notes on pages 68 to 91 are an integral part of these financial statements.
62 | © 2024 AEET
COMPANY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2024
2024
£‘000
2023
£‘000Notes
Fixed assets
Investment in subsidiaries 4 38,399 45,654
Current assets 10
Trade and other receivables 27,34 8 27,548
Cash and cash equivalents 7,620 22,548
34,968 50,096
Creditors: amounts falling due within one year 11 (3, 411) (874)
Net current assets 31,557 49,222
Net assets 69,956 94,876
Capital and reserves: equity
Share capital 12 814 1,000
Capital redemption reserve 13 186
Special reserve 13 70,913 93,500
Capital reserve 13 (104) 2,923
Revenue reserve 13 (1,853) (2,547)
Shareholders' funds 69,956 94,876
Approved by the Board of directors and authorised for issue on 28April 2025.
Signed on behalf of the Board of Directors
Miriam Greenwood OBE DL
Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust PLC is incorporated in England and Wales with Company number 13324616.
The notes on pages 68 to 91 are an integral part of these financial statements.
© 2024 AEET | 63
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024
Capital
Share redemption Special Capital Revenue
capitalreservereservereservereserveTotal
For the year ended 31 December 2024
Notes
£‘000£’000£‘000£‘000£‘000
£‘000
Opening equity as at 1 January 2024
1 ,000
93, 50 0
(17 8)
(41)
94 , 281
Repurchase and cancellation of the Company’s own
shares following a Tender Offer
12
(18 6)
18 6
(17, 5 00)
(17, 5 00)
Expenses of Tender Offer
(88)
(88)
Dividend paid
15
(4, 999)
(4,999)
Loss for the year
(1, 849)
(17 8)
(2 ,0 27)
Closing equity as at 31 December 2024
814
18 6
7 0 , 913
(2,027)
(219)
69,6 67
Capital
Share redemption Special Capital Revenue
capitalreservereservereservereserveTotal
For the year ended 31 December 2023
Notes
£‘000£’000£‘000£‘000£‘000
£‘000
Opening equity as at 1 January 2023
1 ,000
9 4 ,75 0
431
(9 5 4)
9 5, 2 27
Dividend paid
15
(1, 25 0)
(1, 2 5 0)
(Loss)/profit for the year
(609)
913
30 4
Closing equity as at 31 December 2023
1 ,000
93, 50 0
(17 8)
(41)
94 , 281
The notes on pages 68 to 91 are an integral part of these financial statements.
64 | © 2024 AEET
COMPANY STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024
For the year ended 31 December 2024
Share
capital
£‘000
Capital
redemption
reserve
£’000
Special
reserve
£‘000
Capital
reserve
£‘000
Revenue
reserve
£‘000
Total
£‘000Notes
Opening equity as at 1 January 2024 1,000 93,500 2,923 (2,547) 94,876
Repurchase and cancellation of the Company’s own
shares following a Tender Offer 12 (186) 186 (17,500) (17,500)
Expenses of Tender Offer (88) (88)
Dividend paid 15 (4,999) (4,999)
(Loss)/profit for the year (3,027) 694 (2,333)
Closing equity as at 31 December 2024 814 186 70,913 (104) (1,853) 69,956
For the year ended 31 December 2023
Share
capital
£‘000
Capital
redemption
reserve
£’000
Special
reserve
£‘000
Capital
reserve
£‘000
Revenue
reserve
£‘000
Total
£‘000Notes
Opening equity as at 1 January 2023 1,000 94,750 1,999 (1,866) 95,883
Dividend paid 15 (1,250) (1,250)
Profit/(loss) for the year 924 (681) 243
Closing equity as at 31 December 2023 1,000 93,500 2,923 (2,547) 94,876
The notes on pages 68 to 91 are an integral part of these financial statements.
© 2024 AEET | 65
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024
For the year For the year
ended ended
31December 31December
20242023
Notes
£‘000
£’000
Operating activities
(Loss)/profit on ordinary activities before taxation
(2,0 27)
304
Adjustments for:
Unrealised loss on investments
4
2,0 60
2, 3 8 0
Unrealised loss/(gain) on derivative instruments
24
(12 2)
Realised loss on investments
4
17
Realised gains on derivative investments
(10 8)
Impairment loss
2,55 4
1, 7 3 5
Net foreign exchange loss
3, 241
11 6
Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables
572
(3 10)
Increase in creditors: amounts falling due within one year
80
968
Interest receivable from amortised cost investments
4
(4 , 008)
(2,4 20)
Net cash flow from operating activities
2 , 513
2 ,543
Investing activities
Purchase of investments
4
(4, 224)
(2 1, 8 3 4)
Repayment of investments
4
9, 89 4
3,0 50
Net cash flow used in investing activities
5, 670
(18 ,78 4)
Financing activities
Tender Offer payment
(17, 5 00)
Expenses of Tender Offer
(88)
Dividends paid
15
(4, 999)
(1, 25 0)
Net cash flow used in financing activities
(22 ,5 87)
(1, 2 5 0)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(1 4,404)
(17, 4 9 1)
Cash and cash equivalents at start of year
29,0 82
46 ,6 25
Effect of foreign currency exchange translation
(261)
(52)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
14 , 4 17
29, 0 82
The notes on pages 68 to 91 are an integral part of these financial statements.
66 | © 2024 AEET
COMPANY STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024
For the year
ended
31December
2024
£‘000
For the year
ended
31December
2023
£’000Notes
Operating activities
(Loss)/profit on ordinary activities before taxation (2,333) 243
Adjustments for:
Unrealised loss/(gain) on investments 4 1,299 (961)
Net foreign exchange loss/(gain) 1,728 (17)
Shareholder loan interest income (1,936) (1,912)
Adjustment for impairment loss 923 2,041
Movement in intercompany balances 2,443 (1,901)
Decrease/(increase) in trade receivables 199 (91)
Increase/(decrease) in creditors: amounts falling due within one year 94 (175)
Net cash flow generated from/(used in) operating activities* 2,417 (2,773)
Investing activities
Purchase of investments 4 (294) (4,808)
Repayment of investments 4 3,724 1,306
Net cash flow used in investing activities 3,430 (3,502)
Financing activities
Loan to subsidiary 1 (4,437)
Shareholder loan interest income received 1,936 1,782
Tender Offer payment (17,500)
Expenses of Tender Offer (88)
Dividends paid 15 (4,999) (1,250)
Net cash flow used in financing activities (20,650) (3,905)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents (14,803) (10,180)
Cash and cash equivalents at start of year 22,548 32,714
Effect of foreign currency exchange translation (125) 14
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 7,620 22,548
*Cash flows from operating activities were presented after the following non-cash
transactions:
Conversion of intercompany receivables to investment in subsidiary 11,791
Conversion of intercompany receivable to Shareholder loan 23,076
34,867
The notes on pages 68 to 91 are an integral part of these financial statements.
© 2024 AEET | 67
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
68 | © 2024 AEET
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust Plc (the “Company”) is a public Company
limited by shares , incorporated in England and Wales on 9 April 2021
with registered number 13324616. The Company is domiciled in
England and Wales. The Company is a closed-ended investment
company with an indefinite life. The Company commenced its
operations on 2 June 2021 when the Company’s Ordinary Shares
were admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange. The Directors
intend to continue conducting the affairs of the Company so as to
retain its status as an investment trust for the purposes of section
1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010, as amended.
The Company owns 100% of its subsidiary, Attika Holdings Limited
(the “HoldCo” or ‘‘AHL’’) and 100% of the notes issued by one
compartment of SPV Project 2013 S.r.l. (the ‘‘SPV’’ or ‘‘Italian SPV’’)
issued to the Company, which entitles the Company to a 100%
economic interest in the receivables purchased through the proceeds
of these notes, together the ‘‘Group’’.
The registered office address of the Company is 4th Floor, 140 Aldersgate
Street, London, EC1A 4HY .
The Company’s investment objective is to generate attractive returns,
principally in the form of income distributions, by investing in a
diversified portfolio of Energy Efficiency Investments.
FundRock Management Company (Guernsey) Limited (formerly Sanne
Fund Management (Guernsey) Limited) acts as the Company’s
Alternative Investment Fund Manager (the “AIFM”) for the purposes
of Directive 2011/61/EU on alternative investment fund managers
(“A IFM D).
The Group’s Investment Adviser is Aquila Capital Investmentgesellschaft
mbH authorised and regulated by the German Federal Financial
Supervisory Authority.
Apex Listed Companies Services (UK) Limited (the “Administrator”)
(formerly Sanne Fund Services (UK) Limited) provides administrative
and company secretarial services to the Group under the terms of
an administration agreement between the Company and the
Administrator. The Italian SPV is administered by Zenith Service S.p.A.
2. BASIS OF PREPARATION
Group financial statements
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with UK adopted international accounting standards in conformity
with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 as applicable to
companies reporting under those standards.
The consolidated financial statements have also been prepared as
far as is relevant and applicable to the Group in accordance with the
Statement of Recommended Practice (“SORP”) issued by the Association
of Investment Companies (“AIC”) in July 2022.
The consolidated financial statements are prepared on the historical
cost basis, except for the revaluation of certain financial instruments
at fair value through profit or loss. The principal accounting policies
adopted are set out below. These policies are consistently applied.
The financial statements are presented in sterling rounded to the
nearest thousand. They have been prepared in accordance with the
accounting policies, significant judgements, key assumptions and
estimates set out below.
Company financial statements
The Company financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with the UK adopted international accounting standards in conformity
with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 as applicable to
companies reporting under those standards.
The financial statements have also been prepared as far as is relevant
and applicable to the Company in accordance with the Statement
of Recommended Practice (“SORP”) issued by the AIC in July 2022.
The financial statements are prepared on the historical cost basis,
except for the revaluation of certain financial instruments at fair value
through profit or loss. The principal accounting policies adopted are
set out below. These policies are consistently applied.
The functional currency of the Company is sterling. The capital of
the Company was raised in sterling and majority of its expenses are
in sterling. The liquidity of the Company is managed in sterling as
the Company’s performance is evaluated in that currency. Accordingly,
the financial statements are presented in sterling rounded to the
nearest thousand. They have been prepared in accordance with the
accounting policies, significant judgements, key assumptions and
estimates as set out below.
Basis of consolidation
The Company does not satisfy the definition of an investment entity
in paragraph 27(c) if IFRS 10, as it does not measure and evaluate
the performance of substantially all of its investment on a fair value
basis. It is therefore required to prepare consolidated accounts.
The Group’s financial statements consolidate those of the Company
and of its subsidiaries at 31 December 2024. The subsidiaries have
a reporting date of 31 December. AHL’s functional currency is
sterling. The Italian SPV’s functional currency is the euro. However,
to align with the Group’s functional currency, the balances of
Italian SPV have been converted to sterling at the year-end rate
for the Statement of Financial Position accounts and at the average
rate during the year for the Statement of Profit or Loss and
Comprehensive Income accounts.
All transactions and balances between Group companies are
eliminated on consolidation. The accounting policies adopted by
the Group are consistent with those adopted by the Company
and the subsidiaries.
Accounting for wholly owned entities
AHL
The Company owns 100% of its subsidiary, AHL. The registered
office address of AHL is Leaf B, 20th Floor, Tower 42, Old Broad
Street, London, England, EC2N 1HQ. The Company has acquired
Energy Efficiency Investments through its investment in the subsidiary.
The Company will finance the subsidiary through a mix of equity and
debt instruments. The Company consolidates the subsidiary.
© 2024 AEET | 69
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
Italian SPV
The Italian SPV is a Company established under the laws of Italy to
hold securitised receivables. The Company does not hold any equity
in the SPV. However, it does own 100% of the notes issued by one
compartment of the SPV which entitles the Company to an 100%
economic interest in the receivables purchased through the proceeds
of these notes. The Company does not have an economic interest
in any of the other securities receivables issuances by the Italian SPV.
The notes subscribed by the Company, issued by the Italian SPV, and
the receivables purchased from the proceeds of these notes, together
with all associated assets and liabilities and income and costs, are
ring-fenced from other assets and liabilities of the Italian SPV and
thus the Company’s holdings have been deemed a silo under IFRS
10 paragraph B77. The Company consolidates the results of the
Italian SPV in respect of the performance of the receivables in the silo.
Going concern
The Directors have adopted the going concern basis in preparing the
financial statements. The following is a summary of the Directors’
assessment of the going concern status of the Group and Company.
The Group and Company continue to meet day-to-day liquidity needs
through their cash resources. The Directors have a reasonable
expectation that the Group and Company have adequate resources
to continue in operational existence for at least twelve months from
the date of this document.
In reaching this conclusion, the Directors have taken into account the
following considerations:
The Group’s investment commitments, amounting to £0.04 million,
and its income and expense flows;
No new commitments have been entered into since 28 February 2023;
The £36.4 million cash balance at 31 March 2025 (excluding £2.5
million held as collateral for FX hedging) following the receipt of
repayments up to that date; and
The potential income from the remaining investments.
The Board has announced that a special interim dividend of 36.837
pence per Ordinary Share will be paid on 30 May 2025. Total expenses
for the year were £3.0 million (excluding impairment losses)
(2023: £3.3 million), which represented 3.8% of average net assets
during the year (2023: 3.5%). The Board, Investment Adviser and AIFM
will review the ongoing liquidity requirements and cashflow forecasts
of the Company prior to making further distributions to ensure that
sufficient funds are maintained throughout the run-off process. At
the date of approval of this document, based on the aggregate of
investments and cash held, the Group and Company have substantial
operating expenses cover. The Directors are also satisfied that the
Group and Company would continue to remain viable under downside
scenarios.
At the Annual General Meeting of the Company (the “AGM”)
held on 14 June 2023, Shareholders voted in favour of the
Company’s change of investment policy (the “New Investment
Policy”). Following the AGM, and in accordance with the New
Investment Policy, the Company entered a continuation and
managed run-off of its portfolio (“Managed Run-Off”), meaning
that it is not making any new investments (save for the limited
circumstances as set out in the New Investment Policy) and its
investing activity is solely in respect of funding legal commitments
to existing investments.
The Continuation and Managed Run-Off Resolution was put forward
as a resolution to Shareholders in response to the outcome of the
Company’s continuation vote held in February 2023, which did not pass.
As referred to above, the Company is operating currently under a
Managed Run-Off with the term of some of the Company’s assets
being of several years. While the Company is continuing to explore
other strategic options, there remains no certainty that any of these
options will materialise and be put to Shareholders for consideration.
Accordingly, while the Directors recognise that these conditions
indicate the existence of material uncertainty which may cast significant
doubt about the Group and Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern, based on the assessment and considerations above, the
Directors have concluded that the financial statements of the Group
and the Company should be prepared on a going concern basis.
Neither the Group nor the Company financial statements include
any potential costs of liquidation and the financial statements do
not include the other adjustments that would result if the Group
and the Company were unable to continue as a going concern.
Critical accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires
the application of estimates and assumptions which may affect the
results reported in the consolidated financial statements. Estimates,
by their nature, are based on judgement and available information.
The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing
a material adjustment to the carrying value of assets and liabilities
are those used to determine the fair value of the investments and
expected credit loss as disclosed in note 4 to the financial statements.
Investment fair value
The key assumptions that have a significant impact on the value of
the Group’s investments are discount rates, energy yield, power
prices and capital expenditure factors. The impact of risks associated
with climate change is assessed on an investment-by-investment
basis and factored into the underlying cash flows where relevant.
The discount factors are subjective and therefore it is feasible that a
reasonable alternative assumption may be used resulting in a different
value. The discount factors applied to the cashflows are reviewed
semi-annually by the Investment Adviser to ensure they are at the
appropriate level. The Investment Adviser will take into consideration
market transactions, where they are of similar nature, when considering
changes to the discount factors used.
70 | © 2024 AEET
2. BASIS OF PREPARATION CONTINUED
The operating costs of the operating companies are frequently partly
or wholly subject to indexation and an assumption is made that
inflation will increase at a long-term rate.
The values of Energy Efficiency investments are not significantly
sensitive to fluctuations in future revenues if a fixed indexation clause
is applied to its cash flow schedule.
Expected credit loss (‘‘ECL’’) allowance for financial assets
measured at amortised cost
The calculation of the Group’s ECL allowances and provisions against
receivable purchase agreements under IFRS 9 is complex and involves
the use of significant judgement and estimation. Loan impairment
provisions represent an estimate of the losses incurred in the loan
portfolios at the balance sheet date. The calculation involves the
formulation and incorporation of multiple conditions into ECL to
meet the measurement objective of IFRS 9. Further details are given
in note 4 to the financial statement below.
New Standards, Interpretations and Amendments Adopted
from 1 January 2024
A number of new standards and amendments to standards are
effective for the annual periods beginning after 1 January 2024.
None of these have a significant effect on the measurement of the
amounts recognised in the financial statements of the Company .
New Standards and Amendments Issued but not yet Effective
The relevant new and amended standards and interpretations that
are issued, but not yet effective, up to the date of issuance of the
Group’s and Company’s financial statements are disclosed below.
Amendments to IAS 21 – Lack of Exchangeability (effective
for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2025)
In August 2023, the IASB amended IAS 21 to help entities to determine
whether a currency is exchangeable into another currency, and which
spot exchange rate to use when it is not. The Group does not expect
these amendments to have a material impact on its operations or
financial statements.
Amendments to the Classification and Measurement of Financial
Instruments – Amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 (effective for
annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2026)
On 30 May 2024, the IASB issued targeted amendments to IFRS 9
and IFRS 7 to respond to recent questions arising in practice, and to
include new requirements not only for financial institutions but also
for corporate entities. These amendments:
clarify the date of recognition and derecognition of some financial
assets and liabilities, with a new exception for some financial
liabilities settled through an electronic cash transfer system;
clarify and add further guidance for assessing whether a financial
asset meets the solely payments of principal and interest (SPPI)
criterion;
add new disclosures for certain instruments with contractual
terms that can change cash flows (such as some financial
instruments with features linked to the achievement of environment,
social and governance targets); and
update the disclosures for equity instruments designated at fair
value through other comprehensive income (‘FVOCI’).
The Group does not expect these amendments to have a material
impact on its operations or financial statements.
IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements (effective
for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027)
IFRS 18 will replace IAS 1 Presentation of financial statements, introducing
new requirements that will help to achieve comparability of the financial
performance of similar entities and provide more relevant information and
transparency to users. Even though IFRS 18 will not impact the recognition
or measurement of items in the financial statements, its impacts on
presentation and disclosure are expected to be pervasive, in particular those
related to the statement of comprehensive income and providing management-
defined performance measures within the financial statements.
Management is currently assessing the detailed implications of applying
the new standard on the Groups and Company’s financial statements.
From the high-level preliminary assessment performed, the following
potential impacts have been identified:
Although the adoption of IFRS 18 will have no impact on the
Groups and Companys net profit, the Group and Company
expects that grouping items of income and expenses in the
statement of comprehensive income into the new categories will
impact how operating profit is calculated and reported. From the
high-level impact assessment that the Group and Company has
performed, the following might potentially impact operating profit:
Foreign exchange differences currently aggregated in the line
item ‘Net foreign exchange loss/gain’ in operating profit might
need to be disaggregated, with some foreign exchange gains
or losses presented below operating profit.
The line items presented on the primary financial statements
might change as a result of the application of the concept of
‘useful structured summary’ and the enhanced principles on
aggregation and disaggregation.
The Company does not expect there to be a significant change in
the information that is currently disclosed in the notes because
the requirement to disclose material information remains unchanged;
however, the way in which the information is grouped might
change as a result of the aggregation/disaggregation principles.
In addition, there will be significant new disclosures required for:
management-defined performance measures;
a break-down of the nature of expenses for line items presented
by function in the operating category of the statement of
comprehensive income – this break-down is only required for
certain nature expenses; and
for the first annual period of application of IFRS 18, a reconciliation
for each line item in the statement of comprehensive income
between the restated amounts presented by applying IFRS 18
and the amounts previously presented applying IAS 1.
From a cash flow statement perspective, there will be changes to
how interest received and interest paid are presented. Interest
paid will be presented as financing cash flows and interest received
as investing cash flows, which is a change from current presentation
as part of operating cash flows.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED
© 2024 AEET | 71
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
The Group and Company will apply the new standard from its mandatory
effective date of 1 January 2027. Retrospective application is required,
and so the comparative information for the financial year ending 31
December 2026 will be restated in accordance with IFRS 18.
3. MATERIAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Financial instruments
Financial assets
The Group’s and Company’s financial assets principally comprise
cash and cash equivalents, investments held at fair value through
profit and loss, investments held at amortised cost, derivative financial
instruments, interest income receivables, Shareholder loan receivables
and prepayments and other receivables.
Interest income receivables, prepayments and other receivables are
initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at
amortised cost using the effective interest method.
The Group’s investments are debt instruments held at fair value
through profit or loss and debt instruments at amortised cost. Gains
or losses resulting from the movements in the fair value are recognised
in the Group’s Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and
Comprehensive income under the capital column. Debt instruments
at amortised cost are revalued with the functional currency exchange
rate at each valuation point and recognised in the Group’s Consolidated
Statement of Profit or Loss and Comprehensive income and are
subject to ECL.
Derivatives comprise forward currency transactions used to hedge the
Group’s foreign currency exposure. The fair value of the currency forward
transactions is the difference between the spot rate and the forward
rate at the date of the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
Investment in Subsidiaries
The Company’s investment in its subsidiary AHL comprises equity
shares and a Shareholder loan. The Company’s equity investment in
its subsidiary AHL, is held at cost less impairment in the Company’s
Statement of Financial Position.
The Company’s investment in SPV is held at fair value through profit
or loss. The fair value of SPV as at 31 December 2024 has been
determined through an aggregation of the fair value of SPV’s individual
investments adjusted for the cash and liabilities of SPV as at
31 December 2024. Where returns are not fixed, the fair value of SPV’s
individual investments take account of forecast power production and
power price curves provided by independent research companies.
Discount rates take account of the risk profile of the counterparty and
other areas of judgment.
Financial liabilities
The Group’s financial liabilities include trade and other payables and
other short-term monetary liabilities which are initially recognised
at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the
effective interest method. The Group’s financial liabilities also include
derivative financial instruments.
Recognition and derecognition
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised in the Group’s
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position when the Group becomes
a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Financial
assets and financial liabilities are initially measured at fair value.
At initial recognition, financial instruments classified at fair value
through profit or loss are measured at fair value which is normally
the transaction price. Other financial instruments not classified at
fair value through profit or loss are measured initially at fair value
but are adjusted for incremental and directly attributable transaction costs.
Transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition or
issue of financial assets and financial liabilities (other than financial
assets and financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss) are
added to or deducted from the value of the financial assets or financial
liabilities, as appropriate, on initial recognition. Transaction costs
directly attributable to the acquisition of financial assets or financial
liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are recognised immediately
in profit or loss.
A financial liability (in whole or in part) is derecognised when the
Group has extinguished its contractual obligations, it expires or is
cancelled. Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive
cash flows from the investments have expired or the Group has
transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.
Classification and measurement of financial assets
IFRS 9 contains a classification and measurement approach for debt
instruments that reflects the business model in which assets are
managed and their cash flow characteristics. For debt instruments
two criteria are used to determine how financial assets should be
classified and measured:
The entity’s business model (i.e. how an entity manages its debt
Instruments in order to generate cash flows by collecting
contractual cash flows, selling financial assets or both); and
The contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial asset
(i.e. whether the contractual cash flows are solely payments of
principal and interest).
A debt instrument is measured at amortised cost if it meets both of
the following conditions and is not designated as at fair value through
profit and loss (“FVTPL”):
(a) it is held within a business model whose objective is to hold
assets to collect contractual cash flows; and
(b) its contractual terms give rise on specified dates to cash flows
that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal
amount outstanding.
72 | © 2024 AEET
3. MATERIAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES CONTINUED
A debt instrument is measured at fair value through other comprehensive
income (“FVOCI”) if it meets both of the following conditions and
is not designated as at FVTPL:
(a) it is held within a business model whose objective is achieved
by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial
assets; and
(b) its contractual terms give rise on specified dates to cash flows
that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal
amount outstanding.
In assessing whether the contractual cash flows are solely payments
of principal and interest, the contractual terms of the instrument are
considered. This includes assessing whether the financial asset contains
a contractual term that could change the timing or amount of
contractual cash flows such that it would not meet this condition.
Subsequent to initial recognition, financial assets that are classified
as measured at fair value through profit or loss are measured at fair
value in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position (with no
deduction for sale or disposal costs). Gains and losses resulting from
the movement in fair value are recognised in the Consolidated
Statement of Profit or Loss and Comprehensive Income.
Subsequent to initial recognition, financial assets that are measured
at amortised cost require the use of the effective interest method
and are subject to expected credit loss.
Taxation
The tax charge for the year is based on amounts expected to be
received or paid.
Deferred tax is provided on all timing differences that have originated
but not reversed by the accounting date.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable timing differences
but deferred tax assets are only recognised to the extent that it is
probable that taxable profits will be available against which those
timing differences can be utilised.
Deferred tax is measured at the tax rate which is expected to apply
in the periods in which the timing differences are expected to reverse,
based on tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted
at the balance sheet date and is measured on an undiscounted basis.
Segmental reporting
The Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM”), which is the Board, is
of the opinion that the Group is engaged in a single segment of business,
being investment in energy efficiency assets to generate investment
returns whilst preserving capital. The financial information used by the
CODM to manage the Group presents the business as a single segment.
Income
Income includes interest and dividends receiveable from investments
held at fair value and at amortised cost, and bank interest.
Investment interest income for the year is recognised in the Consolidated
Statement of Profit or Loss and Comprehensive income using effective
interest method calculation.
Interest and dividends receivable are recognised when the right to
receive them is established and is reflected in the Consolidated
Statement of Profit or Loss and Comprehensive Income as Investment
Income.
Bank interest income is recognised for the year in the Consolidated
Statement of Profit or Loss and Comprehensive income on an accruals basis.
Expenses
All expenses are accounted for on an accruals basis. In respect of
the analysis between revenue and capital items presented within the
Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Comprehensive Income,
all expenses are presented as revenue as it is directly attributable to
the operations of the Group.
Details of the Group’s fee payments to the Investment Adviser are
disclosed in note 6 to the consolidated financial statements. Details of
the Group’s other expenses are disclosed in note 7 to the consolidated
financial statements. These fees are presented under the revenue column
in the Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Comprehensive Income.
Foreign currency
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated into
sterling at actual exchange rates as at the date of the transaction.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at
year-end are reported at the rates of exchange prevailing at the year-
end. Any gain or loss arising from a change in exchange rates subsequent
to the date of the transaction is included as an exchange gain or loss
to capital or revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss
and Comprehensive Income as appropriate. Foreign exchange movements
on investments are included in the Capital account of the Consolidated
Statement of Profit or Loss and Comprehensive Income.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include deposits held at call with banks
and other short-term deposits with original maturities of three months
or less.
Trade and other payables
Trade and other payables are initially recognised at fair value, and
subsequently re-measured at amortised cost using the effective
interest method where necessary.
Share capital and share premium
Ordinary Shares are classified as equity. Costs directly attributable
to the issue of new shares (that would have been avoided if there
had not been a new issue of new shares) are recognised against the
value of the ordinary share premium account.
Repurchase of the Company’s own shares are recognised and deducted
directly in equity. No gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss on
the purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of the Company’s own equity
instruments.
Realised gains and losses on investments
Realised gains and losses comprise the difference between the sale
proceeds of an investment and its fair value, and are deemed to be
realised when the proceeds have settled.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED
© 2024 AEET | 73
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
ECL allowance for financial assets measured at amortised cost
Many of the Group’s investments are financial assets measured at amortised cost. These investments are structured as purchases of receivables
or purchases of notes which have the right to receivables. The purchased receivables derive from energy services agreements for the provision
of energy efficiency and/or renewable energy solutions provided by Energy Service Companies (ESCOs”) to their corporate clients and these
receivables provide a fixed return for the Group. ESCOs are businesses that provide energy-related services to end-users, often focusing on energy
efficiency projects. The receivables are due to be received over a range of maturities from less than 12 months to more than fifteen years. Individual
agreements provide for the receivables to be paid mostly on a monthly or quarterly basis.
In addition to past events and current conditions, reasonable and supportable forecasts affecting collectability are also considered when
determining the amount of impairment in accordance with IFRS 9. Under the IFRS 9 expected credit loss model, expected credit losses are
recognised at each reporting period, even if no actual loss events have taken place. In addition to past events and current conditions, reasonable
and supportable forward-looking information that is available without undue cost or effort is considered in determining impairment, with the
model applied to all financial instruments subject to impairment testing.
At initial recognition, allowance is made for ECL resulting from default events that are possible within the next 12 months (12-month expected
ECL). In the event of a significant increase in credit risk, allowance (or provision) is made for ECL resulting from all possible default events over
the expected life of the financial instrument (lifetime ECL).
Financial assets where 12-month ECL is recognised are Stage 1; financial assets which are considered to have experienced a significant increase
in credit risk are in Stage 2; and financial assets which have defaulted or are otherwise considered to be credit-impaired are allocated to Stage
3. Stage 2 and Stage 3 are based on lifetime ECL.
The measurement of ECL, is primarily based on the product of the instrument’s probability of default (“PD”), loss given default (“LGD”), and
exposure at default (“EAD”), taking into account the value of any collateral held or other mitigants of loss and including the impact of
discounting using the EIR.
The PD represents the likelihood of a borrower defaulting on its financial obligation, either over the next 12 months (“12M PD”), or over
the remaining lifetime (“Lifetime PD”) of the obligation. This has been calculated by an external third party credit rating agency using a
wide range of parameters such as the company’s financial statements and the macro economic environment. The external credit rating
company have also designed a downside and upside scenario based on historic data. Company financials are modified to reflect various
factors leading to a deterioration in performance.
In each of the scenarios, various macro and financial variables are flexed and applied in the calculation. The macros variables are GDP
growth, inflation, unemployment rate and interest rate. The financial variables are turnover, net debt, Shareholder equity, working capital,
tangible assets, interest expense, EBITDA, EBIT and net income. A base, optimistic and pessimistic scenario is applied for each of these
above variables to calculate the corresponding expected credit loss.
The probability weighting of the scenarios was based an analysis of the level of severity. It was determined that a weighting of 50% for the
base case and 25% for each of the other scenarios was appropriate. The resulting forecasts are thus neither overly optimistic nor unduly
conservative for IFRS9 purposes.
Optimistic
Base Case
Mild Pessimistic
IFRS 9 Probability Weighting
25%
50%
25%
The EAD represents the amounts the Group is owed at the reporting date.
LGD represents the Group’s expectation of the extent of loss on a defaulted exposure. LGD varies by type of counterparty, type and seniority of
claim and availability of collateral or other credit support. LGD is expressed as a percentage loss per unit of EAD. LGD is calculated on a 12-month
or lifetime basis, where 12-month LGD is the percentage of loss expected to be made if the default occurs in the next 12 months and lifetime
LGD is the percentage of loss expected to be made if the default occurs over the remaining expected lifetime of the loan (“Lifetime LGD”).
The ECL is determined by estimating the PD, LGD, and EAD for each individual exposure or collective segment. These three components are
multiplied together and adjusted for the likelihood of survival (i.e., the exposure has not prepaid or defaulted in an earlier month). This effectively
calculates an ECL.
Management is aware that there is a high level of judgement in calculating the scenarios and the inputs given the assets are relatively recent
with limited historic data.
The main difference between Stage 1 and Stage 2 is the respective PD horizon. Stage 1 estimates use a maximum of a 12-month PD, while
Stage 2 estimates use a lifetime PD. The main difference between Stage 2 and Stage 3 is that Stage 3 is effectively the point at which there
has been a default event or the investment can be considered to be credit-impaired.
74 | © 2024 AEET
3. MATERIAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES CONTINUED
Movements between Stage 1 and Stage 2 are based on whether an instrument’s credit risk as at the reporting date has increased significantly
relative to the date it was initially recognised. Where the credit risk subsequently improves such that it no longer represents a significant
increase in credit risk since origination, the asset is transferred back to Stage 1.
In assessing whether a counterparty has had a significant increase in credit risk the following indicators are considered:
1. Early signs of cashflow/liquidity problems such as an ongoing delay in servicing of payables.
2. Significant increase in PD.
3. Actual or expected late payments or restructuring of payments due.
4. Actual or expected significant adverse change in operating results of the borrower, where this information is available.
5. Significant adverse changes in business, financial and/or economic conditions in which the counterparty operates.
Movements between Stage 2 and Stage 3 are based on whether financial assets are credit-impaired as at the reporting date. The Group uses
a rebuttable presumption that a credit deterioration (i.e. stage 1 to stage 2) occurs no later than when a payment is 90 days past due. The
Group uses this 90-day backstop for all its assets. Assets can move in both directions through the stages of the impairment model. The
Directors do not believe that being 30 days overdue is considered a credit deterioration given the nature and payment profile of some of its
small counterparties. Payments are different from consumer loan payments and often comprise a very large number of payments, each of a
very small amount. There is also significant evidence of catch-up payments, where a counterparty has just past the 30 days, and very rarely
have these counterparties missed the payment completely.
We recognise that individual credit exposures, which define the Group’s investments, are different from, for example, consumer mortgage or
consumer car loan portfolios. Late payments can arise due to the corporate counterparties refusing to utilise direct debit or standing order
payment processes with the result that payment chasing can be required for relatively small amounts, eg lighting service contracts. Accordingly,
we do expect that in certain cases 90 days late payments may not lead to movements through the ECL stages.
4. INVESTMENTS
Fair value measurements
IFRS 13 requires disclosure of fair value measurement by level. The level of fair value hierarchy within the financial assets or financial liabilities
is determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their entirety into only one of the following three levels:
Level 1
The unadjusted quoted price in an active market for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date.
Level 2
Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable (i.e. developed using market data) for the asset or liability, either
directly or indirectly.
Level 3
Inputs are unobservable (i.e. for which market data is unavailable) for the asset or liability.
The classification of the Group’s investments held at fair value are detailed in the table below:
31 December 2024
31 December 2023
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Group £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Investments at fair value through profit and
loss
10,022
10,022
10,492
10,492
Derivative financial instruments
(24)
(24)
122
122
(24)
10,022
9,998
122
10,492
10,614
There are no transfers between investment levels for the Group during the year.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED
© 2024 AEET | 75
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
The classification of the Company’s investments held is detailed in the table below:
31 December 2024
31 December 2023
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Company £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Investment in SPV at fair value through profit
or loss
29,351
29,351
35,683
35,683
There are no transfers between investment levels for the Company during the year.
The movement on the Level 3 unquoted investments of the Group during the year is shown below:
31 December 31 December
2024 2023
Group Group
£‘000 £‘000
Opening balance
10,492
11,742
Additions during the year
3,683
1,675
Disposals during the year
(1,564)
(1,551)
Realised losses
(17)
Urealised losses
(2,060)
(1,374)
Net FX losses
(512)
Closing balance
10,022
10,492
The movement on investments at amortised cost of the Group during the year is shown below:
31 December
2024
Group
£‘000
Opening balance
54,990
Additions during the year
541
Receipts during the year
(8,330)
Income accrued in the year
4,008
Net FX losses
(2,346)
Impairment
(2,554)
Closing balance
46,309
76 | © 2024 AEET
4. INVESTMENTS CONTINUED
The movement on the Level 3 unquoted investments of the Company during the year is shown below:
31 December 31 December
2024 2023
Company Company
£‘000 £‘000
Opening balance
35,683
31,220
Additions during the year
294
4,808
Repayments during the year
(3,724)
(1,306)
Net FX losses
(1,603)
Unrealised (losses)/gains
(1,299)
961
Closing balance
29,351
35,683
Assets and liabilities not carried at fair value but for which are fair value is disclosed
The following table presents the fair value of the Group’s assets and liabilities not measured at fair value through profit and loss at
31 December 2024 but for which fair value is disclosed:
31 December 2024
31 December 2023
Fair market Fair market
Carrying value value Carrying value value
£‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Assets
Investments at amortised cost
46,309
46,543
54,990
57,221
For all other assets and liabilities not carried at fair value, the carrying value is a reasonable approximation of fair value.
Valuation methodology
Debt instruments at fair value through profit or loss
The Group through its subsidiary (AHL) and its notes in the Italian SPV has acquired debt instruments at fair value through profit or loss. The
Investment Adviser has determined the fair value of debt investments as at 31 December 2024. The Directors have satisfied themselves as to
the fair value of the debt instrument investments as at 31 December 2024.
Valuation Assumptions and Inputs
The determination of what qualifies as ‘observable’ data requires significant judgment. Observable data is defined as market information that
is readily available, regularly updated, reliable, verifiable, non-proprietary, and sourced from independent entities actively participating in the
relevant market.
The investments fall under Level 3 classification, as they are not publicly traded and rely on inputs that cannot be directly observed. The
discount rate, power price and energy yield are the key unobservable inputs that significantly influence the fair value of investments. Any
increase or decrease in these factors would have an impact on valuation as can be seen in our sensitivities below.
Valuation assumptions and Inputs
Discount rates The discount rate used in the valuations is derived according to internationally recognised methods. Typical
components of the discount rate are risk free rates, country-specific and asset-specific risk premia.
The latter comprise the risks inherent to the respective asset class as well as specific premia for other risks such
as development and construction.
Power price Power prices are based on power price forecasts from leading market analysts. The forecasts are independently
sourced from a provider with coverage in almost all European markets as well as providers with regional expertise.
Energy yield Estimated based on third party energy yield assessments as well as operational performance data (where
applicable).
Inflation rates Long-term inflation is based on central bank targets for the respective jurisdiction.
Capital expenditure Based on the contractual position (e.g. engineering, procurement and construction agreement), where applicable.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED
© 2024 AEET | 77
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
Valuation sensitivities
For each of the sensitivities, it is assumed that potential changes occur independently of each other with no effect on any other base case
assumption, and that the number of investments remains static throughout the modelled life.
The Net Asset Value impacts from each sensitivity is shown below.
Discount rates
The Discounted Cash Flow (‘‘DCF’’) valuation of the investments which are held at fair value represents one component of the Net Asset Value
of the Group and the key sensitivities are considered to be the discount rate used in the DCF valuation and assumptions.
The weighted average valuation discount rate applied to calculate the investment valuation is 9.2% (2023: 7.7%). An increase or decrease in
this rate by 0.5% at investment level has the following effect on valuation.
31 December 2024
31 December 2023
+0.5% -0.5% -0.5% +0.5%
Change Change Change Change
Discount rate £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Valuation
(59)
61
(242)
250
Power price
Long term power price forecasts are provided by leading market consultants and are updated quarterly. The sensitivity below assumes a 10% increase
or decrease in merchant power prices relative to the base case for every year of the asset life. The sensitivity considers a flat 10% movement in
power prices for all years, i.e. the effect of adjusting the forecast electricity price assumptions in each of the jurisdictions applicable to the
investments down by 10% and up by 10% from the base case assumptions for each year throughout the operating life of the investment.
A change in the forecast electricity price assumptions by plus or minus 10% has the following effect on valuation, as shown below.
31 December 2024
31 December 2023
-10.0% +10.0% -10.0% +10.0%
Change Change Change Change
Power price £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Valuation
(48)
51
(64)
66
Energy yield
The base case assumes a (‘‘P50’’) level of output. The P50 output is the estimated annual amount of electricity generation (in MWh) that has a
50% probability of being exceeded both in any single year and over the long term and a 50% probability of being under achieved. Hence the
P50 is the expected level of generation over the long term. The sensitivity illustrates the effect of a 10% lower annual production (a downside
case) and a 10% higher annual production (upside case). The sensitivity is applied throughout the whole term of the projects.
The table below shows the sensitivity of the project values to changes in the energy yield applied to cash flows from project as explained above.
31 December 2024
31 December 2023
-10.0% +10.0% -10.0% +10.0%
Change Change Change Change
Energy yield £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Valuation
(296)
297
(555)
533
Inflation rates
As most payments are fixed and not linked to the inflation rate, a sensitivity of the inflation rate has only a negligible impact on the NAV.
Capital expenditure
The Group has contractual protections if capex is delayed (i.e. reduce the capex or increase receivables due) and the Group is not obliged to
fund cost overruns. Therefore, capex sensitivities are not appropriate for the Group’s type of investments.
78 | © 2024 AEET
4. INVESTMENTS CONTINUED
Investments at Amortised Cost
a) Investments at amortised cost
The disclosure below presents the gross carrying value of financial instruments to which the impairment requirements in IFRS 9 are applied
and the associated allowance for ECL. Please see Note 3 for more detail on the allowance for ECL where the Group has classified the investment
portfolio according to stages.
The following table analyses loans by staging for the Group as at 31 December 2024:
31 December 2024
31 December 2023
Gross Net Gross Net
Carrying Allowance Carrying Carrying Allowance carrying
Amount for ECL Amount Amount for ECL amount
Group £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Fixed Value Investments at amortised cost
Stage 1
21,194
(118)
21,076
54,399
(259)
54,140
Stage 2
27,156
(1,923)
25,233
156
(24)
132
Stage 3
2,384
(2,384)
2,306
(1,588)
718
Total Assets
50,734
(4,425)
46,309
56,861
(1,871)
54,990
b) Expected Credit Loss allowance for IFRS 9
Impairment Provisions are driven by changes in credit risk of instruments, with a provision for lifetime ECL recognised where the risk of default
of an instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition.
The following table analyses Group ECL by stage.
Group
31 December 31 December
2024 2023
£‘000 £‘000
At 1 January
1,871
136
Charge for the year – Stage 1
(141)
182
Charge for the year – Stage 2
1,899
(35)
Charge for the year – Stage 3
796
1,588
Allowance for ECL at 31 December
4,425
1,871
Stage 2 losses
The stage 2 ECL provision increased because certain investments were deemed to be in arrears of more than 90 days as at 31 December 2024
and because the credit risk of Superbonus investments was deemed to have changed to the ESCOs themselves rather than the purchasers of
the tax credits generated by these investments.
Stage 3 losses
The Stage 3 losses relate to full impairments against three investments, which were partially provided against as at 31 December 2023: a CHP
investment in the United Kingdom, the sub-metering investment in Germany and a Solar PV investment in Spain where the prospects of
significant recoveries were deemed remote.
Measurement uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of ECL
The recognition and measurement of ECL is complex and involves the use of judgement and estimation. This includes the formulation and
incorporation of multiple forward-looking economic conditions into ECL to meet the measurement objective of IFRS 9.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED
© 2024 AEET | 79
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
The ECL recognised in the financial statements reflects the effect on expected credit losses of a range of three possible outcomes, calculated
on a probability-weighted basis, based on the economic scenarios described in Note 3 to the financial statements, including management
overlays where required. The probability-weighted amount is typically a higher number than would result from using only the base (most
likely) economic scenario. ECLs typically have a non-linear relationship to the many factors which influence credit losses, such that more
favourable macroeconomic factors do not reduce defaults as much as less favourable macroeconomic factors increase defaults. The ECL
calculated for each of the scenarios represents three outcomes that have been evaluated to estimate ECL. As a result, the ECL calculated for
the upside and downside scenarios should not be taken to represent the upper and lower limits of possible actual ECL outcomes. There is a
high degree of estimation uncertainty in numbers representing tail risk scenarios when assigned a 100% weight. A wider range of possible
ECL outcomes reflects uncertainty about the distribution of economic conditions and does not necessarily mean that credit risk on the associated
loans is higher than for loans where the distribution of possible future economic conditions is narrower.
The PD ratios ranged from 0.02% to 8.27% for Stage 1 investments and 1.41% to 27.62% for Stage 2 investments. On a weighted basis the
PD ratios for Stage 1 investments were 1.32% and for Stage 2 investments 9.03%. The PD ratios for Stage 3 investments were 100%. The
LGD ratios ranged from 12.0% to 100.0% for Stage 1 investments and 16.9% to 82.3% for Stage 2 investments. On a weighted basis the
LGD ratios for Stage 1 investments were 31.0% and for Stage 2 investments 80.5%. The LGD ratios for Stage 3 investments were 100%.
Two downside scenarios were provided as follows: the first scenario is LGD% assumed increased to 100%, in which event we calculate that
this would result in an ECL provision of £5,159,000. A further second, harsher scenario would be to assume that in addition to an LGD% of
100%, the PD% is also increased by 50%. In this case the ECL provision would be £6,544,000.
Investments held by the Company
The Company holds 100% of the equity shares of its subsidiary, AHL, which are held at cost less impairment in the Company’s Statement of
Financial Position. The Company also holds the loan notes in the Italian SPV, which are held at fair value through profit or loss in the Company’s
Statement of Financial Position.
The Company’s investments in subsidiaries comprise the following:
Company
As at 31 December As at 31 December
2024 2023
£‘000 £‘000
Investment in the Italian SPV, held at fair value through profit or loss
29,351
35,683
Investment in AHL, held at cost less impairment
9,048
9,971
Total investments
38,399
45,654
The movement in the Company’s investment in AHL was as follows:
Gross carrying amount
For the year For the year
ended ended
31 December 31 December
2024 2023
£‘000 £‘000
Opening balance
11,791
Additions during the year
11,791
Closing balance
11,791
11,791
Accumulated impairment
Opening balance
(1,820)
Impairment loss recognised in the year
(923)
(1,820)
Closing carrying amount
9,048
9,971
80 | © 2024 AEET
5. INVESTMENT INCOME
For the year For the year
ended ended
31 December 31 December
2024 2023
Group £‘000 £‘000
Investment interest income
4,679
5,027
Bank interest income
718
921
Total investment income
5,397
5,948
Company
For the year For the year
ended ended
31 December 31 December
2024 2023
£‘000 £‘000
Investment interest income
3,797
3,426
Bank interest income
406
654
Total investment income
4,203
4,080
6. INVESTMENT ADVISORY FEES
For the year ended For the year ended
31 December 2024 31 December 2023
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
Group £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Investment advisory fees
647
647
808
808
For the year ended For the year ended
31 December 2024 31 December 2023
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
Company £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Investment advisory fees
647
647
808
808
Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the following fee is payable to the Investment Adviser:
(i) 0.95 per cent. per annum of Committed Capital of the Company up to and including £500 million; and
(ii) 0.75 per cent. per annum of Committed Capital of the Company above £500 million.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED
© 2024 AEET | 81
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
7. OTHER EXPENSES
For the year ended For the year ended
31 December 2024 31 December 2023
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
Group £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Secretary and administrator fees
297
297
281
281
Tax compliance
37
37
62
62
Directors' fees
326
326
281
281
Broker’s fees
320
320
182
182
Auditors’ fees*
-
Fees payable to the Company’s auditors for
the audit of the Company’s annual accounts
506
506
590
590
-
Fees payable to the Company’s auditors
and its associates for other services:
audit of the accounts of subsidiaries
27
27
26
26
AIFM fees
112
112
91
91
Registrar's fees
52
52
23
23
Marketing fees
93
93
104
104
FCA and listing fees
29
29
26
26
Investment expenses
169
169
332
332
Legal fees
169
169
235
235
Other expenses
237
237
259
259
Total other expenses
2,374
2,374
2,492
2,492
For the year ended For the year ended
31 December 2024 31 December 2023
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
Company £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Secretary and administrator fees
219
219
199
199
Tax compliance
26
26
41
41
Directors' fees
228
228
203
203
Broker’s fees
320
320
182
182
Auditor's fees*
-
Fees payable to the Company’s auditors for
the audit of the Company’s annual accounts
506
506
590
590
-
Fees payable to the Company’s auditors
and its associates for other services:
27
27
26
26
AIFM fees
112
112
91
91
Registrar's fees
52
52
23
23
Marketing fees
93
93
104
104
FCA and listing fees
29
29
26
26
Legal fees
169
169
235
235
Other expenses
158
158
192
192
Total other expenses
1,939
1,939
1,912
1,912
* For the year to 31 December 2024, the statutory audit fees payable to the Company’s auditors and its associates for the audit of the Company and consolidated financial
statements were £325k (2023: £309k), excluding VAT. Further fees of £97k were also included in the year in relation to the statutory audit of the Company and consolidated
financial statements for the year to 31 December 2023, excluding VAT (2023: £178k in relation to the statutory audit of the Company and consolidated financial statements for
the year to 31 December 2022, excluding VAT). The audit fees payable to the Company’s auditors and its associates for the audit of the Company’s subsidiaries are £23k
(2023: £22k) excluding VAT, which was paid by the Parent entity.
82 | © 2024 AEET
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED
8. TAXATION
(a) Analysis of charge in the year
For the year ended For the year ended
31 December 2024 31 December 2023
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
Group £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Corporation tax
Taxation
For the year ended For the year ended
31 December 2024 31 December 2023
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
Company £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Corporation tax
Taxation
(b) Factors affecting total tax charge for the year
The tax assessed for the year is higher (2023: lower) than the Companys applicable rate of corporation tax for the year of 25% (2023: 23.5%).
The factors affecting the current tax charge for the year are as follows
The effective UK corporation tax rate applicable to the Company for the period is 25% (2023: 23.5%). The tax charge differs from the charge
resulting from applying the standard rate of UK corporation tax for an investment trust company.
The differences are explained below:
For the year ended 31 December 2024
For the year ended 31 December 2023
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
Group £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
(Loss)/profit on ordinary activities before
taxation
(178)
(1,849)
(2,027)
913
(609)
304
Corporation tax at 25% (2023: 23.5%)
(45)
(462)
(507)
215
(143)
72
Effects of:
Excess management expenses brought
forward
(30)
(30)
(320)
(35)
(355)
Deemed interest payment under income
streaming rules
(52)
(52)
Non deductible expenses
162
162
415
415
Movements on investments not allowable/
taxable
(35)
462
427
(310)
178
(132)
Tax charge for the year
© 2024 AEET | 83
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
For the year ended 31 December 2024
For the year ended 31 December 2023
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
Company £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Profit/(loss) on ordinary activities before
taxation
694
(3,027)
(2,333)
(681)
924
243
Corporation tax at 25% (2023: 23.5%)
174
(757)
(583)
(160)
217
57
Effects of:
Excess management expenses brought
forward
(30)
(30)
(320)
(320)
Group relief
(460)
(460)
Deemed interest payment under income
streaming rules
(77)
(77)
Non deductible expenses
393
393
480
480
Movements on investments not allowable/
taxable
757
757
(217)
(217)
Tax charge for the year
The Company has an unrecognised deferred tax asset of £nil (2023: £89,000) based on a main rate of corporation tax of 25% (2023: 25%).
In its 2021 budget, the UK government announced that the main rate of corporation tax would increase to 25% for the fiscal year beginning
on 1 April 2023. The deferred tax asset has arisen due to the cumulative excess of deductible expenses over taxable income. Given the
composition of the Company’s portfolio, it is not likely that this asset will be utilised in the foreseeable future and therefore no asset has been
recognised in the financial statements.
Given the Company’s intention to meet the conditions required to retain its status as an Investment Trust Company, no provision has been
made for deferred UK capital gains tax on any capital gains or losses arising on the revaluation or disposal of investments.
9. RETURN/(LOSS) PER ORDINARY SHARE
Group
Return per share is based on the consolidated loss for the year of £2,027,000 (2023: profit of £304,000) and the weighted average number
of Ordinary Shares in issue of 88,335,524 (2023: 100,000,000) during the year. Consolidated revenue loss amounts to £178,000 (2023: profit
of £913,000) and consolidated capital loss amounts to £1,849,000 (2023: loss of £609,000).
Company
Return per share is based on the Company loss for the year of £2,333,000 (2023: profit of £243,000) and the weighted average number of
Ordinary Shares in issue of 88,335,524 (2023: 100,000,000) during the year. Company revenue profit amounts to £694,000 (2023: loss of
£681,000) and Company capital loss amounts to £3,027,000 (2023: profit of £924,000).
10. CURRENT ASSETS
As at 31 December 2024
As at 31 December 2023
Group Company Group Company
Trade and other receivables £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Trade receivables
80
56
652
255
Shareholder loan receivable
27,292
27,293
Total
80
27,348
652
27,548
At 31 December 2024, the Company had a Shareholder loan receivable from AHL in the amount of £27,292,000 (2023: £27,293,000). The
interest rate is 7.90% per annum which is then being adjusted every fourth quarter of the financial year in order for AHL to earn a gross
margin of at least 50bps from its financing activities. The loan is repayable in full on 31 December 2046.
84 | © 2024 AEET
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED
10. CURRENT ASSETS CONTINUED
Derivative financial instruments
As at 31 December 2024
As at 31 December 2023
Group Company Group Company
£‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Forward currency contracts
122
The forward currency contracts outstanding at 31 December 2023 comprised the following:
Sale of euro 37,198,000 for £32,431,000 for settlement on 9 January 2024; and Sale of euro 34,834,000 for £30,362,000 for settlement on
23 February 2024.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprises bank balances held by the Group and Company, including short-term deposits.
The carrying amount of these represents their fair value. Cash balances in excess of a predetermined amount are placed on short-term deposit
at market rates of interest.
11. CREDITORS: AMOUNTS FALLING DUE WITHIN ONE YEAR
Payables
As at 31 December 2024
As at 31 December 2023
Group Company Group Company
£‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Intercompany balance with Attika Holdings Limited
2,443
Accrued expenses
1,094
968
1,016
874
Unsettled trades
43
41
Total
1,137
3,411
1,057
874
Derivative financial instruments
As at 31 December 2024
As at 31 December 2023
Group Company Group Company
£‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
Forward currency contracts
24
The forward currency contracts outstanding at the year end comprised the following:
Sale of euro 38,000,000 for £31,411,000 for settlement on 21 January 2025; and Sale of euro 28,900,000 for £24,212,000 for settlement
on 28 February 2025.
© 2024 AEET | 85
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
12. SHARE CAPITAL
As at As at
31 December 31 December
2024 2023
£‘000 £‘000
Allotted, issued and fully paid:
Ordinary Shares of 1p each
Opening balance of 100,000,000 Ordinary Shares
1,000
1,000
Repurchase and cancellation of 18,561,732 (2023: nil) Ordinary Shares following a Tender Offer
(186)
Closing balance of 81,438,268 (2023: 100,000,000) Ordinary Shares
814
1,000
The Ordinary Shares rank pari passu and each share carries one vote in the event of a poll at a general meeting.
Following a Tender Offer during the year, the Company repurchased and cancelled 18,561,732 of its own Ordinary Shares, nominal value
£185,617 for a total consideration of £17,500,000, representing 18.6% of the Ordinary Shares outstanding at the beginning of the year.
13. RESERVES
Group
Capital
redemption Special Capital Revenue
reserve reserve reserve reserve
£‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
At 1 January 2024
93,500
(178)
(41)
Repurchase and cancellation of Ordinary Shares following a
Tender Offer
186
(17,5 00)
Expenses of Tender Offer
(88)
Dividends paid
(4,999)
Loss on ordinary activities after taxation
(1,849)
(178)
At 31 December 2024
186
70,913
(2,027)
(219)
Capital
redemption Special Capital Revenue
reserve
1
reserve
2
reserve
3
reserve
4
Company £‘000 £‘000 £‘000 £‘000
At 1 January 2024
93,500
2,923
(2,547)
Repurchase and cancellation of Ordinary Shares following a
Tender Offer
186
(17,5 00)
Expenses of Tender Offer
(88)
Dividends paid
(4,999)
(Loss)/profit on ordinary activities after taxation
(3,027)
694
At 31 December 2024
186
70,913
(104)
(1,853)
The Company’s Articles of Association permit dividend distributions out of realised capital profits.
1
The capital redemption reserve represents the accumulated nominal value of shares repurchased for cancellation. This reserve is not distributable.
2
The special reserve arose following the cancellation of the share premium account in 2021. As a result, this became a distributable reserve
and may be used to repurchase the Company’s own Ordinary Shares or distributed as dividends.
3
The capital reserve comprises realised and unrealised gains and losses on investments and foreign currency. An analysis has not been made
between those that are realised (and may be distributed as dividends or used to repurchase the Companys own Ordinary Shares) and those
that are unrealised.
4
The revenue reserve may be distributed as dividends or used to repurchase the Companys own Ordinary Shares. The balance on the Company’s
revenue reserve is currently negative and therefore no distribution can be made.
86 | © 2024 AEET
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED
14. NET ASSET VALUE PER ORDINARY SHARE
The Group’s net asset value per Ordinary Share as at 31 December 2024 is based on the £69,667,000 (2023: £94,281,000) net assets of the
Group attributable to the 81,438,268 (2023: 100,000,000) Ordinary Shares in issue as at 31 December 2024.
The Company’s net asset value per Ordinary Share as at 31 December 2024 is based on the £69,956,000 (2023: £94,876,000) net assets of
the Company attributable to the 81,438,268 (2023: 100,000,000) Ordinary Shares in issue as at 31 December 2024.
15. DIVIDENDS
The Company has paid the following interim dividend in respect of the year under review:
For the year ended For the year ended
31 December 2024 31 December 2023
Pence per Total Pence per Total
Dividend paid in the year Ordinary Share £‘000 Ordinary Share £‘000
Interim – paid 1 November 2024
6.139p
4,999
Total
6. 1 39p
4,999
The Company is not required to pay a dividend in respect of the current or prior year in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 1159 of
the Corporation Tax Act 2010, as it has a negative balance on its revenue reserve. The above dividend was paid out of the special reserve.
The Company paid an of 1.25p per share, amounting to £1,250,000 on 20 March 2023, in respect of the year ended 31 December 2022.
16. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
The Investment Adviser, AIFM and the Administrator report to the Board on a quarterly basis and provide information to the Board which
allows it to monitor and manage financial risks relating to the Group’s operations. The Group’s activities expose it to a variety of financial
risks: market risk (including price risk, interest rate risk and foreign currency risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. These risks are monitored by the
AIFM. Each risk and its management are summarised below.
(i) Currency risk
Foreign currency risk is defined as the risk that the fair values of future cashflows will fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates.
The Group’s and the Company’s financial assets and liabilities are denominated in sterling and the euro and substantially all of its revenues
and expenses are in sterling and the euro. The Group and the Company are therefore exposed to foreign currency risk.
For any non-base currency assets, the Investment Adviser can use forward foreign exchange contracts to seek to hedge up to 100% of
non-sterling exposure.
The Company does not intend to use hedging or derivatives for investment purposes but may use derivative instruments such as forwards,
options, future contracts and swaps to hedge currency, inflation, interest rates, commodity prices and/or electricity prices.
With many of its investment assets denominated in the euro, the Group uses a series of regular forward foreign exchange contracts to provide
a level of protection against movement in the sterling exchange rate. Under these arrangements the Group is required to provide £2.5 million
in cash as collateral for these forward foreign exchange contracts. Following the failure of the Continuation vote, the Group is currently
reviewing the strategic options for realising value for Shareholders. The Board will consider the appropriateness of the current hedging
arrangements and the cash collateral as part of the review of strategic options and in light of the cash requirements of the Group.
© 2024 AEET | 87
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
The currency profile of the Group as at 31 December 2024 is as follows:
31 December 2024
31 December 2023
GBP EUR Total GBP EUR Total
Assets £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
Cash and cash equivalents
7,358
7,059
14,417
23,547
5,535
29,082
Trade and other receivables
56
24
80
159
493
652
Derivative financial
122
122
instruments
Investments
3,021
53,310
56,331
3,566
61,916
65,482
Total assets
10,435
60,393
70,828
27,394
67,944
95,338
Liabilities
Creditors
(986)
(151)
(1,137)
(901)
(156)
(1,057)
Derivative financial
(24)
(24)
instruments
Total liabilities
(1,010)
(151)
(1,161)
(901)
(156)
(1,057)
If the value of sterling against euro increased or decreased by 10% (2023: 10%), if all other variables remained constant, the NAV of the Group
would increase or decrease by £6,039,000 (2023: £6,794,000) without taking account of the Group’s forward foreign exchange contracts.
The currency profile of the Company as at 31 December 2024 is as follows:
31 December 2024
31 December 2023
GBP EUR Total GBP EUR Total
Assets £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
Cash and cash equivalents
3,957
3,663
7,620
19,884
2,664
22,548
Shareholder loan receivable
27, 292
27,292
27, 293
27,293
Trade and other receivables
56
56
255
255
Investments in subsidiaries
9,048
29,351
38,399
9,971
35,683
45,654
Total assets
40,353
33,014
73,367
57,403
38,347
95,750
Liabilities
Intercompany balance with
Attika Holdings Limited
(2,443)
(2,443)
Accrued expenses
(968)
(968)
(874)
(874)
Total liabilities
(3,411)
(3,411)
(874)
(874)
If the value of the sterling against euro increased or decreased by 10% (2023: 10%), if all other variables remained constant, the NAV of the
Group would increase or decrease by £3,301,000 (2023: £3,835,000).
(ii) Interest rate risk
The Group’s interest rate risk on interest bearing financial assets is limited to interest earned on cash and investments. The interest rates of
investments held at amortised cost are fixed therefore the interest rate risk is minimal. Investments held at fair value through profit or loss
have variable returns based on e.g. power production levels and not on variability in interest rates.
88 | © 2024 AEET
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED
16. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT CONTINUED
The Group’s interest and non-interest bearing assets and liabilities as at 31 December 2024 are summarised below:
31 December 2024
31 December 2023
Interest Non-interest Interest Non-interest
bearing bearing Total bearing bearing Total
Assets £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
Cash and cash equivalents
9,121
5,296
14,417
27,817
1,265
29,082
Trade and other receivables
80
80
652
652
Derivative financial
122
122
instruments
Investments
46,309
10,022
56,331
54,990
10,492
65,482
Total assets
55,430
15,398
70,828
82,807
12,531
95,338
Liabilities
Creditors
(1,137)
(1,137)
(1,057)
(1,057)
Derivative financial
(24)
(24)
Instruments
Total liabilities
(1,161)
(1,161)
(1,057)
(1,057)
The Company’s interest and non-interest-bearing assets and liabilities as at 31 December in each reporting year are summarised below:
31 December 2024
31 December 2023
Interest Non-interest Interest Non-interest
bearing bearing Total bearing bearing Total
Assets £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
Cash and cash equivalents
3,971
3,649
7,620
21,606
942
22,548
Trade and other receivables
56
56
255
255
Shareholder loan receivable
27,292
27,292
27,293
27, 293
Investments in subsidiaries
29,351
9,048
38,399
35,683
9,971
45,654
Total assets
60,614
12,753
73,367
84,582
11,168
95,750
Liabilities
Intercompany balance with
Attika Holdings Limited
(2,443)
(2,443)
Accrued expenses
(968)
(968)
(874)
(874)
Total liabilities
(3,411)
(3,411)
(874)
(874)
(iii) Price risk
Price risk is defined as the risk that the fair value of a financial instrument held by the Group will fluctuate. As of 31 December 2024 the Group
held investments at fair value through profit or loss with an aggregate fair value of £10,022,000 (2023: £10,492,000). All other things being
equal, the effect of a 10% increase or decrease in the prices of the investments held at the year-end would have been an increase or decrease
of £1,002,000 (2023: £1,049,000) in the profit after taxation for the year ended 31 December 2024 and the Group’s net assets at 31 December
2024. The sensitivity of the investment valuation due to price risk is shown further in note 4.
As of 31 December 2024 the Company held investments at fair value through profit or loss with an aggregate fair value of £29,351,000 (2023:
£35,683,000). All other things being equal, the effect of a 10% increase or decrease in the prices of the investments held at the year-end
would have been an increase or decrease of £2,935,000 (2023: £3,568,000) in the profit after taxation for the year ended 31 December 2024
and the Company’s net assets at 31 December 2024.
(iv) Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of loss due to the failure of a borrower or counterparty to fulfil its contractual obligations. The Group and the Company
is exposed to credit risk in respect of the investments valued at amortised cost, interest income receivable and other receivables and cash at
bank. The Group and the Company’s credit risk exposure is minimised by dealing with financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings.
© 2024 AEET | 89
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
Continued monitoring of the investments and the counterparties/service providers, including the use of credit rating data providers, allows
the Investment Adviser to identify and address these risks early. Where possible, the Investment Adviser seeks to mitigate credit risks by the
counterparty having the opportunity to sell electricity to the grid or other customers. The Investment Adviser also seeks to structure investments
whereby contracts can be adapted/extended to accommodate periods of payment defaults. Diversification of counterparties and service
providers ensures any impact is limited. In addition, a diversified portfolio provides further mitigation.
The table below shows the cash balances of the Group and the Company as well as the credit rating for each counterparty:
As at 31 December 2024
As at 31 December 2023
Company Group Company Group
Rating £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
Goldman Sachs-Liquid Reserves Fund AAAmmf (Fitch
249
249
6,632
6,632
Rating)
EFG Deposit account
A (Fitch Rating)
7,333
9,000
15,858
19,248
Royal Bank of Scotland International
A+ (Fitch Rating)
38
5,013
58
2,998
Bank of New York Mellon
AA (Fitch Rating)
155
204
7,620
14,417
22,548
29,082
The table below shows the amortised cost investment balances of the Group as well as the credit rating for each counterparty:
As at As at
31 December 31 December
2024 2023
Group £‘000 £‘000
A
4,346
5,871
B
33,865
31,890
C
8,098
16,509
D
720
46,309
54,990
The Group and the Company classified each project using a certain credit risk band. Listed below are the conversion methodology used:
Corresponding
Credit risk band S&P rating range
A
AAA to A-
B
BBB+ to BBB-
C BB to CC-
D Default
(v) Liquidity risks
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company may not be able to meet a demand for cash or fund an obligation when due. The Investment Adviser,
AIFM and the Board continuously monitor forecast and actual cashflows from operating, financing and investing activities to consider payment
of dividends or further investing activities.
90 | © 2024 AEET
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTINUED
16. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT CONTINUED
The financial liabilities by maturity of the Group at the year-end are shown below:
31 December 31 December
2024 2023
Less than 1 year Less than 1 year
£’000 £’000
Liabilities
Payables
(1,137)
(1,057)
Derivative financial instruments
(24)
(1,161)
(1,057)
The financial liabilities by maturity of the Company at the year-end are shown below:
31 December 31 December
2024 2023
Less than 1 year Less than 1 year
£’000 £’000
Liabilities
Payables
(3, 411)
(874)
(3,411)
(874)
As at 31 December 2024, the Group has total commitments of £0.04 million (31 December 2023: £5.26 million) to its investments which
are unfunded.
Capital management
The Company considers its capital to comprise ordinary share capital, distributable reserves and retained earnings. The Company is not subject
to any externally imposed capital requirements.
The Company’s primary capital management objectives are to ensure the sustainability of its capital to support continuing operations, meet
its financial obligations and allow for growth opportunities. Generally, acquisitions are anticipated to be funded by a combination of current
cash and equity.
17. TRANSACTIONS WITH THE INVESTMENT ADVISER
Aquila Capital Investmentgesellchaft has been appointed as the Investment Adviser to the Company and full details of the Investment Advisory
Agreement are given in the Directors Report on page 29. Investment advisory fees payable in respect of the year ended 31 December 2024
amounted to £647,000 (2023: £808,000), of which £319,000 (2023: £361,000) was outstanding at the year end.
© 2024 AEET | 91
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
18. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Directors
Details of the remuneration payable to Directors and details of Directors shareholdings are given in the Directors Remuneration Report on
page 45 and page 46 respectively.
Subsidiary and wholly owned entity
The following table includes details of the subsidiary and other wholly owned entity of the Company. Further details of these are given in
notes 1 and 2 to the accounts. Transactions with these entities have been carried out at arms length. The Company has prepared consolidated
accounts, which incorporate these two entities.
Entity name and registered address
Effective ownership
Investment
Country of incorporation
Attika Holdings Limited
100%
HoldCo Subsidiary entity,
United Kingdom
Leaf B, 20th Floor, Tower 42, Old Broad Street, which owns underlying
London, England, EC2N 1HQ investments
Compartment 2 of SPV Project 2013 S.r.l. 100% of the notes of one Special purpose entity, Italy
Via Vittorio Betteloni, 2 20131, Milan, Italy compartment which owns underlying
investments.
Transaction with the subsidiary
At 31 December 2024, the Company had a Shareholder loan receiveble from its subsidiary, Attika Holdings Limited (“AHL), amounting to
£27,292,000 (2023: £27,293,000). Under the terms of the loan agreement, the initial interest rate is is 7.9% per annum, which is then adjusted
every fourth quarter of the financial year in order for AHL to earn a gross margin of at least 50 basis points from its financing activities. The
loan is repayable in full on 31 December 2046.
At 31 December 2024, the Company had an intercompany balance payable to AHL, amounting to £2,443,000 (2023: nil).
19. EVENTS AFTER THE ACCOUNTING DATE
The following events occurred after the accounting date, and for which no adjustments have been made in the financial statements:
On 28 February 2025, the Group received £7.0 million from the disposal of its investment in Bio-LNG, in addition to a quarterly receipt of £0.5
million in January 2025.
In February and March 2025, the Board entered agreements for the repayment of three of the Group’s five Superbonus investments, for a
total consideration of £19.3 million, of which £16.3 million had been received by 31 March 2025.
92 | © 2024 AEET
OTHER INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
In reporting financial information, the Company presents alternative performance measures, “APMs”, which are not defined or specified under the
requirements of IFRS. These APM’s are commonly used by investment companies to assess values, investment performance and operating costs.
There have been no changes in these APMs from the prior year. The APMs presented in this report are shown below, together with supporting
numerical calculations.
(Discount)/premium
The amount by which the share price of an investment trust is lower (discount) or higher (premium) than the NAV per share. The discount or
premium is expressed as a percentage of the NAV per share.
Page
As at
31 December
2024
As at
31 December
2023
NAV per Ordinary Share (pence) a
3 85.55 94.28
Share price (pence)
b
3 52.00 57.25
Discount (%) (b÷a) -1 (39.2) (39.3)
Ongoing charges
A measure, expressed as a percentage of average net assets, of the regular, recurring annual costs of running an investment company. Theaverage
net assets has been computed as the average of the published NAV for 31 December 2023, 30 June 2024 and 31 December 2024.
Page
As at
31 December
2024
As at
31 December
2023
Average NAV‘000) a
n/a 80,459 94,349
Annualised expenses’000)
b
n/a
3,021
1
3,300
1
Ongoing charges (%) (b÷a) 3.8 3.5
1
Figure includes Investment Advisory fees and Other expenses as disclosed in the Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Comprehensive
Income.
Total return
A measure of performance that includes both income and capital returns. This takes into account capital gains and reinvestment of dividends
paid out by the Company into the Ordinary Shares of the Company on the ex- dividend date.
Year ended 31 December 2024 Page NAV per share Share price
Opening at 1 January 2024 (pence) a
n/a 94.28 57.25
Dividend adjustment (pence) b
n/a 6.14 6.14
Closing at 31 December 2024 (pence)
c
3
85.55
52.00
Total (loss)/return (%) ((c+b)÷a)-1 (2.7) 1.6
Year ended 31 December 2023 Page NAV per share Share price
Opening at 1 January 2023 (pence) a
n/a 95.23 71.00
Dividend adjustment (pence) b
n/a
1.25 1.25
Closing at 31 December 2023 (pence)
c
3
94.28
57.25
Total return/(loss) (%) ((c+b)÷a)-1 0.3 (17.6)
ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES OF THE GROUP
© 2024 AEET | 93
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
AIC
Association of Investment Companies.
Alternative Investment Fund or “AIF
An investment vehicle under AIFMD. Under AIFMD (see below) Aquila
Energy Efficiency Trust Plc is classified as an AIF.
Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive or “AIFMD
A European Union directive which came into force on 22 July 2013 and
has been implemented in the UK.
Annual General Meeting or “AGM
A meeting held once a year which Shareholders can attend and where
they can vote on resolutions to be put forward at the meeting and ask
directors questions about the company in which they are invested.
the Company
Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust Plc.
(Discount)/Premium
The amount by which the share price of an investment trust is lower
(discount) or higher (premium) than the NAV per share. The discount
or premium is expressed as a percentage of the NAV per share.
Dividend
Income receivable from an investment in shares.
Ex-dividend date
The date from which you are not entitled to receive a dividend which
has been declared and is due to be paid to Shareholders.
ECL
Expected Credit Loss
EMEA
Europe, the Middle East and Africa.
ESCO
Energy Service Company.
EU
European Union.
Financial Conduct Authority or “FCA”
The independent body that regulates the financial services industry in
the UK.
Gearing
A way to magnify income and capital returns, but which can also magnify
losses. A bank loan is a common method of gearing. See also “leverage”
below.
Gearing effect
The effect of borrowing on a company’s returns.
General Meeting ‘‘GM’’
A meeting which Shareholders can attend and where they can vote on
resolutions to be put forward at the meeting and ask directors questions
about the company in which they are invested.
Gross Asset Value
The sum of the value of the assets a company owns.
the Group
Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust Plc and its subsidiaries, Attika Holdings
Limited and SPV Project 2013 S.r.l.
GWh
Gigawatt hour.
The Holdco
Attika Holdings Limited (“AHL” or “Attika”).
IEA
International Energy Agency.
Index
A basket of stocks which is considered to replicate a particular stock
market or sector.
Investment company
A company formed to invest in a diversified portfolio of assets.
IPO
Initial Public Offering.
Investment Trust
An investment company which is based in the UK and which meets
certain tax conditions which enables it to be exempt from UK corporation
tax on its capital gains. The Company is an investment trust.
IRR
Internal rate of return.
GLOSSARY
94 | © 2024 AEET
Leverage
An alternative word for “Gearing”.
Under AIFMD, leverage is any method by which the exposure of an AIF
is increased through borrowing of cash or securities or leverage embedded
in derivative positions.
Under AIFMD, leverage is broadly similar to gearing, but is expressed
as a ratio between the assets (excluding borrowings) and the net assets
(after taking account of borrowing). Under the gross method, exposure
represents the sum of a company’s positions after deduction of cash
balances, without taking account of any hedging or netting arrangements.
Under the commitment method, exposure is calculated without the
deduction of cash balances and after certain hedging and netting
positions are offset against each other.
Liquidity
The extent to which investments can be sold at short notice.
Net assets or net asset value (‘NAV’)
An investment company’s assets less its liabilities.
NAV per Ordinary Share
Net assets divided by the number of Ordinary Shares in issue (excluding
any shares held in treasury).
Ongoing charges
A measure of the regular, recurring annual costs of running an investment
company, expressed as a percentage of average net assets.
Ordinary Shares
The Company’s ordinary shares in issue.
Portfolio
A collection of different investments held in order to deliver returns to
Shareholders and to spread risk.
Share buyback
A purchase of a company’s own shares. Shares can either be bought
back for cancellation or held in treasury.
Share price
The price of a share as determined by a relevant stock market.
Total return
A measure of performance that takes into account both income and
capital returns. This may take into account capital gains, dividends,
interests and other realised variables over a given period of time.
GLOSSARY
CONTINUED
© 2024 AEET | 95
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
1
Corinne Sayers
From: Sinead Van Duuren <sinead.vanduuren@apexgroup.com>
Sent: 28 March 2025 13:15
To: Corinne Sayers; Typesetting; aeetcosecmbx@sannegroup.com; Jeremy Jones;
Sylvanus Cofie; Grace Goudar; Phil Austen; Tania Austen
Subject: RE: 270403 AEET
Attachments: AEET- Annual Report 2024 Draft 5 Blackline 28 March - sent to Perivan.docx; SFDR
Periodic Disclosure Template_Article 8_ENG-AEET-2025-03-31_v4.pdf
Dear Perivan,
We have been tracking the Word document that we sent to you for production of proof 1 with updates
(as we needed to record further updates before we received Proof 1). Would it be possible to make
these updates to the first proof this afternoon and send us a Blackline and Clean Proof 2 today?
I am also expecting to be able to send you some minor updates to the back half this afternoon. These
will be provided as manuscript updates to the first proof that you provided yesterday.
I also attach an SFDR Periodic Disclosure document, which is required to be included as an Annex to
the Annual Report. Please can you add at the end of the Annual Report, before the Company
Information Page. Please add the below heading at the top of the first Annex page:
I am available on 07941 948145 if you have any questions at all.
With thanks in advance.
Kind regards,
Sinead
Sinead
Van
Duuren
Company Secretary, Listed Funds Team
t:
+44 20 8078 0534
sinead.vanduuren@apexgroup.com
From: Corinne Sayers <csayers@perivan.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2025 2:46 PM
To: Sinead Van Duuren <sinead.vanduuren@apexgroup.com>; Typesetting <typesetting@perivan.com>;
aeetcosecmbx@sannegroup.com <aeetcosecmbx@apexgroup.com>; Jeremy Jones
<jeremy.jones@apexgroup.com>; Sylvanus Cofie <sylvanus.cofie@apexgroup.com>; Grace Goudar
<Grace.Goudar@apexgroup.com>; Phil Austen <PAusten@perivan.com>; Tania Austen <tausten@perivan.com>
Subject: RE: 270403 AEET
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise
the sender and know the content is safe.
ANNEX IV
Template periodic disclosure for the financial products referred to in Article 8, paragraphs 1, 2 and
2a, of Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 and Article 6, first paragraph, of Regulation (EU) 2020/852
Product name: Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust PLC Legal entity identifier: 213800AJ3TY3OJCQQC53
Environmental and/or social characteristics
To what extent were the environmental and/or social characteristics promoted
by this financial product met?
During the reference period, the Fund was invested in multiple
energy efficiency projects, thereby promoting the environmental characteristics of the Fund - climate change
mitigation. The Fund has used derivatives for hedging purposes only and the promoted environmental
characteristics were not affected by the use of derivatives.
How did the sustainability indicators perform? The sustainability indicators that were
defined to measure the attainment of environmental characteristics are a) energy savings, and b) the
avoidance of GHG emissions in t of CO2eq. Over the course of the reference period, the Fund's assets
enabled energy savings of 19,581 MWh and avoided 5,285 t CO2 eq emissions.
Did this financial product have a sustainable investment objective?
Yes
No
It made
sustainable
investments with an
environmental objective: ___%
in economic activities that
qualify as environmentally
sustainable under the EU
Taxonomy
in economic activities that do
not qualify as environmentally
sustainable under the EU
Taxonomy
It
promoted Environmental/Social (E/S)
characteristics and
while it did not have as its objective a
sustainable investment, it had a proportion of
___% of sustainable investments
with an environmental objective in economic
activities that qualify as environmentally
sustainable under the EU Taxonomy
with an environmental objective in
economic activities that do not qualify as
environmentally sustainable under the EU
Taxonomy
with a social objective
It made sustainable investments
with a social objective: ___%
It promoted E/S characteristics, but did not
make any sustainable investments
Sustainable
investment means
an investment in an
economic activity
that contributes to
an environmental or
social objective,
provided that the
investment does not
significantly harm
any environmental or
social objective and
that the investee
companies follow
good governance
practices.
The EU Taxonomy is
a classification
system laid down in
Regulation (EU)
2020/852,
establishing a list of
environmentally
sustainable
economic activities.
That Regulation
does not include a
list of socially
sustainable
economic activities.
Sustainable
investments with an
environmental
objective might be
aligned with the
Taxonomy or not.
Sustainability
indicators measure
how the
environmental or
social
characteristics
promoted by the
financial product
are attained.
THIS DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS UNAUDITED
96 | © 2024 AEET
…and compared to previous periods? Over the course of the reference period, the Fund's
assets deployed into more energy efficiency investments, however enabled 4,058 MWh less of
energy savings and avoided 1,281t less CO2eq emissions.
This decrease is due to the failure of the sub-metering investment in Germany where it is assumed
that all savings were lost and due to excluding savings after certain other investments were fully
realised.
What were the top investments of this financial product?
What was the proportion of sustainability-related investments?
What was the asset allocation? At least 90% of the investments made during the reporting
period have been made in the category #1B. The investments under the category #2 Other only
included instruments used for liquidity and/or risk management purposes.
In which economic sectors were the investments made? The investments made under
#1B are part of the following sectors:
Energy efficiency
Largest investments Sector % Assets Country
Water
management services
Energy
e
15.8% Germany
Biogas
Energy
e
12.9% Germany
Building energy efficiency
-1
Energy
e
12.7% Italy
Building energy efficiency
-2
Energy
e
12.6% Italy
Building energy efficiency
-3
Energy
e
10.9% Italy
Building energy efficiency
-4
Energy
e
7.6% Italy
Solar PV
Energy
e
5.0% Spain
Building energy efficiency
-5
Energy
e
4.0% Spain
Asset allocation
describes the
share of
investments in
specific assets.
#
1 Aligned with E/S characteristics includes the investments of the financial product used to attain the
environmental or social characteristics promoted by the financial product.
#2Other includes the remaining investments of the financial product which are neither aligned with the
environmental or social characteristics, nor are qualified as sustainable investments.
Investments
#1 Aligned with E/S
characteristics
#1B Other E/S
characteristics
#2 Other
The list includes the
investments
constituting the
greatest proportion
of investments of
the financial product
during the reference
period which is:
1.1.2024-31.12.2024
APPENDIX
CONTINUED
THIS DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS UNAUDITED
© 2024 AEET | 97
STRATEGIC REPORT
GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION
To what extent were the sustainable investments with an environmental
objective aligned with the EU Taxonomy?
The Fund did not make any Taxonomy-aligned
investments.
Did the financial product invest in fossil gas and/or nuclear energy related
activities complying with the EU Taxonomy
1
?
Yes:
fossil gas In nuclear energy
No
What was the share of investments made in transitional and enabling activities?
Since the fund did not make any sustainable investments, the minimum share of investments in
transitional activities is 0% and the minimum share of investments in enabling activities is 0% as well.
1
Fossil gas and/or nuclear related activities will only comply with the EU Taxonomy where they contribute to
limiting climate change (“climate change mitigation”) and do not significantly harm any EU Taxonomy objective -
see explanatory note in the left hand margin. The full criteria for fossil gas and nuclear energy economic activities
that comply with the EU Taxonomy are laid down in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214.
The graphs below show in green the percentage of investments that were aligned with the EU Taxonomy.
As there is no appropriate methodology to determine the taxonomy-alignment of sovereign bonds*, the
first graph shows the Taxonomy alignment in relation to all the investments of the financial product
including sovereign bonds, while the second graph shows the Taxonomy alignment only in relation to the
investments of the financial product other than sovereign bonds.
* For the purpose of these graphs, ‘sovereign bonds’ consist of all sovereign exposures.
100%
100%
100%
OpEx
CapEx
Turnover
0% 50% 100%
1. Taxonomy-alignment of investments
including sovereign bonds*
Taxonomy-aligned (no gas and nuclear)
Non Taxonomy-aligned
Taxonomy-aligned
activities are
expressed as a share
of:
- turnover
reflecting the
share of revenue
from green
activities of
investee
companies.
- capital
expenditure
(CapEx) showing
the green
investments made
by investee
companies, e.g. for
a transition to a
green economy.
- operational
expenditure
(OpEx) reflecting
green operational
activities of
investee
companies.
X
100%
100%
100%
OpEx
CapEx
Turnover
0% 50% 100%
2. Taxonomy-alignment of investments
excluding sovereign bonds*
Taxonomy-aligned (no gas and nuclear)
Non Taxonomy-aligned
This graph represents 100% of the total investments.
98 | © 2024 AEET
How did the percentage of investments that were aligned with the EU Taxonomy
compare with previous reference periods?
No change
What investments were included under “other”, what was their purpose and
were there any minimum environmental or social safeguards?
Investments that fall under the category "Other" only included instruments used for liquidity and/or
risk management purposes and did not affect the promotion of environmental characteristics of the
Fund.
What actions have been taken to meet the environmental and/or social
characteristics during the reference period?
Since the Fund has invested in energy efficiency
projects during the reference period, thereby promoting the environmental characteristics of the Fund, no
further actions were required to meet the environmental characteristics.
APPENDIX
CONTINUED
THIS DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS UNAUDITED
© 2024 AEET | 99
INVESTING WITH IMPACT
ANNUAL REPORT 2024
Directors (all non-executive)
Miriam Greenwood OBE DL (Chair)
Nicholas Bliss
David Fletcher
Janine Freeman
Registered office
(Registered in England and Wales with
Company number. 13324616)
4th Floor
140 Aldersgate Street
London
England
EC1A 4HY
AIFM
FundRock Management Company (Guernsey) Limited
Sarnia House
Le Truchot
St Peter Port
Guernsey
GY1 1GR
Investment Adviser
Aquila Capital Investmentgesellschaft mbH
Valentinskamp 70
D-20335
Hamburg
Germany
Broker
Stifel Nicolaus Europe Limited
150 Cheapside
London
EC2V 6ET
Administrator and Company Secretary
Apex Listed Companies Services (UK) Limited
4th Floor, 140 Aldersgate Street
London
England
EC1A 4HY
Registrar
Computershare Investor Services PLC
The Pavilions
Bridgwater Road
Bristol
BS99 6AH
Independent Auditors
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
7 More London Riverside
London
SE1 2RT
COMPANY INFORMATION
Contents
Your Company at a Glance ...........................3
Highlights.........................................3
STRATEGIC REPORT
Chair’s Statement ..................................4
Investment Adviser’s Report ..........................6
Environmental, Social and Governance ................13
Investment Policy .................................16
Key Performance Indicators .........................18
Risk Management .................................19
Section 172 Report ................................24
Other information .................................26
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ Report ..................................28
Corporate Governance Statement.....................34
Directors’ Remuneration Report ......................43
Report of the Audit and Risk Committee ...............48
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities ...............51
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Independent Auditors’ Report .......................52
Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and
Comprehensive Income .............................60
Company Statement of Profit or Loss and
Comprehensive Income .............................61
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position ...........62
Company Statement of Financial Position ..............63
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity ...........64
Company Statement of Changes in Equity ..............65
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows ................66
Company Statement of Cash Flows....................67
Notes to the Financial Statements ....................68
OTHER INFORMATION
Alternative Performance Measures ...................92
Glossary .........................................93
Annex I - Article 8 Periodic Disclosures ................95
Company Information ..............................99
For more information please visit our website
www.aquila-energy-efficiency-trust.com
AQUILA ENERGY EFFICIENCY TRUST PLC
ANNUAL REPORT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024
© 2024 AEET | A
INVESTING WITH IMPACT
AQUILA ENERGY EFFICIENCY TRUST PLC
ANNUAL REPORT 2024
For more information please contact:
Aquila Group
Valentinskamp 70
20355 Hamburg
Germany
Tel.: +49 (0)40 87 50 50-100
Email: info@aquila-capital.com
Web: www.aquila-capital.com
Follow us on
Hamburg · Frankfurt · London · Luxembourg · Madrid · Oslo · Zurich · Invercargill · Singapore · Tokyo
Important Notice: This document serves informational purposes only. It constitutes neither an investment advice, an investment service nor the
invitation to make offers or any declaration of intent; the contents of this document also do not constitute a recommendation for any other
actions. The validity of the provided information is limited to the date of preparation of this document and may change at any time for various
reasons, especially the market development. The sources of information are considered reliable and accurate, however we do not guarantee the
validity and the actuality of the provided information and disclaim all liability for any damages that may arise from the use of the information.
Historical information cannot be understood as a guarantee for future earnings. Predictions concerning future developments only represent
forecasts. Statements to future economic growth depend on historical data and objective methods of calculation and must be interpreted as
forecasts. No assurances or warranties are given, that any indicative performance or return will be achieved in the future. The terms Aquila
and Aquila Capital comprise companies for alternative and real asset investments as well as sales, fund-management and service companies
of Aquila Group (“Aquila Group” meaning Aquila Capital Holding GmbH and its affiliates in the sense of sec. 15 et seq. of the German Stock
Corporation Act (AktG)). The respective responsible legal entities of Aquila Group that offer products or services to (potential) investors/
customers, are named in the corresponding agreements, sales documents or other product information.
A publication of Aquila Capital Investmentgesellschaft mbH. As at 28 April 2025
Read more about our
commitment to sustainability
www.aquila-capital.de/esg/
AEET | ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024